Polls: Majorities In Key States Say Economy Is Most Important Issue
Here are some interesting numbers buried in the new Quinnipiac polls that shed some light on now the financial meltdown is playing for the candidates in the four battleground states polled.
In all four states, a solid majority of voters rate the economy as the single most important issue: 51% in Colorado, 58% in Michigan, 55% in Minnesota, and 51% in Wisconsin. By contrast, Iraq and terrorism combined are only in the high teens as the most important issue in all these states.
Meanwhile, in three out of those four states, Obama is seen as understanding the economy better than John McCain: 47%-41% in Colorado, 50%-38% in Michigan, and 47%-40% in Wisconsin. The two are tied on 45%-45% on the economy in Minnesota.
Separately, it doesn't look like Sarah Palin has done much to move female voters. Obama's edges among them are comparable to his leads in the last Quinnipiac polls from a month ago. Even more interestingly, women are picking Joe Biden over Palin in a hypothetical presidential match-up by margins of ten points or more.















"I can Russia from my house!"
September 23, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ooops, "see" Russia. Can Russia be a verb? Can one "Russia"? Sorry.
September 23, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eventually, yes. All is possible in this world.
September 23, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
What i love about this "i can see Russia" thing is that the distance between DC and Moscow is about the same as Wasila Moscow. She can see the northern tip of Siberia, a vast wasteland for thousands of miles.
September 23, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why has no one mentioned that you also see Canada from Alaska? Doesn't that burnish her foreign policy cred? Alaska is in a foreign policy ménage à trois.
September 23, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
You can sure bet Putin will russia Palin right out of the room.
September 23, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Today's Top Story: Quinnipiac polls confirms the obvious!
September 23, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well I always knew we were smarter than men.
;)
September 23, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a man, in this case, I completely agree with you.
September 23, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let's face it -- if we had passed a constitutional amendment denying men the right to vote -- kind of a counterpoint to the 19th Amendment -- we'd be electing a successor to President Gore or reelecting President Kerry. And we'd have nothing but Democratic Congresses from here to eternity.
September 23, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd bet the white, Christian males of this country wish they could use the "way back machine" to revisit August 18th, 1920. The 19th Amendment would never have been passed.
PEACE
September 23, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
thats why i love women................
September 23, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't there a CNN poll that says by 2:1 people blame the GOP for the economic crisis?
September 23, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That seems to be in contradiction with Lifetime Television's latest poll. I don't know from polls, but the women in my life seem to confirm Quinnipiac.
September 23, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
And just who is watching Lifetime? GOP stay at home Christian moms.
Not a true sampling of American women.
Just saying...
PEACE
September 23, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
(from Schmedley's link)
ROFLMAO!
September 23, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm in a very, very conservative part of Colorado (James Dobson/Ted Haggard country). It's hard to find undecideds here, but I've found a few, and have spent time talking to each one. I've asked what their issues are and -- at least for every one I've talked to -- it's pretty much along the lines we expect. 1) Hate Bush's policies and feel he is a failure. 2) Economy is issue #1, #2 and #3. 3) Don't trust either McCain or Obama.
I think (3) is in part caused by the confusion generated by the McCain campaign and in part by the fact that Obama's speeches, of necessity, don't go into much detail.
I've found I make the biggest impact when I recite the names of Obama's economic advisory staff. Buffett, O'Neill, Volcker. Not everyone recognizes all the names initially (Buffett, however, is universally recognized and respected), but they do after a one sentence bio. The undecideds I've met are very impressed by his advisors, and are quick to believe that McCain's are the same ones Bush used.
One other thing: amongst undecideds Palin is a negative -- often very strong negative -- while everyone I met seems to think Biden strengthened the Obama ticket.
I am confident Colorado will go to Obama by a safe margin. These undecideds are clearly ready to vote against the incumbent party -- they are just looking for a reason to get comfortable with the Obama ticket.
September 23, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The "just looking for a reason to get comfortable with" is why Obama has the potential to hit a home run at the debate on Friday, in spite of what the pundits spin may be.
September 23, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I think the opportunity to simply be on par on the dais with McCain and looking "Presidential" is a win for Obama. Barring any significant gaffes I think he wins either way where it matters most; convincing Americans that he is even-tempered, thoughtful and not the risky choice too many still think he is. In this sense, the closest parallel to his pre-debate position that I can see is Reagan in 1980, who had a similar task to fulfill and the same upside if he did.
September 23, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes acamus, the debate will help Obama if he does perform well. This is going to the break deal, I believe. He has to be seen as assertive and straight to the point.
On the other hand, I can see the media use the usual distractions.
If Senator Obama is ahead in the polls is because he is over performing, it can not be true, it is a close race and will be so until the end...
September 23, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
One debate is not a deal make or breaker.
It may have an effect on some undecideds, but the entire campaign does not hinge on the debate.
September 23, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
one debate is not normally a deal make or break but it can be. Depends if someone makes a huge gaff.
September 23, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
She can see the end of the world from whereever she is.
September 23, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama really needs to get the point across that unless you're in the top 1% regarding income you're better off under Obama's tax plan. Folks still believe Obama is going to tax them more than McCain will, and that is completely false.
Obama isn't doing enough to get this message out clearly and concisely.
Instead of wasting money on silly Bermuda ads, he should be running one minute ads in all swing states clearly explaining with visual aids that his tax plan is better for everybody except those with income in the top 1%. Maybe have 4-5 everyday folks in varying circumstances and income brackets saying A]their situation and income and then how much they'd benefit more under the Obama tax plan compared to the McCain play.
He really needs to get this point across, as it seems to be a big issue held against him by folks - the belief that Obama will raise taxes on them, whereas McCain will not.
September 23, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The second half of the Lifetime poll was "do you like Eva Longoria's dress she wore to the Emmys?"
September 23, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but the debate is on Friday (rather than a Tuesday or something) to reduce viewership. The media will then claim that McCain did better than he did, assuming he does badly. That being said, McCain is not George W. Bush, who clearly lost every debate with Gore and Kerry, but was propped up. Dick Hardball even strongly claimed that W. won a couple of them. I digress. McCain is not George W. Bush, McCain does OK in a debate format, Obama's strength in debates depend on the night, the debate may not favor Obama at all, but back to my point, if it does, the MSM will jawbone McCain's performance up. Obama needs to dominate McCain and especially given McCain's recent comfort level with lying, and the media's reluctance to call him out on them to the extent that they are complete lies in many cases, Friday could be tough.
September 23, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
The second half of the Lifetime poll was "do you like Eva Longoria's dress she wore to the Emmys?"
September 23, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I mean, is that there are some undecided voters who are concerned about Obama mainly because of the media and because of some inuendos...
So what he has to do on Friday is to show to these people that he is one of us, that he is nothing like the inuendos....
September 23, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The key to the debate on Friday IMHO will be if he can link the economy to foreign policy. If he does that and I think he will, he wins the debate and his poll numbers go up.
September 23, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup! Musik to my ears!
September 23, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup! Musik to my ears!
September 23, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink