Perhaps you're missing the part where Clinton's team has no real credibility - on this or any other issue?

Why are you confusing what they say with any sort of reasonable analysis of the situation? They are liars. Lying hacks. It's their job to do so, but this group has taken the hacking to a whole new level.

Posted at May 30, 2008 1:56 PM in response to Ickes: Uncommitted Delegates Must Stay Uncommitted

Isn't it obvious? Some of her supporters are, shall we say, delicate flowers, who need to be softly let down instead of outright rejected.

Apparently.

It's rather ridiculous, you didn't see McCain's crew babying the Romney folks, after he dropped out of the race in heavy debt to his campaign. Sheesh

Posted at May 8, 2008 6:49 PM in response to Obama's Super-Del Whip: Many Super-Dels Back Obama, But Won't Go Public

Okay, so, I read that article, and which Clinton supporters are saying she should stay in?

I mean, I know you couldn't have written this post - with that heading - based upon the words of Lanny f*cking Davis, the most embarrassing hack on Hillary's team? He's a surrogate for her campaign, not a 'backer.'

Anonymous sources who aren't willing to go on the record aren't really a strong vote of confidence for Hillary, are they?

Posted at May 7, 2008 6:19 PM in response to More Calls For Hillary To Drop Out, But Some Congressional Backers Stand Firm

He just doesn't 'get' that people WANT to be lied to, and deceived, about saving money?

It will not happen. The consumer will save no money under the McCain/Clinton plan. Why you folks either cannot understand the economics of an inelastic market, or just don't care about lying to voters, I will never understand.

Posted at May 2, 2008 6:06 PM in response to Hillary Airs Another Indiana Ad Hitting Obama On Gas Tax

Well, notorious Troll, why don't you link to a refutation? 'cuz, yaknow, the other side can provide many, many examples of economists who will patiently explain to you the inelasticity of the Summer gasoline market.

Posted at May 2, 2008 1:38 PM in response to Audio Of Hillary: Are Members Of Congress "With Us Or Against Us" On Gas Tax?

But, you do realize that there's no way in hell that Congress is going to pass either the tax cut OR the windfall tax on the oil companies? And that Bush wouldn't sign either one?

Jeez

It's shameless pandering. It's not an actual plan. It's a plan designed to buy your vote. She might as well say 'I think the gov't ought to give everyone 100 dollars, vote for me!!!!'

Posted at May 2, 2008 1:33 PM in response to Audio Of Hillary: Are Members Of Congress "With Us Or Against Us" On Gas Tax?

The fact that Clinton supporters across the net have latched on to this as proof that she cares about the 'common man' is really, really revealing; of the nature of ignorance, and how it can affect an election.

The funny thing is that the vast majority of them don't care if it's pandering, or even truthful; they don't mind if she has to lie to win. Pretty sad.

Posted at May 2, 2008 1:22 PM in response to Audio Of Hillary: Are Members Of Congress "With Us Or Against Us" On Gas Tax?