« Obama Calling On Blago To Resign | Home | Franken Camp Ratchets Up Pressure On Vote-Counters »

Obama Team Rolls Out New Web Site That Takes Questions From Public

This is pretty interesting: An Obama aide points out to us that the Obama transition team has just rolled out an innovative new feature on its Web site, hoping to carry through on the President-elect's campaign promises of greater government transparency.

It's a page entitled "Open For Questions," in which anyone can submit questions to the transition and, subsequently, to the administration.

The rub, though, is this: The public is able to vote on how much they'd like certain queries to be a priority, and the voting tally is visible -- which means it'll be tougher for the Obama team to not answer questions that participants clearly want answered.

Here's how it works: Users get three options in voting on a question. They can vote in favor of a question being answered; they can vote against it being answered; or they can flag the question as inappropriate.

The Obama team is clearly exposing itself to a bit of a risk here. It could find itself choosing between answering an uncomfortable question and ducking one that the public is clamoring for an answer to. And if the state of the country fails to improve (or gets even worse) over the next few years, the public could also end up registering more and more negative questions.

The new page is here.


49 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I almost forgot we were in transition.

user-pic

As Jon Stewart said, its like having a bike under the x-mas tree. We know its a bike, we want the bike but we have to wait until x-mas. Just give us the dam bike already.
Whether this works or not is one thing, but the main point is that they are trying new way to reach out to America and get them more involved, and to make government more transparent. The mind set of the incoming administration is a complete 180 compared to the current administration.

user-pic

The skip button has "meh.." shown when you go over it. love it.

user-pic

so funny. and in quotes, too. thanks!

user-pic

This sounds great. It's like having a direct line to the Presidency.

Anyone have any idea how you would ask a current administration member a question? Or any in the past for that matter.

Indeed fulfilling Lincoln's creed; of the people, by the people, for the people.

user-pic

how many of these questions will actually be answered?

i am guessing that the questions that will be answered will be answered by staff. not that there's anything wrong with that, but why should we kid ourselves to think that these questions (legitimate or otherwise) will ever be addressed by the president-elect?

user-pic

They're providing the opportunity to even ask. That's quite a step forward from the current disaster.

user-pic

definitely true.

user-pic

The response from O's Administration is good enough for me. The point is that the Administration will be responsive.

user-pic

It must be wildly busy right now--I tried to sign in and got an error message. Shows the power of TPM. :-)

user-pic

Got my question in. :)

I was going to ask if they were going to have a Masters Degree as a requirement for President but instead asked about natural gas.

You'd figure with such an important job a Masters at a minimum would be a requirement. I think a test on civics should be administered and the results provided to the public would be a hoot.

user-pic

George W. Bush has an MBA from Harvard.

How did that work out?

user-pic

Better than Sarah Palin would have.

Bush at least came from a political family and wasn't totally unprepared. Palin will never be prepared.

user-pic
You'd figure with such an important job a Masters at a minimum would be a requirement.

Word up. I'm telling ya, after that Sarah Palin scare I'm convinced we have to do something.

Love this web site and love the way President Awesome keeps promises.


user-pic

That's exactly who I had in mind...

user-pic

A Master's degree is no guarantee that the individual holding it won't be a complete and total idiot.

Seriously. One might think that an advanced degree should reliably signal something about the holder of said degree. As a holder of a Ph.D., and an observer of higher academia for the last 15 years, I'd say that having an advanced degree reflects one's ability to persevere more than anything else. There's a basic level of competence that must be met, but that's it.

user-pic

Of course not, CT, but it does mean that they are more likely than someone with a BA in Sport Journalism they got through the mail to at least know the names of the goddamn continents.

Later - I'm off again./

user-pic

Hey--she went to three times as many schools as PE Obama did to get that Sports Journalism degree! Doesn't quantity count for anything anymore?

:-)

user-pic

Still don't agree. Sarah Palin could have gotten her Master's degree, and still be as clueless as she is. She would still have the same lack of intellectual curiosity as she does now.

There are loads of institutions that would grant a Master's to Gov. Palin. So then it qualification would have to be "Master's from a qualified university", and then we're just getting into goofy-land.

I understand the desire to somehow prevent a Palinization of the government, but a minimum degree isn't going to do. I know too many idiots who have their Ph.Ds, and Masters.

user-pic

Yes, it's no guarantee of creativity or ingenuity. Indeed one of the most mindless people I ever met had a Ph.D. Seemed he's just done what his adviser wanted for a dissertation.

But some of us survive with our ingenuity intact!

user-pic

Love this web site and love the way President Awesome keeps promises.

Good Lord. President Awesome? What's next? President Dreamy?

This cult of personality among a few TPMers is really getting out of hand.

user-pic

What about a test on the Constitution?

user-pic

I think Constitutional questions would be covered under a civics test. Maybe I'm confused though which wouldn't be surprising. ;)

user-pic

Yup!

user-pic

I guess Lincoln would be unqualified.

user-pic

No, they should just make the President pass the Foreign Service Exam. a) WAY harder than getting a Masters Degree and b) also probably more relevant. I bet Obama (can I just start calling him President-Elect Bicycle?) would pass. I think it goes without saying that our Still-President would not.

user-pic

Well I tried it. Submitted a question and rated about 50...

Too many questions too little time I fear

user-pic

"The rub, though, is this: The public is able to vote on how much they'd like certain queries to be a priority, and the voting tally is visible -- which means it'll be tougher for the Obama team to not answer questions that participants clearly want answered."

Well, youngsters, that's what we call Accountability! How novel that concept seems, thanks to the current bunch of thugs who think we only deserve an "accountability moment" every 4 years!

user-pic

How long does it take to demonstrate openness in government? Apparently, not long.

user-pic

Like Tena, I simply grow more pleased with our president elect with each passing day. I think that this is a great idea (and an undeniable improvement over what we have now). Meanwhile, I look forward to reading with amusment the "questions" that they will be cooking up over at RedState and No Quarter.

user-pic

My questions is split so far 21 For, 20 Against.

This is EXCITING!

user-pic

29 Yeahs 23 Nay's so far. woohoo In position 187 so far and rising!!!

user-pic

FYI, the app running on change.gov is an instance of Google Moderator (http://moderator.appspot.com/).

user-pic

My former employer did something like this.

They had one that was internal for employees and one that was external for customers.

It proved very hard to ignore and a vocal minority was able to push for changes that would otherwise not have been made. This is really a great idea for government.

How terrifying for Republicans that there is a competent Democrat who is going to show the American public that government can work on the national level. Eventually people will realize that if it can work nationally it can work locally, too, and then the jig might be up for anti-government conservatism.

user-pic

How terrifying for Republicans. . .

That's what I've been thinking. The whole way Obama operates is just wigging them out completely. It's awfully fun to watch!

user-pic

I can't ask a question because of a server error. My question would be:

Why would appointing officials who enabled the financial collapse (in particular by pushing uncontrolled deregulation) be the best move in fixing the problem instead of people who correctly warned of the dangers and saw the bubble coming in advance?

user-pic

So, which people would that be, again, Mr. Pundit, what have they been appointed to, and what, exactly, did they do to enable the financial collapse? And please, do be specific.

user-pic

Summers for one.

user-pic

That would be what we call a "loaded question".

user-pic

More than anything else, this reminds me of the UK Prime Minister's online petitions system. It's a nice touch and does push the PM to respond to popular issues, but it does nothing to ensure those responses are relevant or to the point. More conventional political pressure must still be applied.

user-pic

As it should be. Online input should not dominate decision making, it should only stimulate and inform internal discussions.


user-pic

also growing larger each day is "your seat at the table" with pdf submissions, including a welcome for you to submit yours...amen to those who have them, from one who reads them.

user-pic

"The rub, though, is this"

That's a terrible characterization. It's the GOAL, not the hidden cost. There's no implicit guarantee about the quality or quantity of the "answers" etc., nor who will be writing the answers.

I think it's a fine addition/improvement to the options they already had at the site. But it's not without its weaknesses; it can be manipulated by groups or devious individuals pushing scores up or down. And it could just be a fad which gets a lot of initial interest but doesn't have the payoff for us peons to keep us coming back. That would leave it as just another "special interest group" lobby of sorts.

Let's see how it grows.

user-pic

Long-timer lurker. I wanted to sign up at change.gov so I could get in on all this accountability stuff, but unfortunately the site is not secure. Not a big deal (my trust level in the transition team is quite high), but we IT types spend a lot of time telling people not to supply any personal information or passwords on sites that don't have "the little lock" or "https" in the URL. I'm surprised the webmaster of change.gov is letting passwords get sent unencrypted over the internet. Sent her/him an e-mail asking for an SSL encryption upgrade.

Anyway, if you signed up using a password that you use in other places, you might want to go change it (close the barn door firmly after the horses are out).

I'm going to go read what people are asking. Can't wait for the first answer.

user-pic

And...well......TPM has the same problem. No encryption on the profile update/change password page. It's a wild wild internet out here.

Anyway, enough with the threadjack, sorry. Back to your regularly-scheduled comments. I'll go back to lurking.

user-pic

This site is sure to be spammed by the haters of freeper nation. Just do a search on "Blagojevich" and see what I mean.

user-pic

What's up with this question?

"Why are we rebuilding our national highway system instead of building high-speed passenger rail and revitalizing our cities and towns through the development of mass transit? Is this not key to our long-term economic and environmental well being?"

Did Obama specifically say he wanted to "rebuild the national highway system"? I heard him say that his stimulus plan would be the biggest since the national highway system, but is the plan to rebuild it? I thought mass transit and light rail were part of the plan...

user-pic

That site is already being spammed by the hateful anti-choice freaks. You will notice the exact same anti-choice question appears numerous times, but with different people submitting it.

user-pic

Gotta look at the "votes" for and against promoting the question(s) for answer, too. Since login is required to post or vote, there is at least some ability to track who's promoting what issues.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address