« New Polls Show Tight Race In Key Swing States | Home | Conservative Group To Run Anti-Wright Ads On National Networks Through Election Day »

Al Qaeda Leader Calls For Humiliation Of Republicans -- Trying To Help McCain Win?

Everyone has wanted to know when or whether Al Qaeda would try to swing the Presidential election. Well, we now may have our answer:

An al Qaeda leader has called for President George W. Bush and the Republicans to be "humiliated", without endorsing any party in the upcoming U.S. presidential election, according to a video posted on the Internet.

"O God, humiliate Bush and his party, O Lord of the Worlds, degrade and defy him," Abu Yahya al-Libi said at the end of sermon marking the Muslim feast of Eid al-Fitr, in a video posted on the Internet.

Libi, one of the top al Qaeda commanders believed to be living in Afghanistan or Pakistan, called for God's wrath to be brought against Bush equating him with past tyrants in history.

Hmmm. Looks like McCain didn't get the coveted Bin Laden boost yet, so for now he'll have to settle for this far more obscure figure.

Seriously, if the Repubs grab on to this, as seems likely, there's plenty of material for Dems to be ready with push-back. There's plenty of evidence, from people who know what they're taking about, that Al Qaeda prefers pro-war Republican rule in America and that saying such stuff could be designed to help McCain win.

Remember that journalist Ron Suskind reported that CIA analysts concluded that Bin Laden had released a tape of himself on the eve of the 2004 election in order to help Bush stay in power, partly because his presidency made such a handy recruiting tool.

Even better, counter-terrorism expert Richard Clarke recently surmised that Al Qaeda might try to swing the election to McCain, perhaps with a terror attack, or with some kind of videotaped remarks. Looks like one Al Qaeda leader may now be proving Clarke right.

Late Update: I forgot the best part -- the other day the news broke that Al Qaeda supporters on Websites affilitated with the group said they were actively pulling for McCain to win.


82 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

The Dems just have to say that Al Qaeda endorses McCain.

user-pic

I know that it's conventional wisdom that the bin Laden tape surfacing 5 days before the election helped swing it in Bush's direction, but when I look at the polling numbers from RealClearPolitics, it's not clear at all that that tape had any effect.

As for this tape? Who knows? It's listed in red on Drudge, but there's no huge blaring headline or siren, which tells me even Drudge must suspect that it's not going to do much.

user-pic


Goddamn it - if we're going to pay attention to Al Qaeda every time we have a fucking election then just register the motherfuckers to vote and get it over with.

I'm sick of terrorists having an effect on the outcome of our elections.

user-pic

Ha ha! I'll be the GOP will claim ACORN already got them registered in Nevada.

user-pic

They only have an effect because the Republicans use them. It's so weird that 'terrorists' is a word that they claim to hate so much, but is word that let them gain so much power after 9/11. It's like a drug user who claims to both hate and love heroin.

user-pic

ACORN submitted about 5 voter registration forms for the Number 2 al Qaida leader.....

user-pic

HAHAHA!! Not only did Joe The Plumber NOT show up at McCain's "rally" in Ohio today, 4,000 of the 6,000 in attendance were school kids bused in to fill the empty spaces.

CRINGE - OUCH!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/30/mccain-camp-busses-in-sch_n_139300.html

user-pic

It's like a field trip to a museum. But then the trip gets scary because one of the mummies is talking in front of a microphone...

user-pic

4000 traumatized children.
(They were told they would see Bob the Builder, but instead met Tito the Jackson)

user-pic

The Obama Campaign is already flipping to the tab in the Contingency Binder for their response when the McCain Camp goes batshit on this.


John

user-pic

Yup! The Obama campaign team has got to be the coolest, most level-headed, "we've anticipated that" political team of all time. Just think how the Obama administration will handle emergencies - cool, calm, collected.

The only team I remember being nearly as good as this team is the San Francisco 49ers when they played Miami at Stanford Stadium in the 1985 Superbowl. Bill Walsh calling the plays, Joe Montana at QB, and Ronnie Lott as Minister of Defense. A joy to watch!!! So will be the Barack Obama/Joe Biden administration!!!

VOTE

user-pic

Cosign, both you and John.

user-pic

And don't forget the McCain campaign's reasoning after the al-Qaeda message board semi-endorsement

" 'Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election,' said a commentary posted Monday on the extremist Web site al-Hesbah, which is closely linked to the terrorist group. It said the Arizona Republican would continue the 'failing march of his predecessor,' President Bush."

They said that they were trying reverse-psychology. So then the question is, what is this? More reverse psychology? The fact that this "denouncement" of the Republicans is public while the announcement of "support" was on a password-protected site might be a point of argument that they would, in fact, rather have a Republican in office. Denounce publically just like they did with Bush, but say privately that they'd prefer McCain win.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/21/AR2008102102477.html?hpid=topnews

user-pic
They said that they were trying reverse-psychology.

Yeah, but how many layers?  Head-fake?  Double head-fake?  Double reverse?

user-pic

So, is this for real or is this one of their reverse psychology endorsements? I'm sure the McCain camp will let us know which one it is.

user-pic

It's reverse if it hurts McCain, straight-forward if it helps McCain. That's the only rule.

user-pic

What are the chances this somehow coincides with Palin's meeting with nat. sec. advisors today (with scheduled press statement afterwards)?
http://thepage.time.com/2008/10/30/palin-talks-national-security-with-advisers/

user-pic

I'm so confused. First, al Qaeda endorses McCain. Now, it wants him humiliated... OH, WAIT, that's right... I don't give a sh-t what a bunch of fricking terrorists want me to do with my democracy!?!? So glad I just all of a sudden remembered that!

user-pic

I'll explain it. The endorsement for McCain "and you should read the endorsement too, it's devastating" comes from an Al Qaeda member on a pw protected website that wasn't intended for as a public bulletin for consumption. The endorsement of the the destruction of the republican party was a public endorsement by an Al Qaeda LEADER meant for public consumption.

The endorsement of McCain from the Qaeda member came about a week ago, while the endorsement from the LEADER came a day or two ago.

What I don't understand is why the Obama campaign hasn't preempted any possible message from Bin Laden by cutting an ad of the Al Qaeda member's devastating endorsement of McCain? Perhaps they have one ready in case Bin Laden makes a video, but still, if Bin Laden's smart, he will do it 3 days before the election this time (so SNL can't do a parody like in '04 which somewhat offset his message) where any Obama response might be minimized. Or maybe Obama is waiting to spring the ad a day or two before they EXPECT Bin Laden might try and sway the election to take up a news cycle and maximize the preemption. I hope the latter is the case.

user-pic

What's interesting here isn't the resurfacing of Al Qaeda into our elections. It's that instead of endorsing a candidate, they're endorsing a party. The Republican party is in line for historically humiliating defeats this year. And in swoops the Al Qaeda endorsement to say, "Yes America, this is exactly what we WANT you to do. Really..."

Never let it be said that these guys are dumb. They know which party ensures their continued survival and boosts their recruitment.

user-pic

The ONE thing McCain's camp has been waiting for...the Al Qaida tape! That is, if they didn't give up waiting for the real thing and just made their own tape in someone's backyard somewhere in Arizona.

user-pic

Any doubts McCain will spin this in his favor?

Victory for Obama/Democrats victory for the terrorists crap.

That Mofo would sell his 100 yr old mother butcher in Baghdad, if that's what it takes to win this election.

By the way, looking at the polls, it looks like his relentless negative sleaze campain may be gaining traction.

user-pic

Which polls?

I ask because when I look at the national tracking polls like, say, Rasmussen, that every one was freaking out and gnashing their teeth over yesterday, Obama's lead increased to 5 today. When I look at the Gallup tracking poll of traditional voters (which created much dismay as well), his lead has widened to five. In Zogby, to 7. HotDog? Who knows? Drudge is no longer posting the gap.

If you're looking at the Fox poll, well, as has been commented on ad nauseum, there are some bizarre party numbers in that poll.

I'm not saying that the relentless negative campaign hasn't had an effect, though. Obama's favorability ratings (tracked by RCP) keep going up.


user-pic

Does anyone even know when this video was made? The Reuters piece doesn't say. For all we know, it could have been from two years ago.

user-pic

CT - I truly believe that Bush/Rove/Cheney have an entire library of this bullshit.

I believe that - they just pull this shit out when they think the time is right.

I'm telling y'all I really believe that bin Laden is a "silent partner" in the Bush/Cheney organization.

user-pic

Al Qaeda certainly has been good for Bush.

user-pic

The Bush and bin Laden families have been in business together for over 35 years.

I am not a conspiracy freak - I really am not. But I really do believe that they are in this together and I have for one hell of a long time.

user-pic
Late Update: I forgot the best part -- the other day the news broke that Al Qaeda supporters on Websites affilitated with the group said they were actively pulling for McCain to win.

HA!

user-pic

Excellent point. And considering Bush just tried to get his DOJ to upend the Ohio voting and was rebuffed, the timing of this is especially...interesting.

user-pic

Oops. I missed this:

sermon marking the Muslim feast of Eid al-Fitr,
which, thanks to teh google, I learned is the feat marking the end of Ramadan.

Teh Tubez were similarly generous in telling me that the end of Ramadan was October 1st.

user-pic

This tape is about a month old. someone has been holding it until ......NOW.

duh.......

these tactics are truly disgusting, and I hope the Obama campaign points out exactly what CT pointed out!!!!

blaegh.

user-pic

I mean....That Mofo would sell his 100 yr old mother to a butcher in Baghdad, if that's what it takes to win this election...I'm pissed.

Also, why does it feel like I'm on a rightwing nutjob website in the last 1day?

Extremely lame, intellectually bankrupt analysis of Obama's speech, cherry picking the polls to show McCain closing the gap and lame fuck headlines on the front page like "Qaida Leader: 'O God, Humiliate Bush And His Party'"

Are you just becoming giant concern trolls or did TPM shift political ID?

user-pic

Um, I'm about half way there with you, Kash.

Sometimes the attempt to be "fair" looks a tad strange.

But we had this discussion on the last thread, so I guess I'll quit talking about it.

user-pic

I'm as harsh a critic of the bloggers as any (especially the poll reporting around here), but even I don't think TPM has gone Republican. This is a legitimate story to report on, to me. The name of the site is Talking Points Memo, and you can be sure this story will make it into McCain's talking points pretty soon.

user-pic

Don't you get what I meant?

Geez, why the hell are you taking literally.

user-pic

"cherry picking the polls". You know, that's pretty rich, coming from someone who just opined upthread that McCain's relentless sleaze seems to be "gaining traction", according to "the polls".

user-pic

We can all differ on our reactions to the posts. However, if I may, let me just say that there really isn't anything wrong with criticizing the blogger.

Blogger worship is sick-making and it's everywhere online. You go to Eschaton and take issue with something Atrios has posted - even mildly. See what happens - you will be torn to pieces.

I think that's wack.

user-pic

I don't understand this comment at all. I can't take exception to something Kash just wrote? Huh?

user-pic

No you can - I'm putting my two cents worth in on this - I"m not criticizing you, CT. Just remarking.

user-pic

Saw that a few years backs myself. Got to the point were it was a cackle of the few not of the many.

user-pic

I'm sorry I saw Eric's special thread from Marist and Fox polls first. Then after posting the above comment I saw the CNN poll...

Anyway, I'd rather prefer Eric give a detail analysis or none at all.

user-pic

Sometimes I wonder if Republicans aren't allies with Al Qaida which explains why we haven't gone after them for the 9/11 attack. This statement is suspiciously too convenient for the Republican party. I can actually visualize Rove calling over there and saying, "release the statement." That man would make a deal with the devil to keep Republicans in power, and to keep the myth of his genius alive.
Now is when the choice of Biden as the VP candidate becomes important. Obama is ready for this.

user-pic

I'm not a conspiracy theorist but it's also clear that each of them serves an incredibly useful purpose for the other. Bush needed the fear of al Qaeda to ram through his agenda, and al Qaeda needed Bush to help them recruit terrorists. I don't think Rove's on the phone to them or anything, but it's clearly a symbiotic relationship.

And, yes, Biden should be out front on this now.

user-pic

Thank you.

If this isn't an interdependent relationship I don't know what is.

Please give me a very big fucking break -

user-pic

Let's see, does the following describe AQ or the Republican party?

