And then deleting the paper trail of stuff they don't like (e.g. criminal activity)

Posted at May 16, 2008 6:51 PM in response to Today's Must Read

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS FOR:

MI/FL/DEMS/YOU/ME/USA/WORLD etc

I guess by virtue that includes HC too...

Posted at May 14, 2008 5:47 PM in response to Edwards Will Endorse Obama Today

How much dya wanna bet Barack's appearance shatters the record for most-watched show on Fox since, oh, capture of Saddam? Of course even if it is, it won't be reported as such... certainly not by Fucks News.

Posted at April 25, 2008 5:37 PM in response to Senior Obama Adviser: Obama Will "Take Fox On" In Appearance This Sunday

LOVE the Blade. :)

Posted at April 18, 2008 8:21 PM in response to Obama Wins Vast Majority Of Pennsylvania Newspaper Endorsements

Right. Ironic, huh, that Obama supports MO and Hillary doesn't. Somebody should remind her about the Blue Dress and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Perfect example as to why I -- despite being a long-time Hillary supporter -- am firmly in the Obama camp.

Posted at April 18, 2008 8:19 PM in response to Obama Wins Vast Majority Of Pennsylvania Newspaper Endorsements

This is PRECISELY why there needs to be a movement to investigate any and all criminal acts in the planning and execution of this war and the rest of Bush Presidency. Even if such an investigation was carried out by a non- or bi-partisan group as opposed to the Dem majority or a Dem Prez, having such an investigation into criminal acts on-going would constantly remind everyone of the horrific evil and criminal acts of this administration.

Perhaps the statute of limitations is such that any investigation could not possibly yield any criminal prosecutions, but having this disastrous administration thoroughly investigated for criminal acts will not only keep the issue in the public eye (to the Dems' benefit), but will also make more obvious -- and preserve for posterity -- that the legacy of the Bush Administration is rife with criminal behavior from the top down.

Posted at March 25, 2008 2:44 PM in response to Today's Must Read

GREAT post Urbinato.

Imho this should be the STARTING point of discussion on policies and plans, and anything beneath this (character attacks, animosity) should be rejected by both candidates and their subordinates as well as followers.

Posted at March 10, 2008 12:19 PM in response to Hat Tip to Hillary from an Obama Supporter

Haha. But she's an Obama adviser so they're in the Oval Office!

Posted at March 8, 2008 2:34 PM in response to Report: Girl "Safe And Asleep" In Hillary's 3 A.M. Ad Is Supporting...Obama!

This is a great little story, hehe. Here's the commercial: They should totally have the phone ringing at 3am and she picks it up and says, "It's for you" and then hands it to Obama. :)

Posted at March 8, 2008 2:14 PM in response to Report: Girl "Safe And Asleep" In Hillary's 3 A.M. Ad Is Supporting...Obama!

Slouch,

What a slippery slope argument, and of course it proves my point that to a large extent the anti-Hillary camp is focused on ideology and not intellectually honest debate on substantive issues. OF COURSE you are free to have your own opinions (DUH!), and I applaud that you are so interested in participating in this debate as an Independent, but it seems to me that you disagree with my comment that you are disagreeing with the following statement that I made:

"Hillary IS a Democrat and their policies are 90-99% the same even if their strategies differ"

If so, please provide one bit of evidence that Hillary Clinton is NOT a Democrat or that Obama and she differ significantly on issues of importance.

The fact is that you cannot disagree with that statement unless you are willfully ignoring or misinterpreting reality as we know it. Once again, I disagree with many of her CAMPAIGN TACTICS, but even Obama has said on multiple occasions that the differences in policy positions are minimal.

Let me be perfectly clear. I want Barack Obama to be the President. Straight up. Voted for him in the NY primary, etc. But I do *NOT* want to fall into the trap of an internalized blood-bath over what truly amounts to MIMINAL differences among two very very strong Democrats. We should be celebrating the differences and having a constructive dialog about issues of importance to America, and NOT demonizing one candidate or the other. Because of what I have just stated and my appreciation for Hillary's service on my behalf, I will continue to defend what I believe are unfair, ideologically-driven attacks on her by anyone.

There are plenty of issues to address in regards to Hillary's campaign, statements, or plans, but let's take out the personal demonization and have a debate on those issues.

Posted at March 7, 2008 5:14 PM in response to Power Resigns Over Hillary-Is-Monster Comment