Bush: My Biggest Regret Was Failure Of Iraq Intelligence
As if right on cue, Barack Obama's successful national security presser today, in which he declared that the "buck stops with me" and took full responsibility for his presidency's vision, is cast in an even more positive light by the deeply pathetic interview that his predecessor just gave to ABC News.
In the interview, which was conduced by Charlie Gibson, George W. Bush evades responsibility for his catastrophic foreign policies to the last, saying that his greatest regret was over something that he allegedly didn't control -- the intel failure in Iraq:
BUSH: I don't know -- the biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq. A lot of people put their reputations on the line and said the weapons of mass destruction is a reason to remove Saddam Hussein. It wasn't just people in my administration; a lot of members in Congress, prior to my arrival in Washington D.C., during the debate on Iraq, a lot of leaders of nations around the world were all looking at the same intelligence. And, you know, that's not a do-over, but I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess.
Of course, Bush made the decision to overlook all the good intel -- not to mention the claims of those poor forgotten inspectors -- saying that Saddam wasn't really a threat at all, or certainly not one requiring the response Bush himself ordered.
One overlooked thing about this is that not only Bush, but many supporters of the war -- Dems and liberal hawks included -- also have a vested interest in pretending that the good intel never existed and those inspectors never said what they said. Those inconvenient historical facts reflect rather badly on them, too. With so many opinion-makers having vested interests of their own in telling the story this way, history has been tidily rewritten, and Bush is able to make this claim without a peep of objection from his big-time network interviewer.
In other news from the interview, Bush conceded that he was "unprepared for war," though he meant it more by way of saying that he hadn't asked for war. No follow-up from his interviewer about the war of choice Bush started, or the fact that the self-described role of "war president" wasn't one Bush was all that adverse to adopting.
Late Update: Matthew Yglesias adds the crucial context here, which is that it was the complete lack of an "opposition party" that is largely responsible for so much going "down the memory hole."















Bush is one of the reasons that Obama may end up being an incredibly popular President.
If he's even a little competent it will seem incredible compared to what we've had. And combine that with the fact that Obama will be even trying to fix the economy (with infrastructure improvements and job growth in local communities throughout America), the visible evidence of his presidency will be much more evident to most Americans.
December 1, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tend to think that too. and ultimately, what's ironic is that Bush's catastrophic failures -- not to mention "enduring GOP majority" Rove -- make it all the more likely that Obama can produce an enduring Dem majority.
December 1, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes and Bush did perform some miracles. He turned Mr. Tena into a Democrat, for instance.
I do owe Commander CooCoo for that = it wasn't all me by any means. But he listens to me now - since I've been right about literally everything, ever since the moment Bush said he was running.
December 1, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too funny...
December 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a very rare visitor, & even I missed you. Welcome back.
December 1, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Amelie too. We are lucky gals.
December 1, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right, no matter what Obama does, we'll always be able to say 'At least he's not BUSH.'
December 1, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Completely agree!
And as far as "the biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq". The intelligence failure was HIS!
December 1, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ol' Dick Cheney parked his fat ass on Tenet's face long enough to make the latter relent and proceed to cook the books. The whole affair was surely no 'failure' of intelligence. The only intelligence involved was Tenet finally realizing that he'd best produce exactly what the boss wanted or his goose was bound to become toast (or in John Mitchell's terminology, his gonads were gonna get caught in the wringer)!
Why did Tenet so completely cave to Cheney? Was it just his career or was someone's life on the line? Consider the major allegation within Ron Susskind's The Way of The World of a few months back....
December 2, 2008 4:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow - huge change. Bush and Co. have always said that they had no regrets whatever about Iraq and would have done it even without the WMD. Remember when W. couldn't think of anything he had done worng?
December 1, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's because he can't remember anything, period. Fucking sociopath.
December 1, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is funny.
December 1, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict that Thomas Ricks' Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq and Frank Rich's The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth in Bush's America will not be selected for the W Presidential Library.
December 1, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nor Craig Unger's "Fall of the House of Bush" and "The Dark Side" by Jane Mayer...
December 1, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The eerie thing about George W is that he has lived his life utterly free of consequences.
Never has W had to pick up a tab, clean up a mess, earn a dollar, answer for a mistake. Never has George W. Bush had to own up to his actions.
George W is incapable of admitting to owning any portion of an error. Can't do it.
W botched the simple punch line of the "fool me once" aphorism because he is incapable of uttering the phrase "shame on me."
December 1, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dead-on perfect.
I'd just add that his professed religion fits perfectly - born-again xians never take responsibility for anything, either. Once you're saved, you're saved - no matter what horrific sins you commit.
And I say that as a born-again my own self. What a racket!
December 1, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everything is pardoned in advance, therefore everything is cynically permitted. --Milan Kundera
December 1, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, that is completely right. Because Bush never had to struggle and never admitted failure, his character disorder became America's character disorder. It's the world's fault, not mine!!!
I don't know how many times I was in church earlier in my life and they always talked about how "the world" was evil. It's "the world's" fault. Never do I remember being taught the value of responsibility. (Southern Baptist church)
December 1, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
oskie,
watch Bush speak, if he's babbling tough talk about the terrorists and how he's gonna get them, or when he's doing jingoism he's absolutely fluent. he means what he says.
Then watch when he talks about helping the poor or downtrodden; er.....um......eh..... its like he has a mouthful of marbles; its because he doen's mean what he says.
December 1, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
But then by now we all know Commander CooCoo's neuroses, complexes and lack of conscience, inside out. We've lived through all of them - his Oedipus complex, his insecurity complex, his megalomania, his visions of grandeur and his religious hallucinations.
What a funhouse ride the last 8 years have been.
December 1, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about the joking about looking for WMD's in the oval office? That was funny stuff...
December 1, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush ? Intelligence Failure ? I don't see what's the problem here...
A fucking nitwit.
December 1, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting distinction between "failure of the president" and "failure of the presidency". Bush, the president, is not the failure. The failure is for the administration and those dems and independents who were dumb enough to agree with the intelligence assessments without any deep thinking.
I suppose this allows him to sleep at night.....
December 1, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
...that and a bottle of whiskey.
December 1, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have people really forgotten? Bush was talking invasion and everyone thought it was going to happen in some months, and then the inspectors were coming up empty-handed and Saddam was cooperating. So CooCoo ran his plans up and invaded sooner than he'd been saying and that was why. They were showing that the rationale did not exist. Does he think no one remembers this? I sure as hell do.
I also recall Saddam saying that Bush was going to invade regardless and Saddam was right. But then, he knew these people. He'd worked for us in Egypt before they helped him get control of Iraq.
December 1, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yet not every country or politician was in favor of war.
December 1, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nor was every American and the media was very cute about hiding the fact that there were huge demonstrations against the war all over the country. Just like the media hid the fact that Bush's limo was egged on the way to his inaugural ball. I found that out through Fahrenheit 911.
Something happened two weeks after 911. The media went completely limp and every question about what had happened was dropped down the memory hole and from then on it was propaganda city.
Cheney and Rove did that and I'd love to know how.
December 1, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Cheney and Rove did that and I'd love to know how."
I would too. The failure of the media was (and is) one of the most disturbing parts about all of this. We know that people with power often want more. It's the media (and Congress and the Court)'s job to styime this, and it all went short circuit. This can't ever be allowed to happen again.
Part of this, I believe, goes back to Bill Clinton's allowal of unprecidented media consolidation. I think the blogosphere has helped circumvent this some, but the homogeneous media is a fucking big problem, IMHO.
December 1, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree. As I'm fond of saying, the press is so important in a democracy that in ours it gets the very first amendment to the constitution - a guarantee of freedom.
Look what they did with this gift? The media should be ashamed. They get the freest press on earth and look what we get back for it.
December 1, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Free press for sale. More at 11."
So what are some good steps to reverse this?
December 1, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep a close eye on those FCC appointments.
December 1, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember being startled by the footage of violent demonstrations on Inauguration Day...I thought I had somehow missed it, but that seemed inconceivable, since that's just the kind of news porn I like, and because it seemed like a big story, in its own way. I think the history of lies and manipulation - and the spineless non-response of our cowed media - warrant truth and reconciliation on a South African scale, since that's the calibre of their criminality.
December 1, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Recommend "The Terror Dream" by Susan Faludi for a profound explanation of how we managed to delude ourselves and all get on the loopy bandwagon. (With some notable exceptions...)
December 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember how Bush reveled in the war before it became unpopular? Remember the dinner when he pretended to be looking for WMD and joked about not finding any? Remember the flight suit and the "Mission Accomplisnhed" sign? Remember the rah rah speeches he gave? Remember the journalists who fawmed all over him?
Bush milked this war for all it was worth adn now he regrets bad intelligence.
When Bush says Congress and others saw the same intelligence he did, he's lying, because he hid intel that argued against his plans.
No member of the traditional/MSM should be allowed to interview Bush because none of them will do what's needed.
December 1, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I nominate Bob Somerby for the job. He’s been so hard on other reports for not doing their jobs, I’d really like to see how he would do, given the chance.
December 1, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The very idea that we have to consider the competency of a President, any President, is just unreal.
December 1, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many incompetent leaders did it take to sink Rome?
December 1, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rome wasn't sunk in a day, ya know!
Oh, wait...
December 1, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
The media are the administration's unindicted co-conspirators, so to speak. They know they're culpable. And they won't ask the right questions - they're afraid to. IMO.
December 1, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who was paying attention knows that he expressly wanted to be a 'war president.' He said so in the biography that was released before he even ran, the title of which I can't recall. I do remember the author talking about it - Bush said in that book both that he wanted to be a 'war president' and I believe that is also where the infamous "We need a Pearl Harbor" quote came from.
So your understatement is understating even Bush himself, Greg.
December 1, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will never forget a few days after Sept 11th, hearing a reporter ask Bush something about the attacks, and Bush replying "My administration has found its focus!" in a tone that made it sound like he was pleased as punch! He was practically laughing out loud, and I felt physically sick. I wish I knew who the reporter was so I could track the story down. It was truly chilling.
December 1, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The last 8 years was surreal in a very depressing sense. The celbration of ignorance portrayed by the right may have put an end to them once and for all.
These two links are a funny representation of this subject:
http://www.profitmuhammad.net/kinda.php
http://www.profitmuhammad.net/douche.php
December 1, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spamming t-shirts. WTF?
GET OFF THIS BLOG.
December 1, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
No spamming....I just thought it was funny.
December 1, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, they are funny.
December 1, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
what a crock of crap,he was so hopped up to go to war,the truth could have been right in his face and he would have ignored..whitch he did,tell that to all of the thousands that are dead...
December 1, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I take this as his attempt to start creating a 'story' of innocence around is war mongering.
December 1, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I guess"
December 1, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Notice that Bush will not acknowledge his own culpability- this ethereal "a lot of people" is why I have truly learned to hate him.
I thought for a while that maybe once all the pressure was off and the next president elected, he would finally take some small amount of responsibility for what he did.
He won't.
He is the "I didn't do nothin" frat boy, who is allowed to weasel out of everything, to the bitter end.
December 1, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Blah, blah, blah, blah, mistakes were made."
"Old Blevins" by the Austin Lounge Lizards
December 1, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goddamn those slimy mistakes, sneakin' all over the place and gettin' made!
December 1, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I wish the intelligence had been DIFFERENT"
That's an interesting choice of words there. Not "better" intelligence, but "different" intelligence -- the kind that supported the invasion he wanted.
December 1, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Failure of intelligence? Failure, as opposed to complete fabrication? If he's not the last one to know the truth, then how does Bush's tongue not get tied in knots?
December 1, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
His biggest regret??????????
What about the MILLIONS OF DEAD PEOPLE?!?
Bush deserves no peace, no consideration, no rest, no honor. Never. Not one bit.
December 1, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's going to be a pathetic piece of shit until the day he dies.
December 1, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://3bluedudes.com/george-w-bush/a-retort-to-president-george-w-bush/
Here is my retort. Two things are striking. His refusal to take ANY, not even a little bit, but ANY accountability for everything that has gone wrong, and second, he continues to simply lie.
December 1, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
My biggest regret regarding Mr. Bush's presidency is the president.
December 1, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
He may be the only person on the planet who can convince himself that its a bright sunny and clear day while he's standing in a monsoon.
December 1, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Typical Bush response...blame someone else for his mistakes. There was plenty of good intelligence. The problem was that they cherry picked the intel to support their plan to overthrow Saddam and conquer Iraq, and ignored the contradicting reports. Also, anyone daring to offer or promote contradicting intel was summarily dismissed or marginalized.
December 1, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would someone care to explain why Bush decided to review his record as President in a Charlie Gibson interview? How did he and his handlers think this would be anything other than a PR disaster? Gibson didn't do Sarah Palin any good. Did George think he was smarter?
December 1, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess Uncle Dick never explained to him that part about the intelligence being "fixed around the policy."
December 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, people gotta unnerstan, bein' preznit is hard work.
December 1, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was no intelligence failure...it did exactly what it was written for....start a war.
Biggest regret? no mention of the August '01 CIA briefing? millions dead in Iraq? Faster response to Katrina?
What an ass.
December 1, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It was all about a way to do it.", wrote Paul O'Neill about the goal of deposing Saddam Hussein the early days of the Bush administration before 9/11/01.
Rumsfeld decided on 9/12/01 that Saddam was behind the attacks.
So the Procrustean bed was made for Iraq that would justify what they had decided. The stovepiping began as soon as Bush took the oath.
Bush is sprintin' to the lyin' finish when he says the intel was bad.
December 1, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
No. I'm sure Doofy Donny knew that was a bunch of bullshit just as well as the rest of the Cheney cabal did. He wasn't deluded; he knew he was lying.
I really see Rumsfeld as little more than a sock puppet for Cheney.
December 1, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cynicism;
Bush stuck his neck out for the interview to cover for some new malfeasance.
Mark my words, Bush will be remembered as the most effective Presidency in US history. Everything he set out to do, with the notable exception of Social Security, he accomplished.
His bumbling facade masks an unmatched cunning. May we never see the likes of him again. Someday, an erudite historian will research into who exactly profited from the Bush years. Then compare that research to who contributed to his election. The ratio of profit and power to investment will likely be as precise as Einstein's relativity proofs.
The biggest mistake of the Bush Presidency is that we the people stood by while we were robbed of seven generations of wealth by the most clever criminal since Richard III.
December 1, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
It’s obvious in retrospect that Bush (and the whole administration) was unprepared for war. It’s just to bad that his Daddy complex made him insist on waging one anyway.
Of all the crimes this administration has committed (and there are plenty to pick from), one of the worst was sending our young men and women into combat in an unnecessary war with inadequate personal and vehicular armor.
Not having a plan for after the Iraqi military was defeated is right up there too. The loss of priceless artifacts, though not of the level of letting people get killed, is something that will be forever remembered about Bush.
December 1, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are assuming these were mistakes. I contend that the Bush administration was prepared for the war up to and including its shoddy management. The shoddy management ensured an incomplete chaotic ground scenario, murky fog of war dynamics, and other befuddlement factors which allowed Bush's agenda to flower. Remember Bremer and the missing billions? Remember all of the emergency war funding measures that were rammed through with minimal oversight?
There was a plan... the Bush Plan: destablization. Manufactured instability followed by brazen robbery. There was nothing instituted by Bush that had not been practiced in nations under our imperial sphere of influence.
I know I am beating a dead horse, but the case must be made that Bush is not incompetent. He is fiendishly competent, and the buffoonish act and script was a confidence scheme.
Yes, he is a weak speaker with a middling grasp of English. But can you in all seriousness look at the Bush legacy and not be awed by its sinister shadow of success that practically blots out the sun?
Bush's skill is destroying organizations and walking away unscathed. Everything he touched has turned to ash. This is no accident... it is in fact his qualification. He is the CEO of the United States who has driven the nation to bankruptcy and will walk away with a golden parachute because his SHAREHOLDERS PROFITED from the malfeasance.
December 1, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't give this guy more credit than he deserves. He is hardly cunning or a mastermind. Cheney is cunning. Bush is a twit. I have no doubt that he thought the Presidency was going to be a breeze, and he was going to take the world by storm because he wasn't your typical poindexter politician who did things by the book, like Pops or Jimmy Carter or one of those UN nerds.
There's nothing more to it than that. Bush was in over his head. He couldn't lead because his grasp of issues, policies and processes was shallow. Because there was no one at the helm to communicate the overarching vision, or who had a command of policy, the cunning little maggots who'd infested his administration were allowed free reign.
So all the signs of wanton incompetence really signify just that: wanton incompetence. I mean, really, is there anything at all in his history of business failures that indicates he's anything more than a functional moron?
December 1, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a former member of the military intelligence community, with some understanding of the processes, the people, and the product of intelligence, I have precisely two words and a piece of punctuation for George W. Bush: fuck you!
Sorry, but there is no other way to put it.
December 2, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone with half a brain who has lived any length of time in the Texas hill country can realize what Bush II is and he is surely no 'twit.'
Let's remember the night before the 2000 election. After the final GOP campaign appearance, Bush's plane made an unscheduled stop enroute back to Texas, a very last minute campaign stop in Nashville - his opponent's state, just to say to Gore - "Here's shit in your face, dude."
Bush and his crew KNEW what was going to come down the next day in Florida, courtesy of his brother.
Said brother only yesterday suggested that the Repug party form a "shadow government" in view to neutralizing Obama and thus kicking off his campaign for 2012 and resumption of the Bush dynasty. Arrest the overweight goon for sedition already!
December 2, 2008 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope that he will be called out on this grossly misleading statement about an "intelligence failure." It's been widely documented that the intelligence community did not fail in the sense of being left to do its job and coming up with poor or misleading information. Instead, they were pressured to come up with intelligence that fit Bush's and Cheney's *choice* to go to war. I wish more journalists and politicians had the spine to come out and say so and that Bush and Cheney would actually be held accountable.
December 2, 2008 7:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gibson's rolling over on the hand grenade which Bush coughed up when he stated that Saddam Hussein had refused to allow inspectors in really, really infuriated me. That statement was a complete and utter lie. No shred of truth existed in it. Gibson's refusal to even challenge the statement makes him totally complicit in spreading the propaganda that bad intel was the cause. Gibson has no credibility left whatsoever after seeing how he handled that "interview." What a pathetic husk of a man (take your pick).
December 2, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bush can't help lying. He's a psychopath. He tells the truth only when he thinks it's a lie.
December 2, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink