« Obama Team Rolls Out New Web Site That Takes Questions From Public | Home | RNC Keeps Hammering Obama Over Blago Mess »

Franken Camp Ratchets Up Pressure On Vote-Counters

The Franken campaign is increasing the pressure in their PR push going into Friday's state canvass board meeting -- a key meeting that could determine whether wrongly-rejected absentee votes are re-admitted, potentially giving the election to Franken.

This new Web vid, rolled out moments ago during a briefing with reporters, is the centerpiece of the new PR push, featuring actual voters saying their absentee ballots were wrongly thrown out:

The Franken team is clearly trying to bring pressure on the state canvassing board -- not to mention reporters -- to take the voting snafus seriously.

"We've made this video because the mistakes don't just affect votes, they affect people," said Franken spokesman Andy Barr during the briefing, later adding: "Those mistakes having been made, we hope that the state canvassing board -- we expect that the state canvassing board would not compound those mistakes by refusing to fix them when they have the chance."

The Franken camp has estimated that nearly 1,000 wrongly-rejected absentee votes are out there. Those votes would probably break Franken's way, as pre-election polling showed Franken winning the absentees overall. So keep a very close eye on Friday's canvass board meeting -- it could very well determine who is sitting as a U.S. Senator from Minnesota this time next month.


30 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

A openly lesbian women got a spot in the Obama admin, good news for the gay/lesbian community.

user-pic

the full report is on huffingtonpost

user-pic

I am very happy about this. And that fact that she is open about it, unlike Condi Rice, is admirable.

user-pic

Puhleeze. Condi Rice isn't gay. She's so obviously taken with Dubya and even slipped up and called him her husband once. I wouldn't be surprised if she's still a virgin but gay? Naaahhh.

user-pic

She co-owns her home with a female in CA. There are viable trails that suggest exactly that.

user-pic

And she loves football.

user-pic

:)

user-pic

I really, really don't think that's true. Rice *never* goes home to CA. She spends the weekends either in DC or with the Bushies.

Besides, if she owns a home with a woman, that's not exactly hiding.

I know tons of lesbians and I like football way more than they do. I also like NASCAR and MEN!

user-pic

This is a great public service as well. I am very happy this video has been made and released.

user-pic

Hey, Amelie, did you know that you're just as bad as those Mumbai terrorists? Evidently Pat Boone gave a speech somewhere about all of the anti-Prop 8 protestors (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28119701) and how they're just as bad as a bunch of terrorists who go around killing innocent civilians. I've started a movement: Seething Lefty Mumbai Terrorists of the World Unite!

user-pic

Damn those tags. . .

user-pic

Okay, I'm in on the movement !!

Pat Boone, white shoes and all, there is a blast from the past :)

user-pic

If I could do HTML tags right I'd link you to an Amazon.com page where they review the "heavy metal" album he did. CTVoter went and found it; the review is hilarious!

user-pic

OMG, the reviews are too funny. Here is YouTube: Metallica vs. Pat Boone, LOL.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw64pU_wAYw

user-pic

Condi Rice isn't gay. She's so obviously taken with Dubya and even slipped up and called him her husband once.

Maybe when she slipped up and said "my husband" she was referring to her partner (in California).

user-pic

Oooooh, now that's an interesting take on it...

user-pic

I'm not familiar with all the standard lawsuits associated with an election such as this but this has class action lawsuit written all over it to me. Perhaps this is just a good piece of propaganda from the Franken camp but it sure makes it look like the canvass board would have to rule in favor of reviewing the absentee ballots.

user-pic

With the FBI hovering around Coleman, right or wrong, it does not look good "appearance" wise. I think this too subliminally helps Franken.

user-pic

If you're going to count checkmarks next to names on a ballot as valid votes, I can't imagine what argument you could make for NOT counting absentee ballots that were shown to have been rejected by administrative error.

user-pic

Plus, if you let officials reject absentee ballots with no possibility of review, it creates an opening for ballot fraud. With a database of voter registration, one could reject ballots with a partisan agenda to influence the election.

user-pic

Who would do such a thing? ;=)

user-pic

Minnesota does not register voters by party affiliation, so your objection is moot.

Basic problem here is that legal decisions about elections rarely follow any law or logic. Whether it is ballot access litigation or election contests, statutes and precedents almost always yield to political calculation and consideration. Case in point: Bush v. Gore.

The two daily papers in the twin cities, both of which endorsed Coleman, have aggravated the situation by presenting Coleman's apparent lead in the recount as if it were an actual lead, whereas it is tentative and only apparent, being dependent on the outcome of the dispute over challenged ballots.

The public, of course, misses that nuance, and sees only that "Coleman is ahead" with every story.

Franken's campaign appears to now realize that they are being clobbered in the p.r. arena . . . and they're trying to punch back. Good.

user-pic

Ok, if you don't have party ID, then you can use some other proxy for party ID to cheat. I am not suggesting this has happened, but that they should guard against it.

user-pic

It's not really moot. They don't register voters by party affiliation, but they sure have their addresses. It would be easy to simply reject a number of ballots from heavily Democratic areas. Not that the Republicans would ever stoop to such a thing....

user-pic

I think the Coleman argument is that the canvassing board has limited rights under Minnesota law and that it has not been granted to power to assess rejected absentee ballots (just like it doesn't have the power to determine if, for example, a convicted felon was properly denied the right to vote). Certain decisions are left to the courts and were not given to the canvassing board.

Not being conversant with Minnesota electoral law, I don't know if that is true or not but it is a colorable argument. Even if it is right to count the improperly rejected absentee ballots, the canvassing board may not be the right forum to make that decision.

user-pic

The Canvassing Board has decided not to judge whether an absentee ballot was wrongly rejected.

However, the Secretary of State's office asked each county to review their rejected absentee ballots and create a pile of wrongly rejected ones.

The counties should next be told to count the ballots in that pile.

user-pic

It appears that Minneapolis has already done so. Other counties should follow suit. The question than is who makes the decision as to whether those ballots should be counted - canvassing board, Secretary of State or the courts.

user-pic

The following post from 538 website might answer this question:
Minnesota's Canvassing Board today unanimously rejected a request by the Al Franken campaign to mandate that absentee ballots initially rejected as invalid be reconsidered, essentially declaring that it does not have jurisdiction to do so. However, the Franken campaign has at least two mechanisms by which those votes may in fact be counted.

The first is that the Canvassing Board will reconvene next week to consider a proposal to have county officials sort through their absentee ballots to determine which absentee ballots appeared to have no valid reason for rejection -- a so-called "fifth pile" of ballots, as there are four valid criteria in Minnesota for rejecting absentees. The Canvassing Board could then rule that ballots in the fifth pile be counted. The Franken campaign seems inclined to let this process play out for now; in the meantime, at least one county (Itasca) appears as though it may re-evaluate the rejected absentee ballots on its own, without awaiting instructions from the state.

The second mechanism would be to do the good, old-fashioned American thing and sue. It is quite likely that the Franken campaign will sue if the Canvassing Board does not mandate that the "fifth pile" ballots be counted; the reporters at The Uptake think such a lawsuit would have a fair chance of prevailing.

user-pic

A fair chance? I would think that if it can be shown that the ballots were rejected by error, there would be no question that they would be counted. The overriding concern in any election is not the candidates but the voter. Elections are about them. If a voter casts his ballot correctly in accordance with the law, I can't think of a single argument you could make not to count it.

user-pic

One would think -- however, the courts are not always man's best friend. PS I hope it was clear that I had forward a post from the website 538.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address