What apology McCitizen? ...Obama simply said he took her at her word...she never apologized she 'regrets' and these regrets were for the Kennedys whom she 'might' have offended. But who cares...it just 'words' anyway. What is outrageous is the fallout she has spawned. See below:

http://www.americablog.com/2008/05/liz-trotta-fox-news-analyst-laughed.html

Posted at May 26, 2008 12:40 PM in response to Obama Camp: We Accept Hillary's Apology; Let's Move On

Otto is right in saying "...image of idealism formerly associated with Obama supporters." I was (artlessly) fully committed to a "let the best candidate win" campaign. I was so repulsed by the present administration. Then I heard Hillary answer "not as far as I know" to the question of Obama being Muslim (she knew better)...later she pontificated "I would not have remained in that church." She made hay with the 'bitter' comments and that's when I realized that this talented woman had chosen, not to run a campaign on her considerable merits, but instead to lacerate her opponent at every opportunity. She called him a 'wimp' and even her surrogate Carville said in an interview "If Hillary gave one of her xxxxx to Obama he would have one and she would have two." nary an apology for those sickening comments. Later came the fact that he could not carry 'white workers' although Oregon has disproved that by 16% in a state in which she and her family campaigned ardously. All this to say that I did not come to my current stance easily, but sadly, here I am.

Posted at May 26, 2008 12:10 PM in response to Rick Horowitz and Hillary Clinton's "My Way" & Paul Krugman Plays the Tool

What I have come to understand from all the Clintonista threats to secede from the Democratic party and their admonitions that should Clinton not win they will not vote for Obama, regardless, and from their ongoing mantra blaming Obama is that these people are Clintonites, not Democrats. They, like their icon only want what they want and the earth be scorched. It finally sunk in when in an appalling overabundance of tacky Clinton chose to bolster her determination to stay on by alluding to RFK's assassination. EVEN if no malice was attached to the utterance, it was done in a blatant attempt to tie herself to the Kennedy aura rather than to cite more recent, more reasonable examples of late campaigns. But it was HER gaffe and furious that Sen. Obama did not flaunt it as she did the bitter comments and the Wright situation, she and her minions decided that if he was going to be rational, they could blame him for HER dim-witted obtuse comment. (her own mentor, Charles Rangel, has already called her utterances 'dumb'". Her camp followers (including Krugman)have bought it hook line and sinker. I have read the blogs. It's Obama's fault that she is being 'demonized'. It is obvious from her lack of endorsements that the Superdelegates see her for what she is. It is obvious from the Superdelegates that have abandoned her that they do not want any part of her campaign. Like a wilfull child she has ravaged the fabric of unity in the name of Clinton. She should at least have the decency to accept the blame.

Posted at May 26, 2008 11:45 AM in response to Rick Horowitz and Hillary Clinton's "My Way" & Paul Krugman Plays the Tool

Good imagery...

Posted at May 26, 2008 11:22 AM in response to Rick Horowitz and Hillary Clinton's "My Way" & Paul Krugman Plays the Tool

Unfortunately, the dim-witted obtuse comment made by Hillary has had a consequence. Here is Liz Trotta, a former bureau chief and FOX analyst:

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/15659.html

This is really scary.

Posted at May 26, 2008 9:57 AM in response to Some Further Thought on the A-Word Gaffe

I am not swayed by these 'unswayed' super delegates. Word is that many politicos fear the long memories of the Clintons as to what they perceive as disloyalty. So let's pretend to hear you both out and "nah....neither convinced me." My take is that they are waiting for the nomination to come without them having to put themselves at risk. That is why my hat is off to all the superdelegates that have committed, whether to Clinton or Obama for having the integrity and intestinal fortitude (for lack of Carville's vocabulary) to put their money where their mouth is. In the same article where Carville alluded to Clinton's 'cojones', he also said in response to a question about superdelegates ..."that and $4.00 will get you a cup of coffee at the Ritz...." For those growing cobwebs on the sidelines, maybe he's right.

Posted at May 8, 2008 3:49 PM in response to A Super-Delegate Meets With Hillary And Obama, Comes Away Unswayed

Obama at least lived in the state he represents. Hillary represents a state she never lived in and got the Senator gig solely through her political connections....how's that for sober up?

Posted at April 20, 2008 12:01 AM in response to Obama-Backing General: Clinton Lacks "Moral Authority" Over Bosnia Gaffes

Clark, who wasn't there, backed her up....but her pilot, Col Changose (who was there) said "there wasn't even a bumblebee" and furthermore had there been any...ANY...danger they would have never landed with the first lady and the first daughter...all make-believe...Oh..excuse me, misspeak. I agree with the general and I for one am sick and tired of Hillary's school yard bully tactics. when Obama backs off she calls him a wimp and when anyone hits back, her campaign whines and says "no fair"....like hubby says....you don't like the heat...stay out of the kitchen...I am glad that Obama has some supporters that, like me, are fed up with their Draco Malfoy tactics.

Posted at April 19, 2008 11:51 PM in response to Obama-Backing General: Clinton Lacks "Moral Authority" Over Bosnia Gaffes