3/12/03, New York Times Op-Ed

'[N]o one can plausibly argue that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein will not significantly improve the stability of the region and the security of American interests and values....Isn't it more likely that antipathy toward the United States in the Islamic world might diminish amid the demonstrations of jubilant Iraqis celebrating the end of a regime that has few equals in its ruthlessness?' Didn't those who argued that the war 'would not significantly improve the stability of the region and the security of American interests and values,' and that 'antipathy toward the U. S. in the Islamic world' would skyrocket, have a point?'
3/18/03, Fox, "O'Reilly Factor"

O'Reilly: "All right, Senator, if you were president, what would you have done differently in the run-up to this war?"McCain: "Nothing."
O'Reilly: "Nothing?"McCain: "The president has handled this, in my view, skillfully."
3/24/03, MSNBC, "Hardball"

"There's no doubt in my mind that once these people are gone that we will be welcomed as liberators."
6/11/03, Fox News

Neil Cavuto: ...many argue the conflict isn't over.McCain: Well, then why was there a banner that said mission accomplished on the aircraft carrier? Look, the -- I have said a long time that reconstruction of Iraq would be a long, long, difficult process, but the conflict -- the major conflict is over, the regime change has been accomplished.
8/24/03, NBC, "Meet the Press"

NBC's TIM RUSSERT: "What must be done in Iraq right now?"SEN. MCCAIN: "SEN. JOHN McCAIN, (R-AZ): First, could I say, Tim, the men and women in the military are doing a superb job. To see these young people in 125-degree heat with body armor and equipment on, they're marvelous and they're well-led and they're doing a great job. The problem is that they don't have enough resources. There's not enough of them, and we are in a very serious situation, in my view, a race against time. We need to spend a whole lot more money to get the services back to the people. We need to get the electricity going, the fuel, the water. And unless we get that done and get it done pretty soon, we could face a very serious situation."
11/5/03, Remarks To Council On Foreign Relations

"To win in Iraq, we should increase the number of forces in-country, including Marines and Special Forces, to conduct offensive operations. I believe we must have in place another full division, giving us the necessary manpower to conduct a focused counterinsurgency campaign across the Sunni triangle that seals off enemy operating areas, conducts search and destroy operations and holds territory. Such a strategy would be the kind of new mission General Sanchez agreed would require additional forces. It's a mystery to me why they are not forthcoming. We cannot achieve our political goals as long as a strategic region of Iraq is in a state of fundamental insecurity."
11/30/03, Fox News

"We need more troops.... [W]e have to be much more robust and do and send whatever troops are necessary."
3/7/04, ABC News

"I'm confident we're on the right course. I'm confident that this is a very difficult and imperfect process, bringing democracy to countries that have never known democracy, fraught with secular differences as well as ethnic differences. It's very, very difficult. But I am confident that an imperfect democracy is what we'll get out of Iraq will be vastly superior to what the people of Iraq had prior to this."
4/11/04, Remarks At Media Availability

"I was there in last August and have said since then that we needed more troops, we need them very badly. We may be paying a price for not having had more troops there...."
4/14/04, Fox News, "Hannity and Colmes"

"[W]hen I was there in Iraq in August, I talked to [the] British. I talked to sergeant majors. I talked to colonels and captains. And I came back absolutely convinced that we needed more boots on the ground. These people warned me. They said, 'Look, if you don't have more soldiers here, you're going to lose control of this situation and you're going to face an insurgency some months from now.' I begged and pleaded that we send more troops. Secretary Rumsfeld said, 'Well, our commanders on the ground haven't asked for them.' It's not up to the commanders on the ground. It's up to the leadership of the country to make these decisions. That's why we elect them and have civilian supremacy. We're now facing a terrible insurgency. We can prevail, but we've got to have more people over there to get the job done."
4/22/04, Remarks To Council On Foreign Relations

"I have said since my visit to Iraq last August that our military presence is insufficient to bring stability to the country. We should increase the number of forces, including Marines and Special Forces, to conduct offensive operations. There is also a dire need for other types of forces, including linguists, intelligence officers, and civil affairs officers. We must deploy at least another full division, and probably more."
9/23/04, CNBC, "Capital Report,"

"I think that we need more troops in Iraq. I've thought that for a long time, election or no election. ... [I]'ve been asking since a year ago last August. So I'm not sure that the elections have a lot to do with it, but I've been saying since a year ago August that we needed more boots on the ground...."
4/28/04, CNN

"Senator Kerry and the president say we have to stay the course. We have to stay the course."
10/24/04, ABC News, "This Week"

"We've got to stay the course and I believe that's what President Bush is committed to."
12/5/04, Fox News, "Fox News Sunday"

"[T]he problem that we have here is that the Pentagon has been reacting to initiatives of the enemy rather than taking initiatives from which the enemy has to react to. Many of us, as long as a year and a half ago, said, 'You have to have more people there. You have to have more linguists. You have to have more special forces. You have to have' - and the Pentagon has reluctantly, obviously, gradually made some increases. And the problem, when you react, you have to extend people on duty there, which is terrible for morale. There's a terrific strain on Guard and reservists. If you plan ahead, then you don't have to do some of these things. The military is too small. The good news is we went into Fallujah and we dug then out of there. And I'm proud of the work. These men and women are magnificent. Their leadership is magnificent. The bad news is we allowed Fallujah to become a sanctuary to start with. So, yes, we need more troops. Yes, we have to win."
12/13/04, AP

When asked about his confidence in Rumsfeld's leadership on Iraq, McCain said, "I said no. My answer is still no. No confidence...I have strenuously argued for larger troop numbers in Iraq, including the right kind of troops -- linguists, special forces, civil affairs, etc." When asked if Rumsfeld was a liability to the Bush administration, McCain responded: "The president can decide that, not me."
2/20/05, NBC, "Meet the Press"

Tim Russert: Do you believe we have enough American troops on the ground right now?
John McCain: I think we have in numbers probably enough.
6/28/05, MSNBC, "Hardball"

"I think we need - I think we need more troops there ... because we're not staying once we attack and clear. We've got stay and expand."
6/28/05, Fox News

"And what the president did tonight is the most important thing. He laid out an articulate vision for victory in Iraq and why we need to stay the course."
6/29/05, CNN, "American Morning"

"I've thought for a long, long time, since the very beginning, that we needed more troops, and one of the reasons why we've experienced many of the difficulties we have is we didn't have enough boots on the ground"
8/14/05, Fox News, "Fox News Sunday"

"We not only don't need to withdraw, we need more troops there."
11/10/05, Speech to AEI

"To enhance our chances of success with this strategy and enable our forces to hold as much territory as possible, we need more troops. For this reason, I believe that current ideas to effect a partial drawdown during 2006 are exactly wrong. ... Instead of drawing down, we should be ramping up, with more civil-military soldiers, translators and counterinsurgency operations teams."
12/8/05, The Hill

"Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course."
2/26/06, ABC News

"We have made serious mistakes in Iraq, which have caused us enormous problems and we've paid consequences"
4/15/06, The Arizona Republic

"We've made mistakes, but we can win, and we must win."
5/29/06, New York Observer

"One of the things I would do if I were President would be to sit the Shiites and the Sunnis down and say, 'Stop the bullshit,'" said Mr. McCain, according to Shirley Cloyes DioGuardi, an invitee, and two other guests. McCain also criticized the Bush administration's lack of candor about the current situation there.
6/20/06, CBS, "Evening News"

"You know, I've always said that we needed more troops over there. I have said that for years."
6/20/06, Financial Times

McCain criticized the administration for not having enough troops in Iraq, saying it was "like the little Dutch boy with his thumb in the dike."
7/26/06, CNN, "Larry King Live"

"I think one of the biggest mistakes we made that we've paid a very heavy price for was not having enough boots on the ground. I said that three years ago."
9/24/06, CBS, "Face the Nation"

Bush had "laid out recently a pretty cogent argument why we must, quote -- I hate to use the phrase -- 'stay the course'"
11/17/06, New York Times

"In no other time are we more morally obliged to speak the truth to our country, as we best see it, than in a time of war. So let me say this, without additional combat forces we will not win this war."
12/7/06, Chicago Tribune

"We must have more troops over there, maybe 20,000 more Marines, and 80,000 Army. We have to have a big enough surge that we can get Baghdad under control."
1/14/07, New York Times

Mr. McCain embarked on a high-profile television tour announcing his support for Mr. Bush's move. In an interview, he said he would have preferred that the White House send in even more troops, and noted that he had pressed this position on the White House, unsuccessfully until now, for more than two years.
1/24/07, CNN

Speaking in support of the President's State of the Union speech in which he emphasized support of the proposed escalation of 21,000 additional forces in Iraq, McCain said, "I'm sticking with the president."
2/4/07, ABC, This Week

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Yet you are doubtful that 20,000 troops is enough. Aren't you?MCCAIN: I'm worried...I would have liked to have seen more, as you know, but apparently, and it's quite a commentary, this is all we got. This is, as I said earlier, all in.
3/3/07, The Salt Lake Tribune

President Bush announced last month a plan to send an additional 21,500 military members to Iraq in an attempt to quell worsening sectarian violence. While expressing some skepticism over whether the recent "surge" is enough, McCain said military leaders have ensured him the new plan is sound.
5/3/07, MSNBC/Politico Republican Presidential Debate

Moderator: Do you need anything beyond what the president has now to win the war?McCain: Now I think it's on the right track.
7/19/07, Boston Globe

"At the Globe yesterday, McCain also talked at length about Iraq, reiterating his support for the president's plan to try to secure Baghdad with an additional 20,000 combat troops."
Nov/Dec 2007, Foreign Affairs

"The recent years of mismanagement and failure in Iraq demonstrate that America should go to war only with sufficient troop levels and with a realistic and comprehensive plan for success. We did not do so in Iraq, and our country and the people of Iraq have paid a dear price."
1/6/08, Fox News GOP Presidential Forum

"I know that I have been an agent of change. I'm proud to have been one of those who played a key role in bringing about one of the most important changes in recent years, and that was the change in strategy from a failing strategy in Iraq pursued by Secretary Rumsfeld, which was needlessly causing sacrifice of our most precious American treasure."
4/2/08, Think Progress

"No one has supported President Bush on Iraq more than I have."
4/6/08, Fox News, "Fox News Sunday"

"I've always said, Chris, this is long and hard and tough. We're paying a huge penalty for four years of a failed strategy that I fought hard against, and I believe this strategy has succeeded and will succeed and can succeed. But it's long and hard and tough."
4/15/08, MSNBC, "Hardball"

"But the point is that I think we are succeeding. The war was mishandled terribly for nearly four years by Donald Rumsfeld and this administration. I fought against it. I argued against. And I argued for the new strategy, which is succeeding."
3/25/08, AP Worldstream

"I'm offering them the record of having objected strenuously to a failed strategy for nearly four years. That I argued against and fought against and said that the secretary of defense of my own party, and my own president, I had no confidence in. That's how far I went in advocating the new strategy that is succeeding."
















a quick explanation: we've moved this over to its own separate post, meaning we've taken it out of the original post where many of you commented.
your comments are still there attached to the original post.
July 28, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should anyone be looking for that post or the comments, it is located right here.
July 28, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok - correct me if I'm wrong, but I could swear that one reason The Surge seemed to be working was because we were paying insurgent leaders what amounts to protection money.
We were paying them not to shoot at us.
July 28, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am amazed at how little the press has covered the fact that part of General Petraeus's plan to put down the surge has involved heavy payoffs to factions.
Instead of fighting our troops, they are taking the money and waiting.
July 28, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I am amazed at how little the press has covered the fact that part of General Petraeus's plan to put down the surge has involved heavy payoffs to factions. Instead of fighting our troops, they are taking the money and waiting."
*nods*
Also grossly overlooked (or outright ignored) is the fact that the "The Surge" either indirectly or as it's inexplicit aim, catalyzed and gave cover to the accelerated ethnic cleansing of Baghdad and greater Iraq. What was once a majority Sunni city in Baghdad is now 75% Shia. Violence dropped when there were less people to kill and drive from their homes. Nearly 1 million Iraqis are internally displaced.
I recommend everyone read Juan Cole's post the other day, it helps unpack the myths that have dominated the discussion over the last few years.
http://www.juancole.com/2008/07/social-history-of-surge.html
July 28, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Money Surge.
I think that was also McCain's idea.
July 28, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes...
McCain's Purge and $$.$$urge
July 29, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's true. Why did so many Sunni insurgents switch to our side? Hundreds of thousands of dollars--bribes.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article2413200.ece
July 28, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm new to this timeline. Will someone explain to me why some feature a picture of Bush, some of McCain, some have a green check and some have a red "X"?
July 28, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the pictures of Bush with a check mark indicate those statements by McCain in support of Bush's Iraq policy, while those with an 'X' indicate McCain's comments criticizing Bush's Iraq strategy. The pictures of McCain indicate statements by the senator in which he is lying about his previous positions on Iraq.
July 28, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think McCain has been quite consistent in his focus on TACTICS calling for more troops.
The real debate is over STRATEGY- how far back was McCain calling for regime change, permanent bases?
Krauthammer summed it up brilliantly this week:
July 28, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neither side of which addresses the glaring issue of WHETHER OR NOT THE IRAQI PEOPLE AND THEIR GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY WANT US TO CONTINUE THE OCCUPATION OF THEIR HOMELAND.
Christ Almighty how these conehead facists do truly amaze. What if it was Texas and the troops, tanks and guns in the streets weren't ours?
But of course, that would never happen.
July 28, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now we know why they're in-SURGEnts?
July 28, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
The other thing that no one mentions with regard to the "success of the surge" is the amount of ethnic cleansing that has gone on in Iraq.
July 28, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm confused. McStain seems to complain a lot about the war throughout the time-line, and yet the Idiot-in-Chief has ALWAYS said he listened to the Generals on the ground. Why has McStain so consistently questioned the patriotism of the Generals? Why has he so consistently denigrated the performance of our troops?
Oh yeah, that only happens when the Democrats question the prosecution of the war.
July 28, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain consistently says he agrees with Bush, thinks Bush is doing the right thing, thinks it will work, etc. OR that he'd like to see more not fewer troops in-country, sent in-country, committed in future (until adopting the Obama/Maliki timetable this month).
I think we're going easy on him by looking at the latter comments as a break from Bush. They may be breaks from Bush, but they're breaks in favor of escalation, not de-escalation, intensification of what isn't working, not a shift to something that might. Moreover, they bespeak a reality-free commitment to war in perpetuity regardless of operational readiness of our military services or the practical situation on the ground in Iraq.
Along those lines, a data set like this would make a nice "did you know?" email to forward to 8 or 800,000 of one's dearest friends and fellow citizens.
July 28, 2008 5:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
3/7/04, ABC News
Link this to any four year pre-invasion period in Iraqi modern history and compare that to the post invasion Iraqi deaths, the average daily hours of electricity in Baghdad, infant mortality, availability of water, displaced families, or the homogenization of neighborhoods.
Who was it that said, "it's going swimmingly"?
So now McCain, the one who uttered those "I am confident" words, wants us to vote for his "experience"?
July 29, 2008 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink