« Election Central Morning Roundup | Home | Obama Going Up On The Air In Georgia, North Dakota, And ... Arizona! »
Early Voting Extended In North Carolina
More good news for Obama on the early voting front: It's been extended in North Carolina, reports the Charlotte Observer.
North Carolina Republicans, predictably, are outraged by the extension -- not because Obama is leading McCain in early voting in the state by 59%-33%, as of two days ago -- but because they say they're worried about the stressed out election officials.
Advertisement















I'm sure people will volunteer to step in and help election officials. I would. You would. This is nothing but a smoke screen.
October 31, 2008 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
A party as committed as the Republicans are to suppressing democracy ought to be banned from electoral politics until they cut the crap.
October 31, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nicely said.
October 31, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heard about this last night on my way home, i think they are making it so people can early vote until Sat 5 pm.
October 31, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm gonna get shit for this by a few people, but for anyone here who thinks Obama has this election locked and in the bag, read this...
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/30/is-mccain-on-the-comeback-trail.aspx?GT1=43002
October 31, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, you aren't going to get any shit for this. . .an analogous sports article would be entitled "Are the Jets set to win the Superbowl this year?" (and this is coming from a diehard Jets fan).
October 31, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
And then the entire crux of the story would be that the Jets' only chance at winning the Superbowl were hinged on some incredibly unlikely occurrence, like, I don't know, Favre not throwing a single interception for the rest of the season.
In other words: not gonna happen.
(Packer fan here. haha!)
October 31, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Touche
October 31, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
All that piece says is Obama is ahead everywhere but McCain can come back if he wins PA. That's it.
I'm not worried about PA.
October 31, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nate Silver:
Let's start with the Pennsylvania result. Mason-Dixon is a pretty strong pollster. So, however, are many others from among the literally dozen or so agencies that have conducted polling within Pennsylvania over the past 72 hours. And none of those other pollsters shows the race that tight.
Mason-Dixon has also had a Republican "lean" this cycle of perhaps 2-3 points. They are quite frequently the most favorable number for John McCain in any given state. That doesn't mean that they are "biased", and it doesn't mean that they are wrong – there are many different (and legitimate!) ways to think about this election. But it does mean that their polls need to be interpreted in that context. Let's say the average poll in Pennsylvania has Obama ahead by 9.5 points. Mason-Dixon will probably start out seeing a 9.5-point state at a 7-point state. If they then end up toward the McCain side of their margin of error -- and they don't use huge sample sizes – that’s how you get to Obama +4.
Now, look. I don't think we need to be in the habit of ripping a poll apart every time that we don't like the result. There is nothing inherently "wrong" with this poll. It's simply that we need to look at in concert with the rest of the evidence. In this case, we have an abundance of evidence, and it suggests on balance that Pennsylvania is neither particularly close, nor is it particularly "tightening" (Mason-Dixon's prior poll of the state, in Mid-September, had Obama up by 2).
It might also help to come at this from the other direction. Here is one poll out of many, out of one "must-win" state out of many, that shows that John McCain is sorta kinda close? This is the best news he can muster? On Monday, I laid out specific criteria for what I'd want to see in order to conclude that the race has tightened materially:
John McCain polling within 2 points in 2 or more non-partisan polls ... in at least 2 out of the 3 following states: Colorado, Virginia, Pennsylvania.
We have yet to see any such results in any of these three states.
October 31, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, the upshot is, we should wring our hands over Pennsylvania? Sorry, ain't buying it.
October 31, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whoops - this was intended as a reply to ChicagoJoe.
October 31, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chicago Joe,
Of course Obama and his campaign have to take nothing for granted and go all out in the last days.
Pennsylvania was singled out in the article. it is key. Mason Dixon was not the only pollster with data only from this week. There are others who have data from this week which show Obama leading in high single digits and double digits. Check RCP's page.
Obama traveled there, Biden went there and the Clintons will be there. With 1.1 more Democrats than GOPers in the state Obama's chances should be good.
October 31, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mason Dixon does have a PA poll from a month ago. They only had it at Obama +2 then, which was as much of an outlier then as this poll is now.
October 31, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is the best part of this election, almost.
Obama organized against vote suppression and it's working!
I'm so excited this morning -
October 31, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I posted this in another thread but it warms my heart to see things like it:
October 31, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love this so.
It's like the entire country woke up and said for real this time: No you are not going to do this to us again.
It's too early to start crying - but goddamn! This is the most encouraging thing that has happened yet -
October 31, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shine a light on cockroaches and they scatter. Before Republicans would use their dirty tricks and you'd only hear about it locally, and probably not until it was too late to do anything about it if not until after the election.
You call attention to them and make them explain what they are doing, and they can't without looking shady and ridiculous.
October 31, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Greg,
Please add an update in this post that counties MAY opt out of the extended hours. We should expect to see extended hours in the largest population counties but it is possible that rural counties will opt to still close at 1pm.
People can contact their local boards of elections to find out what they've decided:
http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/content.aspx?id=13
Also - it was actually GOP members of the state board of election who wanted to open the extended hours to the entire state b/c they didn't want just blue counties opened longer. So while local GOP members have fought extended hours, the GOP members of the state board of elections made a pretty fair proposal to open all the sites (unless the local boards unanimously decide otherwise).
October 31, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
it's amazing how Reps will tell you with A STRAIGHT FACE that they get pissed when localities make voting EASIER for all voters (and they're mighty pissed also about the fact the Rep governor in FLORIDA has also extended hours for early voting...)
like other posters here, I'm very pleased the Obama campaign has successfully organized against Repubugs' attempts to disenfranchise voters, and that judges across the country aren't buying the Repugs' attempts to violate voters' rights either.. it seems like finally the country is waking up to this.. I fervently hope that if Obama wins and gets big enough Dem majorities in Congress they will finally fix this huge problem once and for all..
(the Repugs have been in power since 2000, yet they never fixed this problem IN EIGHT YEARS -- this alone should tell you someting -- should tell you A LOT...)
October 31, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Goddamn pesky voters, they're such a nuisance. Another example of how entitlements are killing efficient government.
October 31, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink