If he was able to reverse himself FROM HIS ORIGINAL POSITION, he can certainly reverse himself BACK TO HIS ORIGINAL POSITION.

Hissy fit is an interesting term. Is that what you were doing when you were flogging Hillary for her war vote. It's not as if her vote would have changed the start of the war, just like Obama's vote won't "stop the bill."

The MEANS justify the ENDS. It's the journey. Stand for something.

Posted at July 3, 2008 8:33 PM in response to Obama Reiterates: Combat Troops Out Of Iraq In 16 Months

Senator Obama said he wanted to run a different kind of campaign. Appealing to our better half was part of that difference. He wanted to stay above politics and speak to the issues. That was what I understood him to mean when he spoke of a different kind of politics.

As soon as he secured the nomination he began to practice politics as usual with the bullsh*t notion that you have to tact to the middle. We are not a centrist country. We are, in fact, a liberal country.

Senator Obama does not get to speak of a new kind of politics when it suits him, and then employ the old kind of politics when it suits him. He either stands for something, or he stands for nothing.

So, yes, we hold him to account. That is what you do when someone is walking away from their ideals.

Posted at July 3, 2008 8:25 PM in response to Obama Reiterates: Combat Troops Out Of Iraq In 16 Months

When will the stoopid people (business losers included) realize that the economy always goes in the crapper under Republiscum rule?

Posted at July 3, 2008 4:46 PM in response to It's Olympics Time and President Bush Thinks He Is In a Job Losing Competition

Hold them to the fire when they transgress. That's the only time it matters. That's when their goals are in jeopardy. Otherwise, what's the frigg'n point?

Posted at July 3, 2008 1:06 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

Why don't you visit this web-site more often. There have been numerous time-lines of McStain's positions. Let's not become the Faux Noise of the internet by never looking at our own candidates' failures. I thought we were more adult than that.

Posted at July 3, 2008 1:04 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

At the time of Hillary's war vote, she was the presumptive nominee and her husband was essentially the head of the party. I don't recall you cutting her such slack with her war vote.

Posted at July 3, 2008 1:02 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

I'm sorry. If fact checking a candidates position over time not news? Then you don't really care about McStain flippy-flops, either. How do you know where one stands on the issues if they stand on both sides? When did Obamaniacs become STOOPID?

Posted at July 3, 2008 1:00 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

It's called LEADERSHIP! Or do you all give Speaker Pelousy and Senator Gread a pass because, well, they won't get the 60 votes, blah, blah, blah. Don't recall you using the same logic regarding Hillary's war vote. But then, that wasn't Snowbama.

Posted at July 3, 2008 12:58 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

Maybe because the Constitution MATTERS. Or don't you care about the Rule of Law?

Posted at July 3, 2008 12:56 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA

That's right. Take your eyes OFF THE CONSTITUTION and place your eyes on the ball.

Without the CONSTITUTION there is no ball.

When did you become brainless?

Posted at July 3, 2008 12:54 PM in response to A Time-line Of Obama's Statements On FISA