« Charlie Gibson: McCain's Favorite Network Anchor? | Home | Sarah Palin To Do Real Live Press Conference? »

Still More Polls Show McCain Convention Bounce

Today's polls confirm that John McCain is enjoying a post-convention bounce, though it might not be all that drastic in terms of the big picture:

Today's Gallup poll has McCain again 49%-45%, outside the ±2% margin of error. McCain was down seven points in Gallup before his convention began -- but going back a bit further, he'd inched into a two-point lead just before the Democratic convention gave Barack Obama his own artificial bounce. In this sense, McCain's bounce has put him just ahead of where he started before the conventions.

Today's Rasmussen poll has McCain ahead 48%-47%, with a ±2% margin of error. McCain trailed by around five points before the Republican Convention, and the two candidates were about even right before the Democratic Convention.

The new CNN poll, on the other hand, presents a different story. They have the race tied at 48%-48% each. Right before the Dem Convention, they put the race at a 47%-47% tie, and after the Dem gathering it was only an insignificant 49%-48% lead for Obama. So CNN never really had much of an Obama bounce, and they don't have a McCain bounce, either.

Bear in mind that McCain's convention bounce could turn out to be just as ephemeral as Obama's was -- given that such bounces are a product of one candidate dominating news coverage for a whole week.


89 Comments

| Leave a comment

Polls, schmolls.

The election will be won on the ground, not in Gallup's rose-colored offices.

They're muave and eggshell-taupe, not rose colored. Hope That Helps...

Yup, let's do nothing and count on this mythical ground game to win this election. It's time to rip apart the Repuglican's lies and expose them for the vermin that they are.

The Obama campaign should start holding daily press conferences to point out all the recent lies and then use that to show how out of touch they are. When are we going to have some initiative?

Still no 50% in the tracking polls. I believe Obama went as high as 51%.

So was this not expected?

user-pic

You know, with Josh getting an avalanche of panicked email, one might think these polls wouldn't be pounced on and heralded with such glee.

but of course, one would be wrong.

Whatever the polls show I agree completely with Josh, it is long past time for Obama to start making some news and stop reacting to it.

Agreed. Time for some major speeches before important audiences on domestic and foreign policy issues. Not rock-a-thons, but hard-hitting political speech.

Two months of hard-knocks politics is not going to change Obama. He can afford to do it, and then it will be over.

Yep; Obama is doing q and a sessions with small groups and off-the-cuff responses to the Palin-McCain express. It's time for him to get serious and get to work with something formal, important, and newsworthy.

I am reminded of the 2004 campaign. Bush went around with a speech in a notebook, hitting the same points in the same words day after day. Kerry ad libbed. It made Kerry seem unfocused.

But take heart. In every basketball game there's a point where the trailing team goes on a run and makes a big push. Obama knows the game and he knows how to grab momentum. Now's the time to do it.

This to me has been the most mystifying thing about the Obama campaign. They had no shortage of money and opportunity to define John McCain, especially with McCain heading into a convention so woefully unprepared and with

I want to blame the horse-race-minded media for this, and that's probably a fair part of it - but how come the Obama camp doesn't seem to recognize this, and *act* accordingly? Jeezus effin' Christ, we're talking about negatively defining a guy who can't keep track of how many homes he owns, who rubs his jaw on camera in obvious discomfort and promises to 'get back to us', and needs a cleanup on aisle five, and yet he comes out of his convention with a boatload of momentum and is getting away with co-opting all the positives that Obama was supposed to represent.

I have a very, very, very bad feeling about this.

Dear Psyclone:

I agree. We can't wait for the media to get our message because they are followers not leaders. They tilt Republican. We had our chance to knock this bum out. Now it may be too late.

Joe

user-pic

"We can't wait for the media to get our message because they are followers not leaders. They tilt Republican."

Dude...seriously?...come up for air sometime. Just because the MSM is right of you doesn't mean they "tilt Republican." FNC, Talk Radio and the WSJ tilt right...everything else tilts left (I grant you that none, with the exception of MSNBC, may tilt far enough to the left to please you, but they all tilt left).

user-pic

...and the Washington Times...right...that's it though.

McCain has been defining himself as untrustworthy - a cynical liar, really - in pretty much every speech/action/what have you. I'm hoping the Obama campaign is waiting for the right moment to go for that. If they are successful in that, McCain will collapse. His only strength is that he's perceived to be trustworthy.

I'm hoping the Obama campaign is waiting for the right moment to go for that.

Yeah, that moment was about a month ago. I can't even imagine what they're waiting for at this point.

Maybe by 2016, the Dems will come up with a candidate who actually figures out that it's not enough to respond, even 'rapidly', to Reep attacks, and to wait for the corporate, Republican-friendly media to get into their corner.

The basic problem is, that when your opponent has no respect for the truth, you're at a disadvantage.

Obama had pretty clearly defined McCain as "more of the same" and "out of touch" and the definition seemed to have a fair amount of resonance, because that's what McCain had been all through the spring and summer.

But McCain has now resurrected his maverick image -- he's no longer out of touch because of his "Wal-Mart Mom" VP and together they are going to bring "change" to Washington.

Obama now needs to keep hammering on the fakeness (and the lies) of the new-improved-post-convention McCain. And from what I've seen, that's what he's been doing, which an increasing emphasis on the lies ("you can't just make stuff up"). But its going to take time for that to wear the gloss off this newly minted version of McCain.

Personally, I'd like to see an ad structure along the lines of the Daily Shows comparison of McCain and Bush speeches.

What goes up, must come down. We won't be able to tell much until the end of the week, or so the pollster dorks say. Let's hope this is a highwater mark. Maybe the Charles Gibson interview will bring about a cold dose of reality. Oh. Wait. Nevermind...

http://pufferfish.typepad.com/

Add the Doug Wilder/Bradley effect, the margin for Senator McCain and his bimbo VP is greater. The end of the Barry Hussein Obama dream is near. Barry Hussein and PMSNBC implode! Praise Allah!

user-pic

There is no wilder/bradley effect. People are really telling the pollsters what they think. That's why Obama has never had more than a 4-6 point lead.If he were white, his lead in the polls would be double that.

But we have to stop panicking. Last week, everybody praised Obama's campaign. He was brilliant. But now that the polls show McCain ahead, everybody says Obama's campaign is awful. What changed? He's got to keep doing what he's doing.

And, before long, the media will tire of the shiny new object aka Sara Palin.

Obama's campaign has sucked since the Ohio/PA primaries. The DEMS have second thoughts but it was too late. The leftists took over the party. Now us oldsters who actually have seen war (Vietnam) will support an American hero not the son of a African drunk and a mother who dumped her kid on her grandparents. Barry is so messed up that he doesn't even know what religion he practices or has been lying about being Christian as he noted "my Muslim faith." Reverend Wright's Greatest Hits will appear soon!!!!!

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/08/obama-mistake-on-being-muslim-seized-by-rivals/


McCain/Bimbo 2008; Hillary Clinton 2012!!!!!

user-pic

Hey, had I known you would quote the Washington Times, I never would have bothered respond to you. In the future, I'll reserve my responses to Democrats and since you're not one . . . My bad.

To hell with you. You 'oldsters' as you say had your chance to run this country and fucked it right up the ass. Now its our turn to clean up your mess.

To hell with you. You 'oldsters' as you say had your chance to run this country and fucked it right up the ass. Now its our turn to clean up your mess.

There was no measurable Bradley effect during the primaries.

BS! Look at the exit polls, wrong big time.

user-pic

Provide a link to your evidence.

One example... do your own research:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/22/pennsylvania-exit-polls-p_n_98069.html

Hillary won PA by 10% not 4%. Check Ohio, also.
The end of the road is coming for Barry...back to that subcommittee on Afghanistan he doesn't bother chair.

McCain/Bimbo 2008; CLINTON 2012!!!

user-pic

Dear Bimbo lover,

You make it so easy to respond, it's embarassing. First, in order for there to be a Bradley effect, the preprimary poll numbers would have to underestimate Clinton's ultimate margin of victory. Here's some actual, you know, data about that, from Pollster.com:

InsiderAdvantage
4/21/08 712 LV 49 42 (7)
Zogby/Newsmax
4/20-21/08 675 LV 51 41 (10)
ARG
4/20-21/08 600 LV 56 40 (16)
Rasmussen
4/20/08 722 LV 49 44 (5)
InsiderAdvantage
4/20/08 747 LV 49 39 (10)

An average of 9.6.

Clinton's actual margin of victory?

user-pic

I'll answer that myself.

Clinton: 54.6. Obama 45.4.

A difference of 9.2.

OMG! THE BRADLEY EFFECT IN REVERSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! or something.

