Colin Powell Endorses Obama
He just announced it on Meet the Press. More soon.
Late Update: Powell elaborated on his decision in a Q-and-A with reporters moments ago. He said he'd concluded that we need a "fresh set of ideas" and a "fresh set of eyes."
While he praised McCain's "maverick" ways, he added: "I think we need more than that," asserting that we need a "generational change" in leadership.
Powell said he'd arrived at his decision within the past couple of months.
Notably, he specified that "decisions that came out of the conventions" played a role in his decision, strongly suggesting that McCain's choice of Sarah Palin cost McCain the chance of Powell's support.
Also interesting was Powell's claim that the two men's response to the economic response played a role. He said that gave him an opportunity to evaluate the two men's "judgment" and way of "approaching a problem."
He praised Obama's "calm, patient, intellectual, steady approach to problem solving."
Late Late Update: Looks like McCain's robo-sliming didn't help matters much -- Powell also said on Meet the Press that they'd "gone too far."
Late Late Late Update: On CNN just now, Mark Halperin pointed out that one reason this is a big blow to McCain is that the press will talk about the endorsement for the next few days, cutting into the time McCain has left. I'd add that this also makes it much tougher for any kind of "McCain comeback" narrative to break through.
Still Later Update: Here's video of Powell's Q-and-A with reporters:
And here is Powell endorsing Obama on Meet The Press:

Ahem.
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR MCCAIN!!!
October 19, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah: now he can RETIRE!
October 19, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell is already retired.
October 19, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
The subject of the sentence to which I responded is McCain, not Powell. Then again, being for McPalin, you'll violate even basic rules of grammar in order to misrepresent the issue.
October 19, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent. This should add some spine to some of the fence sitters.
October 19, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Powell's endorsement has the potential to move some undecideds to Obama's side.
October 19, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes!
October 19, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Greg. Could you please post the statement ?
October 19, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
It went on for around ten minutes. I don't think one is officially out yet.
October 19, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's out on Huffington
October 19, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Andrea.
October 19, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell's endorsement of Senator Obama is a slap in the face to McCain personally and foreign policy wise. McCain is old, tattered and outdated he needs to go back to senate and concede this race to Obama.
October 19, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't want McCain back in Senate. I want him back to his Arizona ranch, with no cell reception and plenty of cactii to stumble on...
October 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there brush he could clear in Arizona? Maybe that would keep him busy.
October 19, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Frankly I'd like to see him sit in the stocks - like in the olden days. Then back to AZ.
October 19, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
No surprise there.
October 19, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
His statement that there is a need for a "generational change" is probably the only insightful and accurate statement he's made during his entire adult life.
Though I was first for Hillary, I saw that reality HAPPENING from the beginning of the primary season.
October 19, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I won't defend his Bush Loyalty, especially his UN speach.
But still, you give him far less credit than he deserves.
October 19, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Can you spell "My Lai" "Iran Contra" and "Iraq"?
I think it's swell for the Obama campaign that Powell endorsed him and it probably will influence some voters, all of which is good. As for the endorsement itself, however, given the timing and Powell's long history of under the radar self-promotion, I suspect that all it means is that Powell has finally decided that Obama is going to win.
October 20, 2008 8:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
countdown 'till powell is called anti-american...9...8...7...6...
October 19, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heh--don't forget "Well, he only did it because he's Black" which for their purposes is pretty much saying he's anti-American.
But you know, I wonder what all the wingnuts who said they wouldn't vote for Obama but "somebody like Colin Powell" because they don't "see his color" see now. I'll bet he got a lot "Blacker" in an eye blink!!
October 19, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fox morning show is already spinning it.
October 19, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
drudge already has that headline going: POWELL FOR OBAMA: IT'S NOT ABOUT RACE
October 19, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's unbelievable. I was just about to make a joke that Republicans would try and make this a black thing. These people are so sad.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
October 19, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
You all recognize the obvious but not the reality. Powell coming out directly effects retired (moderate/centrists) in the military, and college educated who are officially Independent or moderates on the Republicans.
He said that the party has narrowed (translated) excluded the moderates and centrists of the Republican Tent....meaning you are not part of the program.
Obama he stated had the mental state to lead the country while McCain he prosecuted did not.
Here i Colorado Springs it means it gives the country club/investor class Republicans the permission to vote in secret for Obama while identifying the Evangelical (cultists) and cultural warriors the remnants of the party to vote their unconscious conscience.
October 19, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Laughing. Drudge will do anything to spin right.
October 19, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who will be the first National Republican (and I don't mean Hannity) to mention that Powell and Obama are......pssssst, BLACK.
Obviously there's someone out there who is willing to go there. I can't wait for that moment. It might be as damaging to the remaining shred of their party's credibility as Bachmann's "Anti-American Congressmen" comments.
October 19, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with that remaining shred of credibility is that that shred is a lie.
NOT credible as credibility.
October 19, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm betting on Sarah Palin ....... said in a warm, motherly tone as if "well, of course, THEY want to support one another"
October 19, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup Yup, you betcha!
Good one Elizabeth2.
October 19, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, the obvious ploy and I'm not at all surprised that it's already in play. They've probably been all set to pull that trigger since the buzz on this started last week. SOOOoooooo predictable, these asshats.
October 19, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
After helping that swine Stevens in Alaska, he had better.
I am glad he made this move. I hope this is helpful among those who still hold him in high regard. And the fact of the matter is that he was part of the current administration--so that's gotta hurt.
But I'm more impressed that our campaign raised $150 million last month. And at least in the DC burbs, they keep running the comments about "real Virginia" while noting that he had Klanpaign event (OK, so that's my word) in Woodbridge...which--yup yup, you guessed it--is IN northern Virginia.
October 19, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
You ruined the surprise! I'm up early today and I was going to watch it in suspense. That'll teach me to read blogs on Sunday morning.
That said, I'm wondering how relevant this guy really is. I mean, people might remember, but there's no way he's going to get as much coverage as Joe the plumber.
*sigh*
October 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the people that have lost faith in Powell are pretty much already on board with Obama. It's the type that are more open to Powell that are still sitting on the fence. My sense of it is: If you felt betrayed by Powell, why would you entertain the possibility of McCain as your man?
October 19, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right you are CarolBG. Powell influences Republicans and independents.
October 19, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
With this and the fundraising announcement, Obama is going to pwn this newscycle. McPalin is going to be left gasping.
October 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Colin Powell.
October 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dirty pinko librul Powell. Why does he hate America?
October 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, now he can also just refer to Powell as "That One":
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/that-one.html
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
"That One"
What a very odd thing for McCain to say.
McCain repeatedly invoked the need for a "steady hand on the tiller" tonight--for someone who will be calm and cool in the crises that the upcoming years will present us.
Yet this is a man who is utterly unable to contain his contempt--even on a night when, even as Bill Bennett says, he needed to "break through", and even when such a strange expression of disdain could only highlight pettiness, anger and partisanship that voters wish that candidates would steer away from in the greater interest of the nation.
McCain's fundamental position--one from which he finds his momentum and meaning--is so often one of a contemptuous anger for those who do not understand what he believes he has learned--e.g., "them".
This is the impulsive, gut-driven, black and white thinking that we have seen throughout the campaign.
We have had 8 years of a President driven by impulsive, black and white, gut-driven, categorical thinking. In those 8 years, from a position that manifested from the very start an angry, assumed knowledge, and a contempt for the position of others, we have now seen the results.
So this time: choose that one.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/that-one.html
October 19, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is quite wonderful.
The chickens are really coming home to roost with McCain. There is a great article on Huffington about how the impulsive Palin choice, like so many of McCain's quick decisions----running to Wall Street, "That One"-----are dragging him down.
Now, with Powell, the rationalists come out.
And on the right side.
Love it.
October 19, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
From:
State of Head
http:// stateofhead.blogstain.com/pretentious
October 18th, 2008
Since last we heard, Robert Hewson has decided to engage the readers of Talking Points Memo in Election Central instead of merely dumping in toto his latest blog post on the latest thread:
TPM Poster (hereafter known as “TPMP”)- “Geez, finally you decided to stop all your spamming on the threads…”
Robert Hewson (hereafter known as Tucker Bounds)- “I invoke my First Amendment Right to free speech just like everyone else here.”
TPMP-“Dude, we simply wanted you to stop spamming the threads with your entire blog post. Why can’t you just give us a taste of it, the link and be done with it?”
Tucker Bounds- “I have every right to post anything I want no matter how literary, intelligent, and prescient I think it may be even if I never respond to anyone else on the thread. Especially if I don’t respond to anyone else on the thread.”
TPMP- “Whoa there, Hoss. Is it too much to ask for you to do what many TPM readers have asked in the interest of promoting community? I come in peace, love, understanding and a Hope for Change We Can Believe In.”
Tucker Bounds- “I didn’t know there was a large group of people who found my spamming inappropriate because I was busy trying to get to the next website where I could dump it. Nevertheless, I will subject the entirety of my blog posts to anyone who reads the thread just like your posts, as ill-informed and low-brow as I deem them to be, no matter what because I’m special and my pointy head is obviously sharper.”
TPMP- “Hooo Kaaaaay……”
Conclusion: State Of Head? Pretentious.
Shite:
http:/ stateofhead.blogstain.com/pretentious
October 19, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeek. Snark. Ick. To each his own, I always say. Really adds nothing, the snarkiness. I love his stuff.
October 19, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, I find your stuff kind of well...want to be kind..but um...not that good? Like the above, with it's silly McCain-like negs and um...childishness?
But I read it or--god forbid--scroll over it--and somehome endure it. Don't know how...my poor little fingies.
Self appointed guardians usually have tiny...principles. Enjoy what's around you, avoid whatcha don't. Good rule for life.
October 19, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was for LBJ's Brain (:
October 19, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
To each his own ;)
October 19, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly! Now *that's* the spirit!
October 19, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's clear that RH has not only felt compelled (likely via a threat to ban him) to now engage, but he's clearly spawned a sidekick troll to respond to him)
Just a reminder: Don't feed either troll.
October 19, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
You don't like snark, yet you hang around TPM Election Central?
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good for you....go visit his blog, then.
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Which was the entire point of the discussion in regards to RH's long, long, long pieces. He's not even on topic today. This thread is about Powell, but our intrepid spammer is talking about the implications of McCain's temperment in the debate last week.
To each his own, sure, but why not just include the link and be done with it?
This is Josh's website, not a forum for promoting your own website, however wonderful it may be. Come on. This is basic stuff.
October 19, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign LBJ. And I find you quite funny.
October 19, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aw shucks.
Back atcha!
October 19, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
We love you! Especially back with your "normal" avatar!
October 19, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I take back what I said about Powell yesterday. Good for him.
October 19, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gladly take back everything I've said about Colin Powell since his "vial of white powder" moment at the UN five years ago.
October 19, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
After Powell's performance at the U.N., he should take MacArthur's advice and "just faded away". Either he was in on the plot, or he exercised poor judgment as 4000-plus can attest--either way, I don't consider his endorsement to be beneficial to Obama.
And, God forbid, he gets a position in the Obama government.
October 19, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not beneficial? I disagree. This is all about winning the news cycle for the next 2 weeks. We are way ahead in the polls, and McCain needs a game changer. Obama continues to suck up airtime, and next thing you know, it will be Nov. 4th. Unless disgruntled anti-War Democrats desert Obama in droves because of the Powell endorsement, this will be helpful. Many independents (sadly) still hold this guy in very high regard.
October 19, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
When asked if he would serve in an Obama administration if asked, he avoided the question several times, then said he has no desire "to rule again".
Um . . . when did he "rule" in prior stints in the White House?
October 19, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
He actually said, "I'm not anxious to rule it in again."
October 19, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good for Powell. Bad for the neocons, their buddy McW, and the roaches in the McW camp with their slimey challenges of Obama's concern for this country.
October 19, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's the least Powell could do. I'm still angry at the way he betrayed us over those WMDs.
October 19, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wait a minute! Another anti-American??
Bachmann list keeps on growing!
October 19, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell even took a shot at Bachmann.
October 19, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really?
October 19, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, not by name -- which means she won't know he was slamming her unless he decides to call her out by name.
October 19, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
This pathetic cow finds anyone who is opposed to her mindset "anti-American". I'll grant that it's nothing new for right wing loons and I'll grant that "mindset" implies there is a mind involved as opposed to a parrot-brain.
She's a dangerously pitiful thing.
October 19, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The adults are the so-called anti-Americans. Those who think with their animal brains only are the mcShame folks. Here's a post I just did after seeing the light of what the mcShame campaign is all about:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/therap/2008/10/mcshame-campaign-in-a-nutshell.php
It's why the adults vote for Obama. And how mcShame arouses passions to incite/excite his followers.
October 19, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Forget the Powell Buzz, McCain Receives Endorsement of The National Enquirer
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=4133
October 19, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hahahahahaha.
October 19, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not know if Powell will help but it show how the right wingers are starting to abandon McCain.
October 19, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell, whatever you may think of him, isn't part of the "right wing." He's a traditional conservative -- the sort of person who has been abandoned by the GOP in recent years.
As such, his endorsement is probably of little interest to the Six-Pack Palin base, but of considerable interest to the kind of people turning up repeatedly in anecdotes from the field -- the older white person who tells a canvasser, "I've always voted Republican, but...."
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Key at this moment is older white voters. At present, their indecision is McSlimer's floatation device. If they go Obama -- and there has been indication some are, McSlimer sinks. Powell will tell those voters: "Vote Obama," and most will obey him.
Strange values that they would have faith in the word of a world-renowned serial liar.
October 19, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I work for people like that.
October 19, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
In his Q&A just a few moments ago, he noted the negative tone of McCain's campaign as a big reason and concern. He systematically debunked every McCain-Plain talking point.
October 19, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Spectacular. Will make the editing job for FOX more difficult (:
October 19, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
For some reason "Duffle Bag Boy" is running through my head right now.
Also, did anyone notice that SFC Wallace went AWOL about two weeks ago?
October 19, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
SFC must be eating bullets right now.
October 19, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been looking at the angry mobs at the Palin rallies to see if I could spot him.
I assumed he would be wearing a tee-shirt that says "I'm with stupid" with the arrow pointing to himself
October 19, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
ROFLMAO
October 19, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, you know, there's a lot of reasons that I felt that Obama was philosophically aligned with Powell, but I increasingly suspected that McCain's erratic behavior in this campaign would not sit well with Powell. My only reservation was whether Powell had the balls to come out and state his position. I'm glad he did. The need for moral, principled choices should overrule loyalty to one's tribe. Powell let us down in a big way during his run w/the Bush administration. I'd like to see him speaking out more in the coming years and supporting positions when they are the best course of action, even if they are unpopular with his Party.
October 19, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Moral?
Powell was the first to investigate -- and cover up -- the My Lai massacre. That he would lie for his party -- put it ahead of his country by helping it lie the country into war -- is the substance of whatever "character" he might be said to have.
October 19, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK, JN, so as far as you're concerned, there's nothing that Powell could ever do that would serve as a positive contribution to this country ever again?
Did you ever have any positive regard for this man?
October 19, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had no fondness for him way back then.
I have revisited My Lai in my head many times since I'm now older than dirt.
Lt. Calley was in his 20's. We are sending kids into the same situation today. These children can go nuts, too.
Hell.
October 19, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
OT but..
Hey, did anyone see Chris Wallace of Fox news ask McCain some tough questions with quotes directly from him in the past regarding specifically Ayers and robocalling. I've got to give props to Chris for asking the tough questions nobody else has.
October 19, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Chris Wallace is the closest thing to a true journalist over at Fox. It's in his DNA.
October 19, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's in his DNA to fall just short of being a journalist.
October 19, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is Condi going to endorse BO? Can we get 2 for 2?
October 19, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would not be helpful. Besides... she's still in the bush admin.
October 19, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
One torture-planning war criminal's endorsement is more than enough.
October 19, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
October 19, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
If I were to guess, I bet she'd like to endorse Senator Obama but probably considers it inappropriate.
I did not think Colin Powell's endorsement would be a very big deal...
After listening to his very thoughtful reasoning I do think it is a great boost for Senator Obama with republican's who would like to vote for Senator Obama but have been sitting on the fence.
He refuted the Ayers association... the negative tactics he associates with the republican party and not McCain personally stating the party was moving too far to the right. He stated that Senator Palin is NOT ready to be president. Having these on air is great for the Obama campaign.
More please... If more republican leaders want to step up and join the campaign... the doors open.
October 19, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I meant Governor Palin of course.
October 19, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
God, I hope NOT.
October 19, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who will be next?
Chuck Hagel? George Will? Mr.Puddles?
Still, I feel fine about it.
The one who make me dropped my jaw was the 150 million raised in September.
150 MILLION DOLLARS!
A warning: This is not over yet. Donate, volunteer, vote! A landslide is only possible if we all make it happen!
October 19, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll be doing my part this afternoon canvassing. :)
October 19, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sweet. Thanks!
I knocked on doors in NH yesterday (which seems pretty solidly blue now), and had a blast. I'm back home in CT today (Obama country!) and will be calling VA today. And I will definitely be using Powell as a key part of my spiel when talking to Republican leaners and undecideds.
Thanks Gen. Powell, you're almost back on my good side.
October 19, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL at Mr. Puddles, Geha.
Agree. It ain't over until the angry man yells.
October 19, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
In his post interview comments, Powell mentioned "some of the decisions made at the conventions" (a not too veiled swipe at the Palin choice) and the utter nonsense in today's GOP like Bachmann's deranged screed as reasons for his decisons. Say what you want about the man, but I'd still rather have someone with his gravitas on my side.
October 19, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
No thanks: I don't want a pro-torture war criminal NEAR me, on EITHER side, and ESPECIALLY not at my back.
October 19, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has repeatedly singled him, (Powell), out for lavish praise. In a July New York Times interview, McCain described the former secretary of state and Joint Chiefs chairman as "a man who I admire as much as any man in the world, person in the world" when answering a question in which Powell was not brought up. Meanwhile, near the same time as that interview, McCain was reportedly considering Powell as a potential running mate.
McCain's high opinion of Powell as one of the "most credible, most respected" men in America is not merely an election-year spasm, either. When asked in 2001 if he would have chosen Powell for a Cabinet position had he succeeded in his first presidential run, McCain said "oh, yes." During two December 2000 appearances on NBC Nightly News, McCain described himself as "exuberant" over Powell's selection as secretary of state, which he predicted would secure "a beneficial effect on the conduct of American foreign policy."
McCain added in another TV appearance that President Bush was "blessed" to have Powell working for him. In 2003, when Powell faced criticism from Newt Gingrich over his plan to travel to Syria, it was McCain who rose to the secretary's defense on MSNBC's Hardball, when he said: "I think it's appropriate that Colin Powell is going there."
Even at the end of Powell's somewhat frustrating tenure in George W. Bush's inner circle of policy advisers, McCain praised his overall performance, saying: "When he took the helm at the State Department nearly four years ago, I was confident that Secretary Powell would lead with honor and distinction ... I have not been disappointed."
And in a CBS interview during this year's primary race, McCain suggested that one of President Bush's chief failures "was not to listen more to our military leadership, including people like General Colin Powell."
- from HuffPost
HAHAHAHA....let's see McSlime wriggle out of this one. Any criticism of Powell and he'll have his own words thrown back
in his ugly chipmunk-on-crank face...HAHAHAHA...it's over, McScum. Now, fuck off.
October 19, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
That should make for some nice ads. mcShame endorses Powell, who endorses Obama.
Karma. I love it!
October 19, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell must have really loved the roving camera outtakes of the Palin rallies in Johnstown and Allentown.
October 19, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
A redemptive moment for Powell. Regardless of what you think of him, this was a good thing to do. And his stature is still great among most Americans. He could have been president himself. And he is putting his stature behind Obama, firmly. His calling out the Repugs and Michelle Bachman personally on their hateful extremism was excellent!
October 19, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
October 19, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is an excellent summary--it is redemptive, and he is using what's left of his ol' Presidential juice on this. Nice post.
October 19, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right on. We all make mistakes, and although our mistakes don't lead to people getting killed, as Powell's did, we all deserve a chance at redemption.
October 19, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
How many instances of cowardace and lack of character must Powell show before one becomes a bit hesitant to adopt amnesia in his behalf?
Before one volunteers to be morally complicit in those instances?
October 19, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is politics, JN. There's a wide spectrum of people out there, with a wide spectrum of beliefs about how best to serve this country. And those who choose to serve and to lead are human and sometimes they commit errors in judgment. Even when you don't agree wih people, or maybe just don't like them, it's of benefit to be able to work with them.
Rigidity may make you feel good about where you stand, but it can screw you over when you have to actually make something happen.
October 19, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now lets see who the righties pick to attack Colin Powell.
I can't wait to hear the racial spin that pill popper Limbaugh has come Monday. How will Faux News try to downplay this?
I give Powell credit. He didn't do a NYT open letter, he didn't release a statement, he made it personal by going on MTP.
Beyond the endorsement I love how he described his own party as having become too extreme. Well if that wasn't a stab in the hearts of the neocons...
October 19, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
He would have had grater impact, and reduced the damage, if he'd had the moral balls to resign and make his statement when there was possibility of putting a stop to it. Instead, he participated in planning and imposing the war crime of torture.
October 19, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll say. I don't give one shit about Colin Powell, but I'd much rather have him endorse Obama than McLame.
October 19, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are missing the significance of this endorsement. This is a big endorsement.
October 19, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
May I ask why you care?
I don't think I'm missing it - I don't like Powell and this doesn't change that.
October 19, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I lost all respect for Powell after the UN speech in February of '03.
Powell just brought the robo calling to national attention and the ridiculousness of tying Obama to Ayers. His opinion is significant to military families and the military culture. Powell further weakens the "Obama is not experience enough" meme. He is validating Obama as a commander in chief.
October 19, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
If he solidifies only 1-2% voters who are weak Obama supporters, that good. If he changes the minds of only 1% of voters, that's good.
October 19, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Have you been looking at the tracking polls?
McCain's numbers have been trending up, Obama's have been trending down. The robocalls and the nastiness have been working, for whatever reason. (And I think that the reason is simple: the ACORN story combine w/Ayers is enough to ignite suspicion and fear--very powerful motivating factors in a decision-making process).
But that's the McCain/Palin/Bush campaign's last shot. And they got gamed into making it too early.
What's instructive is to look at how the Obama campaign responded: challenge the facticity and factiousness of the ACORN story--and get it explained about how ridiculous it is, and let the pictures of the McCain/Palin supporters diffuse themselves across the i-net.
Then, and only then, Powell's endorsement appears. (And I don't buy for one second that this wasn't coordinated--it was the least well kept secret of the Obama campaign this week).
Whether the folks on the denizens of TPM like Powell or not, he is immensely well-respected in the rest of the country. As for that horrid speech to the UN, I think you can chalk that up as a defining moment for Powell's career--and not in a good way for one who wanted to succeed in Bushianna-stan.
Conclusion: even in high-stakes political campaigning, Obama manages to knee-cap his opposition by taking the high-road.
October 19, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hepular, another panicking Democrat. This get's old.
October 19, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I try to avoid ad hominem responses, BUT
in re: to theone718, you misread my post.
So, here's a shorter version:
The fund-raising #s and the Powell endorsements constitute a powerful and exceedingly well-timed response to the mendacity and demagoguery being retailed by McCain/Palin.
Instead of panicking, I'm actually fairly well impressed not just that the Obama campaign has an answer for the McCain/Palin foolishness, but at how positive that response actually is.
October 19, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought your first explanation was great - I don't know why people are so mean on blogs - just because of anonymity! I see the strategic angle.
October 19, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Working on a small group: Joe the Plumber men. Think about it. Then check the R2K internals. White. mid 30's. Resentful. Attracted to the sex and violence mcShame incites.
October 19, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Powell's endorsement was not coordinated with the Obama campaign. And, great, Powell is respectable to SOME military familes, and a segment of the civilian population -- to those who don't know his history, or refuse to look at it -- and his endorsement is what they will need to decide to vote Obama.
But that does nothing to redeem Powell for his decades-long lack of moral backbone and moral character. He "closed the deal" for the Bushit criminal enterprise's drive to lie the country into illegally invading and occupying non-threatening sovereign nation Iraq -- despite his knowing he was lying, despite his knowing he was throwing the lives of his troops away, for a lie, and for a lost cause.
At least hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians are dead as result.
He participated in the planning and imposing of the war crime of torture. That demolished the US's moral standing in the world. That VOLUNTARILY handed Osama bin Laden a moral victory.
That undermined national security.
That's Powell. The same Powell who was the first to investigate -- and cover up -- the My Lai massacre.
You needn't wait in line behind me to kiss his ass because I won't be in that line.
October 19, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena your statement is offensive. I am sick of fucking liberals trashing someone as respected as Colin Powell. It's deplorable. This is the EXACT fucking reason rethugs call us unpatriotic......."General betrayus" and bullshit like that is DEPLORABLE.
October 19, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell participated in the planning and imposition of the WAR CRIME of torture.
Torture is prohibited always and everywhere. It cannot be made legal. Effort to make it legal are also illegal.
There is nothing RESPECTABLE about torture, or about those who participate in planning and imposing it; and support and defend it.
And it would be impossible for me to care LESS what Republicans -- real and ffake -- think of me as concerns my moral refusal to respect scum such as Powell. He is only respectwrothy to fools and apologists for the unconscionable.
October 19, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh boo hoo. Get over your Passion of the Powell mindset.
October 19, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's Powell making his endorsement:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27265490#27265490
October 19, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gov Plain is sinking McCain. The maverick took a gamble and it is now bitting him in the butt.
October 19, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
He didn't pick her - Rove did.
October 19, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Double down on that.
October 19, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yesterday, writing about the rumor of the endorsement at DagBlog, I wrote:
In retrospect, I think that the endorsement is biting in its criticism of McCain but not "full-throated" in the sense it Joe Undecided will just clear his throat and move on to the sports scores.
October 19, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
The way he spoke. It seemed so close to the Obama campaign. I'm guessing it was restrained for that reason.
October 19, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should have included the next sentence in my self-quote: "But I don't think that's Powell's style."
Powell sounds like himself. He's not an excitable guy. The content of his remarks is actually damning, but he delivers it in typical measured tones and with typical caveats. I respect him for it; I just don't think it will have a massive soundbite impact. Note that he said that he did not plan to campaign for Obama.
PS I thought that his comments on Muslims were outstanding. It's about time that someone of his stature made the point, and he was incredibly eloquent.
October 19, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell just used the Leveler spell against John McCain. :D
October 19, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad that Powell endorsed Obama.
I'm just sorry that he forever besmirched his reputation by going to the United Nations in 2003 and blatantly lying to the world about Saddam Hussein's supposed (and nonexistent) weapons of mass destruction.
Basically, Colin Powell lied (knowingly or unknowingly) for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. He may have been pressured into it, but he still did it.
Ultimately, he is a lying, motherf-cking punk who with his cowardice allowed Bush to press forward on an illegitmate, preemptive war.
Colin Powell is no hero. He is an accomplice to Bush's War on Iraq. He may not have wanted it, but he acquiesced to it. He is a cowardly punk. He doesn't resign in protest. He goes along with the idiocy. Sorry, Colin, you f-cked up big-time when you went along with Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld.
You could have been a "MAN" and said "I won't go along with this lying shit," but you didn't. Instead, like the good millitary man you are, you swallowed the shit and said, "Yes, Mr. President." Even though you knew in your heart and in your gut that he was wrong.
Sorry, General Powell, but that makes you just as culpable as the rest of these assholes for the War on Iraq.
You, sir, are an honorable man -- and at the same time, an abomination for what you allowed to happen with your U.N. speech and your ultimate support for the stupidity of the War on Iraq.
October 19, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Including Biden!
October 19, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Correction
Including Biden?!
October 19, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Get it through your head, TROLL:
Congress was LIED to, exactly as were the rest of us. Congress was given ONLY the intelligence that "fit the policy".
STOP defending the indefensible Bushtit criminal enterprise, unconstitutionally appointed by a corrupt SC 5.
October 19, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, JN, we get that you don't like Powell. But, TonnyB is a regular poster here and is not a troll. We try to maintain a tone of respect for the opinion of others around here. How about joining us in that effort.
October 19, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Et tu, Powell?
Et tu, North Dakota?
Et tu, North Carolina?
Et tu, Virginia and Missouri?
The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves.
The Republicans have no one to blame but themselves.
October 19, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very, very true.
October 19, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, now I'm putting the champagne on ice, ready to be chugged on the evening of November 4th. HAPPY DAYS ARE (almost) HERE AGAIN!!
October 19, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've got to wonder how much help this is going to be for Obama.
While any endorsement is good, this one is from a man who willingly stood in front of a world audience and lied. He may have been uncomfortable doing so, but it didn't stop him.
I think the $150,000,000.00 will have a greater impact.
October 19, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't kid yourself. This is HUGE. A major figure in the Republican Party has (1) slammed John McCain's jugment, temperament and decision-making; (2) slammed Sarah Palin; (3) slammed the sleazy campaign being run by McShame, specifically citing the robo-calls and "terrorist" smears; (4) slammed the Rethuglican Party for its rightward shift; and -- last but DEFINITELY not least -- (5) endorsed Barack Obama in the most specific, positive way. This full-throated endorsement will, among other things, likely help the state of Virginia -- a state full of both active and retired military -- to Obama.
October 19, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really hope you are right Doofus. I just watched the video, and it was clearly an endorsement and not just "fence sitting." Still, he used a lot of awfully big words, that a lot of the neocons/repugs. aren't going to understand. Doesn't change my thought that his endorsement comes with a lot of taint.
As someone upstream noted, I think the biggest benefit may be to usurp the news cycle for a day or two, of the few remaining days of this race.
A reminder, Texas early voting begins tomorrow. Obama gets at least one vote in Texas tomorrow!
October 19, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
But as others have pointed out, those of us who have bad feelings for Powell because of his role vis-a-vis Iraq are ALREADY in the Obama column.
The impact of this endorsement will be upon those who -- like Powell himself -- initially supported the war and now have come to realize it was a mistake. There are a lot of these people, and many are traditional Republicans inclined to support McCain. Powell's words should encourage some of these people to feel that it's okay to vote Democratic this time around.
October 19, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
"You break it -- you own it." -- Powell.
Powell -- and Rice -- before even 9/11 said that Iraq was not a threat. When he lied to us, the Congress, and the world, he KNEW he was lying. He KNEW Iraq wasn't a threat. He KNEW he was throwing the lives of his soldiers away for a lie, for a lost cause.
The deaths of at least hundreds of thousands later, he is redeemed by endorsing one candidate against another in an election campaign? You're kidding, right?
October 19, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, views on Powell are really extraneous to the issue right now, but has anyone stopped to think what GWB might have done in his first term if Powell had NOT been there? I've always had more respect for those, like Powell, who stay in place and try to exert what influence they can than I do for those, like Palin on that energy board or whatever it was, who leave in a big huff, patting themselves on their back. Powell addressed this aspect this morning when he said, with emphasis, that it was never a situation where he could have changed the course of events by leaving. Try thinking about Bush, Cheney, Rummy, et al. sitting around the table cooking up plans with *no one* saying "I think you ought to consider this other possible outcome...." or "There will be strong resistance to that..."
October 19, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
EXCELLENT POINT!
October 19, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I just watched the video. Powell has redeemed himself! Could there be a more powerfully spoken endorsement? I'm blown away! I have tears in my eyes.
October 19, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
O darlin, Powell is going to have to do a lot more than endorse Obama to redeem himself.
He could tell do that by telling the truth about the war and the administration but he's not going to do that.
I'm glad he endorsed Obama - it's a good thing. I can imagine that John Mcain is fit to be tied.
But that doesn't redeem all the damage Powell has done - not for me, anyway.
October 19, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto.
October 19, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he at least took a step in the right direction toward redeeming himself. If at all these bastards have to stand tall before the Man for pushing this war on the world, hopefully Powell will be a star witness, testifying in exchange for a reduced punishment for his unfaithful execution of his office and violation of the public trust.
The man's most certainly a coward, but even cowards can change.
October 19, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell certainly owns culpability for the Iraq War (as do the majority of Americans - myself unfortunately included - who supported it), but I am noticing one possible thing here.
I presume (and I stress "presume")that most of the hostility directed at Powell is for his support of the Iraq War (at the very minimum, this plays a very large part).
Commenters here are certainly correct in continuing to hold his [Powell's] feet to the fire for this, but I think it's a bit overwrought to be so completely unforgiving given that we've all forgiven (or at least are choosing to overlook) Biden on this. He did support this sucker too.
October 19, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said. The man has blood on his hands, as do all of the Bushies.
I will admit though, his endorsement speech for Obama was quite detailed, with enough talking points to counter McCain's vile shitslinging.
Hopefully this will give the MSM something to chew on for a few days.
October 19, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I imagine he will tell all, eventually, but it will be when this is all history. I find what he did terribly sad. But, I wecome the endorsement, nevertheless. And I still believe that he is, at his core, a decent man who did a terrible thing.
October 19, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some may disagree with the level of redemption, but Powell has clearly stepped forward in a very meaningful way for which he clearly deserves some credit. McW's prospects for a win in November were bumping down a steep hill but just went off a cliff.
October 19, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
It would be interesting if Powell and general Tony McPeak would do an ad together.
Use some footage of Powell when he worked for Reagan. That would really piss off the republican base.
Now Powell has to endure the racist wrath of his own party. Not to worry there's a prime time speech now reserved for him at the 2012 democratic convention, Obamas reelection of course.
October 19, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
While it's true that Powell's behavior in the lead-up to the Iraq folly has forever besmirched him and certainly earned him my contempt, the real point is that his endorsment is a dandy stick with which to beat McSlime.
As far as I'm concerned, any stick that beats McScum/Failin' is a good stick.
October 19, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!
Nobody has been waiting for this as much as me. I am so excited I have to donate to Barack again and get out canvassing tommorow. YESSSSSSS!!!
October 19, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would just like to add that Colin Powell is a total coward.
He could have exposed Bush's and Cheney's lies about Iraq, but he didn't. He went along with them, because he was too cowardly to call them out or because he truly believed their shit (which I, personally, don't buy -- he had real problems with the info he was getting for his U.N. speech -- but he gave it anyway.)
Face it, Colin Powell sold his soul and nothing he can do now will redeem it.
He's going to hell for what he did to start the War on Iraq. The blood of too many people is on his hands.
Endorsing Obama won't save him.
October 19, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell is a total coward? You see what I mean? Then Dem's get pissy when Republicans call them unpatriotic.
October 19, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell being a coward is the OPPOSITE of being a patriot. Telling the truth about him is PATRIOTIC -- regardless -- and who gives a damn -- the delusional crap spewed by the far-right lunatic fringe America-haters.
October 19, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He could have exposed Bush's and Cheney's lies about Iraq, but he didn't." --- And who would have listened?
The trouble with that course of action is that it's a single-shot pistol. If it didn't change things altogether, if those in power managed to marginalize him (which they probably would have done), there was nothing else he could have done to actually impact things. He would simply have earned himself a place in the heroes of the left. By staying 'in the tent' he had a continuing chance to influence.
One can honestly argue, have a reasonable difference of opinion, about which course of action is more cowardly and which shows more 'intestinal fortitude' and genuine concern for our country. And for the people who disagree with the prevailing sentiments expressed her, Powell's endorsement is going to be extremely important.
October 19, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
KA-POWELL!!!!11
October 19, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm happy to see that Powell has endorsed Obama. Not only does Powell give a strong endorsement for Obama, but he also takes the McCain campaign to task.
This endoresment gives republicans permission to vote Obama. And just as important, it gets into McCain's head.
October 19, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama owes a debt of gratitude to Powell for more than just today's endorsement.
Powell paved the way for an African-American to become president.
I know there are others -- Andrew Young, for one -- who also laid down and widened the path to the presidency. But it was Powell who 8 years ago, as a Republican and a military commander and Sec. of State, desensitized many conservative Americans to the idea of a black main living in the White House.
October 19, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
And -- the one thing for which I have always given him credit -- George W. Bush played a role in this by making Powell (and later Rice) Secretary of State and a number of other high-level AA appointments. No, I don't think Bush did a thing of help for the larger black community, but on a personal level I do believe that the man has no racial prejudice. Simply being a conservative Republican president who was not racially prejudiced and his work on AIDS are the two things, that I can think of, for which Bush honestly deserves positive credit. (Actually, I guess his parents may get some credit for the former.)
October 19, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Penn State is 8-0, and Colin Powell has done the right thing. It's a good Sunday morning.
October 19, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fantastic, wonderful news. Based on Wilkerson's note to Steve Clemons, I didn't think Powell would actually endorse. This will dominate the news cycle for the next couple of days, but even better, it's a solid endorsement from a military figure who still has a lot of respect from independent and center/center-right voters. This is one big step closer to closing it out in Obama's favor.
October 19, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can the McCain campaign continue the palling with terrorists mantra when General Powell has endorsed Obama? The endorsement throws a wrench into the McCain message.
October 19, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have supported Obama for a long time and this endorsement may help him with some swing voters and some unhappy Republicans. I don't think, however, that it is an act of political courage on the part of Powell. Sadly, he has made several decisions this decade on self interest first and foremost. I think, here again, he sees the reality of the election and is positioning himself to his advantage.
October 19, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow...Powell stuck a hatchet in Palin. He called her " unqualified."
October 19, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Scalpel!
October 19, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I missed the beginning of the Powell interview, but where I tuned in, he very pointedly refuted many of McCain's tired attacks.
Powell's statements in support of his endorsement will resonate with many undecided voters. Yes, they're still out there -- I found one while canvassing yesterday.
If this endorsement helps pull in some stragglers without alienating others, it's a positive.
October 19, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another ray of sun breaking over the horizon in the dawning of a new day.
October 19, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen, brother.
October 19, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
If anyone is interested, enclosed is a link to a PBS documentary called Bush's War. You guys are pretty informed so you've probably seen it. It does a great of explaining the roles that Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Rice and others played in the run up to the war. I am a freshman in politics (became totally engrossed when Obama won Iowa) so I wasn't really paying attention when all this was happening. I respect Powell because he is the only one, as far as I know, that expressed regret in the role they played. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/
October 19, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
At the beginning of the Bushit criminal enterprise's "administration," Powell and Rice, standing together, said that Iraq was not a threat. They both knew, all along, that Iraq was not a threat.
And they both participated in planning and imposing -- with Rice as chair -- the war crime of torture.
That demolished the US's moral standing, and UNDERMINED national security. Powell hadn't the moral balls to instead resign; instead he not only went along with but assisted with that war crime.
Respect him, respect the crime.
October 19, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, did s/he NOT just type that they are a freshman in politics? Regardless of your personal feelings about Powell, that was just over-the-damned-top to write what you did.
How about providing a few links for his/her reference/research instead of putting the person on blast? You, too had a period when you were just learning the deeper knowledge/implications about people and who what they worked for or on behalf of. Geeze...
October 19, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell is worse than even Dick Cheney. At least, Cheney truly believed in our attack on Iraq.
Powell didn't believe that what we were doing was right, but still he went along with it.
Again, I have to say Colin Powell is a coward and a punk.
Sorry, folks. This is no hero endorsing Obama.
I happen to think that Obama could be our best President since JFK (and he certainly has good reasons for accepting the acclamations of Powell).
I just think that Powell is a raging liar and asshole.
October 19, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree with your assessment
October 19, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Regardless of what you think of Colin Powell -- and I share some of your feelings about -- a very prominent REPUBLICAN endorsing the DEMOCRATIC candidate in the most enthusiastic, well-reasoned way imaginable is a terrific boost and boon to Obama's campaign. And, within reason -- no David Duke or Lyndon LaRouche endorsements, please -- we should accept whatever help is offered to get Obama elected.
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell gave the best rationale for Obama’s candidacy. The endorsement was well thought out and reasonable. For some of us that think the image McCain is telegraphing doesn’t matter, please look at Al jaazera coverage in the last 2 weeks, it absolutely devastating. It was America at its worst.
Collin Powell cut through the chase when he said McCain’s tactics is killing our image in the Middle East. If you think that argument doesn’t make sense, look no further than YouTube, it is well documented. The fringes that yell at McCain’s rally, the epithet that came out of these people and the recent assertion from the congress woman from Minnesota are absolutely appalling.
I am glad Collin Powell stand up for what he believes in. I have heard enough of this scary tactics that tend to bring out the worse angel of our nature.
October 19, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I guess I'll hold my nose and try to be glad for anything that might help Obama.
October 19, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope it helps turn the undecided, and the voters who are shakily pro-Obama.
However, this man is the reason I decided to change my mind, and support the invasion of Iraq. I felt that if he said what he said to the UN, the US must have known there was an imminent threat from Saddam.
I will never forgive Colin Powell for betraying me with those lies.
October 19, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do you believe in redemption?
October 19, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's the real question, isn't it?
I think it's important to consider that Colin Powell expressed deep regret for his error in supporting the Iraq war -- and, also importantly, that he took personal responsibility for the consequences -- BEFORE the electoral tide began turning against the Republican party. This gives credence to the idea that he was speaking from the heart, not merely trying to salvage his own reputation.
You also have to consider that the rest of the Bush crowd -- from the guy at the top down to the anonymous drones in staff jobs and think tanks -- are still pushing the hard neocon line. The big neocon intellectuals may have abandoned Bush, but they've never been willing to admit that THEY, personally, were wrong. Powell is almost alone in this respect.
October 19, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I, like many others here, have a lot of issues with the way in which Powell conducted himself as a member of the Bush administration...in my eyes, he'll never be able to completely redeem himself.
Having said that, though, I was happy to hear him lay out the reasons behind his decision to endorse Obama. I was especially grateful to hear him say "So what if Obama was a Muslim?" and talk some about diversity in this country. I think that point has not been expressed enough during the "secret Muslim" discussions in the press.
October 19, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes--I thought that was especially significant and important and I'm happy that he said it out loud and forthrightly.
It was a great appearance, and he very solidly threw his support to Obama. I am pleased. His endorsement can be helpful with fence-sitters, and it will dominate the news cycle for a day or two. And when you only have 16 days left, that's significant.
October 19, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
With crowds of 1750,000 in Missouri yesterday, a haul shall we say of $150,000,000 for September, and Powell's endorsement( I suspect Team Obama is now making the t.v. ads with Powell's words), things are looking up.
October 19, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
175,000 I meant, not enough room for ten times but one can wonder!
October 19, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell dropped a couple of significant bombs during his endorsement --- first, that the Republican party has gone WAY too far to the right, and second, that a McCain/Palin administration would result in the appointment of very conservative right-wing Supreme Court justices.
October 19, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
the question is will McCain change his campaign tactics in light of the issues Colin Powell raised? Will the negativity end? will the insinuations about BO's religion end? will the questions about BO's patriotism end? will the character assassination end?
October 19, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
No way! It's all they have. Take away all the attack ads and what does McCain have to talk about, except his experiences in another ill advised and immoral war. He wasn't a hero in that one either, merely a survivor, imho.
October 19, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powell is a very flawed figure. His endorsement will probably help Obama but I'm not thrilled about it. The guy could have kept us out of an illegitimate war.
There is something else, though, and that is the growing numbers people who know McCain well who are going with Obama. Is it possible that they know enough about McCain's health -- mental as well as physical -- to believe they should do what they can to keep their old friend/colleague out of the White House?
October 19, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I note that in his subsequent comments, he blamed the intelligence for his speech to the UN. In fact, he said shortly after the UN speech that the information given him by the Bushit criminal enterprise had "nothing there"; so he, with his Chief of Staff Wilkerson, went to the CIA and went trhough all the intelligence and cobbled together a case that supported the policy.
He "fit the facts to the policy". He also admitted that the "case" he'd made was bogus.
Now he blames the intelligence; and then whines that Congress went along -- making no mntion of the fact that the same was done with Congress: only the intelligence which supported the pre-existing policy was provided to Congress.
Thanks for endorsing Obama. Otherwise, in total, you are a slug and a serially-lying swine. And worse, when I think of your covering up of the mass murder of the elderly, women, and children and infants at My Lai.
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Geez Jnagarya, we get it. You don't like Colin Powell.
October 19, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Powell's statement is SUPERB! It makes the case beautifully.
If you know anyone who's wavering, make sure they see this brilliant seven minutes.
October 19, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I would lay off the anti-Powell stuff.. I've worked for the man and he is a highly competant, thoughtful gentleman. Yes he was too good of a soldier in the iraq leadup, but how many of us have no sins to confess from the period 2001-2003?
October 19, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Powell is not without flaws but which of us would not aspire to giving exactly the kind of endorsement he has provided at exactly this time?
October 19, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's entirely possible to look beyond politics of the past as view this endorsement strictly from a strategic perspective.
For at least the next couple of days the story will be the Powell endorsement. That means everytime McCain or one of his surrogates is on tv, they will be asked about the endorsement. This cuts into the time of the McCain message, and like Powell, time is not on McCain's side.
October 19, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right. This is the time when it actually *counts* to play the game of dominating the 24-hour news cycle.
October 19, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've always thought of Colin Powell as the Albert Speer of the Bush regime.
Like Speer in the Third Reich, Powell lent credibility and a veneer of dignity to a thuggush regime. Like Speer, he could have chosen to take a more courageous stand, at a much earlier time, and done the world some good.
But also like Speer, Powell (as noted above by a poster called Anew08) stands virtually alone among high-ranking members of the Bush administration in acknowledging the gravity of his error, and in a taking a share of personal responsibility for the consequences.
History has found Speer to be a problematic character, difficult to render judgment upon. The judges at Nuremberg spared him the noose and sentenced him instead to 20 years imprisonment. In his post-Nazi life he created a new persona for himself, as the only prominent repentant Nazi, through a seemingly endless series of books and interviews and other public statements. Some people never forgave him. Others, including prominent Jewish leaders, felt his contrition was sincere and came to admire his newfound moral courage.
I wonder if Powell will now spend the rest of his life, like Speer, trying to atone for his sins in the service of George Bush.
October 19, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ever the loyal, dutiful Republican, The Potato immediately set himself to the task of undercutting Powell's endorsement by asking him a series of questions designed to raise doubts about Powell's credibility. Good job, Mr. Brokaw. The check, I'm sure, is in the mail.
October 19, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I detest that man. Truly detest Brokaw, oh well this will control the narrative for a few days, that is all we need.
October 19, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Today I seem to be disagreeing with everyone that I usually agree with, but I was very pleased with Browkaw's questions and suspect that Powell was also. Those things ARE going to be said and asked - no doubt about it. Let Powell address them himself, first person. It was a compliment to Powell that the hard questions were asked and it strengthened his endorsement that he could give the answers. Pre-innoculation, if you will.
October 19, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brade Blakeman (or whatever) emphasizes on behalf of McCain this is a "personal issue", in other words, Powell is doing it solely because he and Obama are both....
October 19, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still will never forgive Powell for his role in Iraq but I have to say, the way he made the endorsement was exceptional and hit all the right notes. His answers to questions were even better, especially when he talked about taxes.
October 19, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, in my reading, unfortunately Brokaw was trying to make it look like Powell's was a racial endorsement.
Andrea Mitchell looks good on some occasions, and this morning she did do good job on her interpretation of Powel's endorsement on how it would appeal to military retirees in Florida (Joe's point), the suburban folks, and women. Powell was good in covering all the bases: Obama's readiness, steadiness, intellectuality through McCain's erratic behavior, sleazy robocalls and Roe vs. Wade, and Palin's selection to retain Republican right wing extremism.
Once again, sadly Brokaw was as bad as Wallace, if not worse in his choice of questions.
October 19, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are Republicans trying to use the financial crisis as an "excuse" as to why they are losing? Pathetic, McCain handled that crisis horribly while O handled it exactly how you hope a President would. THAT'S the difference.
October 19, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is Brokaw EVER right in his line of questions? It is impossible for this man speak without demonstrating his Party affiliation and in this particular election his racism.
I have said repeatedly and I have sent e-mails to MTP (and the station) expressing the need for Brokaw to be removed from this assignment.October 19, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
This endorsement wins the news cycle for the weekend. Good Job David Axelrod! This is the way to drive the narrative. The tightening of McCains numbers (which was inevitable) required action. This is the perfect counter foil to the negative campaigning being done by the Rethugs.It's coming down to the wire and both campaigns bags are getting a little empty. The trick is to keep up the pressure and the ability to re-structure the media story away from your opponent. The McCain camp has been winning news cycles but Obama has been winning the war. At this late date I don't think there is much more the McCain camp can say to change anything. The level of negativity and Robo-calls will have an impact.We have to insure that the voters get to the polls. A tighter race and that will happen. I was getting worried about complacency amongst the Dems.Lets stay fired up!
October 19, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with your assessment. And let's not forget the 1/2 hour of air time for Obama Wed night. The lead-up to that and the follow-up should give them another big positive boost.
October 19, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know a lot of folks do not like Powell for his role in enabling the Iraq war, but this endorsement is very significant because Powell did not have to do it.
He could have stayed silent and just faded away as an old hero of the Republican party.
But obviously he feels strongly enough about the state of the world and the choice in this election that he was compelled to come out and take a stand. That is important.
True, we all wish he had taken that stand 6 years ago, but we should not diminish the importance of his position now because of that.
October 19, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Congratulations to Powell, the FIRST major public figure I am aware of (other than Juan Cole!) to condemn Republican attacks on Muslims.
October 19, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Campbell Brown, too.
October 19, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Olbermann has said this as well.
October 19, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Impeccably timed -- as usual! :o)
October 19, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
"generational change"
"steadiness of their actions"
"focus on trivial issues"
"constant shifting of the argument"
"taxes are always a redistribution of money...most of the money that is redistributed goes back to the people who paid them."
This endorsement devastates any argument that McCain can make to justify his candidacy.
btw, I love that he called out the wingnut from Minnesota.
October 19, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican spin on this will be:
"Well, it was expected."
If you know what I am saying. And I think you do.
October 19, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's clear from looking at the comment section of USA Today that the die-hard Republicans have basically two interpretations pre-wired into their self-justifications:
If Powell had endorsed McCain, then Powell would be heartily praised for his unbiased perspective.
Now that Powell has endorsed Obama, he's condemned for his racial bias.
October 19, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. Pro-mcShame = good American. Pro-Obama = antiAmerican. In the view of repubs.
October 19, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
On Fox News all they have is the headline - no story... typical
October 19, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
October 19, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said, and seconded.
October 19, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had to work this a.m. and just checked in for this wonderful news.
I've got my issues with Powell but, so what?
This is grand.
He is widely admired in the Republican base. That thrills me.
October 19, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw talking to Joe Scarborough, from the transcript: "McCain is beginning to run out of some options, but we've been there before with him."
Not even trying to appear impartial.
October 19, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post, kmac.
And here's some good news--on top of Obama's 6-point advantage in today's Rasmussen, he's increasing his lead in Gallup again. Just out:
O up by 10 among RVs (+2)
O up by 7 among LV (new model) (+3)
O by 3 among LV (traditional) (+1)
Momentum shifting again, this time in our favor! But Josh's latest post is certainly to be heeded.
October 19, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Colin Powell is a war criminal. So now, not only does Obama "pal around with terrorists" but he's been endorsed by a war criminal.
i fail to see how this helps him.
October 19, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. This guy is reviled by the anti-war groups. His endorsement amounts to a smear, in my opinion.
October 19, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anti-war groups already support Obama. Powell will sway Republicans and Independents. That's all that concerns me at the moment. Obama needs to take the office.
If any anti-war sorts drop their support of Obama because of Powell, that would be the cutting off of the nose to spite the face stuff.
October 19, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
i wrote that comment before i saw the interview. And i still feel an incredible sense of betrayal over his consent to the torture of prisoners, more so because he's an army general who actually commanded troops in combat and i felt he should have done more to protect our troops by fighting the torture policies instituted by our govt.
But...
Colin Powell reminded me why i liked him in the first place when he said this:
"Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer is no. That's not America. Is there something wrong with a seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing he or she could be president? Yet I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion that he is a Muslim and might have an association with terrorists. This is not the way we should be doing it in America."
October 19, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Powell has just released a statement directed at those Obama supporters who are smearing him in the blogosphere -
October 19, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
My Lai
This whitewash assured the success of Major Powell's career as an Army political insider. I'm glad for whatever benefit may accrue to Obama's campaign from this endorsement. But, it would not sway me.
Never forget.
Thanks.
mp
October 19, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, JN, we get that you don't like Powell. But, TonnyB is a regular poster here and is not a troll. We try to maintain a tone of respect for the opinion of others around here. How about joining us in that effort.
October 19, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto.
October 19, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Powell's endorsement is powerful and rational. I am deeply grateful for it.
October 19, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
And it is perfectly timed for Obama's rally in Fayetteville, NC.
October 19, 2008 1:59 PM