Will Brokaw Let McCain Change Subject To Ayers?
Senior McCain advisers have flatly declared that they want the subject of the campaign changed from the economic crisis to Barack Obama's past associations and the various things that allegedly make Obama a "risky" choice.
So the question going into tonight's debate is this: Will moderator Tom Brokaw let McCain do this? For that matter, will Brokaw himself ask about former Weatherman William Ayers?
And if the discussion does shift over to Obama's relationship with Ayers -- whether due to Brokaw's questioning or McCain's attacks -- will Brokaw play the association game fairly and ask about the Keating Five scandal?
No one is questioning Brokaw's professionalism or impartiality, but keep in mind that Brokaw has taken on a behind-the-scenes role as a kind of emissary to the McCain campaign for NBC, suggesting he may be sympathetic to the McCain team's claims that McCain has been treated unfairly by the media.
What's more, Brokaw has indicated that he may be less than sympathetic to efforts to recall McCain's role in the Keating Five scandal. He recently agreed with an assessment of the scandal as "ancient history."
One interesting side note: The McCain team would probably prefer that McCain not be the one to bring up Ayers, since that will allow Obama to remind everyone that McCain's own adviser said they were hoping to turn the page past the crisis and get back to explaining why Obama is "risky." That makes the question of whether Brokaw will bring up Ayers more pressing.
We'll be blogging the debate right here at Election Central.
Late Update: John Aravosis makes the key point that the suggestion yesterday by McCain's lawyer that McCain did nothing wrong amid Keating Five might make questions about his role newly relevant.















Who the hell knows what Brokaw will do -
thanks for getting this thing working again. I hate to say a thing - I don't want to jinx it [looks nervously from side to side]
October 7, 2008 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who's the "no one" who aren't questioning Brokaw's impartiality? He's a known militarist shill and jock sniffer (see his buttlicking ode to the people who gave you Joe McCarthy, "The Greatest Generation").
I don't know what his politics are, but he's completely in the tank for the War Hero red herring.
October 7, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem for McCain is that Ayers only works when Obama isn't there to respond. McCain can make a slimy scare ad using Ayers but if Obama gets a chance to respond it is game over.
NATO forces had been chasing that Bosnian war criminal round for eight years, nobody in the hippie health movement knew he was a war criminal. If republicans think its easy to spot a terrorist they are completely missing the problem.
McCain had a terrorist fundraiser speak at his convention - Rudy Giuliani used to collect cash for the IRA.
Obama should want Brokaw to raise Ayers, he can swat that one down easy. But McCain certainly does not want to be asked on Keating.
October 7, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pat Buchanan laid it out perfectly, if McCain brings up Ayers, Obama should own that he knows he made some bad associations but turn it on McCain and nail him for associating with Charles Keating.
That will completely neutralize that attack from Mccain.
October 7, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Terrorist trumps greedy financier.
People expect bankers to be greedy.
People expect terrorists to spread terror.
Making money is the American dream.
Bombing America is Al Queda's dream.
October 7, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not when the Economy is the central issue facing our country.
Dow Jones down 500pts today.
October 7, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding.
The economy is way more terrifying than Osama bin Laden.
October 7, 2008 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Palin's association with anti-American groups is more immediate, more recent, and occurred when she was an adult AND had a chance to have an impact.
October 7, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
But the Bankers are the Terrorist!
October 7, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. It doesn't matter how bad the economy is. That's why Obama should should stick with pointing out the patent absurdity of the whole thing - that he was a boy of eight living thousands of miles away when Ayers did these things.
October 7, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't Brokaw get to select the questions that come in by email and who to call on from the audience? he smells of bias and is in the McShame camp to "even" coverage. Really can't stand Brokaw...
October 7, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have never been able to figure out how Brokaw got to be a network anchor in the first place. He always sounds like his mouth is full of marbles.
October 7, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
What evidence is there that Obama is not risky?
He has almost no tack record. Changes position frequently. Has a history of questionable association. Was a virtual unknown on the national stage before this campaign.
Regardless of how intelligent he is, how well he speaks or how good a 3-point jump shot he has, Obama is a high risk gamble.
October 7, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Regardless of how intelligent he is, how well he speaks or how good a 3-point jump shot he has, Obama is a high risk gamble"
Fucking your mother without a condom is a high risk gamble.
October 7, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, that was a bit much..lol
October 7, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like you are speaking from experience there, Humanity Critic.
October 7, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
No comment. lol
October 7, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well see, when you tack, you do change positions frequently.
It would help if you wouldn't make typos while you copy that fucking talking point that I've seen about 150 times now.
October 7, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Touché.
I actually authored that and didn't copy it from anywhere. It is just that many reasonable people have that opinion.
October 7, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I fully expect you, in the interest of intellectual honesty, to admit that the choice of Palin by a 72 year old is risky.
October 7, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not really an "opinion," though, is it? It's an assertion of (putative) fact. And it's wrong.
As to this "virtual unknown" nonsense: We know plenty about Obama. In fact it's hard to imagine how we could possibly know much more about anyone. You maybe choose to support him or to oppose him, but don't play this game of Fear the Scary Alien Negro Who Might Be a Secret Muslim! It's disingenuous, to put it kindly.
"Changes position frequently"? Come now. You do know who he's running against, right? Can you name a single position -- just one, any one -- that McCain has held consistently for longer than the past several months? Haven't you seen any of those McCain vs. McCain mashups, where he is shown taking (at least) two contradictory positions on a wide range of subjects, often denying that he ever said things that he just clearly said? Very amusing.
I'll let the 3-point thing slide. Obviously a Scary Negro can play some basketball.
October 7, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah I've noticed that, since Obama is ahead in virtually every state.
I guess that makes you one of a handful of "reasonable people."
October 7, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your coming to a left leaning blog with posters who are political junkies and know what is going on. If you going to come here and span stuff like "He has almost no tack record. Changes position frequently. Has a history of questionable association. Was a virtual unknown on the national stage before this campaign." Then back it up.
He has almost no track record? Iam pretty sure that a lot of people here knows Obama's life story by now and he has plenty of track record and its one of the reasons why so many people support him.
Changes positions frequently? Name them... i know we could list off tons of McCain flip flops on just about everything.
Has a history of questionable association? You got what 3 people? Ayers - he shared a charity board with to promote education... watch out he just might be the boogy man. Rezko - he might of at worse gotten himself in a situation where someone could of used leverage on him. However there hasn't been any real proof that it ever occurred. Wright - he said some over the top stuff but Wright is a respectable person who was talking about the US foreign policy, and how we shouldn't blindly praise everything our country does. McCain on the other hand has much worse connections to various people, so don't even get us started.
"Was a virtual unknown on the national stage before this campaign"
Well before his speech in 2004 that is true... but Who the F cares? He has been in the national spotlight for over a year now and has proven himself over and over again. A lot of former presidents were not known nationaly before they started to run for president.
So don't come in here expecting people to take you seriously when all your doing is spamming stupid talking points that we have all heard 10000 times and are complete junk.
October 7, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not interested in your opinion or analysis. What I would be interested in is beating your punk arse into the dirt.
October 7, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans gave us 9/11, 2 failed wars and a bunker buster to the heart of our retirement security and you think Obama is risky?
October 7, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look everyone! The repulsive little racist snot from a previous thread is back! Hey jerkoff: guess what? The Secret Service is investigating the jackass who made the "Kill him" shout. Still think Obama supporters are just like Tawana Bradley?
October 7, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw will likely be as neutral and objective as all the other moderators. He's a professional. Of course, each side will claim he favored the other.
October 7, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
October 7, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I do agree with this. I think Tom Brokaw is too Old School and too professional to let his personal feelings intrude here.
To put this in a more partisan way: Unlike the GOP campaign, Brokaw does have a sense of the historic weight of this kind of thing. He won't be winking and dog-whistling tonight.
October 7, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
You'd think so but remember George Stephanopolous/Charlie Gibson's debacle as moderators for the Clinton/Obama debate?
October 7, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw that and I just loved it, too.
October 7, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think fogu is back everybody!
October 7, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's funny, I thought McCain was a Gambling enthusiast, or "addict" if you will.
So, by your logic, if Obama is that much of a "risk" McCain should love the guy!
October 7, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
And McCain is playing a game of high stakes poker and only holding a pair of deuces.
October 7, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he wants to win the election, he's gonna have to bluff his way there.
October 7, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has many arrows in his quill...
October 7, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw won't bring up Ayers. He'll have one of the town hall questioners do it. (He does, after all, get to pick which questions get asked.)
October 7, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw got cowed by the McCain campaign during the conventions. And my guess is that he'll bring up Ayers, because I also guess that Ayers' actions deeply offend Brokaw's midwestern sensibilities. He would never have those attitudes or those feelings, so that makes Ayers just so wrong in Brokaw's mind (total guesswork here, obviously).
Brokaw wrote "The Greatest Generation". Ayers was a dirty fucking hippie, trying to blow up the US. Yes, Brokaw will bring up Ayers.
October 7, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Walter Cronkite was one of my favorite "hippies". Brokaw missed the "greatest generation" of journalists.
October 7, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he does, he should also bring up the Keating 5. I bet he won't. He loves McCain per his comments during the Democratic Convention about McCain being a POW.
October 7, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we have to assume Brokaw's selected questions will be as bad as the infamous flag pin ABC debate. I just hope Barack can stay calm, not take the bait, and pivot back to the real issues (while pointing out the far more salient Keating 5). He might also quickly allude to the fact that Republicans who served on the same educational charity in Chicago have stated the notion that Ayers was a dangerous type at the time Obama knew him, is just plain silly.
October 7, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point re: Republicans on the board.
October 7, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not making any bets on the press any more.
I'm just waiting to see what happens.
Everyone told me Katie would let the Princess get away with murder, too.
October 7, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, I wish I could reach the state of zen master like you, lol.
I'm nervous to death, honestly....
October 7, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I was a total mess last week before Princess Sparkle Starburst and Biden were debating.
I've watched Obama and Biden walk off with two debates now. After awhile - and this close to the election with polls (which I do hate, but) this good-
I'm just tuning in hoping for a fatal crash.
October 7, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw is a mediocrity with a tiny, tiny mind. Of course he doesn't think Keating is relevant, and of course he'll bring up the Ayers smear. My guess is he's even capable of taking Obama to task if Keating comes up--even as he puts Ayers in play.
October 7, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't really care for this kind of ad hominem bashing of working journalists. I think it's fair game to call people on specific cases of bad performance. But I really think we should leave the Hate-the-Press rhetoric to Republicans.
Look at how artfully the much-maligned Katie Couric skewered Sarah Palin.
October 7, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that he may, for whatever motivation, suprise us. But so far, his track record is pretty dismal. Time, as they say, will tell.
October 7, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for being reasonable.
There are two blanket complaints that people on the left use over and over to address almost any situation and that's: the press is in the tank for the right and Americans are too stupid to get it.
Neither of these cliches fit the current situation. This isn't 2004.
October 7, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know where this reverence for the "working press" --whatever the hell that menas comes from. You've been asleep for eight years or more if you think these talking heads are performing the duties of an actual press.
October 7, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gamble? I think McCain is the "Gamble" candidate, in more ways than one.
His health, rather than his craps jones, is the most urgent in my book. And then of course, there's the fact that this guy has been dishonest with his wives, dishonest with Charles Keating and the country. He chose for his highly possible successor a nasty, petty, stupid fool.
I'll take my chances with Obama. I think the odds are far better in my favor with him.
October 7, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Town Hall audience will include a lot of Independents. They are the only voters in play.
Republicans are with McCain, and Democrats are with Obama.
The biggest mistake that Senator Obama would make is to get into a mudslinging contest, instead of addressing the economic crisis, and how it is affecting the lives of every day people. It is the Independents, stupid.
If McCain brings up Ayers, Senator Obama should just reply: John, that is a lot of false nonsense, and you know that it is, now, I am going to address the economics needs of the working class people of America,...............
Always speak to the voters concerns, and never to your opponents agenda.
It is the Independants, stupid?
October 7, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you honestly think Obama would do that?
I don't see it - it's not him.
All he's said is he'll fight back if he's punched - he won't just take it and nor should he.
October 7, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It better be him, or he will be playing into McCain's hands, by letting McCain set the tone of the debate.
The thing about getting down in the gutter with your opponent is: the viewers only see two equally filth covered brawlers.
October 7, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
You managed to read me backwards, liam.
I am saying I don't think Obama would get in the gutter and you seem to think that I'm saying he will.
October 7, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Tena,
I wrote what I think Obama should say and do, and you wrote: do you think he will do that, and that you did not see him doing it. How else was I supposed to interpret you response?
October 7, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, liam - my bad.
October 7, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is the possibility of making the jab while pivoting to higher ground. I think Obama can pull it off, only because he won't be trying to hit a home run, but merely getting onto first base. McCain, on the other, in his attempt to reach the bleachers will flail aimlessly for a big strike three. Enough baseball metaphor, I think so.
October 7, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign.
October 7, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point! Make McCain look like the distraction every time he strays away from the topic under discussion.
October 7, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I got two words to Mr. Brokaw: Try it.
Don't complain later if what's left of your credibility goes down and crash into the ground.
These are difficult times, Mr. Brokaw and the people wants proposals, not smears.
October 7, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speak for yourself, Greg. I question both.
October 7, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Second'd. He will bring Ayers and I won't be surprised if he brings Wright too.
October 7, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm questioning both, actually.
October 7, 2008 7:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, gosh darn it, McCain is closest we got to the Greatest Generation that has ever lived in entire time of the whole universe.
October 7, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
+1
October 7, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have lost a lot of respect for Tom Brokaw due to his water-carrying for the McCain campaign vis-a-vis NBC. It pissed me off when they replaced Keith and Chris with milquetoast David Gregory, who is a little too friendly with the conservative panelists. He's almost Bush-like in his use of pet names, which is sickening.
I was very surprised to see Brokaw named as a moderator. With the events of the past couple of months I just don't see him as unbiased anymore.
October 7, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Ayers and Keating might cancel each other out. I think the electorate will see this and get back to whats going on right now.
I hope...
October 7, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Originally the moderator of the Townhall wasn't able to ask follow-up questions when the extensive rules of the debate were agreed to. However since Brkaw wasn't party to those discussions he has decided that he will ignore them and will ask follow-up questions.
I have no doubt that Brokaw will be biased as hell, as this his his buddy McCain's last chance. I expect foreign affairs questions and softball domestic affairs questions for McCain while Obama will be asked questions that warrant technical explanations or nuance in the hopes Obama gets lost in the answer.
McCain is a cornered animal, so he's going to be dangerous tonight and he'll have a tag team partner in Brokaw - Obama really be prepared for every and anything.
October 7, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
My devil's advocate is to remember how everyone went off on Gibson before that interview. Media people do weird things when they know the world is watching.
October 7, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw has no credibility in my mind. If they wanted a right-wing moderator, they should have picked Brit Hume, who at least is honest about his affiliation.
I'm frankly stunned that they chose him.
October 7, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was surprised, too. But I don't remember when the choice was made. If it was after Russert's death, well, maybe NBC didn't have anyone else.
I was never enamored of Brokaw when he was anchor. If I watched network news, I watched Peter Jennings, who was the best of a decidely mediocre and milquetoast lot.
October 7, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Brokaw asks about his association with Ayers, too bad he can't respond asking Brokaw about his association with Joe McCarthy. (Murrow he ain't.)
October 7, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but I don't think many but those on the hard right will truly believe that line of bull.
If they do, and associations matter, shouldn't it be more significant that Governor Palin's husband belonged to a party that has as it's chief goal secession from the US? Wouldn't marriage trump sitting on an educational board?
Or does McCain sitting on a council of Anti-Semites beat Obama sitting on an educational council with Ayers?
Guilt by association can get really tough.
October 7, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Brokow will allow it.
The Keating Five is old news. McCain said he was sorry. I mean, really, he said he was sorry. The same type of sorry when he left his poor first wife.
I think that's what McCain's Campaign theme should be: John McCain: He's Sorry.
October 7, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw may allow it, but Americans don't want to hear about it. Obama needs to place the terrorism and his association with Ayers clearly in the past and pivot to the future. If old man Brokaw and old man McCain want to talk about the past, let them frame themselves there. That's not where Americans want to be tonight.
October 7, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
he may want to throw the far right some red meat--just to show that he's not biased.
I hope he calls McCain out regrading one of McCain's advisors saying that there campaign loses when the talk turns to the economy.
I agree, this election season the theme shoud be:
It's the issues, stupid
October 7, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
their not there! damn me.
October 7, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
The other consideration: Brokaw, if he thinks Obama has the inside track, doesn't want to burn his bridges, and, thus, get to watch Brian Williams and Katie "she rocks" Couric have 1:1 chats while he is left out in the cold.
October 7, 2008 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
See this is my thinking, but I catch hell for that kind of thinking, so I'm glad you said it.
October 7, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
They can give us both hell, but we'll give them the truth and they'll think it's hell. Or something like that.
October 7, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not so much: Brokaw has been suggesting that he's going to retire for good after this election. He has respiratory problems, maybe emphysema.
October 7, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, tellmemore, I hadn't been paying attention when the Obama campaign was bragging about his 3-point jump shot. That's a very important skill, and thinking about him playing basketball, I realized I had never noticed that he's not your average Harvard Law grad turned senator, Obama has African ancestry! That explains everything, doesn't it?
October 7, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw is not impartial, he's with the old men.
He's made his lack of respect for Obama evident a number of times...with it's issue based, or, the fact that he resents his youth.
He'll do his best to slant for McCain whatever questions he asks.
October 7, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw is not impartial, he's with the old men.
He's made his lack of respect for Obama evident a number of times...whether it's issue based, or, the fact that he resents his youth.
He'll do his best to slant for McCain whatever questions he asks.
October 7, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this news? Seems like it to me. If tenuous relationships to bad people determines the outcome of presidential elections, McCain is in a ton of trouble...
http://www.annistonstar.com/breaking/2008/as-localupdate-1006-jflemingcol-8j06o5456.htm
October 7, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
IOIYR
October 7, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not any more, dammit.
October 7, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
IOIYR?
October 7, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
IOKIYAR - It's ok if you are Republican
It's the press double standard that I keep arguing has fallen down and can't get up.
October 7, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah gotcha. Well, i'm a little surprised this hasn't even made in onto Huffpo yet. I mean, this IS what qualifies as Campaign News according to the MSM, right? McCain's craptacular judgement.
October 7, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey ill be glad if its gone but I don't see it, other then Maddow and Keith.
October 7, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama is asked about Ayers it will come from a undecided town hall questioner so Obama can't say "typical McCain distraction/smear that Americans don't care about" because it will be seen as attacking the questioner so he will have to answer the question. That might not be a bad thing to get it out of the way - he'll have two minutes to answer, so he could both answer the question and parry into McCain's camp saying they wanted to turn the page on the Economy and that they want to distract the voters with ridiculous smears because as a staffer admitted, if they keep talking about the economy McCain is going to lose.
I mean Ayers isn't hard to explain away - I was eight years old when Ayers was active in the WU, I have denounced his past violent ways and John McCain knows as much. When I met Ayers he was a professor of education at a Chicago College, and we worked together (along with many others, republicans, democrats and independents) on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge(a Republican funded cause no less).
Kos has a good blog on Ayers/Obama where a Republican was on NPR defending the smear as silly. - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/7/131120/885/357/622049
October 7, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its BS that its coming from "undecided town hall questioner", Tom has a endless amounts of questions to pick from so he really is the one giving the questions and is just hiding behind another person.
October 7, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, but Brokaw will not be asking the question, it will be Joe Citizen. So Obama can't brush it off saying "America isn't interested in this stuff" because at least one American is.
HuffPo is saying that 6 million questions were emailed - so basically any question that Brokaw wanted to ask will have a citizen posed question that he can choose.
October 7, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know that is how its going to work, what iam saying is that its bullshit. The question maybe coming from the mouth of another person but Tom is the one who picked the question. We will know if Tom has any integrity or not, if a question about Wright,Ayers,Rezko,keating comes up then we will know.
October 7, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some debate predictions.
1. McCain will be more soft-spoken than his red-meat supporters (including Ms. Palin) want. He's got to temper his desire to "take the gloves off" with a need to not look like just an angry old man. He will try to raise questions like "What kind of man is Barack Obama" in a quiet, reasonable way. Hey, I'm not attacking! Just asking!
2. This won't work too well. His contempt for Obama will be palpable.
3. Brokaw will do better than everybody here expects. I'm not absolving him of all his sins, but I've been watching him for decades now, and the man is a professional with a sense of history.
4. Tonight's drinking game should not include "My friends." Enough is enough. I'd suggest one shot for "trust" and one beer chaser for "the American people."
5. Barack will be Barack. Which is to say, he'll lay back and act calm and minimize the fisticuffs. Many supporters will complain about his passivity.
6. McCain will land a couple of well-prepared shots. The audience meter will go down when he does, but his crowd will love it.
7. Snap polls will give Obama the win, but not by a knockout.
October 7, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know about the crowd. It is possible that the majority will take this seriously, and not as "hey, I got tickets to Letterman." In which case, pre-planned zingers and the like will get the collective groan of disapproval.
So the question is, will the majority of the be filled with "We want solutions to this freaking mess goddamnit" or "Entertain me."
October 7, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just plugged in the TV...saw Tons of Democrats, few R's...hmmm
October 7, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's funny, I thought McCain was a Gambling enthusiast, or "addict" if you will.
So, by your logic, if Obama is that much of a "risk" McCain should love the guy!
October 7, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
And as I've posted before, the audience, most of whom will have submited their questions that they deem important enough to be asked, will most likely not remain silent if a "Ayres" or "flagpin" question is asked. If I asked something serious and relevant, like, I don't know, "what are going to do about health care," and Brokaw calls on someone asking a question about Ayres, I'd let my utter dissatisfaction known.
October 7, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama will throw the kitchen sink at - both of them. mccain for being clueless with dozens of ties to corrupt lobbyists and Brokaw for being biased, out of touch, and going off from the message the American people want to hear - The Economy.
Maybe he could even throw in the news that Ebay is cutting 10% of its workforce (Meg Whitman's company). It's stock has dropped 46% this year. More not so great econ advice given to mccain, this time from clueless Whitman.
October 7, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
When consumers have no confidence, they quit buying.
That's almost fatal in this economy.
October 7, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re Brokaw: No. Attacking the moderator is not classy and will backfire. Obama is classy.
October 7, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Katie Couric skewered Palin? Hunter S. Thompson would have skewered Palin. Katie just turned on the stove and let Sarah step in and burn herself. And she gave her burn ointment. Hunter would have left her, flesh in flames, as Shit Slinging Sarah deserves.
Watch Brokaw tonight. Think about Walter Cronkite, Ed Murrow, my beloved Dr. Thompson. The Fourth Estate has gone the way of houses in North Minneapolis. Abandoned, dilapidated, condemned.
Maybe the foundation is still there, though. Katie's performance is a big improvement over her pathetic blatherings in 2004, when she actually gave credence to the Swift Boaters.
Still, if I do think about all that while watching Brokaw, my head will explode. Better go find my helmet...
October 7, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
O stop
!
Yes for Katie Couric she did and when was Hunter ever on national TV?
Jesus - Couric never let Palin get away with a nonanswer. For Couric, she was relentless.
Couric deserves mad props for that series of interviews - are you kidding? If someone had ripped Sarah's throat out while growling, America would not have gotten it like they did from Katie - the woman is dumb and Katie showed us that.
Goddamn liberals whine nonstop.
October 7, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Tena for sticking up for Katie! She surprised quite a few of us with her ability to subtle get Palin to open up only to discover there was nothing inside worth looking at.
October 7, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just flat think she was awesome - she dissected that woman so delicately, with her big ass katie smile.
It was beautiful - she knew what she was doing and she was enjoying the hell out of it and she did us all a solid!
October 7, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if Nash McCracken or whatever the hell her name was will make another appearance. The "I'm not questioning your patriotism, but where's your flag pin?" lady?
October 7, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Debates are about presentation, the content is mostly generalization. On the first TV debate, Kennedy vs. Nixon, the majority of television watchers thought Kennedy had won, while radio listeners overwhelmingly thought Nixon had won. It really is about image.
Last time, McCain's strategy was to make Obama look illegimate by not acknowledging him and saying 'you're wrong.' Obama's strategy was to look presidential and 'post-politics' by saying 'john's right' frequently.
Any Ayers / Keating mentions will be shot down by news commentators right after the debate, disregarding those with political leanings. Brokaw won't even allow it; his reputation is on the line as much or even more so than the candidates'.
October 7, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I recently had the flag tatooed on my ass. Maybe I can get her to kiss the flag. You know, to prove her patriotism?!?
October 7, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is Bushe's let's go shopping Speech?
That's what he should say.
lol
October 7, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whining? Damn! I was going for "seething with violent rage." Clearly I have to work on my delivery.
October 7, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe, if you weren't so crabby. :P
October 7, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can go with seething with violent rage.
That fits.
;)
October 7, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dislike Brokaw, his fawning to power and in particular his looking back on my parent's generation with a worship no one who was raised by them could have, but I don't think he's stupid enough to be overtly biased. I'd say we'll get the lean, the nuance and the innuendo for McCain, but I don't know if that's enough to make a poor McCain performance into a good one. And I expect McCain's performance will be poor, especially in contrast to Barack's calm and reasoned focus. He's too angry and too frustrated to speak well with his hated opponent standing in the same room with him.
October 7, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's really very true in many ways and McLame's demeanor in the last debate just killed him - nobody missed it that he wouldn't look at Obama.
October 7, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if he'll over do the opposite tonight, almost stare down Obama and give that creepy "That's not change we can believe in" phony smile co combat the narrative forming that he's an angry old man.
October 7, 2008 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is a certain joy in watching Palin stump in NC (cnn.com) at this point in the election. She ain't in PA, OH, MI, WI, MN, etc. She does want to make me puke, so it is not really joy.
October 7, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the fact they play some some sickening song "she's not just a pretty face" at the end of her speeches really makes me wretch.
October 7, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, Hunter was a journalist. So the only people he reached were the now endangered species: people who read.
October 7, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, really?
LOL!
Hunter didn't reach a national audience anything like Katie Couric's. Hunter's audience isn't voting for McLame anyway.
:)
October 7, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, Hunter was a journalist. So the only people he reached were the now endangered species: people who read.
October 7, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whining? Damn! I was going for "seething with violent rage." Clearly, I gotta work on my delivery.
October 7, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
And your delivery of posts is a bit repetitive.
October 7, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama can very tactfully handle Brokaw. Obama's so mentally sharp and Brokaw just wants to go back to fishing for trout.
October 7, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw has about a month or so with NBC. He's a center right retiree, Yes, he may not want to be infamous for being partial on the last debate he will be conducting, but his selection of questions will not be immune from his ideological stance, which will help McCain a bit.
That's sad for us.
I am sure if there will be questions about Ayers/Keating 5, but there will questions about negative turn of the campaign. And Obama will hammer on McCain for "turning a page on economy," "taking gloves off," "cannot win on economy," etc. And McCain's answer: I asked him for 10 town hall meetings; American people deserve to know "who is the real Obama?"
Someone in the audience, an implanted one, will scream: "Treason, Terrorist." That's the plan they rehearsed earlier in the rallies.
If this happens, this will backfire so badly. Obama will earn more independents.
October 7, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I meant there won't be questions specifically about Ayers or Keating 5.
October 7, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ayers is going to be in the mix.
CNN and Mark Halprin (sp?) are reporting that Obama knew Ayers better than he's let on.
Didn't Walter Annenberg appoint Ayers? I mean Mr. Annenberg was certainly not a lover of the Weather Underground. So, Obama worked with Ayers--we know that. And where, rationally, do you move ahead with that? That Obama was associated with Walter Annenberg?
This would be funny, but the cons are just getting their fear-smears warmed up.
October 7, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
And for most Americans, this goes over their head Whoooooshhhhhh!!!
October 7, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am never one to underestimate the power of fear in a campaign.
However, pocketbook fear may finally trump the fake fear the cons love to peddle! Here's to Hope!
October 7, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hardly think Walter Annenberg was a leftist - this is silly.
October 7, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was being silly on purpose because one could just as easily tie, using right wing logic, Walter Annenberg to Bill Ayers. It's the non-logic logic that the far right love to apply to anything and everything.
October 7, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"CNN and Mark Halprin (sp?) are reporting that Obama knew Ayers better than he's let on."
That is simply CNN and Halperin regurgitating a desperate Republican talking point. It's sad they are still shilling for the Repubs. The fact is that the Ayers connection has been fully vetted by the Chicago press.
October 7, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, that is false on both counts. And the reasonable, smart people are clearly going with Obama. On January 20th, our eight-year long national nightmare will...be...over! Deal with it.
October 7, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
HANNITY IS THAT YOU?
October 7, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
the best analogy i've seen so far is this:
mccain served in the senate, on the same side of the aisle, as larry craig. i'm guessing he also had LOTS of conversations with him, may have sat on the same committee(s) as craig, and likely either lobbied craig for votes and/or had craig lobby him for votes.
does that make mccain closeted homosexual who goes looking for action in public bathrooms?
(of course, given the keating 5 thing, analogies like this are really superfluous, but still ...)
October 7, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/fear-and-loathing-in-town-hall.html
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Fear and Loathing in the Town Hall: A Predictive Fantasy
(The camera looks at the hall from above, into the hall, from the POV of the stage. Red meat has been hung from the walls and rafters, along with dollar bills which, upon closer inspection, are Monopoly money.
The crowd is seated. They are strangely quiet. Their manner is that between those who are waiting for their instructions, post-op surgical recoverees, and post-war survivors. They are slightly slumped, in the same posture.
The candidates enter from opposite sides of the rear of the stage and walk to their podiums. The crowd rises as one and cheers with a loud, aggressive fervor reflective of their desperation.
Obama is standing tall in stride, looking a bit overcome by the experience, although genuine. McCain is smiling--his cheerful public grimace, although there is some genuine pleasure. His eyes have the slightest glaze of a gradually oncoming fog.)
MODERATOR: Tonight is a different format--one where you, the public, can ask your questions directly to the candidates. None of the questions have been screened in advance, and the candidates have been given no advance notice of what the questions, or who the questioners, might be. And with that, we begin. Our first question:
CITIZEN 1: My name is Jan, I'm from Murfreesboro? I've been watching the news, and I'm scared. I can't say that I've listened much about the stock market before? But I know that it's going down, and that's bad. I don't know what's going to happen to my job, or my house, or my kids. My question is for Mr. McCain? What will you do to help us understand what is going on, and to make it clear just what you will do about it?
(Crowd applauds vigorously as Jan sits down with a bit of embarrassment).
MCCAIN: (Holding the top of the rostrum with both hands and smiling): Well, first, I want to welcome each of you here tonight. You know, I know what each of you are feeling. I think that each of you must be scared--as I am, of not verifying myself in my father's and my grandfather's eyes. But, that's not so important today--or, at least saying it isn't. What is most important is to appear that I understand an economy that just months ago I said that I had little understanding of at all. I want to win. I need it, frankly, as a way of overcoming my own personal horrors and demons, of overcoming the anger that was bestowed and thrust, unwillingly, upon me. And that's why I'm still willing, even as the sharpest edges of mental function fade, to propel myself through this mass of insult. I understand how to respond to insult. With anger. And impulse. And that's what I'll bring to the White House, come January of 2009.
(Crowd applauds vigorously)
MODERATOR: The next question is for Senator Obama.
CITIZEN 2: Thanks. My name is Ross, from Shreveport. First-time caller, long-time listener. My question is: Senator Obama, it's not an error that you were given the middle name "Barack". We know that that is the same name of the murderous. Communist leader of Iran--and that's no accident. (A slight murmur from the crowd. The moderator looks vaguely stunned, but does not interrupt). Now, when you were going to Russia, with Bill Ayers, and dodging the draft--just like William Jefferson Clinton--(speaking more quickly now, more aggressively, turning to the crowd)--why weren't you here at home, saving our banks from the Liberals and the Socialists who want to take our money away from us and just give it to the terrorists?
SARAH PALIN: (Poking her head out from the wings, with a big smile): You betcha'!
(She withdraws).
OBAMA: Well. First of all, I also want to welcome you all here tonight. You know, I know that this is a difficult time. Many of you are worried about your jobs, your families, your homes. There are times that test a man's soul, and every woman's as well. And I know that this may be one of those times. I can understand why you would be frightened, even angry at what this nation has done. But we are a nation that has risen up in adversity even in the best of times, we found our strength, and honor, and courage, our ability to work as one, when faced with the most difficult situations. And I want to call on each of you, in that spirit of patriotic sacrifice, to join with me in that effort in the days ahead.
(Silence. Then applause, as the recognition of actual thought begins to spread through the crowd. It swells, and finally, subsides).
MODERATOR: The next question is for Senator McCain.
CITIZEN 3 (He is a man who appears to be in his early 40's wearing blue jeans that are stiff and obviously brand-new. They are perfectly creased. He is wearing a tight fitting, also obviously new T-Shirt that says "Average American...And Black With Rage!" beneath which is an American flag. He is wearing black wing-tip shoes. ). Senator McCain, I'm just an average American, just an average Joe, just your Average Joe-Sixpack (Blackberry begins ringing)...Oh...
excuse me...just...a...sec...my boss's phone...(whispering tensely into phone:) "No...I said sell. Sell. Yes, the entire portfolio. No, not Ghanan timber, for god's sake, gold, the lot of it. Jesus H....(tucks Blackberry back into pants pocket and then readjusts his stance to that of average Joe, slumping to one side again and changing his voice back to it's original tenor). Like I said, just an average Joe Sixpack. And I'm wonderin'. I heard what Mr. Hussein just said about "rising up", and I'm wonderin' if that's exactly what he wants to do! Oh, sure, he wants us to band together to rise up--where have we heard that before? Socialists! That's what they do! (crowd begins to murmur, and in the rising heat, the smell of the fresh meat begins to waft faintly through the hall). Rise up! That's what he wants to do! Well, we need to rise up! Against those kind of Socialist, Communist, Fascist, Atheist, Marxist policies! (the crowd is talking, some nodding their heads). And so what I want to ask you, Sen. McCain (crowd quiets), as an average everyday American, is this: What is it like, being a fighter pilot and all, when you know that Barack Hussein was out there, palling around with his Communist friends?
MCCAIN: Well, my friend--and by that, I mean that all of you are my friends--I'm glad you asked. Not everyone has had the luxury of gaining an education merely on the basis of their own talent, or the opportunity to travel the world learning how to be separate from important family members without their having significant pull, or to be able to experience the variety of foods that one has the chance to consume when they are paid for by the State. And, I can say that, in that way, I haven't been quiet as lucky. But I will say this--I will not look such fortune in the face and say: 'Fine, I'll work on education with the Bill Ayers of this world', "I'll be at the top of my class at Harvard", when I can be down, down there with you at the bottom! I know what it's like to be at the bottom when I've had all the opportunities--and I want to share that experience with those of you who have had none. You're angry. I'm angry. We have that in common. Let's be angry together, satisfied that, for another for four years, we've put those who have the arrogance to think for extended periods in their place, content in knowing that we're right--even if we're wrong.
CITIZEN 4: Hiya. My name is George, from Midland, altho' some would say Kennebunkport, heh, heh. I have a question for ya, John, and it's this. Listen: I'm goin' to be out of a job soon. Oil futures aren't lookin' that good, and I've got to tell ya', I didn't have too much luck there in the first place. So I'd like to ask ya, one flyin' man to another--what do you think I oughta do?
PALIN: (emerges from wings with purposeful strides to McCain's podium): I've got to take this one, John. Mr. Bush, if you can't figure out what you want to do after you leave and we move in, take a little time off, and then you come right up to Alaska. They love hunting just like you--and you can fly, you can learn to do it from a plane! The pipeline's big enough for any number of mistakes. So you come up here when you're finished--we've got plenty of bars with plenty of bowls of nuts and plenty of televisions right on Wasilla Main street--we'll take care of you right!
(Bush smiles and sits, crowd applauds, Palin, smiling and waving, exits).
CITIZEN 5: Well, look. This is a serious question. I'm John, from Carpenter. It's for both of you. I've got two kids, 4 and 6, a boy and a girl--so sweet. You know. My wife, she was working for the WaMu branch, center of town. It's closing next week. She's been looking in the ads, the newspapers, online--nothing. It's all she can do to keep a smile on her face for the kids. Myself, I built a commerical trucking business from the ground up. Sixteen years. Sweat everyday, grease on my hands, I can never get it out. We were never rich, but I made a good living. I didn't know about investing--who does, you're not born with it! Anyway, I went to an investment advisor, it seemed like the safe thing to do, protect the kids, plan for the future, not use my own dumb head (smiles). Well, he was so smart, and he was so sure, and he had it all planned out. And it looked so impressive on paper. Now--all of a sudden--it's gone. Everything is changing. It's changing so quickly. It seems like nobody--nobody knew. Not even the people who were supposed to! Everybody was talkin', makin noise, thinkin' of one thing: Themselves, themselves, themselves. Never worrying to think about someone else, about the future, about the next moment.
Well, now the next moment is here. And I wanna know--what are the two of you really gonna do about it?
(The room is quiet as his last word echoes in the hall. The raw meat is rocking, slowly in the air, and the paper bills are gently fluttering). You can see Palin in profile, standing in the wings, holding her chin in her hand. The two candidates stare straight ahead, holding the podium. They are silent).
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/fear-and-loathing-in-town-hall.html
October 7, 2008 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw has been very disappointing... He's fully in the tank for McSame.
I don't expect much from Tom tonight...
October 7, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
please please please learn your history and get it right. The Keating Five you all speak about
was Alan Cranston Democrat
Dennis Deconcini Democrat
John Glenn Democrat
Donald W. Riegle Democrat and
Senator John Mccain was the only one cleared. Please keep bringing it up Once again it was the Democrats
October 7, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink