Republicans Popping Up To Defend Saltsman For "Magic Negro" CD
It's now becoming clear that there is a good-sized contingent of Republicans who are openly defending Chip Saltsman, the former Tennessee GOP chairman and candidate for RNC chair who sent out a CD to committee members that includes a parody song called "Barack The Magic Negro."
• Mike Huckabee, for whom Saltsman served as campaign manager, has chimed in to defend Saltsman against the charge of racism, while at the same time acknowledging that "Chip should have been more careful" in picking the CD. "It shouldn't be the main factor in the RNC race," Huckabee wrote on his blog.
• Another person defending Saltsman has been Mark Ellis, the GOP state chairman in Maine -- not the sort of place you would automatically expect someone to stick up for this: "When I found out what this was about I had to ask, 'Boy, what's the big deal here?' because there wasn't any."
• "I don't think he intended it as any kind of racial slur. I think he intended it as a humor gift," said Oklahoma committeewoman Carolyn McClarty. "I think it was innocently done by Chip."
• Said Alabama committeeman Paul Reynolds: "Chip probably could have thought it through a bit more, but he was doing everyone a favor by giving us a gift. This is just people looking for something to make an issue of."
Saltsman does have another prominent defender: Paul Shanklin, the man who actually wrote the song for Rush Limbaugh's show. "They are trying to paint Chip as some kind of racist -- which he's not," Shanklin told McClatchy. "Whether he should have sent it out, I'll let history decide. Is it provocative? Well, most political satire is. What I do for a living is major-league provocative."
To be fair, there are quite a few other Republicans who have been loudly condemning this as exactly the wrong thing to do for a party that needs to reach out again to swing voters. But this is hardly a good start for the GOP, if there exist a decent number of Republicans who will say that a leadership candidate is getting a raw deal in a case like this.















Every Republican should be called on to defend this clown. Let them all go down together with this racist!
December 30, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. It is like they will never change. Well good for them. And good for us.
December 30, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Republicans. What will we do with you?
The fact that you don't get what the problem is, is the problem.
December 30, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I take it that the GOP wants to continue to be the minority party.
December 30, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
They are the party of the uber-wealthy. So technically, they arenot just the minority party, they are the uber-minority party.
December 30, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
These defenses sound exactly like the Don Imus defense.
December 30, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
My thinking exactly. The best part of this is, you really can't make this stuff up. These fools want to self-destruct.
December 30, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
deeper than that:
They are the party of the corporate plutocracy which is composed by definition wealthy white persons who are psychologically made up of anti-democratic personalities and adhor any genuine manifestation of equality or opportunity.
Thus to make "fun" of Obama who cleaned their clocks is their psychological joy and what in part binds them.
December 31, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe there is a difference between being a racist and racially insensitive. I would not go so far as calling this man a racist, but as head of the RNC he needs to be a lore more racially sensitive.
I don't understand why things can't be racially insensitive without being racist.
Racism isn't giving an African American a job because his black. Racial insensitivity is make a joke in bad taste.
December 30, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not all racists wear white sheets and burn crosses. Some smile nicely while they mend your broken leg and then prescribe pain killers if you're white and don't if you're black. Some graciously demur your rental request and regretfully they have already rented the apartment. Some send out humor CD's with "provocative" lyrics and wonder where your sense of humor went.
I am so sick and tired of people excusing racist behavior and saying this or that person is not a racist. If you continue to define racism as only the behavior at the extreme violent end of the racist spectrum, you cannot ever successfuly work to defeat it. You cannot defeat what you will not name.
December 30, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm of two minds. I do agree that we should fight this kind of thing wherever it crops up.
At the same time, it kind of reminds me how my son and his friends went through a period in their early and mid-teens when they couldn't seem to resist calling one another "faggot" or using "gay" as a general term of derogation. Being gay myself, I called them on this repeatedly, and they would apologize, then they'd go right back to their old habits.
