The comment above was in response to geha714's comment about Georgia being the victim.

Posted at August 9, 2008 8:28 PM in response to McCain Camp: Obama "Bizarrely In Sync With Moscow"

Read up on the history of Georgia and South Ossetia.

South Ossetia has wanted to break away from Georgia for years now, which prompted the war after the fall of the Soveit Union in 91, aptly called the War in South Ossetia. The war lead to a cease fire and an agreement that allowed South Ossetia de fecto independence from Georgia while not allowing it cede from Georgia entirely.

This war began because Georgia was trying to take back control of this area (Which they call a rebel stronghold because of the seperatists) and Russia responded because a good portion of the South Ossetia population is either Russian (Immigrants) or Russian sympathizers who want to become part of North Ossetia (Which is part of Russia... in essence, most of the South Ossetian population either wants complete autonomy or wants to be a part of Russia).

Posted at August 9, 2008 8:25 PM in response to McCain Camp: Obama "Bizarrely In Sync With Moscow"

^^^That comment was to Hollywood.

Posted at March 6, 2008 11:19 PM in response to Dean To Florida Senator Bill Nelson: Sorry, We're Not Funding A Revote

Uh, you do realize what the rules are right? She and Obama both knew nothing would come of Florida because of what the DNC had decided. And even Hillary didn't protest the decision to strip them of their delegates. Now all of the sudden she's two stepping and saying that the people shouldn't be stripped of their voices? Do you not see anything wrong with the logic given the fact that she initially didn't make a stink about the whole thing?

Posted at March 6, 2008 11:12 PM in response to Dean To Florida Senator Bill Nelson: Sorry, We're Not Funding A Revote

If you know her record so well maybe you could point out how exactly she's more qualified when she's on the same level as Obama?

Posted at March 6, 2008 8:38 PM in response to Rasmussen: Hillary Leads By 15 In Pennsylvania

That's idiotic. Seriously. You say:

"1) Its patently obvious to everyone that McCain has the credentials to be Commander in Chief. The vast majority of people already know this to be the case, and if national security was their only concern, they wouldn't hesitate to vote for him."

Uhhh... I'm sorry, I didn't hear you on that one. I'm not sure if you've done your homework... but his record on the Senate is poor... he's basically the most "experienced" candidate at doing a whole hell of a lot of nothing. How does that translate to credential for Commander And Chief? That's ridiculous. He has about the same level of credentials as Obama or Hillary but people think being on Capital Hill longer automatically means someone "is more ready" to handle the job. This just shows people's misconceptions about our system.

Posted at March 6, 2008 7:58 PM in response to Hillary: McCain Has Crossed "Commander In Chief Threshold"

That has to be one of the worst excuses of "political analysis" I've heard in a while.

You don't honestly think Hillary will have it THAT easy against McCain do you? Polls NOW show her losing to him. Granted that could drastically change by November, but I have a feeling it wont be for the better if she wins the nomination. I know a lot of Obama supporters who refuse to vote for Hillary... and would even vote for McCain to make sure she doesn't get in. McCain will capitalize on that big time.

And what has Hillary done to "change" anything? I'm not an Obama supporter, but have you looked at her record? By your remarks it's obvious you haven't. Neither her, nor Obama, nor McCain scores well on any marks in the Senate.

Posted at March 5, 2008 3:47 AM in response to Obama Campaign: Hillary's Chance Of Winning Actually Decreased Tonight