« TPM Track Composite: Presidential Race Could Be Tightening | Home | Bachmann Challenger Raises Big Bucks Since Her Hardball Appearance »

Big News Orgs Picking Up On Magnitude Of McCain's Robo-Slime Campaign

The New York Times, The Washington Post and CNN are now getting serious about picking up on the story of John McCain's robo-slime campaign, all weighing in with pieces that endeavor to demonstrate the true breadth and scope of McCain's under-the-radar smear effort.

The Times piece is here. WaPo's is here. And you can watch CNN's report on the video below.

The Times piece hits directly hits on two key points: First, the calls are "misleading," as the paper puts it, perhaps too delicately. And second, the calls show McCain yet again jettisoning a formerly claimed principle as he faces the increasingly likely prospect of defeat. As the paper notes, McCain high-mindedly denounced such tactics when he was the target of them in 2000, and again during the GOP primary this year, when he described the robo-slime being directed at him as "scurrilous stuff."

It's worth stepping back to ponder what's really going on here. While McCain and Sarah Palin try to persuade you that they're running a relatively clean campaign and don't question Obama's patriotism or love of country, they are running an enormous shadow campaign to smear Obama in the ugliest of ways, one that's designed to portray him as a friend of terrorists, as a vaguely sinister other, as not genuinely committed to defending our country, and as callously indifferent to the lives of newborn babies.

Thus, while Palin was sweetly claiming yesterday that she knows "Obama loves America," her and McCain's campaign were funding thousands upon thousands of calls telling battleground state voters that Obama put "Hollywood above America" during the crisis negotiations, that Obama and Dems merely "say" they want to keep you safe and "aren't who you think they are," and that Obama has "worked closely" with a "domestic terrorist" whose group "killed Americans."

There are two McCain campaigns operating simultaneously right now. There's the one that McCain and Palin are running in front of the cameras, and then there's the subterranean robo-slime campaign, which is bombarding thousands upon thousands of voters with multiple messages that McCain would never associate himself with in the glare of the klieg lights. That's the real story here.

Meanwhile, here's CNN's robo-slime report (with a much-appreciated plug for TPM)...



178 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Good to see you guys getting props for your work.

And nice to see the media actually doing some work.

user-pic

True!

user-pic

I suspect this deluge of ectoplasmic smears will be largely neutralized by Obama's half-hour blanket TV buy.  When people actually see and hear him, they see what a load of bullshit the Obama-as-other portrait really is.

Hmmm.  Don't remember when it's scheduled for.  Is it sometime next week?

user-pic

october 29, 8pm.

user-pic

Thanks.   I've put it in my calendar.

user-pic

Great job staying on top of this. Happy to see the MSM giving you folks your props!

I'm still amazed they think this can work. But I don't suppose anyone should be amazed by anything that the McCain campaign will do at this point.

user-pic

Wonder if they will do Palin Robocalls...

user-pic

I hope not. That voice!

Unless Tina does it. THAT I'll listen to.

user-pic

Good - now will someone who gets to interview McCain in the next week please ask him directly:

Senator, in 2000 the Bush campaign smeared your family with despicable lies. You were outraged and disgusted by the slime, as were many others. But you then went and hired the very same people who smeared your family to work for your campaign. Senator, what kind of man would do that? You hired the same people who smeared your children. What does that say about YOUR character?

user-pic

Take your pick-

"For 5 1/2 years I didn't have access to either a robo or a call"

"If Obama had agreed to 5,398 Town Halls..."

"My friend, Joe the Plumber, likes robo calls because they are democratic-everyone gets one!"

user-pic

Ha!

user-pic

You forgot, "Let me get back to you."

user-pic

Nice. How could I forget the 'Cuda? (not Hemi's...)

user-pic

So good to see this moving up into the MSM. Disgusting to receive these things. And they seem to cling to the voicemail. Unless you listen to the whole thing, you literally can't get the voicemail to stop blinking. Just like mcShame, the blinking is annoying!

Thank you MSM for noticing the plight of the masses!

user-pic

The ad is terribly misleading, in that it equates Obama's "work" with Ayers with its statements about Ayers' "domestic terrorism" of 40 years ago.

Very significant in the Post article is the statement that the GOP intends to deploy "hundreds" of different Robocalls in the next two weeks. This, of course, suggests a Rovian microtargeting strategy.

Nevertheless, it also suggests the degree of desperation, which is clearly reaching scorched earth levels. I think there is only so much they can move the base, and even those who are on the tipping point, with such techniques.

And, if you've heard them, the style is crass, simplistic, and in many ways offensive in their method of influence even for many Repubs.

Though often, for some, there's no such thing as too crass and obvious.


user-pic

That's so true. It's hard to believe that anyone would fall for this lowball kind of approach--especially when there is so much information about negative campaigning.

I guess Barnum was right about underestimating smarts in some people around you some times!

user-pic

I know. I don't think it's always intellect, but fear, which tends to freeze the intellect at times...

user-pic

Don't feed trolls, folks. Let them work for a living... without any help from us.

user-pic

I agree. Don't feed the trolls.

user-pic

Especially TheraP. God...

user-pic

I, for one, adore TheraP.

user-pic

And look at you...you poor starving child...:>

user-pic

Ahh, I was just saying something nice about someone whose posts I have followed for some time. You are obviously looking for new fights.

Good luck with that.

user-pic

No, I'm very happy. What do you mean? Was it the smile that seemed so martial?

user-pic

And look at you...you poor starving child...:>

user-pic

TheraP is awesome!! One of our best contributors and thinkers....who the hell are you?

user-pic

I also have found it remarkable that McCain could turn to the woman (in Ohio?) and describe Obama as a "decent man, a family man" with what appeared to be sincerity, while deploying these techniques out of view.

Many have said that once McCain lost the opportunity in 2004, he became far more willing to use any technique to win (e.g. The RS article by Tim Dickinson, I believe). This really is apparent in the Robocall portion of the campaign--after he gave the appearance of turning away from such techniques.

If anything, this indicates the willingness to employ an underground strategy along with the overt strategy that we have seen for the past eight years.

Another clear operational, strategic, and ethical similarity with the past Administration.

user-pic

You really find that remarkable? They are so caught up the idea that smears work, that they still haven't caught on that people have this little thing called "the internet" and there you can find vids of people saying things from before last Thursday.

Really, McCain has been lying through his teeth about running an honest campaign from the beginning. The saving grace here is that he didn't do an about face at the 2nd debate, and come out like the honorable man with integrity many of us thought he was until fairly recently. If he had taken that moment to shut down the smears and rise above it with some talk of "enlightened discourse", "exchange of ideas", etc., than we might have been in trouble. But since they have no enlightened discourse or ideas to share, that wasn't gonna happen.

Basically, McCain was never the man we once thought he was. The Rolling Stone article is a pretty good summation of that.www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain -

user-pic

Link got cut off. You all have seen the article though, I know.

user-pic

I know. I've seen the change in McCain from 2000. There's been that willingness to go for the throat that is a definate change from before.

Also, he seems to be less sharp, which might make him less willing to resist the GOP machine.

user-pic

I agree on the last part. There's a slowness--I remember seeing it even at the beginning of the campaign.

It might make it hard for him to resist--or more obstinate. It's hard to say. Either way--we see the results in the above--Robocalls, etc.

user-pic

Senator Susan Collins in Maine asked McCain to stop the robo-calls (she's in a really tough race), but so far there hasn't been any agreement to do so from the McCain campaign. Has anyone heard otherwise?

user-pic

I have not received calls today, but was getting about 2 per day for the past few days this week. That's in WI.

user-pic

As of 5 hours ago, Politico says they have not stopped.

user-pic

Please don't feed TheraP

user-pic

Methinks we got under your skin a bit, Bob.

Glad to see you haven't dumped ACT III, Scene 74 of your opus on us, yet.

user-pic

:) (trollish as I've been called..._

user-pic

Love that post :>

user-pic

I haven't had this much fun all week :>

user-pic

Jesus, what a douche.

user-pic

Dorn, that is. Is he always that tiresome?

user-pic

Yahoo to TPM!! Now is the time for McCain to go back on the View because those ladies are the only ones that will ask him those tough "journalistic" like questions. I would like to see Palin visit the View just woman to woman like ya know!

user-pic

They would tear her apart...

user-pic

Just alone I think that Joy Behar would drive her back to Wasilla.

user-pic

Now that could be a pay-per-view event: Sarah Palin on the View. Just think of the possibilities...

user-pic

Nightline did a short piece on the McCanker robocalls last night. They even showed footage of him denouncing that style of campaigning during the 2000 election. Good stuff.

user-pic

Shadow campaigns have been waged for decades by the GOP evangelical base. The ways have changed with new technology. Unfortunately for them, it's that marvelous technology that is now exposing their filthy tactics. And media that is finally willing to raise the exposure to the masses.

Between this and the stories on voter suppression, registration purges and voting machines that are misregistering votes already, Americans are beginning to see what brought us to our great misadventure with the GOP in charge of the country.

These days, I keep thinking of all those comments about 'a permanent minority party'. I get an image of a pygmy elephant.

user-pic

Exactly. Hofstadter wrote about 'em back in the '60s. If anything, the Robocall is ancient technology--not that I'd want them to find a better way...

user-pic

Or a blind one!

user-pic

Are you kidding? Having a ball.

It's hard for you to understand--this is a gift, unexpected and wonderful.

user-pic

BTW, there's a good post from the Atlantic on the effectiveness of Robocalling--a Yale study, cited by Ambinder (who leans right, so take with a grain of salt):

Political scientists and consultants say that taped-voice telephone calls are among the least effective methods of voter persuasion.

Privately, Republican consultants liken that the RNC's massive robocall effort this week to a ball and string toy -- it gives vendors something to do and activists something to think about.

Alan Gerber and Donald Green, Yale profs who study turnout, have written that robocalls "might help you to stretch your resources in ways that allow you to contact the maximum number of people, but don't expect to move them very much, if at all."

Generic robocalls -- those not targeted at specific constituencies -- are worse.

There's an exception. When the calls reinforce a message that a candidate is carrying, then they're not always a bad investment.

But the national McCain campaign is only weakly invested in anti-Obama message on William Ayers and Obama's "terrorist" connections.

If the study is accurate--if--it's hard to see the message that McCain is "carrying" that is being effectively reinforced here--altho' that may not be true for the hundreds of others cited in the Post article.

user-pic

Thanks to Greg for staying on the case & forcing (or encouraging) the MSM to call out the McCain-GOP shadow campaign. I was the recipient of a new version of smear campaign & I wonder if it's one that's directed at Obama supporters. Instead of directly accusing Obama of anything, the e-mail "asks questions" about his background that in total suggest he is a "sleeper," funded all his life by some nefarious ferriners. It's a smear that's not a smear.

Greg's article is featured on RealityChex.com at http://www.realitychex.com along with other stories about the robocalling & now, unfortunately, a section dedicated to voter suppression stories.

user-pic

Robocalls and their equivalents are illegal in some states. You might check your state, and if they are, report them to the appropriate authorities. Pushback of that kind is essentially free, and a legal harrassing of the illegal harassers.

user-pic

Getting them here in Indiana. Pissing people off. Dems had a press conference and brought some Repubs for Obama who upset with the calls. Same day Sarah visited this red state turning blue.

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081018/NEWS0502/810180435

user-pic

Are they the same as the message cited in the Times/Post article above? WaPo says they are sending out new ones.

user-pic

I've heard they are Robo Calls...

user-pic

I read the article. It sounds as if the people north of the border (I am in KY) are not falling for it and are angry. That makes me feel good

user-pic

Any bets on whether McCain follows through on his promise to have Palin appear on the Letterman show before the election?

user-pic

Depends on how well she does on SNL tonite I think...

user-pic

I'm betting that it will be all softballs and one token hardball, so she will likely get a little lift. But Tina can't let it go ENTIRELY...

user-pic

If you think that is bad, look what they are sendig to us republicans. I am so disgusted. I went around in 2000 getting McCain on the Ballot in my state but when he hired the Rovian Wrecking Crew to run his 2008 campaign I said enough. Then to appeal to us "women" (Air quotes) he chose Palin....urgh I get these every other day and it makes me furious!! I also got a letter in the mail from Palin, begging for money. As if...

Dear ,

We're now less than three weeks away from the most important election in a generation.

Three weeks to help John McCain, Sarah Palin, and our Republican candidates running for office across the country get their principled, conservative message past the liberal mainstream media filter and directly to the American people.

Three weeks to show that responsible Republican policies of cutting taxes and reining in out-of-control pork-barrel spending are what our economy needs to spur growth and create jobs, not huge Obama-Biden Democrat tax hikes, protectionism, and wasteful expenditures.

Just three weeks to communicate the facts about our opponents that the liberal media won't: Barack Obama's troubling past and close ties to leftist radicals like Bill Ayers and convicted criminals like Tony Rezko.

Time is running short, and we have a lot of work to do. It is up to our Party to show America that John McCain and Republican candidates have the right policies -- and the right kind of character -- to lead our country in these troubled times.

We need your help, .

To have the resources necessary to run thousands of hours of television ads and fund the all-important get-out-the-vote push in battleground states across America, RNC Victory 2008 must raise $50 million in the next three weeks.

That's why I'm asking you to make a secure online campaign contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $100, $50, or $35 to RNC Victory 2008 today. Your gift could be the difference in reaching enough voters with the truth about our opponents' lack of sensible economic policies and appropriate character to govern.

Remember, the elections of 2000 and 2004 were decided by very small margins, and this year's election will be no different. And this time, liberal special interests are spending over $1 billion to make sure their Democrat allies emerge victorious.

Help defeat the Obama-Biden Democrats and their leftist allies -- and prevent a complete left-wing takeover of American government.

Please make a secure online contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $100, $50, or $35 today to help RNC Victory 2008 counter the Obama-Biden campaign's misleading rhetoric and elect Republicans up and down the ticket in November.

Best Wishes,

Robert M. "Mike" Duncan
Chairman, Republican National Committee

P.S. we need your help to expose the Obama-Biden Democrats' disastrous, radical plans for America. We only have three weeks left until Election Day -- help us make sure we can get the word out about what our nation faces by making a secure online campaign contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $100, $50, or $35 to RNC Victory 2008 today.

Dear,

From Ohio and Florida to Wisconsin and Nevada, there are reports of fraudulent voter registration forms being submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a liberal group that is dedicating its resources to electing the Obama-Biden Democrats.

Now, the FBI is investigating whether ACORN helped foster voter registration fraud around the nation. They already are being investigated in 13 states for their fraudulent actions.

Barack Obama has a long history of working with ACORN. The Obama-Biden campaign has funneled more than $800,000 to ACORN and its friends for work on get-out-the-vote activities.

Theresa , we must fight back against attempts by Democrats at vote fraud and ensure the integrity of our democracy. Please join our effort to keep our elections clean and fair by making a secure online contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $250, $100, $50, or $35 to RNC Victory 2008 today.

The Democrats have proven they will do and say whatever it takes to win this election. This isn't the first time they've tried to inflate voter rolls with false names and take money from questionable sources -- and it won't be the last.

But this time we are ready for the liberals' deceitful tactics. We will not stand for the stealing of elections -- the tainting of our democracy -- by those who wish to subvert the rule of law.

Your secure online contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $250, $100, $50, or $35 to RNC Victory 2008 will support Republicans committed to building a safer, more prosperous America and help hold the Democrats and their left-wing allies accountable for their actions.

, voting is one of our nation's most sacred rights. Do your part to protect the integrity of our elections -- support RNC Victory 2008 today. Thank you.

Best Wishes,

Robert M. "Mike" Duncan
Chairman, Republican National Committee

P.S. , the outcome of the 2008 election is too important to the future of our country to be conducted unfairly. Please help us fight back against vote fraud and elect Republicans committed to the rule of law by making a secure online contribution of $2,000, $1,000, $500, $250, $100, $50, or $35 to RNC Victory 2008 today. Thank you


Dear Supporter,

On Wednesday, you saw John McCain win the final debate of the general election. On every issue, he proved he is ready to lead and ready to take this country in a new direction.

We know that John McCain is prepared to bring bold solutions to solve our nation's challenges. He'll fight for the "Joe the Plumbers," "Joe the Florists" and "Joe the Carpenters" of America to reduce taxes and allow more men and women to realize the American Dream. John McCain is the only candidate who has consistently put our country's needs above his own. Now, it's up to us now to make sure he wins on Election Day.

There's been a lot of talk in the media about the massive field operation Senator Obama has built with unlimited campaign funds. Our campaign is ready to match his operation, but we need you on board to do it.

As we enter the final weeks of the campaign, we're launching our major volunteer effort to elect John McCain and Sarah Palin. As a volunteer in your home state, you will be making a big difference in bringing the McCain-Palin ticket closer to victory.

Please follow this link to sign up for a volunteer shift. No matter what your schedule is, we have available shifts for each day leading up to November 4th. As a volunteer for our campaign, you will be provided with training, so no prior experience is needed.

There is a lot at stake in this election. As a volunteer for McCain-Palin, you can make a big impact in closing the gap in the polls and electing John McCain and Sarah Palin as our next president and vice president. Please follow this link to get involved today. Thanks for your support.

Sincerely,
Christian Ferry
Deputy Campaign Manager, McCain-Palin 2008

P.S. In addition to volunteering for our campaign, I'm asking you to visit the new website, www.RhetoricVsRecord.com. This site outlines the big differences between what Senator Obama says and what he does. Please take a few minutes to read through the site and pass it along to a few of your friends. Thank you.


This is in the last three days!!! Can you smell the fear and desperation?

This White, Catholic, Stay at home Mom, Republican, anti-abortion, reared in rural Western Pennsylvania is voting for the only smart choice. Obama-Biden.

user-pic

Took them long enough to come up with an equivalent to "Fight the Smears". Losing the organizational game too...

user-pic

Damn that's alot of postage for alot of wasted words!

user-pic

Stick with your friends. Ignore the trolls.

user-pic

I hear ya, just tryin to engage those who will.

user-pic

What is all of this crazy stuff about the "trolls"? Is it about McCain? Weird...

user-pic

Ignore it. Just usual bumps of internet dysfunction. It's not even important to think about. Just enjoy yourself here.

user-pic

Oh, *I* understand!

He thinks he's the Hall Monitor!

There's one on every site...

user-pic

Right. Ever see the scene in "Life of Brian"?

It's always the same--The most sanctimonious in their liberalism are the ones who really just want to find small (ahem) power where they've failed to find big. "Liberals" who are the first to draw lines to conserve little positions--fast. You see it in every Government.

Pay it no mind. Speak your mind.

user-pic

I will!

user-pic

I didn't save the letter I got (don't know why McCain sent me anything anyway) I just filled up the postage-paid envelope with the heaviest stuff I could find around the house and mailed it back to them!

user-pic

Now, the FBI is investigating whether ACORN helped foster voter registration fraud around the nation. They already are being investigated in 13 states for their fraudulent actions.
_____

The first sentence has "whether ACORN helped foster . . . fraud". Second sentence leaves out the "whether".

Second sentence is also incoherent: ACORN is being "investigated . . . for their" fraud.

If it's concluded that ACORN is committing fraud, then there's no need to "investigate" "whether" they are doing so.

Other than that, the tone is arrogant and desperate. And the writing is typical of Republicans: atrocious, and the enemy of insomnia.

user-pic

Garrison Keillor's take on this campaign...

The campaign against him [Obama] is not one that anybody will point to with pride in years to come.  It is a long trail of honking and flapping and traces of green slime, as if a flock of geese had taken up residence in the front yard.
user-pic

Nice ending

Onward, America. We've all seen plenty of the worst -- the sly cruelty, the arrogant ignorance, the fascination with trivia, the cheats, the weaselish and piggish and the buzzardly -- but we can rise above it if we will only recognize a leader when one comes along and have the sense to let him lead.
user-pic

Thanks for the Keillor link jzap. I particularly like the phrase arrogant ignorance -- pretty well sums things up on the Republican side.

user-pic

It's been one of my favorites for a long time.

I've used plenty of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) tools that boast of a bit of Artificial Intelligence (AI).  The problem comes when it decides it knows more about the subject than I do and just won't let me design the damn thing the way I want to.  In those cases, the tool is worse than pencil and paper.

That's when an alternative decoding of the acronym AI seems entirely justified.

user-pic

So true.

user-pic

Great. Looks like the troll has recruited a confederate. And they're going to do a twosome. B

Beware the trolls. Leave them to each other.

user-pic

Beautiful night. Obama leads, the words are getting out without the ad hominem wasting of bandwidth, paranoid fantasies are gripping Repubs (and even PostS)--just a beautiful night.

user-pic

Great job, yet again, Greg.

The MSM can't avoid this any longer. It's too juicy, and dare I say, newsworthy.

Yikes. CNN doing news. What's next, Hewson responding to posts?

The times, they are a-changin'.

user-pic

It's such a waste of bandwidth--TPM has really changed--so much ad hominem. Stay focused on the issues, and ignore the trolls.

user-pic

Bob, I responded with substance above, and here just poked some fun at you.

Don't be so sensitive. You've trashed me up and down today, and I'm responding like we're old buddies. That's what we do here, we banter, argue, swear, whatever, and it's all good. But we don't spam threads, and that's why I originally had an issue with you. You seem to have stopped that, so, bravo.

user-pic

LOL.

Dom, one man's spam is another man's "fuckface".

I welcome your freedom to say it, and have a ball. But noone named you to the Thought Police, Dom--and if they did, thought is in a bear market. And if there were options on Spam--I'd take out a shitload on yours. So, as they say--pot meet kettle.

Now settle down and join the fun.

user-pic

And here's a little bedtime reading for your enjoyment (now don't keep your hands too busy while you're reading. Enjoy it fully :>


From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/paranoid-style-meets-issue-of-race-in.html

Sunday, October 12, 2008
The Paranoid Style Meets The Issue of Race In American Politics

Richard Hofstadter's seminal article "The Paranoid Style In American Politics" portrayed, for the first time with widespread impact, the insular and delusional suspiciousness that characterizes much of the "critique", if it can be called that, of the far right and, at times, of the extreme left.

Standing just one notch away from pure delusion--and often not even hewing that distance--and embracing those whose functionality--such as it may be--is supported by and compels the repetition of these fantasies, we see this style in every electoral cycle, manifesting itself, remarkably anew, in new minds, with the same characteristic conspiratorial thinking--the grasping of an ambiguous, or equally likely, unresearched but conspiratorial-sounding detail or name--into a grand plan, foggy in specifics but surely--as it has assumed its premise--secretly lurching towards an all powerful hegemony.

As always, they give people too much credit. As always, they are among the bitter powerless, whose manifest lack of explanation for that lack of power turns itself into a bitter projection--if they can't have it, their secret masters must, and so on. It gives them a path to power through projection--they see the secret truth, and gain power through it's proclamation--thus "None Dare Call It Conspiracy", thus the "Clinton Chronicles", thus "9/11 Truth", etc. etc.

Each election cycle, the impulse forces itself to burgeon anew, straining to fit facts to its preexisting need, straining to grow into the dark.

Now--it becomes interesting.

Here--we have a candidate whose power combines with the fact that he is the first of a long oppressed minority to rise to this position. How, we might ask, will this impulse find a way to strain itself upwards towards conspiratorial theories of all embracing power? A challenge to the force of the delusional impulse.

In the last few weeks, we have been seeing the development of this narrative.

Touch him with the brush of radicalism--despite the fact that Obama's adult life story has been one of consensus-building and unifying--a clear and deliberate move towards the shared need, and away from the radical fringe. The key has been to forge the conspiratorial, paranoid impulse with racial fears, to create the combined message: You don't know who he really is.

As in: "Who really is Barack Obama?"

This lights the torch to the paranoid style in full force, turning it upon ill-formed objects--Bill Ayers, ACORN, that by their mere sound and invocation, can be whipped by this eternal historical force into a storm of hatred. To those prone to such thinking, these become absolute evidence, touchstones, the words they have been waiting for.

For the conspiratorialist, the obvious and central characteristic of Obama's personality--the move to unify, which is inherent in his speech, actions and development, is--as is so often the case in this style--evidence of its opposite. Of course, if he were in fact a radically divisive figure, this would also serve as evidence of the same "radical" characteristic. That's the paranoid style--either it's there, or it's masterfully hidden: Heads I win, tails you lose (at least until medicated).

You likely have seen this kind of thinking developing on the outer edges of the message boards and twittering over recent months.

However, it was only with the cementing of the McCain-Palin team that the style has begun to grow into its fuller portrayal. Each of the two essential elements of the admixture is used to reinforce the other--"Radicalism"--Bill Ayers, ACORN--provides license, justification and cover to those who experience a deeper prejudice, and that very prejudice leads those who experience it to draw in unexamined, tangential "evidence" to prove to themselves or others his inauthenticity or "radicalism."

McCain, and to a greater extent Palin, have used this admixture at rallies to attempt to create some form of enthusiasm in the electorate. It has proven to be a volatile mixture, this new alloy of the paranoid style, and, in their efforts to provide some spark to a moribund campaign, they have been unable to keep this lightning in the bottle.

The remarkable and horrifying shouts we have heard over the past weeks did not originate with this campaign--but they were liberated by it, allowing this raw and stark version of the paranoid style to be unleashed by and feed off of these insinuations. We have seen this kind of visceral unleashing of the paranoid style, driven by fear and the impulsive, momentary, compensatory power of stereotypic hatred before, in other nations. Not here, and not in this way.

There are limits to winning--and losing--ugly. And there are ways to fan and contain the paranoid style. I suspect that Plain believes that she is speaking the plain truth to these audiences--and that there is a plain truth to be spoken, and that she already knows what it is--and no more.

It is John McCain's responsibility to put this darker manifestation of a dangerous and unnecessary dybbuk back in the bottle. I can see he understands what has been released--and perhaps would wish to retain just those parts that could meet his ambitions, without its consequent furies.

Just as you would rather lose an election than lose a war, John--I believe that you would rather lose an election than to unleash, justify, imprint and allow this distorted vision on this society. It was not you, it is not you, and it should not be you or us. Consider it your newest, and your best, call to courage.

Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/paranoid-style-meets-issue-of-race-in.html

Have a great night!

user-pic

Thank you *so much* for that brilliant idea.

I especially liked this:

"There are limits to winning--and losing--ugly. And there are ways to fan and contain the paranoid style. I suspect that Plain believes that she is speaking the plain truth to these audiences--and that there is a plain truth to be spoken, and that she already knows what it is--and no more.

It is John McCain's responsibility to put this darker manifestation of a dangerous and unnecessary dybbuk back in the bottle. I can see he understands what has been released--and perhaps would wish to retain just those parts that could meet his ambitions, without its consequent furies."

Did you really mean "Plain" instead of Palin?

LOL--Loved it!

user-pic

Congrats on getting a bit of MSM props.

user-pic

This is from Taegan Goddard--on the Robocall study.
Very encouraging--bottom line: Robocalls and Direct Mail generally ineffective, direct canvassing effective:

The revised edition of Get Out The Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout by Yale political science professors Donald Green and Alan Gerber concludes that using direct mail and robocalls for GOTV purposes are generally ineffective.

"Direct mail is expensive, and its capacity to mobilize voters is typically rather limited." As for robocalls, the authors say they "might help you to stretch your resources in ways that allow you to contact the maximum number of people, but don't expect to move them very much, if at all."

What works? Door-to-door canvassing is by far the most effective form of getting voters to the polls. There is also some evidence that newspaper ads might be effective.

If you work on campaigns, this book is a must-read.

user-pic

Yeah, I wonder if it isn't just a way of stretching their funds at this point. If they are so ineffective, I'm not surprised that McCain loves them!

user-pic

One can hope. I suspect they're in the "throw it all at the wall and see what sticks" phase, and that would be his way.

user-pic

Please don't respond. Just gets the trolls all wound up :>

user-pic

BTW, in addition to the two-track campaign described here and elsewhere, there's also the little issue of state law--the Robocalls may be in violation of State Law

From the HuffPo:

Several readers in Minnesota also reported receiving the call, which could be a violation of that state's laws. Explains Shaun Dakin, CEO & Founder of the National Political Do Not Contact Registry:

"Most robocalls are supposed to have two things, "paid for by X" and a phone number of the group making the call. Most do that. Now, that being said, there are some states that have their own robocall laws and they are much stricter. Minnesota pretty much bans robocalls entirely unless they are introduced by a human voice. And that pretty much never happens because it defeats the point."

If you receive these calls and they lack the above baseline requirements, worth at the very least contacting the NPDNC.

user-pic

Yeah but even if they are they won't get slapped on the wrist until after the election, if ever.

user-pic

If you've got Firefox, you can enter whatever you want to skip (using edit and "find"). Then click highlight and voila... you can just skip every single annoying post!

user-pic

Using it now--thanks!

user-pic

And this is how solidify Democratic self-identification in future voters. I tend to be fiscally conservative but I will never ever pull the lever for a GOP candidate at any level. They are the party of hate, division, and bigotry.

If the McCain campaign is resorting to these types of slimey tactics, then they've lost this campaign. What they don't realize is that they are also ruining their brand in the long-term.

user-pic

It's slash and burn. I believe the thinking may be, at least it will clear the ground for the future.

user-pic

This just in:

CNN: Sen. McCain, how do you explain the use of robo-slime calls by your campaign in light of your earlier statement when that this is "scurrilous stuff"?

McCain: When I was a prisoner of war we couldn't even receive robo calls

user-pic

Very funny!

user-pic

Hm....let's see.

Next, the BBC weighs in, with a reasonably good if off-kilter observation from their normally highly astute org:


There is something slightly sinister about John McCain's latest method of campaigning. It is well worth listening to the "robo-calls" here.

The messages are nothing like as aggressive as some we have heard in the past (and were used against Mr McCain himself by George W Bush in 2000) but telephone campaigning is a bit like email flirting (I am told!) - there is a sense of being able to get away with more than you would in face to face contact...

The analogy, if understating the reality, similar to the Times use of "misleading", does speak to exactly the dual-track campaigning discussed above, as well as a bit of motive--a good touch.

user-pic

This is a bipolar campaign. Say one thing - do another. It's a disgrace. And yet, so many of the people I work with are buying it. Of course, they don't dig enough to learn. They listen to the dog whistles, and then

sit, Boo Boo, sit

user-pic

Interesting use of the word "bipolar campaign" given McCain's mood swings...

user-pic

The inestimable Rachel Maddow was all over last night, too.

user-pic

Wish I had seen that.

user-pic

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ link for Rachel's Show

user-pic

It seems to me that McCain's problem is that there is absolutely no plausible deniability to his smearing of Barack Obama. When Kerry was smeared by the Swiftvets and when McCain himself was smeared in 2000, the Bush campaign could at least pretend that it was the work of others - remember charting the connections between BC'04 and the Swiftvet funding?

I really don't see how this particular Republican manages to govern this nation with the slime-covered hands that everyone can plainly see.

user-pic

Agreed. The swiftboat attacks had the power to the extent that it had because it was other vets attacking Kerry. Had Bush just stood up there at the podiums and made the accusation if would have been received in much the same way as Ayres is with McCain.

user-pic

OT, Sarah Palin suffers a defeat as Beluga Whales are placed on the endangered species list.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/18/us/18beluga.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

user-pic

Wasn't it Polar Bears she was seeking to keep off of the list as well? Come to think of it, I think so. That's 2.

user-pic

Acamus, you mentioned you are in IN - What's with Dick Lugar - Why hasn't he spoken out against the robocalls, Palin, and the slime of the repug campaign? Am I too naive? Is he sick?

user-pic

It is still very hard to believe that there will be a significant change in the political and social climate. And it'll take a good accounting of what was done in every area of the Federal government for the last eight years to get off on the right foot. Every Federal agency has been corrupted, and Defense and the military most of all. If there was, as there damn well should be, a thoroughgoing purge of those who perpetrated illegal or corrupt activity during the Bush years, it might be well over a year before the government is restaffed. Obama can't have that many people waiting. And once the accounting gets going, watch them squeal and run.

user-pic

What's also quite remarkable is the lack of humility, in someone who claims the characteristic as a guiding moral principle.

Of course, suspicion, isolation, dividing communities into the "for us or against us", using crude labels having nothing to do with the reality of human thought or content--these have nothing to do with humility.

They're defensive.

Pathological.

About McCain and Palin, I mean.

user-pic

I got a robo phony push-poll McCain call here in Oregon this afternoon. I don't know how other people react but it just pissed me off. If my own side were doing it, it would piss me off too. I think these things have to backfire.

user-pic

Was it a push poll or a robocall? Push poll is neg questions designed to make you think neg things, robocall is just neg info--didn't know they were doing push polls...

user-pic

Ugh! CNN calls the robocall about killing babies a challenge to Obama's position on abortion... jeezus'!!!
TPM has been on the record quite a bit recently! Kudos the the TPM team!

user-pic

Stop the HATETRIOTS!

Patrick Henry = Patriot

Sarah Palin = Hateriot

user-pic

Good coinage.

user-pic

McCain:

Irateriot.

user-pic

LOL!

Very funny...

user-pic

Wait a minute. I'm reading a bunch of stuff, and right now the Greg Palast Rolling Stone article.
Do I have this right, or am I crazy? Thousands of people, in many states, most of them in urban or low-income precincts, are going to go to the polls, and be told they can't vote and be offered, at best, a provisional ballot? Is that right? Is that why the GOP is busy hiring husky "poll watchers" (or political thugs?) And won't voting, and a chance to vote for Obama, be very, very important to a lot of people? (It is to me, but I can vote mail-in, and my reg is good, checked) Is this how the GOP "anti-vote-fraud" regs or laws they have established in many states going to work on Election Day? That is very scary. Seems to me it will create an explosive situation.

user-pic

Where's the link

user-pic

The good news, Mooser, is that the Supreme Court ruled that the kind of contesting they were intending to do in Ohio is out of bounds.

But yes, it's an awful thing to contest votes and make a person use a provisional ballot instead.

I hope when Obama takes over that we'll see real voting reform in this country.

user-pic
... the Supreme Court ruled that the kind of contesting they were intending to do in Ohio is out of bounds.

Unclear.

I've heard that SCrOTUS ruled not so much on the merits of the case, but that the plaintiff (the Ohio GOP, a private party) lacks the standing necessary to bring the lawsuit.

user-pic

Thanks for that

user-pic

That is true in Ohio, but many states have caged and purged their voting lists, enebled by the "anti-fraud" regs or laws, and so people are going to come down to vote for Obama and be told "no"? That can't be good.

user-pic

Same day registration should be the case in every state. That would solve it!

user-pic

Now, if the ballots are taken, and the votes later disqualified during counting, that's bad too, of course, but it does not have the same implications as stopping people at the polls.

user-pic

Vote early if your state allows it. That should help too.

user-pic

Reasonable idea.

user-pic
user-pic

I had thought that McCain would reel things in a bit during the final stretch of his campaign.

It appears he is determined to not only lose his own race, but be the deciding factor in losing 10 republican senate seats, and about 25 in congress.

If McCain thought his own party didn't like him in 2000 after this is over he will be a political leper. It's already being written.

user-pic

JM said at the beginning of McCain's campaign that he would lose, if he lost, everything. He seems determined to make this prediction true.
The article about the GOP goons ("pollwatchers") was in TPM. I wonder if they are going to involved in incidents this time around.

user-pic

BTW - You can report the robocalls on the Obama website - "Fight the Smears":

www.fightthesmears.com/report

user-pic

Thank you for that--better than the NDNCC

user-pic

Looking for the discussion of the military ballots...

user-pic

With McSame's history and what happened with Gore I also can't believe that this has not gotten media attention. Thanks for this. Maybe TPM can do something with it.

user-pic

Can anybody really express how good it will be to see the backs of those GOP monsters as they leave Washington, and State capitals, too? Nope, they can't, as a matter of fact. I think I have detected a definite trend; people have a hard time conceiving of an American government, more specifically an Executive, which does try to govern within the law, and for the benefit of the country. People suggest all the time that Obama may do things which could only be accomplished through the same malfeasance and mendacity as Bush commonly used. Of course, they posit that Obama would choose different victims, but the idea that the type of things Bush/Cheney did would be completely out of the question for any administration which tried to operate within legal guidelines never seems to register. They seem to think the US government can't operate legally. It's disheartening.

user-pic

Um, TPM, maybe you could see about reminding these guys (the media) that they haven't mentioned a NUMBER of unseemly things about the McCain camp lately, and WHY THE HELL IS THAT?

"UnAmericanism" = Palin's secessionist group tied to militias and racists in Alaska??

= Palin's witchhunting pastor?

= Palin's "end of days" prophetic church?

= McCain's association with Haggee?

= McCain's association with Liddy?

= McCain's Keating Five days?

In the last day or two, I've heard Matthews et al talk to the right and not mention ANY of the above. WHY IS THAT?

user-pic

Right on! It's time to lay the whole spectacle of compromised associations right out before the public. Why are McCain and Palin allowed to get away with so much? I just don't get it.

user-pic

I wonder if they don't want to make it too obvious by raising things to that level of fighting?

user-pic

Change of topic. I believe Colin Powell goes on Meet the Press tomorrow morning. I'm full of anticipation. Will he actually break with the Republicans, who have basically made his entire career? For some reason that seems far-fetched to me, despite his complementary remarks about Obama in months past. I worry about a really big surprise: an endorsement of McCain. Now that will make headlines. An Obama endorsement, by contrast, would probably get a "black man endorses black man" shrug. Anyone has any thoughts on this?

user-pic

I wouldn't worry about the McCain endorsement....from everything I've read, he's worried about the number of neocons McCain has surrounded himself with.

That said, I would be very surprised if he comes out and directly endorses Obama. The reports seem to be indicating that it will be an implicit endorsement rather than an explicit one.

user-pic

But two weeks before such a hugely important election, you don't make a headline appearance on Meet the Press to announce you're sitting on the fence. Do you?

user-pic

Not unless you're Colin Powell, who prefers to speaks truth to power in private.

user-pic

Though a simple statement re: patriotism and that Obama cares deeply about the future of this country, even if short of a full endorsement, would undercut a lot of McW's been up to lately....

user-pic

KeegsMom, If the American people were fully apprised of McCain's failings and faults, Obama's victory would seem not so great, considering the cranky old corrupt fool he beat.
Obama let McCain, out of consideration for an old man's feelings, retain possesion of his myths about himself. And Obama will still beat the pants offa him. Sorta shows what those myths are worth. And if Obama doesn't attack them, then McCain doesn't get to put up a defense, either. Maybe Obama felt McCain's defense of his myths might do McCain more good than the myths themselves. That is often the way.

user-pic

Am i the only one to notice that the calls and smears seem to be working? Obama's edge has gone down in the tracking polls by one point each day of the last five in a row.
the republicans are addicted to smears--especially those of the 'unamerican' type, because they WORK.
has anyone at DNC or Obama HQ figured out how to fight these partiotism smears???? i haven't, but someone better, and fast.

user-pic

No, you're not the only one to notice, and I posted on that topic earlier, but received mostly scorn and skepticism. I do think the poison is having its effect. It's impossible for it not to. What to do? I say fight fire with fire. Now!

user-pic

If it's a McCain endorsement, they've managed to keep it uncharacteristically quiet--and engaged in uncharacteristic advance planning.

Plus, there's Powell's well known antipathy towards the Bush Admin (many on Mccain's team) for the way he was used in the run up to the war.

That being said--I wouldn't rule it out. It's hard for a man with Powell's military background to break with the idea of military experience.

user-pic

I think, hope, believe he will endorse Obama.

user-pic

I can't believe that Colin Powell would or could endorse a ticket with Sarah Palin on it -- especially as a VP to a 72 year old man with history of cancer. Powell worked hard for his education and success, and is very, very careful with words and has an amazing vocabulary. Palin must be like fingernails on a blackboard to him, and then of course is the wild national security risk she poses. So I'm hoping for am Obama endorsement with Palin being given as one of the chief reasons. Hey, one can dream, can't they? He has standing, I think, to address her disasterous weaknesses head on ....... and for someone who stayed loyal to the party even after he was used and trashed by Bush, it would mean all the more if this threat to America is what finally made him leave.

user-pic

I must have missed the Palin interview, the one with follow-ups, that asked pointed questions about TrooperGate and her multiple claims that she was fully vindicated.

user-pic

It's at the ADN (Anchorage Daily News)

www.adn.com

They actually have an audio recording, which is fascinating in that she largely loses the Fargo accent with local reporters who know her, and who would hardly buy it.

user-pic

I'd read the whole report but had not heard this interview. Thanks. Her change of voice is amazing.


user-pic

No prob. I'm surprised that media haven't jumped on that.

user-pic

You're welcome--it's a nice example of Palin's real voice, though difficult to hear at first.

user-pic

Can Colin Powell go back in time and un-say his UN speech on Iraq's WMD? If he could, his endorsement might mean something. I hope he endorses Obama, tho.

You know, it just occurred to me. It's been what, six years, and not one of the things (WMDs) Powell mentioned at his UN speech has had any part in the war. Not one.

user-pic

I believe he's already repented of that, hasn't he? I can't remember the exact words or context, but I seem to remember him saying something to the effect U.N. fraud was the low point in his career. Anyone remember?

user-pic

errata: "something to the effect that the U.N. intelligence fraud" etc.

user-pic

"Former US secretary of state Colin Powell says his United Nations speech making the case for the US-led war on Iraq was "a blot" on his record."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200509/s1456650.htm

user-pic

Maybe Rick Davis has a tiered approach to increasing hatred. Hannity, the one-man racist rally, airs his radical Obama hourlong special this Sunday, part 2.

If it's true that McCain has broken every promise he's made thus far, then it's inevitable that Rev. Wright will come up again, big time.

They fielded Ayers as an appetizer, and Obama's relationship with him was fleeting.

Rev. Wright, well, that's 20 years of friendship. It's visceral, and if you've seen some of the people at Palin rallies, it might incite
rage and desperation--which creates inevitable violence and all they need is for one person to go too far.

The McCain campaign dismisses what's going on as "it's just one or two fringe characters that get out of line."

But when you consider some of the tragedies in our history, that's all it takes.

There is a cowardice that emanates from the McCain campaign--they get other people to do their dirty work.


user-pic

I wish I could say you were wrong, but this indeed is a 'worst case' scenario (for Obama supporters) and one that, tragically, could work. The only hope is that the Obama campaign has known all along that McCain's promise probably wouldn't hold and is prepared -- somehow -- to push back. And a nasty push back is possible: Hagee, Parsley, the witch doctor laying hands on Palin, her current church's campaign to 'cure' gays with prayer, etc. Maybe mutual disgust would cancel out? (And there is a great deal *positive* that can be said about Wright - his Audacity of Hope sermon is truly moving and praiseworthy. Plus the absence of any other ugly clips from a 30-year career that is almost all on video or audio tape.)

Still, having seen the reaction of others when the Wright clips first came out and, to be honest, had my own feelings to deal with, I wonder how many people who haven't been paying attention before would be seeing them for the first time?

On the other hand, I think McCain knows that if he does indeed go to that depth, he will lose any remaining shred of credibility he has with his colleages in the Senate. IF he retains enough control to stop his campaign, that is.

user-pic

Elizabeth, Hagee, the witch doctor, etc. are pretty damning, but when I first saw that Rev. Wright video compilation, the one Sean Hannity put together, it was powerful. I had to research on my own to discover that most of Rev. Wright's sermons were quite uplifting.

But the perfect prelude to Rev. Wright's G-damn America, is the McCain campaign's recent "un-American" rhetoric.

I don't want to see it happen, believe me.

If it does, the Obama campaign has to make a carefully-measured calculation--to continue the trajectory of it's current and successful message about unity-or go extremely negative on McCain--Hagee, his poor veteran's rights voting record, perhaps delving deeper into the myth of McCain's honorable military service--


user-pic

We will know when MCcain is getting short on money.... the robocalls will start offering credit card protection in addition to sliming Obama

user-pic

Where has the $85 million of taxpayer money gone, anyway? Who is he paying to keep their mouths shut? Is Palin still being flown around with all those kids in tow or have they been left with granny? How many Joe the Plumbers has he hired? How many votes is he buying? How many thugs has he hired to intimidate voters on election day and hand out flyers telling people to vote on November 5 (like what they did in 2004)?

user-pic

LOL

user-pic

Nice to see TPM getting recognition. Bravo!

Fortunately I haven't received any robocalls. However, someone mentioned today that engaging robocallers in conversation, asking to speak with supervisors, etc., ties up their lines and can be quite entertaining for those who have the time.

user-pic

Truly a great idea!

user-pic

bigga: "Am i the only one to notice that the calls and smears seem to be working? Obama's edge has gone down in the tracking polls by one point each day of the last five in a row."
------------------
Not so sure it's the slime and robocalls that is causing the tightening. They are only in certain states -- and a general, across the board tightening was predicted in any event. I think it's more the swing of pro-Obama movement followed by "do we really want to?" questioning that you saw all through the primary. Someone writing to Andrew Sullivan (Daily Dish) described it as being like someone trying to make themselves jump off a high diving board -- go out to the end, retreat, go out again a little further, retreat again, and so on. That reader had faith that, in the end, the voters would gather up courage and jump, and that happened in the primaries. I think it's the same thing going on here. Voting for a black man, voting for someone who is different (if only in that he's smarter than most of the leaders we're used to), voting for someone who is new and unfamiliar .... all that is a bit frightening, but they really *want* to. I'd posted earlier, before all this current slime began, "how close is it going to get?" (so I could figure out when to seriously panic). There weren't many responses but a general feeling that if we could go into Nov. 4th with a ~ 6% lead, it would probably - hopefully - be okay. So, I think we'd see this tightening even if there hadn't been the new slime -- in fact, the slime could be minimizing what would happen naturally. Interviews with professional pollsters have indicated that this year, unlike previous elections, negative campaigning doesn't seem to be working -- at all. I think the magnitude of the Swiftboat attacks on Kerry followed by the disasterous 2nd term for Bush has finally gotten folks to wake up and do some thinking on their own.

user-pic

HEY! EVERYBODY! Right now, go check out Neil Young's website - http://www.neilyoung.com/

Click on 'Living With War' and read all about
one woman and her family's one week nightmare vacation with the McCain's in Fiji, circa 2000.

If you thought that the Rolling Stone profile was something, wait till you read this new account, courtesy of rocker Neil Young.

user-pic

History repeating with the karmic souls. Hear my prophecy. These are the returning souls from the adults of the '20s and '30s...just before the Reichstag fires...the economic situations are setting up for the great depression asking..."Did we learn anything from the past.
McCain/Palin may not have the brownshirt people yet but they are setting the nation up for them and sooner or later some thug leader will appear that they will follow will get them acting like they did in Germany toward the social democrats and the Gypsies and the Poles etc. setting up all the violence. But this time there will be greater resistance because of the black community.

The way to avoid what McCain is ignorantly setting up is to remove the conditions that made the appearance of the Nazi party possible.
This is the election that will give us the opportunity to change the road we are on. We must prevent the corporatocracy and fascist state quickly approaching. We must end the hypocrisy of the republican party and remove all of them from power positions.
In the words of Driftglass.com:(referring to Sullivan's comment)-"..."How does any decent person remain a Republican with this kind of crap?" (referring to the eyes superimposed over Osama with Obama’s from McCain mailer)
Because he is still very much a True Believer, Sully is not capable of looking Conservatism square in eye and seeing that Dubya and McSame are not its aberrations, but its apotheosis. He has shaken off some of the lesser, uglier doctrinal teachings of his faith, but still clings fiercely to the abstract, rapturous purity of its core dogma and will probably never be able to wrap his head around the fact that Ayn Rand's little wingnut terrarium is not a heroic creed, but a moral spider hole for misanthropes, rich degenerates and rich degenerate-wannabes.

It is gangsterism's safe-house where they can find constant reassurance that:

1. “The common good” is an evil delusion
2. Looking out for "the least of these" is a Socialist plot.
3. Looking out for Number One is next to Godliness.
4. And therefore the rules of courtesy, reciprocity, tolerance and prudence are strictly for suckers.

Conservatism – whatever it advertises on the box or promises from the pulpit – is a cult of rich and powerful solipsists deciding that any rules they make up for themselves are OK as long as it makes them a fat profit and that rest of humanity are merely expendable extras in their awesome, members-only circle jerk.

The Age of Dubya was not an accident or freak of circumstances, but the inevitable outcome of the ideology of people like Andrew Sullivan, and in the Age of Dubya, one can either be a Good American or a Good Republican, but one can no longer be both.

…"When fascism comes to America it will be stuffed into fuck-me pumps, with a wink that promises you the blowjob of your life, and eyes that scream Helter Skelter." -- driftglass

(Hello Palin)

user-pic

btw...every hundred years the souls reincarnate to learn to apply the lessons learned from their last incarnation and reap the Karma of that existence. People born 1900 would be 33 in 1933 for instance and reemerge in 2000 etc. How old were the people who caused the great depression,,,the "economic royalists"...they're back...so are the people who paved the way for the Nazis. Let us change the conditions and recognize history repeating again and prevent the repetition of all the violence. Obama is only the beginning of the end of the republican reign of destruction.

user-pic

Mooser, you say Obama will still beat the pants of McCain, but I'm seriously feeling concerned about the slippage in the polls... those phone calls can make a difference, i'm convinced. I do a lot of phone banking, and I hear a fair amount of uncertainty in people's voices, some real fence sitting.

In addition to wondering why the MSM and Obama surrogates aren't bringing up Hagee, Keating, secessionists, etc., i also wonder why BO isn't hitting harder with simple, honest, clean shots regarding

= McCain voted AGAINST the recent veterans act, which passed without him
= his voting with Bush over 90% of the time (I think BO has an ad with this in it now, but it should be talked up more)
= his flip flopping on Bush's tax plan, and CLEARLY emphasizing who is benefitting from it
= his flip flop on torture and waterboarding.
= he has a shoddy record when it comes to supporting our troops. This from VETERAN's FOR COMMON SENSE:

***John McCain skipped close to a dozen votes on Iraq, and on at least another 10 occasions, he voted against arming and equipping the troops, providing adequate rest for the troops between deployments and for health care or other benefits for veterans.***

He once took the high(er) road on some substantial issues but people need to be reminded how far he has fallen. If they're hitting BO where it hurts, they've gotta hit back. I think it can be done cleanly.

It's the MSM's job to remind people of the questionable relationships (Hagee, Liddy et al) and of Palin's extremism. WHY ARE THEY GETTING AWAY WITH *not* BRINGING UP THOSE THINGS?

(Sorry, I feel if I keep putting it out there, it will happen...)

user-pic

"domestic terrorist group that killed Americans" uhhh. . . wait. . . correct me if I'm wrong, but the Americans that they killed were other members of the Weather Underground that were casualties when their bomb factory accidentally leveled their own NYC townhouse. In other words they killed their fellow "domestic terrorists" (or is McCain opposed to killing "domestic terrorists" now?)

(To be fair there were other bombings attributed to the Weathermen that killed innocents including one police officer, but since the Weathermen were meticulous in trying to avoid human casualties it is doubtful that these other bombings were indeed perpetrated by the Weathermen).

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address