Here we had a pretty clear example of insensitivity as opposed to genuine prejudice. All these guys have since improved their manners, and have demonstrated in many ways that they consider actual homophobia to be, in a word, ridiculous. This doesn't excuse the "faggot" talk, which is undoubtedly hurtful to their young gay peers. But it's not the same as active hatred of queers.
December 31, 2008 8:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I am so sick and tired of people excusing racist behavior and saying this or that person is not a racist. If you continue to define racism as only the behavior at the extreme violent end of the racist spectrum, you cannot ever successfuly work to defeat it. You cannot defeat what you will not name."
I should have figured Saltsman was from TN. What a disgrace to the human race. I am a born and raised New Englander, who transplanted to Nashville 15 years ago. Nothing these stupid red staters surprises me anymore. I am surrounded by them! It was such a joy to work at Obama's campaign headquarters because I actually met some people who weren't blindly following the repubs, and could think for themselves. These people still believe in Bush!
Remember how they made a big thing about Obama's remark about being bitter and clinging to religion and guns? Well I am bitter. But, I do not cling to religion and guns. The churches here are so massive, they are bigger than some civic centers I have seen. They are the blind leading the blind. All the churches want is your money, obedience, and to merit out punishment. In some small way, it will be good for Dems because of that racist hateful song. Maybe some repubs will do a little soul searching and realize that they are not so racist after all.
We can always hope.
December 31, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe there is a difference between being a racist and racially insensitive. I would not go so far as calling this man a racist, but as head of the RNC he needs to be a lore more racially sensitive.
I don't understand why things can't be racially insensitive without being racist.
Racism isn't giving an African American a job because his black. Racial insensitivity is make a joke in bad taste.
December 30, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I think the two go hand in hand. Do you honestly believe that this guy gives racial minorities a fair shake in employment issues? Do you believe this is an isolated incident or more likely part of a pattern?
I would also argue that this goes beyond "insensitivity." I'd say that this is racially provocative, which is another step closer to the actual racism you want to define as some stand-alone thing apart from other elements of racial prejudice.
I personally don't think you have to have a white hood on to be racist. I believe that we all carry elements of racism around with us, that it is not something any honest person can deny having within them, no matter how some of us struggle against it daily.
December 30, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe there is a difference between being a racist and racially insensitive. I would not go so far as calling this man a racist, but as head of the RNC he needs to be a lore more racially sensitive.
I don't understand why things can't be racially insensitive without being racist.
Racism isn't giving an African American a job because his black. Racial insensitivity is make a joke in bad taste.
December 30, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
You may be splitting hairs.
Anyway, the point is that someone running to be chairman of the RNC a month after getting creamed in the minority vote, probably shouldn't be distributing "jokes" about race, period.
The problem with this song is that it's about race. Why isn't it about "Barack the Magic Chicagoan"? Or the "Magic Skinny Guy"? Or the "Magic Democrat"? Because when they look at Obama, they overwhelmingly think "black guy."
They don't even get that their doing it. When they say "What? What's the problem?" I think they're being sincere.
December 30, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I think we should make a distinction. Legal Racism actually hurts me an African American.
Racial insensitivity while annoying doesn't bother me in a very real way.
You are correct that the chairman of the RNC shouldn't be racially insensitive especially when he wants to lead a "national" political party.
However being racially insensitive isn't the same as being a racist.
December 30, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I think we should make a distinction. Legal Racism actually hurts me an African American.
Racial insensitivity while annoying doesn't bother me in a very real way.
You are correct that the chairman of the RNC shouldn't be racially insensitive especially when he wants to lead a "national" political party.
However being racially insensitive isn't the same as being a racist.
December 30, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except that racial insensitivity is a symptom of legal racism. It doesn't bother you that a guy who clearly has no respect for minorities has a say in the laws that effect minorities? If he weren't running for a position of authority I could see your point - a racially insensitive janitor is one thing, but this guy wants to be involved in the political process, and I take huge issue with that.
December 30, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah but because I'm not a member of the Republican party I can't vote against the insensitivity of this guy. The only thing I can do is vote against Republicans which I already do for so many other reasons.
December 30, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah but because I'm not a member of the Republican party I can't vote against the insensitivity of this guy. The only thing I can do is vote against Republicans which I already do for so many other reasons.
December 30, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't it amazing that a professional politician would be so tone-deaf?
IMHO, I think the song in question is actually racist. Rush Limbaugh read the words of a measured, interesting (but iirc flawed) L.A. Times column and decided that they gave him license to start mocking Obama as some sort of minstrel, the "magic negro". If the article hadn't come out, Limbaugh would never have played the song. The article gave him cover to start spewing away.
December 30, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love the smell of the Republican Party spontaneously combusting in the morning.
December 30, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL! Perfect.
December 30, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
...it's the smell of victory.
December 30, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
goood good gooooooood
December 30, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love that the same people who want to hold Al Franken's comedy writings against him when it comes to his political ambitions also think that it's fine for politicians to distribute Rush Limbaugh's "comedy" routines and that they don't have to consider the implications. Idiots!
December 30, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
How long before one of them says "But I played it for my black friend and he laughed!"
December 30, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Signed, Rick Warren.
December 30, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL! How white is Saddleback, anyway?
December 30, 2008 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Saddleback is SO WHITE that when Obama went there for Rick Warren's forum, 374 church members in the audience tried to hand him their coats.
(I know someone can do better than this...) :-)
December 30, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
BBpdx said "The fact that you don't get what the problem is, is the problem" and I think that nails it.
If you've listened to the song, the subject sings that Obama is not an ig'rant, shiffless, no-count gang-banger "like me," and that's why all them white folks is so impressed with him. Republicans don't get that that's not funny, that it's stereo-typing every black person's accomplishments or hopes of accomplishment as the pipedreams of uppity (insert 'N' word here.)
I want someone to call J.C. Watts. Let's hear his take on this cracker's idea of humor. I'll bet you can't print it without a whole lot of
December 30, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Joe Biden would say, God love em. These people are so entrenched in their own echo chambers, they can't tell morning fron night. Here, you lose the african american vote by 90%, the hispanic vote by 2-1, the asian vote, the native american vote- every ethnic group-YOU LOST- and yet you have a cd with Barack the Magic Negro and the Star Spanglish Banner- hell even Leslie Sanchez on CNN called it stupid. Since CNN has the most diverse GOP strategists I wonder how Amy Holmes (black) feels or Alex Castellanos (hispanic) feels or even Mel Martinez. It had to be hard for him to be part of a party that scapegoats his own people. The republicans will become the party of 163 (electoral votes). Sooner or later Texas will go, as well as Arizona. What will become of the party of Lincoln. I hope Saltsman gets in, because you must have some chuzpah, grande BALLS to degrade someone as a MAGIC NEGRO, after an election where the MAGIC NEGRO beat the White War Hero and the White all around hockey mom. I remember something Barack said, they MUST think you're stupid. Even after getting their asses served to them on platter with crackers and dip, the republicans still do think you're stupid.
December 30, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the Republicans are the Crackers and Dips
December 30, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
God love 'em is right. Erick the Redstate had a post yesterday explaining the wingnut reasoning behind why Saltsman is OK and his detractors in the GOP are so misguided. I believe reason number one was that the song was originally played on Rush's show, and if you don't agree with Rush or at least listen to his show regularly, then you're not in touch with the base. In other words, Rush says its OK for the base of the party to be racially insensitive - get with the program, or get out of the way.
