Early Snap Polls: Biden Won Handily
The first round of snap polls give the debate to Joe Biden, by sizable margins.
CBS polled 473 uncommitted debate-watchers, and found that 46% say Biden won, 21% say Palin won, and 33% say it was a tie.
While both candidates saw their images improve, 98% saw Biden as "knowledgeable" after the debate, while only 66% saw Palin as knowledgeable, an admittedly high number, given what folks thought of her before tonight.
Meanwhile, CNN's poll of debate-watchers found that far more thought Biden did the best job in the debate (51%) than Palin did (36%).
And here's a really key number from CNN. While a startling 84% said Palin did better than expected, it still wasn't enough for her to clear her basic hurdle tonight: Only 46% said she's qualified to serve as president, up only four points from before the debate. And a clear majority, 53%, say she is not qualified.
It's not wise to put too much stock in snap polls. But if this bears out, it'll confirm our earlier argument: Palin's disastrous interviews raised expectations for her tonight, in the sense that the pressure on her to prove she's ready for the job was even higher than it otherwise might have been. And she didn't prove it, at least according to these early numbers.
Late Update: As he so often does when it comes to poll numbers, Mark Blumenthal provides a much needed reality check.















I feel reassured American people are not falling for the Bush Redux gimmick.
October 2, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg:
I keep saying I don't trust polls. But I'm loving these post-debate snappers. Because they're forcing the MSM spinners to react accordingly.
So rather than them setting the narrative immediately, the polls are forcing them to extend the narrative.
Never thought I'd like a polls. God Bless Them.
October 3, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saw Kos' thoughts, eh?
October 3, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't, until you pointed out.
But knowing now Kos and I think alike, it's not always a compliment.
October 3, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who said complement? I was just looking at the timing of your comments with the timing of his post. His remarks came between your two posts.
October 3, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think people approached already having concerns about Palin's understanding of issues and solutions. Because those concerns already existed, Palin's folksiness was far less effective than it has been in the past. People weren't afraid that she "isn't one of us," so her aw-shucks shuffling didn't help her much. On the other hand, people were concerned that she doesn't understand the issues of the day, and she did little to reassure them on that score.
October 2, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You betcha!
October 2, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my goodness, what an avatar - Mishima - that's some hutzpah.
:)
October 2, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quite impressive that you recognized it!
October 2, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've read them.
And Kawabata.
But right now my Japanese literary heart is Murikami's.
October 3, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wind-Up Bird Chronicle is a treasure.
October 3, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
O god yes - it's in my top 25.
I love some early ones though - I love truly love A Hard Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World.
October 3, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
How arrogant.
October 3, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
How arrogant that you would declare two people discussing texts and avatars "arrogant".
October 3, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden gave the best debate performance I have ever seen. Really. I hope this doesn't get lost in all the talk about Palin. To my mind, she did just well enough for it to be clear that Joe Biden's performance was truly (not just relatively) spectacular.
October 2, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Biden was on fire tonight.
October 2, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes.
October 2, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't get enough credit for being damn good. He makes it look too easy. But he was great. He had an impossible task but pulled it off.
ps. Freep these polls!
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/2/224641/188/979/618368
October 3, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
8 years of disaster and major trouble with economy is finally waking up America. Any my god, the "talking points" she dredged up on the cute little note cards in her mind.
October 2, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if the economy hasn't been the tipping point already. I wonder if people haven't pretty much already made up their minds.
October 2, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now I feel better. As with the last presidential debate, the viewers were smarter than the network commentators.
The split in who won is especially meaningful when you consider that the Obama-McCain polls are something like 50-45. That means more than half the McCain supporters said Palin lost.
October 2, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN showing meters for people when he says timelines for withdrawing in Iraq. The lines go UP. When she says "white flag of surrender" the meters go way down. Why does McCain-Palin think the surge and Iraq are winners?
October 2, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for that "white flag" info. She hesitated before she replied and it just screamed "talking point"...
October 2, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's exactly what I thought when she said that.
October 2, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
This was a speech only a wingnut could love.
And when she wasn't annoying me with the faux folksy and craptacular cutesy shit, her white flag, "never again" and other assorted crap made her sound like a stark-raving TaliBaptist. Really, I don't like to throw terms like this around, but at one point I said to the hubby, "Fuck all!! The only thing missing is a one-arm salute."
October 2, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somewhat off topic, but McCain's point on Iraq is politically idiotic.
If he said "Thanks to me we won, now we can come home in victory" he's win major support. Even though it's not true.
Instead he says "Thanks to my surge, we won and now we get to stay and fight in Iraq forever"
It's no wonder he's not gaining traction.
October 2, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doing better than expected is actually very damning for Palin because it shows people have a low opinion of her, and even if they said she did better than expected, that doesn't say they thought she won, did better, passed the CIC test or anything near that. When the bar is set so low, it's impossible not to exceed it.
October 2, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
i still believe they negotiated away to much for this debate.
notes???.. they should never be allowed.
and can you imagine 5 minutes of debate after questions?
ok its over , but still it could have been more.
and why is it that 90% of americans still have no idea what palin actually believes or even that she is under investigation?
amazing.
October 2, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen. That whole thing was a sham on its face. But, given what we had, she still is an abject failure on issues. NO ability to discuss...
Sad commentary on America. I agree with Sully- her rejection of the msm means we may not get any press conferences and that would be an incredible failure on the part of American media if this is allowed to occur.
October 2, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Am I crazy, or did the crowd-o-meter dip every time Palin said "Maverick"? Did anyone else see that?
October 2, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, new rule. We can never say "dude" or maverick" again, OMG, it is disgusting.
October 2, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Second'd
October 2, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Third'd.
October 3, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.I know everyone would say Biden should've cornered her. Forced her off the script. But I think this is exactly what the Obama camp aimed for tonight. They went into the debate, not looking for Palin to fall apart. They wanted to make sure Biden doesn't come across as condescending or rude. They did not want to win "gotcha" or "beauty" points. They wanted to win or substance.
Because, I'm not expert, but anyone who's dissappointed, give a shout at me on Monday. After all the gloss, the glitter and the charm erodes the questions about her abilities will remain.
These are serious times. The country is looking for serious leaders.
October 2, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden didn't have to force Palin off script...she went off willingly on her own. And even the commentators saw it and have remarked on her avoiding subjects to regurgitate McCain's talking points
October 2, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steven (hubby) and I looked at each other and said, "What was the question again?"
October 2, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
When does someone mention that this must be the only VP (or Presidential) debate in history when one of the candidates WINKED at the camera? Twice!
October 2, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maverick. Surge. Iraq. White flag. Taxes.
No. Sincerity. Or brains. At all.
October 2, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden was specific on remedies.
Palin was generic and fluttering about with generalities and avoiding being caught defining any point that could be used against her or McCain.
October 2, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think what happened tonight is that Americans were able to reconcile the Palin from the RNC with the Palin of the Couric interview. And thanks to the internet, Tina Fey, and even some in the MSM the narrative was already there: Palin is strong with talking points, even talking points she doesn't understand, but is lost with out them. She is what she is - and that's your typical 11:00 PM News Anchor/Actor.
I imagine that after about 24 hours of trying to pretend Palin is the bomb, the campaign camp is going to do everything possible to make her disappear. They are going to try and shorten the field and make a last ditch effort to hold the Bush states by trying to tear Obama apart.
Biden revealed what their narrative is going to be to jujitsu this: we might attack your policies but we won't question your motives or worth as a person. And I think that between having the issues on his side and the credit for being classy that he has built up with the American public over the past 18 months, Obama is actually to the point were many American voters are going to react negatively to people attacking him.
October 2, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Joe Biden is awesome. I think my wife can be very proud that he was her first choice for the nomination.
Strong, forceful, emotional - but not hokey or an asshole whatsoever. That's hard to pull off.
I'm sure the hard core of the Rapture Right loved it. The rest of the country? Not so much.
October 2, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, Biden was AWESOME. Can anyone in America not like this guy??? He was far more *real* than her sham, caricature of folksiness.
Second, this is a good point, and contrary to the MSM conventional wisdom:
"Palin's disastrous interviews raised expectations for her tonight, in the sense that the pressure on her to prove she's ready for the job was even higher than it otherwise might have been. And she didn't prove it, at least according to these early numbers."
I agree. She needed to dispell the negative image of her. I don't think she did. Reading notes, repeating talking points, not answering the question ... people who are skeptical will remain skeptical.
October 2, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
My hubby said that Joe Biden made he respect someone that has been in Washington for so long, he felt he was/is the real thing. That is good stuff from a guy who doesn't care about politics much.
October 2, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
While reading your comment I realized that people were going to be looking hard at Palin tonight and even though she didn't give us a comedy act tonight, because we were looking so hard we did see that she had no answers beyond talking points and wouldn't even answer the question most of the time. Now opinions on Palin are going to be even lower after reflection. She did not do well at all.
October 2, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think a good way to say this is that Palin's pre-debate meltdowns paradoxically lowered expectations but simultaneously raised "the bar" she had to clear in order to truly reassure people. Usually "the bar" a debater has to clear is simply the one of his/her expected performance. But in this case there were such concerns about her basic competence that she had lots more to prove.
October 3, 2008 6:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
bottom line: who got the sound bites?
hands down, biden. with the "he's not a maverick, and here's why" speech, with the "i haven't heard how mccain differs from bush on ____, i haven't heard how mccain differs from bush on ____," (etc.), and the choking up talking about his sons, it's biden that's going to get all the repetitive SERIOUS replays over the next few days.
her only replays are going to be, "i'm not going to answer the question you asked, but rather the question i PREPPED to answer" type crap. which will be picked apart and laughed at ... and parodied on SNL, by the way.
October 2, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
That last part is dead on. I'd bet money on it, Tina Fey will mock that "I pick the question I want to answer" silliness.
October 2, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goddamn I just fell right the fuck in love with Joe Biden tonight.
October 2, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hear ya. He has been on fire! I dig the combination of intelligence and working class chutzpah. I'd love to drink a beer with him! HA! ;)
October 2, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha ha! That's excellent, because if I still drank, that's who I'd pick - well, and Barack, for god's sake.
I've run into too many George W Bush's in bars in the days when I went in bars - bars in Texas anyway, are full of George W Bush. I never did want to have a beer with him - I know what he's like: Obnoxious Loser.
October 2, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the fact that they let her use notecards. What is this a high school chem test?
October 2, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Republican political veterans Ed Rollins and Carl Bernstein is not drinking the Palin Kool aid on CNN. Ed Rollins just said JM campaign team is not up to par.
October 2, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's talk about how this debate will excite the GOP base...but what about the Dem base? I think a lot of Dems are a lot more enthusiastic about Biden now than they might've been before. I mean no one disliked him but you can't deny he fired some people up.
October 2, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent point. Co-sign.
October 2, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Intelligent, but not condecending. Confident, but not cocky. Knowledgeable, yet simultaneously down to earth. In a word: real. Even Repubs who will never vote for Obama have to respect Biden...well, except for the extreme wingers, but there was never really any hope for them anyway.
October 3, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ill like to say Alaska also six pack also maverick also drill also also...
It was driving me insane, like finger nails down a chalk board every time she said some stupid gimmicky thing or said also.
October 2, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, especially "Joe Six-pack". I can't believe she actually used that. I know she was trying to appeal to the less educated, blue collar voter, but sheesh! People know blatent pandering condecension when they see it.
October 3, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, Palin is Bush-Redux, she sound exactly like George Bush. Her pronouciation of Nuclear is so freaking laughable.
Nu-clu-ear... This is going to be a great heat on SNL.
October 2, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, lets all watch her on SNL and send the cost of admission to a funny Broadway show to Obama. He deserves to benefit from her performance.
October 3, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
This debate reminds me of a long distance race. It doesn't matter if you cross the finish line first ...it only matters that you cross the finish line.
October 2, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
What Sarah Palin did tonight was help resurrect HER IMAGE, as in the image she will need in 2012 when she runs. What Biden did was FRAME MCCAIN with no sort of pushback from Palin. Biden literally had 90 minutes to tear McCain up and he did just that while making the case for the working class. That performance was............masterful. He is better than Obama at debating.
October 2, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, assuming she survives her term as Governor...
October 2, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin has about as much chance as Qualye had...none. Their claim to fame is thru their benefactor, not their ability.
October 2, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're kidding me. She is useless. My opinion hasn't changed a bit, she is dumb, if anything she is not only unintelligent she is also a big dishonest fake.
October 2, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Caribou Barbie, aka "Miss Wasilla 2004," was a programmed zombie, reciting talking points no matter WHAT the question tonight. Joe Biden was himself, relaxed, informed, passionate. Game, set and match, Joe Biden.
October 2, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once this debate is parodied on SNL Palin will go right back to being Dan Quaylized.
October 2, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Sarah is sure full of herself over at that post-debate party where she's still throwing out the jabs at Obama and Biden. I guess those digs are from the talking points written on her cue cards that she didn't get to spout in the alloted debate time.
October 2, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am very, very proud of Joe Biden. I think he did a fantastic job tonight.
October 2, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Me too. After several cycles of disapointing VP candidates (Lieberman, Edwards), Biden has really delivered. He was a great choice and a huge asset. And he will be a HUGE asset once they are in the White House.
October 2, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden was excellent. Sarah's better-than-expected performance will make no difference.
For McCain-Palin it's like the 1988 VP debate. A lot of folks said they liked Lloyd Bentsen better than Dukakis, they thought the ticket should have been reversed, with Bentsen on top. They liked him - but they still didn't vote for Dukakis. Same here. She doesn't help. If anything, she still hurts.
October 2, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I hear/read one more pundit applaud her for saying shit like "darn" or "doggone" or "shucks" (I don't even know if she said that one) I'm gong to fucking scream. We're electing a fucking president and vice-president here, not a freaking student council president. I don't think indies are going to buy it. The Corner is gushing but then, she's their gal - the only reason they're excited at all about this race is because of her...they hate and still dont' trust McCain.
She sounded like the Mayor of Wasilla with a handy notepad of neo-con talking points. America, please don't fall for this ruse.
I thought she looked nervouse, scripted, and general clueless. Biden looked like a guy who could step in a be president if need be. And that's the job of the VP. I hope voters saw the same debate I saw. Yeah, she didn't drool and fall down in convulsions. Yeah, she didn't look as bad as she did in the Couric interviews. But she sucked. I mean, she made Dan Qualye look good.
Is that everybody else's take? What are the pundits, snap polls (other than CNN), and focus groups saying.
And for the love of pete, enough with the baby prop. If the kid didn't have Down's Syndrome (and I'm of the opinion that if you know your fetus has Down's Syndrome, you should have the child - I'm pro-choice but I'm also not a woman so it wouldn't be my final call) he'd be in freaking bed. I think their exploitation of that infant is shameless and horrible. Do people outside of the fundie crowd fall for that silliness?
October 2, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the things Biden should have said re: VP's job is to step in as POTUS in a moment's notice. No way Palin could've responded to that and even if she didn't it would have made people think, "can I picture her as president-is she ready to 'step in'?".
October 3, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
After last weeks presidential debate, I posted a blog, spelling out my take on it.
I do not see the need for one on tonight's VP debate.
Here is the conclusion I was left with:
If American Elect Obama/Biden they will be getting two Presidents.
If Americans Elect McCain/Palin they will be getting, at best, three quarters of a President.
October 2, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
i am going to puke if i hear that she is "folksy" again. she didn't answer guestions!!! this is the only exposure that we are going to get to her (since she won't do press conferences) and she won't answer the questions. not a good showing for her and i think as people digest this it won't go over well with the electorate.
October 2, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of Palin's answers, which would have brought an obvious follow-up question in a different format was that she thinks the Constitution is flexible about the powers of a VP and she will try to expand those powers in Congress. Of course she is incorrect, because the Constitution is very specific in enumerating the powers of the VP - presiding over the Senate and breaking tie votes. Nothing more.
Another such answer was her reference to "surge policies" or "surge strategies", a meaningless term. The obvious follow-up is what are those?
She didn't wet herself, didn't fall down on the stage, her glasses stayed on. A successful performance for Palin.
October 2, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was the scary moment. You know darn well she never thinks about the Constitution. She's being tutored by the wingnut Cheney fringe. The economy is melting down and all they care about is how to abolish Article I.
October 2, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
She gets away with skirting around the laws in Alaska so why can't she do the same thing in Congress?
We've had the Decider for 8 years. If McCain and Palin make it to Washington, she'll be known as the Manipulator.
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can Palin please go away now?
October 2, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll hold the door open.
October 2, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will lock it afterward.
October 3, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
My favorite debate moment was when Palin said, "What are you looking at, sir?"
Biden said, "I'm looking at you, miss."
Then he rushed across the stage, took her in his arms, and said, "No matter how long it takes, no matter how far, I will find you!"
October 2, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
It only works if you have the avatar from Last of the Mohicans.
You have to understand - it's what he looked like - who cares what he said.
Ok, he said some cool stuff - I liked the line about "how is it you go west" and he says "well, I stand facing north and then turn left right quick."
October 2, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, loved Daniel Day Lewis in that movie. Worked for me, no matter what line.........
October 3, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know -- I loved that -- but not as much as when he said
"You've been driving me wild, you moose-hunting maverick! Let's go build a family of little mavericks together!"
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Where have you been?
October 3, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
:)
October 3, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I'm pleased with Joe's performance. Why go after Palin and attack her head on? The risks are way too high. Sure, 99% of the people on here would immediately agree with every point Joe would make (as would I), but then he'd be taking a huge, huge risk for very little gain.
Palin was already down near the dirt. She spoke like a human - an uber folksy twit, but a human - and showed people she's maybe not THAT dumb. But, Biden sounded knowledgeable and presidential...kind of like his senior mate.
Yeah, Joe got maybe too specific in the first half hour with numbers, but compared to all of Palin's platitudes and time-wasting talking points she was fed, I think he served the party well.
In three days, I see Biden and Palin going right back into the background with people's perceptions made up. a) I could stomach Biden as an alternative, b) no chance in hell do I want Palin.
October 2, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I gotta wonder: Did Palin's winks -- I counted three -- have the opposite effect of what she intended, especially with women? I found that jarring, cring-inducing. Anyone else?
October 2, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
She obviously was playing the folksy angle, which is the problem. If your obviously playing that angle you look cartoonist not folksy.
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't notice but wasn't watching that closely. Is there a video clip of this?
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palin-winks-at-amer_n_131457.html
October 3, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
O it was horrible. I said somewhere tonight - a woman who tried that in a job interview with a big lawfirm would be instantly shown the door.
October 3, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Somebody posted in a thread (can't recall which one), every time she winked the CNN's meter went down right away.
October 3, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking from a woman's perspective, I thought the winking was completely out of place in a vice presidential debate. It displayed her lack of respect for the event. Way too flirty, but then again the president of Pakistan might have appreciated those winks since he thinks she's so "gorgeous".
October 3, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hated the winks...and I can't imagine any woman who wants to be taken seriously thinking otherwise. It's like she falls back to the "I'm just so adorable I can hardly stand it" routine. It's disgusting.
October 3, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah and you know, women generally aren't thrilled with the thought that the career women their husbands spend time with get all adorable and winky with them.
October 3, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now that you mention it, I did notice that on that stupid tracker that CNN had during the debate, women definitely responded less enthusiastically to Palin then men did.
October 3, 2008 1:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Barack and Joe make a good, winning team. They have a vision where they want to take the country. They may not get us to the place in their vision, but it will be much better place than were we are now.
October 2, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCunBErZZJE&eurl=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/02/sarah-palin-has-an-eyelas_n_131442.html
You tube Palin wink song :)
October 2, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would agree, Biden waited until the end to really drive home his point. The last things talked about are the things average viewers will take away.
I think Nate's comment at 538 about Palin's teacher comment was great. That sound you heard was every teacher in America voting for Barack Obama.
Awesome.
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please McCain staffers use this moment to now put Sarah on the trail on her own. The unscripted Palin is such a sight to see, and more importantly hear.
She leads with her chin, and it only a matter of time before she walks right into a super gaffe that eats up three cycles.
Leading with that chin is already getting her some serious hits. Lying about the "94 times that Obama voted for tax increases...". The truth was 23 actual votes, 11 of those on people making more than 1 million dollars.
October 3, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Roger Simon is on MSNBC and he is totally drinking the right wing Kool aid. He has no credibility after his post last week after the BO-McCain debate saying that "The Mac is back" only to walk it back after everyone thought Obama won.
October 3, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Watch him and Buchanan walk it back again.
Once they see the polls.
October 3, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're not kidding. "Who knew she even knew what the constitution said about the Vice President?" he said. We're supposed to commend her for something every kid graduating from high school should know?
October 3, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know I am late to this party, but can anybody tell me what "changes" McCain/Palin are actually proposing? I mean at a policy level.
I think Biden took a lot of trite Republican talking points away from McCain tonight. The one on voting not to fund the troops was sunk. The notion of McCain being a maverick was beaten bloody. I betcha lots of people heard Biden's responses to the Republican talking points for the very first time, and recognized him as being a truth teller.
October 3, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right on point. And reform, reform, reform, to which I ask, reform what?! They never say what; they think American's are just stupid.
October 3, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
To me the news is that this was an opportunity lost for McCain/Palin. If she's the new voice designed to connect to average voters, this was likely her last, best opportunity to do it. Unless she shifts course and begins giving press conferences or can learn do interview well (with real interviewers), this will be the last connection voters will have to make with her and she blew it.
Voters have clearly shown that they view McCain as bereft of new ideas. Palin was supposed to change this. She didn't (at least not enough) in this debate. Will she make herself available for the press? Given that reputable journalists are likely to follow Gibson and Couric and follow-up when questions go unanswered -- unlike in this debate -- I doubt it. That leaves them with McCain to play tactics while he searches for a strategy.
If there's any lasting image from the debate it will be Biden connecting to voters with his emotional answer about his wife and daughter, followed by Palin's robotic, non-sequitur response. Yeah, she's folksy, but what the f*** is she talking about?
October 3, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
People have finally gotten really tired of bullshit and they can smell it coming a mile away. Palin comes across like a used car salesman. She's phony, overly dramatic, and people know she's pulling their leg. They're not buyin' what she and McCain are sellin'.
October 3, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does it not occur to them that people have had it up to the eyebrows with phony country accents? Haven't we all been listening to just that for 8 years? They are trying to repackage Bush for us and Biden was brilliant keeping on Bush.
October 3, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's not true. I for one love Bullshit. I mean, Penn and Teller are great! Oh, wait...you were referring to McCain/Palin. That's different.
;-)
October 3, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah's big night is soon to become a distant memory -- Judge Michalski just dismissed the lawsuit filed by McCain's cohorts seeking to end Trooper-Gate, and the judge upheld the Alaska legislature's right to issue subpoenas.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD93IMSJG0
October 3, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well yes, good for justice.
October 3, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Its interesting when Ifil asked about how they changed their opinions on issues over the years and Biden talked about SCOTUS and judicial philosophy, I think thats a little reminder to folks as to who is going ot be appointing at least one Justice.
I thought for sure he would have said voting for AUMF...
October 3, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops. I may have gotten the question wrong there...have to get the transcript. Still, the Supreme Court/Judicial philosophy bit is important.
October 3, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin did better than I expected, but Biden was really, really, good. Funny thing, I think Biden came of as more likable as well as more knowledgeable.
October 3, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are asking for the impossible...
October 3, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin struck me as part of a Disney-esque recreation of small town America. They get the look and some of the sound bites, but it's still a phony made out of styrofoam and glue, if you bother to look very deep or have much experience with the real thing.
October 3, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I called her a Stepford android first. My reaction to her was the same as the first time I watched the robot temptress dance in "Metropolis": horror.
October 3, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I was counting. I stopped in disgust after the fourth one.
October 3, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was supposed to be in response to Revilg's note about winks. They are horrible. Even if she were NOT speaking in plattitudes, the winks (accompanied by occasional nods) invalidate whatever she's saying.
October 3, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain was dropping in the polls and I don't think this debate did anything to slow him down.
October 3, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are several diaries on KOS reporting that the judge in Alaska has throw out Gov Plain request to halt Troopergate.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/2/233422/819/898/618449
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/2/233819/312/907/618456
October 3, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read that about Troopergate on some thread somewhere tonight- that's just too cool - it's like I have been one damn good girl this year that the universe showered me with all this -
October 3, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
WOW, Pat Buchannan is spinning hard for Gov Plain. I could see him saying she did well, but its way of a stretch to say she won.
October 3, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, even fox news didn't go that far. they called it a tie.
October 3, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
i almost died everytime here bangs moved as her eyes blinked. yuck.
October 3, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking as someone who went through changing her entire style in order to get employment, I just have to say that her hair, her makeup and her earrings are totally inappropriate for the position she is running for.
October 3, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. She has a real future on FOX.
October 3, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's great - she's running for VP - I said they were inappropriate for the office she's running for. I don't want a VP with bangs hanging in her eyelashes. I can do that now cause I can do any damn thing I want to. The VP of the US cannot.
October 3, 2008 2:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was absolutely blown away by Joe Biden tonight. Forget Palin and her faux-folksy "darn rights" and "you betchas." Biden exuded experience, vision, clarity and power. I don't think I could have asked for a better performance. He nailed it!
October 3, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
And may I add once again, she has lost in 'ing' at the end of words like startin', talkin', electin, etc., and she has all those teachers in her family. Betcha they are one hell of a group of bright ones.
October 3, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I got to the point where if she dropped one more "g" my head was going to explode. I thought it was possible she might push me to do something really stupid like kick something and end up putting a hole in the plaster.
October 3, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
They could be gym teachers. I'd say music but my high school music teachers were pretty sharp cookies.
October 3, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Palins strategy was to out middle class roots Bidens middle class roots.
I don't see how she will ever connect with the middle class. Joe is real, people understand him, and his life struggles are compelling. Palin comes across as a material career girl who never really gave of herself, only took for herself. Average people don't identify with that; they hold it as something to not become.
And her jab at the "east coast" well by tommorrow there will be some explaining of that one ( hello New Hampshire and Pennsylvania Sarah doesn't like you ). That is going to come back to haunt her.
And last of all, when your from Alaska you might as well be from Russia, this place is so far removed from the rest of the United States. Note how thin the stories of her life were. People hear Alaska and they think Baked. People hear Ohio they think America ( and hopefully a blue state in a few weeks ).
October 3, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, NOT a good tactic to look down on entire segments of the country...
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe this effectively ends the more brutal parts of the Palin side-show. It leaves on the table the issues, and how utterly unprepared either she and McCain are to deal with them.
I found her performance grade B community theater, Rush without the cigar, snarky, petty, try to wrest control of a situation that long ago gobbled her up and will soon spit her out.
To return to Alaska to face chrages that impeached Bill Clinton.
Meanwhile, Steady Joe will lead a Great Repairing of relations between Congress and the White House. It's what the country wants.
October 3, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lovely comment. *happysigh*
October 3, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Happysigh darn tootin!
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hate to disagree with all the Obamaphiles, of which I am one, but both Gwen Ifill and Joe Biden let Palin get away with murder and both were like deers in the headlights. Clearly, the McCain spin on Ifill worked and she was intimidated. Unlike her colleague Jim Lehrer, she never once called out Palin for straying from the question. Likewise Biden was overcoached to lay off Plain. If just once he had said: "Gov. Palin, I love your scripted answers, but just once please answer the question," he would have hit a home run. It's shameful they were both afraid of being caled out by the McCain campaign instead of being honest and forthright calling it like it was..
October 3, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. I think Joe absolutely hammered McCain (not Palin) when needed, and intentionally let her go with crap now and then. He didn't have to go after her about each and every piece of crap she vomited, because she didn't say anything substantive and say anything accurate, while Joe came across being strong, knowledgeable, and sincere. It's clear he knew what he was talking about while Palin read out directly from notes. Everything else was just slogans. That was enough for him to win handily.
That Palin cleared the low hurdle may have initially wowed some idiots on TV, but another narrative sets in in a few days and the media will probably examine what she said and how she behaved closely. Let them do that job. Biden didn't have to take any risk of coming across as condescending.
October 3, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well I don't what debate you watched, but Joe Biden was the very anti-thesis of a deer in the headlights.
LMAO
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
If they could have drilled a hole into Sarah's cerebellum and siphoned off some of her perkiness, they could have powered the eastern seaboard for several hours. Sarah Palin won my vote hands down-- for the next Fox-8 meteorologist (sorry if I've offended meteorologists). Or maybe she'll take over Elizabeth Hasselbeck's chair on The View, since the other girls are making her cry. I was surprised how reluctant the PBS commentators were to comment on her almost utter lack of concrete specifics, the empty, wordy content of her sentences, and her mangled grammar. Ah, those folksy winks! We've just got to stop greed! However, I was pleased to see her throw Bush under the bus; that will help when Obama starts running all his McBush ads to counter the inevitable Rovian smear campaign that Schmidt is planning. God bless America!
October 3, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin's bar, according to the MSM, was set so low, and she may have exceeded that, but that didn't change the fundamental fact that she sucks.
Ah, I'm so happy. I always liked Biden, but he was awesome tonight. Just awesome. Probably his best debate performance ever. And sane people must have seen it's a choice between one ticket of two intelligent, capable and sincere people and the other ticket of two incompetent liars. It couldn't be clearer.
I'm going to the Obama site to donate. I'm feeling so good!
October 3, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
maggie o'connell didn't come off as a complete airhead, which was in her favor.
but biden wiped the walls w/her in terms of substance, and in terms of actually addressing the points of the questions. more than once, after maggie o'connell finished talking, i said to myself, what was the question?
mrs. skippy said she sounded forced and rushed, as if she was trying to get out her memorized speech.
tho i'm sure her base will be in lurv w/her tomorrow, i think biden outdid himself, and the polls will be tipping yet even more in obama's direction.
October 3, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cokie Roberts on Charlie Rose was amused that Palin was going on about getting government out of the way when the bailout...which will steal tomorrow's headlines...is all about government getting very much in the way.
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
My thoughts on tonight:
Palin was:
* very nervous throughout
* incomprehensible on many of her "answers"
* very fake with her attempts at being a "joe-six-pack" (whatever the hell that is)
Biden was:
* On point throughout (attacking McCain)
* Very credible and likeable
* The Winner
Great points throughout the post everyone.
Tena, you rock, I'm a big fan!
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Spot-on. Even Tina Fey in mocking her prepared herself 1,001 times more professionaly than Sarah Palin. She is a complete disgrace, because after tonight it is quite clear she's smart enough to know exactly what is going on, and her role in it.
Yet, yea and verily, not smart enough to comprehend the damage she is doing to the process, her sugar daddy, and her broken and now busted party.
This is a woman on whom one never turns one's back. Ever.
October 3, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
it is obvious that she memorized certain phrases and talking points and shoved them in wherever she could. she didn't even try to answer the questions. since there will be no press conferences, how can we possibly trust her to be vice president. we haven't heard a single original statement from her and she isn't even close to educated enough to even take a stab a running for state office rather than vice president. she is a sad choice and an insult to women of intelligence. i'm sure she makes the unthinking conservatives feel better but for the majority of america she is a joke. game over.
October 3, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
There was an article EXACTLY about this happening. It talked about how Biden was being ignored so much he could very well steal the show. He did JUST THAT and boy am I fired up about it.
October 3, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a delightful moment...stayed up to watch it from France on CNN.
Biden? I'd heard of him, read some articles from relevant sources, but I had never seen him in a debate.
When Palin started talking, I thought "interesting, she does look more energetic and lively than Biden" who was initially not looking at the camera.
Then I realized that he'd been waiting, like a cat.
It was easy game for him. I also subscribe to the fact that the Couric interview did heigthen Palin's expectations, not the contrary. Biden was simply brilliant AND human. She sounded more like a jukebox fed on predigested notes, human indeed, but obviously unprepared for the job she's been choosen for.I mean she would'nt pass a University exam with such confused and off topic answers.
Whereas Biden would be her professor. And that's the way she looked when after the debate they were seen talking together, she looked like a student talking with a professor! (And then that baby propping, argh..... how can you fall in such a trap? Folksy my ass... Talking about family values, aren't babies supposed to sleep at this hour?)
I realized tonight that the Obama-Biden ticket was indeed offering two presidents for the price of one.
It's a perfect timing for the Dem ticket: more Joe Biden exposure is now guaranteed. There will be a Biden effect, which the media will chew on. People will want to hear and read more about that guy. Even the "modern" Reps are impressed, from what I hear and read. And the elections are only 5 weeks aways now. The probability is high that Palin will wear out before him (assuming she didn't get the final knockout tonight already, given the far reaching shockwave that Biden matter-of-factly delivered, with class and a smile).
I want more of Biden!
October 3, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well said and yes, MORE BIDEN!!!
October 3, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Us Biden-lovers long for the day when he takes on his role as liason to the the Senate, and Congress at large. This VEEP role is one the genius points we have received from the Founders, that need of one foot in both camps to keep the legislation moving.
There is a fine line between genius and crazed, obsessed rage, and Cheney's interpretation of the office is criminal at best, and amoral on the face of it.
The country needs that "grease the skids" role, and Biden is the man for the job. Obama was not thinking about a campaign of which he will thankfully soon be free.
He was thinking about how he was going to govern. For rudderless America, this is the face of The Captain, long absent from the wheelhouse.
October 3, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Guess what?! I've got a fever, and the only prescription... is more Biden!
October 3, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden had some powerful moments during the debate but what I will remember most about this debate is when Biden proclaimed what we Americans have known all along but were afraid to say: Cheney is the most dangerous vice president in this country's history. AND for Sarah Palin to agree with Cheney about increasing the vice president's legislative powers makes me even more convinced that she should never come close to the office of vice president of these United States.
October 3, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly..
McCain picked Palin for the show, whereas Obama picked Biden for the job.
October 3, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've always been suspicious of politician who favor a good show over sound(if sometimes boring) political views...
I have this haunting and scary image of the amazing shows the nazis pulled at home before WW2...
...The leaders adressing the masses directly... ...Manipulating them with populist (ahem, sorry, "folksy" is the new term "à la mode").
Putting on more "shows" when they got elected...
...While at war they also wanted to stay(a thousand years),saying victory was their only possible destiny.
The above comparison is not politically correct at all, granted! and I don't believe McCain and Palin share such extremist ideas at all... but...
...We do have a Rep ticket of Creationists who are willing to let us believe that Adam and Eve were hunting dinosaurs for breakfast.
Is THAT correct, politically or not?
If one's willing to seize power shamelessly manipulating that kind of ideological crap, you can expect the worst.
Whatever that may be...
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Blumenthal's analysis hardly matters and here's why. The debate between the Biden and Palin had different possible outcomes based on who the perceived victor was. For Obama-Biden there was very little upside to a victory. In essence, it would solidify preconceptions yet change few votes. Palin, likewise, was unlikely to cause voters to switch to McCain, or even go for McCain if undecided, if she exceeded expectations. For her it was the only possible shift was to the downside if she flopped. Otherwise, the old rules apply, the VP debate does not effect outcomes.
Now that we know that Palin can be prepped to plug in talking points, can we move on?
October 3, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Education of Sarah Palin
Great insights, everyone! I'm enjoying the read.
Sarah Palin came out of the gate right on cue. She took what she learned and used it in a way that made sense to her and, most likely, her handlers/teachers. I was impressed by her ability to remember key points and keep talking without breaking. About 10 minutes in, I acknowledged that she accomplished all she needed to and I was happy that she realized the gravity of the evening, took it seriously, and tackled it according to her capabilities. Women should be proud of just the mere fact that Palin met the task with gusto, stood on the same stage with a savvy, elder statesman, and did her best to show that she has some sense of intelligence....something I was worried (as a woman) that she would never truly pull off, given this week.
She failed to really answer any questions, she was typical in her deliberate diversions and staying "on point" in her own head. She was all style and little substance. After about 40 minutes, she was sucking the life out of me. I wanted her to breathe, I couldn't breathe, it was like she forgot to take her Ritalin. Bouncing around yet somehow saying the same thing, oxymoronic. I wondered when the chip in her head was going to short out.
Biden was superb. He was deferent yet firm with her. I think he paced himself like a seasoned professional, and I think he really hit his stride toward the middle of the evening and showed veracity. He made many dynamic points with eloquence that seemed effortless for him. I really appreciated when he brought his EXPERIENCE to the debate, that's what I was waiting for. And Darfur, I was gratified to hear his insistence to address the need for action. He brought the debate back to Bush, too, when we needed reminding (could have been a little more about Bush through the night, but I know it's a referendum on McCain in this forum.) And I never heard any "gaffes" from him. The solid Biden I have been watching closely and admiring since Anita Hill.
I think he proved to be the adult and the only one of these two qualified to be One Heartbeat Away from the Presidency. Palin's sophomoric approach and "folksiness" and scripted "digs" wore on me readily. And The WINK? TWICE? Jeesh.
She was outclassed by Joe Biden, but I still give her an C for her efforts, with extra credit for remembering the main points and showing up prepared. Oh, and not relying on "tears"... I was really worried she might have to pull that one out for tonight, and who knows HOW that would have resonated. So bonus points for standing "tall". Finally, thank you, Sarah, for scoring one major moment for Women, but the win goes big to Biden/Obama.
Oh, one more thing:
1. If you can't say NUCLEAR correctly, time after time after time like W., you can't have control of them.
2. Can't believe she actually said, "There you go again".
3. She shouted out to third graders... her peeps?
October 3, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am a woman, and a feminist, but i don't quite understand this:'
Women should be proud of just the mere fact that Palin met the task with gusto, stood on the same stage with a savvy, elder statesman, and did her best to show that she has some sense of intelligence....something I was worried (as a woman) that she would never truly pull off, given this week.
This sounds incredibly demeaning to women. Sarah Palin is an idiot. She is an idiot stereotypically, according to her gender, but an idiot nontheless. How she behaved tonight does not make me more or less happy or proud. Women are the intellectual equals of men. There are a lot of stupid men and stupid women. She's way out of her league. But that has nothing to do with her gender...
October 3, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is incredibly demeaning to serious women.
Sarah Palin is a complete insult to serious women.
You're a hell of a feminist.
October 3, 2008 2:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good fucking god - Sarah Palin has a degree is Sports Journalism she finished by mail.
She was waltzed into a position for which she is totally unqualified by an old man who needed a boost. She let herself be put in purdah, protected, handled, and handheld by that same dirty old man.
She is disgusting and she hates women. Every one of her stands on women's issues is anti-woman.
October 3, 2008 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
日本語を分かりますか.
October 3, 2008 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was meant to be a reply to Tena.
October 3, 2008 2:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
何テナでは最近おかしいのですか?私は彼女を過ぎるとそれ以降の滞在には男性が必要と思う
October 3, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
You tell'em Tena.....
October 3, 2008 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
This farce will soon be over....
October 3, 2008 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been a big fan of Biden ever since the hair plugs grew in completely (Joke! Joke!) and especially since he deflated the Guiliani bubble, or helped to, with the line, "Subject, verb, 911." And after his single word answer, "yes," to a question about whether he could control his loquaciousness during a primary debate, he had me completely. Plus, you know, he actually thinks and knows something.
October 3, 2008 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Smokin' Joe Biden! He done good.
It took me like 3 hours to watch the dang thing, because every time I got pissed off by a chunk of Palin nonsense I had to pause the dang tivo and froth for a while.
Looks like I picked the wrong night to quit sniffing glue.
October 3, 2008 4:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Palin says "ALSO" one more time someone should deepthroat her with that Alaskan pipeline
October 3, 2008 5:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't seen any reference to the "There you go, say it ain't so, Joe," zinger.
What exactly was that all about? It was entirely gratuitous.
October 3, 2008 6:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin get zero to no headway in my opinion tonight. Yes, if you don't pay attention to what was going on, she looked better than earlier in the week, but the only difference between what she said tonight and what's she's been reading off the teleprompter for the past month------is that tonight she just memorized the teleprompter! She only answered the questions she wanted to answer and then she was as articulate as any other parrot. She often just used her time to talk about anything she wanted to talk about. But that defeats the entire purpose of a debate. America wants to be able to ask and have answered tough questions. Gwen Ifill did a good job of not getting sucked into allegations of unfairness, but I was wishing for for Tim Russert. She wouldn't have gotten away with that junk without getting called on it if Timmy had been there!!!
October 3, 2008 6:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right. She demonstrated that she is coachable, not that she is competent.
October 3, 2008 6:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Team of Mavericks? Oxymoron?
October 3, 2008 6:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
She sounded like a right-wing moron to me. Her folksy persona can't hide the contempt for government. Maybe she thinks everyone just needs a gun so they can go out and get their own meat.
October 3, 2008 7:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad somebody mentioned the old "I'd like to have a beer with him" refrain. It's been almost 20 years since I could have a beer with anybody, but there is a certain working-class bar in Central Square, Cambridge, Mass (yes there are such...Cambridge is much more than Harvard and MIT...remember Tip O'Neill came from North Cambridge, as did Donald Regan!) where I should have a plaque on a bar-stool, or at least own stock, since I spent so much money there.
A lot of the regulars are construction workers (with a smattering of IRA types, some of them real), albeit of a leftist lean. I know that George W. Bush wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes in that place, being spotted for a preppy asshole with a phony folksy drawl practically the minute he opened his mouth. Those who would enjoy a beer with him say a lot about themselves, none of it good.
Ditto for Sarah Palin...she'd have gotten some hits but only the hardened skirt-chasers could put up with that chirpy voice, perma-smile, and Stepford repetition of the same answers no matter what the question was. If by some God-awful chance she should become President I will smash my TV set!
October 3, 2008 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did she sound like Marge the Cop in the movie "Fargo," or is it just me and everybody I know who thinks that she did?
"Ya see, ya got yer double homicide over here, and then yer high speed chase....you betcha!"
She went to six colleges in six years. That's change we can believe in!!
October 3, 2008 8:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
There are many points on which Palin's weakness can be proven, but I wish people would stop harping on how many colleges she attended before earning her degree. I have attended four colleges over the course of twenty years, mostly in the evenings after work. I will graduate with two AA degress this December and move on to the local University for my BA and ultimately my MA. The fact that Palin attended several colleges is not in itself a failure. Her clear lack of vision and understanding of policy is her failure.
October 3, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden was, without doubt, the outstanding winner.
Just putting up listening to the "screechy, cutsy, folksy" speel of Republican Talking Points (many of them lies and in very disconnected format) was grueling and definitely challenged one to keep their cool and stay on task.
Biden answered all most professionally and in the time slot allocated.
Obama/Biden 08!
October 3, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now if the repubs don't cheat (many of the corrupt voting machines will be used again this year), we just might win this thing!
October 3, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
This whimsey, folksey, eyewinking burst of banter; a bold fresh piece of Republican talking points tagger. Why could I not shake the image of Mary Tyler Moore, debating Lou Grant.
October 3, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
We all need to keep the pressure on the Obama camp, though. They still keep making fundamental mistakes by letting certain things go answered which can still be corrected and addressed starting now and with next week's debate:
1. Palin said last night and McCain has, too, that "McCain knows how to win wars". WTF? Really? Which wars has McCain won?
2. The Dems & Obama want to surrender in Iraq. They need to begin showing OUTRAGE over such an inflamatory insulting disgusting false statement.
3. They will increase your taxes. Simply say, "No. You will receive a tax break". Don't get caught up in the minutia of $250k limits. Just saying that statement ALREADY speaks to 95% of Americans.
There is still a LOT of work to do, folks.
October 3, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden answered #2 and #3 quite nicely last night. I think the best response to #1 is no response. The statement was silly on its face.
October 3, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is where he won, to me. Because there's no disputing that.
October 3, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
This should not be about whether Palin was better than what was expected. Or whether Biden did or didn’t wipe her off the table with his knowledge and experience. It’s about who will be the second most powerful person in Washington. People say the VP decision isn’t that important. I beg to differ. The second most powerful person in the US government and not seen as that important? Do you want to run your company with a good CEO but a CFO who knows nothing of how finances work? Or a COO who knows nothing of commerce? Maybe not.
So I looked at the two candidates with two questions in mind:
1. Who would best be able to help a President achieve the change he is promising?
2. Who do you want to make the decisions and represent your country if the President isn’t there?
That should be easy.
http://angryafrican.net/2008/10/03/biden-vs-palin-you-betcha-or-what-i-want-in-a-vice-president/
October 3, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whew. That's over... and thankfully my head didn't explode from Palin's over-rehearsed non-responses, sound bites, dialect, cutesy-ness and WINKS. What serious working woman seeking a higher level job winks at the interview?
What was with Palin's lack of response when Biden spoke of losing his wife and daughter, being a single father, and understanding struggling? She struck me as classless and cold to ignore what he said and go straight to non-response script.
Joe Biden on the other hand was terrific. He focused on Mccain as he should and made some great points. I have confidence he'll be a great VP, restore integrity to that office and be a great asset in the Obama administration.
October 3, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
in Joy P Rasin's post
- Prompting At The Debate -
She said she felt that Palin had a blackberry in her hand when she walked off the stage.
I didn't see the end of the debate, but if so...
muuuch better than index cards.
Also, people don't seem to mention that Palin has a communications degree. A degree that is all about the art of presentation and persuasion.
In my estimate she would have to have been a complete imcompetent to have this degree and not come off at LEAST as well as she did.
October 3, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I appreciate your response to my very first blog entry. Perhaps I wasn't clear in stating my observation, although you ended up kind of making my point at the end of your statement by saying "Women are the intellectuals of men":
"This sounds incredibly demeaning to women. Sarah Palin is an idiot. She is an idiot stereotypically, according to her gender, but an idiot nontheless. How she behaved tonight does not make me more or less happy or proud. Women are the intellectual equals of men. There are a lot of stupid men and stupid women. She's way out of her league. But that has nothing to do with her gender..."
I have great disdain for Palin. I am a woman and a child of The Feminine Mystique, too, and her presence in this race is insulting to me. Yes, she seems to be a dunce, and she IS out of her league. My wish simply was that her level (or lack) of intelligence would NOT come across as a stereotype of gender. I don't want her to be the standard for the future of women.
I feared her bad performance would perpetuate the stereotype of woman NOT on equal footing with man. I wanted her, with all her lacking and faults, to still, please, just don't act like a dumb blonde. Yes, in a way she did...but with conviction (that's meant to be a joke). Yes, she danced around the issues and "regurgitated" ideas. But she lasted through 90 minutes and gave the best she had as a communications major -- thankfully, there are differing opinions on what "her best" means. Regardless of her intentions or motivation, she did the best she could, and after watching her with Couric and Gibson last week, the debate WAS an improvement...of sorts.
I will say that she reminds me of the female executives with whom I have worked...always smiling when they talk, especially when being nasty or rude; using body language as tactic, using feminity as a weapon rather than an asset, less than truthful, emulating men (in a bad way) to seem powerful. Wolves in sheep clothing. But that's why they get where they get to, I suppose. They intimidate men AND women. Seems like they would rather be feared than respected, somewhat Machiavellian in their approach. Palin seems capable of this, which at the same time bothers me and intrigues me. With regard to intellectual equals? I find her to be the intellectual equal and soulmate of W. more than McCain. She fancies herself Cheney with more power, possessing the mind of W. I shudder....
But I still think her appearance at the debate is something Feminists would find of value.
October 3, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink