« Obama Attacks McCain-Palin For Stoking Fear and Anger At Rallies | Home | A Day At The Congressional Races »

Note To News Orgs: McCain And Palin Are Largely Responsible For Unhinged Tone At Their Rallies

The news orgs are beginning to weigh in with big takes on what is unquestionably one of the most important stories of Campaign 2008: The pathologically-unhinged tone that McCain-Palin supporters are displaying at rallies of late.

The New York Times has a write-up here; The Washington Post has one here, and The Politico has one here.

This is a welcome development, and the stories are pretty good. But the news orgs are still dancing around the central story here: That McCain and Palin themselves are largely responsible for what's happening.

The Times, for instance, does say that McCain's rallies are worse than Obama's, but nonetheless bemoans negative campaigning on "both sides." WaPo very politely notes that McCain and Palin "drew on the crowd's energy" as they attacked Obama yesterday (actually, they fed the crowd's "energy"). And Politico says that the anger is driven by Obama's momentum and fears that McCain will lose.

No question, there are a number of factors at play. But surely the most important one is the role that McCain and Palin themselves are playing in creating the toxic hysteria that reigns at the rallies they are running.

Let's consider a partial list of what the McCain camp has done recently:

* The McCain campaign is going well beyond raising questions about Obama's association with Ayers, repeatedly insinuating that Obama is currently in league with a current terrorist.

* Palin has repeatedly accused Obama of "palling around with terrorists."

* McCain himself has embarked on an effort to paint Obama as a vaguely sinister enemy within, with lines like this: "Who is the real Barack Obama?

* When a McCain supporter at a rally yesterday ranted that the country is being taken over by "socialists," and called Obama and Nancy Pelosi "hooligans," McCain didn't utter a peep of protest, and basically agreed.

* Cindy McCain basically accused Obama of endangering her son and other troops serving in Iraq with his vote against an Iraq funding bill, even though McCain also opposed a funding bill because it contained a withdrawal timetable.

* Palin attacks the media almost every day, even though her supporters are abusing reporters at her gatherings.

* Palin attacked Obama over Reverend Wright, and the campaign didn't disavow it -- even though McCain himself said in April that his campaign supposedly wanted no part of attacks on Wright.

But here's the most important point: To my knowledge neither McCain nor Palin has uttered a single syllable of protest as their crowds indulged their fear and loathing of Obama. It's hard to overstate how reckless and lacking in leadership this is -- and how dangerous this is, too.

Even an establishmentarian like David Gergen is now alarmed at the McCain team's own role in fomenting all the fury. "There is a free-floating sort of whipping-around anger that could really lead to some violence," Gergen said last night. "And I think we're not far from that...I think it's really imperative the candidates try to calm people down."

Or listen to Joe Klein: "We are on the edge of some real serious craziness here and it would be nice if McCain did the right thing and told his more bloodthirsty supporters to go home and take a cold shower."

But neither McCain nor Palin has taken a single step to do anything like that. Surely that's the big story here.


196 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Anybody remember the accusations that if Jesse Jackson arrives at a rally that rally becomes hateful?

Well - it's McCain or Palin - if they show up -- the hate builds and builds, while they do NOTHING to curb it.

user-pic

Jack Beatty on "On Point" this morning told me that the crowds are angry at Obama because of the economy.

How come he still has a job?

He was also outraged over Stephen Colbert a couple of years ago, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

user-pic

when and where was that?

user-pic

"On Point" plays on one of the NPR stations in CT at 10:00 AM. The program started with a discussion of the economy, with a writer for the Economist, a reporter for Politico, and Jack. He mentioned that you could feel the anger at Obama in the crowds in the context of the economy.

Here's a link: On Point

user-pic

You should highlight the differences in approach from the candidates. Remember at an Obama rally last spring when he mentioned Clinton's name and the crowd booed? Obama told them to stop and to be nice.

Jack Beatty is basically phoning it in from NH. I doubt he's even been to a campaign event up there.

Greg, Beatty is a regular on the Friday news roundup on NPR's "On Point" hosted by Tom Ashbrook out of Boston's WBUR.

user-pic
Jack Beatty is basically phoning it in from NH. I doubt he's even been to a campaign event up there.

He certainly doesn't sound like he's been to one.

I think Jack is semi-retired and has been phoning it in to the Atlantic Monthly for some time. He's usually pretty bright, but I don't sense a lot of energy in his approach to checking the details out. I didn't hear this morning's "On Point," abut I'll check out the re-broadcast this evening.

user-pic

He may have modified that opinion later in the broadcast--I don't know, because I stopped listening about 15 minutes in....

user-pic

On point is a miserable show, even on the best of days. Ashbrook is a dolt who continually interrupts his guests to summarize their points for them in "plain talk" that almost aways misses their point. Jack Beatty is the semi-lierate co-host whose main purpose appears to be to spew historical annecdotes on cue.

The whole thinsg is absolutely ghastly and an embarrassment to BU.

Addiction is very hard to break and the corporate media has had a McCain's jones for the past 20 years. It's really hard to criticize your hero in the best of times, but when you're still addicted to a fantasy (McCain = maverick hero), it becomes harder to face reality and do your job. I don't expect that we'll see a harder stance on McCain from the corporate media until some blood is spilled or at least, a window broken.

Thank you Greg for pointing this out. I was a journalist living in Israel during the Rabin debacle and this is the kind of atmosphere they got going and no one called it out. Where are the adults in the media? The Republican party?

They're too damn afraid to appear biased. It's sickening. This is the weakness of our media. Cowards.

http://pufferfish.typepad.com/

What shocks me is Joe Klein's take on everything over the last month or so - he was so anti-Dem during the primaries...now he's tearing McCain a new one in all of his columns, especially about Palin!

Never thought I'd hear myself say this, but GO JOE KLEIN!!!

user-pic

Gotta defend Klein here. He wrote many articles praising the Dems during the primaries, e.g. one in Time promoting Hillary's health care plan as the best of the bunch.

He calls himself "a raging moderate" and given Obama's desire to build alliances with Republicans I fail to see how/why we don't welcome such moderates into the party. Independents will decide this election after all.

Carry on! :)

I put this in the previous thread, but this is very relevant!

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003873017

user-pic

Very helpful. Thanks for the link!

At the risk of being labelled as a spammer by some here, I recommend that you post it to every thread that comes up today and also that you blog it at the Cafe.

user-pic

I love editor&publisher. It's a great source.

Thanks!

Thanks for the link! It made my day! Always nice to have a enough ammo on hand for a verbal fire fight with a repug.

user-pic

Note 2 To News Orgs: Obama and Biden are partly responsible for hundreds of thousands of fraudulent voter registrations nation wide.

How so?

SFC, Tell us honestly, do you approve the style of campaign your guy is running ?

user-pic

Hilarious! I especially like the "partly responsible" part.

Couple with the completely off-topic nature of your comment, it's just vintage wingnuttery.

user-pic

The "partly responsible" was a shot a Greg's attempt to blame McCain for the anger of people attending his rallies.

SFC, are you also a coward, like your guy, to answer my question posted above ? Is that a skirt you are wearing ?

user-pic

I don't think there's anything wrong with McCain linking Obama to his political associates... Obama's been trying to link McCain to Bush and Phil Grahm for months... Same thing different associates.

Oh, that's right. Obama is telling the truth. What can we, repugs, to do counter that ? Yes, we got it. Let's smear him with innuendos, incite our base with hackle raising racist tactics, which is being called out by majority of the people. And oh, Fuck the economy.

You are pathetic.

user-pic

That's right...any chriticism of TheMessiah is racist...I remember now...you're right...we're wrong....don't even bother voting...it's his destiny...who am I to question that?

Get a life SFC.

Here, read these (if you can) and weep (which you are doing now)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/10/75743/461/414/626076

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14445.html

The second one is from one of your own. So, you should love it.

I thought you would have the guts to admit what your guy is doing wrong. Apparently, you don't. Ciao.

Obama's been "trying to link" McCain to his campaign’s co-chair and his chief economic advisor and his party's President (whom he has voted with 90% of the time) so you guys try and link Obama with a radical from the '60s who Obama has, at most, a cursory relationship with?

That's really the defense you're going with? I’m a loss for words at the sheer idiocy of that rationalization.

user-pic

Actually Obama voted with Ayers 100% of the time for seven years they served together. If the Ayers relationship is no big deal, why did Obama lie about it?

user-pic

I am desperately hoping and praying for a Democratic victory in November, not because of specific policy differences I have with McCain and the Republicans, nor because I am particularly enamored of the Dems. In point of fact, I on a fairly significant number of issues, I actually agree with the Republican positions.

The reason is despise the Republican party is because of their unbridled lust for and ruthless pursuit of power for power’s sake. There is no tactic too foul, contradiction too spurious, delusion too tenuous, nor prejudice too despicable for the Republicans to embrace, exploit and justify if it has bears the slightest chance of improving theirs odds of obtaining power. The spectacle of John McCain pimping his honor like a worn out whore has long ceased to be news. Like an addict in search of their next fix, the modern Republican Party will stop at nothing in their soulless quest for power.

What do they do with that power once they have it? They wield it not merely to defeat, but to destroy and silence those who would dare to disagree with them. “Country First” isn’t a moral code to them, it’s a public proclamation of their first intended victim.

The Democrats are often mistaken, sometimes silly and always naïve, but the Republican Party is evil; lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride - all seven of the deadly sins are its underlying principles, encouraging and enflaming them in its followers, corrupting their character to accept any and all offense against the conscience. It starts with small transgressions, but unchecked, it grows and will bring ruin upon us all.

I am a Democrat because I would rather associate with earnest, but honest souls than consort with brownshirts.

user-pic

If there's one truth in politics, it's you don't hide stuff that doesn't matter...

user-pic

He's been talking about it. He's daring McCain to bring it up. How, exactly, is that "hiding" anything?

user-pic

This is the same logical construct that Bushco used re: Iraq. McCain and Palin want Obama to "come clean" about Ayers, and W wanted Saddam to "come clean" on WMDs. You know how that works.

user-pic

Yep...Saddam didn't come clean and got his ass kicked...from your lips to God's ears!

user-pic

"He was just a guy from my neighborhood..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEajOYOE5Yw&feature=related
1)Obama's political coming-out party in the mid-1990s was hosted by Ayers and Dohrn.
2)Michelle Obama organized a panel discussions in which Ayers and Obama both took part.
3)Obama and Ayers served together on the board of the Woods Fund for three years.
4)In April 2002, Ayers, Dohrn, and Obama, then an Illinois State Senator, participated together at a conference entitled “Intellectuals: Who Needs Them?”
5)Obama and Ayers worked together at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
6)Obama wrote a review of one of Ayers' books.
7)Michelle worked at the same law firm as Dohrn (Ayers' wife)in the late 80's.

Does that make Obama a terrorist sypathizer? Absolutely not! Does it mean he was lying when he said "he's just a guy from my neighborhood?" Absolutely!!

You mental midget. There is no mention of Obama or ACORN in the Houston link you gave. Maybe you should try reading the articles the wingnuts send your way before linking them.

You are not worth the time...

Although, I do find it hilarious that the folks quoted are so "aghast" at the prospect of voter fraud in Texas. Where the hell have they been? LOL! Jeebus, read a little history folks...

user-pic

LOLOLOL!!

Well no shit, Sherlock.

I guess they never heard of the Duke of Duvall County.

user-pic

OMG!!!!

10 troublesome registrations in Connecticut! 10!!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIIII!!!!! What's happening to our country?????????

user-pic

YOu knew they'd attack on the voter registration because they can't stand it that the GOP has lost over 600,000 registered Repug voters and we've registered over 12,000,000 Democratic voters.

Of course they were going to accuse us of fraud. Projection anyone? They are the practitioners of massive vote fraud, vote suppression and cheating in elections. The Republicans are unAmerican - they hate our freedoms! They hate our democracy.

I'm sick to death of Republicans and I hope they disappear. I hope they are replaced by another party with a different name. I hope Republican becomes synonymous with infamy for every AMerican, not just liberals. And they are working on it really hard.

Bush stole two elections and the Republicans have engaged in voter suppression unabashedly over the past two elections.

So SFCWallace, tit-for-tat, you can dish it out but can't take it!


user-pic

At least you are honest enough to admit that the fraud is on your side.

user-pic

The only party guilty of subverting democracy is the Republican Party.

End of story. they've done it and done it and done it - Nixon on down through every single Republican administration since.

Republicans are not American. They hate us for our freedoms.

user-pic

"The only party guilty of subverting democracy is the Republican Party." For every case of "suppression" you come up with I can cite 3 examples of "fraud" on your side.

Come back and report to us when you catch someone using the fraudulent registrations. This wasn't an attempt to stuff the ballot box, it was an attempt by those collecting registrations to earn more money.

user-pic

...ok...it's fine then. As long as the fraud got them some extra cash.

It's easy when every registration form that is filled out with sloppy handwriting or is going toward an already registered voter who just wanted to make sure he's registered (he registered a long time ago, but was that at the old place before or after he moved?) is being considered evidence of "fraud."

To SFCWallace:

There is a qualitative difference between what you call voter "fraud" and outright voter suppression.

In any large-scale voter registration effort, there will be duplications, mistaken addresses, even some overzealous canvassers perhaps... as pointed out here it is the official registrar of voters who is responsible to sort these issues out.

However, GOP efforts at voter suppression are proven to have occurred all over the country - and instead of being individual problems - are instead larger efforts to suppress the votes on a massive scale (into the multiple thousands) eg: FL & OH (MI too?).

Simply put these are separate issues that are NOT qualitatively or quantitatively the same.

It seems to me that since an Obama Victory seems more and more likely by the hour - the fringe rightists of the GOP now want to call into question the legitimacy of an Obama Win.

I don't think it will work - I think the Election will be all but over before the Mountain time zones even start reporting on the night of 11/4.

You can't argue with a Landslide - dude.

user-pic

The DOJ tried and tried to come up with voter fraud cases under Gonzales. They made a big nationwide push. And what did they wind up with? About a dozen or so actual cases, most of which were more cases of ignorance or confusion than malice. There is simply no epidemic of people voting illegally.

There are plenty of documented instances of voter suppression.

I admit nothing other than that you are a sore loser and a troll.

Link not working...

user-pic

Those articles look familiar...

There is nothing in those articles that says that -- what are you talking about.

user-pic

Gee there's a surprise.

Naturally. The truth has a liberal bias. It always has.

ACORN pays their workers by the hour, not by the number of registration forms they collect.

It is then ILLEGAL for an ACORN person to do anything BUT take that voter's registration form to the appropriate Voter's Registration office even if they question the legality of it to begin with.

Again, it is ILLEGAL to do anything else to that piece of paper - they MUST turn it in.

Losers that write otherwise.

How are they responsible? And how will those fake voters be able to vote and affect the election anyway?

Turns out the guilty persons involved in the voter frauds are registered republicans who have been working an undercover fifth column action to discredit the voter drive to make the democrats look bad.

user-pic

Show a link to that and you win.

Pull up your skirt SFCWallace.

user-pic

It's not a skirt...it's a kilt Damn it!

Whatever it is, its exposing the fact that you're reeling.

user-pic

Please don't try to insult this guy by implying he wears a skirt. It's just insulting to women, most of whom have infinitely more integrity and courage than that silly twit.

Besides, if he's wearing anything down there, it's probably a diaper.

Are you related to George Wallace?

The real story is these people are despicable. This is a scorched earth policy, if I have ever seen one.

The McCain-Palin campaign will go down as one of the most odious, and luckily, one of the most incompetent campaigns in American History.


The McCain-Palin campaign will go down as one of the most odious, and luckily, one of the most incompetent campaigns in American History.

Wait for Palin/Gingrich '12

Greg,

Change Partly your headline to Largely.

One DB

LOL, you read my mind!

user-pic

Thank you, TPM. Now is the time for the grown-ups to stand up and step in. This is not a time to pussy-foot. It is not a time to sow chaos.

Please stay in this story. You can't sit on the sidelines when civility itself is on the ropes.

user-pic

Please stay "on" this story. God forbid you're "in" it!

user-pic

Why is the press making excuses for them? Why?

*sigh*

Tena, I remember you defending the press just two days back. What happened ?

user-pic

I defend the press or anyone when they are doing right and the press has been doing a good job lately.

I still reserve the right to sigh if I want to.

And I reserve that right to criticize the press if I want to.

user-pic

fine.

if you like, I'll not read nor comment on your comments. whatever.

It is fine by me too.

user-pic

you got it.

i don't understand the hostility, but since it's there, i'd just as soon not have to deal with it all the time.

i'm sorry if my comments are so effective that you find you have to wait until you can pounce on me to get back.

sheeit.


I think this is the price McCain is paying for selecting Palin. He seems ambivalent about the crowds because he is a party of one, he has contempt for everyone who hasn't been a POW including those in his own party.

But he chose Palin to bring the wackos into his fold and now he has to play with that deck.

If Palin stays on the ticket and McCain continues the Nixonian BS that Fannie and Freddie was a Democratic plan to funnel taxpayer's money to "those people" then the wacko right is set to join militias and devolve into their favorite survivalist fantasies. That is going to get real ugly.

But I caution folks not to assume that small town and rural neighborhoods are monolithis is this regard. The nativist wackos are going to get more isolated and more desperate.

user-pic

Frankly I think mcShame has contempt for everyone period. I think he has contempt of Linzy Graham, for JoeSchmo. We know he does for his wife. And in no time he'll share that with his Partner and Soulmate in Infamy.

user-pic

I agree with you - and there is no monolithic community outside of walled compounds of nut jobs who are monolithic in their wackjob-ness.

There really aren't enough of them to start much, but anything at all is scary enough.

"partially responsible" Wrong! They are fully responsible. You can not go after the big papers for never calling out just McCain/Palin without also blaming the Democrats, and then turn around and do the same thing on TPM. "Partially Responsible". Then who are the others? Isn't the tone being set, and the ads being run by McCain/Palin?

There is something very Nuremberg 1938 about McCain rallies right now.

Scares me.

user-pic

Alarms me. But also galvanizes me. We've seen the past. We want no part of fascism. We must speak out. And stand up. For civil discourse. And not chaos or anarchy or a fascist solution to them.

McCain is playing with fire. It's just a matter of time before some nitwit gets carried away and does something serious.

If it wins him the election, do you think he really cares what someone does to make it happen?

Note 2 To News Orgs: SFCWallace is scared as fuck, and reeling by the way.

Check out this article on Yahoo news.

About 2/3rds of the way down is the stand alone sentence:

"There is also the belief that taking out Obama is the only way to win."

This is beyond crazy!

Panic attacks: Voters unload at GOP rallies
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081010/pl_politico/14445

user-pic

That's some disgustingly irresponsible writing on the part of the AP.

user-pic

Hopefully he meant "figuratively." If not, he's nuts.

user-pic

For once, we agree!

user-pic

WHAT!?


O my god. These people are reprehensible.

Scary. I never thought it would get this bad. I figured there would be swiftboating and some level of *political* nastiness, etc. but this is insane...

I think this will be a big story from here on out.

You know, reading that Politico/Yahoo article, it occurs to me to hope that John McCain's Secret Service detail is really on their toes, also! Sounds as if the really right-wing nuts are looking at him as preventing their ability to *really* go after Obama --- wishes that Barracuda Sarah were at the top of the ticket and able to really take up the fight, no holes barred!

Worst of all, the seeds of hate that McCain/Palin are cynically sowing will not just whither away on election day.

Palin will sink back into obscurity. McCain will offer a dishonest mea culpa and the Tire Swing Caucus will all write stories about how McCain was really always a good man at heart who was tragically forced into being a hate-mongering douchenozzle by the bad economy and bad advisors.

But you can't just stir up this kind of hate and then say "just kidding!" on the day after the election.

But you can't just stir up this kind of hate and then say "just kidding!" on the day after the election.

But, that's the point after all: energize the base to fight a "government-in-exile" type of political guerilla warfare, as the local hate talk radio jock/jerk here puts it. Rile up those "true patriots" to attack the Dems at every turn until they can be drummed out of power in 2012. An appeal to anger and fear is far more motivating than trying to convince with reason.

"Sarah Palin, Miss Alaska, is saying she doesn't know who Barack Obama really is. That's interesting because she also doesn't know who Sarkozy is, Gordon Brown, Kim Jong-Il, Hugo Chavez, Vladimir Putin, Osama bin Laden." --David Letterman

Does anyone think McCain and Palin are inciting the crowds to prevent Obama from being a successful President? It seems to me that one of McCain's motives in whipping up the conservatives is to ensure that partisan divisions remain after the election.

Maintaining the partisan divide is the only way that Republicans keep any power after the expected losses in the House and Senate this November. They're fighting to stay relevant. They're terrified that Obama will unite the country.

This might also explain why McCain doesn't seem to care that he's perceived as flailing around and speaking only to the base conservatives. That's exactly who he is talking to, but not to win the election but to keep some toehold in the national politics. Maybe McCain is essentially conceding the election?

user-pic

They will try. But it's up to those who want UNITY to make ourselves such a powerful force that UNITY will prevail.

From the start of this race I've wanted a button that says UNITY. Now is the time. We all need those buttons.

Once we fought for a Hospice. Those who didn't want it "in the neighborhood" found they could not be "against" the hospice. They came up with all sorts of arguments, which never prevailed.

Honestly, it will hard to argue against UNITY.

Does anyone think McCain and Palin are inciting the crowds to prevent Obama from being a successful President?

Absolutely.

Scorched earth. Poisoning the well. Turd in the punchbowl...Whatever else you want to call it, they're doin' it.

To the point about how dangerous the McCain-Palin baiting has become: It is starting to remind me of the atmosphere in Israel preceding Yitzhak Rabin's assassination.
As Haaretz has reported, "posters depicting [Rabin] as a Nazi distributed by extreme rightists in some instances, is often blamed for encouraging the assassination." Rabin, near the end, was subject to hateful epithets at his rallies.
For McCain and Palin to stand idly by while people at their rallies shout "kill him" and "terrorist," is, frankly, unconscionable.
Sen. McCain: You once accused Obama of being willing to lose a war in order to win an election. Are you yourself now willing to incite your followers' basest, even murderous, instincts to achieve the same end?

user-pic

I was in Israel some months before Rabin was assassinated. I saw posters plastered to public walls showing him in Arab headdress with blood dripping from his face.

Once you paint someone as a traitor to the country they become an acceptible target in many people's minds - anything to "save" the country. This is what McCain is taking part in.

Its only be a matter of time when hear the 'N' word and only then the media will actually realize McCain-Palin rallies have gone too far.

user-pic

In addition to moderate Republicans calling out McCain on this vile crap - where the fuck are Bill Clinton and Russ Feingold now???

After all the nice words those two have had about McCain during this campaign it's now their fucking responsibility to publicly and unequivically denounce McCain and Palin for firing up the mobs.

Russ Feingold in particular can go fuck himself forever if he doesn't.

user-pic

Word straight motherfucking up!

Where is Feingold? Is he no longer a Democrat?

Maybe because Obama hasn't had an event for awhile in WI? The last time Obama was in Wisconsin Russ spoke very highly of Obama and was tough on McCain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7BUlS0KPI8

Such a horrible Democrat, Russ is....

http://www.progressivepatriotsfund.com/patriot-corps/

user-pic

Thanks for filling me in - I hadn't heard anything.

But then I was saying yesterday that we don't hear about all the Democrats who out campaigning.


I live in that "Alabama" part of Pennsylvania and have a carry permit. I am also a Progressive/Liberal who believes in the second amendment. I do not leave the house unarmed now, it used to be I never really thought about being armed , unless I knew I was going to a Dangerous/High Crime area.
I also wear an Obama campaign button on my jacket.
If a Right Wing Nutball causes me fear for my safety, I can guarantee him instant "Rapture"

I have a co-worker from PA (poconos area) she loves to refer to her former home state as Pennsyltucky.

It will only be a matter of time when we hear the 'N' word and only then the media will actually realize McCain-Palin rallies have gone too far.

user-pic

What happens when violence breaks out, as it certainly will? I'd predict that the story will be about a few bad apples.

The demand for symmetry will be broken on election day. Only after Obama wins, in the hail of post hoc explanations, will it become permissible to view the candidates' actual behavior as contributory. Probably under the rubric of a 'failed tactic', and no doubt one forced on them by bad-apple advisors.

Oilbama, who voted for the Bush Cheney Energy Bill, apparent role model of late is Bill Clinton.
With the economy in crisis and Election Day in sight, Obama can't say enough about the Clinton years- the job growth, the budget surpluses, the broad prosperity - and frequently praises the
former president's economic stewardship as a model. "We need to do what we did in the 1990s and create millions of new jobs and not lose them," he told 6,000 people in Abington, outside Philadelphia, last week. "We need to do what we did in the 1990s and make sure people's incomes are going up and not down. We need to do what a guy named Bill Clinton did in the 1990s and put people first again." Oilbamabots, who derided Bill Clinton as a Racist and proudly cheered while Oilbama media shills called Hillary a F*cking Wh*re, cheered. Oilbama's characterization of Clinton's presidency is markedly different than the one he offered during the Democratic primaries, when he was running against Clinton's wife, Senator Hillary Clinton. Oilbama argued that, despite the successes, Bill Clinton let some of the country's biggest problems fester while in the White House. The implication - that his two terms had not been indisputably positive for American families - was one the former president deeply resented. It was always a totally bullshit awkward argument to make, but one Oilbama felt he had to: After all, Hillary Clinton was running in part to revive her husband's economic legacy, which many Democrats recall fondly. Oilbama's fully embracing the 1990s would have been tantamount to embracing his opponent. Now, twofaced scumbag liar that Oilbama is, is offering a Clinton restoration to create a foil for what he calls the failed economic philosophies of President Bush and Oilbama's presidential rival, John McCain. "America can't take four more years of John McCain's George Bush policies," he said yesterday in Dayton, Ohio.
Oilbama proves once again he is a typical scumbag
politician who will say anything to get elected. How in the world can anyone trust his word on anything? If Oilbama truly cared about America he would have supported Hillary and waited his turn as VP underneath her.

user-pic

Thanks for the comic relief! But you should probably mention the actual author of this, don't you think?

user-pic

Thanks - by the way, they have things called paragraphs now.

user-pic

Hmmmm. You haven't posted the actual author's name yet. Well, here it is: Scott Helman. And here's the link: The actual author....dembillc is such a poor troll that he steals other people's work

Plagiarism is such an ugly word, but there it is, clear as crystal.

No, no, no....he's not "Oilbama" anymore, he's "That One"....you need to try and keep up, sweetheart.

Some Weekly Standard tool on the Diane Rehm show this morning laughed off the criticism of the incendiary tone at the McSame/Falin rallies by saying that no one has more enthusiastic crowds than Obama.

The tool Juan Williams did, to his credit say, after much qualifying, that the tone had gone a bit far.

I don't know if they don't get it, or choose not to.

Doggoneit: It's all fun and games to them until someone loses an eye.

Andrew Halcro's blog has the following quote posted:

A lot of people are apathetic about campaigns because you see a lot of the garbage that goes on in campaigns and the personal attacks and the character assassinations that are so unnecessary,” she said. “They’re useless; they detract from the issues.” Sarah Palin, Fairbanks Daily News Miner Editorial Board Interview, 2006

I wonder what flavor would be suitable enough for her to eat her own words?

But, but, Obama is a uniter.

No fear. Right?

user-pic

And this from the person who said Obama supporters were starting to sound like Tawana Brawley....

Know your trolls, people.

McCain is pandering to the Timothy McVeigh wing of the fringe right. We should have seen this coming when he chose a veep candidate whose hubby is a member of what's basically a secessionist rightwing militia. Still, I'm surprised at just how far he's gone with this dangerous and divisive demonization.

Indeed--it's the fault of the "Impulsively Unreflective Duo"

From:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/impulsively-unreflective-duo-inmccain.html

The Impulsively Unreflective Duo In..."McCain Goes Negative"

In our last episode, we saw the indomitable, impulsive duo suspend the campaign to take on the Crisis on Wall Street! Now, watch, as, in our next episode...McCain Goes Negative!



McCain paces the floor in the Fortress of Irritability. He is cracking walnuts.

A walnut slips to the floor.

McCain: Damn nutcracker!

Sarah Palin is sitting in a chair at a desk. She is writing on a piece of paper: "J.M + S.P." This is then crossed out and replaced by "S.P. + J.M.". These alternating versions , the one before it always crossed out, continues down the page.

McCain: Well, the first plan didn't work. We tried to put them in a trance with the folksy ray, but they had their deflectors halfway raised. If only you hadn't called the commander in Afghanistan "McClellan"

Palin: But...didn't you say they were fighting a civil war, Sir?

McCain stops pacing, looks at Palin silently. He is smiling through tight lips but he is holding back anger.

McCain: "I think the time has come. We have to call in...Dr. Negative."

He pushes a large black button, which is the only button on a red phone on his desk.

Dr. Negative immediately bursts through the door. He is carrying flyers, masking tape; telephone wires are wrapped around his arms hanging in every way; a tattered copy of the book "Accusations of Fascism, Communism, Terrorism, Drug Use, Pedophilia, Islamism, Adultery, Pandeism, Cannibalism, Cubism, Miscegenation, and Spousal Abuse...for Dummies!" is rolled and stuffed in his left pocket, filled with bookmarks; he is dragging a Robocaller behind him, leashed to a chain.

Dr. Negative (quickly, eagerly): Did you hear? Obama was born in Bin Laden's subterranean bomb making factory, outside of U.S. lines. He was born on a pile of cocaine and dynamite--and the midwife was a Trotskyite!

McCain: Not yet, Dr. Negative. I want you to meet Sarah.

Sarah: Oh, we've already met.

Dr. Negative: That trooper went down! He poisoned the salmon milk at the Wasilla Bible school! With drugs made at a Leftist Satan worshiping collective! That you could see from Russia!

Sarah: You betcha'!

Sarah and Dr. Negative give each other a high five. Dr. Negative's telephone wires rattle on his arm as he does so, triggering the Robocaller, which starts playing "...illegitimate babies made in test tube factories in North Korea and sent to Chicago by Bill Ayers..."

Dr. Negative shuts off the Robocaller with an embarassed smile.

Dr. Negative: Just practicing.

There is a pause.

McCain: That's fine, Dr. Negative. That's fine. Because, now, I have a special job for you. An important one.

Dr. Negative leaps into the air with excited glee. As he does, detritus falls to the floor--buttons reading "Election Day: Remember, the 3rd Tuesday in November!"; business cards, reading "Push Polls Anonymous--We Call, They Fall" and "Mongers On Call-No Rumor Too Far fetched"; Bandaids with purple hearts; mangled and dirty chads.

Dr. Negative: A new job! A special job! Oh, Mr. McCain! I'm ready! I'm ready!

Sarah watches from her chair, filing her nails.

McCain: Now, Dr. Negative. You have to make him seem radical...

Dr. Negative quickly pulls a can out of his right pocket, emblazoned with the word "Radical" He opens the top. Red and Black snakes fly out.

Dr. Negative: (eagerly, expectantly, hungrily) Yes...Yes...

McCain: You'll have to start rumors that are so inflammatory that they will spread like wildfire, and that will be started too late to stop them with the actual truth...

Dr. Negative pulls a gigantic grinder out of his left pocket. It is labeled "Rumor Mill". He turns the crank a few times. Hamsters, syringes, and Peace symbols fly out.

Dr. Negative: Yes...Yes...

He is salivating.

McCain: They will have to be so incredible, so over-the-top, based on such tawdry and poorly sourced evidence, yet riddled with tempting minutia--bullet gauges, Google maps of supposed meetings and the like, that the right will eat them up, and start analyzing the minutia with adolescent glee.

Dr. Negative (Very calmly, matter of fact): Oh, that's easy. They'll eat anything.

Dr. Negative reaches into his back pocket, pulls out a manila envelope labeled "Minutia: So-called "Proof" for the Right". He empties it to the floor. Bullet gauge measures, outdated copies of Photoshop, paperbacks entitled "How to Use the Insane as Competent Witnesses", "The Faked Moon Landings! Roswell! And Other Believable Phenomena!" and "You TOO Can Be A Warrior--From Your Own Couch!" fall to the floor.

Sarah plucks out the "Faked Moon Landings" book. She starts reading.

McCain: We know how our girl loves to read.

Sarah stops, and begins fixing her hair in a hand mirror.

McCain: Now, Dr. Negative, there is one final task.

Dr. Negative: Yes, Mr. McCain?

McCain: It is very difficult. Very...dark.

Dr. Negative: (Leaning forward expectantly, his voice quivering with excitement): Yes, Mr. McCain, Yes?

McCain: You will have to play the card that they played against me. Do you understand?

The room becomes silent. Sarah stops looking at herself, and looks towards the center of the room where McCain and Dr. Negative are staring at each other.

Dr. Negative: You mean...(eyes widened with disbelief. His telephone wires are quietly shaking as he shivers).

McCain (nodding): Yes.

Dr. Negative slowly removes from his jacket pocket what seems to be an ordinary pack of playing cards. They are labeled "Joker" brand. He takes a penknife from his pocket, and slowly slices the covering cellophane. There is a slight and distant roar. He looks at McCain.

McCain nods.

Dr. Negative then slowly removes the red ribbon encircling the cellophane at the top of the pack. He inserts the penknife--holding it from it very farthest end--and flips open the top of the pack.

Smoke begins to pour from the top of the pack, thick, acrid smoke. It quickly fills the room, covering all that is in sight.

McCain (shouting amidst the sound of smoke rushing into the room): And remember--no fingerprints!

Next episode: The smoke is cleared.

Cite:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/impulsively-unreflective-duo-inmccain.html

You are pathetic.

im gonna start donating money to the mccain campaign everytime i see a head of state post

user-pic

What a great idea! I'm going to donate right now!

user-pic

Here's the specific page for donating to show the cost of negativity:

https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/costofnegativity2?source=20081008_JB_D2

user-pic

Sent money two nights ago in response to a Biden email about the negativity.

Hope it counts!

Me too.

The more negativity from McScum, the thinner my wallet...

25 days to go!

user-pic

Hewson, you are a miserable bastard and you have managed to make your fucking blog the most unpopular site on the web.

No body but nobody from here would think of clicking that fucking link.

Thief.

Hewson,

A link, and a brief excerpt, is all that is required. Stop wallpapering threads with your self centered rubbish.

user-pic
and waited his turn as VP underneath her.

Aha! I always suspected Hillary preferred to be on top.


Saddle up and ride, little pony!

Tena,

Not that there is anything wrong with that. Wink Wink, Nudge Nudge, Know what I mean aye, Know what I mean?

user-pic

O not at all.

I just looked at Hill and thought - "I bet she likes to be on top."

;)

Seems I was right.

Bless her heart!

user-pic

Yes, I've learned over time, liam, that guys really are lazy!

Y'all do love it when someone else wants to climb aboard and do the work!


LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

god thank you - I'm finally laughing instead of tearing my hair out.

let's not discount the years' long role that the media has had in stoking these smears and slurs against democrats. they've revelled in portraying dems as the 'other'. and now they're being directly targeted.

you reap what you sow.

and this will end in violence. just like the rnc is hoping.

Palin is starting to become a lotta dead weight for McCain to carry into the final few weeks before the election.


Lawsuit over Palin's e-mails gets under way today

ISSUE: Private e-mails on state business need to be public, ex-state worker says.

A lawsuit aimed at forcing Gov. Sarah Palin to preserve any private e-mails she wrote involving state business hits the courtroom today.

Former state employee Andree McLeod filed the suit a week ago. The goal, she said, is to make Palin retrieve e-mails from her private accounts that involve state business and make them part of the state's public records.

McLeod has filed a records request for the e-mails and other records. The lawsuit also calls on Palin to stop using private accounts for state business, she said.

ACORN thing is Republican "black advance"...they laid the groundwork for this back in the spring w/ press coverage to lay down thefoundation. The people who filled out those forms were likely Dallas-based operatives or college Republicans. This is the kind of thing they do. It has that Rove-ian Kabuki theater quality about it.

Where are both Clintons?! If they think they can lay low and wait for 2012 they're playing a dangerous game. And if the unthinkable happens, we're all in a heap of trouble -- Hillary won't be the first woman pres -- and probably never will be... the disaster from Alaska will have her stilleto firmly planted in Hillary's back.

They better get out there NOW and be loud.

Both Bill and Hillary are supposed to be campaigning with Biden this weekend. But, really, the Clintons are NOT the ones best suited to calm down the fury of the rabid right-wingers ... truly. ------ Respected Republicans (like -- maybe -- our SITTING PRESIDENT and his father the EX-PRESIDENT???, Senators like Hatch, Spector, etc.) need to step up. In fact, I hope they are doing so behind the scene, but it's getting to the point that they will need to do it publicly soon.

The trick is --- who would the Limbaugh/Hannity/Palin wing of the party listen to? If the Reps are going to lose the election, they probably plan to run those more moderate and responsible voices out of the party anyway.

Odd source to cite, I realize, but I keep thinking of a song from Beauty & the Beast


We don't like what we don't understand
In fact it scares us,
And this monster is mysterious at least.
Bring your guns, bring your knives,
save children and and your wives,
so save our village and our lives!
LETS KILL THE BEAST!

WHERES THE TROOPERGATE REPORT?

Copies have been distributed to the Alaska legislature etc, to be kept top secret, until later today, when it is expected to be made public.

The saddest part of all this is: The party of Abraham Lincoln has now become the party of Jefferson Davis.

Very astute observation.

And just goes to show that irony isn't always "delicious."

I am amazed at what they think they will get from whipping their core loyalist in to frenzy.

it seems as if they are not trying to win the election but succeed from the union.

if you are behind at the poll, and you are already getting 90% support from your party, why appeal to base. the whole thing does not smell right.

McCain is now employing the "save the village by destroying it" Vietnam tactic. he is not running to govern but to divide the country along party and racial lines. SAD, SAD, SAD

user-pic

Scorched earth.

But our campaign is now so well organized on the ground that we could easily raise up peace-loving leaders in every neighborhood.

I take comfort in that.

I don't know if anyone else has seen these, but in my borough, in Northeast PA there are now signs up in people's yard's reading "annoy the media vote McCain Palin".

!

user-pic

Then we need a similar campaign:

Bring back UNITY and CIVILITY

VOTE Obama/Biden

The only silver lining to the hateful flailing is that the McCain campaign is coming off as increasingly desperate. As I watch them on the news they appear to be completely unhinged, they know they are going to lose.

The scary thing is that there some wing nut out there whipping themselves into a froth. Secret service please pay attention.

user-pic

mcShame Campaign Deranged!

This is the time when we really miss Ted. He would have flailed the hide off of McCain and Palin for their fascist campaign tactics.

user-pic

We are the people we have been waiting for.

A populace gets the leadership that it deserves. If the voters elect McCain/Palin, then those voters will get what they deserve, and America will become the laughing stock of the entire civilized world.

user-pic

liam honey - that's not the way it works in a democratic republic with an electoral college. IF it was straight popular vote, I'd agree with you that you get what you deserve.

I don't think the cause and effect is that direct in our system.

The majority voted for Bush in 2004. How quickly you have forgotten.

Angry mobs that masquerade as McCain rallies.
Is this what they mean when they say "great Americans"? John, it's not too late to run as an anarchist.

user-pic

Dishonrable mcShame: anarchy first (nuclear option ☢)

user-pic

O shit, it is his nuclear option - you're right!

user-pic

Disarmament First!

user-pic

Won't be long before the McCain/Palin camp feebly argues: "These comments were made by individual citizens, not the campaign staff. They're just exercising their right to Free Speech."

An interesting contrast with how Obama handled an angry crowd booing the mention of Hillary Clinton's name at a campaign rally in Detroit.

When Obama took the stage, he reprimanded the audience for booing Gov. Granholm over Clinton, then went on an extended detour to praise his former rival.” “I want everybody here to be absolutely clear," Obama said. "Senator Clinton is one of the finest public servants we have in American life today. ...She is worthy of our respect. She is worthy of our honor. She is going to be at the forefront of bringing about change."

Obama’s ability and willingness to challenge his supporters to be civil during the heat of a political rally is the sign of a true leader. I can't imagine McCain rising above the frenzy to admonish his supporters like Obama did for Hillary.

Obama has integrity and virtue where McCain and Palin are fight just to gain acceptance.

In the Washington Post article linked to above, a woman named Joan Schmitz says she's "pissed off," and that she simply can't understand why Obama is climbing up in the polls. You have to wonder if she's looked in the mirror lately.

These "beer hall putsch" style antics will simply drive more and more moderate swing voters into the Obama column. Keep on screaming, my friends!

user-pic

I kinda hate to do this but I also can't resist:

Joan Schmitz???????????????


I mean, if you're going to be a Nazi, I guess it helps to have a German name.

Delightful and informative,,,, and scarey, offering from The Dish http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/the_unthinkable_1.php

The photo clinches the scariness.

user-pic

the pock-marked ugly faces...

Here's a great article about some Republicans jumping ship and joining the Obama team.

http://www.mlive.com/grpress/news/index.ssf/2008/10/former_governor_milliken_backs.html

So much impotent handwringing!

What Palin and McCain are doing is ILLEGAL. They are INCITING. They are engaging in HATE SPEECH. They are riling crazy people up to commit felony acts of violence against a sitting Senator and presidential candidate. They stand by while a black cameraman is subjected to racial taunts and further hate speech. The Secret Service is "investigating" while the criminals are speaking from the podium.

WAKE UP PEOPLE!!! Do we have to see a lynching on the evening news before somebody stops these two? They won't stop themselves - they are getting their evil rocks off on their hateful rabble rousing.

You want Hitler? vote McCain Palin.

user-pic

I wish Obama would call for a national demonstration of peace. It would involved people simply coming out of their houses to stand in their neighborhoods all over this country. To stand there quietly. Making it ever so clear that a huge, huge majority wants peace and calm and unity.

Google earth can take the photos. And we'll see a sea of people, standing for peace.

These idiots aren't the first Republicans to whip up some fear and hatred. Remember Pat Buchanan at the Convention in 1980, Reagan in Philadelphia, Miss, and so on...

Who is "hand wringing?" Biden and Obama both called them out on it specifically.

And this is America, where we have protected the right to be an asshole, and proclaim yourself one loudly. They haven't crossed the line to incitement unless they show an intent to influence people listening to commit the crime. That is a difficult standard, and for good reason. Until one of them says, "he shouldn't be allowed to get away with that", or "wouldn't it be nice if he weren't around?" There's no crime. In our free society, we punish people for ACTS. Punishing people for words they speak is the quickest way to destroy the America we are trying to protect.

What you are suggesting is rounding up people who express a viewpoint that is repugnant. That's a slipperly slope. By saying Obama "pals around with terrorists" they are making an unfair association. By asking "who is the REAL Barack Obama?" McCain is making an unfair charge that Obama is unknown and different. These are absurd, offensive charges. But these are not crimes. They are depsicable political tactics. Nothing more.

Not to minimize the potential danger to Obama, and the damage this kind of stuff does to the fabric of our society. I just don't want us to become what we abhor, which we have done such a good job of since 9/11.

I am outraged by what is going on. But what I love about our system is that people are making their own decisions on what is relevant, and the polls are showing it. There is a segment of the population that we will not be able to reach, and who will try to poison every second of an Obama Administration. But that has always been the case in America. The obstacles to progress can be defeated by the power of our votes, our attention, our hard work. On Nov. 4th we will prove that hopeful, serious and resolute Americans far outnumber those looking backwards, and hiding in their fear and hatred.

25 Days. More work to do. They will try to steal the election by any means necessary. We will keep working. The ground game is paying off. 40 offices in New Mexico. McCain has less than 10. Obama buying 30 mins of primetime to make his case in your living room, Biden in Missouri calling out McCain's cowardly tactics, Barack in Ohio speaking about the importance of "this moment".

This is happening. Keep the faith.

Tweety has actually been right on point about this issue all over MSNBC.

I will still say that I have seen quite a bit on MSNBC about this hate mongering. Yesterday, during the noon hour (central time), Andrea Mitchell talked w/Tucker Bounds about this and called him out on it. I sent an email to TPM about that interview. During Hardball, Chris Matthews did the same thing, but with a different Repub (I don't remember who). He's talked about this quite a lot.

user-pic

Editors of all newspapers need to address this ASAP. To condemn it in the strongest possible language!

Hold off on the Times. Some of the stuff you're asking them to write would belong in the editorial section. Not an article.

user-pic

To echo someone from a thread here the other day, seeing 'adult' and 'Republican' in close proximity in the same sentence smacks of an oxymoron.

user-pic

To echo someone from a thread here the other day, seeing 'adult' and 'Republican' in close proximity in the same sentence smacks of an oxymoron.

McCain has made an epic miscalculation. America is paying attention for the first time in a long time, and as we tune in, what do we hear? McCain talking about some guy named Willy Ayers, and telling us we don't know Obama, "that one". So as the economy is the worst in a generation, McCain is talking about the 1960's, and telling us we don't know that guy Obama, even though he been on our tv's yakking non-stop about who he is for the past 2 years.

I thought Hillary ran a crappy campaign, but this is ridiculous.

So... can I take the title of Greg's post as meaning the news organizations aren't doing the job, right?

Shame on them.

user-pic

This is where "balanced" reporting completely fails. What McCain and Palin are doing is an outrage, and they need to be called out. Balance is great, but the truth is better.

user-pic

McCain cannot even stand up to bullies at his own rallies. Palin is so busy trying to cover up her own ignorance she no longer allows anyone with intelligence to ask questions. She does the nasty things she's told to do very well because it fits so well into her nature.

McCain/Palin are rabble rousing and inciting a lynch mob mentality. They are setting up the neocon loonies to pull off their version of the "Brooks Brother suits" of confrontation to bash dems for the next four years. The more they can get people to hate the enemies they create the more motivated they will remain to their destructive cause.

The 27% cancerous closed minded hate filled bigots are not open to discussion or compromise and allow only points of view that agree with their already formed opinions or biased prejudice. They revel in their own ignorance and the only means of combating them is to educate and inform the remaining citizens. They are ruled by unregulated greed and blame damage.

McCain/Palin are promoting the same type of violence that has been promoted by Hannity, Coulter ,Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly...my god the list is huge. They have a long history of inciting violence. Example: The Arkansas democratic party leader shot to death in his office and the books of above mentioned were found in the assassin's apartment. The Unity church shooter just hated liberals.

McCain/Palin know exactly what they are doing. Next they'll burn black dummies hanging from ropes at their rallies cheering wildly at the site of destruction. REMEMBER: They are the minority. The real McCain has been exposed by Palin's pretense. They assumed the voters were too stupid to know when they were being manipulated and lied to and they were wrong. McCain has always been a con and Palin is a phony. The public started paying attention...before it was too late. Their only recourse now is to steal it or challenge the election and get a SC installment.

One day I will tell my grandchildren that republicans used to exist in great numbers until taken over by neocons and fanatics and unregulated greed caused them to wreck the country. (Sorry, I'm angry and had to vent...I'm done)

user-pic

If a Right Wing Nutball causes me fear for my safety, I can guarantee him instant "Rapture"

And now that you've demonstrated, in writing, premeditation and planning, you will probably be arraigned on murder charges if you do. Okay, he yelled at you first? We'll make it second degree.
Gun nuts are all the same Democratic or Republican.

You just go ahead and shoot at the next guy who challenges you politically. There isn't a better thing you can do for progressives, Denocrats or gun rights.

Maybe this is silly but with these kinds of tactics, do we really want PBS saying the country supports Palin?? At 1:00 p.m. CT, it was at 49/49.

"Please read and do quickly.

PBS has an online poll posted asking if Sarah Palin is qualified.
Apparently the Republicans knew about this in advance and are flooding
the voting with YES votes. Currently at 49% yes 49% no.

Results will be reported on PBS, picked up by mainstream media and can
influence undecided voters in swing states.

Please take 20 seconds and do two things
1) Click on link and vote yourself.
Here's the link: http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

2) Then send this to every single Obama-Biden voter you know, and
urge them to vote and pass it on.

The last thing we need is PBS having to say our viewers think Sarah
Palin is qualified."

What difference is it who said Oilbama and his Oilbamabots are all liars and scumbags?
The point is that "they" are 100% correct.

user-pic

PBS and NPR seem to be in a race to see how fast they can alienate anybody who might send them a contribution or subscribe. Maybe suicide was the logical next step for public broadcasting. Maybe it was just too good to live.

I think that news organaizations have an obligation to avoid faning the flames of these very dangerous sparks.

This is concerning on so many levels. At this point I don't know whether to be more fearful if Obama wins than if he loses. It's so disheartening to know that WE as a PEOPLE haven't really accomplished much as far as race relations in this 'great' country in our 200+ years of existence.

Sagacious Rambling a daily dose of my perspective

Who will have the first "Obama won, deal with it", stickers.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address