Obama On Today's Job Loss Announcement: This Crisis Gives Us Big Opportunity
Barack Obama, responding to today's announcement of the worst job losses in over three decades, puts out a statement heavy on the "crisis as opportunity" rhetoric:
"The 533,000 jobs lost last month, the worst job loss in 34 years, is more than a dramatic reflection of the growing economic crisis we face. Each of those lost jobs represents a personal crisis for a family somewhere in America. Our economy has already lost nearly 2 million jobs during this recession, which is why we need an Economic Recovery Plan that will save or create at least 2.5 million more jobs over two years while we act decisively to maintain the flows of credit on which so many American families and American businesses depend."There are no quick or easy fixes to this crisis, which has been many years in the making, and it's likely to get worse before it gets better. But now is the time to respond with urgent resolve to put people back to work and get our economy moving again. At the same time, this painful crisis also provides us with an opportunity to transform our economy to improve the lives of ordinary people by rebuilding roads and modernizing schools for our children, investing in clean energy solutions to break our dependence on imported oil, and making an early down payment on the long-term reforms that will grow and strengthen our economy for all Americans for years to come."
The key line, of course, is the assertion that the crisis affords an opportunity for genuine transformation. It will cheer many liberals, such as Robert Borosage, who have been arguing that the crisis affords Obama an enormous opportunity to be bold and think big.















He is in line behind Chris Matthews, who started waxing poetically over Obama as the new FDR the minute the election was called for him.
That's fine - I agree. But it's not like 2000 people other than Borosage haven't already had this same thought.
December 5, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
agreed, is not an original idea -- borosage is a high profile proponent of it, though
December 5, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wasn't slamming your link to him, just sayin. I have had the same idea and hope since before the election, myself. I had hopes for James Van's green economy program becoming a jobs program.
I think that was Van's intent, as well.
December 5, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
What's worth noting is that going bold and big FDR-style has won the argument. The CW is that Obama it's going to happen. So to a large degree liberals have won the PR war.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
December 5, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's Van Jones I'm talking about. He and James Rucker run Color of Change and I compressed them into one name: James Van
Sorry.
December 5, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Geez. It must be a disaster out there for so many Americans...and what floors me is all the Republicans that would rather fiddle while America crashes down around them.
December 5, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Kind of tells you everything you need to know about their very special definition of the word "patriotism".
December 5, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans have a way of taking my breath away with their utter cluelessness and they don't seem of a mind to figure out what their problem is, either. They just seem intent on compounding their failures.
Goody.
December 5, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama post-partisan rhetoric is either a brilliant play to paint the Republicans into a "put up or shut up" corner or will turn out to be a venue for them to sabotage any chance for recovery by insisting on things like more capital gains tax cuts, and I dunno, school prayer.
December 5, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
My money is on "paint them into a corner."
But then, I always thought this "post partisanship" was really a clever way to defuse obstructionism without really ceding too much to the other side. It's as if Obama's saying, "I'm willing to be reasonable, why aren't you?"
December 5, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think their goal will be (as a reader commented to Josh yesterday) to sabotage Obama as much as possible, so that they have something to run on in 2010.
My hope is that Obama and his aides consider this as well, and the "post-partisanship" theme is the opening salvo to prevent that.
December 5, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Katrina. Many repubs would stand by and let it happen again nowon a national scale. Breaks my heart!
December 5, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Katrina was national. I guess the Bush years can be defined nationally in 3 sad blurbs: 9/11, Katrina, and economic meltdown.
December 5, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unlike 2001, this time around Republican economic policy is broadly seen as the culprit. Working people red and blue are paying the price for Bush's gilded age.
In this environment, I don't think even deep conservatives will be as easily persuaded to act against their own economic self interest. Of course I've been making the same observation for almost ten years so what do I know.
December 5, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI. Robert Borosage is from Campaign for America's Future, not Center for American Progress.
December 5, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
>>"It will cheer many liberals">>
But, first they'll have to stop having a cow because Obama is appointing people from the Clinton administration to help carry out his FDR-like plans.
You see, the *appearance* of change is much more important than real change.
December 5, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just had to shake my head the other day after Obama's meeting with the Governors when Perry from TX and Sanford from SC apparently raised their concerns about the federal deficit growing because of Obama's plans. All I could think of is "Where the f*** have you two been the last 8 years?"
December 5, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Governor Goodhair has hair for brains.
December 5, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding. I think he's probably been poisoned by all of that hairspray.....starting to affect his brain functions.
December 5, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're being far to kind to Sanford. He is truly useless -- even more useless than our legislature. The other day Darla Moore, a venture capitalist and head of a pro-business policy group, issued a pretty stiff rebuke of Sanford's "tax policy," under which growth tax revenues has staggered along below the inflation rate and education funding was shifted from the property tax to the sales tax. The Guv'nors office responded, appropriately, that our abysimal per capita GDP and income are due to unrestrained growth in taxes and government spending. I take "usesless" back -- even with perfect hair he is vilely incompetent. If you don't believe in government, don't run for office.
December 5, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the same undisclosed location from which they watched Bush and Cheney to trample over the government.
They're deeply "concerned" about the deficit now, and no doubt they and other Republicans will be suddenly "concerned" about the abuse of executive power, now that a Democrat is in office.
December 5, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
We really are at, indeed past, the point where the only appropriate response to ANYTHING a conservative says is "STFU- you morons have done enough damage already".
December 5, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we all stop debating Obama's intentions now? I never doubted for a second that his instincts were correct and that he sees this as an opportunity to transform our economy into a green one.
Having said that - the economy continues to spiral rapidly out of control and it's getting flat-out scary now. No matter what best intentions are, this thing is getting horrible very quickly.
December 5, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think we need to give Obama wide latitude here - and all our support - to help him reach the heights he's capable of and let him ask that of us as well.
I'm ready to lay out there what I envision. (I have.) And work for it. But I'm also ready to accept that we can't have everything. Obama is sitting in a very tight spot. I'm wagering he's an honorable man, deeply responsible, doing the best he can to access advice and make decisions. It does no good to create logjams. Let's get out the way or contribute, but not obfuscate.
December 5, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is a liar, and MI and Ohio were had. If this man had any intentions of honoring his campaign promises, he wouldn't be backtracking on pulling troops out of Iraq or renegotiating NAFTA; and he wouldn't have flip flopped on FISA, or whipped 780B taxpayer dollars to WS while he sits on his butt and lets the domestic autos and UAW die.
After Clinton and Obama, unions need to learn that with friends like these, they don't need any enemies. I see third party votes in their futures. Fool them once........
December 5, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
O sweet Jesus Jumping the Broom!
No, Obama is not a liar, MI and Ohio were not had and you don't know yet that he is going back on any campaign promises because:
He hasn't even taken the oath of office yet. He can't break promises until he's in office.
December 5, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink