It's too bad her electability doesn't extend to her own party.

Posted at May 9, 2008 2:44 PM in response to Hillary Campaign Emails Out "Electability" Power-Point To All House Dems

Electability? She has negatives over 50%.

"Obama can't close the deal"? Why can't Clinton "close the deal"? Why has she been behind from the very beginning? If "closing the deal" is the standard, he comes much much closer than she does.

No one believes the Dem candidate is actually going to win these "tough, red-leaning" districts anyway, or these red states she's winning. In the general election, they're going to be exactly that: Red.

Posted at May 9, 2008 1:20 PM in response to Hillary Campaign Emails Out "Electability" Power-Point To All House Dems

Fogu, you keep up this act like you might be convinced to switch to Obama if us supporters were just nice to you.

No one believes it. You've never like him. You won't like him. It has nothing to do with us. It has everything to do with you.

Sorry you wasted $50.

Posted at May 9, 2008 12:29 PM in response to ABC: Obama Overtakes Hillary Among Super-Delegates

When will you Obamabot peons learn? It's not about who has the most superdelegates, pledged delegates, or the popular vote! It's doesn't matter who the voters or the Party wants to be the nominee!

What's important is to acknowledge that Queen Hillary is entitled to the White House. You see, last year she was "inevitable". That's a sort of verbal contract which obligates the Party to turn the nomination over to her whether they want to or not.

Also, non-college educated whities are all racist! Can't you see?! Why can't anyone see?!!

Posted at May 9, 2008 12:27 PM in response to ABC: Obama Overtakes Hillary Among Super-Delegates

"I'm fogu, blah blah blah....

Cult, blah blah blah....

Kool-aid, blah blah blah....

Deception, blah blah blah....

Obamabots pick on me, blah blah blah...."

Posted at May 8, 2008 1:01 PM in response to Report: Top Hillary Supporter Harvey Weinstein Threatened Pelosi

I'm guessing there's nothing really against the rules about a donor expressing the conditions on which they give money.

It's just incredibly inappropriate, lacks all class, and gives the appearance that gov't can be bought.

It's also a bit clueless, because he's reportedly given about $400,000 over the last ten years or something. Obama raises that in small donations in a day.

So if Pelosi is really concerned about the money coming in, and you force her to choose a camp, which is she going to choose?

Posted at May 8, 2008 12:58 PM in response to Report: Top Hillary Supporter Harvey Weinstein Threatened Pelosi

Raw Story reports that Pelosi said "Don't ever threaten me again."

Go Nan!

Posted at May 8, 2008 12:25 PM in response to Report: Top Hillary Supporter Harvey Weinstein Threatened Pelosi

You're not unworthy. You're just sulking.

Posted at May 8, 2008 12:24 PM in response to Report: Top Hillary Supporter Harvey Weinstein Threatened Pelosi

Has no one slandered Obama in the last couple of months? I think any impartial observer would have to agree that many people associated with the Clinton campaign have slandered Obama.

If Clinton is the best nominee, why can't she "close the deal"? If she can't win the nomination of her own party how will she win the general election?

Posted at May 7, 2008 8:36 PM in response to More Calls For Hillary To Drop Out, But Some Congressional Backers Stand Firm

Chill out, Redux.

Anger is only the second stage of grief. You need to move on to Bargaining:

"Why can't Hillary be VP?"

Then Depression:

"I'm going to vote for McCain! This whole country sucks and everyone is so dumb!"

And finally Acceptence:

"Finally I get it!! I too can be part of the Obamanation!"

Posted at May 7, 2008 8:31 PM in response to More Calls For Hillary To Drop Out, But Some Congressional Backers Stand Firm