has anyone every wondered why, ya know, a mouthy preacher, (comments out of context), and knowing people involved in chicago politics, (not the cleanest of places), is the ABSOLUTE WORST DIRT anyone has dug up on obama?

has it occurred to anyone that he's a pretty clean guy?

and that hillary is less so?

and mccain even less?

everyone shitting on obama, remember something: how long have democrats wanted a ethical, inspirational, game-changing politician to run a top notch campaign for the presidency, and bring congress along for the win? a long time. (bill couldn't stop tripping his wang over his baggage to turn any tide, politically).

and any fair assessment of the situation must concede that hillary is not that "game changing" politician. obama may not be, either, but he's got a much better chance.

'ats all i'm sayin.

Posted at April 25, 2008 3:02 PM in response to Obama Campaign Confirms Joint Fundraising Committee With The DNC

the 1992 campaign was structured COMPLETELY differently than this one, and you know it.

this needs to start happening.

one image that keeps popping up in my mind is that this summer and fall, in communities all over america, is the contrast between a mccain rally and an obama rally. the sheer difference in excitement and energy between mccain's campaign and obama's could well be the overall narrative we see this fall, (that, and a whole lot of republican boogie-man shit storms that mean little).

imagine what the contrast would be between hillary and mccain? about the same level of passion between those two., imo. sorry, but one is pasty and old and one is shrill. 'xcuse me while i change the channel.

let's just wrap this up, huh? if hillary had ran a better campaign, she would deserve it.

he ran better, it's his, it's time for him to grab it, for the good of us all.

Posted at April 25, 2008 2:44 PM in response to Obama Campaign Confirms Joint Fundraising Committee With The DNC

the 1992 campaign was structured COMPLETELY differently than this one, and you know it.

this needs to start happening.

one image that keeps popping up in my mind is that this summer and fall, in communities all over america, is the contrast between a mccain rally and an obama rally. the sheer difference in excitement and energy between mccain's campaign and obama's could well be the overall narrative we see this fall, (that, and a whole lot of republican boogie-man shit storms that mean little).

imagine what the contrast would be between hillary and mccain? about the same level of passion, imo.

let's just wrap this up, huh? if hillary had ran a better campaign, she would deserve it.

he ran better, it's his, it's time for him to grab it, for the good of us all.

Posted at April 25, 2008 2:42 PM in response to Obama Campaign Confirms Joint Fundraising Committee With The DNC

look at their support demographics, and new voter registration, and i think this much is clear:

if she gets the nomination, she looses at least of quarter of the party.

if he gets the nomination, he looses maybe ten percent.

i used to feel comfortable w/ hillary as a presidential choice, but i've come to think that there is some strange, and none-of-my-business power relationship/fetish between the clinton that, for them, obscures a view of the writing on the wall . . . .

someone, please, explain to me why she's doing this?

Posted at April 25, 2008 12:38 PM in response to Hillary's Game Plan -- A Path To Victory?

maybe this is easy, folks.

he goes on fox, makes a stand against the bullshit foxnews, looks like a democratic fighter, and doesn't have to attack hillary to do so.

he just has to stay out of the mud as much as possible.

Posted at April 25, 2008 11:23 AM in response to Senior Obama Adviser: Obama Will "Take Fox On" In Appearance This Sunday