Rigid religious beliefs
Women are inferior
Only the religious have the right to rule

Hmmmm

user-pic

Is this a trick question?

user-pic

It's symbiotic.
The Republicans have helped AQ gain support and AQ have helped keep GW in power!

user-pic

I know. I was joking.

user-pic

I'm currently at work and don't have access to a tv...someone just called to tell me McCain is already talking about this Al Qaida "endorsement" in his speeches in Ohio today. One of the cable networks just showed it.

user-pic

There's nothing on CNN, FoxNews, CBSNews, or NBCNews (web sites) so far.

Nothing on ThePage, either.

user-pic

To top it off, Obama has now linked to Saddam (via Rezko of course):

http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5996

user-pic

I've always questioned the authenticity and the time relevance of the Bin Laden videos and those alleged to come from Al Qaeda.

According to the Reuters article, these comments were referring, "albeit indirectly", to the U.S. elections.

Whenever these video or audio recordings come out, there are always these little disclaimers, or non-specific dates, sometimes complete mistranslations.

Remember that video in January of Iranian speedboats vowing to "blow up" an approaching U.S. Navy destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz?

The one they ucharacteristically released to the American public via NYT and other media outlets?

It was not authentic after all.

user-pic


Exactly.

It's too fucking convenient for words that these damn tapes show up at just about this point in the last two presidential elections.

Who is kidding whom?

user-pic

This is easy. When some al-Qaeda site said they prefer McCain to win the McCain campaign said it was reverse psychology. They pretty much can't attack on this, or else they essentially say that al-Qaeda actually wants THEM to win.

user-pic

Right, because intellectual consistency has been a hallmark of the modern Republican party.

user-pic

Obama and his camp have gamed this moment out in advance in a million different ways. They will have a pitch perfect response.

Obama will do his part. It's up to us to do ours. GOTV. GOTV. GOTV.

user-pic

Al Qaeda are sick, crazy and, yes, evil, but they're not stupid. They know there will be a backlash in the U.S. against anything they say. So what they are doing is transparently obvious: trying to help McShame. And it's equally obvious why they'd want him to win -- because, like Bush, he'd be the best recruiter they could possibly have.

They are also trying to show they're relevant and can impact a U.S. election.

I don't believe that this year American voters will fall for this bullshit, but that's what they're trying to do.

user-pic

I gotta hope that we're done with puppeteers (Osama and Bush) pulling strings at our elections. Fuck 'em.

user-pic

You and me both.

Anyone in this country who pays the slightest bit of attention to what someone is telling us AlfuckingQaida wants us to do or not do is fucking insane.


user-pic

I don't know. I consider this election to be bigger than Obama. It's a referendum on the status quo, the false balance of power between us, the freaking USA, and a small band of uneducated idiots who have figured out how to frighten people.

user-pic

It seems like an Obama victory would take the wind out of Al Qaeda's sails to a large degree.

Is Joe the Terrorist going to attack a country, who just elected a man who's middle name is Hussein?

Maybe but there's a good chance that Obama will be an antidote to the "Death to America" types.

user-pic

The best thing to do about AQ msg's is ignore them, find who made them, then kill/capture that guy.

user-pic

As it turns out, Abu Yahya al-Libi is not fake-Arabic for "Abu the Ya-ya Liberal", but is a real person. The Wikipedia entry on al-Libi includes a list of the dozens of videos he has put out, averaging about one per month of the past few years. Chances are, the tapes legit. When they show up in Drudge first, that's highly suspect, but Reuters is a reputable news source. Usually these videos are released to al-Jazeera, the Middle Eastern news source, but I find no mention of it there.

user-pic

link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Yahia_al-Libi

ps - why doesn't Greg's link connect to the actual story? I can't find it at Reuters.

user-pic

No doubt Reuters is in a different league of credibility than Drudge.

But the newswires, including AP, have been used as propaganda channels, perhaps more transparently over the last eight years.

The networks are credible but then, the Pentagon successfully deployed a legion of generals to talk up the Iraq war.

I don't underestimate the danger of some of these Al Qaeda leaders.

But I also don't underestimate the danger of some of our own leaders.

user-pic

BTW... hasn't Bush humiliated himself enough? And isn't McCain about 95% of the way to humiliating himself as much as Shrub has, but without the bonus of having stolen a pair of Presidential elections? It's not like AQ needs to call for *more* humiliation. It's overkill at this point. ;)


John

user-pic

Good point.

Mr. Tena called a little while ago and I was whining about the polls and he said with great amusement in his voice: will you stop that - McLame is behind everywhere, Obama is ahead in every state he needs and he is doing fine. It's ok.

And he's right.

user-pic

As a muslim, I can tell you that the Eid of Fitr was on 09/30/08. What were they waiting to release the tape?

It won't stick. Not this time, not this year!!!

user-pic

Even though I don't think we should put any credibility in Fox's polls a few days before the election, I am also freaking out a little. I appreciate Mr. Tena's assurance. :)

user-pic

What are the chances this somehow coincides with Palin's meeting with national security advisors today (with scheduled press statement afterwards)?

user-pic

This tape should be played as a reminder that bin Laden is still out there and 7 years of Repubicans' hunting him has gone nowhere.

user-pic

"degrade and defy him"

That can be taken many ways.

user-pic

Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are important political tools in the repug bag of tricks. As long as anything they say can instill fear, it moves people to believe repugs are the only one's capable of handling their threat, they serve their purpose.

Keep in mind, as long as they can make idle threats without the necessary means to carry them out, but get us to jump thru hoops at imaginary scenarios that might occur but are never mentioned, we victimize ourselves for no cause or reason.

The problem is not Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. It's what was famously once said in the Pogo comic strip...We've met the enemy and he is us.

user-pic

Damn, McCain doesn't even rate getting his Al Qaeda reverse psychology boost from OBL. Osama pushed it off onto one of his flunkies. Now that's humiliating.

And don't give me that "Bin Laden couldn't do it himself 'cause he's dead" crap. So what if he's dead? It didn't stop Strom Thurman from carrying a full Senate load, so I don't see why it would stop Bin Laden from making videos.

user-pic

The correct response, should Obama feel compelled to respond, is that he isn't going to psycho-analyze Al Qaeda and neither should John McCain.

We don't have parse their words, we already know their intentions.

They are the enemy to the United States, regardless of the party in the White House, and deserve no voice in our election or our policy making.

user-pic

That should definitely be the point.

user-pic

The video message translated: Oh God, please help Bush's party and, if possible, also Bush himself, stay in power. They are such easy targets.

user-pic

Al Qaeda the flipfloppers. A week ago they gave a full throttle endorsement to Johnny Mac & Sarah Sleigh Ride. They want another nutjob to drive the USS U.S. They want John. These terrorists need some message discipline.

user-pic

Hello all. I'm a lurker who seldom posts. I think one aspect of AQ's motives have been missed in the discussion. It is patently clear that they intend this to help the Republicans. But I think the motive is more complex than simple "recruitment." OBL has more sophisticated understanding of economics than many seem willing credit him with. He was a successful international construction magnate, a multi-millionaire, and has some understanding of international finance.

He has said repeatedly that one of his main goals is so weaken the US economy that it is unable to interfere in the Islamic world. He saw the devastating economic impact of the Soviet-Afghan war; indeed he credits that for the collapse of the Soviet Union a few years later. I think he wants the Republicans to win because he believes that continuing their economic and political policies will lead to a more rapid collapse of the US economic strength and thereby diminish its military strength as well.

I could be wrong. But I think AQ's reasoning is more complex than bleeding us Iraq and enriching their recruitment. Those are fringe benefits. He's a twisted motherfucker, but OBL thinks strategically.

user-pic

Hello all. I'm a lurker who seldom posts. I think one aspect of AQ's motives have been missed in the discussion. It is patently clear that they intend this to help the Republicans. But I think the motive is more complex than simple "recruitment." OBL has more sophisticated understanding of economics than many seem willing credit him with. He was a successful international construction magnate, a multi-millionaire, and has some understanding of international finance.

He has said repeatedly that one of his main goals is so weaken the US economy that it is unable to interfere in the Islamic world. He saw the devastating economic impact of the Soviet-Afghan war; indeed he credits that for the collapse of the Soviet Union a few years later. I think he wants the Republicans to win because he believes that continuing their economic and political policies will lead to a more rapid collapse of the US economic strength and thereby diminish its military strength as well.

I could be wrong. But I think AQ's reasoning is more complex than bleeding us Iraq and enriching their recruitment. Those are fringe benefits. He's a twisted motherfucker, but OBL thinks strategically.

user-pic

Sorry about the double post. I got a message that said the server wasn't responding so I tried it again.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address