Sure, I am a 59 year old white male, but I guess having a colleague degree makes me incapable of understanding Mrs. Clinton's "message". I just ask all those fantastic young people who with enthusiasm and intelligence have engaged in this campaign: Mrs. Clinton is not about 1968, you are. You understood what the late 60s were about: don't get fooled by manipulative politicians who want to tell you what is good for you. In January 2009 when you watch Obama being sworn in as president, you all will be able to say: YES, WE CAN!

Posted at June 4, 2008 4:58 AM in response to Hillary: "I Will Be Making No Decisions Tonight"

Mrs. Clinton better make sure that Obama gets elected president. If not, you can bet SHE will be held responsible for his loss.

exhibit A: GOP campaign ad quoting Mrs. Clinton to bolster their claim that McCain is the "better" candidate.

Her political career is almost over now, if will be over for sure, if Obama looses the presidency. It will not be "I told you so", it will be "You broke it".

Posted at June 4, 2008 4:51 AM in response to Hillary: "I Will Be Making No Decisions Tonight"

Graceless in campaigning, graceless in defeat, clueless in the face of a historical moment, hero of Tuzla, 3 am phone girl. Mrs. Clinton lost not because of sexism, she lost because of her stupid ways of viewing the world. Are we with her or against her (health care ca 199x AD)? We are against her, because we are for America. May God bless you, Saint Hillary of the Sour Grapes, "winner" of the "popular vote", looser of reality. She can't even stop lying when it's over.

Posted at June 4, 2008 4:45 AM in response to Hillary: "I Will Be Making No Decisions Tonight"

According to CNN he is -1 delegates away from winning the campaign - can't declare himself the nominee though, before the "future" vice president Hillary Clinton selects him as her running mate in the president slot. She was in it to win - ok, ok, she misspoke - again. If there were on Oscar for shabby campaigning and sorry losers, Hillary Clinton would get it. If she would just for once shut her mouth.

Posted at June 3, 2008 9:32 PM in response to 5:03 CST: Obama Is 12 Delegates Away

Hey, can't you Obama fans not even spell: my name is Terryble McAwful, and we all know that Hillary Clinton will be there, come January. 'Cause she has to make sure that president Obama will not deliver his oath of office on the Quran. He is not a Muslim, as far as she knows - but who knows; better make sure.

Thank god this is finally over. Hillary Clinton should never again run for anything. Her campaign was just an extremely mean attack on the intelligence, goodwill and patience of American citizens. Does she really hate America so much that she has to treat its citizens with such campaigns?

Posted at June 3, 2008 7:10 PM in response to Hillary Campaign Downplays Reports That She Said She'd Be "Open" To Being Veep

"I am open to it, if it would help the party's prospects in November."

No, Ms. Clinton, it would not help the party's prospects in November, if you were on the ticket. You have lied, schemed, misspoken enough - now just go away.

Posted at June 3, 2008 6:58 PM in response to Hillary Campaign Downplays Reports That She Said She'd Be "Open" To Being Veep

In the words of one Hillary Clinton: "They are not going to count for anything." Her delirious campaign's treatment of small vendors shows how she "truly" cares about hard-working Americans - not at all. But maybe it's just because they were not white Americans. Ms. Clinton has put Karl Rove to shame - the GOP doesn't need Karl Rove anymore. They have someone better now - Hillary Clinton. Quoting her husband: Hillary is just a sleazy, slimy scumbag. Well that was meant for someone else, but it fits. Thanks Bill, for telling the truth.

Posted at June 3, 2008 7:00 AM in response to "it's About the Clinton Family Money": Hillary Wants Obama to Pay Off Campaign Debt

But who cares what the rules were and what the rules are? Who cares what Ms. Clinton said a year ago or so? What matters is that Mrs. Clinton is entitled to the presidency and the Democratic party has no right to take that away from her. She must be the nominee and the next president, because otherwise she will be campaigning for the next 4 or 8 years - and you thought, 5 months of Democratic primaries and caucuses were too much? She will haunt you and never forgive you for not voting for her - she deserved 100% (sorry make that 99%, since we are not in Zimbabwe or the Soviet Union) of the votes. And she succeeded, because she got 100% of the votes that were cast for her - and you all know that the rest do not count. So where's the problem?

Posted at June 1, 2008 7:42 AM in response to Time to End this Debate

If by VP you mean "Vehemently Pandering" to hard-"working" white Americans - don't forget to bring your guns and whiskey bottles and leave your bitterness at home - yes, she is o.k. to be VP. Beyond that there is no place for Hillary Clinton or her husband in American politics for the next 20 years or so. She is obviously still too young and immature to be capable of sound judgment.

Posted at June 1, 2008 7:33 AM in response to Crazy Predictions After the RB Committee Meeting

When the nomination process started, did the rules say: whoever wins the popular vote, gets to be the nominee. If Obama had an overwhelming, unassailable popular vote lead, but were trailing in pledged and overall delegates say by 5 to 10, guess what Mrs. Clinton would be telling you right now?

May we paraphrase the "famous" ex-ex-prez Bill Clinton, campaigning ca. 1992 A.D.: "It's the rules, stupid!"

Posted at June 1, 2008 7:18 AM in response to Popular Vote numbers based on CNN & RCP.......