In Private Memo, RNC Chief Concedes That GOP Is Bereft Of Ideas, Vows Change Of Direction
In a frank and private memo sent today to Republican National Commitee members, the RNC chairman acknowledges that the GOP has grown too addicted to ideology, places politics before policy, and is bereft of ideas -- and that it's imperative that the party shift towards a genuine effort to develop concrete policy solutions to people's problems in order to rescue itself.
The memo, which we obtained from a Republican operative, was written by RNC chief Mike Duncan to explain the RNC's decision -- first reported by Politico -- to create a new in-house think tank called the "Center for Republican Renewal," which is devoted to coming up with new policies and ideas to chart a new direction for the party after November's devastating losses.
The memo -- which reflects just how deep a hole the party finds itself in -- also reveals some concrete details about the new think tank, including the appointment of Steven Duffield, the executive director of the GOP's 2008 Platform Committee, as the organization's new chief.
"Republicans have grown accustomed to having our party recognized as the `Party of Ideas,' but we must acknowledge that many Americans today believe the party is stale and does not deserve that label," reads one of the memo's starker assessments, adding that "we have not used our principles to provide solutions to the kitchen table concerns of middle-class America."
"We must recognize that being the `Party of Ideas' requires daily effort to apply principles to the particular public policy questions of the day," the memo says. "All Republicans have an obligation to develop principled solutions rather than falling back on ideology alone; we must show how our ideology can be applied to solve problems."
The assessment by Duncan, who's running for re-election as RNC chair, is a more straightforward acknowledgment of the party's deeply-rooted problems than we've heard from many of his opponents in the race. One GOP strategist opines to us that Duncan's willingness to speak frankly about such problems, and his creation of the center, could appeal to committee members who will select the next chairman.
The memo also says that the Renewal think tank is creating a "Board of Advisers" that will include former GOP cabinet secretaries, current and former high-level state and federal office-holders, and other Republican leaders. Full memo after the jump.
Republican National Committee
To: RNC National Committee MembersFr: Chairman Robert M. "Mike" Duncan
Re: The Center for Republican Renewal
Date: Friday, December 19
I am pleased today to announce the creation of the Center for Republican Renewal, a new office of the Republican National Committee that will identify, generate, and promote public policies that advance Republican principles of sound governance. I began exploring this idea in the days immediately following the November election. I would like to take this opportunity to explain the concept and how you as a Committee Member can participate in this exciting new endeavor.
Background and Context: Pre-Reagan and Pre-1994
The Center for Republican Renewal is a natural development given the political landscape and follows on previous efforts in this vein after the elections of 1976 and 1992. In each of those years, a Democrat was elected president with vague promises of change and came to power with strong Congressional majorities and a majority of governorships. Moreover, the Republican "brand" was in trouble due, in large part, to self-inflicted wounds.
As we all know, circumstances quickly shifted in our favor. In 1980, the party rebounded and we had Ronald Reagan in the White House, a Republican Senate, and several new Republican governors. In the historic 1994 election, we gained control of both houses of Congress and a majority of governorships - after earning only 36 percent of the presidential vote just two years prior.
Those quick comebacks in 1980 and 1994 did not just happen. They took hard work and smart thinking - not only from the standpoint of candidate recruitment, fundraising, and political strategy, but also from the standpoint of ideas. Put simply, Republicans gave voters a reason to elect them, and that reason was better policy. Each time, the driving force behind the resurgence of our Party was the Republican National Committee.
In 1977, RNC Chairman Bill Brock pushed the party into the work of ideas with twin endeavors: first, the creation of a quarterly public policy magazine, Commonsense, which embraced serious policy discussion as a vehicle for innovative policies and breakthrough ideas; and second, the formation of "Policy Councils," groups of public policy experts from across the nation who advised the party and its leaders on the best approaches to the nation's problems. These efforts were central to backing up the claim that Republicans were the "party of ideas," and were a precursor to the Reagan Revolution in 1980.
In 1993, RNC Chairman Haley Barbour responded to the previous year's defeats by committing the party to intellectual engagement, reviving the Commonsense magazine and going so far as to create a separate entity to develop policy alternatives. He explained this decision through "three premises: that fundamentally, ideas make a difference in politics; that, traditionally, ideas which make a difference have been associated with political parties; and, that currently, such ideas are less likely to be found inside the Washington beltway - and its thinking - than outside." The RNC's enthusiasm for debate and intellectual engagement fed directly into the development of the Contract with America and the Republican Revolution of 1994.
The common thread of these two periods - pre-1980 and pre-1994 - was that the Republican Party showed it was confident enough with its principles and core values that it could embrace debate and even disagreement in the pursuit of superior public policy solutions.
The Decision to Create the Center for Republican Renewal
It was in light of this history that I decided in early November to commit the RNC to a similar, policy-focused effort. Republicans have grown accustomed to having our party recognized as the "Party of Ideas," but we must acknowledge that many Americans today believe the party is stale and does not deserve that label. This is not a critique of our principles of a strong national defense, growth-focused economics, constitutionally-limited government, and a defense of traditional values. Rather, it is a reflection that we have not used our principles to provide solutions to the kitchen table concerns of middle-class America.
We must recognize that being the "Party of Ideas" requires daily effort to apply principles to the particular public policy questions of the day. All Republicans have an obligation to develop principled solutions rather than falling back on ideology alone; we must show how our ideology can be applied to solve problems. When we have a Republican President, that challenge falls to the White House and Congress. However, when the table is set as it is today, the RNC must play an enhanced role.
I believe we have an opportunity - and an obligation - to regain the American people's trust by showing them that it is the Republican Party that will provide the principled policies that will better improve the lives of all Americans. To do that, we must:
* Always bear in mind that good policy is good politics and that the Party should play a fruitful role in identifying and generating innovative ideas.
* Seek solutions outside of Washington, D.C. - listening directly to the American people and learning from those who are grappling with real problems.
* Remember that the laboratories for Republican policymaking are in the states, counties, cities, and towns of our nation, not in the halls of a Democrat-dominated Congress.
* Help coordinate policy approaches and alternatives between Congress, the Governors, and state and local officials.
* Be open to principled solutions no matter where they originate.
* Use new technologies to better create communities of support and innovation, and build those communities around shared ideas.The Republican Party must not cede the policy field to the Democrats, and it must use the tools at its disposal to expand the portfolio of ideas that our candidates will have in the next cycle. As former Chairman Brock wrote in 1977, "the contest for votes must also be a contest for ideas." The Center for Republican Renewal will be dedicated to that proposition.
Structure and Leadership of the Center for Republican Renewal
The Center will be a division within the RNC and will operate from our national headquarters. Its budget has been approved by the RNC Budget Committee. At the outset, we anticipate a staff of approximately ten dedicated employees.
The executive director of the Center will be Steven J. Duffield. Many of you know Steven as the executive director of the 2008 Platform Committee, which produced a platform that was praised widely as being concise, principled, and forward-looking. Steven came to the Platform Committee after serving as a leadership policy advisor and chief counsel to Senator Jon Kyl (AZ) at the Senate Republican Policy Committee.
We will also be recruiting RNC Members and other conservative leaders to assist the Center with strategic planning and guidance as a Board of Advisors to the Center. In addition to RNC Members, this Board will include former Cabinet Secretaries, current and former Governors and Members of Congress, leaders of conservative Policy groups, and other Republican leaders.
Overview of Projected Activities
The Center will be aggressive and very active in the policy community. In general terms, we can group its projected activities into three areas: 1) increased policy focus through RNC activities; 2) nationwide policy outreach; and, 3) extensive policy debate and discussion.
First, the Center will be a resource to you as a Member of the Republican National Committee and to other Republicans because we will now have in-house experts on current policy issues and debates. The Center's analysts will create detailed policy products, from fact sheets and backgrounders to critiques of proposed legislation, which will be fact-intensive and professionally crafted to ensure accuracy. These products will be useful to RNC members, to our new Speaker's Bureau, to our Communications team, and to Republicans across the nation. This written product will be developed in cooperation with Republican elected officials both in Washington and in the states.
Second, the Center will engage in aggressive policy outreach throughout the nation. This will be one of many opportunities for your direct involvement with the Center. This outreach will include the reestablishment of the Policy Councils so that we can draw on the substantive expertise of policy experts who work with Republican Governors and legislators, Congressional leaders, and think tanks nationwide. The goal is to learn constantly and ensure that potential applications of our Republican principles are fully understood, shared, and promoted.
