Biden Won, Because He Made Forceful Case Against McCain
Many people will analyze this debate by asking whether Sarah Palin outdid her previous disastrous interview performances, and hence proved she just might have the mettle to be a Vice President, after all.
But a better way to decide who "won" tonight is this: Which Veep candidate most forcefully made the case against the opposing presidential candidate?
By that standard, the winner by that measure was unquestionably Joe Biden. He made a far stronger case against John McCain than Sarah Palin did against Barack Obama. It wasn't even close.
Tellingly, Biden was the first to target the other ticket's presidential candidate, laying into McCain over his "fundamentals of the economy" gaffe, a core contrast point for the Obama campaign. That immediately forced Palin to go on the defensive -- in the context of a discussion of the presidential candidates -- which she did with the silly argument that McCain's "fundamentals" line was a reference to American workers.
Biden also drew a devastatingly sharp contrast between Obama and McCain on Iraq. While Biden admittedly wasn't at his best at times during the first half, when the debate drifted onto foreign policy turf, Biden clearly found his footing, and then some. He stared right into the camera as he made the case as clearly as you could ask for.
"We're spending $10 billion a month while the Iraqis have an $80 billion surplus. Barack says it's time for them to spend their own money," he said. "This is a fundamental difference between us: We will end this war. For John McCain, there is no end in sight to end this war. Fundamental difference: We will end this war." And Biden hit a very strong riff on how McCain's foreign policies are indistinguishable from those of George W. Bush.
To be clear, Palin did outperform in many ways tonight, and did clear a basic competence bar. She was far more in command of the material than she has been in her catastrophic interviews. And there's no reason to doubt the reports we're hearing about relief and even elation in Republican and conservative circles.
It's also true that Palin did get in some blows on Obama, hitting him somewhat effectively over his willingness to meet with foreign leaders and blasting him for waving the "white flag of surrender" in Iraq.
But here's the key: Even on those issues where Palin did score with base-pleasing hits on Obama or Biden, the unshakable reality underlying all this is that public opinion agrees with the Obama-Biden view on the core questions discussed tonight. And Biden seemed to proceed from a firm understanding of this point, articulating a big-picture contrast between Obama and McCain on the economy and on foreign policy with gusto and intensity.
That will prove far more consequential than whatever narrow success Palin had in outdoing previous expectations, and in proving her own baseline competence. And as a result -- this being a race between two would be presidents, after all -- the public will give this debate to Biden by sizable margins.















I thought Biden won it when he laid out the "McCain is NOT a maverick" points.
That absolutely killed in my eyes.
October 3, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was the I know Kennedy, your no kennedy, moment.
October 3, 2008 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry I'm so late. Did I miss anything? I wanted to watch the debate, but all my Markets were hungry and I had to run to the store and they were out of Maberick fuel so I had to wave the white flag of surrender to get a ride back. Do I still get extra credit?
October 3, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
He is a PINTO!
October 3, 2008 3:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a witty analogy, and it fits perfectly! Remember that Pintos used to blow up if rear-ended (because the gas tank was in the back)!
October 3, 2008 6:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's one flub which I found more amusing...
"John McCain's maverick position that he's in, that's really prompt up to and indicated by the supporters that he has. Look at Lieberman, and Giuliani, and Romney, and Lingle, and all of us who come from such a diverse background of -- of policy and of partisanship, all coming together at this time, recognizing that HE IS THE MAN THAT WE NEED TO LEAVE -- lead..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ0klLngnzY
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/debate.transcript/
October 3, 2008 4:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh... and it's not Lingle, Sarah... it's Dingel.
...and you forgot Prancer, Rudolph and ol' Slappy Joe!
October 3, 2008 4:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he hurt McCain by pointing out that McCain "voted not to fund the troops" when he voted against the mirror image bill Obama voted against. The talking point is tripe and now trash.
The "McCain is not a maverick on anything that matters to regular Americans" argument at the end will haunt McCain tell the end of the election.
October 3, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love how Biden and Obama are going on the offense of late. Really attacking hard and putting McCain on the defensive. I don't think they saw it coming.
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
My favorite thing about the debate was how Palin had two or three smears (like the "cut off funding" thing) that she knew were wrong, and she knew Biden would refute, so she tried to make them stick by just repeating it over and over... Biden did an amazing job of, every time she repeated the smear, he'd REPEAT THE REFUTATION. He absolutely refused to let her get away with it even once. I was like, holy crap, that's the first time I've ever seen that particular favored tactic of the right successfully parried.
October 3, 2008 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree this was truly important. Huge, actually. In fact, I think the Obama-Biden ticket won tonight even based solely on the fact that Biden pulverized the "maverick" brand in front of an audience of tens of millions. Biden, having worked in the Senate for so long with McCain and shown his historical record considerable respect even during the campaign, was the person with the credibility to attack that label. There was perhaps no better time to do that than tonight. And Palin, by relying on the "maverick" idea all night, totally set it up for him.
October 3, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, yes, yes. They're not accepting these bullshit frames and arguments any more. They're exposing them as ridiculous political ploys. A new kind of politics indeed!
October 3, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, Biden is still accepting the "funding for The Troops" scam.
I haven't been around for too many wars, but I've never heard of the notion that funding for a conflict is actually for The Troops themselves, until Iraq and the Bushies.
It's a ridiculous argument, and now it's to the point where even Biden repeats it as though it's just a simple fact.
This has got to end. Whether we're talking about Iraq, Obama, McCain or anything else, as long as this ridiculous frame lasts, we're in silly-land.
October 3, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Contextually, Biden used that as a foil to deconstruct the "Voted against funding the troops!" trope.
October 3, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
You may be right. But if Biden and Obama tried to rebut their argument by pointing out what you have, people would think they were being evasive and not really responding directly to the charges leveled against them. Unfortunately, once you're smeared like that, you have to use the same kind of language to refute the charge, or risk looking like you're giving the classic political non-answer. If people think you're not answering, they assume it's because you can't, and the charge sticks.
October 3, 2008 2:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Biden actually did perfectly on that point, IMHO. The reason is that Obama and McCain voted against the same bill - but for different reasons.
All they have to do is point out that McCain voted the same way on the same military appropriation, and the talking point is defused. Notice that Obama doesn't bring it up himself; he just responds to it when McCain brings it up.
October 3, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't see most of the debate, but I have to ask - what on earth does it mean to say that these blows were 'effective'? That she had a good substantive point, or that it was the kind of substance-free red meat that the conservative base gobbles up, and therefore redeems her in their eyes?
If the latter, then I still don't see how that is necessarily 'effective' in any meaningful sense for the Reep campaign. The Reeps shouldn't have to be shoring up the base with a month to go before the election, no? It's the indies that they need to go after, and merely echoing obvious talking points doesn't seem to be working this year.
October 3, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
My impression is that persuading the indies was not part of Palin's agenda. That is why Biden did so well. While we were all a twitter that Palin didn't wet her pants, Biden was very effectively laying into McCain. He had 45 unopposed minutes to rain hell on McCain and he did.
October 3, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
October 3, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
A word cloud of Biden's remarks -- he was able to bloody McCain and Palin had no defense.
October 3, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, that's the point really, she may have made a good point, but did it sway an undecided to the McCain camp.
In most cases it was probably neutral. She didn't hurt McCain's chances, but she wasn't compelling enough to snag them.
October 3, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the CNN insta-approvalmeter in the hands of Columbus OH undecideds is any indication, Palin's attacks (especially the "surrender" bullshit) pretty much fell flat, while Biden's corrections of the record were well-received.
Palin managed not to puke on her pumps, but that's about the best that can be said for her.
Even the one woman on the CNN Columbus panel who said her mind had been changed by Palin to vote for McCain (who looked and spoke suspiciously like a pageant girl herself) later raised her hand when the panel was asked who thought that Obama would win the election!
October 3, 2008 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point about whether the blows were substantial. The "white flag of surrender" was red meat tripe. However, she did remind everyone that Biden said in the primaries that Obama wasn't ready and Biden didn't respond to that directly.
She had a couple minor hits but, you know what people will remember in my opinion? The fact that she DODGED QUESTIONS! And the everlovin' winking...
jeebus.
October 3, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup yup! I know she made jabs - that's not what I'm disputing. I just don't know if they were 'effective' in any real sense.
And what I continue to be fascinated by in this campaign (maybe just because I'm really paying close attention this time) is how the public and the pundits seem to be noticing the same things I am - and in this case, what you mention, the meta-narrative of Palin dodging questions. I guess it was pretty obvious, but still, it's just nice to see that type of evasiveness not glossed over just because it's coming from a pretty face.
PALIN DODGES QUESTIONS. That's the take-away point from this debate. Or at least it oughta be.
October 3, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I saw that reference to Biden's primary comments too.
That is a question that's best to dodge, I think. Even if the most effective answer is given, it still leaves Biden on defense, and opens the door for more wedge stuff.
(BTW, I believe the best answer there is, "When Barack and I first debated, no, I didn't think he was ready to be President. But when you debate a guy as many times as we have, when you watch his campaign stay on message, take hits in the media and come back stronger each time, when you see how people of all races, generations and background gravitate to his message of change and his plans for America, you realize that not only is Barack Obama ready to lead America, but also that America desperately needs a leader like Barack Obama.")
October 3, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I cringed at the white flag comment, and I did so as I knew that was not going to fly well with anyone on either side. Doesn't ring true.
October 3, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does simply saying something when you have the floor make it so? Does it make the statement effective? Other than the PNAC crowd, who believed her? So, she attacked Obama, just attacking him doesn't make it effective. Did you think that Biden fumbled, mumbled, or let her get away with it unchallenged?
October 3, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Greg or anybody in the community, can you tell me
At times she kept raising issues about Obamas voting record.
At the very end, Gwen asked a question about What changes you've had or made.
Bidens was about his change of attitude about another mans motives.
Did Palin then say she wished she didn't have to veto something she regrets having to do, Something like that
If it is what I heard and could understand, is she not hypocritical to assume that others may have regrets too. Or her elitism, gives her the ability to be one of us, but not Obama.
October 3, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
CNN Debate Poll
Biden 51
Palin 36
CBS Debate Poll
Biden 46
Palin 21
Tie 33
CNN Focus Group: Won by Biden
October 3, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, excellent returns. And did you see how many people raised their hands among the undecided to indicate that they had decided to go ahead and vote for Obama? There were many. Only one raised her hand for McCain on the same question.
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good Biden strategy - several times he tied McCain not to Bush but to Cheney, thus trying to reduce the 28-ers down to 13-ers (or whatever is Cheney's popularity status right now).
October 3, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, I predict we will never hear the word Maverick again. She used it several times and each time the lines dipped sharply. The GOPnicks will notice this and tell everyone not to use the word any more as it has a negative effect. Especially after Biden destroyed the idea in what was probably the most powerful tirade of the night.
October 3, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just got back from a customer appreciation barbecue at a band rehearsal facility on the North Side of Chicago this evening. There was a small TV on a table in the corner of the yard, and a crowd of people were watching the debates. As I went over to catch up on the action, somebody yelled, "she said 'Maverick' again, EVERYBODY DRINK!"
It's a big joke.
October 3, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you wear a goatee and a beret in hopes that people will think you are some kind of intellectual or Bohemian then you're making a fool of yourself. If you have to go around saying "I'm a maverick" then you are no such thing. Real intellectuals read and think; they don't care what people think of them. Real mavericks don't vote with an ideological party line all the time. She was dum.
October 3, 2008 6:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The maverick's eponym was a guy who refused to brand his cattle--McCain is putting the branding iron to anything he can get his hands on. (Ironically, it was because Samuel Maverick had no interest in being a rancher!)
October 3, 2008 6:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Toobin: "How many votes were shifted, not many."
Says it all.
October 3, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good to hear.
October 3, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin disqualified herself when she refused to answer saying"I have been in this thing for 5 months".
Well take your time, go back to Alaska and come back when you are ready
October 3, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was definitely a blunder moment for her.
October 3, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Got nothin in her muffins!
October 3, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually; she said that she has been in it for five weeks, which made it far worse, because she was telling the voters that she has only five weeks experience in getting ready to be a possible President. McCain died before the convention, it is the face bump that is still alive.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
when Biden almost cried. He had me, and he had america. That moment will live on forever. I havent seen a man say enough is enough with all this rhetoric bullshit in my life. Biden said, without saying anything, goddamn it, you dont own this issue...biden killed "folksy" palin with that moment.
October 3, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn right. He *owned her* on that and I think he may have really hit a few men too. Folks can relate to the feeling of trying to be strong when discussing something painful, you don't think anything is going to happen but all of the sudden the emotions well up.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
during all my life i have seen my father cry twice, when his father died and during the memorial of 9/11 at yankee stadium. This reminded me of that moment.
October 3, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
About a month ago, when Palin was first picked, I wrote a diary where I said that Biden has been preparing for this moment, and in fact this exact opponent for his entire life.
That was the moment I was talking about. With that, he obliterated Palin's style of personality politics, and busted it into a thousand tiny pieces.
October 3, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah that was a powerful moment. I turned to my wife and I said, he just won the debate (and I believe it was a totally sincere moment).
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen!
October 3, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Knowing the Republicans, they'll twist this choking up, as an Ed Muskie moment
October 3, 2008 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Forget the pundits, the people have spoken. Biden won with the public hands down.
http://www.mediacurves.com/
October 3, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, very cool. Look at those independent numbers, wow. And also look how high the number of Republicans crossed over for Biden relative to the number of Dems who crossed over to McCain. Very interesting numbers.
October 3, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shorter Pat Buchanan: "Palin doesn't have to come up with facts because she's really cute."
October 3, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, duh.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was the sense I got. He said "attractive" one too many times for my taste.
October 3, 2008 1:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just one?
October 3, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can't agree about the white flag comment, that was a very low moment for her. Hesitant, then stated without confidence, it was plain ugly to witness.
October 3, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
it just seemed that she was looking thru her notecards and found that one and pulled it out. Talkingpointsmemo might be the name of this sight, but tonight she fucking owned the titled talkings points.
October 3, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
sight-site. whatever
October 3, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
"White flag of surrender" is the kind of claptrap that even NASCAR dads reject at this point. I don't see how you can claim that her dragging out the "surrender" taunt constitutes an effective attack on Obama.
She may have made it through to the end without running off stage in tears, but all that served to do was show off her unlikeable characteristics and robotic qualities. I think she scared a lot of people today. She has no humility whatsoever about the job she's been asked to take on. That reads loud and clear in a million unspoken ways.
Epic fail.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden won, hands down.
Freep these polls!:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/2/224641/188/979/618368
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I found Biden honest, responsive, and thoughtful. He was smart and understandable when he talked about domestic and foreign policy. Loved his answer on changing the tone of Washington, among many other answers.
I found Palin somewhat creepy. It was the canned lines, forced folksy talk, over-the-top mugging, and apparent inability to directly answer a question. Her dismissiveness of the actual debate made me think of Bush and Cheney and their dismissiveness of little things like laws. If this had been an actual debate where Palin would have been pushed to be specific, she would have resorted to the same kinds of pathetic tap dancing she did in her interviews with Couric and GIbson.
October 3, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I found Palin somewhat creepy"--YES, once again style and one's manner is so important to the voter. I would describe her tonight as snarky. Attack, attack, and attack using mistatements of fact, i.e. lies. She turned people off just like McCain did in his debate. Why is it that the ordinary viewer sees this so much quicker and clearer than the TV experts??
October 3, 2008 1:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
This shit wasn't even close. The debate was over when Biden hit McCain on the windfall tax. After that, the wind was out of Palin's sails.
October 3, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
While they were in Arizona, cramming for the debate partly by teaching her how to recite various foreign leader's names, how hard would it have been to break her of saying nukyular? I saw somewhere that they had written it for her convention speech on the teleprompter as new-clear. I guess it takes more than a few rehearsals to reverse a lifetime of hick-speak.
October 3, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Geez, do I hate it when people pronounce "nuclear" that way. I don't understand..why is it such a difficult word for people to say? Can someone explain this to me?
October 3, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
ha!
I had same thought (as noted below).
Hmm.... seems somebody else we know calls it Nukular. Who was that guy? A bit of a buffoon as I recall. Not too good with the finer points of the english language.
October 3, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's busy trying to put food on his family. They've been resisting...
October 3, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've heard pundits say that mispronouncing nuclear and Iraq connects well with non-elitist voters.
October 3, 2008 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he won because he knows how to pronounce Nuclear.
October 3, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with goodstuff that was Biden's best moment. But the rest of you are scoring this like a college debate. That's not the point. It's all style, and on that Palin won, because nobody called out her phony answers that just reverted to memorized talking points. So to most peple she sounded articulate and much less zany than she has been painted. Gwen Ifill was clearly intimidated by the McCain's assualt on her objectiveity, so she never called out Palin for not answering her (generally softball) questions. Biden missed hitting a home run by never sayin: "I love your scripted answer, Governor, but just once please answer the question." Why not? Because he was afraid the Mc Cain campaign would call him out. Sad.
October 3, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, what makes you believe that Palin won? The polls don't seem to back that assertion up.
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
He just does not get it. Biden's job was to attack McCain, and he did that with great success. Biden would have been foolish to come down to Sarah's level and feud with her on her terms.
October 3, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just can't agree with that assessment. I scored it a fail.
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's all style, and on that Palin won
Nope. You're dead wrong about that. What counts in this kind of debate are the things that the voters SAY counts. The voters clearly disagree with you as well, based on the polls.
Furthermore, this a *change election*. That fact indicates support for the idea that 'style' points count very little except insofar as they add or detract from the credibility of the debater.
Since we're talking about style though, I thought that Palin's style came off as smarmy and arrogant. Are you watching the dial responses on CNN right now? Watch the 'woman' line when she winks, scrunches her nose, and does the perky cheerleader act. Not good, I would say.
October 3, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Co-sign. Depends on how one defines "style"...
Her style will not sway anyone except the "over eager, sexist interviewee" demographic.
October 3, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
yup. Buchanan has become a parody of his former self. Roger Simon looked like a smitten school boy. Hannity...sigh ...yeah well Hannity is as Hannity does, I guess. It's a good thing these poeple have lost whatever credibility they ever had.
October 3, 2008 1:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
What debate were YOU watching?
You fail to understand the rules of the debate. Ifill wasn't allowed to do follow-up. There wasn't much time for it anyway, given the timing rules. BTW, those were changes the McCain camp demanded. Wonder why?....
Also, you fail to recognize the numerous times where Biden flatly contradicted Palin's statements.
This debate is going to be ultimately viewed a lot like the first one. The longer people have to review the content and style of the debaters, the worse it will be for the Republican ticket.
October 3, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
The defining moments were Biden getting emotional speaking about his family and understanding what average Americans have to go through and his attack on McCain not being a 'maverick'...
And the line 'The past is a prologue to the future' was the best single line of the debate.
Palin didn't implode as was anticipated but when this debate is dissected Biden is a clear winner on style and substance. Palin did not answer one question with specifics and often just ignored questions altogether and her statement on the role of the VP (blurring the lines of separation of power) will come back to haunt her...
No knockout but a very good night for Obama/Biden.
October 3, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I cringed a little at "prologue to the future" - just a bit too sophisticated for the phrase to live on in history. I think "preview of the future" would have worked a whole lot better
October 3, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hear you but I think it will still play well though...it was the final, and strongest, point Biden made in driving home the McCain-Bush connection. Biden signaled that he and Obama are, correctly and accurately, not letting McSame off the hook for supporting Bush as much as he has.
October 3, 2008 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes I thought Biden ended excellently too. I was really impressed overall- at many points he demonstrated what I think is the most impressive characteristic of a public speaker - poise. Obama, in his debate, always seemed just a few cerebrating milliseconds shy of this magical state.
I thought another candidate for most memorable Biden line was "A maverick he is not" but maybe that even could have been better, if a little more acidic, as "A maverick in his own mind".
October 3, 2008 6:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Biden's close was miles better than Palin's.
October 3, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
the good thing about these snap polls is that they force the main stream media to speak more truthfully.
October 3, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Less untruthfully" might be the more accurate phrase. After both this debate and last week's, the media, while grudgingly acknowledging the voters' responses a little bit, have persisted in trying to push the "draw" narrative. And the fact that their initial default assessments in both cases have been to the McCain side of the voters is very telling, IMO, either of their bias or their assumption that voters use the most superficial of criteria in judging the debate performances.
October 3, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I think they're bending over backward to be "fair" and won't state what is obvious until the polls make it OK.
October 3, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am glad that Palin taunted Senator Biden with that White Flag insult. It showed the voters that she is a vicious little guttersnipe, that was playing right out of the Bush/Cheney playbook.
Here is the conclusion I was left with:
If American Elect Obama/Biden they will be getting two Presidents.
If Americans Elect McCain/Palin they will be getting, at best, three quarters of a President.
October 3, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder in private what Cindy McCain says and thinks about Palin? Really, polar opposites. Miss stuck up, can't smile, insincere rich bitch looking down on the masses, and Miss "you betcha!" I would love to hear the comments.
October 3, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amelie,
I think Cindy is just another one of those vapid Stepford wives that Republican men all seem to latch on to.
Like I have always said: If you want to keep your beer cold, put it next to a republican woman's heart.
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Liam, that is too funny !
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
cindy mccain thinks?!
October 3, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I respectfully disagree. I suspect Cindy McCain has a strong distaste for Sarah Palin, and probably thinks she resembles some of the women with whom McCain has had affairs.
Here's a perspective that's been bouncing around in my head, though I am not settled on it. Cindy McCain runs her own business / trust fund / whatever it is rich people do. She's been cheated on, has gone through drug problems and rehab, and takes a lot of abuse from John McCain even now. From their interactions, the two are clearly not close, and perhaps it's that Cindy's quite independent of John. If that's the case, then her icy coldness is a matter of disliking John, pretending she wants him to be president, and just hating it all.
To which I say, "Sucks to be her," though in many ways she chose this for herself.
October 3, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm totally with you.
Sarah is the kind of woman women do not like - and I've had a whole bunch of women tell me that.
And take a good long look at Cindy McCain sometime - I would not cross her. Sarah Palin is Salmon Chum to someone like Cindy McLame.
October 3, 2008 1:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Look - Cindy McLame is in society - for real. You honestly think someone on her level thinks Sarah Palin is anything other than excedingly low rent and way way too adorable?
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, quite simply.
October 3, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, I think Cindy is abusing some substance at this point. Don't know if she's back on prescription drugs or alcohol, but she's definitely high 90% of the time.
October 3, 2008 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
That could be. But I've known some similarly fuckedup rich women and I wouldn't cross even the dumb ones.
They don't fuck around - they just cut you off at the knees. She has very serious money.
October 3, 2008 1:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If a debate is scored on superficial generalities, faux folksiness and bridges to canned talking points, Palin did well, but Biden was terrific. Substantive, authoritive, yet also the more human of the two. It is comical to listen to Buchanan, Hannity and Dick Morris trying to trumpet Palin as the next "Great Communicator." She won something by not being the train wreck like the interviews, but she cannot seriously be considered for a VP on a ticket with a 72 year old Pres.
October 3, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't the Republicans use to be the party of governing with competence? Now all of a sudden someone should be vp because she winks at the camera and is super adorable.
October 3, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
i'm sorry, somebody once said that mccain sounded like an echo of the 20th century in his last debate. Palin said the same crap everytime she talked about Ronald Reagan. Reagan was not this iconic shit that people want us to believe that he was, he sucked. And god damn it, Palin proves that Reagan was all lines and no substance.
October 3, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden really ripped McCain a new one, tonight. He did it with a smile and in a civil manner, but his attacks were devastating. I'm sure McCain is seething as usual. And poor Palin was stuck repeating talking points, unable to answer charges.
October 3, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin was head bayoneted and didn't even realize it. In her case it probably isn't a vital organ.
October 3, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
She might be leaking lipstick.
October 3, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Roger Simon make Tweety look compelling.
He's one of the pundits who ran with the meme that if Palin just showed up, she won.
What an idiot!
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Isnt he a Politico pundit?
The Politico is a rightwing spin outfit.
Just saying.
October 3, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
He certainly has the wingnut cocky, self-assuredness in anything he says like W and Buchanan.
October 3, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now I see that this Roger Simon assclown said "Mac is Back!" after the 1st debate.
Sounds like he's destined for Faux Noise.
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ed Rollins, a Republican, and Paul Begalla seem to think that tonight Gov Plain laid her marker for 2012. If Gov Plain is already looking at 2012, then she must know this thing is over and rather than McCain using her she is using him.
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she's who the wingnutz want to tie there star on for the future, I say "Yippee!"
October 3, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
for 2012 its Gov Plain vs Huckabee vs Mitt Romney. And we all know that the latter two were taking notes from Biden as to how to handle a woman.
October 3, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
By 2012, the religious right and this whole nightmare will be long gone. She's going exactly no where.
I mean maybe to jail in Alaska.
That's too silly. The Democrats are getting ready to hold the majority for years.
I believe that. We held it for 40 goddamn years. The Repugs had it for 12 and totally FAILED. Not just a little bit - totally.
October 3, 2008 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I look forward to the first Obama-Palin presidential debate.
October 3, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be fucking hilarious... I can just see Obama with a "WTF?!?!?" look on his face the first time she goes into one of her incoherent, unrelated soliloquies.
October 3, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
She'll be back.
But she will still be an intellectual lightweight and an incredible liar. She will fizzle like Fred Thompson, the last one the rabid right pretended was the "next Ronald Reagan". LOL
October 3, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really do not think so.
Her day and the day of her kind is over. It's done. This movement is dead.
It's a late movement. It's deceased.
The only place she's going is back to Alaska, where she is not going to be re-elected.
She's going to totally disappear.
October 3, 2008 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll stop just short of saying that Joe Biden, tonight, sealed Obama's victory. Anything can happen, and might, in this insane election, but he laid out the need for an Obama administration as clearly as could be done. What a remarkable performance by Biden tonight.
October 3, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden's best performance to date according to CNN...
No game change, tomorrow is back to the economy.
And the troopergate investigation will continue according to the judge.
October 3, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
A repost...
I think Palins strategy was to out middle class roots Bidens middle class roots.
I don't see how she will ever connect with the middle class. Joe is real, people understand him, and his life struggles are compelling. Palin comes across as a material career girl who never really gave of herself, only took for herself. Average people don't identify with that; they hold it as something to not become.
And her jab at the "east coast" well by tommorrow there will be some explaining to do of that one ( hello New Hampshire and Pennsylvania Sarah doesn't like you ). That is going to come back to haunt her.
And last of all, when your from Alaska you might as well be from Russia it's that far removed from the rest of the United States. Note how thin the stories of her life were. People hear Alaska, and they think baked. People hear Ohio they think America ( and hopefully it will be a blue state in a few weeks ).
October 3, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, wtf? Does she want to LOSE in places like PA, VA, NC, FL??? All "East Coasters".
I'm glad she said that. Just goes to show what a bigot hater she is. Very prejudiced, ignorant and narrow-minded.
"I betcha didn't know we get newspapers up here in Alaska!"
Um, actually, I kind of assumed you did. Sorry, your prejudiced vew of how us 48ers have woefully condescending views of Alaska is kind of insulting, asshole.
October 3, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was too - that was a dumb mistake except insofar as preaching to the choir goes.
October 3, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I liked your post the first time, but there really isn't any need to repeat it.
October 3, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "white flag" bit went over like a lead balloon with the public.
I don't know who the hell told her it was a good idea to say that, but they blew it.
October 3, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
The line about the "white flag" annoyed me, but not quite as much as the "hey, let's stop playing the blame game!" shit. You're running on the basis of policies closely in line with an abysmal administration - get used to the criticism.
October 3, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Forget the Palin "expectations" meme...for me, it was Biden who far surpassed expectations. I thought he was close to perfect, given the situation he was walking into (an opponent who would be declared a moral victor if she simply managed to speak and not slobber on herself). And look at that MediaCurves poll...clearly, Biden won the independents going away. At best, Palin stops the bleeding of the GOP base and perhaps keeps McCain from continuing to freefall in the polls. At best. She sure didn't do anything to reassure indie/undecided voters. As distance is gained on this debate, Biden will look better and better. She hardly ever answered the questions! Good gawd, she was given such a pass, what with no followup and all...she kept babbling about energy policy even when it had nothing to do with the topic, winked (!) and also waaaaaay overdid her trademark folksiness. What was authentic to begin with now sounds very self-conscious and forced...and not as effective.
Count me as a Democrat who was very, very concerned about a Palin comeback narrative emerging from tonight's debate, and who feels better and better about what went down as I think back on it (and look at the polls coming out). If Obama can hold his own in next week's town hall, I'll REALLY start to feel good about where we're heading.
October 3, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Count me as a Democrat who was very, very concerned about a Palin comeback narrative emerging from tonight's debate, and who feels better and better about what went down as I think back on it (and look at the polls coming out). If Obama can hold his own in next week's town hall, I'll REALLY start to feel good about where we're heading."
Me too. The MSM probably won't notice, but many Dems were nervous about a spectactular performance, or at least some game changing gaffe or nasty pitbull attack.
But instead, Biden won decisively. She didn't trip over, but she barely got thru 90 minutes with her notes and talking points.
I'm feeling good. Fired up and ready to go.
October 3, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
You called it pretty closely, Greg. You had it ending up like this going in.
Excellent job on blogging this one. :)
October 3, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden was terrific: thoughtful, knowledgeable, avuncular, engaging. He could not have been better. I think he'll be a terrific VP.
Palin memorized 30 short speeches (or maybe they were implanted in her brain) and then presented them, sometimes queasily-folksy, other times like somebody who had just memorized the Gettysburg address and was praying that she didn't slip into the Pledge of Allegiance by mistake; sometimes when the speeches were appropriate, sometimes when they were complete non sequiturs. Palin was going through her speeches, one by one, gosh darnit, and the Mainstream Media could just try to stop her.
Gwen Ifill, unfortunately, was awful. She could have e-mailed her questions for all the interactivity and spontaneity she brought to the debate; I think there was only a single moment when she actually responded to one of Palin's inane remarks. I don't think (and I certainly hope) that this will hurt Obama in any way, but it is yet another reminder that a lousy press corps does serious damage to the nation. Too bad Katie Couric didn't moderate. She recognized and called Palin on her BS. I think Palin would have folded under even moderate pressure, but she got none and muddled through. But really: The White House?
October 3, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Time to send some e-mails to Miss Gwen, shall we?
That was pathetic "moderating".
October 3, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have to say that I was pretty disappointed in the caliber of the questions. They seemed fairly standard....bailout? check. wedge social issue like gay marriage? check. Iraq? check. and so on.
I can see where the subject matters were important...but the questions weren't even asked in a novel sort of way.
Personally, I think the pressure from the right over the past day might've gotten to her.
October 3, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe so. But I've watched the NewsHour for a long time and I just don't think Ifill is very strong. So Palin lives on, but I think she will continue to be an albatross around McCain's neck. And they will live in terror of her saying something idiotic which, in all likelihood, she will do.
So it's all good.
October 3, 2008 1:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah you could be right about the pressure. So strange to me to think a respected journalist would give two minutes thought to that. At the very *least* she should've called Palin on not answering the questions.
But, "by their own rope they shall hang" I guess-meaning maybe the public will see Palin for hwo she really is...
October 3, 2008 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, possibly worst Palin moment of the night: "I've only been at this for five weeks." Borderline disastrous gaffe that will resurface in the media in days to come...she unwittingly reinforced one of the central skepticisms about her.
October 3, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reality Check:
Biden won because he displayed how knowledgeable and experienced he is on all the major issues that concern the voters.
Palin, on the other hand, once you scrape away all her bloviating and empty blatherskiting about maverick this and maverick; you are left with the conclusion that Sarah Palin can not tell the difference between a carribou's arse, and an ice fishing hole. Of course, what that means, folks, is: you should never swallow what she catches.
October 3, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
That maverick thing just doesn't play when the financial markets are tanking. People want competence.
October 3, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, at least Mark Halperin admits that he graded the debate as a tie because he graded Palin on a curve. How very sexist of him.
October 3, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Unchanged! 0-0=0!
October 3, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama's should have a truly lovely anniversary celebration tomorrow night :)
October 3, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
greg- she may have passed the competence threshold only because there were NO FOLLOW_UPS. Which is why she boldly attacked the msm and the campaign has said she will do no more interviews. she recited talking points like a parrot. She was embarrassing.
October 3, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
The FORMAT was embarrassing for America. THAT was a debate, for cryingoutloud?
Pathetic.
October 3, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I'm proud to be an American
George Carlin's take
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlfKdbWwruY
October 3, 2008 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually it was the "Where's Matt" dancing video...
October 3, 2008 2:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden cleaned her clock.
He's the best debater, hands down, of all four.
October 3, 2008 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
blah blah blah blah blah blah
she is a mess
biden did great, very nice and VERY smart
we need smart now
obama/biden 08
October 3, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the thing: When you observed Joe Biden tonight you saw him as President.
When you observed Sarah Palin tonight, you saw her as a perky city council woman. Every large town has at least one city council woman that could put on the same performance that Sarah Palin did.
And that damn wide front of her tongue thrusting out, was hard to take. She appears to have no tongue tip. It is just one wide slap of meat.
From now on, for me, she shall always be known as Sarah Trout Mouth.
October 3, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like a character in a Richard Brautigan novel.
October 3, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Richard Brautigan mention. All points go to you!
October 3, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
Sarah Trout Mouth. LOLOLOL!!!! You have quite a way with words.
October 3, 2008 1:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden cleaned her clock. He's the best debater, hands down, of all four.
Yes, indeed; notwithstanding his rhetorical skills, Obama is a lousy debate. But Obama and Biden make a GREAT ticket.
October 3, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Halperin admits he graded her on a curve?
For God's sake, people, this is a U.S. presidential election--not junior-high remedial social-studies class!
As someone noted elsewhere, maybe Palin re-energized the GOP base, but Biden sure as hell got me fired up. I was cheering and hollering every time he came through with a great point or comeback... he handled himself really well in a difficult situation and seemed utterly presidential. Palin seemed like a mediocre Alaskan TV personality.
October 3, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yep...Halperin said it on Charlie Rose's show.
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beware of Tom Brokaw. He has run around kissing John McCain's ass. Tonight, after the debate, Brokaw said that the Democrats are very lucky that there is not going to be another VP debate. Brokaw urged the NBC brass to take away the election anchor slots from Olberman and Matthews.
Brokaw is completely in the tank for the republicans. The democrats should try to get him removed from the next debate, and not go on his Sunday morning show.
The way he mumbles his name really should be Tom Brokejaw.
October 3, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
One thing is certain, Biden solidified the Obama/Biden ticket. He made viewers realise that the ticket is more substantive, honest, passionate and respectful.
He gave every voter a greater opportunity to see how they will govern during the next four years. He showed all of us that the ticket is serious. Not kidding around and grandstanding like McCain.
I really dont think she advanced the McCain/Palin ticket any. She pulled herself to the edge of the muck but not from the muck. I do not see the ticket making any significant strides from her performance tonight..
October 3, 2008 1:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm surprised to be the first one to mention the word "tolerant" (in the context of how "tolerant" Palin is of her gay friends) - I found that the word of the evening. I also found that attitude utterly offensive. I am straight but have always had close friends who are gay and consider them among my best friends (as, apparently, does Sarah Palin). However, it never once crossed my mind that I was "tolerating" their choice in partners. I wonder how her gay friends felt when they heard her say that.
October 3, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
She did not say that, but she apparently did a very good job tricking you into thinking she did.
She said that she is tolerant, even though among her friends, her dear friends, there are some who would disagree with it.
I.e., the implication for her base is that she dun know no queers.
October 3, 2008 8:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is like cotton candy. Empty calories. She did not move forward the McCain/Palin team one bit. As a matter of fact, she said some things that could get her into trouble. (i.e. gay civil rights, Israel, tax cuts). I would have liked it if Biden had called her out more but he pounced on McCain. She distorted facts, lied about issues, was juvenile, mocking, insincere, refused to answer questions, and generally came across as scripted and phony.
But the bar was set so low for Palin that anything she would have done would have been perceived as a "win", but I think that as that wears off over the next few days (hours!) and the debate is looked at more critically more people will realize how bad and unsubstantial her performance was.
October 3, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm surprised to be the first one to mention the word "tolerant" (in the context of how "tolerant" Palin is of her gay friends) - I found that the word of the evening. I also found that attitude utterly offensive. I am straight but have always had close friends who are gay and consider them among my best friends (as, apparently, does Sarah Palin). However, it never once crossed my mind that I was "tolerating" their choice in partners. I wonder how her gay friends felt when they heard her say that.
October 3, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dog-whistles from Palin tonight? Here we go....
October 3, 2008 1:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I believe when Sarah uses the word "tolerant" its evangelical code for: be happy we don't stone you to death.
Use of the word acceptance would lose her the Dobson vote. Maybe gain the Haggard, Foley vote, but lose the others...
October 3, 2008 1:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is like eating styrofoam peanuts while watching Hee Haw.
October 3, 2008 1:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
ROTFLMAO!
she's so contrived.
October 3, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is insuffcient space on TPM's servers to describe my hatred of Hee Haw.
The packing peanuts....priceless! I may ha' messed m'self!
October 3, 2008 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Gloom dispair and agony on me
Deep dark depression, excessive misery.
If it weren't for back luck, Id have no luck
at all,
Gloom dispair and agony on me."
October 3, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
And now Ladies and Gentlemen....Mr. Conway Twitty...
RRRRUUUUUUN! HIIIDE! AAAAAAAAAAH!
October 3, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, more of a Merle Haggard and Johnny Cash fan myself.
That little ditty was for Johnny McCrankypants...
October 3, 2008 2:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ok seen most of it and the bottom line this will not change the race in a way Mccain deperately needs.
Biden accomplished exactly what he needed to tonight. He stayed focused, resisted the temptation to light her up and whacked Mccain at every opportunity.
Palin? Well the bar was set so low she couldve stumbled across it. She was ok but again the substance was less filling than a twinkie in a famine.
So Biden set the table for Obama to concentrate on the economy and battle-groudn states and not have to deal with Palinmania. Yes oxygen thief central at redstate and townhall will commence the mass circle jerk but to what end? because Palin proved she can repeat, repeat and flash look at me cute swoons occasionally?
The entire republican party and its core support are sailing a boat down a large river in Eygpt right now. SO short of Palin calling middle class families needy hand out deginerates her victory was assured at approximately 1200 EST 1980 give or take a minute or two.
Meanwhile Mccain is ut of Mich, and he is concentrating on Minn and Wisc? Erm he might want to check the polls....Obama is killing him there as well and PA is fading rapidly. He is literally standing at a leaky Aswan dam with bubble gum wrappers to cover up cracks wider than larry Craig's foot tapping posterior.
October 3, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Brokaw worries me too. Talk about bias! Is he doing the town-hall or the last one?
October 3, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
i ran into brokaw in new york the morning after tim russert died. He seemed to me like a man that his time had past. the same thought comes to me when I think of John McCain. His time came and went. Ronald Reagan is dead and he hasnt been with us for many years. You had a great life, time for you to go back west and ranch. This is no country for old men
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Tena...
Nice birthday present we got tonight from Joe Biden wasn't it? 8-)
October 3, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes it was - Happy Birthday.
I want you to know that we have more company on this board.
This is texasdem's birthday.
October 3, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah I had seen on another thread a few days ago that someone else shared Oct. 2nd as a b-day too Tena. Texasdem? Very cool. I was hoping for some presents and Biden showed up bearing gifts. He speaks as well to Obama's judgment as Palin speaks badly to McSame's...
It was a very good b-day indeed!!!
October 3, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing that can save McCain/Palin is a Terror Alert, followed by martial law and a suspension of elections.
In 3....2....1....
October 3, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
And no more Hurricanes.
October 3, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well I think specificity won ...for a change.
October 3, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin's talking points annoyed be after awhile.
October 3, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
People were complaining about Ifill but in one respect she succeeded: she was basically invisible. There was no Charles Gibson-esque series of follow-ups on an issue to try and nail a candidate to the wall - which makes the debate less informative but also keeps the Republicans from going, "Ya see? Durned bias. Didja know she's writing a book on Obama?"
While we all would've liked to have seen Palin taken to task on a few things, the upshot is that the legitimacy of the debate remained intact. To her credit, Ifill did follow up on Palin's passing remark that the VP could have more power.
October 3, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Gwen Ifill is a terrific journalist (Newshour is the best news program on TV) and she got the job done. The right-wing was already to jump on her and she gave them no reason to do so. I don't think she had anything to do with determining the 2-min. format. She asked fair questions, and a lot of them, and Palin lost--what more do you want?
October 3, 2008 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin's talking points annoyed be after awhile. Her "maverick" line was ANNOYING.
I only remember 2 moments of the debate: Biden speaking about his children being injured and he understands what life is like. Secondly when Biden said that McCain was no maverick.
October 3, 2008 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one who caught Palin struggling to recall Bin Laden's name...she said "That Al Queda Leader"
October 3, 2008 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
She also hooked up the "Shi'a insurgents" and Al Qaeda.
heh.
October 3, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The debate was handled very well by Gwen Ifill. I thought both candidates performed better than expected. Biden won on substance, Palin won on personality, which is what's important to her base.
But, Palin failed the "nuculer" test. I can't take another four years of an elected official mispronouncing the word "nuclear". If you insist on mispronouncing a word, it's either because you're stupid or arrogant, and both are disqualifiers for me.
October 3, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Personality? She's as phony as a damn xeroxed $20.
Personality? I guess if you're a fan of the Dukes of Hazzard.
Jeez. personality my ass - she's poison. She's the kind of woman my mother warned me about. Women hate her.
October 3, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
She can't say "nuclear" because she thinks Nuke!all-clear!
October 3, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ref: "While Biden admittedly wasn't at his best at times during the first half, when the debate drifted onto foreign policy turf, Biden clearly found his footing..."
He was shitty through and through because a 5-week candidate is being "compared" with 36-year Senate vet.
When and what was the turf? I did not see any.
Biden was better, but what's the margin? Was it 95-5? That's the differential number it was supposed to be. A 1-week trained parrot compared easily with with 36-year old vet. That's miserable. Why did Obama pick this guy? For what purpose? To be compared with a moose hunter?
October 3, 2008 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess fogu done changed his avatar and handle. You betcha!
October 3, 2008 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nah...the avatar's not racist enough.
October 3, 2008 8:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is this the return of "Fat David"? I don't remember his handle.
October 3, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, you seem to be a minority of one.
October 3, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
For your own safety please put down the crack pipe and slowly back away from the keyboard...
October 3, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
S Green You've drank the koolaid haven't you
October 3, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Biden was perfect tonight. He actually won the debate and brought some votes to Senator Obama...
PA is a done deal tonight
And the winner of the day is Senator Obama as McWar is conceding Michigan...
October 3, 2008 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did anyone else notice that the Palin clan handed off the newborn to their seven year-old daughter to traipse her around the stage? And she wasn't having an easy time of it. Mom was there, more importantly Dad was there. So were Grandma and Grandpa. It was definitely unsettling. It seemed unusual at the convention, but acceptable since they were sitting down. Very odd.
October 3, 2008 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more and I'm gone - I'm dead tired.
Look, she handles that baby like he is a doll - an accessory and they always hand him off to Willow, the 7 year old. Except they took Bristol, their pregnant 17 year old, out of high school so she can care for Trig while their mom is out vice-presidentin'.
If this isn't Tonya Harding trailer park land - and if they don't look it - well I'm the Queen of Romania.
And the contrast with Joe Biden's family who stayed and talked to Gwen Ifill was amazing.
October 3, 2008 2:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
And thank you all so much for sharing my birfday with me.
It's been lovely - good night.
October 3, 2008 2:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
One last thought for the night. It was a great night for Obama/Biden. The VP debate was littered with potential pitfalls for Biden. There were no missteps on his part and while my expectations were high for him I feel he exceeded them. Palin not imploding is about all that can be said for her. As bad as she has been in the media lately her very uninspired performance at the debate was actually a step up but did nothing to improve the fortunes for the ticket she is on while Biden did for his...
October 3, 2008 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, made my appointment at the VA, made my Donation; not that much ($50) but it means something to me. Let's Go Joe!
October 3, 2008 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
My partner gave $25 tonight, and he really can't give even that much...So I am very proud of him...
October 3, 2008 2:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's all about dignity and competence.
October 3, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
And by the way; What is this, "with the filter of the MSM"?
Her own camp has put her in the Gulag.
Maybe she is complaining about her filter from Crash Mac's depends.
October 3, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
What do you mean by "basic competence bar"? If you care to respond, please cite the "material" over which Palin demonstrated superior "command" than she has in the past. I'm like, y'know, like totallyserious?
Blank.Slate.Nothing.Upstairs.Empty.Vessel.Strictly.Ambition.
October 3, 2008 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
She surpassed the Bush BAR...She spoke in whole sentences. They did not mean competence to run anything.
October 3, 2008 3:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tabula Rasa
October 3, 2008 3:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lacked Dignitas, Gravitas or in Hawaii we would say didn't know Kukai!
October 3, 2008 3:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Happy b-day Tena....
October 3, 2008 2:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin made several misstatements of fact including the claim that Alaska is a huge energy producer when it only produces 3.5% of U.S. energy. She also said Alaska under her leadership accounts for "much progress" towards U.S. energy independence when in fact Alaska's supply under her has gone down. Details of it and other inaccurate things by her are here -
http://dailysource.org/special/palin/216#
October 3, 2008 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
For being such an Energy Czar, as McCain stipulates, she's completely ignorant of the fact the untapped reserves in the US would only satisfy our current appetite for oil for about 18 to 24 months. Once used up, we would have no other choice but to go back to the middle east to sate our thirst for oil.
October 3, 2008 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden left the Mavericks in the Dust!!!!
October 3, 2008 3:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Should have used Mustang instead?
October 3, 2008 3:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
tonight's in-depth analysis from the folks at free republic:
doesn't get much simpler than that, does it?
October 3, 2008 4:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
"John McCain's maverick position that he's in, that's really prompt up to and indicated by the supporters that he has. Look at Lieberman, and Giuliani, and Romney, and Lingle, and all of us who come from such a diverse background of -- of policy and of partisanship, all coming together at this time, recognizing that HE IS THE MAN THAT WE NEED TO LEAVE -- lead..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ0klLngnzY
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/02/debate.transcript/
October 3, 2008 4:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
who is Lingle?
October 3, 2008 4:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
...some dingelberry who backs McCain, I guess.
October 3, 2008 5:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every time that she opens her mouth, I think I'm hearing the weather report on some station in Double Dubuque.
October 3, 2008 5:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are there any bloggers with some video editing skills? Had a good idea take some of Sarahs debate moments, sans voice, and use the song Jive Talkin by the Bee Gees as an overlay.
I think it would be pretty neat, and oh so appropriate.
"Jive Talkin your tellin me lies, yeah Jive Talkin you wear a disguise Jive Talkin so misunderstood, yeah Jive Talkin you just aint no good"
This could work...If they could do it with that Apple 1984 ad...
October 3, 2008 5:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I never heard of Gwen Ifill before last night, but she is a disgrace to her profession. She asked few difficult questions of Palin and didn't follow-up to ask for specifics on any of her canned responses. As a result, Palin actually appeared superficially competent. Thankfully, the American public was smart enough to see through the ruse, it seems.
October 3, 2008 5:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't blame Gwen, please. I do remember hearing her a couple of times reminding both nominees they were straying off subject with their answers.
The McCain campaign rigged the debate in favor of Palin. Gwen's hands were tied. She did the best that one could expect under the rules McCain push on the debate committee.
October 3, 2008 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gwen Ifill moderated the 2004 VP debate.
She hosts the longest running news program on public television.
She has often appeared on MTP.
I could go on...
If you follow politics, how is it possible that you never heard of Gwen Ifill? It's like saying you've never heard of Bob Costas on a sports blog.
October 3, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really?
Gwen Ifill moderated the 2004 VP debate.
She hosts the longest running news program on public television.
She has often appeared on MTP.
I could go on...
If you follow politics, how is it possible that you never heard of Gwen Ifill? It's like going on a Sports Blog and saying you've never heard of Bob Costas.
October 3, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Biden won.
Palin merely made herself marketable again with those on the Rep. base that were starting to run for the hills. And that will soon go down after the fact-checking.
October 3, 2008 6:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK HERE'S MY 2 cents:
Sarah did better than expected, but I seriously doubt it was enough to change much of anything. One 'OK' night in a debate format isn't enough to prove you're knowledgeable and capable enough to be VP or possibly POTUS. I'm sure the base loved her, but not much appeal beyond that as the polls are already dictating.
But I REALLY want the media to latch onto her "dodging" questions by just ignoring the ones she didn't know answers to, by answering something totally unrelated. For that she gets a low grade.
THAT ISSUE ADDRESSED HERE:
http://okwassup.blogspot.com
October 3, 2008 6:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pardon me, but just showing up on stage and being there for the entire debate are not reasonable expectations; they're must-be-dones. Hard to be in a debate if you're not there.
The debate was suppose to be around the questions given and the answers delivered. Palin was playing a game of dodge ball. She never answered questions that showed she understood what was being asked. Instead, she rambled endlessly on talking points that had no bearing on what the question was asking of her.
In short, the strategy the McCain campaign took was for her to employ subtle tactics to turn questions into talking points to energize the base into thinking she was holding her own against Biden.
And that's pathetic!
October 3, 2008 8:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/shorter-debate.html
Thursday, October 02, 2008
Shorter Debate
Part I: Palin did not answer questions directly.
Part II: Biden incredibly strong--pointed out Palin "I heard no plan" on Iraq, very strong on economic and FP issues.
Veep issue devastating against Palin--actually claimed broader powers for VP, clearly without knowing actual constitutional powers. Biden powerful on Cheney--dials way up.
And then...The turning point. The Biden tears. After that, Biden was most clear, passionate and strong, and from there, Palin was gibberish.
Biden win.
Update:
CNN:
National poll of Debate Watchers:
Who won:
Biden: 51%
Palin: 36%
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/shorter-debate.html
October 3, 2008 7:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good morning!
Fist post-debate ad using Biden:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/cantexplain_ad
October 3, 2008 7:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
...or maybe Biden won because he answered the freakin' questions! Why? How? This country is insane - Palin demonstrated that she doesn't even have the barest, surface knowledge of any topic save Alaska and oil production in Alaska and pundits are out analyzing this debate like it was real. It wasn't. What's more to analyze? What is there to analyze when one of the candidates wouldn't even answer a single question the moderator asks?
All Palin proved is that she's remarkably ignorant of ANYTHING outside of Alaskan borders - especially for a politician!
That whole debate should have scared every sentinient being in this country to vote Democratic!
October 3, 2008 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course he won! I thought he missed an opportunity to drive home his “McCain is no (Mavericky) Maverick” by not addressing Palin's assertion that Biden would have been "honored to run with him (John McCain) on the ticket" in the past. He should have driven home the point that the John McCain we have seen in the past few years leading up to this election, is not the John McCain of old (no pun intended, of course).
October 3, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
follow up questions I'd like to hear. Palin supports moving the embassy to Jerusalem. Governer Palin, where is the embassy now? Palin responds to Achilles heel question by listing her strengths. Governor Palin, do you know what an Achilles heel is? Palin consistently refers to Obama as Barack. Governor Palin, you're understandably nervous, but can you recall the last name of the Democratic candidate for president (I think her very unnimble mind lost it and could not get it back)?
October 3, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
It was an interesting debate.
I thought that Joe Biden modified his style to accommodate Sarah's. For instance, he initially focused on Ifill when responding to questions, but then watching how Palin was focusing on the camera, he modified his approach and also focused on the camera. Joe is a quick study.
Also, when Biden picked up on the populist tone of Sarah, he calibrated his own performance to hone in on the "kitchen sink" anecdotes. The most powerful moment in the whole debate was when Biden choked up about his first wife's and daughter's death, and how those moments of struggle made him intimately aware of the struggles of the American people.
That moment will stick with me after this debate. Not the glibness of the Sarah Palin cotton candy performance.
October 3, 2008 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't forget it is filing day for Palin's financial records. Let's hope for something juicy.
Not that anything is needed. Obama and Biden are winning this race keep up whatever it is they are doing.
I like how Obama is doing his debate prep in battleground states. Great way to multitask.
October 3, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hear nice scenery helps when preparing for debates... you know the outdoors-y kind; maybe a nice lake, a beach, shady trees...
October 3, 2008 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
She cleared a basic competence bar? How so?
Take any of her answers: the thinking is muddy, clichéd, and often goes off on a tangent because she can't really answer the question. She spoke in sound bites, she consistently misrepresented herself, McCain and Obama. And she can't think things through because if she believes the VP should have more power than Cheney has arrogated to himself, she's a woman of increcible shallowness. Overall, she sounded stuffed with info and came across as a freshman who had stayed up all night catching up on a semester's worth of material for the oral exam.
This is not competence, this is incoherence masked by cute mannerisms and faux folksiness.
October 3, 2008 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Totally agree.
The only competence she displayed is the ability to learn her lines for scripted responses. Right up there with what Strasbourg Geese demonstrate when they're forcefed to provide foie gras.
The way she mangles grammar clearly indicates that she has no real idea of the meaning behind the words she recites.
October 3, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wish Biden had taken that "wave the white flag of defeat" and thrown it back at Palin/McCain by telling her that, by even saying that, she was implying that our troops returning under Obama's and Maliki's timetable would be returning in disgrace.
But I thought Biden was masterful. Who would have thought that the emotional moment of the debate would be from Biden, not Pricess Wasilla?
PEACE
October 3, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I loved the little pretzel Biden twisted Palin into over abortion - so easy... Poor Biden. I feel for the guy. If he had used even 2~3% of his intellect, he'd have been crucified for beating up on Palin.
Probably had his brain all warmed-up, stretched out and ready for a fight only to have to bench it for most of the game...(sigh)
October 3, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
two things came to my mind. The first was image over content for Palin. It was her winking and forced folksiness combined with talking point answers. It was George Bush 2000 all over again and the right wingers still buy into it. The bar is so low for capability its frightening.
The second was an image of the Verizon Network commercial. When only 4 months ago Palin didn't know what the VP does and now she wants to expand the power of the office shows me the Cheney network is briefing her and standing behind the curtain.
Run away.....
October 3, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're totally right.
But the fact is, the VP debate wasn't the train wreck or NASCAR pile up most people were predicting. And while Biden was great, the big story of the debate seems is, "Palin didn't screw up".
Sure, she might have dodged every question put to her and reverted to talking points, but like it or not that was smart strategy, given her apparent mental faculties....
Interesting clip here shows a media coach talking about the debate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4vDcnAahAk
He describes Palin's "bridging" - seamlessly jumping from the question to the rehearsed talking points.
We've all seen it and it's frustrating but works for most viewers!
There must have been some heavy coaching this week!
Anyway - it allowed Palin to survive and shine (depending on who you ask) as the folksy, fundie, hockey/soccer/whatever mom that the right love to love.
October 3, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wasn't paying attention and I didn't realize there was a "no follow up" rule for the moderator. But it explains a lot.
I think that McCain/Palin took advantage of this rule to game the system. What we saw wasn't a debate, but a series of mini-speeches that Palin rehearsed beforehand.
For example, McCain/Palin aides create a mini-speech regarding nuclear weapons. The idea is simple ... get a question on nuclear weapons ... and just recite the mini-speech. Put in enough platitudes and waving flag statements, and it sounds like she's actually listened to the question and thought of an answer ... when, in fact, she's just reciting a canned answer. With no follow ups allowed you're home free.
Two giveaways on this ... first she didn't get confused about the Achilles heal question ... it's just that McCain/Palin didn't anticipate this question and they gave her a canned "I don't know what category this falls into" answer. Second, Palin never took even a fraction of a second before answering to actually consider what she was going to say.
October 3, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone noticed that when Sarah was asked to describe her own Achilles Heel, she described her greatest strength?
...almost as if she really does not know what an Achilles Heel is?
Is it possible that, in this day and age, she has never encountered the term? Not even in a Disney movie?
October 3, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Biden certainly did win, because he made a forceful case against McCain, but also simply because he answered the questions. Tonight, Palin applied for a job with us, the American people. Can you imagine if a job applicant in her first employment interview refused to answer the questions asked of her but instead chose to answer entirely different (unasked) questions of her own choosing? By such an arrogant and self-serving approach to the debate, she simply proved (and hopefully reminded the viewing audience) how alike she and Bush are. Can't you imagine him pulling the same stunt?
Even though it was an extremely difficult situation that didn't play to Biden's natural strengths as a debater, as he couldn't be seen to be going after Palin too much, he did an excellent job. It would have been so easy to slip up, but he hit all the right notes; his performance surely showed that he really does have tremendous discipline. I was so proud of him. Thank you, Joe!
October 3, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agree fully with HTX-- Palin will not be back. she got here via the Mavrickiness, who will also not be back. Do not think that the public voice of YAY, SARAH is what conservatives say in private about their candidates. McCain had the choice to pick his veep, he did so, to the detriment of the entire party and they will not forget. Once the spotlight is turned off, the smiles go away.
In the next several years, she will go back to Alaska and try to rebuild her political mini-empire, though not because she wants to. She is absolutely loving the celebrity factor of a national spotlight. I believe that the Campaign folks tried to get her to quit in private (some medical malady for one of the clan, perhaps), but she has refused and so the charade continues.
However, her historical footnote will be that she once tried to "go for it" in DC, before she was impeached and put in jail for abuse of power in Anchorage. This will be more and more interesting to watch after the elections get over.
October 3, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: "Mavericks"--The last thing the GOP wants are contrarians. Stand together, vote together, mostly as their leadership dictates. One was one too many, even in fiction.
Also, look up the word. I grew up in the West, and to quote a fun movie, "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
In its original meaning, a maverick refers to an unbranded calf on open range (usually a lost calf with no cow). The important thing to know about a maverick is that it belongs to whomever brands it first! So how's that for a stamp? Wonder who branded John first? Look no further than K Street. He is, by his own definition, owned.
October 3, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I am late here today, I am surprised by some of the reactions. Know this much: you absolutely do not want Palin to quit now. That would create a honeymoon period for a replacement that would put them arching high during the vote!
This was best played to allow her and her supporters to think she did well enough by not embarrassing herself and run screaming from the stage. Good TV, bad strategy. Biden was nice, respectful, and allowed the country to get their Palin fill. I am sure that while quietly holding back the dry heaves, was joyous in her goofiness. It also helped that he was fantastic in the actual debate.
Let her think she was a huge hit! And keep doing it right up until the election. This will keep McCain having to cover for her contradictions, answer for her lack of quals, and she will be the millstone around his neck. Maybe it will even force McCain to put her out for interviews now. No excuses anymore, right? In her last two public appearances she has said she wants more hard questions. Have at it.
The only day that really matters is in November. The "slow grind" of exposure will do the job and it will be too late to switch. A knock-out punch last night would only set up her replacement. The rumors of VP-vetting were everywhere, so McCain's handlers were already halfway down the road before the debate ever happened. This was the best possible outcome. I am surprised this has not been discussed here more.
October 3, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Biden won walking away -- beginning at latest at about 20 minutes into the debate.
Unless we were judging on spunky ability to deliver and repeat over an over again the latest McSame advertising jingle.
Should be a slight up-tick in the already-underwhelming demand for Sarah Palin ringtones. Except in Michigan.
October 3, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought before the dabate that if Palin didn't hit a home run that Obama would get about a two point bounce from the VP debate.
I'm sticking with that number.
October 3, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink