« A Day At The Congressional Races | Home | Obama Keeps Hitting McCain On The Economy »

Yet Another Poll Puts McCain Up In Ohio

A seventh consecutive poll has John McCain with a lead in the key swing state of Ohio, a consistent finding that can only lead one to believe he really is ahead here.

The new numbers from Public Policy Polling (D): McCain 48%, Obama 44%, with a ±3% margin of error.

The key grab from the pollster's analysis: "There is a troubling trend for Barack Obama of undecided white voters in many of the swing states moving into John McCain's camp. He's going to be in trouble if he can't get that turning back in the other direction."


92 Comments

| Leave a comment

I'm not surprised about Ohio. Lot's of racism. I disagree about the undecided white voters in all swing states going to John McCain though. See Colorado for example.

As long as Obama holds the Kerry states+IA,NM,CO he will win.

Appalachia again...

Not to worry. All of the polls are now showing momentum in Obama's favor. McBush's bounce is now over and Palin's shine is now tanished beyond repair.

And none of these polls were taken before EVERYONE called McBush out for blatant lying sleazy campaigning. That alone is worth about 5%.

It is sad really considering that OH might be the state that has been hurt the most by Bush's economic policies and yet voters want to follow it up with another 4 years of the same. I don't get it.

user-pic

Undecided white Ohio voter = Democrat who won't vote for black guy but are to chickenshit to admit it!

user-pic

Sadly, yes.

Hmm interesting especially as a poll from this same pollster will show (come sout tomorrow Taegan has story) Obama trending upwards and in the lead in Virginia. How can he be in trouble if Mccain loses virginia? Additionally another poll from ARG (yeh shaky track record for those bubbas) shows Obama back up in New Mex by 7. Colorado, Iowa, New Mex, Virginia? Suddenly Ohio doesnt seem as relevant anymore if and I know it is a big if Obama can hold Mich, PA, Minn and Mich then how undecideds trend in Ohio wont mean squat.

Agreed. Obama can win without Ohio. McCain can't win without Virginia.

Key question for strategy: are these independents chosing a candidate "who tells less lies" or a candidate who shows whatever qualities they look for in a president?

Do you live in Ohio? I worked there, and the racism is astounding, especially in the Southeastern part of the state.

user-pic

I grew up in Western Pa, and as we used to say, it's the same difference.

Yes, racism is astounding. So is economic dislocation. When you have to balance the two things against each other all in one vote, you have some kind of unpredictable election.

One of the things that has occurred to me more and more is that these voters truly haven't let go of the past. They keep pining for that old secure manufacturing base job, the one that didn't require them to have a boss who was African American or a different country like Japan.

user-pic

Yep, I worked briefly in NW PA after graduating from college in the late 70s, and I was astonished at how backward racial attitudes were there compared to where I grew up (in central Virginia).

James Carville was right when he described Pennsylvania by saying "You've got Pittsburgh at one end and Philadelphia at the other, and in between is Alabama."

user-pic

I grew up in SW Ohio and racism is a factor in rural Ohio, not unlike Southern Illinois or most of Indiana, rural PA. Ohio is not unique in having many working class whites who will not vote for an A-A candidate.

Obama can win Ohio, but it needs to be weighted against campaigning in Colorado, Nevada, Virginia etc.

user-pic

A friend of mine calls rural Pennsylvania "Pennsyltucky"

And a lot of people in Ohio call Cincinnati, "Cincitucky."
Racism runs deep in southern Ohio, but you know sometyhing, I think we can overcome the bigot vote.

I stand by my prediciton that Obama wins Ohio.

Wouldn't honesty be a quality you would want in a President? Especially given the current Administration's tortured relationship to the truth, and how that has played out over the last 8 years.

I agree. I think "tells less lies" is exactly a quality an independent would look for in President.

Lalo, I would go for a President who can manage both at the same time.

But who knows what the swing vote thinks. Or if.

Sometimes you have to put things in perspective to appreciate the, er, finer details of the analysis:

Indie McSwing: "I am voting for John McCain because he is going to give me a bigger tax cut."

Swing O'Indy: "Well, John McCain was actually lying about that. Obama's tax cut for you is $600 more than McCain's."

Indie McSwing: "Oh, I do not really care about who lies, they all lie. John McCain is going to give me a bigger tax cut."

Really? Is that how it works?

user-pic

Unfortunately, you seem to have the thought process down to a "T". :-(

As God is my witness, I had that exact conversation with a secretary in my office.

user-pic

The "quality" they look for is white male.

They are pining for a past which wasn't what they imagine, and cannot be the present or future.

Exactly. And I don't believe a damn thing will change a racist to vote for Obama. He could offer them the moon and they would vote "white", sadly.

user-pic

Maybe I'm just looking for silver linings, but Chuck Todd said this morning that all of these close swing state polls should be taken with a grain of salt because the Dems have run up huge numbers of new voters that may not show up in these polls. Also, Democratic votes in Ohio's cities in the last two elections have over-performed and may be even stronger this time with a motivated African American vote. Todd said that if Obama can shift rural counties from 70-30 McCain to 65-35 McCain, he should win the state. But, McCain does consistently poll ahead of Obama, so I guess we'll see.

And it's a "likely voter" poll.

user-pic

Let's not forget the cell phone generation who don't necessarily have land lines for pollsters to call.

I worked in Ohio on a congressional race in 2004, and stayed in Canton. Let me tell you, Ohio is full of dumbfucks. I'd be happy to see it go red because that state isn't worth our money and effort.

Ohio is one giant confused state. 33% is appalachia, 33% is midwest, 33% is east coast. It's like herding cats there. It gets hotter than hell in the summer, and damn cold in the winter. The state is so confused. Some of the most fickle people I have met in my life have been Ohioans. Mix that with a propensity for voting republican and you can see that they are a clueless group that can't make up it's mind. Now this year, you throw in a senior citizen and a black man and now we have really thrown a wrench in things.

Go elsewhere, they will vote how they vote.

user-pic

If that's your attitude, please spare Ohioans the pleasures of your campaigning efforts.

People know what you think about them, and your quite likely an ineffective advocate for the causes you support.

Besides, Obama's strategy is to involve locals, thank god.

user-pic

Yes, I think it's safe to say that McCain is up in Ohio.

Guess I'll just have to make more phone calls.

Wonder if Ohio voters feel that the "fundamentals of the economy are strong"?

Bush-McCain, 08.

Caveat to Virginia referrence Ras a repub leaning poll has them tied, survey USA has Obama up 4 and now PPP yeh a dem poll is showing a good lead there also. That is a trend and is starting to pick up steam.

user-pic

Former Virginia governor Linwood Holton, the state's first Republican governor since Reconstruction, has come out in support for Obama. Of course, his son-in-law is current Democratic Governor Tim Kaine, who was an Obama supporter early on. ;-)

But having Holton in the Obama camp should help pull some Virginia moderates into the Obama column.

a consistent finding that can only lead one to believe he really is ahead here.
Indeed. We're still quite a ways away from Nov 4 but, in terms of areas to work on, OH can definitely use some TLC. I'm hopeful but skeptical about the supposed underestimation of the "New Registered Voters" who, from my understanding don't show up in "likely voter" tabulations but are in "Registered voter tabulations". Will they turn out? We had an unpopular war last cycle and they didn't show up all that much. Maybe they will this time.

Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton. He can convince these voters that their lives and livelihoods are at stake in this election, black President be damned. Obama and Clinton need to make a swing through southern Ohio and up the eastern border into Youngstown, Canton, and Akron. Have Obama deliver his stump speech then have Clinton come out and vouch for him, or vice versa. The purely visceral visual of Obama next to Clinton will assuage a lot of fears and remind people that the 90s were gravy compared to now. Obama can still win Ohio, I think, but he's got to actually make a play for it and stop going to just Columbus and Cleveland and actually get out there on the ground.

This is an EXCELLENT suggestion, and I think the one possibility that might help.

Billy and Amelie:
Agree 100% on Bill Clinton. Chuck Todd had some harsh analysis on Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan which Todd believes are a toss-up now and trending towards McCain.

JOe

Why is this so surprising? Obama lost the OH primary by a 9 point margin. If he couldn't muster a majority of voters in a party primary, what makes you think he can get a majority of votes in the general election?

user-pic

Well, by this stupid reasoning, BK, Obama should be behind in California, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts...

Primaries to the G.E. = apples to oranges.

But you're forgiven for being as thickheaded as the political pundits who keep telling us Obama has a Hispanic problem because Clinton won more Hispanic votes than Obama.

Comparing California, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts to Ohio == apples to oranges.

These states are all safe democratic states. It doesn't matter who's on those tickets, generic democrat wins these states hands down. (With the exception of NJ which is trending GOP).

Ohio on the other hand, is a republican state having voted GOP 3 out of the last 10 elections.

In the eyes of democratic OH voters, Obama was the second best candidate.

Your not going to change the status quo in that state with a candidate who came in second place by 9 pts.

user-pic

Comparing primaries to the general election is apples to oranges, no matter how much you want to blather on about safe Democratic states, blah, blah, blah.

Your original argument was that since Obama didn't win the primary, no one should be surprised at the poll results. Backpedaling to talk about something else entirely doesn't negate the fact that your original criticism, like many of yours, was totally half-assed.

Pardon my language.

user-pic

I live in NJ. Please explain to me how it is trending GOP? Based on the pre-election polls, Corzine was supposed to have a tough time beating Forrester, to the point that he might lose. He won handily. Menendez, also based on pre-election polls, was at risk of losing to Kean, Jr. - he won handily. This year, 80,000-year old Lautenberg is polling 5-10 pts ahead of whoever the GOP is running. The only reason he is polling so far ahead is that the GOP learned their lesson in the state and put up a nobody candidate.

Every election season in NJ it's the same thing. Polls show the race between the Dem presidential/senate/governor candidate in a tight race with the GOP candidate but come election day, it's almost never close - the Dem always wins.

People in NJ hate politicians, period - doesn't matter which party they belong to. But in the last 10 years, they've focused their hate on the GOP more than the Dems. Obama does not have to worry about NJ. And the McCain camp knows they don't have a chance, which is why they haven't and won't waste any time, money, or energy in the Garden Sate.

user-pic

I guess by that logic, there is no way Barack can win in California either.

From:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/parachutes-away.html

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Parachutes Away!

From ABC News:

Republican ticket mates John McCain and Sarah Palin Monday blasted corporate executives who leave their company with a "golden parachute" and pledged to "stop multimillion dollar payouts" to CEOs, seeming to forget their own top economic adviser Carly Fiorina walked away with $45 million, including a $21.4 million severance package when she was dismissed by Hewlett Packard in 2005.

Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/parachutes-away.html


user-pic

The mcSham campaign can't tell a straight story! So everything they say is somehow disconfirmed. If they were selling breakfast cereal, it would be tainted, but inside the box would be a label on top of the plastic case saying: Toxic. Do not consume.

user-pic

His whole economic reform platform is a mish mosh of Hooverian voluntarism. As though people can be shamed publicly into denying the power of their own greed. Utter nonsense.

From:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/parachutes-away.html

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Parachutes Away!

From ABC News:

Republican ticket mates John McCain and Sarah Palin Monday blasted corporate executives who leave their company with a "golden parachute" and pledged to "stop multimillion dollar payouts" to CEOs, seeming to forget their own top economic adviser Carly Fiorina walked away with $45 million, including a $21.4 million severance package when she was dismissed by Hewlett Packard in 2005.

Cite:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/parachutes-away.html


user-pic

Nice! Candy Crowley can't distinguish a lie from the truth, how did anybody at ABC manage the job?

Has someone tried calculating in new voter estimates into current polls? Not even a pollster, but just someone? Even as a hypothetical? Like turning new voter estimates into some percentage or something to add/subtract from current poll numbers?

If he couldn't muster a majority of voters in a party primary, what makes you think he can get a majority of votes in the general election?
I dunno, maybe it's the fact that I understand what a non sequitur is.
user-pic

Oh, nicely done.

Can anyone explain to me the difference between southern OH and WV? It seems to me that if the WV poll awhile back were right, then OH should be easily ours.

Which unfortunately suggests the WV poll was wrong. The only difference between them, I would think, is that Ohio has been a battleground for Obama and McCain campaigning and media strategy. Which could also suggest that Obama's not effectively countering McCain.

Though that might change soon with the new ads?

West Virginia is sui generis, a thing unto itself.

The only aspect to remember over Ohio it's all the recent polls give McCain a 4 point lead. He maybe has the advantage but he can't put a bigger lead there. There's an opening there and it's up to keep registering new voters, maximize in the areas where the democrats have better appeal, use the early voting weeks to drive the college vote and try to minimize the damage in the troubling areas. Send Bill & Hillary Clinton there...

The game is not over until it's over.


A significant statement in the poll results on independent voters:

"He has an eight point lead with them now after Obama had a 17 point advantage with them in the August poll."

A 23% switch? Don't think so, something is wrong now or before? Palin does not have that much impact in Ohio or anyplace else.

Zephyrus: I understand there's a second poll that shows Obama within 5 in West Virginia.

user-pic

I am scratching my head. It's hard for me to understand how he could be this close in W.Va. Just doesn't make sense. There are a few polls (and this is one of them) that are just really throwing me for a loop.

Advisor says: "McCain helped create the Blackberry"

Go to link; and click recommend. We have to keep this story up front, so click it on up.

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/adviser-says-mccain-helped-cre.php

user-pic

Irrelevant nonsense. There are enough McSame lies out there now to keep in play. There's such thing as overkill.

I am hoping Obama will make fun of this too. Right up there with Al inventing the internet, although Al did have a hand in it.

user-pic

Burton already mentioned it already this AM...and in the same quote mentioned McCain's "fundamentals are strong" statement. That was the right way to do it because the "fundamentals are strong" thing is the statement that needs to be repeated over and over. Burton's mention of the BlackBerry goof is enough. It's in the media, it'll get a day of press, and then it will fade into the background. Just because the GOP and the media savaged Al Gore for the Internet thing doesn't mean Obama's camp needs to waste any more energy on the BlackBerry thing.

Not sure what the impact of the new registrations, and 1st time voters will be. That is the wild card, for sure.

One thing is for certain, the Republicans will be up to their old tricks, doing their best to keep the poor, urban folks from voting. One particularly telling quote from the Rep. Party Chair in Ohio, Kevin Dewine, "nothing is off the table".

There's a proud American for ya, willing to do anything to fuck with someone else's right to vote.


Here's the link, doh!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122125136545029511.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Still waitin' on that preview function, but sure am glad to see my old Punchy avatar back!

Obama does not need to win OH as long as he gets all kerry's states + CO and VA

Isn't Ohio the best state for Obama to attack McCain on wanting to appoint a commission to study the economy?

"McCain wants to appoint a commission, while I will attack the economic woes facing America immediately upon assuming the Presidency. The American worker, the American retiree, the American economy can't wait for a commission to spend months deliberating. Appointing blue ribbon commissions that promise everything and deliver nothing is the tired old politics of Washington, and is not the change we need. Its more of the McSame."

Just a thought.

user-pic

Using that message "idea" but putting it in a folksy way would be advisable, I think.

user-pic

"McCain wants to appoint a commission, while I will attack the economic woes facing America immediately upon assuming the Presidency. The American worker, the American retiree, the American economy can't wait for a commission to spend months deliberating. Appointing blue ribbon commissions that promise everything and deliver nothing is the tired old politics of Washington, and is not the change we need. Its more of the McSame."

"McCain wants to appoint a commission to look at the problem: We already know what the problem is: outsourcing jobs [etc.]. I will attack the problems immediately upon assuming the Presidency. The American worker, the American retiree, the American economy can't wait for a commission to spend months looking at a problem we've alrady identified [another list]. Appointing a commissions is the tired old politics of Washington. Its more of the McSame."

From:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-invents-fire-wheel.html

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

McCain Invents Fire, The Wheel

From ABC News:

McCain and the BlackBerry

This morning McCain domestic policy adviser Douglas Holz-Eakin was asked what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., could point to from his work on the Senate Commerce Committee that would prove to the American people that he has experience on technology issues.

"He did this," Holz-Eakin said, holding up his BlackBerry. "Telecommunications in the United States, the premiere innovation in the past 15 years comes right through the Commerce Committee. So you're looking at the miracle that John McCain helped create. And that's what he did."...

Even more remarkably, he did this using only a piece of flint and crude stone tools.

The first message he sent: "Watson. The fundamentals of the economy are strong."

Cite:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-invents-fire-wheel.html

user-pic

Hilarious!

I am in the Dayton area which has been savaged by the economy. We are looking at the DHL closing and Miamisburg GM Truck plant. This should be very fertile ground for Obama. However, Obama had ceded far too much ground to McCain, especially during the period before his convention. The ads have all been extremely negative with far less coming from Obama. That may be changing now, however, most residents just parrot the Republican talking points - higher taxes in particular. They also just think Obama is weak. Look, this is more than just undecided, secret racists (although there are many). This place was swinging towards Obama. Yes, it was a stretch for many, but a stretch that they seemed ready to make because of the economy. They want a strong leader, Obama ceded this issue.

user-pic

You again? Snooze . . . .

Obama hit on the DHL thing yesterday. He said he would put a stop to that. Did that resonate there?

user-pic

Do you know why they think he's "weak" and why Obama's middle class tax message isn't getting through to these people? I'm not challenging what you said - just would like to no more from somebody who is actually on the ground in Ohio.

Watch the speech from today. This guy gets it. If Ohioans are too dumb to see that, we may need to get to 270 without 'em.

Fundamentally Obama can't win the independent voter who votes with his gut. If this person makes the decision based on who he trusts the most, he will likely swing to the white guy over the black guy. That is a very mild form of racism but it is a fact of life. To get over the problem Obama needs to give a reason to vote for him. He needs to concentrate on a couple of key policy proposals and hammer away until he owns these positions. If he can spend tens of millions of dollars saying "I will lower taxes for the average family by 3000 dollars" and "I will ensure that every child has access to affordable medical care" he can win the independent voters by giving them a reason to vote with their head instead of their gut.


user-pic

I agree. I've been having this discussion with a friend who has actually seen it in action. Being a liberal and a black guy puts Obama in the hole with a lot of these people. These are folks who would never consider themselves racist and would probably never do anything blatantly racist. But I know what they're saying in their head, "This guy seems smart and I'm not crazy about McCain, but I'm not sure I trust him completely. I'm worried that he'll end up giving a bunch of jobs and handouts to blacks/minorities." These are folks who, rightly or wrongly, perceive that they've been held back in their careers in or in financial matters in general because of affirmative action. And affirmative action is directly tied to the Democrats/liberal. If the Dem candidate is black/a minority, that makes these folks even more suspect. The closer you get to the actual election, the more this thought will pop into these voters' minds. They may remain undecided up until election day, but when this pops into their head again while their in the booth, they'll likely pull the lever for McCain.

I guess that's why so many folks were calling on Obama to propose a needs/income based affirmative action policy rather than one based on race/gender. I have mixed feelings about that. On the one hand, it would definitely blunt the dynamic I described above, to the point that it probably cease to exist. On the other hand, there just seems to be too much racism and sexism still out there. In addition, in a year in which the Dem candidate needs to get out the AA vote big time, I'm sure it's the best move politically.

user-pic

"From ABC News:

"Republican ticket mates John McCain and Sarah Palin Monday blasted corporate executives who leave their company with a "golden parachute" and pledged to "stop multimillion dollar payouts" to CEOs, seeming to forget their own top economic adviser Carly Fiorina walked away with $45 million, including a $21.4 million severance package when she was dismissed by Hewlett Packard in 2005."

Must be sexism: I was never paid so much as a penny the several times I was fired from jobs. Or is it that I didn't know I should both accuse others of being elitist, and feel entitled?

I'm sure, though, she'll donate the most of that to charity -- which, of course, begins at home.

She will donate tanning booths to all Governor mansions in the U.S. with that money :)

I lived most of my life in Ohio. Yes, there are a a lot of closeted racists and "drill baby drill" chanting idiots. But this is true of any state. These people are lost causes and no time should be wasted wringing hands over them. The few remaining undecideds are not lost causes. Obama simply has not been effective in convincing them that he is their man and that McCain is Bush's man. My mom in Ohio was laid off her blue collar job a few years ago. Her husband was laid off this year. They could care less that McCain has a bunch of lobbyists running his campaign. They're probably not sure what a lobbyist does. Obama needs to focus on the economy!

There is no doubt collectively the trend in polls is a cause for concern- not panic yet- but legitimate concern.

I wonder what more or different Obama can do to win?

Obama has run almost flawless campaign for 20 months- from organizing, volunteering, fundraising to offering a new direction. Obama has done almost everything better than any other campaign in the last decade.

I'm dissappointed not with Obama but American electrate who continue to fall prey for gimmicks and those who are willing to embrace the same 8 years of disaster.

I don't know how deep we should fall before we begin voting on the basis of our real concerns.

Despite default political disadvantagous Barack Obama has done remarkable a job.

user-pic

Compare Sherrod Brown's message with that of Obama, and you'll have your answer.

The difference is between an authentic demand-sided economic populist and a freakonomic neoliberal.

I'll go to the wall to get Obama in office, but the truth is the truth.

user-pic

There are still seven weeks to election day, and they're going to be seven weeks of economic chaos. Any state with polling differences in the single digits is subject to change. Ohio remains winnable for Obama if he and we all keep working at it.

McCain is still riding out his Palin bump. Some of that support will stick until the election, but some won't. Governor Nowhere has already lost her bright new shiny coin status with the media. And McCain has used up his get out of questions free cards with the media.

Which means pretty much anything could happen now.

user-pic

Obama won't vigorously campaign against NAFTA, yet McCain tars and feathers him as a protectionist who will kill international trade. This is a huge strategic mistake and a big reason - bigger than racism, ignorance or stupidity - why McCain is up in Ohio.

Indeed, anything could happen,,,,,,,,,, like some serious investigation of Todd (Bluto from the Popeye strip)Palin always being within groping distance of poor little Sarah when she appears or is speaking. He has a bad history of that back home on the tundra, and the continuation of that on the campaign trail looks downright sicko.

McCain will probably well us we're getting a twofur,,,,,, two for the price of one. Sicko.

I wonder if it's time for Obama's surrogates to confront this 'hidden racism' head-on. Of course, it would have to be handled carefully, but I think it's time to confront people with that well-hidden secret that it's not okay to vote for a black man for President. Maybe it's time for Obama to deal with it too..just before the election..to call people out about this.

A lot of voters in rural Ohio seriously like Palin. I've had people tell me they were leaning towards Obama earlier but changed their minds due to Sarah.

This gives me hope that the numbers will start to turn around as the Palin bubble deflates. It also says that Obama can't ignore her completely as he focuses on the issues.

I think we are all forgetting state polls take longerto come around after a convention bounce than do national polls. Look I think Ohio is a tough get, however, given the constant undrestimation even by PPP of AA % for Mccain (most have it between 8 -12%) that is at least a point maybe two right there. Additionally no one including the best pollsters know what kind of turn out there will be but just from experience if it is bigger than expected that is always going to favor Obama. Does that mean one point, none or 4 or 5? Also the economy just became even more of a factor than it was when these polls where taken so what do the internals say when broken down on the economy? If we see these same polls mere days before Nov 4 then color me worried until then it is called a swing state for a reason.

Obama is still very close in Ohio. He's hitting economy hard, and the fact that Palin is a nut job will penetrate more broadly there over the coming weeks, as will the spreading economic chaos. Obama will do better in the debates, and will run an agressive ground game. All of that is worth at least 5 points.

Ease up on the gloom and doom!!!

The news is actually worse than just Ohio. Chuck Todd of MSNBC said Obama could lose Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan. Obama loses the election if those three states fall no matter how you look at it. Chuck Todd has been phenomenally accurate, he's the one who said the Dems would win the Senate and the House in 2006 and even after Ohio and Pennsylvania went to Hillary, he pretty much guaranteed Obama would win the election. The posts claiming racism is a big reason for Ohio's loss are accurate, according to Todd. He said all three states will solidify support for Dems in the Senate, House, local and state races. Todd suggested Obama appear more with Biden in those states to show a friendly white face next to him.

It's amazing but true: these blue-collar uneducated voters will vote against their own interests (jobs, healthcare, home values, national debt killing the economy, increasing oil prices, etc.) to support their racist fears.

I hope Obama can bring Biden and both Clintons with him to Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan to assure these voters. Otherwise it's going to be a sad era for America the next 4 years. If these voters think the economy is bad now, they ain't seen nothing yet.

Exactly. Is anyone aware of recent polling in Wisconsin and Michigan? I'd add Pennsylvania, but I'm fairly confident Obama will carry the state by at least 2% (there's no polling to indicate otherwise). Michigan and Wisconsin, on the other hand, might be a bit more troubling.

Also, while I'm at it, any news about New Mexico and Colorado? Does anyone have any advance information that RCP has yet to acquire?

I'll wait to draw conclusions about potential Obama momentum until polling done from the 15th onward is released.

I agree with the following assessment: Obama wins the election if he holds the Kerry States (hence the Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin inquiry) + Iowa, New Mexico, and Colorado. Iowa seems to be a lock. I assume the Latino vote is huge in New Mexico, anyone have any data on Latino support for Obama in the southwest?

yawning!!!! i am grateful for the 50 state strategy, but in life you win some and you lose some...OH, WV, KY are gonna tough it out with McCain no matter what!!! Obama just doesn't look like the other Presidents....so what if his policies are sound? So what his running mate looks just like them? So what his whole team is diverse, but more white men running around? So freaking what? People let's face it-for some, the thought of a black man or a woman for that matter is just too much to muster!!!!

If you think Hillary winning over the bigots implies automatic victory in November, you have no clue...these people had to choose b/c a black man and white woman..at the end, the white woman was less scary....but faced with a white woman and white man, do you really think Hill would have won on the bread and butter issues alone? Get real!!!! Appac is what it is-RACIST/SEXIST/BIGOTED!!!!

Some of these comments are disturbing because they seem to be already giving up on Ohio. Ohio is hard to grasp because it is really three regions inside one state, but it is winnable. The battle, it seems to me, will be won or lost in the suburbs and in the middle, midwestern part of the state.

Don't forget that John Kerry came very close to winning Ohio in 2004. He wasn't exactly the type of guy who would fit in well in southeast Ohio (I lived there during the 2000 campaign), and he was going up against a GOP machine in almost complete control of the state.

This time around, Obama has the advantage of having a democratic secretary of state AND a democratic governor, Ted Strickland, who is from southeast Ohio and represented it in congress. Add to that McCain's admitted incompetence on the economy and at this point I'd give Obama at least a 50/50 shot of winning the state.

It'll be close, but we can make it happen!

- Phoebe Fay: "Ohio remains winnable for Obama if he and we all keep working at it."

Yes, Phoebe. I agree.
Ohio remains winnable.
New Hampshire remains winnable.
CO, MI, WI, MO

IF he and WE all keep working at it!

Today, any of us can call our neighbor right from our own home or office (http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/votercontactTraining/).

Keep. Working.

Leave a comment

Recommended Reader Posts

  • Unwritten...
    by stillidealistic
  • Two Dreamers, by Dorothea Lange
    by Rutabaga Ridgepole
  • Tsunami Wave: Will Wipe Out Republican Party
    by coonsey
  • OBVIOUSLY, YOU AREN'T A HUNTER.....
    by wvbiker
  • The Stupack Amendment played politics with women's lives and won.
    by J. Clarence
  • holly colorado
    by blumun
  • figures geometry
    by muberul
  • micropipette
    by muretol
  • short stories
    by lumacer
  • elemtary school
    by luborum



  • Resources

    The Palin Effect

    GOP Map Of Sleaze

    Tire Swinging

    The Final Debate

    World of Sleaze

    All About Sarah

    The Presidential Debates: Round 2

    The Vice-Presidential Debates: Biden v. Palin

    Critic or Cheerleader The Definitive McCain Iraq Timeline

    The John McCain John Hagee Timeline

    Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Reporter-Bloggers
    Elana Schor
    Eric Kleefeld



    Subscribe to this blog's feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address