We buy our fear at the highest possible price. Don't play the stock market because our track record is horrible.

Posted at June 28, 2008 4:53 AM in response to U.S. Settles for $5.8 Million With Scientist Accused In 2001 Anthrax Scare

It's not that we don't have a suspect, it's that we don't have an investigation. Like 9/11 we don't investigate what is understood. I think "Up All Night" is treading the right path until he supports the integrity of DOJ.

However it went down, the anthrax was ours, and under watch. It went where it was intended and achieved the desired results.

Why does anyone think that our "Leaders" would be averse to spending as much of our money as they could? Especially when we spend it in order to hoodwink ourselves into spending more.

Posted at June 28, 2008 4:42 AM in response to U.S. Settles for $5.8 Million With Scientist Accused In 2001 Anthrax Scare

That's a NOT for VEEP...
Well, maybe Siddhartha.

Posted at May 9, 2008 12:18 AM in response to NOT good Obama Veep choices

"Obama/Kucinich, Obama/Paul, Obama is revolutionary" These are statements read on this thread.

I support Obama, but, I don't believe that anyone gets this far without being beholden.
Why can't Kucinich and Paul can't break the 5% mark? The answer is, because they ARE revolutionary. If Obama did not receive 'special interest' approval, he would not be were he is.

Obama/Siddhartha '08
Obama/Feinstein '08
Obama/Boxer '08
Obama/Huffington '08

Posted at May 9, 2008 12:15 AM in response to NOT good Obama Veep choices

You ain't gotalife if you think a gas tax holiday
shows leadership in regards to gas prices.

...Might as well bomb Iran.

BTW, the Beef was on Hillary's backside but may have been eaten by the Billygoat.

Please put your Depends back on you make excrement on this blog.

Posted at May 8, 2008 11:16 PM in response to Obama's Super-Del Whip: Many Super-Dels Back Obama, But Won't Go Public

Oops, here is th link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGF3cyHE7M

Posted at April 14, 2008 9:58 PM in response to Hillary Airs New Ad In Pennsylvania Hitting Obama's "Small-Town" Comments

Baraks "bitter" statements might have been poorly phrased, but they tell some of the few truths in recent politics.
Here he is saying the same thing in 2004.

Posted at April 14, 2008 9:53 PM in response to Hillary Airs New Ad In Pennsylvania Hitting Obama's "Small-Town" Comments

Sorry, that clip is actually from 2004.
Which, to me, gives Obama's statements depth and honor. He has been thinking about the disenfranchised for some time. He was raised as one.

If you missed the clip, it's here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGF3cyHE7M

Posted at April 14, 2008 9:16 PM in response to In Pennsylvania Robocall, Obama Surrogate Pushes Back On Criticism Of "Small Town" Comments

Listen to Obama's "bitter" comment
using the language he used in 11/07

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGF3cyHE7M

Is he an "out of touch elitest"?

Posted at April 14, 2008 9:05 PM in response to In Pennsylvania Robocall, Obama Surrogate Pushes Back On Criticism Of "Small Town" Comments

Relax people

Once the dem nominee has been decided
McLame will perish under the close scrutiny he is not now receiving.I believe that either Obama or Clinton will beat him once he receives their undivided focus.

Posted at April 11, 2008 6:37 AM in response to Poll: Obama Slips Against McCain, Now Losing Among Independents