Let's ponder this for a minute. For a goodly number of GOP party activists, Rush is the ultimate leader of the party. This community college dropout radio host whose cockamamie ideas have lead the party to catastrophic electoral defeat. Nevermind Rush's obvious racism, the drug abuse, the multiple failed marriages. He's a repellent public personality and a political liability, yet they treat him like some kind of god. Very weird.
December 30, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have never been able to fathom that. The idea that people take him seriously was one of the early intimations of civilization's decline.
December 30, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
The amazing thing to me is that Salzman is trying to get a political job in an atmosphere in which his party has been soundly defeated by minorities of all stripes. Really, does the RNC want their chair to be so colossally bad at politics that he couldn't foresee that blithely passing around 'Barack the Magic Negro' might not go over all that well with the very communities that the new chair is hoping to poach from the Democrats?
And the comments from other Republicans are classic too. Here's a tip, guys - it's not about the media. It's about the voters who already think you're racist xenophobes, but that you have to find a way to attract in the 2010 elections.
I dearly hope this guy wins!
December 30, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The woman who was behind that Obama-watermelon-KFC mailing in California during the campaign must be thinking: If only I'd been running for RNC chairman...
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_buck16.3d67d4a.html
December 30, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Eherenstein piece, on which the song parody hangs its hat, is about the fictional device known as the "magical negro," a character meant to help white characters in a story without being threatening. The song parody has nothing to do with that, but instead depicts Al Sharpton and other black leaders as angry at what they see as a lack of "street cred" with Obama.
These are two very different things, and must be made clear.
For those interested, Mark Ellis wrote more about this on his blog here.
December 30, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suueh, et all no diffence den dey fav o rite show de Amus en Andy. Ain no ham dun.
December 30, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The other candidate for the RNC chair, South Carolina Republican Chairman Katon Dawson belonged to a "WHITE'S ONLY" country club... FOR ELEVEN YEARS!
ELEVEN YEARS in a WHITES ONLY KKKountry KKKlub.
He quit a couple of weeks before running.
Nasty little bigots, all of them.
December 30, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gawd, I despise Huckabee more and more with every position he takes- he's even worse when he tries to explain them.
December 30, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Today's Republican Party:
Racism R Us
December 30, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Spud1, I call BS... the guy from the L.A. paper never said "He made guilty whites feel good they'll vote for him and not for me
cause he's not from da hood."
Btw, the other guy running for the GOP chair, SCGOP Chairman Katon Dawson belonged to a "WHITE'S ONLY" KKKountry KKKlub... FOR ELEVEN YEARS!
December 30, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
obama isnt offended by this.
why should anyone else be??
personally i would have been but since obama praises warren types, i am taking my lead from him and accepting that i just have a difference of opinion with racists and anti-semites skin-heads, etc etc.
if its good enough for obama its good enough for me.
December 30, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is a politician. Do you honestly believe that every last thing he ever says is what he truly feels? Are all of Obama's actions completely divorced from political expediency?
While he is an obvious role model in numerous ways, and I am enormously proud to have voted for him, I still prefer to retain my own brain and still make decisions for myself, no offense.
December 30, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
or maybe you were merely being sarcastic
December 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
First the Fox News "Daily Show" rip-off and now this. Have you noticed that Republicans just aren't funny? In fact, they're downright mean. Kind of makes me wonder how they expect to get "raptured." Would be different if they were humble, but they don't get that, either.
December 30, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again if a song like this was produced about Bush and handed out by a DNC chair candidate the republicans would be calling for someones head. Their hypocrisy never ceases to shock me. If any other DJ played this song they would be fired
December 30, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The reason most Republicans don't see the CD as wrong is because they don't know many African Americans. First of all "Negro" is SO 1950's. In their social sphere there may be a few blacks, but as it has been pointed out, one candidate for the RNC chairmanship recently resigned from a Whites Only country club -- he didn't see that as wrong until he ran for a national office?
As for the DNC putting out something denigrating Bush -- they haven't done that. There's nothing wrong with parodying someone's actions. If they wanted to do a skit lampooning Obama's oratory, or his thin resume, that's fair game -- it's about what he does, not what he is.
I saw the video and I read the Ehrenstein essay -- it was a nuanced and thoughtful examination of how blacks cope with racial issues to move up the ladder in American society. I doubt that Shaklin who made the parody or Saltsman really understood what Ehrenstein was saying because -- again, they don't know any blacks.
Since one of the other parodies is "The Star Spanglish Banner" we can guess they don't know any Hispanics either.
Anyhow, let them have their fun. I'd like to see how much the laugh when they get creamed in the 2010 election. I'm saving up my money now to donate to any Democrat that looks likely to take down a Repubican.
December 30, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a sign of what the Republican Party is. It's not a case of a rabid conservative going off the moderation reservation, but one of a mainstream Republican just putting normal Republican thought out to the public. There are no reasonable adults in the modern Republican Party. What we see as extremists, are middle of the road for them.
December 30, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
During the election the Tennessee GOP was by far the worst state in terms of blatantly race baiting against Obama and even Michelle Obama. PATHETIC
December 30, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one that is pulling for Chip to win? They can collectively go down in flames with him as their head.
December 30, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm searching right now for a place where I can throw $10 or $20 to help Saltsman's candidacy.
December 30, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Careful what you wish for guys. Sure, it's fun to watch the Wingnuts burst into flames...but what happens if they actually do completely self-destruct? What then?
Single-party politics are no fun. Just ask anybody dealing in the local politics of a major city, where Democrats are the only game in town. Or look at the other few times it's happened at the national level, most recently with the Democratic-Republican party pre-Jackson. It's way harder to put coalitions together and to actually effect legislation. Nothing gets done and everything is chaos. And after about a decade or two the single party splits (usually right down the middle of economic issues) and we're back to where we were.
For my part, I'd much rather see a weakened, but viable, Republican party stick around to be the opposition that every reasonable person thinks is absolutely nuts. I'm starting to be a bit concerned that Saltsman and Palin could actually destroy that possibility.
December 31, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, the problem here isn't that the guy made a racist joke. It's ok to make a racist joke, but before you do it, you should make sure you are at least cool with the people you're making fun of. Racial insensitivity and being totally completely un-politically-correct is fine as long as the people understand its a joke.
Republicans aren't cool with black people, so its not ok for them to make this sort of joke.
If John Stewart made a joke about how Obama might get a pitt bull and a rottweiler and chain them up in the white house lawn as dogs for his girls, people would have laughed at it. It's racially insensitive, but people know John Stewart isn't a racist. People wouldn't wonder in the back of their mind if he really ment it, they would see it on face for what it was, something silly.
On the other hand, the RNC is filled with old rich racist country club white guys that don't even understand that black people really don't care for them... The problem here isn't even really the joke, its the people making the joke.
Hell if it was at least funny people might not have cared as much. Its not funny, its like the Don Imus thing, its just offensive.
December 30, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can picture a satire of Saltsman in a white sheet, playing his flute as the elephants line up behind him and jump over the cliff one by one.
December 30, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like lemmings, jostling to pitch themselves over a cliff, into the sea. I love Nature.
December 30, 2008 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone posted an MP3?
I don't like getting outraged just on principle. I don't need to hear one of my conservative buddies asking "Well, have you heard it?"
No, I haven't.
Can you help?
December 30, 2008 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have you tried searching youtube? It's out there...
December 31, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's just great. I think the RNC should put in as high a position as possible someone who makes racist slurs about an incoming black president with an 80% approval rating. They're just proving what they are, and they will cement their status as a regional party. Gotta love em.
December 30, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
An interesting fact is there isn't much coming out of the black community on this issue. So I would have to say Saltsman isn't coming across as a racist to them; however, I will say I find him, as well as those who support him on this issue, to be crass . And that's not a desirable quality one should expect to see in members of the Senate. Perhaps the Senate needs to look into the matter and deal with this based on their own Parliamentary rules of order.
December 30, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a beleaguered Democrat from Tennessee and I know some hilarious parodies too!
Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
He knew that Republicans were unhappy,
after Obama it was tough.
So he sent out a CD insulting his race
and other redneck stuff.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
Chip said the songs were satire,
just humorous and all in fun.
When Democrats saw the mess he’d made
they said his campaign was done.
But Chip knew other crackers
would revel in the slime.
The only thing better than being hit by Dems
would be an attack from the New York Times.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
So Chip’s blunder actually helped him
and got him votes, or so they say.
And maybe next we’ll see him running
for president of the USA.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
December 30, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a beleaguered Democrat from Tennessee and I know some hilarious parodies too!
Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
He knew that Republicans were unhappy,
after Obama it was tough.
So he sent out a CD insulting his race
and other redneck stuff.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
Chip said the songs were satire,
just humorous and all in fun.
When Democrats saw the mess he’d made
they said his campaign was done.
But Chip knew other crackers
would revel in the slime.
The only thing better than being hit by Dems
would be an attack from the New York Times.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
So Chip’s blunder actually helped him
and got him votes, or so they say.
And maybe next we’ll see him running
for president of the USA.
Oh, Chip the Ignorant Cracker
came from Tennessee.
He was running for Grand Dragon
of the good ole RNC.
December 30, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans have smoothly morphed into a crackpot 3rd party. Palin was a canonical 3rd party candidate; McCain became one.
Krugman accurately predicted that the R's would become more not less cranky in response to their defeat. Sit back & watch it play out according to script.
December 30, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
i will NEVER forget how the repugs have used race as a wedge issue for a long time,what they need to do is figure out if they can find even one shred of humanity
December 30, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, umm, has anyone actually read the full lyric to the song? It has more than just the one line, you know.
The guy it's really slamming isn't Obama, it's Sharpton. The "magic Negro" line is from his point of view: he (or the version of him portrayed in the song) is saying that Obama is too white, too disconnected from mainstream black culture, to be authentically black, and that white people "vote for him and not for me" for that reason. In other words, the whole point of the parody is that "magic Negro" *is* an insult; it's being used to make the point that there's a lot of in-fighting between mainstream black leaders (remember "cut his nuts off"?) and Obama. Which is a perfectly valid point.
I understand that for anyone white to utter the word "Negro" is offensive regardless of the context. Heck, it's probably offensive for me to have uttered it in that last sentence, even in quotation marks. It's probably offensive for everyone here to utter it in the context of discussing the song parody we're all talking about. But if you think the context makes any difference at all, it might be worth looking at it. If you do, you'll see that the line doesn't really come off as a racist slur against Obama, and it's hardly even a racist slur against Sharpton given that that's actually the sort of thing he'd say.
I hate to think that the left can be just as capable of faux outrage as the right (remember "lipstick on a pig"?), but every once in a while I'm kind of forced to.
December 30, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
You have a point, but if you are vulnerable to the faux outrage you really need to be careful in what you say. Or deal with the consequences.
December 30, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The "context" that should be addressed here is the current political environment.
To review:
- The guy who put the song out for distribution among top GOPers is Chip Saltsman.
- Saltsman hails from Tennessee and is a former Tennessee GOP chairman. (Think Fred Hobbs and Robin Smith. Can you say "stigma"? I knew you could.)
- Saltsman is running for RNC chair.
- The Republicans essentially got their collective asses handed to them on a platter - and the serving was done mostly by minority groups of all kinds.
- The GOP is so desperate to reconnect with minority groups on some level that there are TWO *Black* Republicans running for the same seat Saltsman wants.
- Never mind the lyrics - the very TITLE of the song carries sufficiently nasty implications. Not to mention, those implications are aimed directly at the man who will soon be the nation's first President of color (and no, JFK's Hyannis tan doesn't qualify).
