Exclusive: Former Intel Chair Roberts Backs Panetta
Just interviewed Pat Roberts (R-KS), former Senate intelligence chairman, about the contention surrounding Leon Panetta's nomination to head the CIA. Roberts was castigated by the liberal establishment for his performance investigating the intelligence errors surrounding the war in Iraq, but his four years helming the committee gave him a front-row seat for previous confirmation fights. And he had an interesting message: He plans to support Panetta.
"On the one hand, I think it's good to take a fresh look with a new director" at CIA, Roberts told me. "On the other hand, it's not on-the-job training [at the agency]. But Leon is a fast study."
Asked about the Obama transition's failure to inform incoming intelligence chairman Dianne Feinstein and outgoing chairman Jay Rockefeller about the Panetta nod, Roberts replied: "I don't think it's intentional -- California politics aside." (A possible reference to Panetta and Feinstein's shared history in their home state.)
Still, Roberts acknowledged that the situation Feinstein faces -- a junior member of the intel committee being told of a pending nomination before the chairman -- never occurred during his time at the helm.
Roberts and Panetta are old friends from their days on the House administration committee, and the bond of shared congressional service runs deep -- which could help win Panetta several Republican votes. But on the deeper issues of operational knowledge of the CIA and antipathy to Bush-era interrogation tactics, Panetta also gets Roberts' nod.
"I know this job entails protection of civil liberties as well as protecting America," Roberts told me, seeming to acknowledge Panetta's staunch criticism of the Bush intelligence record. "Leon's the kind of guy who's very pragmatic. He'll do what's best for the country."
When he became chairman, Roberts said, his first order of business was visiting each of the 16 agencies that comprise the US intelligence world. "My advice to him would be ... to pay a courtesy call," Roberts said of Panetta.















Great outflanking of DiFi and Rockefeller, not a real friend of civil liberties between them, not with a spine anyway. How could either of them not support Panetta when the committee's minority leader does! Ha!
Now I look forward with relish the Obamacans' well-deserved and long-overdue chastening of the ass-backward, Confederate-leanin', progress-retarding Blue Dogs.
January 6, 2009 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have my bones to pick with Obama from time to time and will continue to, but I'll take him any day of the week, and twice on Sunday, over our useless "Democratic" congressional "leaders".
January 6, 2009 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
This may seem a little Off Topic, but one thing Leon Panetta did while the Democrats were out of office was to chair the US Catholic Bishop's Commission on Protection of Children -- in effect, the Commission designed to repair things after the Pedophile Scandals broke hard over the heads of the Bishops. If anything is more understood through a lens darkly than the CIA, it would be the Internal Politics of the Catholic Church.
Panetta was appointed chair of this commission only after the former Governor of Oklahoma, Frank Keating, had crashed and burned on the job. Keating had gone public with criticism of several powerful bishops and Cardinals who were slow rolling the necessary investigation, and got fired, and Panetta was brought in to 1) do the job, and 2) do it without confrontation with the powerful and the Vatican. And he was successful. It took him about 18 months, but he gradually built up trust in the commission, outsourced a full audit of every US Diocese's record dealing with reports of Priestly Pedophilia to the John Jay College of Law in NYC, did a public report that dug back to about 1945, and proposed a full range of reforms -- not reforms that were necessarily "required" but reforms that would be voluntary yet auditable.
The effect of this was that while done with proper decorum and respect, the American Catholic Bishops detailed many (not all mind you) of their errors and sins, recommended reforms, and above all built the pressure to settle up with the victims of Priestly Abuse -- pay up and say you are very very sorry. It probably cost the American Catholic Bishops about two and a half billion dollars to pay off and reform -- but Panetta did turn them around from standing in the church door and saying never -- to facing reality and understanding the necessity of change.
I put this on the table not because Bishops or Pedophilia are relevant to being CIA Director, but because it is an example of Leon Panetta's skills in very hot situations to lead in solving problems. In effect what he accomplished was to get church leaders to put all the rot on the table out in public, and then face the need for change. I think this may be what we actually want in a new CIA Director.
January 6, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for introducing this background, Sara. I remember seeing a thing or two about it but didn't follow it that closely. I don't think it's off-topic at all, I think it is a very strong qualification for the job, not the least of which both are byzantine, secretive, old boy networks by their very design. (You can make them more open, but if you go overboard in the other direction, you can also ruin the whole purpose--very delicate work required.)
January 6, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
What the heck is wrong with Feinstein and Rockefeller.....Roberts is on board, but they aren't?
Are they competing to be the least relevant Democratic Senator, or what?
January 6, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
If so, let's hope they both get their wish.
January 6, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feinstein lost my 2012 vote when she voted to confirm Mukasey. Sorry I can't do anything about Rocky, though.
January 6, 2009 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/Bob Graham backs Panetta pick
January 6, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
This gets even better. Obama picks Panetta, knowing Pat Roberts will bring their old card-playing circle with him for personal reasons, and leaves Fainstein and Rockefeller absolutely high and dry.
January 6, 2009 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink