« Obama Rolls Out Economic Transition Advisers, Include Warren Buffett, Robert Rubin, Robert Reich | Home | County Where Palin Hailed "Real America" Voted Overwhelmingly For Obama »

Georgia Senate Runoff Kicks Into High Gear With New Dem Ad Starring Obama

Democratic Senate candidate Jim Martin isn't wasting any time in jump-starting his campaign for the widely-expected December runoff against GOP incumbent Saxby Chambliss, whose potential defeat would be a huge get for Dems.

Martin is already on TV with a new ad that clearly reveals both his runoff strategy and the challenge he faces: He's looking to re-mobilize the black vote and other Obama supporters who came out in such huge numbers, and thus helped him keep Chambliss under the 50% threshold in a conservative Southern state.

The big question here is whether Martin can successfully remobilize Obama's voters -- note the ad's central emphasis on Obama -- by capitalizing on the Obama honeymoon. Martin could also benefit if Obama's huge win has left conservatives so demoralized that they don't bother coming out next time, thus changing the partisan makeup of the electorate in a state that went 52%-47% for McCain.


35 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

"America is Back" is an interesting slogan...

I think Saxby Chambliss will be able to rally his votes easier with the 60-vote filibuster-proof boogieman.

user-pic

Shorter Chambliss: If you want an ineffectual Senate, Vote Chambliss. Otherwise, stuff might get done.

user-pic

He will be...plus the "Obama effect" that helped Martin won't be near as strong on 2 December...also those that voted for the Libertarian will prefer a "filibusterable" margin.

user-pic

Agreed. Martin has a very tough road.

user-pic

I'll say right now, though. We're taking GA in 2012 :)

user-pic

And Missouri. And TEXAS!

user-pic

Yes. Please. Take Texas. Far. Far. Away.

user-pic

YEEEEAAAAAAAGGGGHHHHH!

Thank you, Howard from Missouri!

user-pic

My best friend lives in GA and his big hope for election night was simply that they could hold Chambliss under 50% and force a run-off. I thought that odd for just the reason that SFCWallace gave above (without Obama on the ballot at the same time, Martin will not likely enjoy that boost that increased black turnout gave him the first go around). My friend's logic, however, was that with the presidential race over, all of the whiz-kids from Obama's campaign (Axelrod, Plouffe, etc) will have nothing better to do than to fly down to GA and help mount the best, damn Senate campaign that Georgia has ever seen. Here's hoping he is right about that, but somehow my instincts still run in the same direction as Jonze's and SFCWallace's.

user-pic

I don't think you can count on the Libertarian voters. They voted Libertarian for a reason. All in all, the electorate in December is going to look very different than the electorate did the other night. Depending on how Martin plays his hand and what resources Obama and the DNC give him, he might have a decent chance at this thing.

We'll have to wait and see.

user-pic

"I think Saxby Chambliss will be able to rally his votes easier with the 60-vote filibuster-proof boogieman."

BUT WHAT IF LIEBERMAN IS OUSTED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS?

OR IF THE DEMOCRATS MAKE IT KNOWN THAT LIEBERMAN WILL BE OUSTED IF MARTIN IS ELECTED?

user-pic

Voting for the Republican Chambliss in an overwhelmingly Democratic government=6 years of ineffectual representation. With a Democrat there Georgia can really have its voice heard, and not just as a protest vote.

user-pic

I'm pretty sure that most of the people who vote for Chambliss won't really care who will be most effectual. They just don't want to vote for a f***ing liberal who wants to take God out of their schools, money out of their wallets and guns out of their hands.

user-pic

Martin needs to emphasize that the best way to make the first black American president's first term successful is sufficient black participation in the runoff to ensure that Saxby Chambliss is not around to obstruct the Obama administration.

user-pic

I might donate a little money here:

http://www.martinforsenate.com/home.html

Does anybody know whether Al Franken has expenses associated with the re-count up in Minnesota? (I'm already on his mailing list; haven't received any new solicitations.)

58 is better than 57. 59 would be better than 58. (And 60 is still not out of the question.)

This is no time to let up and relax. As Obama himself put it, we're at the foot of the mountain now, not the top.

-- ARG

user-pic

I sent him a little $ before the election. I might again once this runoff thing becomes official (his campaign emailed to ask for donations last night).

user-pic

I just received an e-mail from the Franken campaign, indeed asking for more money to help with their re-count expenses. If you are so inclined, you can give money here:

https://secure.alfranken.com/page/contribute/EM2008

Note that the re-count is separate from the general election, just in case you maxed out at $2300 for that. (As if!)

Hmm, Mark Begich could probably use a little more juice now, too: http://www.begich.com/

-- ARG

user-pic

What's this?? A Republican RAISING taxes??? In this economy??? :-)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27577250

user-pic

But without the choice for President at the top of the ticket, will the turn out be more like a primary. In which case it will be driven by supporter enthusiasm and ground game.

user-pic

I'm already calling my friend At Ft. Gordon and Benning!

user-pic
user-pic

ew, bad choice of words, considering.

user-pic

w00t - I just a clip of Bush at the finish of talking about the transition and he was crying!

And I don't feel one bit sorry for him.

In fact, I'm fucking jubilant!

user-pic

Um, what was he crying over??? Fuck yeah I wasn't impeached! Or?

user-pic

Cause it's all over. And Barney bit a Reuter's reporter today - and drew blood. lol

user-pic

Hi Tena, is there a link? Might be worth seeing!

user-pic

Martin should also pick up the pragmatist vote, i.e., those voters who like the idea of their senator sitting with the majority that also happens to own the White House.

user-pic

I live in Atlanta. Martin is a really good guy. A very kind, decent fellow. It will be a battle here. GOTV efforts will be huge. I'm still keyed up from the presidential election- I still have a lot of fight left in me! So y'all come to Atlanta and help out- I'll buy you a beer!

user-pic

I'm pretty sure we can get the vote out. I've been a full time volunteer in New Hampshire for the last month, and four of us from this office alone are planning to head down to work our asses off for Martin. GOTV is going to absolutely key to this election, and if this is the same conversation that's happening in every Obama office across the country, it's hard to see how Martin doesn't have a huge advantage going in. I'll be there on Monday.

user-pic

I just love the fact that they're using Obama in this way -- in fucking Georgia of all places. In the '92 runoff, did Fowler use Clinton like this? Anyone remember?

Anyway, yeah, it may be a longshot, but why not fight for it?

user-pic

I don't think Fowler's campaign was quite like this one. But during the runoff, then President-elect Clinton DID campaign -- in person -- for Fowler. Of course, Clinton actually won Georgia in 1992.

But, as we all know, Coverdell ultimately won the seat.

user-pic

How honest was that election in Georgia? It sounds from what I'm hearing that many voters were purged from the rolls and shunted off into provisional ballots, besides voting on dodgy touch screens.

Can anything be done at this point, besides funding Martin? Maybe some GOTV for those in or close enough to Georgia?

user-pic

I just gave to Martin, via the ActBlue link on DKos.

I was afraid otherwise I might end up like those poor shambling Obamabots in the Onion video, staring listlessly into space, and clicking ceaselessly on change.gov.

Now I've found a new mission. Yes we can elect a Democrat in a Georgia run-off election with low turnout. Yes we can!

user-pic

This was posted here today. Looks pretty fishy to me. Sounds a lot like the situation in Alaska.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jnail/2008/11/ga-vote-fraud---major-issues-i.php

Cameron, you mention the larger registration in Fulton County and the high turnout in 2004. Why are the votes counted so far off that then?

I've created a spreadsheet (attached) from the Secy. Of State's data by county and something in the state's largest county, Fulton, is clearly wrong:

* 2004 - Registration - 446,094
* 2004 - Vote - 336,741
* % 2004 - 75.4%

* 2008 - Registration - 554,682 (+108,592, 24.2% increase)
* 2008 - Vote - 346,223 (+9518, +2.7% increase)
* % 2008 - 62.5% (-12.9%) - 2nd to lowest % in the state

* 2004 Early Vote - 17,603
* 2008 Early Vote - 107,938 (+90,335, +530%)

Simply hitting the same % as 2004 would show 77,000+ votes more and Fulton likely would

have exceeded the state average of 74.9%. Cobb was 79%, Dekalb 77.3%, Chatham 78.4%.

Ten largest counties average is 76.5% which adds another 8644 to the total for an 85,000+ gap.

It is inconceivable that Fulton would underperform the state or the large metro, heavily African American counties so where are the votes?

user-pic

On January 20th he will say these words “I Barack Hussein Obama do solemnly swear …..” and many of us who have worked so hard, hoped so much and even prayed are still in a state of semi-disbelief.
One interesting question that remains is how to properly celebrate this historic event. I for one can finally be happy that I permanently attached his bumper sticker on my car; but what else can we do to show our solidarity with Obama and his movement on that day?
The temptation might be to buy one of the beautiful posters with Obama’s name and face that have been created and, as an artist, I think this makes a lot of sense. But it occurs to me that there may be something too narrow, and shallow about this idea.
How many times did we hear him say that this movement is “Not about me”? And he meant that. I worked hard for him and I deeply trust him but using his face and name as the only symbol of what has happened may in fact point in the wrong direction. Demagoguery is too strong a word but the truth is that, if the only thing we affirm from this is faith in Obama then what is left when he inevitably leaves office? Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we found ourselves drawn to something even deeper than what Obama himself has brought to our lives?
So that’s why I find myself considering what strikes me as an oddly simple but radical gesture, as much as an act of performance art as a way to publically declare my solidarity with Obama.
Here’s what I’m suggesting:
On January 20th, and not before, all of us who believe that Obama’s ascendancy to President is a momentous turning point in history should hang or otherwise display an American Flag in our windows and/or on our bodies as we move through the world.
Now I know that many of you reading this will find it an awkward, if not, distasteful thing to do. That's certainly what I felt when I heard the idea from a friend. Waving the American Flag is usually associated with a nationalistic impulse more appropriate for Right wingers with pickup trucks than we enlightened Progressives.
But consider this: What really made the election of Barack Obama possible? Is it that we Americans are somehow unique human beings from others in the world? Obviously not. We are humans like all others. And yet, what has happened in this election is breathtakingly profound. The competition for wealth and power has fueled wars and conflicts in every part of the world every single day throughout history. And yet what we have just witnessed is that the single greatest concentration of wealth, military and cultural power the world has ever seen has been instantly passed from an entrenched system of political philosophy to one radically different in a completely bloodless and even dignified way. What's more, a man from an historically oppressed minority of this nation will soon be its leader! What made this possible is not that we as individuals are different. What made this possible is that we operate under a political system that requires that this is the way we should behave. It’s the fact that we are citizens of the United States of America that is inspiring envy around the world. Our flag is the most direct and appropriate symbol of this timeless fact.
When I think of it in this way I find myself wondering why I’ve allowed reactionary people to co-opt this symbol as their own as if I was not included. The fact is that the most radical way to deconstruct the meaning of that symbol, to finally cause a revision of its significance and interpretation would be to have us declare that it represents a process and system of government that I, only now, find myself fully able to revere. When I’ve suggested this to some other progressive friends it has been interesting to see how they struggle and then deeply ponder what this could mean for them. It’s like finally taking a close look at what has become an habitual pattern and realizing that there’s an alternative way to function.
But most importantly, this one act, especially if done just when Obama is being sworn in, would be the realization of just what he has been saying to us from the beginning: That we are one people within the United States of America. Moving forward will require us to define what it means to be politically active in a different way than we are accustomed to. Somehow we have to look across familiar barriers and attitudes and behaviors and affirm values that we truly do have in common: democracy and the rule of law as a nation. Despite its troublesome history, this is exactly what the American Flag means and nothing would confuse and disarm Obama’s foes and critics more than if we boldly claim this symbol as rightfully, and finally, belonging to all of us.
So, that’s my proposal. Display the flag on Inauguration Day. If we wait and do in on that day the flowering of this symbolic act across the country will have an unmistakable meaning.
Think about it and do what feels right to you. The most important thing is that Obama will be sworn in as our President on January 20th. I’m not used to waking reality fulfilling such a profound dream but I guess I’ll have to rest of my life to consider what this means.
Thank you,
Chris Johnson

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address