McCain Advisers Taking Ayers, Wright Off The Table?
As noted here and elsewhere, the words "William Ayers" appeared nowhere in yesterday's debate, despite the fact that the McCain campaign hinted for days that McCain would go hard at Obama's associations.
Now Politico reports that McCain advisers are privately indicating that Ayers, and Obama's pastor, Jeremiah Wright, may be off the table for good:
After days of attempts to persuade voters that Obama's ties to '60s radical Bill Ayers are a crucial character issue, McCain didn't mention Ayers' name during the 90 minutes of Tuesday's forum. His top aides suggested afterward that, going forward, the candidate wouldn't focus on the former domestic terrorist nor invoke the name of Obama's controversial pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
If it's really true that the McCain team is holstering this pistol, it suggests that the McCain campaign's internal polling on how the Ayers stuff is playing is just brutal, likely among independents. It also suggests that Obama's counter-attack -- lambasting McCain's campaign for wanting to change the subject from the economy to personal attacks -- has been effective.
Also: No more hits on Ayers or Wright will make for a lot of disappointed conservatives.
All that said, whether or not Ayers comes up again, the McCain campaign hasn't stopped with its strategy of painting Obama as a risky and vaguely sinister unknown. The campaign released an ad this morning asking, "who is Barack Obama?," and concluding, "Mr. Obama, we all know the truth."















Damage control. McCain is preparing to go quietly into that good night....
October 8, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
He may go.... but not into a good night. He will go down in Infamy - a Shame he richly deserves.
October 8, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
He may go quietly, but the rest of the republican establishment will not. They intend to raze the political landscape and make governance for the Democrats impossible. Expect obstruction, foot dragging and sandbagging at every turn. They have their marching orders: impede the Democrats at every point, make them look incompetent or worse and then, regroup to regain power in 2010 and 2012.
The focus on the downticket races has become critical and must receive consistent attention and resources if the Democrats are to enjoy any success in the next 2 to 4 years.
October 8, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign.
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
They're still at it. McCain's eating disorder spokesperson, Nancy Pfotenhauer, was just on MSNBC talking about Obama serving on a board with an unrepentant domestic terrorist who said some nice things about Hugo Chavez's education reforms and therefore Obama must also love Chavez.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does she have an eating disorder?
October 8, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is going to make the s#!% they did to Clinton look like kindygarden games. I'd sound paranoid if I predicted a coup attempt... but it won't be more than one standard deviation away from that.
October 8, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
October 8, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because, in the spirit of bipartisanship, the rules will be created giving the small Republican minority extra power. And in the same spirit, many Democrats will vote with the Republicans.
Playing to win isn't in the glorious bi-/post-partisan spirit that Obama and the village love so much.
October 8, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Totally agreed. The repubs don't give a damn about anything but their own self-interest, and the girlie-crats don't have the balls to push back. It's going to be a hard 8 years.
October 8, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think this depends on whether Dems can establish something close to a working super-majority this year.
Blue dogs notwithstanding, the Dem majority is - and has been - in a transitive state. It seems foolish to think that compromises that were necessary during this transitive time will continue when the Dems have the juice to squelch GOP opposition.
I think you will see that many Dems have been biding their time. The axes and clubs will come out after the election. There is definitely some revenge to be extracted. Bet on it.
October 8, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take Palin and this whole presidency thing off the table while you're at it!
McCain is losing it.
Oh, the webs we weave...
http://thetruthburns.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/the-tragedy-of-maccain/
October 8, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have a suspicion the adults in the republican party have told the baby to stop messing the living room
October 8, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
adults in the republican party....good one
October 8, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
This may be right. Okay, they lost this election. It happens If they wanna run candidates again some time in the future, they need to have some credibility. And not come off as fiends.
October 8, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's plain and simple. Obama pulled out the Keating Five gun, and McCain backed down. Bullying only works when the bully is not clobbered back.
October 8, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I frankly think that some in the republican party stepped in - to stop the hemorrhaging in the down-ballot campaigns. That and the Keating 5 nailed the coffin for him (is my guess).
October 8, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's probably true. Putting that 15 minute Keating-5 spot on the web probably scared them and got them thinking that they don't want that in TV ads in battlegrounds.
(This is assuming that there actually were no TV ads on this.)
October 8, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you're right.
October 8, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. There can be no doubt that, after 26 years of playing ball with the enemy, McCain is realizing he has a lot more to lose with this tactic than he has to gain.
October 8, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
The one wonders does this apply to the Babblecuda.
October 8, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
THOUGH one . . . I thought you guys promised us an edit function.
October 8, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's my question also: Is this just a continuation of the "good cop, bad cop" routine where McShame doesn't sully his own hands while Klondike Barbie slogs into the sewer? Let's see what she does today.
October 8, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boy is she dead meat.
October 8, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
The wingers see her as the new Reagan, who'll rescue them all in 2012 and bring in an era of good feeling. At least that's what they're saying today.
October 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Think Harriet Miers. Think Katerine Harris. The lady is done for!
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama does really well up through 2012, having already seen her Geraldine Ferraro impression, we may get to see her Walter Mondale impression.
October 8, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
You all seriously think Sarah Failin has a chance to win the GOP nomination? I don't. I think the GOPers aren't quite that stupid, and will recognize her as what she is - a big mistake that ought not be repeated.
Of course, if they can't get any quality candidates to volunteer to get landslided by an incumbent Barack Obama, she might get to go out of turn.
October 8, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
You all seriously think Sarah Failin has a chance to win the GOP nomination?
I agree with you. The very idea is ludicrous. Palin will be remembered as one of the worst mistakes in modern GOP electioneering, IMO.
October 8, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hell, she has to avoid that nasty mess in AK...
October 8, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes she is. Also I think the Secret Service might have a little talk with her about the crazies in her rallies.
October 8, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I saw someone holding a sign in one of the photos before/after the debate that said "Sarah, I can see the end of your political career from my house."
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
She has a hell waiting for her when she returns to Alaska.
October 8, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
When's she up for reelection? I suspect her attempt at bolting won't bode well for her.
October 8, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's got another couple years I think... but impeachment is on the table.
October 8, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect they didn't like being on the receiving end of similar stuff. Like the Alaska Independence Party. Like the Council for World Freedom. Like Keating 5. Like G. Gordon Liddy.
Hey John and Sarah: Sucks to be you.
October 8, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Word. When Obama uncorked a 13 minute documentary style video (high quality to boot), they had to know that he's holding back much more. Shit, my guess is that McCain had forgotten about the Council for World Freedom. And you know they have no idea about anything lurking in the Babblecuda's closet.
October 8, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
McDolt thought Obama's too nice, maybe? Surprise, surprise, surprise, tough guy.
The image of Palin having to slip back into Alaska in the dead of night is something I'm treasuring at the moment. Who knows? Maybe she'll be so persona non grata there she'll have to move. I hear Siberia's nice in January, and god knows the air fare from Anchorage would be cheap.
Say, isn't today the day the state Supreme Court is to hear arguments?
October 8, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
John goes into Infamy already. Sarah has to wait to be tarred and feathered in Alaska.
October 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
What's weird is that he's still a senator. It'll take years for him to be effective again, methinks.
October 8, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, they said the "candidate" won't say it...but what about the VP candidate?
October 8, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, yup. I have a feeling Palin is going to speak up about this the way she did when the campaign pulled out of Michigan.
October 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
You just can't pull that shit when you're viewed much less favorably than your opponent. It bounces off him and sticks to you. Obama raised his own net favorable rating even higher last night, and he will continue to be the only one who can successfully attack (he was more aggressive than I've ever seen him last night and the focus-group droids actually liked it.)
McCaint is totally screwed. He has no way to gain ground.
October 8, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
He'll try to turn around and reclaim some high ground, I think. But the air is way too thin up there for an old geezer. And he never really occupied it anyway.
Give him his thumb and his pampers.
October 8, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, Johnny Mac! Don't listen to them! The Ayers and Wright attacks are BRILLIANT! They're going to WIN THE ELECTION for you!
The Keating 5 stuff is going to kill Obama - people hate that negative shit.
Especially against a POW! Who knows how to get bin Laden!
And he'll tell us how - right after we elect him!
October 8, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why does the McCain campaign keep telling us what they about to do?
Is this the same things as talking out loud about tactics and strategy, as McCain says Obama has done regarding Pakistan?
It's as if they don't understand that we have this thing called the internet. It does two things well: Spreads information (sometimes to people you don't necessarily want to have know your tactic) and it stores the scumbag shit you've done in the past.
This is just the dumbest campaign ever.
October 8, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
See, when the elderly really lose it, they lose any comprehension of strategy. All you've got is tactics and loose lips.,
October 8, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it was an attempt to bait Obama into counter-attacking (which he kinda did with the Keating 5 vid). They were hoping Obama might lash out and look angry. They even had the Obama gets "angry" talking points lined up for McCain's stump speech on Monday. They had Cindy lined up to characterize Obama's response as "the most negative...". It was a carefully thought out plan (including the pre-notification that it was coming), it just wasn't effective and may even have been counterproductive.
October 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup. Glad it failed.
October 8, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Their internal polls were probably showing that these attacks were driving the undecideds to Obama.
October 8, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. It's not a white flag. But in the larger picture, it takes away they're only remaining talking point.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
October 8, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. I just hope someone told the Babblecuda. She seems to be out of the loop on these types of decisions and discussions.
October 8, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I frankly think mcShame will let her take the fall for him. But by throwing her under the bus, he'll find he's seeing her eyeball to eyeball.
October 8, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. There's nothing here that indicates Palin will and her hate rallies will stop. I think last night's debate shows that McCain is going to try to *finally* start talking about policy. I imagine that he is going to hit hard on the mortgage plan he advocated last night.
After hearing Axlerod on NPR this morning, I think the Obama campaign better be ready to speak more specifically about policy. I think McCain is going to get aggressive about talking about what exactly he will do, he will appoint, etc., and then attack Obama for being too wishy-washy. I'm an Obama supporter, and I thought Axlerod was way too wishy-washy this morning about how they will handle the economic crisis. That worked when McCain had nothing, but if Obama wants to sell himself as a strong leader and justify his lead in the polls, he needs to indicate strongly that he has a plan that he can implement starting Jan 09.
I think he can do that, but I don't think that's what he was anticipating having to do.
October 8, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Argh this was supposed to be in reply to das2003's comment. And of course it should read: "...nothing here that indicates Palin and her hate rallies will stop." Really wish we had edit.
October 8, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not to be a jerk, but "back in the day" we sort of edited our own work. But it's no big deal, your thoughts came through. That, in the end, is the goal of communication. The rest is just window dressing.
October 8, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do edit my own comments. I just made a last minute change to this one and neglected to notice the earlier "will".
Mistakes don't indicate a failure to edit or proofread. Mistakes are just that--mistakes.
October 8, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain can't talk about policies because he doesn't understand his own policies. As my wife said last night, she only understands what McCain is proposing because Obama translates.
And if we've learned NOTHING in this election (including the primary) is that the Obama Team knows what it is doing. If McCain wants to talk policy, I'm sure they are MORE than happy to do so. It's their bailiwick.
Now which topic do you think McCain has the superior proposals?
October 8, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think McCain has superior policies on just about nothing.
But I think it is dangerous to just assume that Obama talks about policy masterfully. He can get himself in trouble in such discussions. On the one hand, he can come off seeming vague, which raises independent voters' doubts. On the other hand, he can get wonkish and lost in his own answers, as we saw in the primaries.
This has been a strength of Obama's mainly because McCain has been atrociously abysmal at it. I think McCain's advisors are going to try to coach him hard at this stage to talk about one or two policy initiatives (like the mortgage negotiation plan), and then pretend that these are the magic bullets that will cure our ills and that he has the experience to get them done. That clearly was the tone of what he was trying to do last night. Will it work? Well, it is taking the campaign to Obama's turf, which is good on the one hand, but also means that Obama will have to show that he is far superior at that game. I don't think we should just assume he can do this, since he's not really had to yet.
I think it's easy in our bubble of Obama support to believe that McCain doesn't understand policy. I think that's because we think his policies are incredibly dangerous and bad for the country. But so far, every Obama campaign advisor I've heard since the debate has hemmed and hawed about how an Obama administration will actually handle the crisis. Since Obama is now the front-runner and most likely going to be the president, I think he needs to develop better answers about what his administration will look like and what he will do in the first 100 days. He is still not very strong on that point. If he seems to be wishy-washy on this stuff at this time, I do think he could lose some independents. Maybe not a sufficient enough percentage to lose the election, but I think it is foolish for us to just believe that Obama is going to continue to sway people merely because we insist McCain can't talk policy. (In fact, I'm surprised more people haven't pointed out that the reason McCain has been so bad is for the traditional reasons that senators often don't make good presidents. McCain is a senator through and through. He doesn't seem to have the perspective of a leader. But that's not the same as not understanding policy.)
The election's not over, and I'm surprised at how many people assume that it is. It is heavily in Obama's favor, but he will still need to close strong--which he didn't need to do in the primaries. I'm not as convinced as you that Obama's campaign can handle anything. It's been a very good campaign, but I think he needs a bit of a revitalization and a small change in strategy (one that acknowledges that he is almost certainly going to win) for the last 28 days.
October 8, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes good points, and the idea you mention further down in your post - that Obama needs to "develop better answers about what his administration will look like and what he will do in the first 100 days" - is also well taken. I think it would be a masterstroke for O to recalibrate his campaign message to this whole theme for the remainder of the campaign.
October 8, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama did a string of policy-heavy speeches right after the famous race speech. They got little air time because that kind of detail just doesn't excite people. Someone should find and link to all those, and perhaps Obama has on his website. I'd do it, but unlike most voters, apparently, I actually read. Obama has hundreds of pages of detailed pdf documents on policy specifics. No one reads them.
October 8, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Axelrod sounded really out of it on NPR--like a scared eighth-grader giving a speech in front of the class. I couldn't figure out whether he'd been awake for double-digit hours or had had some celebratory doobage after the debate, but he was simply not coherent or convincing in any way.
In other words, I don't think Axelrod's bumbling this morning equates to an Obama policy gap, just to Axelrod having a bad interview.
October 8, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspected this last night, when McCain didn't say a peep (even in the most general, generic terms) about so-called character issues as they relate to Obama. My guess then (and now) is that the campaign must have seen some internal poll numbers which indicated that the Ayres rubbish was backfiring disastrously, that nobody was buying it for a second.
Though I'm keeping in mind that, even if we never hear the names Ayres and Wright from now till November, that doesn't mean the McCain campaign is prepared to completely abandon the personal junk; they may attempt similar smears, but with different principals attached (Rezko). Not saying that will work (if they should even try it), only that I don't trust these people one iota to know what an honorable course is at this point, let alone take it.
October 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Next up: Diebold.
October 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Diebold machines are free to exercise their independent judgment.
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
On the few who fail to cast an absentee ballot instead.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh, I already voted, in the comfort of my kitchen (and with my computer right there for a little last-minute research on obscure propositions and judicial and state school board candidates.) I absolutely love "no-fault" absentee voting. I hope never to stand on line at a polling place again (though I suppose if the Rethugs get their hands on the Ohio Sec. of State's office again they'll probably abolish it.)
October 8, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just look what a Diebold machine did to Homer Simpson. That's "independent judgment". Not.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
We'll see. This campaign says a lot of things besides its prayers, as they say back in Kentucky.
This was going to be a respectful campaign. Wright was never going to be on the table in the first place. This was going to be a campaign about the issues, an honorable campaign run at a higher plain.
My point is that they've shown they are perfectly capable of having Palin continue to throw this dreck out to the rabble in the base while McCain and his surrogates insist with a straight face that they've taken it completely off the table. They may even be counting upon people like John King and Wolf Blitzer to obediently repeat their claim that they have without refutation, notwithstanding the footage of Princess Starburst Sprinkle spewing it out to the base that they showed five minutes earlier.
In fairness, however, I've got to say that if that's McPowlin's plan, they were not listening to John King last night. Apparently CNN--including the Republican commenters--moved out of the abuser's house and filed for a restraining order yesterday. It remains to be seen whether they'll succomb to the inevitable conciliatory sweet talk from the abuser that always follows the violence this time, but I'd say its at least even money they won't.
October 8, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
So they say they're not going to talk about Ayers or Rev. Wright, eh? Notice there's no mention of Tony Rezko. Get ready for a full on Rezko-thon, my friends! What else have they got?
October 8, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Both the prosecution and the defense have filed motions for Rezko's sentencing date to be delayed until after the election. Not sure what's slowing them down but the judge is sure to grant it. So that particular late October road-bump is gone.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read that the reason they are delaying sentencing is that Rezko has begun cooperating.
October 8, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McCain campaign is so blind. And tone deaf. And unfeeling. And unthinking. And tasteless.
That leaves one sense, left. The McCain campaign simply smells. And even there, everything seems to pass the sniff test, to them. It's like they are in a sensory deprivation tank.
October 8, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
You nailed it, c4Logic. You get an A+.
October 8, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
When I heard McCain's threat to go negative during the debate, it sounded like a bluff to me. I figured they were just setting Obama up, hoping Obama would go negative so McCain could appear the reasonable victim of the angry black man. Didn't work. Obama is always reasonable, and he can adapt to the situation without effort. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.
October 8, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree totally. They were hoping to rile Obama and make him look angry see my post above on this thread.
October 8, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, this is excellent news for John McCain?
No?
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
KeatingEconomics.com was well-done and well-timed; the perfect bitch-slap, if you will. McCain probably thinks that if he backs off on Ayers and Wright, the Obama campaign will do likewise with the Keating references.
The difference is, one approach is blatant slime, manufactured of thinly stretched and incessantly spun association.
And the other is history.
Keep it up, Barack.
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
That video will live forever on the web.
October 8, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
The best run Democratic campaign since Johnson in 1964 had that video and the website in the drawer weeks ago, ready to fire the minute McCain decided to play the guilt by association game.
The worst run Republican campaign since Bush I in 1992 never anticipated that Obama's campaign would have the Keating 5 bomber gassed up and on scramble alert, because they themselves wouldn't have been ready to do likewise had Obama fired first.
October 8, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's nothing, nothing I would like better than for GOP deadenders to pin their 2012 hopes to Palin.
October 8, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
For a party that is already splitting, it would take them out for at least another 8 to 16 years.
October 8, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I also think the fact that the networks and the rest of the MSM are picking up on the story of the "angry mob" outbursts that were the result of this campaign strategy don't help either.
Last night Chuck Todd mentioned this before the debate and noted that the story was just beginning to "gel," intimating that we would be hearing more about it in the next couple of days. No matter what, it's not good to look like you're leading a Klan rally.
And finally, Joe Biden is back today. Remember that Palin was able to get all that sludge out without her counterpoint hitting back. That ends now.
October 8, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did you watch The Daily Show last night? He had coverage of the hate rallies and mixed in a video from an old movie with a bunch of villagers carrying torches - like a hunt for frankenstein or something. It was hilarious.
October 8, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, I recorded it so I could watch the pre-debate stuff. I'll watch it (and Colbert) later today! Interesting that everyone's impression seems to be the same; i.e. inciting a mob.
October 8, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not be naive here. The McCain campaign may be suggesting that Ayers and Wright are off the table, at least for now, but don't rule out the 527s and the RNC still going for the jugular.
October 8, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Idiots who believe this is true, raise your hand?
I bet we'll hear Ayers on the trail or in an ad or from a surrogate on TV in the 2-3 hours.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I mean, in the next 2-3 hours
October 8, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
"wouldn't focus on the former domestic terrorist nor invoke the name of Obama's controversial pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright."
So instead they might show blurry pics of Ayres and refer to Wright as "that crazy black preacher who hates America."
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'll continue to believe that the reason McCain didn't bring this stuff up last night is because he's too much of a pussy to do it to Obama's face.
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I keep thinking that as mcShame moved in sometimes way too close to the audience last night, he could see how many cringed away from him. I keep thinking he had this dead audience for the most part. But Obama had them. Obama respected them, didn't move in too close like mcShame did. Obama soothed them, calmed their nerves. mcShame just shriveled up and sounded like a broken record - of LP days.
October 8, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Partly that he's a coward, yes.
But also, the town hall format does not lend itself well to attacks. It'd scare the shit out of the audience, whose faces were in plain view of the cameras. Crowd reactions speak very loudly, and they would have registered disgust at McCain's attacks.
Obama, of course, would have played it cool.
October 8, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not off the table. McCain's skinny, blonde flack just mentioned it on MSNBC. And she added to it, talking about Ayers' radical education agenda and praise of Hugo Chavez, "one of the foreign leaders who hate America."
October 8, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
We'll know after Caribou Barbie's speeches today if Ayers is off the table.
October 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup. I wouldn't count the chickens until the Moose Queen gives a stump speech today.
October 8, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is toast. And the reason why is the same reason why Clinton lost, because Obama really is that good.
He's like Ichiro. I've always liked Ichiro. Watched him here in Japan before he went to Majors. But I never saw him live and in person until last year at a game in Baltimore. And, he really was that good.
Obama is the same. I've never seen him in person but sure he would impress the same way. His campaign is a masterpiece. Seriously, there is no way he should even be here. Clinton should have never lost. And now, he's waxing McCain. Unreal.
Daring to hope here in Japan.
And the debate meant nothing to me. I voted for Obama in Oregon by mail last week.
Landslide, baby, landslide.
October 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
i don't think "taking it off the table" matters at this point. they've brought it up, given people the answer, and now all they have to do is continue to ask the question: who is the real barack obama?
taking ayers off the table is like saying at thanksgiving we took the turkey off the table.
October 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting analysis.
October 8, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"KeatingEconomics" was also brilliantly named. It's an attack that's still nominally about the economy. Can't say that about Ayers or Wright. Mr. Miyagi nods with approval.
Anyway, the whole "Honor after polling" move is, as Carole King would sing, "Too late, baby, now it's too late."
October 8, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. The Obama campaign focused on the significant economic implications of the corruption and tied it well with today's crisis. The approach was a far cry from the sloppy Ayers attack, which depended on the repetition of the over-exploited word "terrorist."
October 8, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Allen at governmentality blogged about this before and after the debate. I thought his take was interesting.
If he's right, the Ayers/Wright stuff will start appearing again in the next day or two.
http://www.governmentalityblog.com/my_weblog/2008/10/pre-game-why-no-ayers-or-wright-tonight.html
October 8, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "conservatives" were already bitterly disappointed when McCain started rambling on about running around the country and taking over broken mortgages. You saw it in the insta-dial polls and you read it on Free Republic last night.
In any case, with regard to Ayers, the Obama campaign should have a response by now that goes something like this. "You know, there are lots of McCain donors who served on that board with Barack Obama and served on that board with Bill Ayers. And by attacking Obama for serving on this board -- which is what you're doing -- you're attacking the Annenberg Challenge itself, and you're attacking good schools."
October 8, 2008 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Greg:
Did it ever occur to you Politico regularly pimps for McCain?
October 8, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd say you're misreading this one. First, it wasn't a pistol. It was vomit. Sarah Palin puked all over the table at a nice dinner party and even if someone cleans up the mess (and no one will) there's still that nasty stain to remind everyone of what just happened. And there's the lingering stench. They can afford to drop it. The damage is done. Palin's spew will be with us until election day. And I don't believe McCain's internal polling on how Ayers is playing is what caused them to drop the issue. I think it's McCain's internal polling on how Keating Five would play. McCain took a shot at Obama. Obama responded by firing a big fucking cannon over McCain's bow. I think McCain got the message.
October 8, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
We will get 400 EV'S if we face Palin in 2012, she is just TOO far to the right and once that election goes to issues and not character, she would be TOAST.
October 8, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Repubs have done some stupid stuff in the past but they're not dumb enough to nominate her in 2012. More likely, it'll be Newt Gingrich or some acolyte thereof. The voting down of the bailout bill was a seed for the future.
October 8, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama warned him, by the way: "If you keep telling lies about me, I'm gonna start telling the truth about you."
October 8, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Today's NY Times editorial got all this just right.
October 8, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Link is below. They nailed it!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/opinion/08wed1.html?ref=opinion
October 8, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Expect the next internal e-mail from Palin to the campaign managers on knocking off the Ayers stuff: "Aw, do we have to?"
October 8, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain and Gov Plain has a rally at 12:30 EDT. I will be watching to see if either one of them talkes about Ayers or Wright. If they dont then its off the table.
October 8, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Second'd.
October 8, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Has someone told Sarah Palin this?? Reports from Strongville, OH have her rallying AGAIN about Ayers just this morning!
October 8, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
SHE can do it at no cost to herself because she's busy cultivating her image among the slavering wingnuts- she's not worried about turning off everybody else. She doesn't give a damn what it does to the ticket's chances- she simply doesn't give a rat's ass about the old man. It's all about her 2012 fantasies for herself.
October 8, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had a look at and saved a video made by a reporter questioning participants at that rally. What a bunch of uninformed moronic rednecks. Makes me ashamed to say I'm from Oh. It is very depressing to know their votes will impact disasterously upon my life. Very sad indeed!
October 9, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt internal polling had anything to do with the pullback on Ayers (and Wright redux had not even begun yet). In the 5 daily trackers out so far today (with Gallup still to go), McCain gained 3 points in Battleground, 2 points in Rasmussen, and 1 point each in Kos, Zogby, and Hotline. The trackers were all pre-debate.
The debate was a draw on substantive points with Obama winning stylistically so it was a plus for Obama. McCain said "my friends" to the point it was cringe-inducing.
October 8, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Correction: I just saw Battleground myself anrd there is no change -- still Obama up by 7. A commenter on fivethirtyeight.com gave a false report of the Battleground numbers for today saying it had gone down to four.
Note: On YouTube you can check out videos of rallies filmed by average voters; they are interesting to watch and you get a realistic view of the events.
October 8, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are 2 rival versions of today's Battleground numbers -- even on links to the Battleground charts themselves. So take your pick -- tpm reports O+7 and pollster.com reports O+4.
October 8, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Final version now fixed on tpm -- Battleground (GWU) shows a 3-point Obama drop to a 4-point lead.
The RCP average right now is O+4.7. We'll see in a couple days if this is meaningful or just a fluke. McCain gains might be mainly in deep red states having no impact on the electorl college.
October 8, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Their internal polls supposively were far worse than the public polls in Michigan, which led them to choose that state to pull back. Plus you cite national tracking polls, whereas my guess is that their internal polls were focused on swing states, like VA OH and FL.
October 8, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
the mccain campaign is so stupid it makes hillary's campaign look good. is obama responsible for outing both of them as inept? or is he just lucky to run against such erratic and bizarre opponents?
October 8, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think both "my friends" and "fundamentally" are used about the same.
It could be like the Roxanne drinking game, one team drink on Roxanne, the other on Red Light.
I swear, next debate, I'm getting someone else, a bottle of tequila and turn a boring debate into a fiesta!
October 8, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I played a virtual drinking game last night during the debate - every time McCain let out a "my friends," I yelled, "SHOT!" I think I got up to 12 or 13 (and I was out of the room for a bit so I may have missed a few).
October 8, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Careful. Those damn kids will be walking on you and your lawn if you keep those games up.
October 8, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
20 "my friends" by my count. I didn't know McIIIrd had so many friends.
October 8, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden live in Florida HERE in a short while.
Lets give ol' Joe some support. :)
October 8, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
One might expect that McCain might try and go all honorable the last four weeks, pulling the old "I made a mistake and I apologize my friends" gimmick that has served him well many times during his political career.
October 8, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mike,
You should include the "thumbs up" maneuver to the drinking game. I once thought sticking the thumbs up was a cliched move only done my crotchety old politicians in bad movies...hey wait, that totally describes McCain's camapign!
October 8, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd prefer to think this is because they don't want to make definitive policy statements or commit themselves on courses of action when the crisis itself is still very fluid and unpredictable. Doing so could easily backfire even three weeks from now.
Regardless, I agree it's too soon to pop the champagne corks. Look at what hubris has done for the GOPers.
October 8, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that this is why they aren't doing it. But that doesn't make it a good campaign strategy at this point. I just don't see a lot of low information voters convinced by "We need to see what the conditions are like in January" or "We don't want to disturb the markets during a delicate time." While I think that stance is reasonable, I think it can sound evasive. My suspicion is that McCain's internals demonstrate that independent voters remain concerned about exactly what Obama plans to do.
If McCain pushes him on this question--like it seems he is now planning to do--AND if McCain seems to forward an aggressive first 100-days agenda (two big "if's"), I think it might reinforce voter uncertainty about Obama. This might be a way that McCain can go after this "what do we really know about him?" question without bringing up ad hominem/guilt by association attacks. (It seems he's saving those for Palin hate rallies.)
I also think, again, Obama's focus on long-term initiatives was more suitable when the race was close and world markets weren't in turmoil. As Obama pulls more clearly ahead, I do think he should begin to be clearer about his short-term plans.
October 8, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the reaction to Palin's "this is a person who sees America differently than you and I", falls flat with most, and is downright offensive to many others. My own gut reaction to her is that she's just wrong, Barack sees America just like I do, and he has spent almost 2 years proving it to me every day.
Palin, on the other hand, arrives on the scene a few minutes ago. We know very little about her except that she's a "pitbull with lipstick", and sure enough, she starts clawing and biting at Barack's ankles almost immediately. How absurd. She's a wind-up toy, sent out to whip up the crazies.
And McCain? A once proud man reduced to being a coward and a fraud. He didn't bring up the "character" issue in the debate?! What? Just showing again what a sham his campaign has become, he doesn't even have the balls to bring it up, and attempt to "turn the page" on the financial crisis. Why not? Because America isn't buying bullshit political narratives right now. The country is broken, and Obama's "radial associations" aren't the solution to anything. Finally, the way he and Cindy ran out of there last night, while Barack and Michelle mingled for 20 minutes with the audience, was a perfect ending to another strong night for Barack.
Sorry wingnuts, America is sitting in their living rooms, and they are getting comfortable with the idea of that black guy, Barack Hussein Obama, as the next President of the United States.
October 8, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
With apologies, "radical associations", not "radial".
October 8, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain trying to save face, and face the growing reality of finishing his career as a senator.
Will he also pry the hatchet out of Sarahs hands? She has become a political freak show of sorts, a cross between Bob Dole and David Duke. If she attempts to run in 2012 all that has come out about her will then be used against her by her own party.
October 8, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Which ought to tell you that she can't run for president in
'12 or any time.
No one will back her and you don't just step up and say: I'm running for president. You can, but you won't get anywhere. You have to have the backing of money and political power and she has neither and never will.
She's going to become totally obscure again when this is over.
October 8, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, what a thought. I'd never even considered that she would even try again. Tena, you're right, that would be funny.
October 8, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, ABCnews is talking that Palin is considering impersonating Tina Fey on SNL to diffuse the impersonators a bit. It probably would be awful for the McCain campaign, but good for her future career as a funny media hack.
October 8, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she does that - she's going to fall as flat as a pancake.
That's a terrible idea, really.
October 8, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me neither - but other people keep bringing it up - they are saying she's trying to set the stage.
I don't think so. She's in trouble in Alaska in the first place.
In the second place, running for president is not anything like running for Miss Alaska. And that's her level - she cannot get higher on the scale. Apparently since Alaska, like Texas, has a kind of do-nothing governor it doesn't matter.
It really does on the national stage.
October 8, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Her becoming a governor is nothing short of phenomenal. Her becoming vice president was pretty much a winning lottery ticket that she found on her front lawn. I think, if she survives her AK legal problems, the rest of her life will be milking this.
Why take on more responsibility when you can go on the talking circuit? Be a guest speaker on Fox? Enjoy hunting trips? But make no mistake, she will be comfortable and rich after this.
October 8, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Fox is her speed - that's what she got that degree-by-mail in.
She'd be a great Fox talking head - send her over there to partner up with Karl Rove- it would serve both of them right!
October 8, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poor Sean Hannity - he's been trying to spin Bill Ayers into something all year. Perhaps his head will finally explode, thereby putting all of us out of his misery.
October 8, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you believe the McCain campaign is giving up character assassination you believe he suspended his campaign until the financial crisis was solved.
October 8, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
No - he's just going to bear down on one thing:
You can't vote for him - he's black for god's sake!
I really didn't realize the depth of McLame's racism.
October 8, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Following conversation between two aging boomer spouses (marriage sanctity certified) this morning in a household near me.
Hubperson You know there is a gender gap in our literature experience. Since I read a lot of WWII novels with a naval setting I thing there is a word to describe the disdain you noticed McCain displayed toward Obama last night.
Wifeperson: "Messboy?"
H: No gap.
October 8, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
With the polls starting to tighten again since they started with the Ayers connection, the McCain/Palin campaign will continue to pound it. The Obama/Biden campaign has to find an effective way to counter it and quickly. Pointing to the Keating 5 will not be enough.
October 8, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Morning guys. It seems obvious that the media narrative going in to the debate was pretty contemptuous of McCain/Palin's latest slime. That had to be disturbing for McCain.
I agree with others here who have pointed out that McCain's internal polling was probably showing a net loss on the attack tactics. Also, Obama's decision to bring a gun to a gun fight - with the Keating 5 play - is probably throwing the McCain campaign for a major loop.
I think McCain in particular, but Republicans generally, are completely blown away by this Dem opponent who not only won't be bullied, but also - inconceivably to them - intends to tear off their arm and beat them to death with it.
On a side note, I found a most intriguing comment by NotSoBlueStater over on Redstate this morning. It is quite surprising, and really is worth a quick look:
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/oct/08/back-to-the-salt-mines/#c50567
October 8, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
It makes one think that if McCain loses this thing, much of the angst/hate of the Repub party will be directed towards him, far worse than what the far right was trying to do during the primaries and in 2000.
Maybe they'll hold rallies in November where Palin accuses him of being a terrorist.
October 8, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, speaking as a self-centered dilettante, that amused the hell out of me.
LOL
October 8, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
OT but my wife sent me this flow chart. It's pretty funny.
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m285/mellis28/SarahPalindebateflowchart.jpg
October 8, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice.
The Keating economics 13 minute documentary has over 1 million views already on youtube.
October 8, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am with those who respond to this theory with an "I will believe it when I see it." Not only are we accustomed by this point to a certain duplicity in the McCain camp ("honorable" John decrying bad behavior, but "unable to restrain" his surrogates), but more to the point, as noted above
This is one of the great understatements of the century. Alongside world-class inanity about "elitism" (can anyone name an issue less significant than whether one pronounces "Pakistan" with a long or a short "a" sound?), the conservative netroots are sharks-in-a-feeding-frenzy excited about a campaign centered around Obama's connections to Ayers. At this point, McCain's campaign probably has to pursue that line of attack simply to keep his base on board.
October 8, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me too.
But I also think maybe the Obama Camp's shot across the bow - the Keating 5 documentary, was meant to show McLame what was going to happen if he kept on this track and I think he got scared.
October 8, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think one can ascribe a Politico report of off message babbling from an unnamed McCain aide to McCain suffering fear from a Keating 5 video on the Internet. Ambition drives McCain.
Incompetence plagues his campaign.
October 8, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't take my opinion from Politico - I just thunk it up myself!
;)
October 8, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
When I first noticed the World According to Limbaugh back in the early years of the Clinton presidency I was struck by the degree of rage the right could generate over the personna of the President and First Lady, and how it seeped into
their views of everyone remotely connected to them.
They are in a rage over Obama and his wife. Ayers and Wright are living proof to them that Obama is evil. They cannot give that up of they give up life itself. (There are, of course, many on the left with similar personality disorders.)
October 8, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, look, ricky - Rush Limbaugh was the most visible sign of a blacklash that was on the way and we all should have seen it and didn't. I didn't - I ignored Rush and all those lunatics - I didn't think they'd ever amount to anything.
They amounted to a 12-15 year backlash against the 60s, basically.
That's over - we're swinging back to the left. It was a blip - these last 12 years have been one step back to all the steps forward we were making and will continue to make - this blip has burst.
October 8, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, but the whole world view of the right (and some on the left) is based on seething anger and resentment. That is not a bubble that bursts. It is a disorder.
October 8, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, but they are going to have to take that anger and sit on it - no one is interested any more.
Things go back to the way they used to be - the religious right and the extreme rightwing go back to being people who mutter imprecations while they're walking down the street.
October 8, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seething rage and hatred is a characteristic of the Right, not the Left. You apologist. Every time McCain or Palin does something wrong or racist you claim "the other side does it too." I am tired of this weak argument ascribing the weaknesses of your side to both sides to justify them. The hatred of the Right far exceeds the Left in volume, intensity and sheer quantity.
October 8, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
As one post here noted, McCain spokeswoman Nancy Pfotenhauer was continuing to hit the Ayers stuff hard this morning during the 9 o'clock hour on MSBNC. I didn't take notes, but she either said that Obama was "hanging out" or "hanging around" with Ayers. Which is pretty close to Palin's "palling around" over this past weekend.
October 8, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. And in the world of the right Nancy Pf will later be smeared for being the only McCain person to not boycott MSNBC. In fifteen years she will be charged with 'pallin' around with that lesbian radical Rachel Maddow.
October 8, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have a slight different take on why McCain abandoned Ayers reference. I think he did that primarily because we were able to notice and point out racial undertone attached to it. Secondly, the intended outcome aside, he wanted to minimize his patronizing attitude, for which he was criticized much in the aftermath of the 1st debate and his defeat was largely attributed to it, at least that was their assessment. To a degree, I agree with Pat Buchanan's last night's assessment, of course with some qualification, that there is a little bit good left in McCain, even if that is self-induced and imaginary, that conflicts with the GOP's traditional last minute vile gutter approach. Thirdly, only thirdly, he sensed what was coming his way, Keating 5 and Council for World Freedom, of which he did not want to be reminded.
Will Ayers reference vanish? Probably not. He'll remain in the background, visible enough but not to overshadow McCain's 3 billion plan. Palin will continue to do the dirty job; McCain will try to sound like he's the one to fix economy with his plan of buying "the mortgages of homeowners."
Just now, as I was about to post this, AP writes, "John McCain and Sarah Palin plan to return to familiar criticism of Barack Obama's friends and supporters."
October 8, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Based on what I've read about McLame there was never any good in the man - he has always been spoiled, self-centered to the utmost degree possible and completely blinded to his own fucking inabilities by his ambition.
Furthermore, he hates everyone and always has - he absolutely despises women and always has.
He's a worse person than George W Bush. Buchanan doesn't know shit from shinola.
October 8, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena,
I agree with you.
You missed, "little good...even if that is self-induced and imaginary."
October 8, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden's back! Biden's back!
October 8, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boy is he! I even liked the Catholic epiphany reference to MsCain's economic switch.
October 8, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saw that. Beautiful. Man, what a great pick for VP, huh?
October 8, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does this mean the Democrats' bitch slap approach to GOP attacks is actually working this time?
October 8, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's talk turkey!
Does anyone know where that old chestnut came from and what it means?
October 8, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chestnut trees died. Let's not blame man. You betcha. We can find other nuts. How about ACORNS?
October 8, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Put me down in the "I'll believe it when I see it" column. I think Ayers/Wright are "off the table" in the same way that McCain "suspended his campaign".
October 8, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is all pure bs bait & switch tactics. I wouldn't trust any thing the repugs say or leak to people like Greg.
Embarracuda has been unleashed and that pig with lipstick ain't going back to pen now.
October 8, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just don't trust McCain or his campaign. I do however have to say that I think that John McCain, his wife and his running mate, are living in the realm of low information and thought deprivation
October 8, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they take this off the table what will they do? I don't think this is off the table yet, no matter how poorly it's playing with independents.
What can they talk about?
Obama is bulletproof right now. I think their next move will be to latch on to any moderate foreign crisis that develops and try to swing attention back to McCain's expertise. But seeing as how the Georgia/Russia thing hasn't really helped McCain, I doubt it will work...
For everyone sick of the Ayers rumors: http://www.digitalfuntown.com/videos/97
October 8, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with the people who think that "off the table" means about the same as "suspended his campaign". We'll keep hearing about the good Rev and Ayers.
The McCain campaign got part of what they wanted - the MSM covering the slime for lots of free advertising.
They appear to have not gotten the rest of what they wanted - a big, swift flip of the voters to McCain.
They also got something they didn't want - the MSM pointing a finger at *McCain* for rolling it out, far more so than at Obama for his "associations".
So *McCain* will back off to claim the high road.
The surrogates will keep using it. Be it Palin or Hannity or the push polling caller or the e-mail spammers. It will be out there a lot, with the McCain camp hoping it imbeds into certain people's minds in certain areas of the country that it could, and likely will, play to.
In a sense, almost a mass blast advertising campaign.
The media frankly is willing to believe that McCain himself will be taking the high road by personally taking it off the table. You could see it even last night that they were giving him some credit for not bringing up Ayers. A pat on the back for being uncomfortable with it.
I tend to think it probably wasn't that (i.e. McCain uncomfortable with it), and instead ties into comments that Josh was pointing to after the first debate and McCain's unwillingness/inability to look Obama in the face and make eye contact.
He couldn't bring himself to sling it at Obama face to face. In a sense, he "broke" again last night.
McCain's anger and contempt are less aimed at Obama than at himself. He's too delusional to see it, but deep down that's what it is.
John
October 8, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did anyone really believe this disingenuous (read: "lying") crap from the McCain campaign?
They couldn't even keep up their charade for a few hours. For a campaign that "going forward ... wouldn't focus" on irrelevant nonsense like Ayers, the McCain camp's decision to put out a press release ending with "Barack Obama's friend tried to kill my family" sure is an odd way of doing that.
www.thepage.time.com
October 8, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Going forward, Team Obama should still be on the alert and should fight back as promptly as possible. A few things from yesterday's debate that Team Obama should focus on and play up:
- the lack of novelty of McCain's mortgage rescue plan --- essentially he has just stolen Democrats' idea.
- Obama should clarify or play up his own record, especially his tax votes, his bipartisan record and his energy bill vote.
- time to play up his star team --- economic advisors and foreign policy advisors, seek more endorsements from foreign policy and national security heavyweights, and float likely picks for treasury sec, secretary of state, defense secretary and national policy adviser. The credibility of his likely foreign policy team is important for pre-empting any October national security surprise.
- talking about October national security surprise, it's time to start linking Osama bin Laden's video right before the Nov election in 2004 to George W Bush's re-election as well as our continuous foreign policy disaster and our new economic disaster, and promoting the conclusion that Osama bin Laden loves neoconservatives and loves to see our economy bleed. In fact, I think they just said that they love seeing the West in financial crisis.
October 8, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
All this means is that they will now let the 527s go after the nasty guilt by association stuff so they can claim plausible deniability.
October 8, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
The damage is done. They introduced the idea, albeit thin, that Obama "pals around with terrorists." They don't need to bring it up again. It gives the appearance that they are waging a less brutal campaign if they back off. Unfortunately, idiots will hear it and believe it's the "gospel." Very few people that I know will actually look into this accusation to see if it holds water. The conservative right wing sows the idea, then lets the public run with it whether its true or not. It "fits" their idea of Obama. Why bother to think anything different? This "hit and run" tactic works very well. I just hope most are smart enough to see it as desperation from a party that would sell its soul to the devil just to win.
We have lost our ability to think and must get back to a point where we don't buy everything we hear and see on TV.
Bush sold the American public on Iraq. Well, most anyway. The scare tactic worked well. Remember the nice color coded threat level? Surprised they have not used it again. Of course, it ain't over yet. I wouldn't put it past the Republicans to stage a small scaled terrorist event to distract attention at the very end. I don't trust these folks at all.
October 8, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
This hit and run attack would have worked better in 2004, not so much in 2008 when people have lost their jobs, IRA values, healthcare benefits and soon, their homes. The Racist Right 10% will always lap it up but not the other 40% of Republicans who could swing the election.
October 8, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
For everyone's sake, I hope you're right. I believe we are paying more attention this time around, but I still hear folks (this morning) talking about McCain's performance in the debate as being superior. WTF? I'd like to think that a mere 10% of the right wing would still vote republican no matter what, but I live in Texas where men are men and sheep run scared. Heads are hollow in this state!
October 8, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautifully written Dorn. You have no place in John McCain's America.
October 8, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect we will see more of Ayers, Wright and Rezko the week before election day. It's too early today for the McCain camp to use them without Obama being able to mount an effective counterattack.
October 8, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain is running dirty ads about who Obama is and just figuring out the American people are more interested in the economy?
Maybe that's because John McCain is a rich boy.
Check out: http://samemccain.blogspot.com/2008/10/economic-recovery-via-beer-heiress.html
October 9, 2008 7:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Got a plug-in error for the Biden live bit; found this from :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT06ucZ3bc4
At the end, Biden quotes Bob Casey:
"You can call yourself a Maverick, when all you've been to this President is a Sidekick."
October 9, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink