Perhaps not much.

They may live to regret that call, and the ensuing "nothing is changed after tonight" commentary.

Posted at May 6, 2008 8:40 PM in response to Meanwhile, In Indiana...

That was, of course, a reply to Gotalife, above, who will still be telling us Obama's toast long after he wins the election in November.

Posted at May 5, 2008 11:10 PM in response to AP/Ipsos: Hillary Takes Seven-Point National Lead Over Obama, Both Beat McCain

(Plane pulls to a stop)
Dr. Rumack opens cockpit door: "I just want to tell you both: Good luck. We're all counting on you."

Posted at May 5, 2008 11:09 PM in response to AP/Ipsos: Hillary Takes Seven-Point National Lead Over Obama, Both Beat McCain

It will be very interesting to see which of these juvenile, anonymous trolls have the courage to keep posting here under the same usernames if and when Obama wraps up the nomination and the presidency.

Any bets?

Posted at May 3, 2008 12:22 AM in response to Poll: Clinton Ahead By Seven In Indiana

That claim and line of attack is so profoundly dumb on so many levels.

But by all means, please do keep it up :) If there's one thing America will care about at the voting booth, it's that the McCain campaign and its GOP surrogates are claiming his opponent has received the blessing of Hamas.

Posted at April 26, 2008 12:43 PM in response to McCain Campaign: Associating Obama With Terrorists Is Fair Game

Actually, that's the bottom line.

Clinton may whine that Obama outspending her is why he pulled so close in PA, but he could only do that because Obama's fundraising is so superior. It's an advantage that is part and parcel of campaigning, and it will serve him in good stead in the general.

Posted at April 22, 2008 8:35 PM in response to Hillary Campaign: Obama Has Spent Over $11 Million On Ads In Pennsylvania

Obama is the one who promised he would change politics and not run ads like the one I pointed out above.

Really? Now that's a claim I'd like to see some backup on.

Granted, you're a little slippery about your claim (what characteristic about the above ad are you discussing?). But I'd like to see proof Obama promised not to run a certain type of ad (in the ballpark of what's being discussed here) in the first place, and we'll go from there.

Posted at April 18, 2008 11:18 AM in response to Hillary: Tough Questions At Debate "Nothing Like The Pressures You Face Inside White House"

Do you honestly not get the difference between going after dishonest statements a candidate actually makes (and gets caught red handed making), and just making shit up?

The largest principle you seem capable of bringing to bear in this debate is "revenge".

Posted at April 18, 2008 11:13 AM in response to Hillary: Tough Questions At Debate "Nothing Like The Pressures You Face Inside White House"

Actually, the larger issue is whether Obama supporters are right to decry the stupid questions in the last debate.

You tried to make a "larger issue" by putting words in Obama's mouth, and then when you found the actual quote (and it didn't back you up) you kept pretending Obama was being hypocritical.

For your reading enjoyment:
http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/straw.htm

Posted at April 18, 2008 11:11 AM in response to Hillary: Tough Questions At Debate "Nothing Like The Pressures You Face Inside White House"

Says who?

First, radical Clinton supporters bashed Obama because he wasn't tough enough.

Then, when he fought back against Clinton's overwhelming and self-admitted "kitchen sink" strategy, Obama is derided by those selfsame folks as being too negative.

Perhaps Clinton supporters should just go have a meeting and get their arguments together.

Posted at April 18, 2008 11:08 AM in response to Hillary: Tough Questions At Debate "Nothing Like The Pressures You Face Inside White House"