Third, the Center will be committed to the debate and discussion of ideas. We believe that it is best to have policy discussions within the party and that we should not fear disagreement. To that end, the Center will build on the 1977 and 1993 efforts with Commonsense by developing a new website devoted to public policy. We will invite original content from experts and then encourage debate. This will be another opportunity for Member involvement with the Center. The website also will host policy blogs that will provide forums for substantive analysis of the key issues facing the nation, and input from the public will be gathered on a systematic basis. Our goal is to grow a community founded on common goals and aspirations.
As the months pass, we anticipate the Center branching into other areas and finding other tools and tactics that will advance our ideas. It will be a nimble operation that is quick to shift when circumstances demand it.
Conclusion
I am very excited about the Center for Republican Renewal because I believe it is an integral part of our rebuilding process. I look forward to your suggestions on how to make the most of this new endeavor.















Say "g'night," GOP.
After the regional party flipped the bird at the autoworkers and the rust-belt, to paraphrase LBJ: you've lost the Midwest for a generation.
Now go slink back into your diminishing corner.
December 19, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
They've been flipping the bird to the Midwest since Reagan. He was the prototypical union-buster, and he did bust PATCO. I never could figure out why these union-types voted for him in such large numbers.
December 19, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Until they acknowledge that their ideology is broken, they're hosed. And they can't acknowledge that their ideology is broken without purging most of their elected officials.
December 19, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nah. Memories are short. They didn't do anything in the 1994 "Revolution" that they hadn't done before. They just dressed it up and put a little lipstick on it and fooled enough people to get themselves elected. They've been railing against the Inheritance tax for generations, without getting any traction. Rename it the Death tax and voila! It's amazing how easily people are fooled. The only saving grace is that eventually they catch on, although it usually takes some kind of crisis or disaster.
December 19, 2008 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
They've run the country into the ground for 28 years on ideology alone. Why change now?
December 19, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know with NAFTA, Don't Ask/Don't Tell, the Defense of Marriage Act, workfare and so forth it can be confusing, but Clinton was a Democrat.
December 19, 2008 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, does anyone remember that before "Don't Ask Don't Tell" the army had an outright ban on Gays serving? Does anyone remember that Don't Ask Don't Tell was the result of a compromise between Clinton (who wanted to allow Gays to serve openly) and a Republican opposition in Congress that wanted to continue putting gay solders in military prisons?
There are plenty of areas where we can be disappointed in Clinton's presidency. Why do good Democrats insist on rewriting history to find even more to hate.
December 19, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that D-O-D-T has had zero positive effect as far as reducing the number of gays booted from the armed services. If so, then what is there to celebrate Clinton for on this? "He tried"?? Pah-lease.
And while I'm at it Mr. Al I-hate-global-warming Gore had eight years in the second most powerful job in the world, two of those with a Dem congress, and he didn't do diddly to reign in carbon pollution. Now he points back to those in power and says they need to take responsibility.
The two of them, Clinton and Gore, were trepidacious about everything that could in any way be considered left-leaning and full-throated in their support of right-wing action items like NAFTA and destroying the welfare support system.
December 19, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can't really believe that, can you?
Gore didn't set policy. He did what he was told. Pretty much like all Veeps up to Cheney.
But perhaps that's where your impression of the VP's office being powerful comes from.
Truth is, Dickwad didn't make his office powerful; he made himself powerful. He had Dubya's ear since Dubya picked him in 2000 as his VP-search "committee."
Dickwad convinced Dubya to pick him for VP and install his doofus puppet Rummy as DoD Sec'y. Pulling the strings at DoD gave him huge power.
Plus, Dubya is kinda stupid. No way he could win an argument with Dickwad. In fact, it's hard to imagine Dubya even entertaining the notion that Dickwad might be wrong without bunches of other voices whispering in his ear that that was the case. Even then, it took getting burned five or six times to awaken in Dubya any doubts.
Can you imagine Gore pulling that kind of shit on Clinton and getting away with it? No, I thought not.
Characterizing Gore as having held the second-most powerful job in the world just seems kinda silly.
December 19, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Putting aside your condescension about my supposed confusion between Gore and Cheney, excuse me but Gore was just a heartbeat away from the presidency and didn't do squat for global warming in eight years. You can make excuses for that. You can try to insult the folks that dare point it out. But facts is facts.
When Gore held power, whatever you want to squabble that power amounted to, global warming just wasn't a pressing to him as it was before or after he was VP. Only in the last few years did he manage to begin reducing the carbon footprint for his mansion, and that was only after pressure from those more willing to take radical steps than Gore. He's good at telling other people what to do.
Now, don't get me wrong, I'd of much rather seen Gore as Pres than Bush, by a factor of 10,000. But I seriously doubt if he was Pres he would have done much to mitigate climate change based on his actions as Senator and VP, in which he did next to nothing.
December 20, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
With respect, as a gay former military officer, I remember Bill Clinton quite differently.
The newly-elected Clinton announced in December 1992 (if memory serves) that one of his earliest acts as Commander-in-Chief would be to end the ban on gays in the military. It was a courageous move -- and also, unfortunately, an ill-prepared and poorly timed one.
Clinton had failed to do any of the political legwork (or, it seemed, brainwork) needed to pull off a sudden policy change of such symbolic force. He had failed to prepare or to consult with anyone at the Pentagon or elsewhere in the military establishment. He had failed to talk things through with key players on Capitol Hill, like Sam Nunn. His heart unquestionably was in the right place.
The reaction was furious, not only on the Right but in military circles that were much less politicized in that era than they are today. Clinton emerged badly wounded politically, and the Don't-Ask compromise was almost certainly the best that could have been salvaged from the political maelstrom.
In some ways you could read this as an inauspicious preview of how the health-care effort was destined to unravel -- this same marriage of noble intentions with extreme, almost culpable naivety about the real-life workings of Washington.
The noble intentions are still worth recognizing. Clinton's sincere effort on our behalf does not deserve to be trivialized. It's also ironic, in that he's got the reputation of being masterful at the game of politics but slippery at such things as ethics and principle. In the case of gays in the military, he was quite the converse.
This is all worth remembering, as we watch Obama maneuver much more deftly and slyly, surrounding himself with the kind of people who understand how to get things done in DC.
December 20, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Noble intentions, huh? Okay, if you want to hang your hat on that. Nevermind that DADT led to tangibly more gay discharges than the previous policy.
But my point remains that Clinton, and Gore, were largely ineffectual as Democrats, as supposedly something substantially different than republicans.
Obama saw that they were republican-lite, or simply kinder/gentler republicans, and openly claimed he wanted to be a game-changer for social progress as Reagan was for the values of the right. Hillary, and Bill, took offense at that, and rightly so because Obama was right. If O can deliver on his promises, and he gets the benefit of the doubt from me now, he will represent an end once and for all to the Reagan era that Clinton/Gore/Clinton never did.
December 20, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd argue BillC was a DINO (dem in name only). More accurately called Republican-lite.
That list you made is actually much, much longer. He was terrible for supporting the Telecom Act, privacy invasions via major increases in FBI wiretapping, and on and on. He was kind of the kinder gentler republican that poppy Bush promised after Reagan.
I couldn't bring myself to vote for Clinton a second time, and haven't voted Dem for Pres since, until Obama. I'd love to feel proud to vote for Obama a second time. We'll see...
December 19, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why do they keep calling themselves the party of ideas? They're anything but that. If its some sort of Reaganite throwback, than its been invalid since 1988
December 19, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they call themselves the power of ideas over and over, then this frees them from actually needing to ever have any ideas.
December 20, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only Republicans left are country club rednecks.
December 19, 2008 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Mr. Duncan:
Brilliant analysis, Captain Obvious.
December 19, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
This American believe that the GOP is the party of corporate crime, bigotry, war-mongering, and pandering to morons.
~
December 19, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans have pushed religion for so long, they've turned into a cult. And cultists can't think straight because they're slaves to a belief system that convinces them that the answers to everything have already been revealed in some book, which in their case is the Bible. And so the Republicans find themselves in the same fix the Muslims are in today - backward, bigoted, paralyzed, devoid of creativity, sensing they've been left behind and ANGRY because it's very unpleasant being confused all the time. Being confused all the time is like having Alzheimers. Let them rot.
December 19, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw some Weekly Standard moron on Blitzer this evening talking about more tax cuts (!) and shrinking the budget deficit!
Hoover much???
December 19, 2008 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
OT but on Hardball they showed a short clip from some special on Bush that will be airing at the end of December.
Bush didn't ask Rumsfeld, Powell or Tenet if he should go into Iraq. That's odd to say the least.
December 19, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure whether to be happy or sad that they've figured this out already.
Up until now, everybody in the GOP has been talking about changing their strategy or their message or whatever, coming up with new ways to "communicate their ideas." The whole time, I've been kinda hoping they wouldn't notice that it was their ideas that were the problem all along.
The only principle that consistently applies to the decisions and messages of the Republican party is "whatever benefits the rich." Whether it's less-progressive taxes, union busting, or anything else, the Republican party has become the political arm of the extremely wealthy. Obviously, this does not constitute an "idea."
The "ideas" that provide cover for one political party to act solely in the aims of the extremely wealthy have all been discredited by now: Alan Greenspan, a personal devotee of Ayn Rand, has finally admitted as much. The nail is in the coffin.
The equivalent analogy for the Left would be if the Democratic party were a front for Communism, and made every single decision in such a way as to benefit the working poor, at the expense of everyone else. But the Democratic party has never done this; from FDR to JFK to Clinton to Obama, we've always been at least somewhat moderated towards the pragmatic center.
But for at least the last 15 years, the Repbulicans have been 100% consistent in that their choices always favor the rich regardless of the cost to the rest of society. Even Reagan was more pragmatic in give-and-take than the current crop of R's is today.
If they ever want to develop any other ideas, they need to first chuck out the "idea" of always shilling for the Man.
That said, those who think the Republican party is "dead forever" are as shortsighted as those who believed that real estate never loses value. Or those who thought that the dot-coms "changed everything," etcetera. They'll be back. America can't and shouldn't function as a one-party state. The question is how long they're going to wander in the wilderness, and in what form they'll return.
Our job is to keep them out there for as long as possible - not only to keep society safe from them, but also to keep them navel-gazing long enough to hopefully come close to something like sanity. To do that means earning this chance, and producing reasonable results for as long as possible. Sure, eventually we'll go too far and get caught out as a bunch of freaks, grifters and idiots ("animal voting rights, man, WOO!"). All parties go too far given enough time on top. So the best we can do is extend this period for as long as possible by remaining pragmatic and philosophically disciplined.
As opposed to the goddamn Republicans.
December 19, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign.
December 20, 2008 1:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well stated. I agree wholeheartedly.
December 20, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the party is going to devolve into two wings, the religious fundamentalist wing under Palin and the country club wing under Romney, and neither will prevail any time soon. So get ready for another generational Democratic reign ala FDR.
Oh, and "Those quick comebacks in 1980 and 1994 did not just happen. They took hard work and smart thinking - not only from the standpoint of candidate recruitment, fundraising, and political strategy, but also from the standpoint of ideas. Put simply, Republicans gave voters a reason to elect them, and that reason was better policy."
And look where all that "better policy" has led us. I hope and pray the republican party never sees the light of day again, at least in my lifetime.
December 19, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
it would be better for the country if both parties fractured. but the current voting system highly discourages that. i think we should change the voting system.
December 20, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican Party: where ideas go to die.
You know, good ideas probably do make it into the Republican Party from time to time, but they are always ritually slaughtered on the alter of the religious right.
Sad really.
December 19, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Throughout the decades of Democratic dominance in Congress, Republicans endlessly repeated the mantra of small government as if it was their sole, core belief. Fast forward to '94 when they captured Congress, then to 2000 when Bush was given the White House to give Republicans iron fisted control of the federal government and that mantra turned out to be.....just words. They spent like there was no tomorrow. Tax and spend words became borrow and spend action. I believe that during all those years in the wilderness, while the Republicans complained about Democratic spending and big government, what they really were upset with was not how much, but on what. They just didn't like spending money on social programs and environmental issues, and even more, they really didn't like not having a say in how the money was spent. Once they got full control, we know how they behaved by just recalling the Bush years. They spent like there was no tomorrow.
December 19, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought it was all Pelosi's and Reid's fault. If you ask a dyed-in-the-wool Republican, things went to shit the moment Democrats took back Congress in 2006.
December 20, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
The answer to their dilemma is the head of their 2008 Platform Committee? How tone deaf are they? Their 2008 Platform was out and out war against the middle class and labor, adoration of the wealthiest 10% and corporate interests, and no room for those who do not share the beliefs of evangelical white christians. Forget any moderate or centrist republicans who believe in choice, women's rights, gay/lesbian rights and who abhor the hatred spouted on GOP right wing radio by Rush, Coulter, Ingram, Beck, etc. and were appalled by the Shiavo maneuver. This is their answer? A think tank evolved from their 2008 Platform? The party of Palin - wow.
December 20, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
December 20, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck! How unbelievably out of touch can they be? Don't they know that middle-class Americans don't have kitchen table anymore? They were repossessed by the banks that are also raping our treasury.
December 20, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Basically, the Republican Party's goal is to repeal the entire 20th century, except for the nukes, so the task of the new RRC is to figure out ways to package that goal in words that will appeal to low information voters.
If you read the above memo closely, you'll see that although Brock makes a big deal of talking "outside the Beltway" and listening to ordinary Americans about "kitchen table" concerns, their procedure will be to get ideas and facts from "experts" (presumably safely within the RNC ideological fold) and then present those ideas for discussion. Recent experience suggests that those "facts" will be chosen, manipulated, or cut from whole cloth to fit the desired outcome and that all discussion and suggestions will be gratefully accepted and then ignored unless they suit the predetermined goals.
December 20, 2008 3:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
The concentration of wealth and power is a relentless force throughout history. It feeds off of our fear of death.
There is a reason Ayn Rand hates the idea of subjectivism. She wishes to deny the path to the inner aspects of Man's being - where all our answers are.
December 20, 2008 6:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans only need to change one core principal to begin crawling out of the hole they've dug for themselves: They need to start placing country before Party. If their recent attack ad on Obama is any indication, that's the one concession they'll never be willing to make.
December 20, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love how Duncan says:
"Seek solutions outside of Washington, D.C. - listening directly to the American people and learning from those who are grappling with real problems."
And then says:
"The Center will be a division within the RNC and will operate from our national headquarters."
December 20, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Morning.
The Repugs could start by just learning to like democracy and America for what it is and the potential for more of the kind of greatness that sets us apart. They always want to make the country into a different kind of country -they don't like democracy worth a damn, to judge from how they govern.
December 20, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
The biggest problem with the Republican party is that it's full of republicans.They've crystallized thier philosophy into a little black toxic cesspool of unpalatable policies that the average american voter can't tolerate .They don't base any of thier arguments for anything, we just know what they are against.Arguing with a republican is waste of time and breath.
The only hope for the republicans is to wait.
We're democrats, we'll screw it up somehow.
December 20, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
They just know what they are against - that's why they do best from the minority as an opposition party.
When they had it all, after 2000, they continued to whine like victims every chance they got. They do not know how to be in charge.
They don't.
December 20, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
And PS peeps: Lil Wayne was fucking phenomenal last night and T Pain was awesome, too.
December 20, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
And PS peeps: Lil Wayne was fucking phenomenal last night and T Pain was awesome, too.
December 20, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aw shit - I had hopes that this thing wouldn't start that.
The page hangs and I guess it just keeps posting unless I close it. That's how I posted two singles - I closed down the browser and reopened it.
This is nuts.
December 20, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the GOP's problem right now is, there's no "they" there. This RNC guy is speaking to an empty room. Anybody capable of rational thought has left the party. The only people left are the crazies who think Sarah Palin is, you know, human.
December 20, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
But the Republicans are the Party of Ideas!
Really, really bad ideas.
December 20, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are so right. Duncan is incorrect when he intimates the Repugs are bereft of ideas. They have plenty of ideas ... every last one is B.A.D.
December 20, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
oh yes, they are the party of ideas -- ideas on how to pull the wool over people's eyes so we won't notice when we're lied to while being looted. thanks to there being a major crisis, this time more people noticed (but note that 46.2% didn't, so this is not the time for us to go to sleep, content that the republicans are down for the count).
orwell would have a field day with "small government", "compassionate conservatism", "family values", "no child left behind", the "clear skies" initiative...
those are republican ideas -- pure doublespeak. true conservatism has long since been left by the party.
December 20, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the Dems know what is good for them (no historical evidence exists for this by the way) they will create a similar group on how to not fuck up. That is more likely how the Repubs will re-gain power.
December 20, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
December 20, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've never thought that the gop was the party of ideas. Is that the first thing that comes to anyone else's mind when they think of the gop?
December 20, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mjeffen wrote that middle class kitchen tables were repossessed by banks that are also raping our treasury. Did the Democratic Party vote against those bailouts? Doesn't it stand for the working class? Nonsense.
There is little substantive difference between the Democratic and Republican parties. The former masquerades in support of human rights and social justice and the latter in support of individual liberty and free markets. They are both frauds. They oppose each other to secure spoils. American government feasts on the dying carcass of the nation.
Clinton=Bush=Obama.
Obama voted against the Iraq war. Big deal. He voted for every single appropriations bill. He voted for the Patriot Act and the Military Commisions Act. He will attack Pakistan and Iran as sure as rain in April and he will further the assault on our civil rights. When he does all of this, Democrats will cheer him on because it's just a football game.
December 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not much light inside a black hole of cynicism, is there?
I suggest getting out more, making friends, counseling, medication and/or getting laid.
December 20, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, I am confused. Who exactly described the Republicans as the Ideas party? I didn't. Did you? How about you over there? I didn't think so.
Let's see. They had 12 years of control over Congress and at the same time, 6 years control of the White House.... Hmmmm. Ideas? Ideas?
Nope. Nothing comes to mind.
Instead of soul searching and belly button contemplating which they have never been good at, they just need to double down!
Purge all those wimps! Will, Powell, Buckley and all others. They need to put their money on Rush, Hannity, Gingrich, Kristoll, Coulter, Malkin, Palin and Joe the Plumber. They need to become more nasty, mean and obstructive.
Until the adults of the Republican party are willing to stand up to the tantrum throwing children that have take over a once great party, they are doomed. They have to give up on the mad white southerner and they just ain't gonna do that.
December 20, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
This would be a great idea if politicians really wanted to make a difference. Unfortunately, they are all on "auto-campaign" mode, pitting one party against the other and neither getting anything done other than filling people with hate so they'll spew at each other.
They're doing a damn fine job from what I see here. Lots of great name-calling and nasty remarks.
December 20, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Th Republicans have not learned a thing! Tey are still a party for the rich. Their responses to Wall Street and Detroit shows that. The party is lead by old white men from the South who allow bigots and racisists, along with dumb redknecks like Palin and Joe the Plumber, hannity, Coulter, and Limbaugh fill their empty heads with wortless garbage. They do not deserve to be in power.
December 20, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
This country had been slowly evolving into that which we have sacrificed countless lives opposing--a militant nation with an agenda driven by religious extremists who promote freedom of thought only so long as it does not conflict with their own ideas. Sound familiar? We had become the enemy.
Ever since the 1960's, the GOP consistently has been, and will always be, the party of exclusion, the party that attempts to diminish those who look different than themselves, pray to a different deity, or follow a different lifestyle. They are the party that uses fear and hatred as a weapon to intimidate any who do not share their points of view. The GOP offers 20th century solutions to 21st century problems.
It is time for a fresh perspective, a new philosophy of America's place in the world. It can no longer be us versus them at all costs; the world is far too small for such a narrow-minded point of view.
It is time to embrace those who are different than ourselves and accept them for who they are--it would be the "christian" thing to do. President-elect Obama is the perfect person to lead our nation in this cause and once again transform our nation into a positive, democratic beacon for the rest of the world.
December 21, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Party of ideas? What a farce. I have been enduring their idiot so-called "ideas" since Saint Ronald Reagan was elected. Yeah, he was an idiot too, in the mold of Booosh. Read it and believe it. Problem with the Republican party is that it is an intellectual failure and has been for decades. They clearly can't comprehend that, however.
December 21, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink