« McCain Campaign: Palin's 17-Year-Old Daughter Is Pregnant | Home | Reuters Lets Anonymous McCain Aide Tie Obama To Pregnancy Rumors »

Report: Palin's Spokesperson Didn't Know About Pregnancy Two Days Ago

The Anchorage Daily News, in its write-up of the announcement that 17-year-old Bristol Palin is pregnant, reveals that Sarah Palin's spokesperson didn't know about this two days ago:

The Daily News had asked Palin's press secretary, Bill McAllister, over the weekend to address rumors that Bristol was pregnant.

"I don't know. I have no evidence that Bristol's pregnant," he said on Saturday.

The McCain campaign says they knew about the pregnancy, but this suggests the possibility that they didn't -- and raises further questions about how thoroughly McCain vetted, and how much he knew, and knows, about the person he selected as his back-up commander-in-chief.


162 Comments

| Leave a comment

Yes. I think betting is the only real issue re: Junogate. And Greg, also remember the remark to the NYT over the weekend, where the McCain camp said outright that they hadn't vetted other members of the Palin family.

Obviously, I mean "vetting" not "betting." Though it might be interesting to take bets . . .

McCain sure gambled with this bomb and it tis tick, tock, tick, tocking now.

yeah, theres new stuff coming out about her everyday. Theres even a new scandal about her wrongfully firing another person "Troopgate part 2"

Palin,”I would choose life” If Her Daughter Was Raped

Don't you mean "Juneau-gate"?

Or would that be "Juneau-gate"? ;-)

Don't you mean "Juneau-gate"? ;-)

Don't you mean "Juneau-gate"? ;-)

Jeez. Does this mean we might not get to have Palin on McCain's ticket? I hope the Repubs "stay the course" on this one, for the Democrats' sake.

user-pic

First rule of a veep pick: Do no harm.

McCain failed that royally. What person in their right mind would want their veep choice to be surrounded by teen pregnancy stories and rumors of faked pregnancies? I forgot. McCain isn't in his right mind.

This is what happens when you go with your "gut" folks!

user-pic

I"m starting to giggle about all this. In fact, I'm getting way over being annoyed and starting to have fun.

Alex, you sir have been the best wit on these boards for days. I salute you!

Oh, I know! It's worth a brief recap:

1. Anti-science
2. Anti-choice
3. Pro Big Oil
4. Nixonian executive skills
5. Pre-packaged GOP Scandel (no waiting!)
6. Is beginning to have truth-telling problems
7. Was vetted by America's Mullahs:

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/1/24846/28141/Front_Page/The_Council_For_National_Policy_Meets_In_Minn_Vets_Palin

I love the quotes from the paper of the tiny town where she was mayor that no one from the GOP ever stopped by to ask about the next seat cover-- er, ah, veep...

user-pic

Big fat kiss to you, Marioth!


CTvoter - I do not agree. This is also about this woman's goddamn anti-woman beliefs. It is!

user-pic

Well, sure, Tena, in reality, it's about Palin's beliefs, her job experience, and her knowledge about world affairs, etc.

But in media land, it's about Sarah Palin being a woman, nothing else. Her stances on issues aren't receiving much attention, although I give props to the Times this A.M. pointing out that she was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it. My point is that if Democrats try to say "This candidate is antiwoman" at this point in time, it's just going to get boiled down into "The Dems are sexist pigs". Hilariously not true, but when does reality ever intrude on a narrative? Only after a very very long time. And sometimes never.

Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!

Nice.

Thanks, Tena. The last week or so has been horrible for my work schedule. Non-stop interesting news.

user-pic

The issue is vetting, not the pregnancy, not the marriage state, and not the whole tinfoil hat sounding conspiracy about whether Sarah Palin actually gave birth to Trig (seriously, people: that's just nuts).

It's vetting.

Nothing else.

Right, this is all about JUDGEMENT. Sarah Palin's judgement to continue with the process with all the baby activity going on in her life and McCain's JUDGEMENT to not properly vet a person he met once before moving her to VP pick.

user-pic

No it isn't just about McLame. Dammit - this is important. They picked her to appeal to women who were disaffected when Hillary failed to get the nomination.

All women in this country need to know what the hell is going on with this woman who preaches to other women about how they handle their sex lives and their families.

This is damned important.

user-pic
All women in this country need to know what the hell is going on with this woman who preaches to other women about how they handle their sex lives and their families.

Totally agree with this--but the point can be made without referencing anything about the daughter or her pregnancy--because that's a fact that will catch the attention of many people (sadly, far more than, for instance, the state of affairs in Afghanistan", and the Democrats can argue they are in favor of choice, and contraception, and education, without mentioning anything else.

user-pic

CT Voter, it would be nice if the loftiest approach would be used in the exposure of the destructive nature of the small minded pedantry that guides Palin's ship, but it won't be that way.
Unfortunately, if she isn't the blinkered rube naysayers suggest, she knew that she was exposing herself to phenomenal scrutiny.
Having inhabited the state for awhile, I doubt she has a clue. It is a place away and Alaskan's generally have the comfort of that perspective. They think no one is really paying much attention and they live accordingly.
Sorry, but Palin put herself, and her family, front and center for this bombardment. You don't present yourself as squeaky clean and not pique interest.
Palin subscribes to moral relativism...means there is plenty of jackdawed stuff to be revealed.

user-pic

I understand your argument, but if Palin herself is attacked, no matter how richly she deserves it for accepting this offer, it's going to backfire. The media doesn't view Democrats and Republicans equally, and that's patently obvious.

If the Democrats attack Sarah Palin on her judgment, rather than John McCain's judgment, it's going to get turned into "Is it appropriate for Dems to attack a mother of five on her judgment?"

I don't care how reasonable such an attack might be. It's not going to come across that way.

user-pic

I agree that the Robber Baron media will convolute anything for the propaganda machine they run. This doesn't change the fact that salacious smarm is sucked up like an addict's drug of choice. We cannot prevent crooked "angles" being plied to bump up the ratings. It has been pointed out that we have legitimate reasons for concern about the JUDGEMENT involved in the Palin way of managing it.
Palin did say (when pressed on her 'right to life' beliefs) that she would force a minor child of her own to carry a pregnancy to term even in the case of rape. Got to say, I think this is very legitimate territory for examination if the circumstance has come to pass in any array.
There is more than a touch of the Torquemada in a self-righteous "conservative" that needs to have a bucket brigade at the ready. Indeed it has everything to do with her personally.

user-pic

Oh, come on! SHE referenced the daughter's pregnancy!! Why didn't she use her medical records to refute the rumors about the faked pregnancy? Why did she have to drag her pregnant 17 year-old daughter into the national spotlight? Also, she's been shamelessly using 5 month-old trig as a campaign prop.

Aye, and indeed. Obama need do nothing but focus on the issues, and I suspect he will.

You have to admit, though, this is about as juicy as it gets!

user-pic

I am not advocating anything at all for the campaign - I never do.

What Obama does is up to him - he's obviously brilliant at this - I'm not.

But I've been told on this board over and over not to talk about this baby, the pregnancies - that's just nonsense. And the same with bloggers - they are the very ones to start this ball rolling and it's not just an ugly rumor ball - it really matters.

It really does. Had she not chosen "no reproductive right for women under any circumstances" as her extreme position, this issue would not been part of this campaign.

Now, it is, and I do not intend to shutter my defense of women's rights in this regard.

user-pic

I'm not advocating that you, Tena, or anyone else "shutter" anything.

I'm talking about what the Obama campaign and Dems should be saying, or not, and how it's going to portrayed in the media.

user-pic

C'mon, CT. Obama's team is way smarter than that.

If anyone in the Dem party ends up questioning Palin's judgment, it'll be a woman, and that'll defuse the attack somewhat.

But I have a hunch that no one on O's team is going to utter a word about this. They know enough to just stay out of it and let the blogoshpere and the media pick this woman apart.

I don't think anyone anywhere close to the Obama campaign should touch this one. I don't think they should even get close to questions about vetting, or whether Palin as a politician is ready for prime-time.

But many women can get pretty judgmental about other women's family (and work/family) choices, and it will be interesting to see how that plays out over time.

This is a bomb about to explode. Why would Obama even go near it ? In his 60 minutes interview, where the interviewer, being the tool he is, baited him about McCain's choice and he neatly side-stepped it by questioning McCain's judgment without saying about her.

McCain knew first, I guess?

The funny thing to me, is doesn't even matter whether McCain knew going in that Bristol was pregnant or not - either way, it shows an appalling lack of judgment on his part. There's simply no way he comes out of this looking like he knew what he was doing.

The funny thing to me is that it doesn't

PREVIEW FUNCTION PLEASE?

Unrelated post:

Obama keeps 6 point lead in Gallup tracker:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/109954/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Maintains-6Point-Lead-49-43.aspx

This is really getting Eagletonish. The campaign is finding out stuff at about the same pace we are. Not vetting a candidate is a cardinal sin in presidential politics. The punishment should be severe from the national media. It will be interesting to see how comfy that tire swing is now. Holly Bailey, what say you?

http://pufferfish.typepad.com/

but but but James Dobson said she was OK?!?!

And no less an authority than recovering drug addict Rush Limbaugh also vouched for her! I mean, how much vetting do they want?!

user-pic

Rush's marital history and careful eye ("We're the ones with a babe on the ticket") are more relevent here than his history with pain-killers.

Of course, if he's vetting Cindy, it's entirely germane.

I sit corrected!

Actually, the issue is hypocrisy about unwanted pregnancy. Unfortunately, many in the heartland are just as hypocritical. This issue goes hand-in-hand with the hypocrisy of those that don't want abortions available because all life is precious but whole heartedly support the death penalty.

user-pic

Yeah, judgement is the word. That's right in line with Obama's theme all along that it's the judgement not the experience that is most critical.

this ... raises further questions about how thoroughly McCain vetted, and how much he knew, and knows, about the person he selected as his back-up commander-in-chief

Wow, Greg. Excellent point. Thanks for driving it.

All this in three days time. It's all about the vetting.

I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. Senator McCain didn't know Palin's daughter was pregnant.

That means Palin didn't choose to reveal to Senator McCain that her daughter was pregnant, although clearly it's of some concern in a political campaign.

She's dishonest and he's reckless.

If what you say is right (and I agree it probably is), then he's dishonest too.

"Senator McCain didn't know Palin's daughter was pregnant".

And that excuses him how ?

Again, the issue is judgment: McCain's for selecting her without proper vetting; Sarah Palin's for not bowing out gracefully given the shit going on in her life right now.

My very bright sister-in-law (and former Judge) said she thinks there will down the road be a "miscarraige", big time sympathy MSM, and the daughter will just take care of her other child. And why hasn't she already married the father if that is their intent?

I don't give a damn about any of this other than the lying. What irresponsibility by McCain to put this woman as possible VP of the U.S. It is really hard to even fathom.


Yeah thats the rumor now, the father.

This out to be real real interesting.

I wasn't sure how to put it delicately, but that's what I was wondering about. I don't believe, with all the factors involved, that Trig is Sarah's. A birth certificate would have been easy to produce and would not have put her daughter on the spot. So I wonder about a "miscarriage."

Oh I hope not. I had been hoping I'd get to see the touching marriage of two seventeen yeard olds hosted at the McCain Sedona ranch.

Amelie--

Exactly my thought. The family and the campaign seem to be panicking and are making up a cover story as they go along. I expect a "miscarriage" any day now, and then the family and the McCain campaign will assert that it was caused by the pressure created by the commie-librul blogosphere. And, as usual, the credulous press and public will swallow the tall tale.

BTW, if Trig is in fact Sarah's and not Bristol's, it shouldn't be too hard to produce a public appearance photo of the eight-month-pregnant mother. Sarah was certainly out and about, including in Texas. And what about an official photo from Alaska from around the same time? If a genuine photo of Sarah looking eight months pregnant exists, would not the McCain campaign have sought to produce it--or at least Photoshop one--by now?

user-pic

I came here to say the same thing. They're flying by the seat of their pants now, and this is just the next step. If they could, they would have put out a copy of the birth certificate - wouldn't that have been easier than throwing her daughter under the bus?

At this point, all I can do is hope they keep her as the VP candidate. This is awesome entertainment!

user-pic

I came here to say the same thing. They're flying by the seat of their pants now, and this is just the next step. If they could, they would have put out a copy of the birth certificate - wouldn't that have been easier than throwing her daughter under the bus?

At this point, all I can do is hope they keep her as the VP candidate. This is awesome entertainment!

John McCain, under pressure, panicked and made a reckless, irresponsible decision to put in line to be President someone he did not know personally and without vetting the person. Making rash decisions in anger or fear without obtaining all the relevant facts and understanding the consequences of those decisions is not something the President can do without jeopardizing all of America.


What you said.

user-pic

And now a cover-up that is quickly and recklessly thrown together by the handlers? More to come.

I didn't initially believe that Edwards was dumb enough to do what he did.

Nothing surprises me.

It is funny how some people follow different news sources and we look down on the National Enquirer.

But last night I was told that her daughter was pregnant and that there was a scandal, and I just rolled my eyes.

I was also told that there was age of consent issues and more to the story.

I chalked it up to a knee jerk reaction by the left desperate to find an issue, but if the other foot falls on this story, then there is going to be some questions of it there was parental supervision and such...

I feel sorry for the "father and now governor proclaimed husband" of this child. I guess the Alaskan State police can make life difficult if you don't get marred.

It would be better to let these two step up to the microphone and tell-all to avoid the rumors.

"I guess the Alaskan State police can make life difficult if you don't get married."

PLUS! Hope the lucky father doesn't work for the state, or he'll be fired if he gets cold feet!

Yeah this story with the pictures,

http://mediatakeout.s3.amazonaws.com/photo/1220106076palinscandal.jpg

is simply blowing away the hurricane story.

You would think that there would have been a marriage ceremony announced at this point.

I mean that way the two could post a gift-wish-list and get all sorts of stuff.

user-pic
I didn't initially believe that Edwards was dumb enough to do what he did.

Sigh. Good point. Neither did I.

In spite of all the evidence to the contrary, I still labor under the illusion that prominent politicians still can exercise good judgment about personal matters.

Also, did you see THIS??? She is just stupid (Palin)
Courtesy of Daily Kos:

Palin: "If Pledge Of Allegiance Was Good Enough For Founding Fathers, It's Good Enough For Me"
by Hunter
Mon Sep 01, 2008 at 10:15:24 AM PDT

Oh. My. God. Giant hat tip to JLFinch's recommended diary: here's McCain's selection for the Vice Presidency of the United States, Sarah Palin, answering a 2006 policy questionnaire:

Q: Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

PALIN: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance

I don't even know what to say to that... I think the only possible response is a long, drawn out pause, followed by a vigorous beating of your head against the wall.

Fun facts: when John McCain's grandfather graduated from the Naval Academy in 1906, the Pledge of Allegiance, as first written, was only fourteen years old. It would not be made the official pledge of the United States until 1942, six years after John McCain himself was born.

When John McCain was born, the words "Under God" were not in the Pledge. They would not appear there until 1954, during McCain's senior year of high school.

Either McCain's graduating class included Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson (hey, maybe Palin will ask him), or McCain's own vice presidential candidate doesn't know a stick of history -- but still feels perfectly qualified to opine on it anyway. What a completely non-comforting thought.

user-pic

Does this mean that Senator McCarthy gave us "under God" to bicker about? There's irony for you, that that Godforsaken period in our history offered that up.

How about the fact that Sarah Palin, a known publicity and attention seeker. TV sportscaster, and Ms. Alaska contestant, opted not to have a wedding, but instead eloped. Much to the surprise of her own family and all that knew her as a person who craved the type of attention that a big wedding would provide.

Could this be the real reason why the then 24 years old Sarah Palin had a quicky marriage?

In her speech in Dayton today, Gov. Sarah Palin announced that she and her husband are celebrating their 20th wedding anniversary, which means they were married on August 29, 1988.

On April 20, 1989 – less than eight months after they eloped – their first son, Track, was born.

Well what do you expect? Then people live in Igloo's and it's dark 1/2 the year.

There are sociological studies that show that when parents have shotgun marriages or are involved in teen pregnancies, the odds of their children doing the same thing increase by a statistically significant measure.

So while this doesn't prove any of the story, the story certainly would play into this statistic if what some suspect is true.

Bingo.

user-pic

There is so much left behind when the snow melts. Palin is going to be a gift that keeps on giving.
Even right wing Alaskans that I know don't support her for the "heartbeat away" slot. And I think every Alaskan I know is right wing.

So much of this can be laid to rest by simply getting a copy of the birth certificate.

Now if the birth certificate shows Bristol, game over.

But if it shows Palin -- then it should be a simple investigative matter to check if it has been falsified.

Even Palin's alleged abuse of power with the firings came to light and this is far more significant. Such a falsifying would involve many, many people because -- well, the Governor had a baby!

Someone is bound to talk.

user-pic

My sources tell me that Todd Palin is gone all the time, working on the North Slope or playing with his snowmobiles. Sarah is left to deal with the kids and they run the show. The family did not move to Juneau when Sarah became guv because the daughters wanted to stay in Wasilla. So the guv commuted. Massive family dysfunction, kids out of control, so now we see the results. This has turned into a Reality TV show.

I also read that Todd has an "Edwards" problem ............ the words I read, not my quote.

user-pic

Look I'm not advocating anything for Obama and the campaign - I never do.

But for 2 days now I've been told over and over not to talk about the baby, the pregnancies - that's nonsense.

So is saying bloggers shouldn't talk about this - bloggers are the very ones to get this ball rolling and it actually matters.

Isn't vindication sweeeet?

The other side has had no problem talking about angry black woman, Muslim, non-American, poor, living in shack half brother in Kenya, etc. That is okay, but we are to shut up?

Did they shut up about HRC, no, they went on and on. It makes me sick.

Wow, the wheels are just flying off this jalopy. I suspect that Gov. Palin will need to spend more time with her family very soon.

Epic fail, Johnny.

Vote For:

McCAIN/FAILIN' 2008BC

user-pic

Aargh - sorry for the duplicate post.

*sigh*

I wish TPM had a real server instead of an old guy on a bicycle -

Gee, I thought it was a hamster on a wheel.

I've got a tinfoil body cast on now. This whole thing is so absurd, It can't be real. Is McCain being sabotaged? Are they setting up Palin's withdrawal? Would the fanatics accept it?

user-pic

Isn't this wild? I think it's because they are making it up as they go.

Johnny ain't got no plan. The GOP ain't got no plan.

This time it's the Jerry Springer Campaign! Erk! the whole country is sideways.

I keep reminding myself that this woman could become PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

user-pic

Keep reminding everybody else, silver heron.

Yep. The good word must travel through the valleys and hills!

Well I'll believe the Enquirer this time around, again.. nothing shocks me.

I completely discounted the story/rumor last night as jealousy and a dis-information attempt, but so far that source is right.

* * McCain - Palin 08 * *
Giving new meaning to

* * * * Labor Day * * * *

McCain-Plain '08

Teenage pregnancy first

user-pic

I understand John McCain loves shooting craps. Well, he just crapped out.

Is Sara Palin an alien from another galaxy?

I don't know the validity of this website, or the quote for that matter - but if she did indeed say these things, the Obama campaign has to use it in one of their commercials:
http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1520811.page

"Before she was running against him, Sarah Palin—the governor of Alaska and now the Republican candidate for Vice-President of the United States—thought it was pretty neat that Barack Obama was edging ahead of John McCain in her usually solidly red state. After all, she said, Obama’s campaign was using the same sort of language that she had in her gubernatorial race. “The theme of our campaign was ‘new energy,’ ” she said recently. “It was no more status quo, no more politics as usual, it was all about change. So then to see that Obama—literally, part of his campaign uses those themes, even, new energy, change, all that, I think, O.K., well, we were a little bit ahead on that.” She also noted, “Something’s kind of changing here in Alaska, too, for being such a red state on the Presidential level. Obama’s doing just fine in polls up here, which is kind of wigging people out, because they’re saying, ‘This hasn’t happened for decades that in polls the D’ ”—the Democratic candidate—“ ‘is doing just fine.’ To me, that’s indicative, too. It’s the no-more-status-quo, it’s change.”

Interesting, but I doubt now that she will be around long enough to use it. Obama won't...he has bigger and more important fish to fry...

That's a quote from a New Yorker article that just came out. See www.newyorker.com.

That's a quote from a New Yorker article that just came out. See www.newyorker.com.

user-pic

What do we still not know? When is the next development in this soap opera going to happen? Of course, the McCain folks will know all about it. Right?

All in three days over a holiday weekend, bless the InterNutts.

We could be veep vetters! We're consumate pros compared to this Annointment by America's mullahs.

Wasn't it innertubes as per her state's about-to-be-indicted senator stevens ? Does living in the cold all the time makes people become this ?

user-pic

Alaska isn't always cold but it is always far awy from scrutiny. Well, used to be. The good old days seem to be setting with the midnight sun.

user-pic

I wonder if Governor Palin still feels that Clinton was "whining"?

user-pic

I better not hear any whining out of her.

GRrrrrrr - I wish they'd unleash Hillary on her now, while Hill is still mad.

LOL!

This is another reason Hillary's grace last week is terrribly important: she now has the indisputable creds to debark this interloper who would send women back to the 1800s.

"This has turned into a Reality TV show," says cmpnwtr!

AND HOW!!

How much of this is on main stream TV in the States, or we the only ones enjoying the program so much???????? LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!!!

user-pic
I suspect that Gov. Palin will need to spend more time with her family very soon.

Sounds like she should have been spending more time with them before.

user-pic

O yeah and I think you know as well as I do that most American women are going to say the same thing.

Maybe it's anti-feminist, but it's realistic. You cannot be against family planning and have a big ass career too. Somebody has to raise those kids you keep popping out.

The two do not compute - it's either/or. And in the business world, the legal world - she'd really have a hard time finding a job. Them's the facts.

Women like her set us back decades.

Leaving behind the baby with D.S. is just cruel. The daughter throws salt into the wound. There are clearly bigger fish to fry at home.

Deplorable judgement.

Next will learn that Track's the father.

LMAO

My husband said Todd. He is in law enforcement and has seen too much I guess. I said no way, but he just rolled his eyes.

user-pic

I know why your husband said that. I kind of lean towards that view myself, but I've actually kept my mouth shut on that.

It's just way too common -

Tena: Been there to some extent, so I know it is way too common.

Next headline:

Markswoman VP Contender Officiates Shotgun Wedding

Birth control would have been so much easier.

user-pic

Better her than the current VP

Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Stevens's 527 Group

McCain: Of course I knew about this! (Oh god.)

That's big too.

Republicans have to be panicking right now.

user-pic

LOL!

McLame didn't need to duck Gustav - he's getting tsunami'd by Sarah!

roflmao!!!!!!

user-pic

Oh that's beautiful. Her whole "reformer" shtick is getting torpedoed.

And Tsunami Sarah! I love it.

McCain is reaping the whirlwind.

McCain made a quick and poor decision in leaving it up to the ?press? and blogs to vet his VP candidate. And in doing that he left the door open for all sorts of messy investigations and comments.

Governor Palin should pack her family's bags and head home to Alaska. She has a special needs baby to care for and a pregnant teenager to stand beside in the next few months. How can she realistically think she can honestly participate in a stressful national election campaign.

There are times when family values should trump political ambition. Resign, Sarah!

The McCain campaign says they knew about the pregnancy, but this suggests the possibility that they didn't -- and raises further questions about how thoroughly McCain vetted, and how much he knew, and knows, about the person he selected as his back-up commander-in-chief.
But it does speak volumes about his managerial abilities and his judgement.

This isn't the young girl's fault. I'm even willing to say it's not the mother's fault, seeing as she's got so little experience with national politics, and I can see that she might not have known what to expect. But this is all about John McCain, his competence, and his ability to hand the top office in the world.

...handle...

Alaska's abstinence-only education tax dollars at work ladies and gentlemen.

What will the Obama's do when one of their girls get knocked up? Will they encourage them to get married so that the child doesn't grow up a bastard child like Barack. Or will they counsel her to abort the child so that they don't become another statistic?

WTF are you talking about? His daughters are young, dude. You're here, as usual, to make an ass of yourself.

How cruel, given the reality that stares you in the face today, and you have to make shit up.

Well, I'll bet money they won't thrust her into the spotlight and feed her to the wolves in order to cover-up some sort of political problem for her Mother.

It's none of your goddamn business, that's what.

The Obama girls are going to get the information and support they need from their parents to avoid the problem altogether.

user-pic

The Great Unraveling begins.

It's hard to believe what I'm seeing this week - after what was probably the most successful Democratic convention in modern times, we're seeing the GOP convention kick off with rampant non-attendance, a radical re-vamping of their shcedule, with the meat of the first night being tossed to Pickles and Cindy.

The VP candidate Bad News Bag has tipped over and one item after another seems to be falling out on a slow news day.

Pregnancy, DUI, secession, corruption, vendettas - and this is just in the first couple of days after the VP announcement.

I'm half-expecting Wasilla Police to find a body in the Palins' crawl space at this rate.

How do you think Romney, Pawlenty, Ridge, and Lieberman are feeling right about now?

user-pic

Probably figuring they're going to get a second chance.

They're probably all wishing they'd participated more in their local PTAs.

They're probably wondering how James Dobson became the ayatollah of the Republican Party.

What Joe Scarborough really thinks about Palin Nomination!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTbsbeY5k5k

Let's see how they spin it this week.


Devestating.

ASBC's Jake Tapper asks a very good question on his blog, what would the media be saying if BO had a 17 yr old daughter who pregnant? The comments make for interesting reading
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/just-askin.html

Plus, James Dobson from Focus on the Family has already released a statement on the pregnancy and he is blaming the MSM. Lol. The conservative right is in damage control mode.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/dobson-on-brist.html

To Mr and Mrs Plain, welcome to the national spotlight.

user-pic

She wanted it!

IF people feel sorry for poor Bristol for the publicity - don't look at us, look at her mother. She decided to be vice president with this family crisis pending -

Maybe her nomination will get shouted down in St. Paul.

And if Todd has an "Edwards" problem, as Amelie noted, maybe he and McCain can chase babes together.

Which makes me wonder, how big a player do you think McCain was in the Tailhook Association? Can't you just picture him being king of their convention? Has anyone every checked that out?

Absolutely riveting in a trainwreck kinda way...

Sarah Palin's husband has a DUI.

Looks like today is the big news dump day for the McCain camp. They're trying to sneak all this stuff in under the cover of the holiday and the storm.

user-pic

The DUI story is a non-starter. It was 22 years ago. Youthful idiocy. Totally irrelevant.

user-pic

True, Phoebe. All the same, in Alaska they say there is a bar or a church on every other corner. When you're finished with one, walk (don't drive) to the other.

Brilliant.

The holiday weekend blogfest forced McGrandpa to come out and denfend his pick, confirm the juice, and now he can never get out of that crouch.

All dems need to is sadlt "tsk tsk" and move on.

Utterly brilliant. The collpase of the convention meets the collapse of McPastit's first decision as veep.

What will the MSM do with this?

Hanna will be making landfall as a CAT 1 in Savanna, GA the night McWHAT?!? gives his speech. Savanna has not seen a storm in many a year, and her tall old trees will be swaying...

Pack yer bags, Greg's got a new thread.

Hoo boy.

While I'm still struggling to be nonjudgmental, I have to say, this story is going to legs.

The first thing is the vetting, and what it says about McCain. But the other thing is that it's going to intersect -- in the public mind -- with Troopergate. Because that too is a "family drama."

I do think -- when all of this is taken together -- it could create the impression that McCain-Palin is a risky choice.

I'm just running over the optics of it all in my mind.

Democratic convention: people playing "Love Train," soaring rhetoric, cute little girls, fireworks.

Republican convention: hurricanes, unwed teenage mothers, questions about rash judgment being raised by the media . . . phrases like "perfect storm" getting tossed around by smartass pundits.

Hoo boy.

The only negative here is that the MSM narrative picks up a Obama is doing a whisper campaign just Rove did to McCain in 2000. Not that this would spell doom for Obama but it could be a distraction for him.

Tena, you have totally won me over.

1. Sarah Palin has failed her daughter on SO many levels.

2. Sarah Palin has also thrown McCain under the bus. She IS a barracuda.

3. Sarah Palin's beliefs are only for OTHER women.

4. I am insulted by her. I am a mother, and she just turns my stomach for how little regard she has for her children. Bristol looks so SAD in all the pix.......wonder why?

5. She will NOT be on the ballot on election day, as I said yesterday.

Sshe deserves everything she gets......

heh. long long overdue schadenfreude....wheeeeeeeee!!!!

user-pic

Sarah Palin smiles a lot, very much like Cindy McCain. She has that beauty pageant contestant smile that never varies, and so she was a beauty pageant contestant as was Cindy McCain, and it bothers me. She's been thrust into the national arena, and she cannot seem to vary that smile, at least in the photos and TV I've seen. She didn't "hit the ground running" because she isn't ready for Prime Time Foreign Policy and so didn't appear on Sunday's political talk shows. The smile, that smile, it bothers me. How in the world does anyone expect a Hillary supporter to vote for an anti-abortion candidate like Palin? is a question that puzzles me. I suspect, under the smile, she is ruthless as her nickname "Barracuda" seems to imply, and that would mask any real emotion and any real open reaction.

Whatever happened to the argument that McCain made about Obama, that he didn't have experience? If Obama didn't have experience, Palin has even less and she's a heartbeat away from the Presidency with McCain who is 72 and has had cancer. So McCain has "flip-flopped", I repeat "flip-flopped" on that issue. Don't try covering up with her so-called experience as governor of Alaska, or mayor of a small town, or PTA leader, because it's obvious that she has No, repeat, NO foreign policy experience. So McCain flip-flops again.

The sloppy way McCain chose this woman. He met with her once, face to face, and didn't even properly vet her to discover that she was embroiled in a state investigation about her possible misuse of power. Evidently the only thing that mattered was (1) her gender) and (2) her staunch opposition to pro-choice. This was not a "considered" choice, it was a last-minute attempt to cover the criticism McCain was getting from the right-to-life conservatives. It was a "gamble" to try to (3) pick up the Hillary voters, which I suspect will fail badly. So McCain shores up his base and still loses.

And the latest... Her daughter, 17, unmarried, pregnant. Makes you kind of sick, doesn't it? First, they talk about right-to-life values, nothing about chastity before marriage. Then they, under pressure, announce the daughter, unmarried, at seventeen is pregnant. Shows you the kind of values she was brought up with by her mother and father, doesn't it? Then they claim it's private; what's private about running for Vice President, maybe President? This reflects badly on the so-called family values that this woman supposedly stands for.
Also shows how carefully McCain's campaign "vets" their choices. If they knew about it, it's damning. If they didn't, it's just as bad.

I believe in a woman's right to choose, the right to work and raise a family, the right to set out on your own career, but the part that makes me most concerned is if your choice has a negative effect on your kids. She "chose" to have 5 kids, one born with DS, and she "chose" to run for governor, and she "chose" to accept a VP position with both an infant in need and a teenage daughter in need. Who is taking care of these kids? One parents in Junea, and soon trapping all over the country, and one parent is in the Bay half time. I would think this concept would be an issue with many women; conservative or liberal on the feminist front. Being a mother to me means usually lots of sacrifice for your kids....and I have to say I am confused by this womans maternal "choices".

Something is very fishy here.

Real reporters better get to the bottom of this. It just doesn't make sense to me. It doesn't add up that this girl is suddenly "5 months pregnant".

Something is very fishy here.

Real reporters better get to the bottom of this. It just doesn't make sense to me. It doesn't add up that this girl is suddenly "5 months pregnant".

user-pic

These "rumors" have been flying in Alaska for awhile. Ordinarily, nobody but the sourdoughs and cheechakos care.

So,

1. Palin's press secretary says he had no evidence she was pregnant as of two days ago.
2. Top McCain adviser Steve Schmidt now says that Palin told McCain about it last week.
3. Other McCain aides say he knew about it before that from the "lengthy vetting process".

Who is the liar?

Will someone please read one of Dobson's books on parenting here at TPM and tell us if he would approve of Palin's lifestyle (absentee parenting)? Hint: He don't.) And then ask Dobson, given his expertise in parenting, why he thinks Palin is doing the right thing, and why other evangelicals should support the ticket, given his professional views about parenting.

Seems like there's a rich vein here for the mining.

Will someone here at TPM please read one of Dobson's books on parenting and tell us if he would approve of Palin's lifestyle (absentee parenting)? (Hint: He doesn't.) And then ask Dobson, given his professional expertise in parenting, why he thinks Palin is doing the right thing by running for VP, and why other evangelicals should support the ticket, given his professional evangelical views about parenting and the welfare of the children.

Seems like there's a rich vein here for the mining.

user-pic

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=179257&title=tim-kaine

A reminder about the difference between an Obama vetting and his opponent's method.

user-pic

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=179257&title=tim-kaine

A reminder about the difference between an Obama vetting and his opponent's method.

For example:

QUESTION: Everyone knows that divorce is tough on children. What about parent-child separation that occurs for reasons other than divorce? Is the pain any less intense for kids when a parent has a good reason to be away?

DR. DOBSON: Research confirms that the consequences of any parent-child separation can be severe. In one study of fathers whose jobs required them to be away from their families for long periods of time, the children tended to experience numerous negative reactions, including anger, rejection, depression, low self-esteem and, commonly, a decline in school performance. Those findings have been confirmed in other contexts as well.

Some of those conclusions were presented at a White House conference at which I spoke a few years ago. The other speaker was Dr. Armand Nicholi, professor of psychiatry at Harvard University. That day, Dr. Nicholi explained how family circumstances that make parents inaccessible to their children produce some of the same effects as divorce itself.

Cross-cultural studies make it clear that parents in the United States spend less time with their children than almost any other nation in the world. For decades, millions of fathers have devoted themselves exclusively to their occupations and activities away from home. More recently, mothers have joined the work force in huge numbers, rendering themselves exhausted at night and burdened with domestic duties on weekends. The result: No one is at home to meet the needs of millions of lonely preschoolers and latchkey children.

story continues below
advertisement

Dr. Nicholi expressed regret that his comments would make many parents feel uncomfortable and guilty. However, he felt obligated to report the facts as he saw them. Most important (and the point of his address), Dr. Nicholi stressed the undeniable link between the interruption of parent-child relationships and the escalation of psychiatric problems that we were then seeing, and that are even more pronounced today. If the numbers of dysfunctional families and absentee parents continued to escalate, he said, serious national health problems were inevitable.

For example:

QUESTION: Everyone knows that divorce is tough on children. What about parent-child separation that occurs for reasons other than divorce? Is the pain any less intense for kids when a parent has a good reason to be away?

DR. DOBSON: Research confirms that the consequences of any parent-child separation can be severe. In one study of fathers whose jobs required them to be away from their families for long periods of time, the children tended to experience numerous negative reactions, including anger, rejection, depression, low self-esteem and, commonly, a decline in school performance. Those findings have been confirmed in other contexts as well.

Some of those conclusions were presented at a White House conference at which I spoke a few years ago. The other speaker was Dr. Armand Nicholi, professor of psychiatry at Harvard University. That day, Dr. Nicholi explained how family circumstances that make parents inaccessible to their children produce some of the same effects as divorce itself.

Cross-cultural studies make it clear that parents in the United States spend less time with their children than almost any other nation in the world. For decades, millions of fathers have devoted themselves exclusively to their occupations and activities away from home. More recently, mothers have joined the work force in huge numbers, rendering themselves exhausted at night and burdened with domestic duties on weekends. The result: No one is at home to meet the needs of millions of lonely preschoolers and latchkey children.

story continues below
advertisement

Dr. Nicholi expressed regret that his comments would make many parents feel uncomfortable and guilty. However, he felt obligated to report the facts as he saw them. Most important (and the point of his address), Dr. Nicholi stressed the undeniable link between the interruption of parent-child relationships and the escalation of psychiatric problems that we were then seeing, and that are even more pronounced today. If the numbers of dysfunctional families and absentee parents continued to escalate, he said, serious national health problems were inevitable.