- : Microtrendic
- : Demicrotrendcratic
- : http://www.burson-marsteller.com/About_Us/Global_Leadership/Lists/GlobalLeadership/DispForm.aspx?ID=1&nodeName=Global%20Leadership&SubTitle=Mark%20J.%20Penn
- : Microtrending candidates to microsuccesses for years. Currently microtrending for the next President of the Microtrendic States of America, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Excuse me: United. I mean United States of America.
- : http://www.microtrending.com/ http://www.hillaryclinton.com/ http://www.nationalreview.com/
- : Microtrends ... It Takes a Village ... A Charge To Keep
- : "Winning Democratic primaries is not a qualification or a sign of who can win the general election. If it were, every nominee would win because every nominee wins Democratic primaries."
-
Of course I understood the basics. The issue is not that I didn't understand the basics. The issue is that I (wisely) did not act upon my knowledge of the basics.
You see, there are more campaigns that have won while understanding the basics and acting upon that understanding than there are campaigns that have won while understanding the basics but not acting upon that understanding.
Therefore, campaigns that understand the basics and act upon that understanding are a macrotrendic group, and therefore are utterly doomed to failure.
Meanwhile, campaigns that understand the basics but did not act upon that understanding are a microtrendic group. And that, my friends, that is exactly why Senator Hillary Clinton will be the next President of the United States of America.
This raises serious questions about Senator Obama.
Posted at May 8, 2008 12:33 PM in response to Mark Penn Denies Not Knowing The Basics About Dem Primaries
-
This misses, and mischaracterizes, the entire reason for my resignation. It was not due to impropriety or incompetence.
Rather, it was a decisive and insightful strategic maneuver: Campaign directors who do not resign in the middle of a race represent an overwhelming portion of campaign directors in general. Therefore, that is a macrotrendic category, and thus doomed to failure.
Very few campaign directors resign in the middle of a race. This therefore represents a microtrendic category, and thus is one more nail in the coffin of the Obama campaign, moving Senator Clinton one step closer to her unavoidable and overwhelming victory.
This raises serious questions about Senator Obama.
Posted at April 6, 2008 7:06 PM in response to BREAKING - Mark Penn Resigning
-
Do you have any idea what the population of Texas is? Twenty-four million. Twenty-four million!
That is so absurdly macrotrendic as to need no additional commentary.
This raises serious questions about Senator Obama.
Posted at March 30, 2008 2:21 AM in response to Obama Camp Declares Victory In Texas Conventions And Overall State Contest
-
How silly.
This so-called "poll" was given to over a thousand -- literally over a thousand -- people. It is therefore clearly macrotrendic, and thus is utterly irrelevant.
Meanwhile, Senator Clinton is unilaterally dominating all of the important microtrendic categories, such as left-handed rodeo clowns aged 83-86 or 88 and older. Given forcefully cogent facts like that, silly so-called "polls" like the one in this post just show Senator Clinton's incontrovertible dominance of this race in an even more clear light.
Posted at March 29, 2008 3:23 PM in response to Gallup: Obama Up 7 Points Over Hillary
-
But the fact that Hillary has not yet been able to win the nomination raises no concerns at all.
That is exactly correct. I can see that you are an astute individual. Are you interested in a job at a highly prestigious polling and public relations firm?Posted at March 27, 2008 9:45 AM in response to Obama Regains Lead in the Gallup Daily Tracking
-
There are hundreds - literally hundreds - of Superdelegates. They are therefore a macrotrendic group, and therefore completely irrelevant.
Meanwhile, as Senator Clinton is completely dominating all of the significant microtrendic categories, such as historical village chimneysweep reenactors aged 22 years and younger with Hallervorden-Spatz Syndrome and previous year's adjusted gross income of $132,000 or above, any schoolchild can easily see that Senator Clinton's rapidly approaching election as the next President of the United States of America is a fait accompli.
Posted at March 27, 2008 9:41 AM in response to Hillary Super-Delegates In Washington State Wavering
-
What are you talking about? "macrotrendic." lol I'm a person who NEVER GAVE TO ANY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGN until now in the month of March.
You prove my point. "People who have never given to any candidate's campaign" is, quite clearly, a macrotrendic category, and therefore is utterly irrelevant.Meanwhile, one quite simply cannot overstate the importance of the various microtrendic groups which are being completely dominated by Senator Clinton - for example, "ambidextrous lion tamers", "widowers aged 25 years or younger with real estate holdings between 9.5 and 9.8 acres", and of course the ever-important "people with eleven or more fingers from Missouri and/or Massachusetts, not including Barnstable County, Massachusetts".
This raises serious concerns about Senator Obama.
Posted at March 24, 2008 8:44 AM in response to Obama Nears 2 MILLION DONORS!!!!!!!
-
Two million? That is macrotrendic. This proves that Senator Obama is quixotically pursuing irrelevant macrotrendic groups. Meanwhile, Senator Clinton has wisely and forcefully obtained the clear upper hand in all of the decisive microtrendic categories.
This raises serious concerns about Senator Obama.
Posted at March 23, 2008 9:11 PM in response to Obama Nears 2 MILLION DONORS!!!!!!!
-
It raises serious questions about you and your senior role in the Clinton campaign that we find you down here plugging your theories in the lowly blogs.
When your job is to get a person elected, and everyone already knows that that person is clearly and indubitably going to get elected, you are blessed with a healthy heaping of free time.Posted at March 22, 2008 8:28 PM in response to Before Obama/Richardson Took the Stage
-
If that is so, then why is she losing? Why have more people chosen Obama rather than Clinton?
You have a strange definition of "losing". Senator Clinton has been dominating in all of the significant microtrends, such as Latino women above the age of 76 in non-caucus states, self-described liberal Republicans with five or seven (but not six) children, and the ever-important bloc of Hungarian-American polyglots from Delaware and/or Louisiana with income between $32,363 and $33,752.Meanwhile, Senator Obama is squandering his resources on wooing meaningless, insignificant macrotrendic groups, such as "voters" and "people".
This raises serious questions about Senator Obama.
Posted at March 22, 2008 7:45 PM in response to Reverse thinking on Obama / Clinton
