« Truth in Advertising? | Home | Carbon Tax Bill Offered in Congress, Days After Exxon CEO's Endorsement »

Franken Camp To Coleman: Cut Out The Delays

The Franken campaign is laying out its response to Norm Coleman's court request for how to conduct his lawsuit against the election result, which would involve a series of five mini-trials to individually test his various claims. Their answer: Let's have a regular trial instead.

In a conference call just now with reporters, lead Franken attorney Marc Elias said the campaign is filing their own proposed schedule that will use a conventional single trial -- which Elias said is consistent with the law -- in which Coleman could call witnesses and present evidence, and then would rest his case. Whereas the final one of Coleman's mini-trials would begin in late February, Elias said his own schedule could end by that point.

The problem here, Elias said, is that Coleman hasn't actually presented real evidence or much of a case so far, and is instead seeking to use these multiple trials as a venue to find something.

"We believe that Norm Coleman has a right to go to court, okay, because that's in the law," said Elias. "We don't believe that he has a right to delay, to use the process of going to court to delay the people of Minnesota from having representation in the United States Senate. Nor do we believe that he has a right to have his court challenge proceed in a multi-phase process that will span week after week after week, in an effort for him to try to turn up a rock some place and find some evidence."


7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Say "G'night," Norm.

You have no chance.

user-pic

He knows he has no chance. This is just spite, combined with a desire on the part of national Repubs to do everything they can to hamstring Obama and the Dems.

user-pic

The part where Coleman presents his evidence should be really short.

user-pic

hmmm, I dunno, if he just starts stamping his feet and saying "mine mine mine mine mine" (which, after all, is his only "evidence"), he could probably go on a good long while.

user-pic

Filibusters are only allowed in the Senate, of which Norm Coleman is no longer a part. ;-)

user-pic

Evidence? You mean losing by 225 votes after a painfully long recount isn't evidence?

user-pic

Coleman's stupidity grows more obvious by the day.
The harder he fights, the dumber he looks.

Leave a comment

Recommended Reader Posts

  • Unwritten...
    by stillidealistic
  • BABIES, RACCOONS AND HEALTH CARE
    by dickday
  • Two Dreamers, by Dorothea Lange
    by Rutabaga Ridgepole
  • Tsunami Wave: Will Wipe Out Republican Party
    by coonsey
  • OBVIOUSLY, YOU AREN'T A HUNTER.....
    by wvbiker
  • The Stupack Amendment played politics with women's lives and won.
    by J. Clarence
  • holly colorado
    by blumun
  • short stories
    by lumacer
  • letter examples
    by bulomar
  • wooden projects
    by kubaser



  • Resources

    The Palin Effect

    GOP Map Of Sleaze

    Tire Swinging

    The Final Debate

    World of Sleaze

    All About Sarah

    The Presidential Debates: Round 2

    The Vice-Presidential Debates: Biden v. Palin

    Critic or Cheerleader The Definitive McCain Iraq Timeline

    The John McCain John Hagee Timeline

    Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Reporter-Bloggers
    Elana Schor
    Eric Kleefeld



    Subscribe to this blog's feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address