« Election Central Sunday Roundup | Home | Schumer: Franken Has Won Senate Race »

Richardson Withdraws Nomination To Be Secretary Of Commerce

Bill Richardson has announced that he is withdrawing his nomination to be President-Elect Obama's Commerce Secretary, due to an investigation of a political donor who has done business with the state of New Mexico, leaving the Obama cabinet-in-waiting now short by one member.

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," Richardson told Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

The last month has been been a rough time for the Democrats, with them becoming mired in ethics scandals before they even get to officially take control of the government.

Late Update: Barack Obama and Bill Richardson have released statements, both available after the jump.

Obama's statement:

It is with deep regret that I accept Governor Bill Richardson's decision to withdraw his name for nomination as the next Secretary of Commerce.Governor Richardson is an outstanding public servant and would have brought to the job of Commerce Secretary and our economic team great insights accumulated through an extraordinary career in federal and state office. It is a measure of his willingness to put the nation first that he has removed himself as a candidate for the Cabinet in order to avoid any delay in filling this important economic post at this critical time. Although we must move quickly to fill the void left by Governor Richardson's decision, I look forward to his future service to our country and in my administration.

Richardson's statement:

For nearly three decades, I have been honored to serve my state and our nation in Congress, at the U.N., as Secretary of Energy and as governor. So when the President-elect asked me to serve as Secretary of Commerce, I felt a duty to answer the call.I felt that duty particularly because America is facing such extraordinary economic challenges. The Department of Commerce must play an important role in solving them by helping to grow the new jobs and businesses America so badly needs.

It is also because of that sense of urgency about the work of the Commerce Department that I have asked the President-elect not to move forward with my nomination at this time.I do so with great sorrow. But a pending investigation of a company that has done business with New Mexico state government promises to extend for several weeks or, perhaps, even months.

Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact. But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process.Given the gravity of the economic situation the nation is facing, I could not in good conscience ask the President-elect and his Administration to delay for one day the important work that needs to be done.

So, for now, I will remain in the job I love, Governor of New Mexico, and will continue to work every day, with Lieutenant Governor Diane Denish, to make a positive difference in the lives of New Mexicans. I believe she will be a terrific governor in the future.I appreciate the confidence President-elect Obama has shown in me, and value our friendship and working partnership. I told him that I am eager to serve in the future in any way he deems useful. And like all Americans, I pray for his success and the success of our beloved country.


46 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Get Olympia Snowe on the phone RFN, and promise her all the gold in Fort Knox- if she will become Sec. of Commerce with no conditions. Then, put a Dem in her Senate seat. Make it happen.

user-pic

Either Olympia Snowe or Mrs. "yeah I work for Lynch but.....SO WHAT" Tyson to take that job.

user-pic

I respect Richardson even more with his doing this for the betterment of the administration and therefore the country.

I wonder if he decided this alone or if Obama confronted him?

user-pic

yeah, I for one, at this point, am far more willing to give people a chance when they express their willingness, right away, to put (at times, totally bullshit) process above their own personal needs and sense of self-regard. this sounds like something non-nefarious, even if it turns out to have been against statutes or campaign laws. at this point in time, I tend to assume that any given politician is looking for an easy way to get money, power they shouldn't have, or sex, drugs, influence through coercion. shame to lost a potentially very effective secretary in this area.

I was against Richardson for Pres. due to his documented, spotted relationship with women, and his at time inappropriate behavior with them. I hope he didn't willingly do anything he knew to be illegal. If he did, screw him, he was trying to be President. That would put him in worse than John Edwards territory, which is not a place you want to be. If he didn't, then this will be a loss for business and commerce, depending on who will replace him as nominee. But if he's exonerated, he should jump to the front of the line for future posts for which he is qualified. We've got to stop eating our own, its a different thing than merely keeping them in check via oversight & criticism.

user-pic

How come that wasn't caught in vetting?

user-pic

Excellent question.

user-pic

I'm sure they knew an investigation was ongoing, but decided it didn't merit disqualifying him.

Then Blago happens, and it changes the political zeitgeist. There also may have been changes in the investigation, due to the Blago coverage, or due to real developments in the case. The press certainly loves a vague association to build dramatic narratives.

user-pic

I think Richardson is doing the right thing and I respect him for doing it. Now, if Norm Coleman would only follow his example...

user-pic

Agreed...appoint a Republican senator to this post and replace them with a Democrat.

However, I take issue with the last paragraph of Eric's story:

"The last month has been been a rough time for the Democrats, with them becoming mired in ethics scandals before they even get to officially take control of the government."

What ethics scandals are they "mired in"? I think there are a few small ones (as either party always has)...but nothing affecting Obama, the party leadership, or the ability to accomplish things. Rangel, Blago...these are limited to the individuals themselves.

user-pic

Couple of thoughts:

1. Thank God that Obama didn't nominate Richardson for Secretary of State. This would have been a MUCH BIGGER deal with all the foreign policy crisis that we are facing. Now this will only be a one or 2 day story.

2. Thank God that Richardson withdrew NOW and not during his Senatorial hearing. Again this makes it a one or 2 day story as oppose to a long drawn out story.

user-pic

yes and yes. excellent points and good on Richardson. I must now eat crow b/c I really would've like Richardson for SoS back when that was being discussed.

user-pic

Hey, I'm a Democrat and I'm not mired in any ethical scandals.

user-pic

Anyone else feeling queezy about the AJ pick?

user-pic

""The last month has been been a rough time for the Democrats, with them becoming mired in ethics scandals before they even get to officially take control of the government."

Oh come on! That is straight from the Republican talking points. The only "rough time" is the one that Republicans want the media and public to think there is. You took the their bait, hook, line and sinker. Sad.

user-pic

Ah.  I was wondering why Richardson dropped the beard.  This surely explains it.  Gotta look clean-cut in front of the grand jury.

user-pic

Boy and people were really pushing him for sos... All lobbing groups for races and women group need to stay out of this and not push nobody....

user-pic

Obama used this more as a shot at Blagojevich as well. Richardson is getting out of the way even though he too professes his innocence in order to put the country first whereas Blago is putting himself first and making Illinois the focal point to political corruption.

I wonder if Obama would have weathered the storm with Richardson through the confirmation hearings before Blago's issues broke.

If Richardson is eventually exonerated I'm sure Obama will have a spot ready for him, and if's he's found to be at fault, then he shouldn't have had the position to begin with.

Snowe isn't going to happen, especially now that Franken looks like #59. Of course Burris is a mess and could end up not caucusing with the Dems, and probably voting out of spite and to make himself the story at every chance.

user-pic

So much for Obama's airtight vetting.

This really sucks, as Richardson would be a real asset in the Administration. If all this gets cleared up in his favor, maybe he can be tapped for some special position going forward.

user-pic

NOTHING is airtight.

You can vet and vet but still stuff can come up.

Again BETTER this happens NOW and thus it is a couple of days story than for it to happen LATER during a Senatorial hearing and THEN Richardson resigns.

user-pic

Don't make assumptions. Yes, Richardson could have left that detail out or the vetting missed it. It could also be possible that the Obama team was aware of it and confident that Richardson was innocent, decided to nominate him anyway. Maybe the investigation didn't take the turn they wanted or The O Team doesn't want another media created cloud of corruption that began with Blago - Remember how Rahm was "exonerated"? Now his commerce secretary? No thanks!

user-pic


"I look forward to his future service to our country and in my administration."
Sound like Richardson will have a job in Obama's ad. after this is all cleared up..........

user-pic

I tend to think so, if he's exonerated through the process, he will be up to replace any of the first wave of high level people who leave the admin. for whatever reason, which is not a bad spot to be in. In the meantime, he can work on his, um, whatever.

user-pic

Yeah he can be SoS in a year or two when Hillary steps down to start her 2012 campaign...she still wants the presidency.

user-pic

Bill Clinton is doin' a little dance right now.

Payback is a bitch.

user-pic

Actually Richardson set a precedent for Hillary to withdraw herself from consideration as SoS.

As reported by the Times, Hillary and Bill have their own pay to play scandal brewing. Since she will have a much higher profile and more sensitive job than Richardson, one has to wonder when and if, she'll do the right thing.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/washington/04clinton.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=Clinton&st=cse


user-pic

Hillary's not going to withdraw, yet. There's no investigation currently brewing. Yes it doesn't look particularly good for the incident that occurred, but it could also be chalked up to coincidence. Note, I'm not saying it's one thing or another. It's just too soon to tell either way.

As for Richardson's replacement, I agree with the poster above. Get Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins and take away the Republicans' filibuster weapon.

user-pic

Saw that, makes you wanna go hmmmmmmm?

user-pic

Hillary is NOT being investigated by a Grand Jury so I doubt seriously that she will withdraw her name.

user-pic

True. But perhaps she should be.

user-pic

And Mr. Bill. Co-sign big time.

user-pic

So if any type of contract goes to a political supporter they are thereafter barred from contributing to anyone but your opponent?

This type of contribution is ethically improper only if part of a pre-arranged deal.

Obama picked Hillary for SOS because -- contrary to his lies during the primary -- they have very similar foreign policy preferences. His are, if anything, much more hawkish and to the right than hers are.

I was in favor of Hillary staying in the Senate because I do not trust Obama not to knife her and because the SOS office is not a good match for her talents. She is very good at deciding what is the best policy and not so good at twisting arms to see that we get there.


user-pic

So if any type of contract goes to a political supporter they are thereafter barred from contributing to anyone but your opponent?

This type of contribution is ethically improper only if part of a pre-arranged deal.

Obama picked Hillary for SOS because -- contrary to his lies during the primary -- they have very similar foreign policy preferences. His are, if anything, much more hawkish and to the right than hers are.

I was in favor of Hillary staying in the Senate because I do not trust Obama not to knife her and because the SOS office is not a good match for her talents. She is very good at deciding what is the best policy and not so good at twisting arms to see that we get there.


user-pic

Just saw a post on KOS reminding that this was known back in December (WaPo article)

The question remains: Why didn't the Transition catch this before?????


Forget the Great Pastor Rick kerfuffle and whatever it was that was supposed to have the Left all a twitter before that, this is the first real screw up in an otherwise awesome transition.

user-pic

Well... looks like it's been reported since this past summer.

The Richardson withdrawal raises questions about the thoroughness of the Obama team’s vetting process, which had been touted as one of the most stringent ever. Stories about the investigation of the CDR contract and of the donations by David Rubin — the president of CDR and a major Democratic contributor — to the Richardson-linked political action committees have appeared in news reports at least since August. (from the NY Times)

My guess is the transition team was well aware of it but decided it was nothing to block his confirmation -- but things haven't gone that way.

user-pic

How about, they had a debt to pay to Richardson and Hispanics; and knew it wouldn't go anywhere?

user-pic

Just saw a post on KOS reminding that this was known back in December (WaPo article)

The question remains: Why didn't the Transition catch this before?????


Forget the Great Pastor Rick kerfuffle and whatever it was that was supposed to have the Left all a twitter before that, this is the first real screw up in an otherwise awesome transition.

user-pic

Let's be serious here. The WaPo had the news, it does not mean Obama and his team didn't know.

user-pic

Hillary's not withdrawing. Save your breath. The Senate takes care of its own

Likewise, Olympia Snowe is a pipe dream. Perhaps I've missed something, perhaps you guys have some inside information, but her vote in the Senate is worth far more than any Obama Cabinet position

user-pic

Does anyone know anything more about the charges against Richardson? Would a non-partisan observer see this as a plausible case?

Is the US Attorney for New Mexico pushing the investigation? As we all know, his predecessor--David Iglesias--lost his job because he would not 'speed up' corruption investigations against Democrats.

user-pic

Now you know why Big Bill refused to resign the Governorship until he was confirmed.

How'd you like to be LtGov Diane Denish this evening??? ¡El Patrón vuelve!

user-pic

Once in a while I try again; but trusting politicians doesn't get any easier.

user-pic

I'm very sad to see Richardson withdraw and really hope that he goes on to be exonerated at the end of the investigation.

I'm glad, however, that Richardson recognizes that, despite his own ambitions, his withdrawal is in the best interest of the party, the incoming administration, and the country. Too bad we can't say the same thing about certain other governors (who shall remain nameless).

user-pic

I'm in no position to pass judgement on Richardson, but the huge amounts of money it requires to be competitive in politics today is at the root of all the problems with our democracy. Until we fix that, nothing is going to change.

user-pic

"the huge amounts of money it requires to be competitive in politics today is at the root of all the problems with our democracy. Until we fix that, nothing is going to change."

-- Proof (if any were needed) that coffee table political wisdom has yet to catch up with what Obama did this year. Leverage today's technology to share the burden and collect the wealth nationwide, and the "huge amounts" stop being a cause for corruption and start being an engine of popular will.

user-pic

Hee hee hee, you mean "redistribute the wealth nationwide"?

Collection huge amounts of money nationwide will stop it being a cause for corruption? I guess that's why the Putin government's been such an engine of popular will.

Money corrupts. The myth that Obama's campaign was simply grannies the nation over forking over $100 from under the mattress will be a painful one to revise.

He's raised something around $1 billion, and the level of big donors is increasing for the inauguration - average $40K per donor for the inaugural committee. People will demand results for that money, and it's not a level playing field.

http://www.courant.com/news/elections/la-et-cause2-2009jan02,0,1794857.story

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-obama-moneydec05,0,6244688.story

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address