Now Obama just needs an Edwards endorsement, and we're good to go.

Posted at March 22, 2008 5:37 PM in response to Gallup: Obama Retakes Lead Over Hillary

Classy response. The misogynistic vibes are tickling me all over.

Posted at March 21, 2008 3:45 PM in response to Girl In Red Phone Ad Denounces Hillary And Her "Politics Of Fear"

McCain is indeed having a breath of fresh air right now--not to mention the press he's getting for his recent Middle East excursion...and even Hillary--who constantly insinuates that the media is against her--is driving on a relatively smooth terrain.

I agree with Grinder. I'm interested in what the polls will show in the next few days after Obama's speech has sunk in with the American people. Some (obviously) will be turned off by the whole Wright controversy, but others will be drawn to the speech Obama gave on March 18th.

And considering how ridiculous this primary season has been so far, I'm positive the media will find another juicy story for the public to enjoy relatively soon. The focus is on Obama now, but I personally believe the lens will shift on someone else real, real quick.

Posted at March 20, 2008 11:51 AM in response to Poll: Hillary Up By 16 Points In Pennsylvania

"What he (Obama) and his campaign do is to demonize anyone who dares to talk about race as being a factor in this campaign."

You bring up a good point, but you have to understand that it goes the same way regarding gender -- if what you said about Obama seems plausible enough, than you have to admit that Clinton -- and yes, Ferraro as well -- are "demonizing" anyone that dares to talk about gender the same way Obama is talking about race.

Posted at March 12, 2008 8:32 PM in response to Ferraro Resigns From The Clinton Campaign

Sorry about that. Still, a magnificent display.

Posted at February 23, 2008 9:25 PM in response to Hillary: "Shame On You, Barack Obama"

The advisor behind Hillary deserves an Oscar for his head-nodding performance. He was into it, no doubt.

I honestly do not understand how Senator Clinton would not consider her performance hypocritical -- especially considering all the belligerent tactics she herself has employed throughout this campaign. Whether or not she considers her accusations contradictory is beside the point -- but she knows that voters (at least some significant fraction) will take that stance. So why do it? Why push forth this image of a hypocrite, when it only boosts Obama's vision of a new America not overtaken by "old time" political schemes?

She recognizes that she has to be assertive, but I think she's coming to a sad realization that there's nothing to sink Obama without her campaign going down just the same.

Posted at February 23, 2008 9:07 PM in response to Hillary: "Shame On You, Barack Obama"