Why don't you follow your own advice, bimbo lover, and do your own research?

user-pic

It's more commonly reffered to as the BRADY effect (as in Mike and Carol).

user-pic

Hmmm. Sorry. I only have Tom Brady on my mind today.

If it's any consolation, the Patriots aren't going to miss the playoffs or anything. I mean, we've still got Moss and Welker, right?

user-pic

Yes, well, they need a someone to throw to them, don't they?

If the Patriots manage to make it back to the playoffs this year, I'll be pretty impressed.

user-pic

...and a talented (if slightly inexperienced) back up ready to step in and lead on day one!

user-pic

...and a talented (if slightly inexperienced) back up ready to step in and lead on day one!

user-pic

If the Bradley effect was in the exit polls, I guess there must have been one for John Kerry, too, huh? The 2004 exit polls had Kerry winning Florida and Ohio (which he lost) and PA by 10 points.

Those exit polls were "unweighted" in the primary. Bradley effect refers to pre-election polling. In many cases, Obama finished way ahead of where the polls predicted -- SC, GA, MD, VA, OR, WI, MT. In many others, he finished precisely where the polls predicted. In NH, polls predicted he would get 36% of the vote. He did. Problem was, Hillary got 38% which no one predicted.

I guess this is the difference between the (post Popular Front) left and the right: when things start going wrong for the right, they double down on their faith that they can push harder and win. When the smallest blip occurs for the left's plans for a giant landslide, everybody's already packing everything in and rolling up the banners. HAVE SOME FAITH PEOPLE! Do you want to WIN or not?! Double-down already!

Franzi:

As a typical Democrat who tends to panic I hope you are correct, this is just a blip. But I tend to fear the media is in the bag for the Republicans. The owners tell the anchors and editors "take it easy on McCain, he's going to let us consolidate our holdings and pay less taxes." Then the anchors and editors filter down the bias to the reporters and we see a "surge" of positive coverage on Palin that wipes out the faux change message of Republicans and completely drowns out whatever Obama and Biden say. When Obama and Biden do appear on TV it seems like an avalanche of Rev. Wright-style vitriol like Tom Brokaw unleashed on Biden yesterday. Now Charles Gibson, half of the Stephanapoulos "Do you love America" team has been tapped to promote Palin even more. Anything less than another major speech on race or a switch from Biden to Clinton will keep us on our heels or behind in the polls.

Joe

Well, I certainly can understand why people are upset. It's an unsettling proposition: the fundies win again, four more years (or more). But dropping the Biden pick isn't going to happen; it just won't, and the sooner we Democrats just move on, the better it will be for all of us. And I desperately understand the fear of the media. But we all knew this when we got into this election. And if this were Hillary, it would be the same dance, different song. If the media has it in for the democrats, then we can either give up, or keep fighting, harder, faster. But worrying ourselves to death about things that we can't control is THE ABSOLUTE LAST thing we need.

Obama will run the campaign that best makes him feel comfortable, and I feel that ultimately, that is the best way for us to win. Let him plan his own fight. Sometimes I feel that, more than winning, we on the left just want to be proven "right" or "smartest" -- whether it means calling out McCain's lies or whether that means pointing when we think Obama missed an opportunity. I don't want to just "win" an argument -- or just "any" argument. Being "smart" isn't what winning elections is about: just look at the Republicans. No, putting yourself out there and believing we're ultimately doing something greater than winning an election -- that is the ultimate goal/dream. And if we can't live our lives believing in something greater that Republicans can't destroy -- or if Democrats blink every time something doesn't go our way -- I think that says more about us than it does about Obama.

user-pic

Gosh, you sound like me on one of my good days.

And I sure appreciate it. I caught the panic bug that has been going around in a big way and I really don't like it.

Sometimes I wonder if the sneaky Rovian strategy of the Palin pick was to get people second guessing the Biden pick.

If Obama had picked Clinton, McCain wouldn't have picked Palin, he'd have picked someone safer and more moderate. He wouldn't be running as on change and mavericky-ness, he'd be running on experience and good sense. Nice, comfortable, experienced white men vs. a couple of "celebrities" (one black, one a woman with a loose-cannon husband and a scandal-ridden past).

We'd been feeling panicked about different things, but my guess is that the poll numbers would similar, and there would be fewer opportunities to beat them back over the next 8 weeks.

user-pic

franzi, your points are all well taken but I, for one, use these forums to vent my frustrations while I still maintain a positive perspective for a win in November. I'm convinced that Obama will be in the oval office unless Karl Rove can get cozy with Diebold again. It doesn't mean I have no stake in what I consider to be possible falters on the road, or that I am happy to leave it all to somebody else (though somebody else is exactly who WILL handle it). We all think we are pretty damned important (or, at least, our thoughts count) or we wouldn't be posting. Clearly, you feel that your notions about posting behavior are worthy, if nothing else.
I can be nervous about my kids missteps in school for example, but I never question that they will get their degrees in the end anyhow. That's worked out so far.
FWIW, I'm on Republican mailing lists. I assure you they are hardly certain about taking the cake.

Let's just stop focusing on the polls, get into reality and start focusing on getting the word out on the real issues. We need to do whatever we can, in our own small ways, to get Obama - Biden elected. All of these pollsters and the MSM, especially CNN, are making a tremendous amount of money spinning this crap. The election will be decided by an intense grassroots effort on the part of all of us. Don't let the election be decided by shallow, under-educated pretty faces on cable and profit-driven pollsters. They don't care about this country - All they care about is lining their paychecks.

I'm willing to bet most Americans care about that too.

So when McCain is spouting out LIES about Obama's tax plan, and they don't know the difference, that could be all it takes.

user-pic

I agree that it is time for Obama to make some news. I am tired of headlines that start "Obama Responds To Palin Attacks."

As to the polls. This is the McCain bounce at its crest. Things will settle down. Don't panic just yet.

Eric,

Interesting analysis, unfortunately, the MSM won't these meaningless polls the way you do. The MSM will take these polls and skew them to create the perception that the race is actually close.

How about that 1-pt lead in Michigan?

That's positive.

Run an ad with the former Mayor of Detroit and current felon endorsing Barry...end of lead.

You seem to have some serious issues with race.

Only if that applies to AAs who support Barry almost unanimously. Or maybe Ms. Oprah who won't even have the Bimbo on her show. Otherwise I'm just like them; but I support the old white American Hero.

user-pic

Oprah has not had *any* candidate on her show since announcing her support for Obama, including Obama. She said at the beginning that she wouldn't have any candidate on. Why should she have Palin on? Oh, I know. She's the shiny new object.

The McCain bounce will dissipate by the end of the week possibly early nextweek. However, I agree with Ronbyers, the Obama campaign needs take the headlines back from McShame and they can start by going after Sara Fallin's ridiculous housing gaffe.

And here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO4k1fIjivg&eurl

The gaffe begins at 0:54, the audio is crappy.

Even McCain himself frowned at her statement!

user-pic

That's hillarious...

user-pic

You know lalo, for some strange reason there was time when I was about half inch away from actually liking you.


Thanks for exploding that delusion.

Well, I still like you, even now.

Even though you are temporarily in a bubble created by Palin.

Even though you refuse to see that the Palin strategy has been one big failure from the beginning and the blogosphere did more harm than to good to Obama.

When is Obama going to get backing to doing what he does best.... Talking about himself.. That's what got him this far.

Forget Palin, forget McCain, forget Bush. Focus on OBAMA, OBAMA, OBAMA.

Sadly it's seems like the The One and allusions of a Messiah complex got to him and has him scared to talk about himself anymore.

Anyway, Obama sucks at attacking. And finding surragates to fight his battles has been ineffective as evidenced by the recent polling.

LOL

Troll meet troll.

This is bad news, but then again, I'm beginning to really like the idea of moving to Australia so maybe it's actually good news. Good luck with that whole "new-clear holocaust" thing northern hemispherites.

user-pic

Screw the polls. Remember how accurate the "exit" polls were in 2004? The results were nearly the complete obverse of most predictions.
So, if Rove doesn't still have the keys to the Diebold operation, Obama should take the office in January.

user-pic

I shouldn't bust on Eric - he really did a good job on the post. I just don't like feeling discouraged.

It's really mostly the RNC bounce, but I hope people woke up a bit now. "We are 30 points down" was the basis for the success during the Primaries and people seem to have forgotten this mindset quite a bit, making a win sound like a sure thing (remember 2004?). Work as if Obama was 30 % behind McCain and this thing will be easily won. Work as if Obama wins this for sure and we are in for President Palin.

It's really mostly the RNC bounce, but I hope people woke up a bit now. "We are 30 points down" was the basis for the success during the Primaries and people seem to have forgotten this mindset quite a bit, making a win sound like a sure thing (remember 2004?). Work as if Obama was 30 % behind McCain and this thing will be easily won. Work as if Obama wins this for sure and we are in for President Palin.

Sorry, the comment function is behaving stupid again.

user-pic

Guys, all we can do is our best. Obama is counting on the ground game to help win this and that is us.

As Joe Biden says "If the bully knocks you down, you get back up and bloody his nose so you can hold your head up the next time you walk down the street."

Did anybody think the Republicans were going to roll over and play dead this year so we could win without a fight? Nope. Do the Republicans think that we will roll over? Maybe. But if they do, they are ever so wrong. We will fight and we will win.

Biden is just like Dick Cheney...multiple deferments for Nam... a eunuch like Barry. Biden needs better hair plugs and a pacifier. Joey Biden: a bunch of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Clinton 2012!!!

McCain/Bimbo 2008!

By all means, share your own illustrious war record with us, hero.

user-pic

national tracking polls are meaningless.

do you have any state polls? those would probably be more relevant.

Well, PPP has a poll of Michigan, showing Obama leading by 1 (from +3 about six weeks ago). Poll was done over the weekend (9/6 and 9/7). Rasmussen's also sitting on a few state polls to be released tonight.

Embracing the idea that this is a change election puts McCain in a possibly winning but also extremely perilous position because the claim to represent change is inherently preposterous.

And of course the American electorate has never bought into preposterous claims by politicians before!

Gobama!

The election is now a sure thing, since McCain has proffered something preposterous.

Gak!

So it's a toss up in the polls. Obama needs to match the "audacity" of dopes. Why not take the "straight talk" mantle from McGrumpy since he took "change" from Obama.

Here's the straight talk you've been missin':

(List them ALL - let them scroll by lioke the credits in a bad "maverick" western)

Then: looks like "the straight talk express" got de-railed.

Make it lighthearted. "Just a joke" guys. Just kidding. Lighten up.

Polls be damned! Chuck Todd's new Microsoft Surface toy trumps them all!

Face it yall, Its over; we have lost but I will not vote for Hillary in 2012.

My snark radar must be broken.

WTF are you talking about? If you are ready to write off this election, you are either a troll or just plain stupid.

user-pic

I know - people, we're

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!

We'll never win again.


[rolls eyes]

The only thing that is wrong with us is: Too much McLame-Cindersarah; not enough Obama.

And what's wrong with Joe Biden all of a sudden that y'all are harshing on him? He is the perfect running mate for Obama, are you kidding? A woman and a black man on one ticket? I don't think so. This is a reassuring ticket for men who just can't handle race/gender issues - and I know they're out there.

user-pic

Since eliminating polling - except done privately by candidates who would be fined if their numbers got out - could not reasonably be challenged even by Constitution-thumpers, I suggest they be outlawed.

Not only are we not privy to the questions, to who comprised the group sampled, to the biases of the pollsters (everyone has biases), poll results often launch what is known in advertising country as the band-wagon effect. (I think it's that effect that we're witnessing in the present Palin-mania that's occurring.)

If they were merely a media gimmick, which they are, OK, but because their numbers can move people to vote a certain way, based on nothing but the very human need to jump on the band-wagon, they should be outlawed.

user-pic

You know lalo, for some strange reason there was time when I was about half inch away from actually liking you.


Thanks for exploding that delusion.

. . . but because their numbers can move people to vote a certain way, based on nothing but the very human need to jump on the band-wagon, they should be outlawed.

It's hard to wrap one's mind around a statement with this much inanity in it.

Let's outlaw political conventions, acceptance speeches, and a host of other activities that move people to vote using the band-wagon effect.

After all, the public doesn't get access to the draft notes and behind-the-scenes meetings used to prepare the speeches, organize the conventions, etc, so clearly those activities are not constitutionally protected!

In fact, since we don't get the drafts of a writer's novel or works of non-fiction or any of the underlying thoughts that went into producing the final result and novels and non-fiction works "move" people in ways we might disagree with, let's outlaw all final written works too!

I think this race will be even more difficult to predict than usual and polls will be even less useful than they usually are. The Bush/Kerry and Bush/Gore elections are our most recent experiences, but Obama and McCain are some of the most unconventional candidates in history and therefore appeal to voters in different ways than previous candidates did.

For example, Obama may run ahead of his national numbers in Virginia and Colorado: he attracts younger voters and professionals; combined with the large African American vote in Virginia and the sizable Hispanic vote in Colorado, he could win these states that John Kerry had very little chance of winning. On the other hand, Obama may run behind his national polling numbers places like Pennsylvania or Michigan, which Al Gore and John Kerry won.

McCain's support is now even harder to gauge. He used to have some appeal to voters like myself, an independent-minded voter in my early 30s who doesn't fall in line with either party's ideological foundations. Now, with McCain's cave-in on a whole host of right-wing ideological positions that he once strongly opposed and a cynical VP pick, there's no way I would even consider voting for him. On the other hand, he seems to have revved up the GOP base. He has so far done this fairly artfully, without connecting himself too much to GWB. Some people may still vote for the formerly independent-minded John McCain while others will vote for the new and improved ideologically pure John McPalin. A combination of these votes could win, but if independents see the cave-in, cynical, lack-of-integrity, fallen John McCain, he's a goner.

Add to this instability the following wild cards:

--The supposed but largely unproven Bradley affect (which, if it operates at all, probably operates differently in different states and regions)
--The possibility of gaffes by Palin or Biden
--Turnout. Obama is trying to do on a larger scale what he did in Iowa. The infrastructure is in place, new voters are being registered. Now, how many of them will vote? Will the GOP right wing turn out to support a VP pick even though they have long despised the GOP candidate for POTUS?
--Possible voting irregularities.
--And of course, a volatile environment for the economy and foreign affairs.

If the election is close, I just don't see how it can be predicted. So, the important thing to do is do some actual work to turn out voters, raise funds, etc. That may make the difference.

It seems that every presidential cycle, the Democrats run their convention first, then the Republicans come along, squash the bounce, and ride the wave to November. What's the deal with that? Why don't we ever choose to be second. McCain effectively deflated Obama's bounce and post convention glow, with the Palin announcement, which sucked all the air out of his coverage. Along comes the Republican convention, and what is there to reciprocate, nothing? Am I missing something here?

That's it. I am not giving another penny to the Obama campaign until he starts to spend some money to destroy the Repuglican thugs. What the hell is wrong with our party? Just sitting there pretty while the Repuglican thugs over and over again paint our candidates with lies.

It is time to ATTACK and destroy grandpa's circus act. I will start giving to the Obama campaign when the party finds its backbone. This is pathetic. People who do not pay attention are going to think that Democrats are week of defence when they don;t see democrats defending themselves!

The party in power always gets the second convention (last ups) by virtue of a historical tradition.

And it does provide an advantage to some extent.

At 6 pm Eastern today, Rasmussen releases polls for OH, PA, FL, VA, and CO.

Great and you combine that with the Democrat's historical tendency to be a bunch of pansys who will not defend themselves and no wonder we keep getting screwed at every election. I remember Obama talking about bringing a gun to a fight if someone brought a knife. Well, the Repuglicans have not only bought knives and guns to the fight, they are now firing volleys of multi-barrel rocket launchers at us. What is our response? When are we going to start attaching? 80% of the country feels we are going the wrong direction. How hard is it to attack the McSame circus aggressively and expose the Repuglicans for who they are? It is time to attack and win an election for a change. Obama gutted all our 527s while the Repuglicans are out attacking us on all fronts. No wonder the general public thinks that the Repuglicans are better handing national security and defence. It is sickening!

Quick! Let's attack Eric for only focusing on bad poll results!

Wait...

There has been a lot of talk about McCain tapping into the so-called "Reagan Democrats." The reason that Reagan appealed to these folks is that he reached out to them in a way that conveyed that he understood their struggles. McCain has not made a similar "outreach" and if anything, he has telegraphed that he is out of touch with their needs. Furthermore, he has denigrated the notion of "Hope" and by doing so, he has condescended to the very voters that he needs to win in November. McCain is no Ronald Reagan.

There has been a lot of talk about McCain tapping into the so-called "Reagan Democrats." The reason that Reagan appealed to these folks is that he reached out to them in a way that conveyed that he understood their struggles. McCain has not made a similar "outreach" and if anything, he has telegraphed that he is out of touch with their needs. Furthermore, he has denigrated the notion of "Hope" and by doing so, he has condescended to the very voters that he needs to win in November. McCain is no Ronald Reagan.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address