If McCain is helping to shield his bundlers with illegal contributions and Bush was having falsified documents drawn up to prove his case for war, we should take these instances and consider them like people who break into cars to steal stereos or other such things. These type of criminals might break into ten cars in a night. When they are caught they are charged with one crime, but it stands to reason that these thieves have committed many more crimes than the ones they are being charged. With politicians when a crime is discovered, it should be considered that the crime the politician is caught doing is probably only one of a larger list of crimes perpetrated. We need to take back the word conspiracy and assume that these crimes are common place. The word has come to be associated with mental illness rather than its proper place as a word which describes what happens more often than not in politics and in general when there is a lot of money or power to be had. We need to reverse engineer the history of corruption since Reagan was put into office and make sure similar crimes do not happen again by taking legislative measures. Why didn't Bill Clinton find the people in government who were selling crac k in black neighborhoods to raise money for the Contras? Why was Noriega completely shut up? Do we really believe that this guy committed suicide in the anthrax case?

Posted at August 9, 2008 10:29 PM in response to Group To Ask Justice Department To Probe McCain's Bundlers

Elizabeth Edwards is a fine choice to lead the move on health care. Smart and she knows the subject backward and forward. I find it poetic that she puts ahead her fight for the health of the nation in her last strong days before she suffers from her own inevitable health problems. She is the best person. It brings a tear to my eye.

Posted at June 10, 2008 8:43 AM in response to Obama Says He's Partnering With Elizabeth Edwards On Health Care

Monica, I am so glad to see you have a sense of humor. How is it you know so much about WV? What would you say are the things that Americans know least about you? What is in your future? In fact, I don't really know much about your background. What are the things that made you into the person that you are today?

Posted at May 14, 2008 10:55 AM in response to Top Ten Reasons Obama Lost West Virginia

This is a brilliant move by Obama. It shows his commitment to think outside of the box and his commitment to always try to think of win-win situations, precisely the kind of person I want talking to our enemies. If anybody's noticed Fox's viewership is down, way down. People are finally able to see through their partisan bias and friendships with this regime. I know that people are upset that Fox will have a ratings dream when Obama comes on the show. From what I have seen of clips from Fox and news about connections to the white house, there is plenty of fuel for Barack to finally show some anger. People want to see that he can be tough and also communicate to people who became suspicious of him because of Jeramiah Wright. I pray the circus can stop and we can move on to letting the issues be discussed which will affect our history.

Posted at April 25, 2008 1:19 PM in response to Senior Obama Adviser: Obama Will "Take Fox On" In Appearance This Sunday

This is about the General Clark comment. He has probably been promised the vice president position if Hillary gets elected. Though I respect Clark, it is hard for me to respect the position he has taken by supporting Hillary. Say Anything Hillary mentioning sniper fire which she later said was untrue and known to be false by her, is just as bad as a person wearing a military pin they never earned. Anybody who still supports Hillary after this, ignoring her lies, has a problem with honesty himself and is willing to say anything without regard to how it reflects on him. That is why she is the lesser candidate, much lesser.

Posted at April 20, 2008 12:50 PM in response to Obama-Backing General: Clinton Lacks "Moral Authority" Over Bosnia Gaffes