- The song also carries a slur against Hispanics, who will soon be the largest minority group in the United States. Hispanics just thoroughly rejected a GOP Presidential candidate who has actually been very friendly on immigration issues, particularly with Mexico.
Given THAT context, I really don't care if the remainder of the song is a hosannah to Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Benjamin Banneker, Nat Turner and Richard Pryor combined.
Saltsman is politically tone-deaf to have even considered sending out that song in this climate. Any defense of him that does not factor in the current pathetic state of the party - especially with regard to its lack of minority relations - is as inept and feckless as Saltsman's original actions.
Therefore, I wholeheartedly endorse his candidacy for chairmanship of the Republican National Committee.
December 30, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
One correction:
should read
December 30, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I've read the lyrics and listened to the song. And I think you're missing the point.
I agree with you that the song doesn't insult Obama. What you're missing is that in contrasting Obama to "authentic" African Americans (er..."Negroes"...really!?) the song stereotypes and insults every black person in America who isn't Barack Obama. It equates "blackness" with being a member of a poor, immoral and dangerous underclass. By calling Obama the nonthreatening, upstanding, decent "fake" black guy, it paints "real" black guys as the opposite of those things. And frankly, that's not OK. It's not just racially insensitive...it's racist. It wasn't OK when it was just on Rush Limbaugh's whack-job of a radio show, and now that a real national-level political operative is pimping it it's just way, way out there.
Of course, it's certainly fun to watch everyone in Chip's party come out of the woodwork to defend him. I suppose once you purge all the reasonable people from your party your decision making becomes rather less than reasonable. Duncan sounded way too sane during this affair...time to go.
December 31, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good points from all commenters here!
I'd only quibble with "faux outrage" as a characterization of the response to this from the left. My sense is that most people on our side of the aisle are just shaking their heads and muttering, "Can't you believe he actually DID that?"
Some of us, of course, are muttering more loudly than others.
December 31, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please don't say Cracker, they prefer to be called Biscuit Americans.
The fact that so many Republicans don't understand how offensive this is shows you how out of touch the party is.
December 30, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biscuit Americans! That's too good. It made the five minutes it took to write the parody worthwhile just for that snark.
December 30, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I watched that woman defend the parody on MSNBC, and I've seen lots of comments in various places about how this isn't about Obama, that it's about Sharpton, that it's about the LA times, that it's about liberals, that we should all listen to the whole song to truly get how innocent Chip is in all this, blah blah blah.
In this respect, I think Mark Twain's comment is particularly apt:
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it better, but the frog dies in the process."
December 30, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Makes me think of Lee Atwater.
December 31, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
As Maddow said, stay classic, GOP. Stay classic. Don't change. You guys can take Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana Tennessee, Kentucky and Oklahoma (and maybe Texas, though we'll work on that). We'll take the rest - and we won't even have to talk about killing the filibuster in the Senate.
December 31, 2008 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a bunch of fucking idiots they are. Very clannish (Klannish) behavior.
December 31, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two men apply for a position in a fortune 500 company. One has ten years of experience, several certifications, and a masters degree in the field. The other has four less years of experience, fewer certifications, and his masters. The second candidate got the job. Why?
The answer is pure and simple: Racism. People associate these "-isms" with all directly negative terms, however when the less qualified candidate gets a position because of a "minority quota", that is most certainly and clearly racism.
-------------------
If I called you an idiot or sang a song that questioned your intelligence, I wouldn't automatically be a "handicapped-ist", I'd just be an insensitive jerk because you're legitimately special.
To quote Obama: “We know what kind of campaign they’re going to run,” said the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. “They’re going to try to make you afraid. They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. ‘He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?’"
Noone candidate said anything about his race or heritage. If he was born here in America, he's an American with African heritage. If he was born in Africa and moved here to America, he's an African-American... Just because you're of African (Asian, Italian, Russian, Indian, etc) does not make you a -American. Respect (and if you can't, make respectable) the country that made your life and decisions possible.
With racial pride comes equal opportunity for racial prejudice. Be proud to be an American and make not enemies of your fellow Americans.
December 31, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is not that the Republican Party as an organization or Republicans as individuals are racist; indeed that is not the case. Rather the Republican Party as an institutional organization and its officials, candidates and office holders at the state national and local levels, have been willing to at the very least least, turn a blind eye to racism and allowed their operatives to quietly used a less than equal view of race as a strategic tool in campaigns for the past forty years.
From Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy, which trumpeted “law and order” at a time of civil unrest and violence in African American communities it is a hop skip and jump to George Bush-the-Elder’s infamous Willie Horton attack ad and a legislative history of opposition to nearly every proposal aimed at bridging what has been a societal gap between black and white. Mix in the last Presidential campaign when John McCain and particularly Sarah Palin replaced the other N-word with the word Muslim and it is clear where the GOP have stood up until now. It did not work because attitudes about race have undergone basic change of the course of the last generation or two.
This is not the first time the world has changed without anyone in the Republican Party noticing; they campaigned against Social Security, unemployment insurance and minimum wage through the mid 1950’s. Perhaps the results of November’s election will convince GOP policy makers that racial politics is no longer politically viable as a national strategy but then Mr. Saltzman’s little Christmas gift seems to say that such a time has not yet come.
December 31, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is not that the Republican Party as an organization or Republicans as individuals are racist; indeed that is not the case. Rather the Republican Party as an institutional organization and its officials, candidates and office holders at the state national and local levels, have been willing to at the very least least, turn a blind eye to racism and allowed their operatives to quietly used a less than equal view of race as a strategic tool in campaigns for the past forty years.
From Richard Nixon’s Southern Strategy, which trumpeted “law and order” at a time of civil unrest and violence in African American communities it is a hop skip and jump to George Bush-the-Elder’s infamous Willie Horton attack ad and a legislative history of opposition to nearly every proposal aimed at bridging what has been a societal gap between black and white. Mix in the last Presidential campaign when John McCain and particularly Sarah Palin replaced the other N-word with the word Muslim and it is clear where the GOP have stood up until now. It did not work because attitudes about race have undergone basic change of the course of the last generation or two.
This is not the first time the world has changed without anyone in the Republican Party noticing; they campaigned against Social Security, unemployment insurance and minimum wage through the mid 1950’s. Perhaps the results of November’s election will convince GOP policy makers that racial politics is no longer politically viable as a national strategy but then Mr. Saltzman’s little Christmas gift seems to say that such a time has not yet come.
December 31, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Macaboros
December 31, 2008 10:09 AM I think the repubs did everything in their power to bring out racism and hatred. Hell, even McCain had to tell Palin to tone it down.
So, my question is, what planet do you come from?
December 31, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stupid and unnecessary. Just shows dumb these people are.
December 31, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
mary from TN, as I have provided direct quotes for my claims, to validate yours, could you please provide quotations?
I have yet to see either of those two mention anything of that nature regarding Obama.
December 31, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
This reminded me of a sexual harrassment training I had to take.
The main point was that it doesn't matter what the intent was even if it was just a joke. All it takes is for the receiver(s) to be offended, then it is sexual harrassement period. We will fire you on the spot because we don't want the trouble.
In this case, all it takes is one person to get offended, then the song is racially motivated. Techinally the word "negro" is not a racist word. I thought the word came from Spanish language if I remember my high school Spanish correctly. Personally, Saltsman should had more common sense then trying to do this. I mean he is a public figure therefore public image is everything.
December 31, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
To me, the most revealing thing is how those Republicans just don't get it.
I mean, they really just don't get it.
They can't even understand how the majority of the USA sees their behavior, and finds it objectionable.
That, more than any other single thing, tells me that they are history.
January 6, 2009 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink