GOP Rep. Caught Saying "Liberals Hate Real Americans," Fibbing About It
Looks like another Republican has been caught making the "Real America" slur against liberals -- and then trying to fib his way out of it.
At a McCain rally over the weekend in North Carolina, Rep. Robin Hayes (R-NC) -- who is in a very tough race against Democrat Larry Kissell -- reportedly told the crowd: "Liberals hate real Americans that work and achieve and believe in God."
A spokesman for the Hayes campaign categorically denied that Hayes said any such thing. But then this audio of Hayes saying exactly that began to circulate:
Confronted with the audio, Hayes fessed up in a statement: "I genuinely did not recall making the statement and, after reading it, there is no doubt that it came out completely the wrong way. I actually was trying to work to keep the crowd as respectful as possible, so this is definitely not what I intended."















What an idiot!
October 21, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Robin Hayes is my congressman . . . for the next two weeks, that is!
Hayes is an awful, awful "man." Soon, he'll be an awful, awful ex-congressman.
October 21, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
True dat, and yet, alas, I'd swap you my Congressthing, Virginia Foxx, for him in a heartbeat. There's absolutely no polling in the Fifth that I'm aware of, so I can still hope Coach Carter will beat her, but there'ws no denying her wingnut and PAC fattened warchest has him way outgunned.
October 21, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
This whole "Real America" talking point is pretty fucking disgusting.
October 21, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
True...the "Real American" part should be eliminated...and maybe "hate" should be removed. However, liberals do look down on the members of the electorate who live the "Patriotic-Church going-Self-reliant" life style. That's why Obama said we are bitter and we "cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them." It's also why 85% of voters who display the flag at home are for McCain and 85% who don't are for Obama. Michael Moore is as "Real American" as Rush Limbaugh, they ain't voting for the same guy though.
October 21, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Displays of patriotism are not patriotism.
October 21, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
True...as exhibited by the 15% on both sides.
October 21, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
These hangovers from the "silent majority" time period have woken up and found out that America is biracial, diverse and accepting of celebrating our differences.
October 21, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, America has been "biracial, diverse and accepting of celebrating our differences" for quite along time. The left just quit being "accepting" of anything they don't like and have been on the move to destroy it ever since. You know...dangerous stuff like the Boy Scouts, Nativity Scenes and Veteran's Memorials...
October 21, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your comments seem to be from the Twilight Zone, consistently. It is heartening that you no longer support racism. The enlightened among us will be ecstatic when you finally come to peace with religious diversity and accept that you don't own the only right answers to the questions of the human spirit.
On that day, you will be one of "us".
October 21, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like you live in Hidden Valley, where kids eat their cauliflower "popcorn" and have salad eating contests. Wow. What a great place to live!!!!
October 21, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whoa.
That's just about the most convoluted justification for hate speech I've ever seen.
Nice work.
October 21, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not trying to justify anything...just trying to identify the source of the sentiment that leads to these things.
October 21, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Sarge! You got it all backwards again.
It's the "Patriotic-Church going-Self-reliant" life style who look down on liberals. I know cause Ive had my fill of run-ins with them.
Still haven't found the medic to get your meds yet?
October 21, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am descended from and grew up with and among small town self-reliant church-going patriots. I know them well. And, knowing them well, I save my "looking down on" for the self-reliant church-going patriots who think they're the real Americans and I'm some sort of enemy alien because they think patriotism is about blood and soil and, yes, race, while I think its about freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion and assembly and the press. Its about freedom to question authority and to demand that my government conform its conduct to its ideals rather than being a mindeless goose-stepping subject. And, yes, freedom from having my neighbors use the government to impose their morals on me.
And, sadly, the ones who think I'm an enemy alien make up substantially more than 15% of the type. More like thirty or forty in my intimate experience.
The mutual disdain between rural and urban people probably started about fifteen minutes after the bricks dried in in the first city in Mesopotamia. The local bigwigs probably started exploiting that disdain for political gain the following day. Rural people and small town people are free to continue to believe that they have a monopoly on decency and uprightness and morality. It is their ancient birthright and it undoubtedly makes the grinding boredom easier to endure by turning it into a virtue. But the notion that one quarter of the population has a monopoly on patriotism, and, indeed, has the sole right to define what it is to be patriotic is facially stupid and breathtakingly self-defeating.
October 21, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody here cares what you think freeper.
October 21, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I usually refrain from responding to you SFC. I never agree with you, but I value your opinion. That said, the faux-patriotism of your flag-waving reference defeats all your aims to be conciliatory. I've read your comments and respected your opinion... even if I don't agree with it. But seriously, your equivocating this garbage deserves no respect. Republicans like Bachman, Hayes, Palin and McCain are doing more damage to this country than the necons have and probably ever will. I certainly hope the divisive campaign, and more importantly, the divisive ideology you whole-heartedly support with your precious vote, will go down in a blazing defeat on Nov. 4th. Yeah, and let's see how patriotic your "comrades" are when you have to say President Barack Hussein Obama... wave your flags in pride then. Jerks.
P.S. I'm not calling you a jerk... I don't envy you trying to find a silver lining in the clogged toilet of the Palin-McCain republican party. Your comment doesn't deserve respect, but you do... 'cause, in all sincerity, you're a real American.
October 21, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm really not sure what your point is, besides sensing an opportunity to break out the "bitter" line, but I'll say 2 things in response.
1. SOME liberals, of course, look down on rural America. Just as some Conservatives look down on big cities. But the current stream of hate and divisiveness is coming from conservatives (not liberals). It’s the McCain campaign deriding urban areas as not "real" or "patriotic."
2. You're misinterpreting Obama's bitter comments. He didn't say people in small towns were bitter because liberals look down on them, he said they were bitter because their problems are ignored by Washington:
You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter...
October 21, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I approve this message.
October 21, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
His problem isn't why their bitter, it's the fact that he thinks bitterness is what causes them to cling to their basic principles.
October 21, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, you're misinterpretating the comment. Getting "bitter" and "clinging to guns or Religion" are two seperate symptoms of being ignored by Washington.
And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
If he said "then they get bitter AND cling to guns or religion," your interpretation would be correct. But he didn't.
October 21, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess you're misunderstanding me...in his words we cling to guns and religion and antipathy for others because of our concerns about whether we're being heard or not in Washington...my point is we cling to our guns and religion inspite of what's going on in Washington...(or at least we have since June 21, 1788).
October 21, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
SFC, you're making me tired.
October 21, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you get it, nobody cares.
October 21, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
See, this is why liberals get so fed up with you right now. My husband and I are the only members in our families to have served in the military (jumping out of perfectly good airplanes, which does tend to call our judgement into question), fly the flag daily and not just on holidays, and vote for Democrats. Both of our siblings have been on and off welfare for most of their adult lives while we both put ourselves through college--on our own--and have worked full time before, during and after graduation. But we aren't "real" Americans like all of the Republican voters in our families. You can take your "real" Americans like Gov. Palin and shove them, sarge!
October 21, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I said that many a time to conservatives questioning my patriotism. I really love to shove it back on the one's who've never served time in the military. Who are they to question my love of country when they won't or didn't when they had the chance commit a few years of their lives protecting the country they claim to love so dearly.
October 21, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. This kind of crap has had me torqued for the whole Bush/Cheney administration. Along with the question "Can you imagine what it would have been like if Al Gore had been President on 9/11?!" No, I can't, because none of us ever imagined that scenario as we were going about our happy, secure lives. I would hazard a guess now, though, that we wouldn't be in the hole that the Current Occupant has dug us into over the last eight years. We certainly wouldn't be in any worse shape. And we'd probably be able to keep our shoes on in airports.
October 21, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
"And we'd probably be able to keep our shoes on in airports." So GWB caused Richard Reid?
October 21, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. He is. He (GWB) personally went over to whichever little European hidey-hole Reid was in and bought him a precious little pair of Ferragamos, making sure that they fit perfectly, and made sure that he had his ticket and boarding pass in hand, walked him to the boarding area and sent him off to get on the plane with a supportive little slap on the behind.
He just forgot to teach him how to light the fuse.
Get real.
October 21, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe so.
October 21, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Self-reliant? There's a net outflow of taxes from my liberal northeastern city to the rest of my state and my state to the rest of the country. I'm thinking that wouldn't be the case if the self-reliant were so.
October 21, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Self-reliant? There's a net outflow, by a large margin, of taxes from my liberal city to the rural parts of my state and from my state to the country. I don't think that would be the case if you were self-reliant.
October 21, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lets be real, people in small towns, like people in cities, or people of a particular ethnic group or race, or religion..DO CLING to those things that are familiar and reassuring to them in hard times (whether its the current economic situation, family tragedy etc.) That is what Obama meant and its true. Republicans and the media have latched on to the WORDS that were used ("cling") and completely lost the meaning. It is why when 9/11 occurred we all clung to each other as Americans and to our nationality which had the effect of both comforting us and creating this "us against the world" bellicosity that resulted in a blind march to war and anti-Muslim behavior. Its human nature. I say all this because I am tired of people bringing back that comment as a justification for voting against Obama, or for stupid statements like this one.
October 21, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've held off on the sarge, but you're absolutely right. Since when is to "cling to" something a pejorative term, especially when used in the context of spirituality or religious belief? How many storm metaphors have used the idea of "clinging" on to a rock to ride out the storm, with the rock being one's faith, Christ, etc.?
Suddenly, this image is bad just because Barack said it?
It never was an elitist slam coming from a man who understands quite a bit about his ancestors "clinging" to religion during the dark days of slavery.
You neoconfederates need to get over yourselves.
October 21, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. Should have said "the neoconfederates" as I wasn't addressing ghost directly. Probably the sarge.
October 21, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...from a man who understands quite a bit about his ancestors "clinging" to religion during the dark days of slavery."
His ancestry is in Kenya, not Kentucky...
October 22, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
By "Patriotic-Church-going-self-reliant," you mean Amis people? I think Conservatives hate them; we like them for heterogeneity's sake. If you mean Repugs in general, we don't look down upon them. We feel responsible to educate them and make them more tolerant and more efficient citizens. If you keep hanging out here and listening to our noble ideas, you could become a better person at the end.
October 21, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel compelled to point out that your use of the term "Repug" kind of undermines your message.
October 21, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol...it's nice when one of y'all spot it.
October 22, 2008 8:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
My neighbor, a dyed-in-the-wool Republican, flies his American flag 365 days a year. But he doesn't handle it as I was taught to do in the Boy Scouts: he never takes it down at night, never removes it for a storm. As a result, the flag is tattered, faded and pretty sad looking. I, by contrast, fly my flag a few times a year (Fourth of July, Memorial Day, etc.) Is he a bigger, better American and "patriot" than me, SFC?
October 21, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
SFC,
You write:
"liberals do look down on the members of the electorate who live the "Patriotic-Church going-Self-reliant" life style. "
I have read this claim over and over, and I take issue with it. I will try to be as honest as I can in addressing my perspective as a "liberal". I am of course speaking for myself and no other self-identifying liberal.
When I see someone waving the flag, I don't look down on them. Rather, it makes me wonder a little bit what they're feeling because I don't get the same warm fuzzy that they apparently do. My son asked me the other day what I thought characterized "Americans", and I told him that IMO Americans are lucky. We're lucky to live in a country that has the freedoms we have, that has the economic infrastructure we have, that has the wealth of food and natural resources we have. Frankly, most of us don't do a hell of a lot to deserve this luck. Most of "us" (I am not, of course, speaking about immigrants) were lucky enough to actually have been born here, so it isn't as if by our own initiative we made a great effort to get here. I don't honestly feel that we are "better" than anyone else, or more blessed, or more deserving. So, I don't "look down" on flag wavers, I actually don't understand them.
Church going? That's a choice, I have nothing against church going folks, I have been one myself at various times in my life. Self reliant? See the previous paragraph -- it's easy to be self reliant when the society you live in is structured in way that makes it so easy to get whatever you need.
There is of course the issue of military service; an argument is often made by conservatives that liberals don't appreciate the sacrifices of the military. I was raised in a pacifist household -- my ancestors were Mennonites, and although I myself am not religious, I was raised by people active in various peace movements. If we were invaded by an enemy, I honestly don't know if I could take up arms -- I hope I never have to find out. I do believe that all the wars that have been fought in my lifetime (since 1957) by the US were wars of choice rather than wars of necessity, so I don't buy that the young men and women in uniform are "fighting and dying for my right to be free". These wars were engaged in by the US to advance its perceived national interest, which is a different reason entirely. I recognize that soldiers have many different reasons for wanting to serve in the armed forces, however, and so I don't "look down" on them, rather, as above, I don't really understand them; and since I don't know what personally motivates each of them, I have to abstain from judgment of their actions. If they end up killing someone in an unjust war, they have to answer to their own Maker, not to me.
Maybe it's just that the grass is always greener, but I feel far more "looked down upon" by conservatives that I feel like I am looking down on them myself.
Cheers.
-- Ned
October 21, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tell my children this all the time. We are LUCKY to be Americans. LUCKY to be able to hold and speak our own opinions. LUCKY simply by where we were born, and it's our patriotic duty to earn that luck. When it's all over, we should look back on our lives and know that we earned the right call ourselves an American. But some people end up squandering their luck, and blaming everyone else because they "never got a break."
I figure from birthplace forward I had to work for everything because there was no more Luck Quota left for me!
We are given our freedoms, and if we don't use them, then we ought to give them to someone who will, because believe me, there are people all over the world who are dying (literally) to use theirs.
October 21, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
After Obama's acceptance speech, I bought a flag and pole. First time in my life.
Am I patriotic? I assume so. It's difficult to declare my patriotism when those who push us into needless wars use "patriotism" as a tool. They devalued the word, and the flag.
October 21, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
SFC Wallace, Do you actually not understand that the "cling" comment by Obama was a sympathetic one to those people? It was only an after the fact misrepresentation of those remarks that turned them into something bad. The very idea that that was a nasty or condescending statement is a lie. Do you not get that? I do. Take your friggin' lies somewhere else.
October 21, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Do you actually not understand that the "cling" comment by Obama was a sympathetic one to those people?"
Actually, while he may have intended sympathy, most took it as condesension. Which is why it became a political issue.
October 21, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, your team intentionally lied about it's intent so that the low information voters -read that Republicans- would think it was condescension. That's called a lie and that's what you're pushing.
October 21, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...so that the low information voters -read that Republicans-"
See, I have no idea why we would think liberals look down on us...
October 21, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
No people like you are the reason.
October 21, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure like to see where you get that "85%" number or are you just pulling it out of thin air?
October 21, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was the one last week that showed a 3 point seperation...on RCP...I'll try to go back and look. One of the questions was whether or not your household displays a flag.
October 21, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
More like out of his ass.
October 21, 2008 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
My nephew-in-law just joined the Marines, my first cousin's done 3 tours in Iraq and Kuwait, my dad and uncles were all vets including a career navy officer. Hell, my grandfather was one of the most decorated vets of WWI. And we're Democrats.
People like SFCWallace are all over the place though. I'll give him this though, he'd probably say it to our face. Can't tell you in recent years how frequent it's gotten for the right wing to just insult their neighbors and their whole families to their faces in despite of their service. Because once you disagree with them on politics, sacrifice and honor mean nothing. Only people who vote their way have flags. I'll think of you and your comments on Nov 11, SFC Wallace, when we're visiting my dad's grave. The one with the flag on it.
October 21, 2008 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I'm very "non confrontational" about politics. I beleive everyone's entitled to their opinion. However, if you ask me mine I have no problem telling you. My neighbor has an Obama Biden sign right in the middle of his front lawn. I have McCain Palin. His kids run past it when they come over to jump on our trampoline, ours run past them on the way to their house.
October 21, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go crap on someone else's lawn.
October 21, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just looked you up in Dickapedia and damned if you were there.
October 21, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dickapedia...lol. Would you mind if I borrowed that line?
October 22, 2008 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
How could we have so many dolts in elected Gov't??? Even Bclinton forgot about the video tape and camera phone...
This is perverse in its stupidity...but True to form in that side of the Presidentual Election.
Appealing to the lowest common denominator and bunching in a box- no longer works...Yes , we have 'rednecks' but many are informed and concerned and not bigots...Some choose Not to be part of the 'inner city' but that does not make them more or less patriotic nor vice versa.....
This is another place that the Mccain group is 'Out of Touch --or chooses not to 'get it'!!!
October 21, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is like a lot of stuff that starts with Palin. She says something inflammatory, the any graceless surrogate, whether or not directly a part of the campaign or not, begins to run with it, thinking they can score a touchdown like Sarah, their new hero.
It leads to cries of "Kill him!" at rallies, the likes of Michelle Bachmann (who is definitely paying the fair price for her inanity), and now this. There are many other examples, ofcourse.
October 21, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm thinking that right about now McCain is wishing he'd picked Barbara Lorman, R-WI, who demonstrated this morning that she is really a maverick, unafraid of bucking her party with a long history of experience and supporting her party as well. And she can speak a coherent sentence.
If he had chosen any running mate who had pulled his campaign to the center I think he'd have won. I can't believe Obama isn't winning by more, given how the Palin "energy" has surfaced up these really scary, hateful people as "her base." Her "energy" swayed all his advisors to go to what Limbaugh called the Babies, Guns and Jesus talking points because it gave them a temporary poll boost, and that's what has cost them so much -- chasing voters they probably already had.
Obama has been at the head of a massive, nationally-based corporation for as long as Palin has been governor. His company hasn't deviated from its marketing campaign or brand message in all this time. Errors have been admitted and corrected. He's deployed regional managers with proven skills who have in turn hired local directors and put a viable storefront all over the country with strong customer service levels, allowing him to be brand leader and cheerleader for his employees and stakeholders. Why do they keep saying he has no executive experience?
October 21, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. He never intended for his words to be recorded and publicized. He never intended to get caught.
October 21, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not like "Macaca" was a big story or anything...
October 21, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's been Bachmann-ized. Time raise $ for his challenger...
October 21, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he blatantly lies about it - doesn't he realize EVERYTHING is recorded in some form or another these days?
Also slightly off-topic, but it's funny to see down ticket candidates popping up over at Kos these days with stories of their opponents smearing Democrats in one from or another.
October 21, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mark Twain said you should never lie, because if you tell the truth you don't have to remember everything you said.
October 21, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Being the anti-technology kinda guy I am, I can't really understand these ewe-tubes they talk about but here in Real amurika we have all our ewes' tubes tied so there won't be these types of "accidents"
October 21, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, so he couldn't even control his tongue?
October 21, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
has anyone used the word "islamosocialism" yet? if not, i'm sure it won't be long.
October 21, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I LOVE it! islamosocialism!
You're my new hero!
October 21, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liberal/Dem policies are inclusive and provide for ALL Americans. (It's repub policies that cut out large groups of voters.)
October 21, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
And another great line for Caribou barbie,
"The VP is in charge of the senate."
October 21, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shut up.
October 21, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
seriously. she said it.
October 21, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/21/palin-vp-senate/
I was commenting about her Michael Jackson 'Thriller' jacket in an earlier thread. Heh.
Gawd, she's freakin' stupid.
October 21, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Boy, you could collect these lines and set up a dictatorship so easily.
October 21, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Th thing about this quote is that it is really representative of the damage that McCain and Bush and Rove and their minions have done to this country. The economy is messed. The Iraq war was a disaster in planning. But this...this!?!? This is the Republican legacy I will most regret: Division, Xenophobia, Uber-patriotism representative of a dictator-led Germany. The republican legacy of hatred and fear is a legacy of the coward and shallow... and it stinks to high heaven. We can get through the other stuff. But we can't get over this. Throw the bums out. Bachman, Hayes, Palin, McCain. Throw 'em out.
October 21, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you realize that you have gone so far off of the "Bush is McCain is Bush" deep end that you now list McCain at the top of your hate list above Bush and Rove? You guys really can twist reality when you get to ranting...
"Th thing about this quote is that it is really representative of the damage that McCain and Bush and Rove and their minions"
October 21, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is the leader of the Republican Party. The one that is running the sleaziest, most dishonest campaign in a generation. So yeah, he's at the top of the list.
October 21, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
...but Bush is a war criminal and Rove is...is...I don't know...Satan. Now it's McCain at the top...making me question the sincerity of all the other charges.
October 21, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that you're comfortable with the possibility of a Palin presidency makes me question the sincerity of all your statements.
October 21, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
How can Bush be a War criminal, when he was AWOL during wartime?
October 21, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
How are those statements mutually exclusive?
October 21, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Iraq war, The messed up economy... really there are a lot of people you could blame for it and, you can defend any of the credibly (sort of...). Ushering in an era of divisive politics (South Carolina in 2000 to 'Real Americans' in 2008) is really the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I never thought McCain was Bush. I also don't hate McCain. Don't hate Bush either. That doesn't change the fact that McCain has brought hate to the national stage, embraced it like he embraced Bristol's baby father, legitimized it and then told the American people that they did it because Rep. Lewis called them on it. Pathetic. Call that the deep end... I'll get some goggles and a better swimsuit 'cause it's clear where I am.
October 21, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you recall all that torture stuff Bush authorized? Well, torture is a war crime. The worst war criminals in history never fired a weapon in war.
Bus is a war criminal. He will not be able to travel overseas much since he could be nabbed and brought to trial.
It took years for the international courts to catchup with Slobodan Milosevic as well.
If you think Bush's worst problems are behind him once he out of office, you are either uninformed or in severe denial.
October 21, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand why you characterize disagreement with hate.
"McCain is the desperate head of a washed up party that is staffed by unprincipled surrogates willing to say and do anything to win an election" is not a hateful statement. It's an opinion.
"McCain is a prep school graduate who divorced his first wife while living with another woman, and who claims proudly his close ties to an unrepentent convicted domestic terrorist" is not a hateful statement either. It's fact.
"McCain should lapse into a coma like all the other people who look like him" is hate.
See?
October 21, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are you here?
October 21, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are you here?
October 21, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you denying that McCain-Palin and their campaign have been pushing/mainstreaming the rhetoric coming out of their rallies? When you are intimating that your opponent friends with terroristS aren't you stretching the bounds of political decency?
For all the crap Bush did as President, I don't recall him or Cheney suggesting that their opponent was in league with terroristS. Ever. Sure they argued that they wanted to protect America more or try to corner the market on patriotism.
So yes they deserve top billing for mainstreaming this crap.
October 21, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to clear up the 'S thing, Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers are both unrepentant terrorists, therefore the use of the plural form "terrorists" is grammatically correct.
October 21, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Todd Palin (member of separatist group) and G. Gordon Libby are???
October 21, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy Cow! Todd Palin and G. Gordon Liddy set off bombs at the US Capital, the Pentagon and a Judge's house while the family was sleeping their? You've got a real scoop there, call Keith Olberman...or better yet Dan Rather, he may be able to produce some incriminating documents to back up your claim!
October 21, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, by your logic then we should not be hunting down any of the Al Qaeda members who did not bomb or kill anyone directly. They only planned, aided and abetted the crime.
Liddy made threats of violence and even planned assassination of political leaders.
Palin belongs to a group that advocates the forceful over through of our government.
Your problem is that you idolize people who terrorize in the cause of Christian conservatism because in your mind it is justified, even holy.
With this current campaign of divisiveness sponsored by your party, I am much more concerned about the terrorists here at home. How many on the fringe of your party, after feeding on the red meat and demonizing progressives, will take the path of Tim McVey when Obama is elected and a solid majority of Democrats occupy both houses of congress?
October 21, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Celebrities have long ago learned that when everyone is a reporter with a recording device, and a publisher with sites like YouTube, you have to really be careful about what you do and say in public.
Politicians are still apparently learning this lesson.
This will make hate-speech more national and less regional -- which will either institutionalize it, or kill it.
The choice is ours.
October 21, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I actually was trying to work to keep the crowd as respectful as possible, so this is definitely not what I intended.
He was "trying to work" at keeping the crowd "as respectful as possible" by claiming that "Liberals hate real Americans".
I guess the devil made him do it.
October 21, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the article about Caribou-Barbie and the role of the P
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/21/palin-vp-senate/
October 21, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is she not aware of what she is saying from moment to moment? Stuff like this just slips out and is then forgotten? I see...
October 21, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
O/T, but has anyone else noticed how Bachmann resembles Katherine Harris?
October 21, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Separated at birth.
October 21, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is heading back onto the interview circuit this week - I guess they view it as they have nothing to lose. Of course they've hand-picked the interviewer because Katie proved to be too tough.
Expect more Hannity-style infomercials.
Of course Palin is probably considered a safer interview by the McCain Camp than Obama views Biden right now.
October 21, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I fear they're trying to lay groundwork for 2012. And I swear to god, we have to do everything to help make sure she bites the dust.
October 21, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
figuratively speaking!
October 21, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely! Figuratively only.
October 21, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are letting your fears get the best of you.
Palin will not be around in 2012 as a candidate. She will probably either (a) run for Senate or (b) become part of FNC.
If you must worry, worry about Mike Huckabee. He is the very scary individual that most seem to have already forgotten.
October 21, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gosh I hope the guy Walt Monegan runs against her if she tries to run for the Senate.
October 21, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fantasize all you like. But AK is a 1-party GOP state (much like MA is a 1-party Dem state), and after this outing, Palin will be able to go back to Alaska and talk of national experience. She will also already have been plugged into the money and the national GOP machine. She has no chance at a National level, and if she is smart enough to curb her ambition a bit, she could clean up at the Senate level -- which would be a job-for-life.
October 21, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is anyone else struck by the similarities between all this "real" Americans rhetoric and the anti-city revolt of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia?
October 21, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
It reminds me of the Orthodoxy wars within Christianity. The "true" faithful. Versus the heretics.
October 21, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The shoe is a sign! Follow the shoe!
October 21, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact they say this sorta line and categorically deny it when exposed suggests they do know it only works for the base but drives away people outside. And they are trying, but it becomes more and more difficult for them to have it both ways, i.e., to play a bipartisan champion on surface and to act as a fascist under the radar. The duality exposed, and you are a liar. Thank god for Internet.
October 21, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love it. It took the intertubes to bring accountability to politicians. The Bachmann backlash set a precedent. In just a weekend, a line has been drawn in the sand that Republicans are truly afraid to cross.
October 21, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you've put your finger on it!
October 21, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can tell you one thing, rural Minnesota is no agrarian utopia, unless if by agriculture you mean meth-amphetamine production. I like the Palin as Pol Pot idea, except Pot was better educated.
October 21, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its pretty obvious the Republicans know there going to lose and there trying to divide this country as much as possible.
October 21, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I cannot think of anything more moronic than to try and divide America into the "real vs. unreal/heretic/blah, blah, blah".
Seems like the last gasps of a hopelessly divided Party. "Party"-how ironic for them.
October 21, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about the republican sideshow? or circus?
October 21, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the McCain folks want to play it "us vs. them," that's fine. There are more of us.
October 21, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like to think of it more inclusively. They are part of us. They refuse to recognize that.
October 21, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
As obvious as they were, whatever they are, what should we think of a person who has no control or skill to communicate? Are we to believe that these things just come out with no understanding and no immediate reflection of how they will be received? Does he have a medical condition explaining why he didn't, at that time, have any control? Even people with Tourrettes can see the effect of what they knew they just said.
I am just trying to give him the benefit of doubt that this wasn't his intention. He must have some unknown physical dysfunction that makes him loose symbolic control of language. With this as the most forgivable reason, is he an appropriate person, as a candidate, until he understands his hopefully curable or controllable affliction?
Or maybe he is just a jerk. I will let you know in a couple of days if that is what I actually intended to say.
October 21, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a little disappointed in TPM.
The headline says Hays "Fibbed."
Fibbing is what I do when my wife asks "do these jeans make my butt look big?"
Hays LIED. Continued deny the statement; another, LIE and has now been exposed as a liar. Do you think he would have 'fessed up without the audio surfacing?
Spin that, neocon/repugs.
October 21, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The pattern speaks for itself: Their last resort is to go back to JC McCarthy? I see a real big SIGN of the demise of GOP. Thank you, Palin, McCain, Bachmann, Rep. Robin Hayes and all others, for your generous help to accomplish this goal.
Birth of a new party is in the near future !
October 21, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, the Repugs are real "respectful" til they get caught. He "forgot?" Sure he did.
October 21, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
These loons really believe that crap about liberals, you know. To them it's as real as daylight. Doesn't much matter what educated people think....
October 21, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The first time I heard the "real America" crap it was being spewed by that asshole Glenn Beck, who said something like, "Isn't America a little more real when you get away from places like New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco?"
That was right about the time seven hillbillies in West Virginia were arrested for kidnapping and torturing a young black girl.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5idxqh511E5lHfNvljI2sQ1H52W7gD93EPKHG0
Real America my ass. Like Jon Stewart says, "Fuck all y'all" with your real America bullshit.
October 21, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This division and ignorant faux patriotic rhetoric really pisses me off!
ALL Americans are REAL Americans!
As Obama said during his convention speech:
We ALL put our country first!
This questioning of patriotism and love of country just because of policy disagreements has got to stop. I'm not going to question the motives behind some neocon's delusions of grandeur and geopolitical conquest. I sincerely think that they think what they're supporting is best for the country. I think it's perfectly reasonable to point out that it's WRONG without having to resort to wondering if they're somehow out to sabotage the nation just because their ideas are silly. I expect the same in return for the ideas I support.
October 21, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
This division and ignorant faux patriotic rhetoric really pisses me off!
ALL Americans are REAL Americans!
As Obama said during his convention speech:
We ALL put our country first!
This questioning of patriotism and love of country just because of policy disagreements has got to stop. I'm not going to question the motives behind some neocon's delusions of grandeur and geopolitical conquest. I sincerely think that they think what they're supporting is best for the country. I think it's perfectly reasonable to point out that it's WRONG without having to resort to wondering if they're somehow out to sabotage the nation just because their ideas are silly. I expect the same in return for the ideas I support.
October 21, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, seriously:
"I genuinely did not recall making the statement..."
He didn't recall making it? What's next, "the dog ate all the nice things I was going to say about Obama, so I had to resort to hate speech"?
October 21, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
If only Obama had agreed to a town hall meeting with McCain every week, it would not have come to this. So you see, this is Obama's fault. He left them no choice but to behave like a--holes.
October 21, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alberto Gonzalez had a recollection problem, too.
October 21, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Time to Bachmannize this asshole. His Democratic opponent is Larry Kissell.
Send him some love, here:
http://www.larrykissell.com/contribute.asp
October 21, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
October 21, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's get rid of him!!!
October 21, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's Larry Kissell's ActBlue page. Re-live the joy of watching the figure rocket, a la Bachbot...
http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/16138
October 21, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lord I am so tired of these divisions. My recent moment of joy was greeting a colleague at work Monday morning. This fellow, originally from Texas, has been a staunch supporter of the GOP for the nearly 11 years I have worked with him. We have treated each other with respect though very rarely did we agree on core governing approaches (especially with Bush in office). On Monday morning he told me that, for the first time he voted Democratic, he voted absentee for Barack Obama. I almost cried.
October 21, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all just part of the "voter fraud" tactic-- "real" Americans vote for McCain, "imaginary" Americans vote for Obama, thus all of Obama's votes are fake.
October 21, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I genuinely did not recall making the statement and, after reading it, there is no doubt that it came out completely the wrong way. I actually was trying to work to keep the crowd as respectful as possible, so this is definitely not what I intended."
Briefly, baloney.
October 21, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
And so now we know, "it did not come out wrong."
I have just made a donation to the campaign of Larry Kissel, Democratic candidate for the North Carolina Eighth District.
http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/16138
As I did for the opponent of Rep. Michele Bachmann.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
October 21, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
O/T question.
How does one get a little picture (avatar?). Every time I try I get a message that says my moveable type session has timed out.
Is there a secret handshake or something I don't know about?
October 21, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not sure about a secret handshake. You should be able to insert it in your profile page. I'm no techie, so don't know why if it's not working.
October 21, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"unrepentant terrorists" Another meaningless tag from wing-nut Wallace. Repent, all you terrorists! Repent!
October 21, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
You have GOT to love the internet.
October 21, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just remember folks, you can donate to Hayes opponent at http://www.larrykissell.com/contribute.asp
I did.. and I feel so much better :) even 5 or 10$ will help beat this cretin. Send him back to the farm.
October 21, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or, as an old bus driver from Brooklyn once said: "Homina, homina, homina......"
You'd think that this jerk would have the moral courage to stand by his comments.
The Republicans are sounding increasingly desperate by the hour.
October 21, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink