Election Central Morning Roundup
Obama Presser Today; Expected To Name Richardson For Commerce
Barack Obama has a press conference scheduled for 11:40 a.m. ET in Chicago, at which he is expected to announce the nomination of Bill Richardson for Secretary of Commerce. This is another step in Obama's efforts to project the image of competent national leadership on the economy, in order to counteract the negative effects that the presidential interregnum seems to be having on the financial markets.
Biden And Napolitano To Receive Briefing On WMD
Joe Biden and Janet Napolitano will be in Washington this morning for a briefing from former Senators Bob Graham (D-FL) and Jim Talent (R-MO), who head up the Congressionally-created Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism. The meeting is scheduled for 2 p.m. ET.
Obama Still Looking For Intelligence Chief
The Washington Post points out that while Barack Obama has filled out most of his national-security team, he still faces tough choices in selecting his appointees to the intelligence posts. After John Brennan withdrew his name in the face of liberal opposition, current top names floating around are retired Navy Adm. Dennis Blair, Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), and former Deputy Defense Secretary John Hamre.
Bush For Senate (Jeb, That Is) In 2010?
Jeb Bush says he is considering a run for Senate in 2010, for the open seat of retiring GOP Sen. Mel Martinez. On the one hand the Bush name at this point isn't exactly a positive in most of the country -- but Jeb himself still has a solid reputation in the state where he was governor, and would probably be a solid candidate for the GOP and even a slight favorite in this swing state.
Senate Dems Working On "Saxbe Fix" For Hillary
The New York Times reports that Senate Democrats were working last night on the so-called "Saxbe Fix" -- that is, to reverse a recent pay-raise for the Secretary of State in order to prevent Hillary Clinton from being ineligible for the office under the Emoluments Clause. The right-wing (and anti-Clinton) legal group Judicial Watch is already declaring her appointment unconstitutional, but expect this one to be resolved pretty easily and with a decent body of precedent in Hillary's favor.
Report: Becerra Considering Trade Representative Appointment, Hasn't Accepted Yet
Roll Call reports that Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA) is considering -- but has not yet accepted -- an offer to become Barack Obama's trade representative. If he were to accept the offer, Becerra would have to give up 16 years of seniority in the House, which has earned him a seat on the Ways and Means Committee and the vice-chairmanship of the House Dem Caucus.
DC Council's Stimulus Plan: 24-Hour Bar Times For Inauguration
The DC City Council has passed legislation to allow bars to remain open for 24 hours a day from January 17 to the morning of January 21, right after the inauguration, with the ability to serve food the whole time and to serve alcohol until 5 a.m. This measure, which is being undertaken in order to boost the local economy and accommodate the expected avalanche of spectators for the big event, is either a really good idea or a really bad idea.















"Interregnum"?
What a word...LOL!
December 3, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the interegnum is the area of the lower bowel that retains feces until evacuation.
December 3, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's what we need, bunches of drunken revelers rampaging up and down Connecticut Av. for a week! I bet Mr P's will be busy...
December 3, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in the DC area, and I think keeping bars open is a really good and a really bad idea at the same time. Good in that it will certainly boost the economy. Bad in that DC residents are not used to the city being awake that late and there will be a lot of crowd problems when bar hoppers won't leave the city.
Also, they had better keep the metro running 24/7 during this time because I don't want extra drunkards on the streets.
December 3, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Metro! Superb point. It would be just like D.C. to let the bars open 24 hours but keep the Metro closed midnight to 6.
December 3, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
If drunk drivers make you nervous, stay out of northern New Mexico. At any given time on the roads of northern New Mexico, 3 out of every 5 drivers is impaired. There's a road shrine about 15 yards on every highway.
I'm not kidding.
But Eric, you so so funny!
December 3, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
24 hr bars times from Jan 17-21. Is that such a good idea?
Sounds like a lot of drunk people on inauguration day.
December 3, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Could be worse - it could be in Arizona or Florida where they passed right to carry in bars laws. And you can carry concealed. I can't believe there hasn't been more mayhem.
December 3, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing that saves UT is that 60% of the population doesn't drink. Or at least doesn't admit that it drinks. We've got the same concealed carry law, and (as a former military officer) I don't trust a single one of them to shoot straight even when they ARE sober!
December 3, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a former criminal defense lawyer. I had plenty of clients who killed someone in a bar parking lot without a concealed carry law to help.
I couldn't believe it when those laws were passed. All I can say is that I predicted a lot of bad results and I haven't heard anything. That doesn't mean nothing has happened.
Guns and alcohol are just the worst combination imaginable. I'll repeat what I've said for years - I never represented one convicted felon who wasn't drunk when he did the crime. That's the truth. And most of my clients were murderers. For some reason I got appointed to one murder case after another. And I learned one thing - drinking leads to violence in people who are already disposed to be violent. Booze makes it all happen -
December 3, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just recently a client of mine was nearly strangled to death by a drunk husband - who doesn't recall the incident - which she will never forget.
This is a whole other level of protection - or its lack - which is controlled by special interests. Guns. Alcohol.
Thanks for that info, Tena. (and by the way, yesterday on that very long thread, someone seemed to be undermining your words by suggesting your only way of knowing about social issues is from workers you've employed at your NM place) Obviously some must be following a bit of personal info on you... but leaving out the bigger picture. So I'm glad you've supplied it here.
Folks, Tena is not some suburban housewife who comes to TPM like a coffee klatsch. She's talking from years of seeing social ills. She and I may present things very differently - but she's a very compassionate individual behind an apparently tough exterior. Her anger is coming from that place of empathy with people who didn't have money to afford a high priced lawyer. She knows whereof she speaks!
December 3, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I posted one comment back before the election about Charlie Sandoval who is putting a new roof on one of the burro sheds I have along the side of my place in Taos. Those sheds are over 60 years old, the post office used to stable their burros in them; and the only storage I have. One of the roofs was an old tin roof with big ass holes in it so we couldn't use it - it was a giant brown recluse/black widow housing project. So I hired the roofer to reroof the shed and one day I mentioned a conversation we'd had about Obama on the threads.
And for some reason there is someone who will not let that go. It's been brought up a bunch of times now and I'm not sure why. And I'm not losing sleep over it, but I can't figure it out.
Thanks, Thera. You're a good friend. :)
December 3, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Get a room, you two!
:)
December 3, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dorn, if you put the two of us in a room for very long, the energy might generate some new type of power! (the world might not be ready for it!)
Tena, my sense is this: That one piece of info was saved as "ammunition" because your voice is powerful - and they're trying to diminish it by making you out to be some kind of dilettante condescending wealthy lady whose words should be ignored. Or maybe to try and draw your fire. I'd say, ignor it. But, from time to time, in other places, we can redress the balance!
We are up against a subtle enemy. But an enemy nonetheless. On the other hand we here at TPM are like a beehive. Working together, it's a nearly impossible "army" to beat.
I come in peace. Leave your swords. Make plowshares. Join forces!
December 3, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I used to work as a clerk at the Superior Court of Delaware (that's the trial court of general jurisdiction). Only a couple murders made it to trial in front of me, but I got to see plenty of assaults and near deaths. I'd say alcohol was involved in at least half of them. And as the lawyers here will know, those are just the cases that didn't plead out. One of the commissioners was driven to abstinence by the continuing parade of misery (I'm not advocating that anybody give up alcohol since I certainly didn't. But if you saw all the injuries and trauma that I saw in one year, you'd think twice about having that extra drink, too).
Incidentally, after watching them at work, I have nothing but respect for criminal defense lawyers. Working at the courts convinced me not to become one. :)
December 3, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another interesting side issue that pertains to alcohol. A huge percentage of medical problems are due to alcohol abuse. We know of course it has mental health effects too.
But just consider how a national prevention and treatment arm of a Public Health umbrella could simultaneously lower both major crimes and medical use over a lifetime.
December 3, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not advocating prohibition by any means. I don't believe in the government policing our self-destructive tendencies - I'm with Wild Bill Hickock: "Let me go to hell in my own way." But there are some things that just don't make any sense and allowing concealed guns in bars is one of them.
I have seen up close and personal how devastating alcohol can be for people who shouldn't drink = like me. But I'm a minority -most people can drink and handle it. My husband drinks. All my friends do.
December 3, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't try cases - I appealed them.
Appeals are about the law and research and writing. I couldn't be a trial lawyer, I don't think. That's entirely different. I did handle several hundred misdemeanors and every single one pled out, cause I told em too cause you're an idiot if you don't. About 98% of the time, anyway.
December 3, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's a bad one, but I'm going to have to go with "Republicans and power." And I can think of several other contenders based on experience, observation or anecdote (in no particular order):
1. Republicans and alcohol
2. turkey frying rigs and alcohol
3. old girlfriends/boyfriends and alcohol
4. guns and cocaine
5. devout churchgoing siblings and an inheritance
6. people who like to dress up as clowns and unsupervised children
7. propane and teenage boys
8. Kentuckians and dynamite
9. continuious mining machines and meth
10. men and tequila
11. significant others and the password to your email account (see also "3," above), and
12. My Dad and electricity.
But, yeah, guns and alcohol are right up there.
December 3, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Guns and alcohol are at the top of the list. Just ask asshat Plaxico Burress. But never fear, my Giants will defend their Super Bowl title without his help :)
December 3, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gotta second 'my dad and electricity'. One of my most vivid childhood memories was my dad working on a ceiling fan, turning the switch, and then showering sparks mayhem. It was like a waterfall and unfortunately my dad was under it (he was ok).
December 3, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
That sounds like the sort of thing you would see in a Heinlein novel.
In fact, I think I did see that exact arrangement in Beyond This Horizon, except people were expected to carry their guns openly in order to ensure a polite society.
December 3, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
America has been about as surreal a place as you could find these last 8 years, Eric.
The concealed carry laws that got passed are just the tip of the iceberg.
December 3, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
You ain't kidden!
December 3, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The elitist wing of the Democratic party needs to quit implying those who support the Second Amendment are surrealists.
December 3, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that's the law in MT. And I'm all for that--that way I know who is going to be shooting randomly.
December 3, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one that thought Eric was talking about George Bush when he said "the other President".
December 3, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nope - I did, too.
December 3, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's why I followed the link. Curiousity.
December 3, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
George who?
December 3, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rep. Xavier Becerra for trade Representative hmmm.
What do you guys and girls think about this pick?
December 3, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there no one beside Jeb Bush to run for the Florida senate seat? No rising star other than Crist? It would be soooo nice to have a respite from the Bush name, at least for a while.
December 3, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what really grabbed my attention:
Since when does the right-wing know anything about the Constitution, or even care?
December 3, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's a great sign that change really is coming -- the Obama transition teams are all over the federal agencies, examining everything:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/02/AR2008120203489.html?hpid=topnews
December 3, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love that so so much, Ellen.
December 3, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is the presser to name Richardson and only Richardson?
Jeb Bush is lining up a run in 2016. Hillary Clinton didn't run in 2004 because running against the incumbent is a long shot - Jeb Bush knows this as well. I bet his backers will quietly push Jindal to run in 2012. Jeb was always the next one, George was the black sheep.
December 3, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
LMAO! The only way Jeb can run for Pres is if he runs in 2024. There is literally A GENERATION of people who will never vote for a Bush.
December 3, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Inauguaration is shaping up to be one hell of a party.
December 3, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dorn, it's gonna be the party of the century.
I'd give just about anything to go -
December 3, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Correction, "Inauguration".
Not an easy one for the keyboard challenged. And I will be going, got a reservation on Amtrak and a reservation on my DC-Lobbyist-Cousin's couch downtown!
Cannot wait.
December 3, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Trust me, Tena. It's very hard to actually see much during an inauguration if you're in DC (I went to college there). You'll see more of it at home on TV.
It will be a thrilling thing for people to be there, but it's going to be a logistical nightmare in a city with concrete barriers everywhere.
We'll be able to follow everything. Better than if we were on the spot. (I saw that when Kennedy's funeral procession went through the streets.) And we'll feel the energy of the crowds, seeing them better than they'll see themselves.
What a time! It was the best of times. It was the worst of times.
December 3, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Regarding the bar closing time - some believe it's better to leave them open so you don't have a flood of drunks into the streets all at once. Folks can leave when they've had enough. Also say bars close at 2am, but you're ready to leave at 1am but figure might as well stick around for the last hour. Now if it isn't closing, then you leave when you want to.
December 3, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
When I lived in DC, the Metro closed before the bars, so there was a rush then too. Just imagine lots of drunks on a train going over 60mph (Red line). Lots of, um, seasickness.
December 3, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Xavier Becerra should turn down the offer. He has too much seniority built up for lowly post.
December 3, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
"lowly"? Just because it isn't high profile to the regular folks doesn't mean it is "lowly" in any way whatsoever.
December 3, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lowly was probably a poor choice of words. To put it another way - All Cabinet posts are equal, but some Cabinet posts are more equal than others.
How was that?
December 3, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know what you meant but I am saying the position is much more important than you think.
December 3, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The D.C council just created the perfect hangover cure--never get sober!!!
December 3, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love all these Obama press conferences - and it's excellent that they're paying more attention to him and to Bush.
-- Cris
My site: Obama Wallpaper Archive
December 3, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dennis Blair would make a lousy choice for Intel Chief. He has a quite sordid record when it comes to East Timor and Indonesia. As militia and Indonesian military violence was escalating in 1999 Blair went to Indonesia. Instead of delivering a strong message that the Indonesian military should back off, he offered understanding and further U.S. military assistance. The East Timor and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN) describes this here http://etan.org/news/2008/12blair.htm
December 5, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink