Sean Madden
- : San Antonio, TX
- : 34
- : Liberal
- : Democratic
Even with Florida and Michigan, Obama Wins
I'm not sure why Hillary thinks it will matter.Obama is ahead by 143 delegateshttp://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/Florida will net Hillary 38. (Hillary 105, Obama 67)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Democratic_primary%2C_2008Michigan will give Hillary 18, if you count Uncommited as Obama.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Democratic_primary%2C_2008Hillary herself approves this:"However, his supporters organized a substantial...more »
Posted on May 6, 2008 2:34 PM
Obama Just Won
Hillary and McCain are stupid, stupid stupid.How do you walk into this trap?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc9PepjyDow&eurl=http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/Because Obama's not "finished," as much as Hillary and McCain wish he was. The minute Hillary started parroting Sean Hannity, I knew it was over. Seriously.You're going to...more »
Posted on April 12, 2008 1:18 AM
Expelled: Ben Stein's Creationist Propaganda
So, saw the ad for "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" on TPM.Did a quick google, and found this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yzgBj8deKEI knew Ben Stein was crazy, but not this crazy.Sigh. And I thought Kansas already decided this......more »
Posted on April 9, 2008 11:22 AM
Clinton leads Obama in Texas caucuses count?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/06/clinton-leads-obama-in-texas-caucuses-count/That's the headline."At last report, with 40 percent of precincts counted, Barack Obama led Hillary Clinton 56 percent to 44 percent in the Texas Democratic caucuses. Counting continues today.Clinton beat Obama to win the Texas Democratic primary 51 to 48...more »
Posted on March 6, 2008 11:47 AM
"False Hope" on Hillary's Chances
It's ironic that Hillary Clinton derides Obama about "false hope." She is selling it to her own supporters. The only hope Hillary has at this point is to convince the Super Delegates that New York, California, Ohio and (probably) Pennsylvania matter...more »
Posted on March 5, 2008 3:08 PM
What If Clinton Wins?
I have a bad feeling. I don't know why, logic tells me a Clinton comeback is about as likely as Cheney suddenly announcing he'll run for President.Maybe it was Obama gloomily telling reporters, "Remember New Hampsire." Maybe it's the fact...more »
Posted on February 29, 2008 9:28 AM
Cunningham to Endorse Hillary?
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=75014288(link to audio)NPR thought it was fine to repeat "Barack Hussein Obama" over and over, and didn't ask any obvious follow-up questions to Cunningham's assertions that he was simply calling Barack by his full name, like all Presidents.A question that...more »
Posted on February 28, 2008 9:37 AM
Obama in San Antonio
Today, I went to volunteer for Obama's first appearance in San Antonio. Obama was coming to a small area in the west side of San Antonio. There were Hillary signs in some of the local shops, so I think Obama...more »
Posted on February 19, 2008 5:55 PM
-
Ha!
I'll catch a ride to Heaven on my flying pig because Hell just froze over...
(too many mixed metaphors?)
Posted at May 13, 2008 1:00 PM in response to Polls Give Obama Big Lead In Oregon
-
On another note, myDD has a hilarious post on this:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/13/42138/3733
Obama's worst nightmare just happened.
by DTaylor, Tue May 13, 2008 at 04:21:38 AM ESTThe one single thing most likely to lose Obama the election has just occurred ...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2008/05/12/AR2008051202554. html?referrer=digg
One of Hillary's PLEDGED DELEGATES defected to Obama.
How is this bad for Obama you say?
It opens up every PLEDGED DELEGATE to insider politics.
If that occurs Obama may face a situation where its insider politics and the party chooses who the party wants.
Hillary Clinton has the majority of the Democratic party votes.
This cycle is stranger and stranger and stranger...
Posted at May 13, 2008 12:53 PM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
Really?
I'm not sure I buy this argument.
If Hillary does NOT concede, are we supposed to go to a floor fight at the convention? The delegates (pledged or otherwise) have no power to decide "in good conscience" to end this?
Or, in my other example, if Obama is revealed to be a mass-murderer, we're stuck with him?
No. That's why it's flexible: The situation has changed from when Maryland voted.
Posted at May 13, 2008 12:52 PM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
Thanks for posting that. I just actually read the link (novel idea).
This actually has implications beyond Johnson:
"Some Clinton delegates were chosen by voters at the ballot. Others, such as Johnson, were selected in consultation with the Clinton campaign by the Maryland Democratic State Central Committee, party spokesman David Paulson said.
But Paulson said that pledged delegates are under no obligation to stick by their candidate and that Johnson is free to defect if he chooses.
"The freedom to change your mind or change your vote does exist," Paulson said. "They're not like superdelegates, but they do have this flexibility."
Obama swamped Clinton in Maryland, capturing 61 percent of the vote statewide and 79 percent of the vote in Prince George's County. Given the results in Maryland and elsewhere, Johnson said, the Maryland party would be unenthusiastic about the November election if Obama were not the nominee.
A decision by O'Malley or Mikulski to release all of Maryland's Clinton delegates could be the start of a national wave to unify behind Obama, Johnson said.
"If we do that, I think we could shift some other states and bring the race to an end," he said.
Johnson's call was rejected by some Clinton's other supporters in the state. Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for Mikulski, said the Maryland senator "remains 100 percent behind Senator Clinton."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/12/AR2008051202554.html
Posted at May 13, 2008 12:29 PM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
aw, crap.
Wrong thread.
Apologies. (but maybe it will distract from Yilla the Racist.)
Posted at May 13, 2008 12:19 PM in response to ABC/WaPo Poll: Obama Ahead Of McCain
-
Maybe people should read the link.
This actually has implications beyond Jackson:
"Some Clinton delegates were chosen by voters at the ballot. Others, such as Johnson, were selected in consultation with the Clinton campaign by the Maryland Democratic State Central Committee, party spokesman David Paulson said.
But Paulson said that pledged delegates are under no obligation to stick by their candidate and that Johnson is free to defect if he chooses.
"The freedom to change your mind or change your vote does exist," Paulson said. "They're not like superdelegates, but they do have this flexibility."
Obama swamped Clinton in Maryland, capturing 61 percent of the vote statewide and 79 percent of the vote in Prince George's County. Given the results in Maryland and elsewhere, Johnson said, the Maryland party would be unenthusiastic about the November election if Obama were not the nominee.
A decision by O'Malley or Mikulski to release all of Maryland's Clinton delegates could be the start of a national wave to unify behind Obama, Johnson said.
"If we do that, I think we could shift some other states and bring the race to an end," he said.
Johnson's call was rejected by some Clinton's other supporters in the state. Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for Mikulski, said the Maryland senator "remains 100 percent behind Senator Clinton."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/12/AR2008051202554.html
Posted at May 13, 2008 12:18 PM in response to ABC/WaPo Poll: Obama Ahead Of McCain
-
Sure.
But if a member of the electoral college changed his or her vote to Gore to protest the Bush debacle, I wouldn't complain, and the country would be better off.
Again: At a gut level, I understand the emotion. We want to believe this a a democracy, where our votes are somehow directly tied to the process.
But that's just not the reality. Perhaps we need to change the nomination process, and the electoral college. I'm actually fine with that.
But to argue against the PERSON seems unfair. Again, people who have problems with the rules should write and call Howard Dean, not Jack B. Johnson.
Posted at May 13, 2008 10:21 AM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
typo - there would be NO delegates.
And to clarify, If someone wants to switch from Obama to Clinton, that's fair too.
Posted at May 13, 2008 9:47 AM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
Wow, a lot of hand-wringing going on here.
Look, there is NOTHING saying a delegate cannot change their mind. That's why in caucuses it's important to pick someone you trust.
This is NOT a purely democratic process. If it was, there would be not delegates, just a straight national vote on who would be our Democratic nominee. If people REALLY feel strongly about this, write Dean, and have the DNC scrap the whole nomination process and create a new one.
But, for now, it is how it is. If Obama is discovered to be mass-murderer and refuses to step-down, the Delegates have the right, no, the RESPONSIBILITY to pick someone else.
Maybe this Delegate thinks Hillary is hurting the Democratic party's chances in November. Maybe he's putting the interest of the party above his own.
Don't be so quick to judge, and if a delegate wants to switch from Hillary to Obama - they are welcome to.
Posted at May 13, 2008 9:45 AM in response to Pledged Delegate For Hillary Switches To Obama
-
hmm, don't think Obama is planning on getting all 150 delegates in a week (although it IS possible).
By May 20, they WILL have a majority of the pledged delegates:
Obama: 1,592 pledged delegates. Majority: 1,627.
35 pledged delegates to go.
Then the Supers will really start coming!Posted at May 12, 2008 5:42 PM in response to Obama Camp Says They're 150 Delegates From Clinching Nomination

