The Meaning of Obama's Lunch Visit
The president-elect is headed to the weekly Senate Democratic lunch meeting today to make his case for a release of the second half of the financial bailout money. It sounds like news -- after all, as the AP reports, Barack Obama is "putting his persuasion skills to a high-stakes test" with today's visit. But what makes the lunch date in itself significant? Here's my take.
These Tuesday lunches, held by both Democrats and Republicans, are a well-known ritual in the Capitol, often allowing senators to air their most candid concerns about the agenda -- whether on or off the record -- with the passel of reporters who wait outside the door to the meeting room. Obama's appearance as the guest of honor at a Tuesday lunch, then, is a symbol of his dizzying rise. For some Dems, this will be the first time it truly sinks in that the guy who started out ranked 98th out of 100 in the Senate is now calling the shots. In a building where seniority rules the day, this is bound to sting on some level.
Also, Senate lunch appearances are a key part of the president's public-relations role. George Bush dined with the Senate on the eve of the pivotal immigration vote, but otherwise left the mealtime courtship to Vice President Cheney or other White House aides. That Obama is making the trip before his inauguration is an undeniable show of respect for Congress.
One note about the Tuesday lunches: They are possibly the most choreographed element of the highly staged congressional work week. If Obama wants to answer questions, look for him to head to the microphones set up in the Senate's "Ohio Clock Corridor," located just outside the formal chamber. If he doesn't want to answer questions ... he'll be gone.















Like herding cats
Never too soon to unleash Rahmbo
January 13, 2009 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually liked and think obama's lunch visit to that 12th street hotdog stand was more significant. He apparently will be going to lunch on the streets of dc once a week or so. Basically, the reason is to stay in touch with average americans. Very refreshing.
January 13, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ben's Chili Bowl is hardly a "hotdog stand"! I take great exception to a place of such storied tradition being written off as something so trivial.
In all seriousness, Ben's has been around for ever and it's probably the best known if not outright the best chili in DC.
That and it's only a couple blocks from the 14th St. Ho Stroll And All You Can Smoke Open Air Drug Market(tm)
January 13, 2009 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
No "probably" about it -- hands down, the absolute best (now that I'm no longer a DC resident ;-P )!
January 13, 2009 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
His grabbing a bite at Ben's is freighted with racial significance having (in part) nostalgic undertones.
When Ben's opened on U Street in 1958, "Washington was officially segregated, and U Street was known as "Black Broadway." Many jazz greats of the day, such as Duke Ellington, Miles Davis, and Nat King Cole, would stop by the restaurant when they performed at U Street clubs." (The eatery is famous enough to have a Wiki site, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben's_Chili_Bowl)
You can read all about how the restaurant fed both cops and rioters in the 1968 conflagrations following the MLK assassination on various sites. If you get near 12th and U, drop in on Ben's (maybe for breakfast, starting at 6 http://www.benschilibowl.com/crazy_hours.html). And dress down, it may be Presidential but it ain't fancy!
January 14, 2009 5:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Loved this comment from the link:
Right now, I’m 99th in seniority in the minority party, so when I got here they handed me a toothbrush and said, hey Obama, go clean the bathrooms.
Great sense of humor.
Is seniority the only way to get "power" in Congress? Is there any sort of job performance evaluation that goes on (besides funning for re-election)? I appreciate that this question is probably hilariously laughable, but I started to wonder how Congress keeps track (if at all) of someone's performance as chair of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, for example.
Random example, of course, which has absolutely nothing to do with one of my Senators....
January 13, 2009 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is ALL seniority. And your party being the majority for you to head committees, which is why Leahy and Specter go back and forth as head of Judiciary.
January 13, 2009 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if you've been in the Senate for eleventy-thousand years, and can't remember your name, you're going to be the most powerful Senator?
How does one get on a particular committee in the first place? And there aren't any mechanisms to kick someone off a particular committee?
January 13, 2009 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
The House isn't quite as bad as the Senate for seniority, but both depend on who you know.
In the Senate, it's all seniority, all the time. You can get clearly age-hampered chairmen out (see: Robert Byrd on Appropriations), but it takes a bunch of senior Senators going to him to get him to step down.
January 13, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
But will Obama put in a new team, preferably not a line-up of Goldman Sachs retreads, to adminster it?
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/whos_running_tarp_you_might_not_wanna_know.php
January 13, 2009 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink