« Virginia House GOPer Loses In Upset | Home | Franken: "This Race Is Too Close To Call" »

Coleman Declares Victory In Minnesota Senate Race, Recount Likely

We may have a recount on our hands in the Minnesota Senate race, though incumbent GOPer Norm Coleman is heading into it with the advantage and has already declared victory.

Coleman leads Al Franken by about 800 votes in the current tally, with all but one precinct reporting. Franken is entitled to an automatic recount under state law, which would be managed by the Democratic secretary of state, and Franken has now said the race is "too close to call" and "we do not yet know who won."

So we may be in for quite a bit of litigation and ballot-counting controversies before this is over.


60 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Stupid Minnesota. This is just unbelievable. Franken is the best man, maybe Coleman will get his ass kicked in a recount.

user-pic

The problem in that race is the independent candidate, who got about 10% of the vote. That worked against Franken, it would seem.

user-pic

Unfortunately, I don't see how you can make up 800 votes in a recount, unless there are absentee and provisional ballots that haven't been counted yet as well.

user-pic

Actually, now 527 votes down. You never know...

user-pic

Et Tu? So can I hold all Californians responsible for everything that passes?

This is just the way it goes. It's going to take about a month before we know if Coleman won it or not. The canvas board certifies the race in about 2 weeks and then the manual recount will start. I believe that absentees and provisionals will be part of that recount so who knows. We're talking about 700 votes out of 2 million cast.

user-pic

I am disgusted with CA today. Really really sad.

user-pic

Frostbite Falls wants a recount.

user-pic

So i wake up and the 3 senate races that was close last night are still showing repugs ahead... wtf, douchebag coleman and convicted felon stevens... how pathetic.

user-pic

What is wrong with Minnesota?

Paul Wellstone must be turning over in his grave!

user-pic

You said it yourself just two minutes later (above). Each GOP incumbent "win" in MN except John Kline ("my" congressman, alas) was largely determined by a strong 3rd party candidate who siphoned off "discontent" votes that would otherwise have gone to the Democrat. Bachmann, Coleman, and even Paulsen only won by pluralities, not majorities. Unfortunately it has been this way in MN ever since the rise of Jesse "The Idiot" Ventura.

We SERIOUSLY need a state (or federal!) constitutional amendment mandating a "top 2" runoff (or "instant runoff") when no candidate wins a strict majority. A majority of the people have voted against Tim Pawlenty and Norm Coleman in every statewide office they have ever pursued.

If I recall correctly, Bachmann has never won a strict majority in her district either. She certainly didn't this time. And this is despite the fact that her district was gerrymandered specifically to guarantee a GOP seat.

user-pic

I agree. We need instant runoffs. Fuck Barkley.

user-pic

I don't know what's going on here. My state sometimes confuses me.

user-pic

Try living in an ultra-conservative neighborhood of CA.

user-pic

Nothing wrong with MN. That was Franken's race to lose.

user-pic

Oh yes there is. Stupid Michelle Bachmann won there.

user-pic

Bachmann only got a PLURALITY in a district specifically gerrymandered to insure a Republican seat. More people voted against her than for her.

I foresee that this will now become a lifelong cause for me.

user-pic

Minnesota and Alaska, WTF?

user-pic

Co-sign. Argh.

user-pic

Yeah no joke, whats with voting for the convicted felon and the soon to be convicted felon.

user-pic

I am now fervently hoping that I filled in my absentee ballot correctly (I am sure I did) and that it hasn't yet been counted...

user-pic

Coleman and Bachmann win in Minnesota. Pffft.

Stevens winning in Alaska is all about giving Palin the spot. I'll eat a bug if she doesn't run for the spot when Stevens if forced out. Alaska is a red State, and they figured why be forced to elect a Dem, when electing Stevens would give them a special election and a new Republican Candidate.

Palin will want into Washington, and becoming Senator will allow her to start building her national resume and be art of all backroom leadership deal-making.

Yes on Prop. 8 is a crying shame as well.

We didn't do really well down ticket and I think the argument that the GOP down ticket candidates were making about "vote for me to counterbalance Obama" made the difference in close races.

user-pic

Well here in NC we owned all the down ticket races.

user-pic

Palin doesn't even have to run--she can pick herself to fill the vacancy.

user-pic

No, she can't. Thanks to Frank Murkowski's nepotism in appointing his daughter to the seat he vacated, Alaskans passed a law requiring a special election to fill vacant seats. However, Palin could appoint herself as designated seat-warmer in the interim, for a maximum of 3 months, until a special election can be held.

user-pic

Would she have to give up her Governor seat to be the seat warmer?

user-pic

Sure, then she will be running as an incumbent(and therefore, no primary to worry about) who has no chance of losing.

user-pic

I don't think she'll have much trouble with getting the Republican nod through a primary, and that way I believe she could remain Governor just incase she loses the senate race. Not sure about that though - can you run for the senate as a sitting Governor?

The issue she may run into is that her ambition is transparent and her challenger could use it against her, because in two years time she'll be busy running for 2012 again.

user-pic

Actually did pretty well down ticket considering 2006 was such a strong Dem wave. It's rare for a big wave like that to be followed by further gains in the next cycle.

user-pic

O.T.: Could someone at TPM please track down this woman and get some post-election comments from her?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeGPzk8Oca8

user-pic

Yes to all the suckage.

But...

Remember, remember, the 4th of November,
The rout of the wingnut lot.
I can see no reason
Why a rout so pleasing
Should ever be forgot.

user-pic

MN SOS is now at 100% reporting with an official lead by Coleman of 726 votes.

user-pic

Recount Purgatory, here we come. My guess? Coleman will still maintain a plurality lead, but will by less than 500 votes in the end.

God damn you to Hell, Dean Barkley. God Damn you to HELL!

user-pic

Second that.

user-pic

The recount could be good for Franken. Officials will now verify and count provisional ballots which could swing the votes to Franken since the most provisional ballots will be from the bigger cities which Franken carried.

I am in TX and knew there was little chance to put a Democrat in the senate so I also gave $$ to Franken knowing he had a good chance of unseating Coleman. I have been watching this race closely!


user-pic

The recount in Minnesota will be an epic battle. There will be blood. I still believe on a Franken victory. Does anybody knows how many provisional ballots are in MN right now?

user-pic

The recount could be good for Franken. Officials will now verify and count provisional ballots which could swing the votes to Franken since the most provisional ballots will be from the bigger cities which Franken carried.

I am in TX and knew there was little chance to put a Democrat in the senate so I also gave $$ to Franken knowing he had a good chance of unseating Coleman. I have been watching this race closely!

user-pic

A certain glimmer of hope in that GOP dirty tricks to supress voters probably lead to more Dem votes not being counted initially. Still a long shot though...

user-pic

Two causes led to this result here in Minnesota:

1) Franken is a flawed candidate. I think he'd make a great senator, but his past left open a remarkable number of avenues for attacks from Coleman.

2) Yet another third party candidate has derailed a statewide race for a Democrat (a DFLer here in MN). In this case it was Barkley taking in over 15% of the votes. Our governor, and short list candidate for veep, Tim Pawlenty, won twice without getting 50% of the vote in either election because of third party candidates. And 10 years ago, laughingstock Jesse Ventura "shocked the world" by winning the gubernatorial election as a third party candidate.

What we really need here is legislation that requires a run-off election for statewide office when no candidate gets over 50% of the vote.

And before everyone gets too down on Minnesota, just remember that we were the only state in the country that had the sense not to go for Reagan in 1984.

user-pic

If Jesse Ventura had run, Franken might won this.

user-pic

Last night, as a friend and I were celebrating Obama's victory, he admitted to me that he had voted for Barkley. He said, "I just really hate Al Franken and I couldn't vote for him." I was completely dumbstruck. Minnesotans are a frikkin' strange breed.

user-pic

Final tally (this is from the Strib website, now showing 100% of precincts reporting) has Coleman's margin down to 600 votes.

And I agree with Mousegirl, that Franken should do well with provisional ballots - don't have the details, but it's a safe bet these are skewed towards first-time voters, and Minnesota had the same Dem edge in new registrations that we've seen elsewhere this year.

But measure this tiny difference against the 463,000 votes cast for a no-hope third candidate! I think the real problem here is that so many Minnesotans (and I speak as a native son) want to be simon-pure in their voting, and have a liking for doomed but noble candidates. Fie on them.

user-pic
But measure this tiny difference against the 463,000 votes cast for a no-hope third candidate! I think the real problem here is that so many Minnesotans (and I speak as a native son) want to be simon-pure in their voting, and have a liking for doomed but noble candidates. Fie on them.

The difference is even dwarfed by the fifth-party candidate who got 8893 votes!

An instant run-off would solve this problem in two ways. One it would help credible third-party candidates, because you could vote for them without the fear of “wasting” your vote, and two, it would allow the candidate preferred by the majority of voters to win.

user-pic

I disagree that Barkley helped Coleman. I think there were lots of weak R's who didn't vote Coleman but who couldn't handle voting for Franken.

user-pic

Barkley was the spoiler. Clearly. Most of my friends are Democrats, and they all voted for Obama. But the majority of them also hated Franken, and held their nose as they voted for him. And at least one of them told me he voted for Barkley. Without Barkley in the race, Franken would have won easily.

user-pic

Franken would serve MN well in the Senate. Stupid to vote for someone third party when your vote is essentially thrown away. It is about the issues, not who you like. MN is losing it.

Alaska is just nuts, I agree, they should not be part of the U.S., and become their own nation. WTF, who votes in a guilty criminal????

user-pic

Minnesota losing it is nothing new. Never forget that my fellow citizens elected a goddamn professional wrestler. And most of my friends continue to insist that Jesse Ventura was a very good Governor. I wouldn't know. I was born and raised here, but I move out of state every chance I get.

user-pic

In all fairness to Minnesota, I've got to believe that Ventura was a better governor than Bush was President.

user-pic

That Jesse the Idiot crossed that lowest of all possible hurdles, I agree with you.

But a governor who demands personal property tax reductions specifically because he personally has lots of ATVs and boats, who gets into "No you di'n't" arguments with callers to an NPR radio program, who uses his celebrity AS GOVERNOR to launch a miserable attempt at a sportscasting career WHILE STILL GOVERNOR, still scrapes the bar on that hurdle as he goes over it.

user-pic

Can you really beat Ronad "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan and AHHHHnold?

Come on, CA takes the cake for insane political choices.

Signed,
4th generation CA

user-pic

All close races that went Republican should be vigorously challenged.

user-pic

Late update. With all precincts reporting Coleman leads Franken by 571 total votes. This is less that 3-hundredths of a percent of all votes cast.

We Minnesotans are in DIRE need of some sort of "strict majority" voting system.

user-pic

Update: I just checked again, and it looks as if new votes are still being counted - the 100% figure shown by the Strib must be rounded up.

So, as the most recent update, Coleman's lead is down to 346 votes. I noticed that one of the few counties still showing less than 100% was up on the Iron Range, where Franken was holding a wide advantage.

Cross your fingers, and it's going to a recount regardless, but Franken can definitely still pull this one out.

user-pic

Where did you see 346? The Strib article I read said 601.

user-pic

It's from the Senate Race graphic, not the headlined story. Expand it, and you get the following results:

Coleman - 1,211,438
Franken - 1,211,092

- I've tried getting official results from the State of Minnesota, but the site won't load; must be overwhelmed.

user-pic

The current Secretary of State totals are actually going the other way right now. Coleman over Franken by 725 total votes (1211625 vs. 1210900).

ARRRRGGGGGGH!

user-pic

Maybe if Norm Coleman and Ted Stevens win, it's not such a bad thing. Stevens will be going to prison within the next few months, and then Coleman will likely follow sometime in the next year or two. Sure, they will both have temporary Republican replacements, but if the Dems can get a lot done over the next 2 years while the Republicans just look like a bunch of corrupt jail birds, we may get even bigger gains in 2010.

user-pic

The current Secretary of State totals are actually going the other way right now. Coleman over Franken by 725 total votes (1211625 vs. 1210900).

ARRRRGGGGGGH!

user-pic

The problem is NOT in the structure of our elections or in our election laws. Third parties have as much right to participate in the process as everyone else. And don't forget that when Ventura won, he BEAT Norm Coleman, which derailed Norm's White House ambitions---yes, Norm from the moment you first met him always gave off the odor of obsessive ambition---he had the Presidency as his goal from the get-go.

And thanks to Jesse Ventura, Norm was knocked to the sidelines from 1998 to 2002. Then what happened? Paul Wellstone probably would have won in 2002. Tragedy struck.

And there is the key. It was the fascist media---the Limbaughs, O'Reillys, Hannitys, and their local counterparts---who lied, distorted, and exploited the memorial service held for Paul and the other crash victims. Parts of the memorial were unwisely turned into expressions of resentment against the vicious attacks on Wellstone, and into a call for people to finish Paul's work by electing his ballot stand-in, Walter Mondale.

The right-wing corporate media monopoly grabbed this and began screaming. Their faux indignation and their outright lies made AL FRANKEN, a friend of the Wellstone family, so mad that he wrote a book, "LIES AND THE LYING LIARS WHO TELL THEM", a heart-felt, searing follow-up to his previous bestseller, "Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot."

Well, with George W. Bush at his side, Norm rode that manufactured indignation to the Senate in 2002.

The real problem is not our election laws, I repeat. Minnesota has had a long tradition of third party politics--usually radical parties. In fact, the Democrats in Minnesota TO THIS DAY are still called the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party to reflect the fact that the party was created by a merger of the Farmer-Labor Party and the Democratic Party in 1944 (at the behest of FDR.)

The real problem is the corporate right-wing media monopoly. We need radio stations to combat the ultra-right talkers who poison the minds of so many Minnesotans (and Americans.) Those professional liars are where the danger and the problem is. They have a captive audience of commuters twice a day, five days a week. There is only ONE progressive radio station in the whole state, and it has a really weak signal.

The cure for the ills of democracy is said to be more democracy, not less democracy. Third parties serve the function of introducing new ideas into the two-party-dominated, winner-take-all electoral arena. Without new ideas, both big parties fight for the center and stagnation sets in.

And the solution to third-party perturbations is always the same---one or both of the big parties steals the platform of the minor party, and thus absorbs their voters.

The vote for Barkley and other Independence Party candidates was a protest vote, and came from erstwhile supporters of both GOP and DFL. The protest was partly against the negative advertising used in the Senate race. Coleman ran the most vicious, lying smear campaign I have seen in my life---and I have been watching Thug smear campaigns since 1962. Joe McCarthy would have been proud of Norm Coleman . . . whose Senate position, by the way, was the same as McCarthy's--chair of the permanent subcommittee on investigations.

But the public doesn't have the perception and political savvy, usually, to detect that one side's ads are far nastier and dishonest than the others. Then additionally, the entire state is dominated by fascist talk-radio, picking up and echoing the Coleman attacks, and you find the second piece of the puzzle---voters' minds being poisoned against Al. He was called a pornographer, repeatedly ad nauseum. His statements on political positions were wrenched more out-of-context than was done to Obama's casual "spread the wealth" remark, if you can imagine that.

Re-writing the laws won't solve the problem. Only getting more articulate liberal voices into the public arena will do it. The internet BEGINS to help. But radio, because of our commuter life-patterns, remains the key. Minnesota's Independence Party attracts voters who are "turned off" by their perceptions of the major parties--it doesn't really have an ideological platform [originally it was part of Ross Perot's campaign.]

Voters for Barkley made statements like "I really hate Al Franken," without knowing why. The why is simply that the right-wing talkers, having been so brilliantly skewered by Al in his books, used their monopoly of the air waves to poison the voters' beliefs.

Finally, give the devil his due, as the saying goes. Norm Coleman is simply the smartest, slickest, most adroit politician to appear in Minnesota since the late Hubert Horatio Humphrey. Norm's soul is corrupt, but he is as talented as they come, in pure political terms. He began as a Democrat--groomed and promoted by some of the state's leading Democrats, who saw his potential. He was Bill Clinton's campaign manager here. He was twice elected Mayor of a Democratic city, St. Paul,--the second time, AFTER he had turned his coat and joined the Republicans.

Al Franken is brilliant, compassionate, and selfless. He'd have been a fitting inheritor to Paul Wellstone's seat. But he didn't set out to be a politician; he went into a line of work--comedy--as unsuitable for a future candidate as, say, professional wrestling. Jesse the Body won for several reasons: He had personal charisma--which Al does not. He had been Mayor of a suburb--Al had no similar credential. And the two major candidates DIDN'T TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY--unlike the case with Al.

Sorry for the lengthy post-mortem. This was a political tragedy. As for Bachmann, her district was always intended for a Republican.

Note-- it looks like Oregon's senatorial phony also squeaked through. Lies and lying liars.

user-pic

Regarding the OR senator race: it's unlikely that Smith won, though it will very likely go into recount. If you look at the county by county numbers, the majority of uncounted ballots are from Multnomah and Lane counties, which tilt heavily D, and include a significant part of the OR population.

user-pic

There's good news here, by the way. Without a doubt, Norm Coleman is one of the most servile, toadying sycophants in Washington, so he'll likely suck up to Obama in order to further his own career. I don't think ol' Norm is going to be much of a problem. He used to be a "Democrat", after all. Look for Coleman to get way out in front on the whole bipartisanship thing. Whatever gets you into office (and keeps you there).

Norm the Towelboy

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address