"We don't discuss our ad strategy. The colonel never gives away the secret recipe."

HaHaHaHa -- Best sell your KFC stock, if you own any.

I'm sure political strategists will be studying the genius of the Hillary campaign for decades to come!

Posted at April 16, 2008 12:41 PM in response to Source: Hillary TV Ad Campaign Is Now 100% Negative In Most Pennsylvania Markets

...meant to say "shorter top Clinton *donors*"

Posted at March 26, 2008 3:39 PM in response to In Letter, Top Clinton Donors Chastise Pelosi For Statements About Super-Delegates

Shorter Top Clinton Voters:

We need to let the democratic process play out so that the superdelegates can overrule it.

Posted at March 26, 2008 3:02 PM in response to In Letter, Top Clinton Donors Chastise Pelosi For Statements About Super-Delegates

I'm sure Bill meant nothing by "all this other stuff". Just as Trent Lott meant nothing by suggesting that we wouldn't have had "all these problems" had Strom Thurmond been elected President.

Posted at March 24, 2008 11:09 AM in response to Obama Campaign Manager Hints Clinton Camp Has "Pattern" Of Questioning Obama's Patriotism

Whoops, I attached that comment to the wrong thread. Sorry, kids....

Posted at March 19, 2008 6:24 PM in response to Obama: Odds Of Me Getting Elected Lower Than For "Conventional" Candidates Like Hillary

Here's what Obama *should* say:

Why the hell should we spend millions of dollars holding a Michigan primary to determine the fate of 10-20 pledged delegates, when the Clinton campaign has no intention of respecting the pledged-delegate count anyway?

Seriously, this is bizarre: In the Clinton spin, its all about "momentum", and electability, as they define it. It is eminently clear that they, and many of their supporters, see it as perfectly acceptable if superdels decide the election based on these criteria, rather than the delegate count.

These factors can be measures by polling and many other less expensive means. Why waste time counting votes, when votes don't matter?

Posted at March 19, 2008 6:16 PM in response to Obama: Odds Of Me Getting Elected Lower Than For "Conventional" Candidates Like Hillary

This is such a poorly designed survey question on so many levels --- ("No, not less likely". Triple-negative anyone?). Plus, the "middle" response, which in this case is a "yes, less likely" always gets an advantage over the "edge" responses, so its probably inflated a bit. And, they have a good 7 months to think it over. I don't think there is much one can draw from it.

Posted at March 18, 2008 7:45 PM in response to Poll: One Quarter Of Florida Dems Less Likely To Vote For Nominee Without Delegates

Or did they just darken the image a bit? (/snark)

Posted at March 11, 2008 5:06 PM in response to Hillary Camp To Orlando Patterson: We Do Have Black Child In 3 A.M. Ad

Its kinda' like when they unfairly portrayed Bill as a race-baiter by, you know, putting the camera on him and letting him talk.

Posted at March 10, 2008 4:43 PM in response to Hillary's New Mississippi Ad: She's A Comeback Kid