« Obama: Why Won't McCain Bring Up Ayers To My Face? | Home | TPM Track Composite: Obama's Lead Expands In First Post-Debate Polls »

Obama To Hit McCain For "Erratic And Uncertain Leadership"

In a speech today in Ohio, Barack Obama will seize on John McCain's change in his housing plan to launch a direct hit on McCain's temperament and fitness to lead, in what's looking increasingly like a concerted effort to unnerve McCain in advance of the final debate.

According to the prepared remarks, Obama will hit McCain for making an overnight change to his homeowner bailout scheme that would make it better for financial institutions and worse for taxpayers:

Now, this is just the latest in a series of shifting positions that Senator McCain has taken on this issue. His first response to this crisis in March was that homeowners shouldn't get any help at all. Then, a few weeks ago, he put out a plan that basically ignored homeowners. And now, in the course of 12 hours, he's ended up with a plan that punishes taxpayers, rewards banks, and won't solve our housing crisis.

Well, I don't think we can afford that kind of erratic and uncertain leadership in these uncertain times. We need steady leadership in the White House. We need a President we can trust in times of crisis. And that's the kind of President I intend to be.

This comes after the Obama campaign released a new ad this morning questioning McCain's judgment amid crisis.

Now Obama is personally questioning whether McCain's temperament renders him unfit to lead, and contrasting it unabashedly with his own leadership abilities. I'm not sure if Obama himself has done this quite so directly before. Temperature steadily rising...

Full Obama remarks after the jump.

We meet today at a moment of great uncertainty for America. In recent weeks, we've seen a growing financial crisis that's threatening not only banks and businesses, but your economic security, as well. It's getting harder and harder to get a loan for that new car or that startup-business or that college you've dreamed of attending. And if you've invested your life savings in the stock market, you've probably watched a good chunk of it disappear.

It's a crisis that's been years in the making - the result of greed and irresponsibility that stretched from Wall Street to Washington. And the truth is, it will take more than a few days to repair the damage. Yesterday, the Fed took another unprecedented step to cut rates together with nations around the world, and those nations will soon be gathering in Washington to deal with this crisis. The next President will have to manage this recovery. The question is, will that President be looking out for you?

Senator McCain and I had a chance to talk about this the other night in Nashville. Some of you may have seen it. In that debate, he offered what he said was a new idea to help deal with the financial crisis, and that was to have the government - meaning taxpayers - buy up bad mortgages in America.

Well, the idea wasn't particularly new. The authority for the Secretary of Treasury to buy and renegotiate bad mortgages is part of the financial rescue plan we just passed. In fact, I proposed it myself because, if it's properly done and limited in scope, such buybacks can be one tool to help innocent homeowners stay in their homes on terms they can afford.

But I also said at the time that this should not be a vehicle to reward banks and lending institutions that recklessly wrote bad loans. It should not be a bailout for the high-rolling real estate speculators who took those loans to make a quick buck.

We have to act to fix our broken economy and restore the credit markets. But taxpayers shouldn't be asked to pick up the tab for the very folks who helped create this crisis.

And that's the problem with Senator McCain's risky idea. On Tuesday night, his campaign said that he would ask the banks to absorb some of the cost by selling the bad mortgages to the government at a discount. Then, by Wednesday morning, he'd changed his mind and was proposing to bail out banks and lenders with taxpayer money.

Senator McCain actually wants the government to pay the full face value of mortgages on the books, even though they're not worth that much anymore. It's a plan that would guarantee that American taxpayers lose by handing over $300 billion to underwrite the kind of greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street that got us into this mess.

But it's not just that the McCain bailout rewards irresponsible lenders, it's that his bailout would make it more likely that those lenders keep up their bad behavior. Just yesterday, Countrywide, one of the nation's largest lenders, reached an agreement to help homeowners refinance their mortgages. Under Senator McCain's plan, lenders like Countrywide wouldn't have any incentive to come forward and help homeowners - because they could just wait for the government to bail them out.

Now, this is just the latest in a series of shifting positions that Senator McCain has taken on this issue. His first response to this crisis in March was that homeowners shouldn't get any help at all. Then, a few weeks ago, he put out a plan that basically ignored homeowners. And now, in the course of 12 hours, he's ended up with a plan that punishes taxpayers, rewards banks, and won't solve our housing crisis.

Well, I don't think we can afford that kind of erratic and uncertain leadership in these uncertain times. We need steady leadership in the White House. We need a President we can trust in times of crisis. And that's the kind of President I intend to be.

Make no mistake: we must do more to help innocent homebuyers. I've worked on a series of proposals over the past two years to do that. And I support the Treasury's efforts to buy up troubled mortgages. But we need to do it in a responsible way. That means making sure that we're not overpaying for these mortgages and rewarding the very lenders whose recklessness helped cause this crisis. It means giving taxpayers a share of the benefit when our housing market recovers. And it means doing what I proposed more than two years ago and cracking down on predatory lenders by treating mortgage fraud like the crime that it is.

We also have to make sure that if the Treasury moves forward with its plan to put more money into struggling banks, taxpayers will be able to get their money back and the CEOs who contributed to this crisis won't get rich as a result. And those AIG executives who went on vacation with taxpayer dollars? They should return to Washington with a check for the taxpayers and be fired on the spot.

Now, there are other steps we can take to help homeowners that won't cost taxpayers a dime. One thing we can do is change our bankruptcy laws so they help ordinary folks. Right now, the law lets bankruptcy judges write down your mortgage if you own six or seven homes, but not if you have only one. That might help Senator McCain sleep easier at night, but it won't do anything for people like you. That's why if I'm President, and you're like most people and own only one home, I'll make sure those judges can write down your mortgage too.

So I know these are difficult times - for Ohio and for America. But I believe we can steer ourselves out of this crisis - not just because I have confidence in the plan I'm proposing or the leadership I'm offering, but because I believe in you. Because I believe in this country. Because this is the United States of America. This is a nation that has faced down war and depression; great challenges and great threats. And at each and every moment, we have risen to meet these challenges - not as Democrats, not as Republicans, but as Americans. With resolve. With courage. With that fundamental belief that here in America, our destiny is not written for us, but by us. That's who we are, and that's the country we need to be right now.

America still has the most talented, most productive workers of any country on Earth who work two jobs or three jobs and take the last bus home at night because they want something more for their children. We're still the home to innovation and technology, colleges and universities that are the envy of the world. Some of the biggest ideas in history have come from our small businesses and our research facilities. It won't be easy, but there's no reason we can't make this century another American century. Of course we can.

But I also know this. It will take a new direction. It will take new leadership in Washington. It will take a real change in the policies and politics of the last eight years. And that's why the decision you make in twenty-six days is so important. That's why this is no ordinary election - because this is no ordinary moment for America.

And yet, even as we face the most serious economic crisis of our time; even as so many Americans are worried about keeping their jobs or paying their bills or staying in their homes, Senator McCain's campaign announced last week that they plan to "turn the page" on the discussion about our economy and spend the final weeks of this election attacking me instead. His campaign actually said, and I quote, "if we keep talking about the economy, we're going to lose."

Well I've got news for John McCain. This isn't about losing a campaign - this is about Americans who are losing their jobs, and their homes, and their life savings. I can take four more weeks of John McCain's attacks, but America can't take four more years of John McCain's George Bush policies. We can't afford four more years of the economic theory that says we should give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. We can't afford more four years of John McCain's call for less regulation so that no one in Washington is watching anyone on Wall Street. We've seen where that's led us and we're not going back.

It is time to turn the page on eight years of economic policies that put Wall Street before Main Street but ended up hurting both. We need policies that grow our economy from the bottom-up, so that every American, everywhere has the chance to get ahead. Not just corporate CEOs, but their secretaries too. Not just the person who owns the factory, but the men and women who work on its floor. Because if we've learned anything from this economic crisis, it's that we're all connected; we're all in this together; and we will rise or fall as one nation - as one people.

The rescue plan that passed Congress last week isn't the end of what we'll do to strengthen this economy, it's only the beginning. Now we need to pass a rescue plan for the middle-class that will provide every family immediate relief to cope with rising food and gas prices, save one million jobs by rebuilding our schools and roads, and help states and cities avoid budget cuts and tax increases. And we should extend expiring unemployment benefits to those Americans who've lost their jobs and can't find new ones. I've been fighting for this plan for months. My opponent has said nothing. And that is the choice in this election.

You've heard a lot about taxes in this campaign. Well, here's the truth - John McCain and I are both offering tax cuts. The difference is, he wants to give the average Fortune 500 CEO a $700,000 tax cut but nothing at all to over 100 million Americans.

I'll give a middle-class tax cut to 95% of all workers. And if you make less than $250,000 a year, you won't see your taxes increase one single dime - not your payroll taxes, not your income taxes, not your capital gains taxes - nothing. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.

My opponent wants to give $200 million in tax cuts to the biggest corporations in America. I will eliminate capital gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.

John McCain wants to give tax breaks to the corporations that ship our jobs overseas. If I am President, I will end those tax breaks and give them to companies that create good jobs in the United States of America. That is the choice in this election.

Senator McCain's first reaction to this economic crisis was to say that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong." Well, I don't know about you, but where I come from, there's nothing more fundamental than a job - not just because it's a source of income, but because it's a source of self-respect. And if we want to turn this economy around and lead the world in the 21st century, we have to create the high-wage jobs of tomorrow right here in America.

If I am President, I will finally fix our broken health care system. My opponent talks about giving every family a tax credit to buy health care, but what he doesn't mention is that he'll also tax your benefits for the first time in history. It's an old Washington bait and switch. He gives you a tax credit with one hand, but raises your taxes with the other.

He thinks we won't notice. Well, I've got news for John McCain: we notice, we know better, and we're not going to let him get away with it.

This issue is personal for me. My mother died of ovarian cancer at the age of 53, and I'll never forget how she spent the final months of her life lying in a hospital bed, fighting with her insurance company because they claimed that her cancer was a pre-existing condition and didn't want to pay for treatment. If I am President, I will make sure those insurance companies can never do that again.

My health care plan will make sure insurance companies can't discriminate against those who are sick and need care most. If you have health insurance, the only thing that will change under my plan is the amount you pay in premiums. That will be less. And if you don't have health insurance, you'll be able to get the same kind of health insurance that Members of Congress get for themselves. We'll invest in preventative care and new technology to finally lower the cost of health care for families, businesses, and the entire economy. That's the change we need, and that's the choice in this election.

If I am President, I will invest $15 billion a year in renewable sources of energy to create five million new, green jobs over the next decade - jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced; jobs building solar panels and wind turbines and fuel-efficient cars; jobs that will help us end our dependence on oil from Middle East dictators.

I'll also put two million more Americans to work rebuilding our crumbling roads, schools, and bridges - because it is time to build an American infrastructure for the 21st century.

And we'll give every child, everywhere the skills and the knowledge they need to compete with any worker, anywhere in the world. I will not allow countries to out-teach us today so they can out-compete us tomorrow. It is time to provide every American with a world-class education. That means investing in early childhood education. That means recruiting an army of new teachers, and paying them better, and giving them more support in exchange for higher standards and more accountability. And it means making a deal with every American who has the drive and the will but not the money to go to college: if you commit to serving your country after you graduate, we will make sure you can afford your tuition. You invest in America, America will invest in you, and together, we will move this country forward.

Finally, I will take on the corruption in Washington and on Wall Street to make sure a crisis like this can never, ever happen again. I'll put in place the common-sense regulations and rules of the road I've been calling for since March - rules that will keep our market free, fair, and honest; rules that will restore accountability and responsibility in our corporate boardrooms.

And just as we demand accountability on Wall Street, I will also demand it in Washington. That's why I'm not going to stand here and simply tell you what I'm going to spend, I'm going to tell you how we're going to save when I am President.

I'll do what you do in your own family budgets and make sure we're spending money wisely. I will go through the entire federal budget, page by page, line by line, and eliminate programs that don't work and aren't needed. We'll start by ending a war in Iraq that's costing $10 billion a month while the Iraqi government sits on a billion dollar surplus. And we'll save billions more by cutting waste, improving management, and strengthening oversight.

These are the changes and reforms we need. A new era of responsibility and accountability on Wall Street and in Washington. Common-sense regulations to prevent a crisis like this from ever happening again. Investments in the technology and innovation that will restore prosperity and lead to new jobs and a new economy for the 21st century. Bottom-up growth that gives every American a fair shot at the American dream.

I won't pretend this will be easy or come without cost. We will all need to sacrifice and we will all need to pull our weight because now more than ever, we are all in this together. What this crisis has taught us is that at the end of the day, there is no real separation between Main Street and Wall Street. There is only the road we're traveling on as Americans - and we will rise or fall on that journey as one nation; as one people.

This country and the dream it represents are being tested in a way that we haven't seen in nearly a century. And future generations will judge ours by how we respond to this test. Will they say that this was a time when America lost its way and its purpose? When we allowed our own petty differences and broken politics to plunge this country into a dark and painful recession?

Or will they say that this was another one of those moments when America overcame? When we battled back from adversity by recognizing that common stake that we have in each other's success?

This is one of those moments. I realize you're cynical and fed up with politics. I understand that you're disappointed and even angry with your leaders. You have every right to be. But despite all of this, I ask of you what's been asked of the American people in times of trial and turmoil throughout our history. I ask you to believe - to believe in yourselves, in each other, and in the future we can build together.

Together, we cannot fail. Not now. Not when we have a crisis to solve and an economy to save. Not when there are so many Americans without jobs and without homes. Not when there are families who can't afford to see a doctor, or send their child to college, or pay their bills at the end of the month. Not when there is a generation that is counting on us to give them the same opportunities and the same chances that we had for ourselves.

We can do this. Americans have done this before. Some of us had grandparents or parents who said maybe I can't go to college but my child can; maybe I can't have my own business but my child can. I may have to rent, but maybe my children will have a home they can call their own. I may not have a lot of money but maybe my child will run for Senate. I might live in a small village but maybe someday my son can be president of the United States of America.

Now it falls to us. Together, we cannot fail. And I need you to make it happen. If you want the next four years looking like the last eight, then I am not your candidate. But if you want real change - if you want an economy that rewards work, and that works for Main Street and Wall Street; if you want tax relief for the middle class and millions of new jobs; if you want health care you can afford and education that helps your kids compete; then I ask you to knock on some doors, make some calls, talk to your neighbors, and give me your vote on November 4th. And if you do, I promise you - we will win Ohio, we will win this election, and then you and I - together - will change this country and change this world. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless America.


126 Comments

| Leave a comment

Nice hit.

As I've said before: Barack Obama (and all his surrogates) need to hammer home substantive, issue-based attacks on John McCain. No mud-slinging. Keep hitting him on the economy, because as his own advisers have said, if the subject is the economy, McCain loses.

http://thepajamapundit.com/

This is the way it's done! Hit him with the TRUTH, and hit him HARD!

user-pic

Cindy and Sarah will defend ol' Johnnie.

I do think that this steady drip drip drip of comments about his temperament, combined with the repetition of "erratic" is going to make Johnnie very very angry. Grab some popcorn, folks.

Anyone else noticed the people hangin around with McCain?

Cindy, Sarah, Lieberman, and lobbyists. People who either have a lot to lose, or a lot to gain. No one is there because they want to be there...

If you are judged by the company you keep...

Where are all the "rational Republican"? HA! None of them want to get sullied by this trainwreck...

That's not leadership we can believe in!

user-pic

Where are all the Republican women? Why aren't they all out campaigning for McLame and their sister, Palin?

LMAO!

user-pic

Wow. I've completely missed that. You don't see her Fluffiness from Texas, or Olympia Snowe, or Susan Collins, or Libby Dole...

They're not out there. Heather Wilson was on one of the Sunday chat shows, though. She seems, to put it nicely, quite stupid.

user-pic

O Heather Wilson is pathetic!

Has there been anyone but Lieberman campaigning with McCain?

I think a lot of them didn't like getting lit up by the media over Palin with following the talking points when things started going sour...

Does Obama need this?

Is it possibly risky to change tone now?

Just asking.

What "change of tone"? He's done what he's always done - hit McCain on the issues. This is pitch-perfect. While McCain focuses on Bill Ayers and whips the base into a racist frenzy, Obama addresses the issues that actually matter to Americans.

I agree... no change of tone. This line of attack is perfectly fitting with the Obama campaign narrative.

It also capitalizes on what I believe has emerged as Obama's greatest strength... his steady resolve. When so much of the world is on the brink of panic, Obama is coming out looking like the calm in the storm.

McCain looks like he panicking just like the rest of us. Erratic and uncertain indeed.

Keep in mind that a Bin Laden video will likely emerge in the next few days. Obama needs to look tough.

I think all of that stuff about Bin Laden in the debates and convention speech was very deliberate. Its more then just a reminder of Bush's incompetence. Its laying the ground work for a strong statement if Bin Laden should rear his ugly head.

user-pic
...if Bin Laden should rear his ugly head
Over Alaska? I have it on good authority that every bad guy who rears their head do it over Alaska.

If/when UBL releases a video or audio tape between now and 11/4, Obama will aptly tie McIIIrd to booosh's failure to get UBL.

And, McCrappedmypants has stated numerous times the he "knows how to get UBL." Well, wasn't and isn't it unAmerican of him not to share his "strategy/tactics/bullshit" with someone in the position of authority to implement the strategy or tactics?

McCain - the walking dart board.
Obama - the Dart Throwing Master

Game, set and ma....!

I agree with the wording of the speech except for his use of the word "eratic." While it's true that McCain is unpredictable to an alarming degree, a lot of people get turned off by what they perceive as too much negativity.

During the debates, the audience reaction meter would always go down whenever the pushback got a little too intense.

Different audiences. Debates are meant to inform and undecideds watch them to help make their decision. Its just the wrong time to be super negative (even McCain seems to get this.)

If you don't hit back pretty soon the narrative is that you are weak. Which not what people want in an economic crisis or a potential military crisis should one arise between now an election day.

IMO this is the right amount of push back. Strong stuff but way more relevant to the current events.

I think the way it was reported suggested a change of tone. When you actually read what he said, it was on point. The same way with the "say into my face" comment. When you see what he actually said, it was more like "Oh, if it was that important he would have said it to my face". A very elegant way to say it is all a bunch of BS and McCain knows it. An if McCain jumps on it in the next debate, Obama would have an answer ready to make McCain look like an idiot.

I agree with adyacent. Greg is spinning this as change in tone.

The biggest plus of Obama campaign has been "stay on the message, always". All his attacks have been based on the opponents's stated and recorded positions.

And he always has been No Drama Obama and isn't about to change tactics so late in the game.

At this point, Obama has set things up so perfectly, that almost no matter how hard he hits McCain, the voters will still see McCain as running the negative campaign. This is where four months of rope-a-dope pays dividends. Think of it as the eighth round of the Ali-Foreman fight. The big guy is nearly punched out and open to a vicious combination.

Does Obama need this?

Is it possibly risky to change tone now?

Just asking.


Step on their necks when they expose it. McCain has been erratic. This is no lie, and there's no shame in articulating this for voters.

Again, step on their necks. Don't let up. 25 more days, and we can congratulate ourselves and President Obama. Until then, I'm glad to see this from him.

Shorter Obama: "Steady hand at the tiller, my ass."

Talk about "erratic!" -- Here are The Top Ten ‘Debate Notes’ of the ‘Straight-Scribbling’ McCain
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=3832

user-pic

I love how Obama waits just long enough for a frame to be out there, well constructed by others, and the simply jumps in and fills it.

Well, I don't think we can afford that kind of erratic and uncertain leadership in these uncertain times. We need steady leadership in the White House. We need a President we can trust in times of crisis. And that's the kind of President I intend to be.

Little starbursts...

Yeah, I sat up in my couch when I read that.

user-pic

O/T: I've been trying to get at the internals of the Hotline poll, and can't find them anywhere. I'm curious about the economy question, because yesterday showed them tied on that, which strikes me as absurd.

user-pic

erratic: well, I saw vid of the debate that showed some things I hadn't seen during the debate and erratic is right - McLame wandered all over that stage, in front of the camera, the teleprompter; he wandered aimlessly a good deal of the time -

It was weird.

We watched on a little TV, but then I noticed a few time McCain walking in front of the camera and looking lost.

The Daily Show last night nailed it. "Has anyone seen my little dog Puddles?"

user-pic

Yeah that cracked my shit up.

That's where I saw the vid - TDS. Does anyone in the country still think Mclame is perfectly sane? Cause I sure don't.

user-pic

Letterman also hit on it last night. Or was it Jay? (kept switching back and forth and since I'm going on a trip my mind's all over the place!)

Something about 'wandering McCain' I think.

Anyway, without apparently any details, it was funny. Ok!?

I kept thinking back to Admiral Stockdale, in the 2222 debate.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6n5OQVzVVQ

D'oh!! Make that the 1992 debate.

It seems Johnnie has opened Pandora's Box.

Do you think the O campaign would include this in one of their ads about Johnnie's temperament?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/09/report-mccain-exploded-wi_n_133242.html

Probably not, but it would certainly make my year!

user-pic

I just this minute got finished reading that.

I'd love to see him do that at the last debate. I'd love it.

user-pic

No way Obama brings this stuff up, and frankly I'd be surprised if any of his surrogates did.

Do you really want Barack to jeopardize all the momentum he's built for a cheap gotcha moment during a debate?

user-pic

I'm not talking about Obama - I'm talking about McLame - I'd love to see him react the way he did in Puerto Rico.

Sheesh.

user-pic

I wasn't clear on what you were trying to say and didn't mean to offend you.

It seems like McCain's halfway there from watching him over the weeks since the "fundamentals" comment. It's more like a slow-mo meltdown than a fast action, craps moment.

user-pic

Well I just generally refrain from saying Obama needs to do this or that because he's doing way way way better than I ever could think about doing in his position.

:)

user-pic

Based on the people around Obama, after the election people on the left need to organize, ask questions, and fight to shape the direction of both public policy and the Democratic Party.

Of course O shouldn't touch it. I was only joking...

But I really hope it blows up (no pun intended), on the blogosphere. It feeds into the parallel "temperment" argument being made by the O campaign.

Robert Greenwald's out with a timely new video
Rage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAyK-enrF1g

Obama is speaking in Dayton right now.
No mud-slinging, just truth-telling, and hard hitting at that!
Tomorrow he'll be here in my hometown.
Barack the Vote!

Have you seen him in person before? It can be an awesome experience!

Yes, my wife and I went to see him on the OSU campus in February the day after the Cleveland debate with HRC.
A very awesome experience indeed!

user-pic

I'm so jealous. I hate being jealous - it's not a nice emotion.

But I'd give anything to see him in person and I have blown a couple of chances.

I'm an idiot.

Well, here's to having eight years of opportunities to see President Obama! And who knows, in a couple of weeks he might down in Texas turning the Lone Star State blue.

user-pic

I wish but somehow I doubt it.

and I don't know that I'll be there. My best chance was when he was in Espanola. My husband was here, so I didn't go. But dammit, my husband spent the whole day out at the Taos CC (which I love to talk about - it's the only country club I know of that you can join for $500 and play 18 holes for $50 greens fee). If I had realized Mr. Tena was going to hit balls and then play 9, I would have gone.

Too late now - LOL

Yeah, probably going to miss Texas this time around (course I'd have said that about Indiana a month ago). At least you're in the mountains, though...I had a college roommate from Taos, and I can't think of a better place to be. BTW, in my experience there's no such thing as a "quick round of golf."

I saw him for the first time yesterday, took my kids to Indianapolis, and I can attest to this. It was truly inspiring-the crowd, the enthusiasm, and most of all Obama. He conveyed a vision for the country and a down-to-earth understanding all in one, and hammering McCain while he was at it. Everyone was right with him. It's so great to be part of a moment like that and at the same time give a six year-old and a four year-old a memory to last their whole lives. Enjoy tomorrow, Buckeye! (And get there early)

The rally tomorrow will be in downtown Columbus along the Scioto River in Genoa Park.
Can't wait!!!!!

The speech I saw was not so much a "rally the troops" kind of affair. It was hardcore economic policy and laying the blame at the feet of Bush and McCain. It was the Golden, Colorado rally the day after the first big stock market drop. The day after McCain switched from "Fundamentals sound" to "Fundamentals in jeopardy" over lunch. It will likely be remembered as a turning point in this election season when all is said and done.

When we bought our house we were offered both fixed rate and adjustable rate loans. I am certainly no expert in financing but my first reaction was 'why would anyone consider the adjustable rate loan'? I still don't understand how so many people got these. So now our tax money will help these people out? Sheesh!

user-pic

Did they offer you an interest only loan? That's what many of the subprimes did...for a few years; then the payment explodes when principal is included 2 or 3 years down the road. Imagine signing on a dotted line for that B.S. Of course, the front end was pure gravy for lenders. Now the back door is, too.

user-pic

It's a perfect loan if you can't afford to buy a house. Three years, and if the value of the home goes up, you can sell and take the equity away. If the value of the home goes down, you walk away and let the bank deal with it. It's a win-win for homeowners, as long as you are willing and able to possibly destroy your credit and find a new place to live in three years.

The homebuyers weren't the stupid ones. The banks were.

Back in 2003, when I worked as a loan processor for one summer, a lot of people refinanced their homes because the rates were so low. At the time, for a family with a middling credit score, and adjustable rate mortgage seemed like a good deal. We could turn around a loan pretty fast, and we got a lot of pressure to from loan officers. WAMU at the time had a month backlog on home loans being processed for approval.

I imagine that most people weren't given the time to even read the fine print. I agree that an adjustable rate mortgage doesn't seem good on paper, but I have sneaking suspicion that a lot of these loans weren't accurately represented to consumers. I mean I had one loan officer give me obviously fraudulent tax returns. We didn't process that loan, but I imagine someone else probably did. While this person's behavior was by no means representative of my experience, the system is rife with human error because of the time pressures involved and the fact that everyone works on contract. You only get paid when you sell a house and the loan is approved.

The system of buying a home needs to be simplified in all directions. There are so many people involved, all wanting a piece of the pie. Homeowners are often left with no sense of who got what out of their loan beyond what they are paying for their mortgage. All the costs are rolled into the loan.

I admit I have no solutions, and I'm not even in the business anymore. It was a summer job, but it has made me into one of those people who would rather rent than buy a house.

user-pic

You are so right!

I have never gotten the title company thing - that seems to me to be totally unnecessary and it costs both parties to the contract.

Everyone who has ever bought a house knows what that's like at closing - there are fees you never expected out that wazoolie!

It's such a scam.

So true. I'm one of those suckers who refinanced into an ARM at exactly that time. I thought we'd be moving in three years and the deal looked unbeatable. I was flooded with paperwork from all sorts of people and constantly reassured that there were no hidden traps.

I am not a dumb person, but economics is not my thing (I promise never to run for president). Anyway, I finally started thinking it all through, and asking "what if?" What if interest rates skyrocket? What if we can't sell the house, or its value slumps? I refinanced back into a traditional mortgage (broke even with the refinance costs canceling out the low interest payments I'd been making) and dodged a bullet, and boy am I lucky. TIimes are tight, but I'm not on the verge of losing my house, which is right where I'd be with that stupid ARM.

The selling point for these loans was that you couldn't lose money. Real estate prices would just keep climbing. Refinancing would be a snap.

The people who took out interest only loans were told that the value of their homes would go up by 10% per year, at least, so they didn't need to worry about not having any equity.

People tend to believe what they want to believe, especially when everyone around them is raking it in by buying a house and watching the value soar. The American dream, really.

Yeah....own a home.....American Dream...."You're a good, hardworking person," they tell you. "You deserve this and we're going to help you get it. We're on your side."

Sure.....

I know a number of sincere, hardworking people who got sucked into this stuff (including my ex--there goes daughter's college money....). My husband & I had our chance but decided to do something else and keep renting for awhile. A year & a half ago we sure we'd blown it big time. Now, with only tiny credit card balances for debt, I swear we've looked at each other every day for the last month at least and said, "Wow, did we get off lucky!"

Is anybody following the Innocent Renter Evictions story that started in Chicago & seems to be building?

In one of the SNL skits during the primary season, when Obama, HRC and McCain were speaking to Gen.Petraeus, one of the old white senators (played by Bill Hader) began just wandering around aimlessly. I forgot which senator it was supposed to be, but that's what McCain reminded me of.

user-pic

Yeah just like that.

I find it really weird.

The Original Mav-Erratic blinked again. As soon as he took some heat for his Mortgage Buy Out Hail Mary, McCain wilted, and changed the play.

The Original Mav-Erratic Indeed!. McCain is the original windsock. Hey Barbiecuda, your running mate can not stop blinking.

user-pic

Barbiecuda.

LOL

user-pic

Good on Obama for this. Let the McCain camp get all defensive about the senility association that MIGHT be interpreted. I love letting his own campaign suggest he's in the throes of cognitive impairment.

user-pic

Obama has said that McCain looked "Panicked" before.

CT, the Hotline Diageo was an outlier. They changed the reduce Democrats ID from 41 to 40 and moved the Rep ID to 38

Today it is Obama +6, but I can not the ID breakdown today

user-pic

Well gosh I don't trust polls anyway, but I find it illuminating that they just change one component and boom! Obama really has 6 points up on McLame.

Sheeeeeeit!


user-pic

I can't find the internals, either.

McCain, Cindy, Palin are all questioning Obama's judgment based on Ayers, Obama has fired back questioning McCain's judgment on not learning from the Keating Five fall out and now his erratic handling of the Economic meltdown. Obama bases his attacks on current issues, McCain is still fighting the Vietnam War and his disdain for Ayers. Obama attacks without looking like he is attacking because he ties it in with current events/issues.

I don't think Obama is trying to rile up McCain in as much as he is giving him a taste of his own medicine.

His "He didn't say it to my face" statement was simply pointing out that McCain is trying to have it both ways, he's viciously attacking him on the stump speeches in front of partisan crowds, however McCain wants to play the Statesman during the debates.


The beauty part about this attack by O is that it's true. No need to reach into the sewer, like McShame and Failin, for sludge to sling, when your opponent's own behavior gives you all of the ammunition you need to destroy him.

user-pic

Doofus, to me that's the beauty part of Obama's entire campaign.

They can't accuse him of lying about anything cause he hasn't. I loved what Michelle told Jon last night - she said she tells Obama when she doesn't think he's believable. Her whole thing, she said, is that if she doesn't believe him, no one will and she tells him that.

I seriously believe Americans were almost dying for a politician/candidate who tells the truth. You can tell - everyone can.

D'accord.

user-pic

I have to ask: who is your avatar?

Some anonymous guy modeling a tri-corner hat "costume." Probably gay, which I'm not -- not that there's anything wrong with that, you understand. All of my attempts to change it a mullet-sporting doofus have failed, as it keeps defaulting back to this one (maybe Josh and the crew like it??). Anyone else have problems changing their avatars?

D'oh! Tri-corner Hat Man has apparently left the building, and Mullet Man has arrived!

user-pic

You have the goofiest avatars.

And I mean that in a very complimentary way.

And tri-corner hat man is back. The same thing was happening to someone else last night.

AAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's like the "overhead projector" thing. McCain could've just said Obama got millions of pork to a planetarium, and that might have scored points for some -- those who hate educational stuff.

But McCain had to call the projector that recreates the universe an "overhead projector," which is just bullshit.

We're tired of the bullshit. But Obama doesn't bullshit us.

user-pic

Obama isn't really hitting McCain that hard and Obama's tone isn't really that bad. Definitely NOT on the level of the McCain campaign.

Obama's words were just fine by saying that we need a president who isn't erratic and shifting.

I think that's fair game.

It is very curious that since McCain is not offering anything substantive and that what he has offered is half-baked, even quasi deceitful, that people will still vote for him knowing that they are voting against their own self interest.

Thomas Frank has brilliantly addressed this delusional political perception among voters and I cannot help but think and feel that there is also an underlying menace just around the corner.

Hope is the antidote. Take it.

In the eyes of the Republicans the underlying menace is that Obama is half-black.

The menace festers in hatred, ignorance and hopelessness which makes people do crazy things in the right situations. In that regard, I think we should all be very thankful that Palin is as dumb as she is.

She doesn't understand how to turn her little pep rallies into a rallying cry for something much more destructive.

The Chinese say that in every crisis there is opportunity. John McCain has learned this lesson well. Every time he has a crisis he takes it as an opportunity to f*** up again.

user-pic

Yes there's one hell of a long list of crises that John McLame blew.

the USS Forrestall - while everyone else was running toward the conflagration to try to save anyone they could, McLame ran the other way, right to a friend's villa where he decided he'd some R&R without permission - he had no permission to leave the ship

His captivity - he gave the United States of America up to the North Vietnamese as fast as he could and he did it more times than one. And he was just one of almost 700 Americans in that prison and he was the one who talked. A lot.

Keating 5 - yeah he learned - learned to turn it around so it looks like he was a good guy -

Etc. etc. etc.

Mr. Puddles, I have Snausages.....

BACON!

user-pic

LMAO!

That was so damn funny. And sad, too. McLame just looks so damned old wandering around like that -

Yes, Obama will bring change, he'll take part in a HUGE upswing in the economy and revive our status in the world as a whole...BUT...

I saw a YouTube video from a bunch of Ohio nutjobs after a Palin rally saying Obama is a terrorist because he has it in his blood and because of his name.

DECISONS...DECISIONS...WHOEVER WILL I VOTE FOR????? ;-)

Take a look at the clip of Norm Coleman's press guy.This jerk is begging for an ass whipping!

Yes Tena,,,,, McLame did just look so damn old wandering around like that - looking for a place to pee

user-pic

I have to wonder if he was looking at the audience, grimacing, looking down and talking to himself - what?

I just saw him wander around clutching that microphone like it was the only thing that was going to save him from drowning.

The Daily Show's bit on that was hilarious, letting us listen what he was saying, "has any one seen my dog Mr. Puddles...Mr. Puddles. Mr Puddles, I have snausages."

I think he was simply looking for his chair. Reminds me of a couple weeks ago when he couldn't find his way off stage.

user-pic

O Jebus, I think you're right!!!

Erratic - in my mind that's code for senile - losing it - mentally lost.

From one who should know.

I do hope everyone saw that video of these idiots walking outside of a Palin rally yesterday in Strongsville, OH - a bunch of dimwits who outright claim they never heard of Obama until about six months ago, but have known all about Sarah Palin for the last three or four years.

Yup, those small town Alaska mayors are just household names all over the country, aren't they?

In case you haven't seen it, here's a link to HuffPo...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/09/mccain-palin-rally-attend_n_133240.html

user-pic

I'm tired of idiots.

America has about the same number of idiots that every country does and since they are a minority I'd just as soon go back to mostly ignoring them like we used to. I'm really tired of looking at and listening to America's idiots.

We're right on the verge of having an intelligent government and it's going to shut the idiots up - except for the totally psycho ones who are always among us - muttering to themselves, preaching from street corners, trying to assassinate abortion doctors - that shit. I'm sick of it. These people were basically my clients. I spent 15 years taking care of idiots.

I don't want to have to think about them any more. And Obama is going to make that possible - I think.

Tena, I wish I could agree that an Obama government will "shut the idiots up." But remember how loudly and how long the "idiots" whined and railed and spouted garbage during the Clinton years. I'm afraid they're not going away, even if we win.

user-pic

No, but I'm thinking they won't be front and center.

Obama isn't Clinton and that didn't start really until they caught him doing what he shouldn't have done.

I know what you're saying, but I remember a time when America's idiots did not have the principle podium in the country and when we weren't constantly listening to our idiots.


The idiots get way too much attention, especially from the mainstream media.

It seemed to start during the Reagan era and has grown exponentially since then. Forty years ago, the wingnuts would have either been ignored or looked on as shameful. But controversy means increased ratings, so cable and now the networks love these people.

The result of McCain going negative and nutty is that it will be much more difficult for Obama to govern. That may be part of the reason why McCain is going toxic. He wants to poison the well for an Obama administration.


user-pic

I dunno about the governing part. If the Dems increase their majorities substantially, that's going to offset wingnuttery, I would think.

They had every Neanderthal in NE Ohio at that rally.
What an embarrassment for the Cleveland area.
The good news is that Obama wil crush Grampy & Vampy in NE Ohio in spite of these rubes.

One gets the feeling that the Obama Campaign sense that McCain is teetering on the brink. I'm not 100% that the strategy is to goad and unerve him.

I think this was a week where the Obama Campaign sensed they had to weather the storm of negatives. They also had to get through a debate that was allegedly on McCain's "home court" of a Town Hall Meeting, with a Home Court Moderator and potentially the negatives getting raised. All of the potentially boiling into a Narrative for the MSM that might pull the attention away from the economy back onto "personalites", which is where McCain made his push earlier in the year.

I suspect the Obama Campaign were very confident they could weather all that. At worst, a little rope-a-dope simply to let McCain punch himself out, while throwing back a few jabs like the Keating 5. At best...

Well, it seems that everything broke the Obama Campaign's way.

The attacks not only didn't gain traction, but they further pushed the MSM away from McCain. In a sense, they're defining McCain more than Obama.

The Town Hall "advantage" didn't work at all for McCain. I wasn't surprised at all. I think people who've closely followed McCain wouldn't be surprised either, unless they were buying the bullshit on his greatness in this setting. Those people seem to have missed that a large number of his gaffes come in Town Hall settings, and then when not working off softball questions from homer members of the crowd, he tends to stumble around. Obama is also an underrated debator, both in stand up and in town hall settings. I could write a lot more on the points in this paragraph, but being brief, the one thing that didn't surprise me at all in this week was how the debate played out.

Obama also got a minor edge that Ayers and Wright didn't come up in the debate. No doubt he was ready for them, and probably had a decent canned response for them. But it played out better that it didn't come up.

So the two talking points that the McCain Camp wanted to drive the Narrative of the week didn't - the attacks didn't gain tractions, and there was no McCain Comeback Performance in the Debate.

Their third talking point was DOA - the McCain Saves The Economy Plan. The wingnuts hated it, Obama swatted it, and the media did a collective "WTF?" as it's just flopped around like a fish on the boat deck waiting to get thrown in the live well.

In turn, the McCain Camp had to face the reality of the Narrative they wanted to go away *not* going away - the Economy. It remains hot and heavy, seemingly becoming a great issue to the voters with each day. It is the dominant Narrative of the campaign at the moment, and what could be happening in the next month (an economic meltdown, nationalization of the banking industry, a rush to get a stimulous package in time to Save Christmas a/k/a the Christmas Shopping Season) means that it's not coming off the table. That's bad for the McCain Camp, and they know it.

The secondary Narratives are also ones the McCain Campaign didn't want to keep talking about:

* McNegative
* McLiar
* McEratic

Big chunks of the MSM isn't buying the bullshit anymore. Sure, there are plenty of Tire Swingers still out there. But guys like Roger Simon are finding it increasing hard, if not impossible, to drive the Narrative. The MSM is hip to the fact that McCain's gone 24/7 Negative. The Lying issue never really got off the table, even if the Economy lapped it. McCain's behavior while Suspending his campaign seemed to firm up to a lot of the media that he and his talking heads were lying left and right. And the Suspending finally brought into focus what a lot of us already believe - he's one erratic person (I think a lot of us prefer terms like "bat shit crazy", but "eratic" plays better with the media).

This week's actions have also only firmed up those storylines.

The polling is strong, especially in the Battlefield States... which now are almost exclusively States that *McCain* is having to defend, rather than the Kerry States.

This all adds up to the fact that McCain largely shot his wad, and here were are on Thusday with McCain punched out and the Obama Campaign feeling fresh here in the late rounds of the fight opposite a cut, bleeding, gased out opponent.

They're not trying to goad and unerve McCain.

They're going for the knockout punch to close out the week, to sit in the voters heads over the weekend, and to push into next week with not just a "wide" lead, but a commanding one while McCain collapses.

They "jabbed" earlier in the weak with Keating.

They're now throwing combos, and from all angles.

They sense McCain in trouble and are going to pepper the crap out of him. They don't fear his punching power anymore, believing they've taken his best shots. In a sense, they're walking through McCain's punches at the moment *to get at McCain*.

Unlike fights, there isn't any three knock down rule, and the ref can't jump in to stop this. Even if they beat McCain senseless, the fight still goes on until 11/4. But their objective here is to beat him so senseless, send him to the mat so many times, that everyone but his "family" (i.e. the hardest of the hardcores) will see him as a beaten fighter crumpled in the corner.

Boxing analogy for or boxing loving GOP Nominee.

I don't think the Obama Campaign cares at this point if McCain blows up or doesn't. They just want to get in their punches now each time McCain stands back up after a knockdown.


John

Great analysis. In basketball terms, they are way up with time running out, but still playing a full-court press. And that's the right thing to do, because an election is not like boxing or basketball. Winning isn't the only thing, margins matter. They need to press the advantage and go for the landslide.

And McCain is running out of options. Everyone's just waiting for the Jeremiah Wright attack, and when it comes (next week?) it will fall right into the existing narrative--McCain's changing the subject, going dirty, lying.

Also, I think we have to admit that Hillary actually helped set this stage. If she hadn't gone low in the primaries, Ayers and Wright would be fresh issues. They would take weeks to run their course and might really be changing things right now. As it is, they are old news.

As much as I hate to admit it, you're probably right.

At the time, it seemed like she opened the door to racist attacks but actually she and especially the media played the Wright thing to the point of nausea.

Everyone is sick to death of it, which is why McGrumpy is sticking to Ayers.

I agree with all of this. And McCain has some issues in playing the Wright card himself, as does Palin. The Obama's no doubt have locked and loaded anti-Jewish comments by a variety of McCain-Palin "spiritual leaders". We've already seen perfectly from Robert Gibbs the *attack* lines (rather than defensive lines) that the Obama camp can play:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/john-amato/obama-spokesman-gibbs-smokes-sean-hanni

Rather than Ayers, think of Wright.

That *may* be the one thing the Obama campaign is trying to goad McCain/Palin/Schmidt into play - going with Wright "now" rather than the week before the election. Get it out there, difuse it again, hit back, and focus again on the economy.

John

Re: The secondary Narratives are also ones the McCain Campaign didn't want to keep talking about:

* McNegative
* McLiar
* McEratic

Add to that McGrumpy and McGrudge. McPeevish too.

Take a gander at what passes for "hot" in right wing circles. Are you kidding me.

Frozen Tundra Frump Chic is in.


http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/401/slide_401_10569_large.jpg

You don't know right wing Neandrathal until you visit Wheaton, IL - a Chicago suburb that is (and this is a fact) 95% registered Republican.

This is a town that recently passed a village bill to construct a bronze George W. Bush statue in front of its library.

Anyone from the Chicago area knows all about Wheaton! Cheney visited there THREE TIMES in 2004!

But thanks to the Democratic vote of the city of Chicago cancelling out the Republican suburban vote, Illinois will never, ever become a red state!

user-pic

lucky.

;)

Ooh, has anyone seen the article in the NY Times today with the headline "Obama projects a steady temperament"?

They're on it because it's a good story and a convincing narrative--and, to my delight--despite the right-wing media paranoia it will feed. And as far as I'm concerned, the media has a lot of making up to do, now that the days of shiny-star McMaverick are coming to an end.

The only "tiller" McIIIrd is qualified to have his hand on is a "rototiller" (no gas in the tank, so he's harmless)!

user-pic

Why is all fuck is Obama/Biden giving McInsane an attaboy.

Saying that McInsane was shown any leadership . . . Erratic or even existant is a gross exaggeration.

Why do they keep building the addle-minded anger junkie up?

Well Rich Lowry is erotic and quite certain.

So it kind of balances that out.

user-pic

We go with the Treasury Secretary we got. Henry lead us to the promised land: The New New Deal. Dethrone Milton Friedman/Arnold Greenspan (Markets work;governments don't), install John Maynard Keynes/FDR (they helped save capitalism the last time).

Memo to Obama: Drop Robert Rubin and Larry Summers and the rest of the free market deregulators on your team.

Just like Nixon who found peace with China, Paulson can lead to us to a caring socialism/capitalism. It's possible: we could become a loving Scandinavian country.

Dr Wu, the last of the big-time thinkers

user-pic

We go with the Treasury Secretary we got. Henry lead us to the promised land: The New New Deal. Dethrone Milton Friedman/Arnold Greenspan (Markets work;governments don't), install John Maynard Keynes/FDR (they helped save capitalism the last time).

Memo to Obama: Drop Robert Rubin and Larry Summers and the rest of the free market deregulators on your team.

Just like Nixon who found peace with China, Paulson can lead to us to a caring socialism/capitalism. It's possible: we could become a loving Scandinavian country.

Dr Wu, the last of the big-time thinkers

Dudes . . .

My non-professional take-away is this:

Obama is reinforcing his debate performance, setting up for the next one, and, most importantly, addressing his biggest weakness in the polls about the last debate.

Remember?? Undecided voters STILL, inexplicably, see McCain as the preferable choice for defending America.

So, by deliberately pointing out that McCain's playing the "talk-behind-your-back" bully game--and by pointedly making his statements about McCain's foreign policy blunders TO HIS FACE in the town hall . . . Obama's hammering away at that number .

Shoot. Ever since Obama dressed down Lieberman in the Senate, McCain should have (and I think does) realize that he has no chance of intimidating or cowing the junior Senator from Illinois. Instead, well fill it in for yourselves . . .

This piece by Matt Taibbi on Karl Rove's recent, unremarked-upon, stealth role in McCain's campaign explains a lot of the slime, sleaze that we're seeing:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23482821/the_return_of_rove/print

Cindy McCain calls Obama's the "dirtiest campain in history".

Obama may have bought a $3 million projector.

But McCain is married to a $100 million projector.

Now...

Let us reflect on the gift that Sarah Palin has given us all:

http://thetruthburns.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/maybe-i-aint-no-genius-but-is-sure-is-smartern-her/

Throw that drowning erratic jerk another anvil.

user-pic
This issue is personal for me. My mother died of ovarian cancer at the age of 53, and I'll never forget how she spent the final months of her life lying in a hospital bed, fighting with her insurance company because they claimed that her cancer was a pre-existing condition and didn't want to pay for treatment.

Haven't heard this before, not that that means a lot--I haven't been reading his speeches recently. But, not to go all concern-troll or anything, it's the kind of thing the 101st Kerning Examiners go after. Anyone know if he's written or talked about this before?

I just got back from Obama's speech in Cincy. The crowd was large, loud, and very diverse. He hammered McSame about being risky and erratic. The crowd went wild when Obama said "eratic".
The area where the speech was given is an upper middle class neighborhood where multiple Obama/Biden signs were displayed in abundance.
Everyone I talked to had already voted. There were people who claimed to have never even considered voting Democratic before now.
McSame is looking more and more like toast. Even our longtime Republicant congress critter is in trouble.

user-pic

Little meaningless anecdote, but here in Texas today I saw an SUV driven by your average looking suburbanite sporting two bumper stickers: "God Bless John Wayne" and "Obama/Biden '08." Not saying anything in perticurler, just sayin '.

Leave a comment

Recommended Reader Posts

  • Unwritten...
    by stillidealistic
  • BABIES, RACCOONS AND HEALTH CARE
    by dickday
  • Two Dreamers, by Dorothea Lange
    by Rutabaga Ridgepole
  • Tsunami Wave: Will Wipe Out Republican Party
    by coonsey
  • OBVIOUSLY, YOU AREN'T A HUNTER.....
    by wvbiker
  • The Stupack Amendment played politics with women's lives and won.
    by J. Clarence
  • wooden projects
    by kubaser
  • holly colorado
    by blumun
  • figures geometry
    by muberul
  • short stories
    by lumacer



  • Resources

    The Palin Effect

    GOP Map Of Sleaze

    Tire Swinging

    The Final Debate

    World of Sleaze

    All About Sarah

    The Presidential Debates: Round 2

    The Vice-Presidential Debates: Biden v. Palin

    Critic or Cheerleader The Definitive McCain Iraq Timeline

    The John McCain John Hagee Timeline

    Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Reporter-Bloggers
    Elana Schor
    Eric Kleefeld



    Subscribe to this blog's feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address