« Election Central Morning Roundup | Home | Palin Attacks Obama Over Wright -- Even Though McCain Said Wright Was Off Limits »

Palin Keeps Up Attack On Ayers, Obama's Patriotism

Sarah Palin continues attacking Obama's character and patriotism and raising William Ayers in Clearwater, Florida, this morning, though today she adds a new layer of dishonesty to the attack, taking a previous quote from an Obama adviser out of context to assert that Obama has lied about his closeness to the former Weatherman.

From the prepared remarks:

Barack Obama said Ayers was just someone in the neighborhood. But that's less than truthful. His own top advisor said they were, quote, "certainly friendly." In fact, Obama held one of the first meetings of his political career in Bill Ayers's home. And they've worked together on various projects in Chicago.

These are the same guys who think "patriotism" is paying higher taxes. (Remember what his running mate Joe Biden said!) This is not a man who sees America as you and I do -- as the greatest force for good in the world. This is someone who sees America as "imperfect enough" to work with a former domestic terrorist who targeted his own country.

The "certainly friendly" line is a reference to this interview with top Obama strategist David Axelrod. In it, he said:

"Bill Ayers lives in his neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school," he said. "They're certainly friendly, they know each other, as anyone whose kids go to school together."

Palin left out the qualifier, obviously. Separately, Palin's use of Ayers to question Obama's patriotism makes it perfectly legitimate to point out that Palin repeatedly courted a secessionist group founded by someone who openly professed his hatred for the American government and cursed our "damn flag." And Palin's husband was a member of the group for years.

More Palin excerpts after the jump.

Evidently, there's been a lot of interest in what I read lately. Well, I was reading my copy of The New York Times the other day, and I was really interested to read about Barack's friends from Chicago.

Turns out, one of his earliest supporters is a man named Bill Ayers. And according to The New York Times, he was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that, quote, "launched a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol."

Wow. And there's even more to the story. Barack Obama said Ayers was just someone in the neighborhood. But that's less than truthful. His own top advisor said they were, quote, "certainly friendly." In fact, Obama held one of the first meetings of his political career in Bill Ayers's home. And they've worked together on various projects in Chicago.

These are the same guys who think "patriotism" is paying higher taxes. (Remember what his running mate Joe Biden said!) This is not a man who sees America as you and I do -- as the greatest force for good in the world. This is someone who sees America as "imperfect enough" to work with a former domestic terrorist who targeted his own country.

This, ladies and gentlemen, has nothing to do with the kind of change anyone can believe in -- not my kids and not your kids. What we believe in is what Ronald Reagan believed in! That America is "a shining city on a hill for all mankind to see" that America is a good and honorable nation, and that the virtues of freedom are worth fighting for! The only man who can take on Washington is John McCain.



175 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

While the Obama camp SHOULD point out those things about Palin, for the first time ever I really actually think the argument that McCain is trying to distract from the financial crisis is actually pretty powerful.

http://strategy08.wordpress.com

user-pic

You are absolutely correct... Go after the economy, economy, economy with a touch of the Keating 5 and the Alaska Independent Party!

Obama and the dems need to go after that sick 'Yenta' Sarah Palin. Go after husband Todd and the Kids.

No.

SP is a joke, and is treated by anyone outside of the Rep/fundie base as such. The dems and Obama shouldn't dignify her comments (except to maybe mention that she's lying again), she hasn't earned a place at the grownups table.

Leave her and her husband to the tabloids and blogs, and leave her kids alone. They've got enough trouble on their hands, considering who they've got for parents.

I agree. It definitely seems like this is how the campaign is playing it. Besides, way more damning is that she is the subject of an ongoing legislative investigation. Still, that is a topic for surrogates and hopefully (though not likely) for the MSM to explore. Obama needs to stay focused on the economy and the issues. If he does that, he will "win" the town hall debate, which notoriously dislike slanderous character attacks.

I mostly agree that Palin and family only deserve public attention on the cover of the National Enquire. That's where America's trailer trash get their printed news; their televised news is off Fox. Keep her corralled in just a few venues that are Palin-friendly and her message doesn't go far.

But when she ventures outside of her ring of viciousness, then hammer her. Hold her up to the same standards as everyone else. If she fails to quote a source or mangles a quote from a source, show her the same amount of mercy given to Biden for forgetting once to credit a source he had used many times before.

Being treated equal is not sexist. It's part of the reasonable expectations one must endure in public life. That includes taking hard knocks. So far, Palin hasn't taken any.

Who said anything about sexism? I think going after Palin is just bad strategy. She should be treated as the fringe extremist and unqualified candidate that she is. Talking about her family or what not just makes her the subject of the news cycle, not the economy. That is precisely what the McCain camp wants, which is one reason why they have her saying this crap. Going after her is a distraction, and thankfully everyone seems to know it.

She should not be held to the same standards as Biden, but instead to the same standards as Hannity: "What else do you expect from a lying, extremist, fear mongerer?" Why dignify their temper tantrum by going after them?

The focus should be on McCain. He has plenty of bad associations and dirty skeletons to keep everybody busy for the next 30 days. Think of it as: we have more significant fish to fry than this insignificant liar and hate mongerer.

I agree that the campaign should stay away from attacking Palin. However, there's nothing wrong with unofficial surrogates in the media going after her.

Well, that's what I said in my post above. But I think "going after her" is too strong of a way to put it. There's no need to dig things up on her or her family. Just point out that she is the subject of a legislative investigation. She's refusing to show up for her subpoena a la Karl Rove style, because she apparently thinks she's above the law.

Going after her family will only further enable her relentless victim whining. While I don't think it will be effective in terms of wooing voters, it will keep the MSM busy on that story, rather than the real ones: the economy and health care.

I think the fact that her husband was involved in a secessionist group is relevant. I'm sorry, I do. The minute Palin brought up Ayers it put it on the table.

palin's own connections to the alaskan secessionists are real enough that going after 'todd' directly is best left for the msm.

The msm? As opposed to who? I'm not in any way suggesting that the Obama campaign do it.

actually there's nothing wrong with biden going after her. she's the VP candidate, he's the VP candidate. but he should do it dismissively and move quickly to discussing the top of the ticket. have a quick glass houses and stones line about her connections to an alaskan secessionist group. don't let the mccain campaign's smears change the subject, but acknowledge them and move on to what the american people want to hear about.

I just don't see what good this does. Who will it convince? It just makes it look like they have to resort to the same tactics McCain does.

This seems especially illogical, to me, since she is currently the subject of an ethics investigation and refuses to show up for her own subpoena--even after agreeing to cooperate with the investigation. I just think there is enough stuff directly about her political actions, that there's no reason to bring up the AIP.

This to me is like Keating 5--it is relevant to how she will handle her job. The AIP stuff smacks of Ayers to me because it brings up the same objections: do you have any proof that she supports secession? Do you really think she will help Alaska secede as the VP? I can't honestly believe that you do.

Let's stay focused on the egomaniacal, above-the-law way that she runs her government.

user-pic

You know, the one constant since Palin was announced has been reams of comments about how we can't attack her.

It's bullshit.

The point of bring up the AIP is not to destroy her with it....it's to blunt their arguments in regards to Ayers.

OK, but you still haven't answered how this will work or who it will convince. Why won't it just seem like tit-for-tat politics as usual, and enable Palin to keep it up? How would it result in anything else? How will it not just put Palin in the media spotlight, rather than get them back to the economy, which is the issue Obama is clearly, overwhelmingly winning on?

Teena, I'm not saying we "can't" attack her. That's silly. I'm asking what good bringing up the AIP will actually do. Especially in light of the current investigation that she's thwarting. Why not bring that up instead? That stuff, to me, isn't attacking, like this Ayers garbage is, it's bringing up relative political and public activity, like Keating 5.

Just what I said...it will blunt the attacks on Ayers. If Palin believes that Obama should be held responsible for Ayers crimes, then shouldn't Palin be held responsible for the anti-American ravings of political party that she associated with? Do you think she wants to answer to that? If she wants to talk about Wright...fine...then let her answer for her own crazy pastor who believes that Jews should be converted and homosexuality can be prayed away. This isn't rocket science.

But who on earth will make her answer to that? She has no more debates, won't take questions from the press, and is only doing interviews with Hannity and Kristol from here on it. So, yes, Biden could bring it up. But what would that actually do to make her stop? Do you think her rabid base that attends these rallies is going to boo her for talking about Ayers? Or Kristol will ask her hard-hitting questions about the AIP, because Biden brings it up?

Sarah Palin:

The product of the adulterous affair between Spiro Agnew and G. W. Bush?

or a lying, cynical bitch?

Thanks Greg for reminding all about Palin and her hubby's literally un-American activities. People need to know more about these people's pro-treason agenda.

They sent out Sarah Palin to attach Obama for having a pastor who said some off-the-wall shit? Are you effing kidding me?

It's like they're so desperate to change the subject from the economy that they're willing to pick a fight over whether attending churches featuring an actual witchhunter and end times theology that's so insane that even her exceptionally loony denomination condemned it as heresy is within the mainstream.

Attack, not attach. (So are we going to see those cool new editing tools anytime before the election, guys?)

hey dontp[ balmenthe tools just causuy you can't typoe!

user-pic

"(So are we going to see those cool new editing tools anytime before the election, guys?)"
The only true non-partisan issue out there!

Most of us are nice enough to realize what the intended word was and read past without giving it a second thought. As if no one else has very done it.
No harm intended, no harm done.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Barack Obama attracting 52% of the vote while John McCain earns 44%. This is the highest level of support ever recorded for Obama and is his largest lead of the year.

I love the smell of Mccain desparation in the morning

This is not bad at all for polling that contains mostly weekend data.

You got it all wrong. You should say:

I just love the smell of a napalmed campaign waifing in the cool morning air

I love this quote from the Rasmussen poll analysis as well: "It is worth noting that Obama’s lead is now bigger than any lead enjoyed at any point by either candidate in Election 2004."

Let Wassherman Schultz or HRC play the AIP card

user-pic

It's a decent attempt at making headlines.

Unfortunately for the Palin/McCain ticket, today's economic news will leave them below the fold.

There seems to me an even more nastiness to this since Biden is off the campaign trail as his family deals with the passing of Jill's mother, and thus is not out there to respond.

I worry that Biden is just too collegial-friendly with McCain -- not to mention too much a natural gentleman -- to do attack dog politics. Sister Palin has it in her blood. She loves every nasty lie that comes out of her mouth.

I disagree re: Biden. I bet you dimes to donuts he will attack McCain.

I doubt he can get anywhere near the level of "pal of terrorists". Which is a good thing, don't get me wrong. Still, his rhetoric has to be much sharper, more pointed. "Gambler", "temperamentally unsuited", "erratic", and "chameleon" are some of the "bites" that come to mind. He's got to get attention in the MSM. Look at how much air time Palin is getting for her "pal of terrorists" jibes alone. Biden can't be prefacing his remarks with "John McCan is a friend of mine..." He has to go at him and not let up. IMHO

I hear ya. I agree re: sharpening attacks and the language used to do it.

I think part of it also is that the debate is over. There is no longer the threat of being called out on the bs. She can say whatever she wants because they aren't going to let her do any more interviews and she won't have to answer to it. In fact, I think this is something the Obama campaign should say every chance they get - "It's easy to make wild claims when you won't ever go in front of the media and have to answer to it."

Yes, but interestingly, she doesn't seem to realize that she could very well be ruining her long-term career. It is clear that she is thoroughly ambitious, which is the only reason she took this gig, rather than having the smarts to stay away from what looked like it would be a losing endeavor and would risk her coming out "too early."

If people's impressions of her end up being that she is a racist fear mongerer who can only play to the base, which it looks more and more like it will be, I think her future in the Republican party is in jeopardy. Assuming they lose in 2008, not only will she be damaged goods, but so will McCain's campaign strategy, which will clearly be remembered as intensely negative campaigning. Huckabee has successfully appealed to the base, while appearing to be rational and ethical. He will seem a much safer and smarter bet in 2012, and will likely crush Palin even with her base support group.

I honestly thought she was politically savvy enough to use this campaign for her own benefit no matter what: help them win and get to be VP and a credible presidential candidate; if they lose, present herself as a capable rising star in order to make herself a viable candidate in '12. She's letting herself be used, and given the likelihood of their ship sinking, it seems like a fairly dumb decision.

Nope too bleeding shabby and Ras usually has a republican slant. I sense tomorrow's debate is going to get nasty. Mccain has little choice but to toss out as much mud as he can. Obama just needs to stay calm and focused on message, economy, economy and some health care.

As long as the MSM allows her to conduct hate speech rallies and no be challenged for the accuracy of what she says, we have to endure. There has to be a public backlash in order to send a message to her what she's saying is out of line. Unfortunately, the people at her rallies are enthralled with her and what she says. McCain has succeeded is scaring the MSM in to line. They report about the rally, who was there, what was said and leave it at that. As if the content of the speech has been vetted and filtered for accuracy before hand and the MSM need not analyze otherwise the message will be muddled with irrelevant facts.

Decent my pale white a**. It is a shameless attempt to play shiny object with the MSM. Mccain's camapign has become bitter, chaotic and nasty. Ity truly is silly season when the economy is still looking like a revealed Narc at a biker rally and Ms Lipstick is playing puerile your guilt by assoc is worse than his games.

I remember James Carville once saying something that certainly applies here: "Remember, when a skunk is cornered, *that's* when it sprays." Indeed.

user-pic

Take a look at the economy in the rest of the world this morning - and they're talking about a 60s radical.

That's relevant to bouncing banks in Europe -

Completely agree. We're looking at a possible global collapse. And these losers want to talk about a culture war. They couldn't be more detached.

http://pufferfish.typepad.com/

user-pic

The economy is scaring me to death.

Me too. Check out James Kunstler's blog. Scary stuff.

http://jameshowardkunstler.typepad.com/

user-pic

No, they're talking about the current Democratic nominee for President and his relationship to an unrepentant 60's radical who was part of a terrorist organization, and how the nominee has lied about the relationship.

user-pic

Wallace - I was a 60s radical.

I don't give a shit.

Nobody else does, either. That was 40 years ago and it's meaningless.

It has nothing to do with anything that is an issue right now. Nothing.

Yeah, me too. I'm scratching my head trying to remember it all, but I'm too riveted to the present economic freakout and this epochal campaign to be taking walks down memory lane. To hell with that crap. I'm expecting a notice any day now from my pension fund informing me that haven't sufficient liquidity to do any more payouts. I'll be royally screwed. Still, I plan one more $200 donation this month before hitting the road or moving into Hooverville. Jesus this is weird!

So what? I haven't heard McCain denounce Liddy...a "friend" that admitted he planned to assasinate a journalist deemed "unfriendly" to Nixon.

user-pic

LOL - Wallace comes out of hiding for this? Your boy is way down in the polls, his VP pick is the butt of late night jokes, the economy is faltering and the best McCain can do is to try to rehash long debunked nonsense? Good luck with that as I'm sure it won't make McCain look beyond desperate. :eyeroll:

My how the mighty have fallen. Not you SFC Wallace. You are the last person I would think would parrot this bullshit. Are you saying Obama is a terrorist? Of course not. Are you saying that because of his work on a non-profit board he sympathizes with Ayers' late 60's activities and positions? That would be laughable.

This is why the Republican Party is a dying party. The intellectual dishonesty is so rampant it is collapsing from the weight of its own ignorance. Palin is the future of your party and it is a very dim future indeed.

Oh lawd.

Those '60s radicals sure aint what they used to be- fundraisers for their children's schools? What sell outs...

user-pic

'Alas - we all got older and became what we were radicalling against.

It just happens.

Funny that the State Bar of Texas had no problem admitting me and the Illinois State Bar had no problem admitting Obama and I guess y'all don't know, but you can't get a license if you've been in serious trouble -