« Election Central Morning Roundup | Home | Death By 1,000 Cuts: The GOP Takes On Obama's Nominees »

Daschle's Delay: The Backstory Behind EduCap

Following on its scoop on Tim Geithner's taxes, the Journal reports today on a new vetting problem with Health & Human Services nominee Tom Daschle, a former Senate Democratic leader. It seems that Daschle accepted corporate jet flights from a non-profit student-loan company called EduCap, which is already the subject of inquiries into its tax status.

Okay ... the next question might be, so what? If every prominent Washington figure was hassled for using the private planes of companies under scrutiny, the government would stop running altogether. (Sometimes it feels like that already happened.) So why is EduCap a potential headache for Daschle?

The answer is Catherine Reynolds, the CEO of EduCap and a Washington society doyenne whose private foundation has doled out more than $100 million to cultural causes since 2001. The Washington Post reported in 2007 (story linked to above) that EduCap was in the hot seat with the IRS for, among other things, paying for Reynolds and her friends to take in lobster and private concerts in the Caribbean.

The Journal notes that Daschle traveled "to vacation spots" on EduCap's $30 million corporate jet, though it isn't clear whether those trips were the same ones that attracted IRS attention. Most importantly, it also isn't clear when Daschle took the trips, whether during his senatorial term (which ended in 2004) or after he left public life.

At issue is EduCap's tax status -- namely, whether the company could rightfully claim a tax exemption given Reynolds' lavish use of company funds. Of course, when Reynolds was quoted in the Post inviting any skeptics to "take it up with Congress," it was basically a given that Congress would take her up on the offer.

And it was Chuck Grassley (IA), the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, who started looking into EduCap's tax status. Grassley's committee is the one now holding up Daschle's confirmation hearing as it looks into his EduCap ties.

But what was Daschle doing palling around on EduCap's jet while the company was in some trouble? Put simply, it seems that the Daschles and Reynoldses are sort of BFFs. As a sore Buffy Cafritz explained to Vanity Fair (hopefully the last time a "Buffy" will be attributed here):

Catherine Reynolds has left behind a trail of broken friendships. ... The [Tom] Daschles [former Democratic Senate majority leader from South Dakota and his wife, Linda] are now her best friends. I can go through seven people she's dumped. Nobody understands her. She goes to the ladies' room and her husband stands outside. Why not? She's the bank.

The Finance Committee's interest in Daschle, then, looks in large part to be a way of rustling up more information on Reynolds and EduCap. Barack Obama's health secretary nominee will just have to hang in there for a while -- not unlike Tim Geithner -- while the political machine known as "the vetting process" works its will. Both men are still nearly sure things for approval in the Senate.

Meanwhile, however, the media machine's tendency to inflate and overplay these episodes could have lasting consequences for Obama. More on that soon.


16 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Why is so much power being ceded to the Republicans? I don't recall the Democrats being allowed to do much holding up of the confirmations of Chimpy's appointees.

user-pic

It sounds like this information was leaked to the Republican aides from the IRS or someone in the federal government. There are many competing interests who do not want to see universal health care reform take place with the public insurance option as a competitive player against the private insurance companies.

user-pic

Great. Another John Solomon-style "scandal." I'd be surprised if there isn't a nominee for something somewhere who made profit by selling his or her house during the housing bubble and I'm sure that will set off alarm bells all over the Village.

Why does the vetting process for a Democratic president's appointees always look so different from a Republican's?

user-pic

On the lighter side of things, it turns out one of Bu$h's original campaign pledges was actually accomplished. Remember back in 2000 when he said he was a uniter not a divider. Well, it's a noted fact that he united a vast majority from both sides of the political spectrum in thinking he really screwed the pooch during his 8 years in office

He can look forward to it being an integral part of his legacy he's so worried about.

user-pic
Why is so much power being ceded to the Republicans? I don't recall the Democrats being allowed to do much holding up of the confirmations of Chimpy's appointees.
Why does the vetting process for a Democratic president's appointees always look so different from a Republican's?

Because for Republicans and the media, IOKIYAR.

Anything goes for Republicans. Democrats must eternally be held to a higher standard.

I'm concerned about how the media narrative will influence the effectiveness of the Obama Administration. I guess I can take comfort in the fact that the honeymoon hasn't been declared over before he even takes office.

I also suspect that Republicans are trying to get their licks in now, because I expect that Tuesday is going to give Obama a big huge helping of incredible goodwill from the American public.

user-pic

I understand the media. I do NOT understand the enabling of this crap by the Senate Democrats.

user-pic

Yeah, well, to borrow from Rummy, you don't have the Democrats you'd like to have. You have the Democrats you have.

They're insufferable. Bigger majorities right now, and it seems as if Senate Dems are willing to fight only their PE.

user-pic

Don't mistake a lot of Republican bloviating for actual effectiveness. They're just trying to remain relevant, but the best they can do is delay the hearing for a few days. Every one of Obama's nominees is going to sail through.

user-pic

I think every one of the nominees is going to get through as well, but that's not my concern at this point.

My concern is the media, and the possibility for the "bumpy start" meme that Villager Fineman wrote about to become "conventional wisdom".

I guess I'm not terribly worried, though, for two reasons: next Tuesday, and, Obama. He's certainly a different type of politician.

user-pic

I think people are so glad to be rid of Bush&Co that no one much cares if there are a few bumps. I also think most people are smart enough to know that the bumps in the road are being put there deliberately. The R's have a long history of being obstructionist, going back to the Clinton administration, and people remember that.

user-pic

I suspect the benevolence the Democrats are giving to the repugs at the moment will be used later on to thwart any attempt to paint the majority by the minority as gestapo-like stormtroopers determined to exclude minority opinions and objections from meaningful legislation. No, they've been fair and just, and allowed the opposition to state their opinions on all matters before the Chamber. Just because their input was ignored doesn't mean it wasn't considered.

user-pic

If I read this story correctly, EduCap isn't even being accused of any crime - they're just in danger of losing their tax status. So the issue is a weak association with someone who hasn't even committed a crime? I wonder how many Senators could meet that standard?

user-pic

or better yet, how many Senators questioning the ethics of Mr. Daschle are guilty of the same lack of ethics as well? How else would they know to look for such an obscure, questionable association that could be misinterpreted by those unaware of the political dynamics of the situation?

user-pic

If it takes Elana that many words to describe Daschle's problem, I think it is safe to say

So what?

user-pic

Daschle is an insider and they're almost always subject to closer degree of "scrutiny." Is it fair? Of course not. But, this is how DC works -- and Obama is in the minor leagues still. I mean, things will be a lot rougher in the near future.

So, my view is to have Daschle begin working. He's got plenty of dough, I am sure, so asking him to start working on health care policy is hardly asking for a sacrifice. He'll be confirmed - this is just simple DC games.

user-pic
Daschle is an insider and they're almost always subject to closer degree of "scrutiny."
Actually, that's the exact reverse of the truth. Ex-Senators nearly always sail through more easily than any other class of nominee. At least when they're Republican ex-Senators being vetted by Democrats. Because- all together now- IOKIYAR.

What's really going on here is that the Republican party is TERRIFIED of real health care reform and will throw every kind of roadblock in front of it that they can think of. Some of their strategists have admitted publicly that if the Dems can pull that off, they'll be in the majority for a long time.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address