« Palin Hits Campaign Trail, Keeps Up Attacks On Obama | Home | DNC Spending Half A Million Dollars To Hit McCain With Michigan Ad »

Polls Show McCain Starting To Get Convention Bounce

John McCain might just be starting to get a convention bounce in the wake of Sarah Palin's fiery convention speech, according to today's tracking polls -- though he still trails Barack Obama for now.

Today's Rasmussen number: Obama 48%, McCain 46%, within the ±2% margin of error. Yesterday, when all the sampling predated Palin's speech, Obama was ahead 50%-45%.

Today's Gallup number: Obama 48%, McCain 44%, with a ±2% margin of error. Yesterday, Obama was up 49%-42%.

These three-day tracking polls include one day of samples from after Palin's speech, but they entirely predate McCain's address last night, which was on the lackluster side in comparison with Palin's effort. It won't be until Monday that we get polls that are completely made up of data from after the Republican convention.


133 Comments

| Leave a comment

Here we go again.

Jonze,

Eric, is just doing his job...lol

user-pic

Until they start identifying not only the size of the polling sample but the method of contact (land line, cell, text message) I'm not worried.

PEACE

I am with you on this. I have many friends, about 70% who no longer have land lines. That makes a huge difference in polling.

You don't even know how many young people were in the sample of these land-line owners. Why make a snarky comment then?

but you can't be happy when obama is doing good in the polls, and then when hes not doing good, suddenly think that polls don't matter.

Who The Hell Is John Bush?

For those who are interested, Nate Silver's got a great analysis of the tracking polls and the convention bump over at 538.com:

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/crackin-trackin-poll.html

For those of you who don't follow the link: Obama had a huge polling day on Monday which cycled out of Rasmussen's sample today.

Also, I'll believe a RNC bounce when I see McCain at 47 or better in Rasmussen, or 46 or better in Gallup (his personal highs in both; Obama's personal bests are four points better in both cases).

Thanks so much for sharing the link. It was a good piece--truly excellent in some areas.

I am personally still sore at her, and will likely remain so, after that hit piece in the NYT earlier this year, but those are my personal feelings. That she's bringing clarity and truth about who is truly on the side of women and doing so publicly is most important, and I applaud her for doing so.

user-pic
It won't be until Monday that we get polls that are completely made up of data from after the Republican convention.

Yet here we are. Also, what was the line on McCain's "bounce"? Did the Dems manage to set any expectation level? Sounds to me like McCain will break even (i.e. back to where he started) when the numbers come in.

Typical convention bounce is 5-6 points over pre-convention polling, peaking on the weekend immediately after the convention. The tightly-spaced VP announcements and conventions have scrambled the numbers a bit, though.

user-pic

It seems to me that they're going to basically end back up where they started before the conventions. If they were at around 46-46 before the conventions and afterwards they're at around 48-46 I'd call it a wash.

I think the only things that have come out of the conventions are that Obama/Michelle were able to present themselves as less "scary" and McCain shored-up his Republican base.

Also (maybe) helped heal some of the wounds of the Democratic primary?

user-pic

Good point. I think Bill and Hillary went a long way to help heal some primary wounds. I'm anxious to see if Hillary continues that trend.

user-pic

yup, just like McCain annealed the base back in. Now that the convention hype's over, we can get down to business.

The same Republican base that he was pretty much at his ceiling in before convention season, and which is badly outnumbered by the Democratic base that Obama consolidated during his own convention, right?

user-pic

Yes, I was mainly refering to the fundie, nutter Republican base that wasn't very enthusiastic about McCain. I think that Palin gave them an excuse to vote for McCain rather than staying home. I'm curious as to how the numbers play out within the self-identified Republicans.

Typical convention bounce is 5-6 points over pre-convention polling, peaking on the weekend immediately after the convention. The tightly-spaced VP announcements and conventions have scrambled the numbers a bit, though.

There's a great post analyzing and estimating each day's numbers at fivethirtyeight.com

MSNBC just reported that the Alaskan legislature is moving up its Troopergate investigation to Sept 12. Thats next week Friday.

This makes one point clear. Gov Plain made many enemies on her way up on the Dem and Rep side, now they are salivating at the chance to bury her. In other words, what goes around, comes around. Plus when you spit in the media's face, they spit back. The media is going to focus on this.

The crap is about to hit the fan.

The ABC report says it's moving up three weeks -- so Oct. 10 (or thereabouts) instead of Oct. 31.

The ABC report says it's moving up three weeks -- so Oct. 10 (or thereabouts) instead of Oct. 31.

MSNBC also says Oct 10:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032553/

user-pic

The legislators' meeting on September 12 is to issue subpoenas for the investigation; October 10 is the date the investigation is expected to be completed.

Another spectacular flop is about to hit the Democrats in the face over the TrooperGate.

A Democratic Senator who heads this commision ALREADY SAID that the report will be damaging to Palin. He also said she was a terrible pick for a VP.

It will take exactly 5 seconds for the Republicans to claim this is politically motivated and generate another backlash.

This idiocy doesn't cease to amaze me.

You got a full quote and a source. Please?

of course they would not have attacked the report otherwise, right?

What they say doesn't matter. That they say something and then hammer away with their talking points is how they shape the debate.

Why should we start Chicken Littleing when we could, I don't know, fight back?

So let's fight back by hammering them with the point that it is a bipartisan commission, following Alaska rules and procedures, and the result was obvious enough from the start that EVERYBODY INVOLVED could predict it would be a negative report.

Politically motivated...was the Lewinsky brouha headed by Ken Starr politically motivated? Does it matter?

Facts are facts. If their investigation yields evidence that Palin had this individual fired for personal reasons, that information needs to come out. And if that information proves to be inconvenient for the McCain/Palin ticket, they'll have to deal with that. That's what vetting is supposed to be for - to prepare the campaign to deal w/circumstances such as these, should they arise.

And the voters will make their judgments accordingly.

Obama's ceiling is 50-51%. If McCain can't get to 47-48% then McCain is screwed as his ceiling has been 44%.

I don't think McCain is going to get to the 47-48% that he needs and as bad as the CBS news poll was, McCain could only get to 42%.

MSNBC's Schuster is discussing Troopergate, and treating is both a vetting issue and as a problem with her governing style.

Excellent. If she won't present herself for questioning, the press is writing her narrative for her.

CNN was discussing 'Troopergate' this morning. Seriously, Palin could be gone before November.

No, she's not going anywhere now. McCain's right would eviscerate him. They didn't get one of their own this close just to allow some guy that they don't like to remove her. Also, it would be admitting a mistake, and that's something that Republicans as a whole are simply unable to do.

Unless she's in jail, or she gets caught with a Vietnamese tranny hooker, John McCain will go to war with her, and take his chances.

That's fine by me.

Another great post from commenter Frank of 538 which analyzes Obama's Gallup bounce.

The Gallup weekly crosstabs allow for some insight in the composition of Obama's convention bounce.

http://www.gallup.com/tag/Election%2bTrends%2bby%2bGroup.aspx

Overall, from Aug 18-24 to Auf 25-31 he gained 3 pts (45 zo 48), while McCain lost 3 pts (45 to 42) in the weekly Gallup aggregate. The August 25-31 period included 2 poor pre-convention days for Obama, and 2 days following the Palin announcement, so it should reflect more of a 'bounce average' than the bounce peak.

Essentially, Obama's convention bounce has come from the following demographics:

- Democrats (up from 78-14 to 85-9). there is hardly movement among independents (43-42 to 44-41) and Repubs (7-87 to 8-99), which may to some extent reflect initial effects of the Palin announcement.
More specifically, Obama has mostly gained amomg conservative Dems (from 63-26 to 77-15), and just slightly from moderate and liberal Dems, which already had been relatively firmly at his side.

- Voters over 50: There has been an 8 pt shift (from 40-47 to 44-43) among voters over 65 years old, and a 7 pr shift (from 44-44 to 49-42) in the 50-64 age group. In the 30-49 age group, the shift was only 4 pt (45-46 to 48-45), while there was no change for voters below 30.

- Non-graduates: While college and postgraduates hardly moved, there was a 12 pt shift for voters with 'some college' (42-47 to 49-42), and a 5 pt shift for 'high shool or less' (42-45 to 45-43).

- Non-Blacks: Obama gained net 5 pt from whites (37-52 to 40-50) and 13 pt from Hispanics (58-31 to 64-24). The latter gain, however, should not be over-interpreted, as the Hispanic vote is traditionally showing strong fluctuations in the Gallop weekly aggregates, from as low as 54% for Obama (Aug 4-10) up to 68% (July 21-28). Not surprisingly, Blacks did hardly move, as being already firmly on Obama's side.

Gender did not make a difference (for both sexes, Obama gained net 6 points), nor did church attendance.

In short, it appears that the bounce has mainly come from getting Clinton (& Reagan?) Democrats back into Obama's column, where many of them already had been during late June, early July.

What is interesting is a regional analysis: The bounce has been strongest in the Midwest (from 44-45 to 50-40) and in the South (from 39 -51 to 44 - 48), while hardly appearing in the East (52-37 to 54-37) and the West (48-43 to 49-42). Moreover, it has been strongest in "Red States" (from 39-51 to 43-47), while there was only minor movement in "Purple States" (from 46-44 to 48 -44) and "Blue States" (53-37 to 55-36). Looking at these regional patterns, OH and CO will probably continue to be nail-biters, while states like FL, NC, and in particular parts of the "red mid-west" (MT, ND, IN) should be extremely interesting to be watched the next weeks (provided some of the Dem convention bounce can be sustained).

It looks like at best he will pull back to right where he was before the election. And it isn't just a convention bounce, but the Palin bounce as well. As the conventions fade, and the truth about becomes more real to the independents, the likelihood he'll remaining hovering in the 42 to 44% range.

The head of the republican state senate and house both said, Palin is not qualified to be vice president. Andrew Sulivan and NEQ are reportedly looking into Todd Palin's former business partners divorce records regarding Sarah Palin's alleged affair. The walls are starting crumble around Palin.

The head of the Alaskan republican state senate and house both said, Palin is not qualified to be vice president. Andrew Sulivan and NEQ are reportedly looking into Todd Palin's former business partners divorce records regarding Sarah Palin's alleged affair. The walls are starting crumble around Palin.

Lol, Andrew Sullivan applied to legally change his name to Michelle Malkin II.

One can only hope.

I just can't get over the stupidity of Americans. These are the same people that gave us 8 years of George W. Bush, when his phoniness was readily apparent.

That Palin's mean-spirited, empty speech could generate a bounce in the polls is very troublesome.

It shows that people still care more about who is "down home" like them, than who has the brains to be president.

When did elite ('the best') become a bad word?

Thank you for saying this. I am beginning to believe that either I or this country is insane. Since when do we disparage people who are intelligent, well-educated, and work hard to master something? What are we doing to ourselves?!

Thank you for saying this. I am beginning to believe that this country is insane. Since when do we disparage people who are intelligent, well-educated, and work hard to master something? What are we doing to ourselves?!

A doctor friend of mine carried out a study in rural Niger, in Africa. She claimed it was the most conservative place she'd ever been.

Men are raised to believe that they're rough, tough, and perfect in every way. They receive the closest to a balanced diet that anyone in the community gets, essentially by simply taking the best of the available food and not thinking twice. The idea that a man should dirty himself with work is almost unheard of. So who does the work, the farming and the building? Funny you should ask...

Women are nearly slaves, and their meals consist of whatever the men leave over. They are kept down by being divided among themselves; women who try to change the status quo are attacked furiously by (usually older) women who didn't get a break themselves, so jealously live to make sure no other woman can. Putting uppity, progressive women in their place is the only triumph these older women will ever have, so they relish it, regardless of the greater effect on the community.

The result of sexism: poverty, because the women do all their work to keep the men alive; since the men aren't doing anything themselves, no work is done toward producing products for the community to sell elsewhere.

When an outsider asks average people from this society what's wrong with them, the ignorant men think everything's just great, while the women fearfully agree. Should anyone complain, they're accused by others of being killjoys, disloyal, or bitter.

There we go.

user-pic

I think it was Rob Riggle on last night's Daily Show that best summed up the attitude of the American public towards our leaders, "We want them to be the same as us - or worse."

user-pic

I'm betting the faith-based formerly lukewarm McCain supporters don't mind the fact that Palin could end up as President, inexperience and all. As it was said, it's not a bug, it's a feature.

Man, I am really nervous. %45 of people think Mccain/Palin is what America needs. What does that say about America? Bush is floating around at unthinkable approval ratings, but people somehow think McCain is different. McCain is old enough, he should know the phrase, "you can't teach an old dog new tricks"

The only change he is going to make is a pair of depends.

A little perspective, please. If McCain got 45% of the vote in the general, it would represent one of the most catastrophic defeats in the history of the country.

No, just since 1936, Landon, Wilkie, Stevenson (1952 &1956), Goldwater, McGovern, Carter, and Mondale all failed to crack 45%. Landon, Goldwater, and McGovern couldn't crack 40%. In other words, in half the 18 elections since 1936, the loser has gotten less than 45%.

I think it says that Obama needs a clearer message, and needed a clearer, more targeted convention.

I don't think that enough was said about the extremism of the Bush years. Very little mention of Iraq or terrorism.

They are really counting on the economy to be the issue, but that is not what elections turn on.

I wonder if after McCain's weak speech last night if we'll need to introduce a new term: convention dip.

I prefer "convention thud".

"plummet"

Eric, I hate to be rude, but you guys have shown over and over that you don't know how to read, and use a poll. You never dig into the crosstabs when they're available, and you often draw wild and offbase conclusions about what the results of a polls reflect. I'm saying this for your own good.

Stop. Obsessing. About. Polls.

Please. Especially these tracking polls, which are just ridiculous. They have their place, but almost never in the context that you give them. By all means, continue to bring us polls, especially any relevant state polls as they become available. But please, stop drawing conclusions for us. You're very bad at it.

Man, I am really nervous. %45 of people think Mccain/Palin is what America needs. What does that say about America? Bush is floating around at unthinkable approval ratings, but people somehow think McCain is different. McCain is old enough, he should know the phrase, "you can't teach an old dog new tricks"

The only change he is going to make is a pair of depends.

If You Want To Keep Your Beer Cold, Place It Next To Sarah Barracuda's Heart....YUP! YUP!

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/if-you-want-to-keep-your-beer.php

One should note that a very good day for Obama dropped off of both polls today. I think someone calculated that Obama actually gained 2% from Wednesday to Thursday in Gallap, from +3% to +5%.

I'm not sure how reliable that math is, since I'm not sure how easy it is to infer individual day numbers.

Sarah Palin is an image, not a running mate. She speaks in speeches and talking points written for her by the campaign and is never going to be allowed to do interviews unless they are power puff types like The View or Rachel Ray that don't talk about issues.

McCain will be able to break even. Maybe.

Obama was able to pull out in front by 8 points at one time.

Only one candidate has the numbers on their side.

Erik: you missed the poll for Alaska:

The Headline should be Pittbull wins Alaska for McWar...


This might throw just a bit of a damper on the otherwise (marginally) rising fortunes of the McGramps/Barracuda ticket:

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5734511&page=1

Barack needs to seal the deal at the debates. He can and he WILL!

It should be noted that Sullivan is not the one looking into the records of the divorce of the ex partner. He only posted that the ex business partner had tried to seal them and had not been successful. This story is being driven by the National Enquirer.

I'm begining to think that Eric is a Rovian plant on TPM. Sort of like a certain McCain interviewee instead going to AP and running their political coverage. ;)

The bounce was supposed to happen, but the unemployment numbers ans the return of Troopergate will put things back to normal.

But I want to leave a question in the open: Can McCain's awful speech affect his convention bounce?

McCain-Palin'08: A POW and a barracuda!

The bounce was supposed to happen, but the unemployment numbers ans the return of Troopergate will put things back to normal.

But I want to leave a question in the open: Can McCain's awful speech affect his convention bounce?

McCain-Palin'08: A POW and a barracuda!

Unfortunately, some of that 45% are made up of people like my father. The man LOATHES Bush and regularly rails against the GOP for their theocratic leanings, budget largess, imprudent foreign policy (in his better days he was an old-fashioned realist ala Eisenhower), yet he voted for Bush twice and plans to vote for McCain. The only way he's able to do so is by COMPLETELY ignoring the news. He will literally walk out of the room when anything GOP-related is on the news so he doesn't have to hear it and can vote for them this fall. He's not your typical low-information voter either; he's a retired scientist with a PhD in chemistry from Stanford. The problem is that he's way too prideful to vote for anybody else because it would be truly admitting the GOP (and by extension, himself) was wrong. He won't even vote Libertarian to protest.

What's even more frustrating is that he openly admits our current economic policy (engineered by the GOP) is slowly bankrupting the country and will lead to extreme hardship for his grandchildren.

We're not really on speaking terms now because I told him he's personally responsible (since he agrees our policies are ruining the country) for destroying the lives of his grandchildren because he's too fucking prideful. I also told him "to take off his fucking flag pin, because, via his actions he's a traitor to his nation and doesn't deserve the honor of wearing it. Yeah, I'm a disrespectful son, but the stakes are too high to not speak frankly. It won't make a difference though.

Like I said; my subjective judgment is that there are A LOT of people like him out there.

I'm trying to imagine who the left-wing equivalent is to her and if the Democratic cadidate were to pull a stunt like this, would I jump ship...

I think I would b/c national security is national security, etc. and the fringe on either side is a ticket to nowheresville.

For me it would be (and I know a lot of people here will disagree with me) somebody like Dennis Kucinich.

I'll preface my dislike of Kucinich by also saying the following: He strikes me as a decent man (which is more than you can say about most of the GOP), I just think his policies are bunk.

You describe 90% of those to whom I am personally related, though the same 90% no longer enjoys my company.

It's this willingness to be dumb that this tiny world can no longer afford.

user-pic

That's one person - your father.

There are people like that alright - but they are not a majority.

They can't be - because:

We won big in '06 - god. fucking. damn. it.

user-pic

I`m going to focus on the voting machines that we seem to have forgotten about.Is anyone tracking that scene?

Greg Palast is the eagle eye in that department.

http://www.gregpalast.com/

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

If you include the Diageo/Hotline daily tracking poll which includes Palin's speech, which has Obama at 46 and McCain at 40(!), it doesn't look like much of a bounce to me.

If McCain can't crack 48%-50% by Monday we can put a fork in him.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

McCain Beat Obama in Ratings

http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080905/pl_bloomberg/ae1brfgubhjs_1

Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, Nielsen Media Research said.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Democratic nominee Barack Obama last month. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, McCain's vice presidential running mate, drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

Great news for Obama.

That means 38.9 million people saw that miserable green screen speech.

Funny, the NFL game which ended before the speech had 13.6 million viewers on NBC, with 8.1 million on NBC watching the McCain speech.

Can't call them all leftovers, but it's certainly safe to assume a LOT of them were.

Obama Beats McCain In New Diageo/Hotline Poll: Obama 46%, McCain 40%, undecided 10%


September 5, 2008

New York, NY – The Diageo/Hotline Daily Tracker Poll, conducted by FD, is a new daily
tracking poll that is being conducted from September 2, 2008 until Election Day, November 4,
2008. The poll is being conducted via telephone among a random, nationally representative
sample of registered voters, age 18 and older. FD
is interviewing no fewer than 300
registered voters nationwide each day up to Election Day. Results will be released daily,
Monday through Friday.

Today’s results are based on combined data from Sept 2 to Sept 4, 2008, with n=916
registered voters (margin of error +/- 3.2%), and a subsample of n=877 likely voters (margin
of error +/- 3.3%).


http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/Tracker/Diageo%20Hotline%20Tracker%20release%20-%2009%2005%20final.pdf

Obama Beats McCain In New Diageo/Hotline Poll: Obama 46%, McCain 40%, undecided 10%


September 5, 2008

New York, NY – The Diageo/Hotline Daily Tracker Poll, conducted by FD, is a new daily
tracking poll that is being conducted from September 2, 2008 until Election Day, November 4,
2008. The poll is being conducted via telephone among a random, nationally representative
sample of registered voters, age 18 and older. FD
is interviewing no fewer than 300
registered voters nationwide each day up to Election Day. Results will be released daily,
Monday through Friday.

Today’s results are based on combined data from Sept 2 to Sept 4, 2008, with n=916
registered voters (margin of error +/- 3.2%), and a subsample of n=877 likely voters (margin
of error +/- 3.3%).


http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/Tracker/Diageo%20Hotline%20Tracker%20release%20-%2009%2005%20final.pdf

I think we have a record - octuple posting.

LOL

user-pic

Two words: Electoral College!!!!

Tracking polls are sort of a fun parlor game (does anyone even have a parlor anymore let alone play games in them?) but they really don't help us any. The big question is what has been the impact of the conventions on the swing states?

So what if McCain has sewn up the right wing conservative Republicans? This election will be determined by moderates and independents; people who believe in science, books, education, economic opportunity, and international leadership.

In which swing state did McCain help himself with his convention? Alaska - which has never been a swing state before. In which swing states did Obama help himself during the Dem convention? Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Montana, Virginia, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and New Hampshire.

Let them try to hide Palin; it won't help. McCain's speech was a flub.

user-pic

I think Palin may - may - have helped - and it will likely be short-term help - in states like Montana, Nevada, and Colorado. Not with women but with men. She may help a little in Ohio as well. She might hurt McCain in Florida. The other states you listed, I agree...she probably didn't help. And McCain did himself no favors.

She came across as an establishment outsider and Westerners like that. McCain is "from" the West but he's not a Westerner. She is. She shoots, she eats bloody red meat, her husband races snow mobiles - a hot, rugged, tough and straight talking gal with a gun. (I'd personally debate the "straight talking" part but I know she lied through most of her speech - a lot folks won't immediately know that) You know there are plenty of guys living in MT and CO and NV who eat that shit up.

Now, once they realize she's an inexperienced and potentially corrupt wackadoodle hand-picked by the Rove wing of the GOP, they may change their minds. But I think you'll see a number of McCain friendly polls coming out of NV, CO, MT, the Dakotas, and maybe Ohio in the next couple of weeks. She may also help him in the more rural areas of Washington and Oregon, although nowhere near enough to put McCain in striking range in either state. Her appeal may not last, but it will be there. If it does last and Obama has to basically write off the non-coastal West (except for NM), we're back to OH and FL, with VA probably the only other major state that Obama will be in the position to flip. And he'd need one of them.

Of course, you would hope the new Palin fans will wake up after the luster fades and they remember that they are actually voting for McCain, not Palin. And you hope that they realize that Palin is a religious wingnut dressed up in populist reformer's clothing. But the media has to do its job. And so do the voters. Let's hope in 2008 we have an electorate like the one that went to the polls in 2006, not like the one that voted in 2004.

I'm begining to think that Eric is a Rovian plant on TPM. Sort of like a certain McCain interviewee instead going to AP and running their political coverage. ;)

A dead heat. Within the margin of error.

Exactly as I predicted.

I have to say fogu I miss your avatars. The one of Hillary giving the finger was just fab.

I miss the avatars too, because it was easier to spot a troll and skip over/ignore them.

With respect, so what? This hardly makes you unique. I predicted a close race months ago as well. So did CT Voter. So did Tena X. So did NC Steve. This seems a rather small accomplishment, rather akin to predicting hurricanes in August or snow in Buffalo in January.

I will do you one better - the tracking polls in Sept of 2012 will be close, as will the tracking polls in Sept of 2016. Mark it down now folks, you heard it here first (not because I am possessed of any unique insights, but simply because any fool can predict the regular and predictable).

Well, several have posters have said I'm always wrong. And one promised not to ever post again if it turned out to be the dead heat I predicted after the conventions.

To be fair, you did make about a million Hillary-related predictions that were dead wrong.

Details, details.

:)

And just for fun I'll remind you of one other predication.

I said that if Palin kills it McCain's Speech will be irrelevant and,
if Palin holds her own against Biden or bitch slaps him (yes, I said that), then McCain will win the election.

Unfortunately we'll have to wait a bit to see if I'm once again correct.

Actually, if you recall I said FL and MI would be counted and you said no way.

I was right, you were wrong.

Unfortunately Dean being a Obama shill engineered a half count. If they were counted in full I suspect Clinton might be the nominee right now.

I honestly have no idea. So, ok.

Ah, well I hope that fellow presently regrets such a silly promise, because any fool ought to have expected such a state of affairs at this stage in the game.

One poll where McShame is still behind does not bring the results to a dead heat! Shame on you for posting fogu2...

So you're a liar. There are threwe polls right now that have them in a statistical dead heat.

You...are...a...liar.

Uh, speaking as someone who does statistics all damn day long, there is no such thing as a "statistical dead heat". A lead is a lead. All the error bars tell you is your percent confidence in that lead.

Uh, speaking as someone who does statistics all damn day long, there is no such thing as a "statistical dead heat". A lead is a lead. All the error bars tell you is your percent confidence in that lead.

So you're a liar. There are three polls right now that have them in a statistical dead heat. GAllup, Rasmussen and CBS

You...are...a...liar.

Still hurts doesn't it.

I am glad that many viewers saw how bad McCain is.

It's good that so many people got to see McCain's speech. It was vague and wandering and made him look weak.

It's good that so many people got to see McCain's speech. It was vague and wandering and made him look weak.

My father is a lifelong Republican in his 60s who thinks George W Bush has been a disaster -- especially the recklessness when it comes to war, spending, and broad issues of national decency (torture, habeas corpus, undiplomatic international arrogance.) He actually voted for Kerry in 2004. Yet he'll almost certainly vote for McCain in 2008.

One, because he truly believes McCain is different from Bush.

But another of the major reasons is that Barack Obama is just too exotic for him in some gut-level way. I think we underestimate how stuck in old assumptions and perceptions older people can be. For many who grew up in the 50s and early 60s, the idea that a black man named Barack Obama could be elected president, and could be trusted once he was, is still an odd one.

Yup, my father kept telling me (right after Iowa) that Americans are simply not ready to elect a black man. Of course, by "Americans" he was clearly referring to himself but can't quite admit that.

Here's the real kicker: My parents live in Colorado, so it's that much more important!

The good news is that my mom called me the other night and said (with no prompting from me) that she liked the fact that Palin stood her own (she doesn't want to see one of the first women in her position humiliated, unlike me), but she came off as incredibly petty, way too partisan and very mean-spirited. After that speech she said all of her female friends are voting for Obama. These are all women in their 60s, so it's certainly good news. Especially in Colorado!

user-pic

I don't doubt this is a factor. I only hope the under 35 crowd comes out in large enough numbers to overcome this. I know my demographic - the 35-49 crew - will likely go for McCain. My peeps grew up during the Reagan era and most think it was a swell time. I think a lot of them still want to be Gordon Gekko - most of them missed Stone's point...Gekko was the bad guy, "greed" really wasn't "good".

The age demo you are describing are from the same generation as those kids whose parents told them not to go to Richie's party because Sticks Downey was going to be there. They aren't necessarily racist and would have no problem having a black guy as a neighbor or friend, but because of how and when they were raised, a black dude as President might just be a bit too much for them to handle. Obama should do just fine with the boomers and the "kids" - it's the age demos directly before and after the boomer era where he'll have the most trouble.

I played McCain's speech backwards and found that he was repeating the same statement over and over again, in different languages.
"Pull my finger", "Pull my finger", "Pull my finger".

I played McCain's speech backwards and found that he was repeating the same statement over and over again, in different languages.
"Pull my finger", "Pull my finger", "Pull my finger".

START THE CLOCK!!!

CAN TPM PLEASE START A CLOCK OF THE DAYS THAT ARE GOING BY WITH SARAH PALIN NOT SITTING DOWN FOR A NATIONAL INTERVIEW WITH A SERIOUS REPORTER FROM A LEGITIMATE NEWS ORGANIZATION? It's a shame that she could potentially be a heartbeat away from the presidency and we've yet to hear her without a script.

START THE CLOCK!!!

CAN TPM PLEASE START A CLOCK OF THE DAYS THAT ARE GOING BY WITH SARAH PALIN NOT SITTING DOWN FOR A NATIONAL INTERVIEW WITH A SERIOUS REPORTER FROM A LEGITIMATE NEWS ORGANIZATION? It's a shame that she could potentially be a heartbeat away from the presidency and we've yet to hear her without a script.

Not part of the job requirement. The McCain campaign get to decide that.

tick tock tick tock

user-pic

McCain's ratings are a function of NFL on NBC - I'm sure a good number of those viewers, like me either dozed off or were off walking the bed before the thing ended.

user-pic

McCain's ratings are a function of NFL on NBC - I'm sure a good number of those viewers, like me either dozed off or were off walking the bed before the thing ended.

user-pic

McCain's ratings are a function of NFL on NBC - I'm sure a good number of those viewers, like me either dozed off or were off walking the bed before the thing ended.

user-pic

McCain's ratings are a function of NFL on NBC - I'm sure a good number of those viewers, like me either dozed off or were off walking the bed before the thing ended.

user-pic

McCain's ratings are a function of NFL on NBC - I'm sure a good number of those viewers, like me either dozed off or were off walking the bed before the thing ended.

Thanks so much for sharing the link. It was a good piece--truly excellent in some areas.

I am personally still sore at her, and will likely remain so, after that hit piece in the NYT earlier this year, but those are my personal feelings. That she's bringing clarity and truth about who is truly on the side of women and doing so publicly is most important, and I applaud her for doing so.

I gotta say that these polls are pretty much worthless until this time next week. Way too much stuff is going on. And I have no idea if 40 million people seeing McCain talk last night was the best or worst thing that could happen to his campaign.

http://pufferfish.typepad.com/

user-pic

Meanwhile, over at electoral-vote.com:

Today (2008-09-05):
Obama 301 McLame 224 Ties 13

Yesterday's numbers:
Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13

So Obama is up 3 EV's from yesterday.
Change since yesterday: ND moved from "weak R" to "weak D"

Obama also up 23 EV's since 2008-08-28
Those numbers were Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13
Change from 20080828 to 20080904: OH, with 20 EV's moved from "weak R" to "weak D".

The tie state in all cases is VA (13 EV's.)

It's about the Electoral College, as PeninsulaMatt notes upthread.

Although a resounding popular victory would be nice as well -- "mandate" and all.

The numbers at pollster.com, otoh, have remained largely static for a while (Obama 260 EV's).

user-pic

Meanwhile, over at electoral-vote.com:

Today (2008-09-05):
Obama 301 McLame 224 Ties 13

Yesterday's numbers:
Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13

So Obama is up 3 EV's from yesterday.
Change since yesterday: ND moved from "weak R" to "weak D"

Obama also up 23 EV's since 2008-08-28
Those numbers were Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13
Change from 20080828 to 20080904: OH, with 20 EV's moved from "weak R" to "weak D".

The tie state in all cases is VA (13 EV's.)

It's about the Electoral College, as PeninsulaMatt notes upthread.

Although a resounding popular victory would be nice as well -- "mandate" and all.

The numbers at pollster.com, otoh, have remained largely static for a while (Obama 260 EV's).

user-pic

Meanwhile, over at electoral-vote.com:

Today (2008-09-05):
Obama 301 McLame 224 Ties 13

Yesterday's numbers:
Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13

So Obama is up 3 EV's from yesterday.
Change since yesterday: ND moved from "weak R" to "weak D"

Obama also up 23 EV's since 2008-08-28
Those numbers were Obama 298 McLame 227 Ties 13
Change from 20080828 to 20080904: OH, with 20 EV's moved from "weak R" to "weak D".

The tie state in all cases is VA (13 EV's.)

It's about the Electoral College, as PeninsulaMatt notes upthread.

Although a resounding popular victory would be nice as well -- "mandate" and all.

The numbers at pollster.com, otoh, have remained largely static for a while (Obama 260 EV's).

user-pic

It seems like Obama did not really move much. (In fact, today's Rasmussen has him higher than yesterday.) Arguably, those slight ticks for him are just MOE artifacts (down 1 point from his Rasmussen high and 2 from Gallup). McCain appears to have gotten a real bounce, but it seems to have occurred without him taking anyone from Obama (with the caveat that we won't know the full effect until Monday, yet the fact that he ticked up after dropping is heartening). I suspect that McCain only accomplished solidifying his base and fencesitters on the right who would have held their noses and voted for him regardless are now committing. It will be interesting to see if McCain can ever get past 45-46 in the national averages. I doubt it. My sense is that picking Palin has also made fencesitters on the left decide that there is no way they can support him. If they can't support Obama, but the current percentages hold, adjusting for their absence, Obama wins the popular vote with over 51%. Except in rare circumstance (2000), that means an electoral college victory as well. In addition, electoral college analyses are leaning heavily in his favor.

I went to the grocery this afternoon, and there was Sarah plastered over three major tabloids. The theme was sorta "Poor Sarah- so many scandals, so many secrets!".

And, of course you cannot miss them. I wondered how many people are just getting how very complicated Gov Palin's life is.

I think she might be more shooting star than superstar. There may be a random convention bounce, but I don't think Palin wears well.
And Mac went between dull and creepy Thursday night.

Ooh-ooh! and the economy collapsed Friday.

The "maverick" is looking more and more like a sidekick...merely going along with the powers that be...he says and does whatever he thinks his champions want to hear. Just like calling lobbyists 'birds of prey' which is a total contradiction to what his true ties with these unnecessary evils in Washinton are.

And I'm simply at a loss for words regarding Ms. Palin's popularity. We don't even know her. What planet are these people from that are going on and on about how wonderful she is...one woman said.."I love her. I love her kids. I even love her parents!" (who I wouldn't have been able to point out in a line up had it not been for a brief glimpse provided by the cameramen at the RNC...What is wrong with this country?

The polls are of no real concern this time of the election because one of the candidates can sneeze and the poll will change. I have more faith in the voters than to put the party who wrecked our economy back in power. We are in more danger of falling from with in because of failed economy policies of the Republican party. Don't let anyone fool you this not just a business cycle this is a fundamental flaw in our system. The danger of terrorism is nothing compared to this.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address