Poll: Obama Up By Four Points Nationally
The new ABC/Washington Post poll shows Barack Obama leading John McCain 50%-46%, with a ±3% margin of error.
For now at least, the election is really coming down to the economy. Obama leads 50%-43% on handling the economy, and leads 50%-40% on handling the current financial crisis. McCain wins on foreign policy questions, but security doesn't seem to be enough to get him into the lead.
On the one hand, this poll does seem to vindicate the McCain campaign's contention that last week's ABC/WaPo survey was an outlier when it had Obama leading 52%-43% among likely voters. On the other hand, Obama is still ahead -- and it doesn't speak well of the McCain campaign's confidence that they felt the need to hold a conference call with reporters and aggressively debunk an outlying poll.















SUSA, McCain + 1 Ohio, + 3 IN
September 30, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks big cheese. Those polls were posted in the tracker on the right.
September 30, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
So they were, got bumped off the top list before i saw them i guess.
September 30, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, that 52-43 number was pretty much in line with the R2K poll of today of 51-41 and yesterday's Gallup poll of 50-42. The consensus seems to be solidifying around a national lead of anywhere from 5-7 points.
September 30, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me that this ABC/WaPo poll is an outlier as well, only erring on the side of McCain.
For instance, it says that white women support McCain just as much now as they did at the end of the Republican National Convention!
After the repeated Palin flubs... well... who believes that?!
Why does ABC/WaPo poll keep getting it wrong? The answer is probably their comparatively small sample size.
They've got about a third of the sample size as Gallup and Rasmussen from yesterday, both of which indicated Obama up by 6%.
So... why is TPM focusing on this one poll? It seems silly to try to draw any conclusions from just one poll, when there are several larger polls from the same day.
October 1, 2008 3:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me that this ABC/WaPo poll is an outlier as well, only erring on the side of McCain.
For instance, it says that white women support McCain just as much now as they did at the end of the Republican National Convention!
After the repeated Palin flubs... well... who believes that?!
Why does ABC/WaPo poll keep getting it wrong? The answer is probably their comparatively small sample size.
They've got about a third of the sample size as Gallup and Rasmussen from yesterday, both of which indicated Obama up by 6%.
So... why is TPM focusing on this one poll? It seems silly to try to draw any conclusions from just one poll, when there are several larger polls from the same day.
October 1, 2008 3:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Frankly, I'm more interested in the InsiderAdvantage results from Ohio and Virginia and the Muhlenberg poll from PA.
September 30, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
We're going to win Ohio.
Book it!
October 1, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
How about the InsiderAdvantage numbers from VA and OH?
September 30, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, a little bit of good Karma, perhaps.
Senator Obama's beloved White Sox just beat The Twins, in a one game playoff, and are now in the American league playoffs.
In fact, both Chicago Baseball teams are in the playoffs.
Could this be a banner year for The Land Of Lincoln!
September 30, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The trifecta would be if we also got the 2016 Olympics.
September 30, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Red Sox won in 2004, didn't work out so well for Kerry.
September 30, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't tell that to Cubs fans!
September 30, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
It looks like McSame's age is becoming more of a concern.
A slim majority (+4%) of RVs said they were OK with McCranky's age, 48-52. That's significantly down from 56-42 (+14%) on 2008-09-07.
Maybe it reflects his recent erratic behavior?
September 30, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just five points?!?!
Is it just me, or does it seem like nothing McCain/Palin say or do will erase the fact that Obama is black from the minds of a great many of our fellow Americans? Seems like it's the Bush dead-enders plus 10% or so. They just won't budge no matter how absurd and pethetic the GOP clown show.
September 30, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, seriously. WTF is wrong with these people? McCain is an idiot and a barefaced liar. Almost every word out of his and Caribou Barbier's mouth is a lie. They've now totally destroyed America with that "braintrust" that includes the assclown who wrote that book "Dow 36,000" and Phil Gramm, architect of the meltdown. Who are these 42% of morons/racists/suicides that want to "stay the course" right into oblivion?
September 30, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Assclown is a really, really good word.
September 30, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brace yourself - They could show pictures of McCain and Palin doing the nasty on primetime TV and people would still vote for them because they just would never vote for a black person. For many people racism runs very very deep. A lot are people you know and would never have guessed because they have learned to not be public about it. That is why the muslim meme won't go away. They cannot tell you that the idea of voting for a black person makes them sick.
September 30, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you Blue. There are many who know it's not PC to say they are racist but it's easy for them to be anti-Muslim because of the political climate that emerged after 9/11.
A good example is Dayton, OH mosque attack where children where sprayed with a noxious substance and not a peep from the MSM.
October 1, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Likely a small percentage is because of race. More likely is the fact that the country is divided, red vs. blue, the Iraq war is no longer in the news and McCain is a Republican who has cultivated the image of being the renegade of his party. That's as good as it gets for republicans in a year when the incumbent Bush is so unpopular.
September 30, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this result of 50-46 within the margin of error of last weeks result of 52-43?
September 30, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why yes it is. But don't tell anyone.
September 30, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hee hee :)
September 30, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. But that is vindication of McCain's spin in Eric's mind.
October 1, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey! Nate Silver is on Olbermann.
September 30, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Saw that - 82% chance of any Obma victory. Amazing
September 30, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't speak well of the McSame campaign's confidence that they've been running around lately like a bunch of chickens with their heads cut off.
September 30, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
There seems to be - well, almost nothing - that speaks well of the McCain campaign. I was in the doctor's office today, and FOX was on. The only reaction I could see around the room was sighing, and head-shaking. You know - that sideways, wtf, kind of head shaking?
September 30, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you don't look like much of an Old Grouch to me!
October 1, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
lol... huh? Someone said I was...?
October 1, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
The magic number is 50%.
September 30, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just five points?!?!
Is it just me, or does it seem like nothing McCain/Palin say or do will erase the fact that Obama is black from the minds of a great many of our fellow Americans? Seems like it's the Bush dead-enders plus 10% or so. They just won't budge no matter how absurd and pethetic the GOP clown show.
I believe so. I live in California and this past weekend we were calling the battleground state of NC and some of the people that were called said they would not vote for a black man!!! There were others that said they were leaning towards voting for Barack but weren't sure if he were Christian enough!!! So yes, there are some that will vote race and not care about the direction this country is going.
September 30, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
OT, but just when I sort of forget about Commander CooCoo for a little while, something like this story breaks -
Another military prosecutor who was stationed at GITMO has resigned and published an affidavit about the case that caused him to resign.
And you know what Bush's response was? He suggested the prosecutor is crazy. If you're my age or anywhere near it, this ought to ring all kinds of bells. That's what they always said about dissidents in the USSR. I grew up with these things being used as examples of ultimate evil.
I cannot believe my country has come to this. He did that with scientists, too and assigned them "minders."
I want out of this fucking Bush America so bad -
September 30, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand how anyone who has been paying any attention at all, can look around at what's happened in this country in the last 7 years and every consider pulling the lever for a Republican ever again in their life.
September 30, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was yelling the same thing in the middle of Costco yesterday. I was shopping with a friend and she started telling me about her friend voting for McCain. I am just stunned about it. If you don't know a thing about the issues can you at least look at your own life and say "Duh this isn't so good and there has been a republican in office the last 8 years". Republicans are the living definition of insanity. By the way, my friend grabbed my arm and told me to calm down because people were looking - I said they ought to be listening.
September 30, 2008 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
O dear, you remind me of me.
Do you do guerilla bookstore action? I have been known to go into a Borders or one of the other chains just to go turn all the winger books upside down and back side out so they don't draw attention.
October 1, 2008 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
You do that too? I also take copies of nice liberal books and put them in front of (or on top of) the offending wingnut books.
October 1, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I did that in Target when Obama Nation first came out, except I hid them all in a different department.
October 1, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR MCCAIN!!!
September 30, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Party on, Garth!
September 30, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Given the perpetually catastrophic Bush presidency, combined with the damage McCain has done to his own reputation, one wonders how the polls could still reveal a tight race.
September 30, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good observation.
September 30, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is no such thing as a popular vote magic number. Bush/Gore should have taught every one that lesson. It matters not if you pile up huge margins in California, New York, and Illinois, if you do not MOP up. MOP(Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania.)
When it is all said and done, those three states will decide who will be the next president.
September 30, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I agree that Obama should be up 20 points, the reality is that 42% of the population identify as Republican and 46% calls themselves Democrats and these folks will vote down party lines in very high percentages.
The key is to rally your base while appealing to the "independents". Folks who haven't made up their minds yet are low information voters who will probably break towards McCain based on his reputation which is why it's so important that Obama is at or near 50% in these polls as election day approaches. Then it will all come down to getting out the vote.
September 30, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's depressing to think that 88% of the electorate might not be swayed by facts, events, or reason but, I suppose it makes sense out of the poll figures we are seeing.
September 30, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where the hell did you get 88% of the public out of those numbers.
Goddamn - where do they get Bush's approvals - from Martians.
quit blaming stupidity,. We have run well until this year.
The Democrats held the majority for over 40 years - who were those voters? Venusians?
Get over it!
September 30, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok - I meant to say:
We have not run well until this year.
We have not run well until this year in a presidential race.
We fucking won in '06.
'And it does too count.
September 30, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena:
42% + 46% = 88%
That is the total of both Dem. and GOP voters. A high percentage of whom - paraphrasing Jonze - will vote along party lines.
September 30, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sez Jonze who is rarely correct, frankly.
September 30, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The poll has Bush's disapproval at 70% -- the highest ever recorded by ABC/WaPo. *squee*
September 30, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that quite a few of this 70% are ready to vote for McCain is mind-boggling.
September 30, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
The 70% figure isn't the news, the news is that means 30% of Americans still APPROVE of the job Bush is doing. That's nearly one-third the voting population! I suppose that particular poll result, as much as anything, shows what we (and Obama) are up against in our fight for a better country.
September 30, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, it's 27% (or 26%; their report has a data entry error there, but either one of them).
But what drives me as nuts is those 3% of "No opinion." Who are those people???
September 30, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
How can the 30% be neutered?
September 30, 2008 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remain floored by that 26% too. I'm fairly open about my politics, and try to draw people out to state their views whenever I can. I rarely, if ever, run into anyone who will *admit* that they approve of Bush. It's a very solid number too. Been there for a year or so, it seems to me.
September 30, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I live on the upper west side of Manhattan (Deepblueistan) so I haven't got the foggiest freaking clue who those 26% could be, and I certainly don't encounter any, I'm happy to say (haven't been on Staten Island lately, though they tell me it's part of my city). Situated here, one is inclined to take the view of the 26% deadenders that Queen Victoria took of lesbians - you just refuse to imagine they could actually exist.
October 1, 2008 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well I don't know about Ohio but things look good in PA.
Listen to the guy laughing in the back saying "split?"
September 30, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forget the top line numbers, I thought this series of questions was eye-opening (hopefully the formatting isn't too bad):
September 30, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oops, guess imbed vids don't work, here's the URL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTkqosRiyYo
September 30, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting, the racial breakdown was different for this week compared to last (fewer African-Americans and Hispanics):
September 30, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shit.
9/22 9/29
Whites: 73/74 76/79 [All/RV]
Black: 12/12 12/11
Latino: 8/6 6/5
Asian: 1/1 1/*
Other: 6/6 5/4
If my math is right, Whites registered voters increased 6.7% week over week. Whereas Blacks and Latinos (RV), decreased 8.33% and 20%, respectively, week over week. I'm not sure if this matters, but it seems, well interesting. I wonder if they addressed this in weighting. The number of married registered voters increased from 60% to 64% (6.67% increase). Again, I don't know if this matters, but it seems interesting.
September 30, 2008 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another tidbit from the internals: Who won the debate?
38 BigO
24 McSame
22 Tie
16 What debate?
September 30, 2008 11:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Democrats are sitting in the best position they've been in since 1992 and it's better because right now the opposition party is in full meltdown. No one is in charge of the Repug party which is very fractured.
The polls are awesome - so if you like the polls, they're all the same: Obama wins.
And some of y'all are whining. Please stop it. I mean to tell you - we're in a very wonderful place - Embrace the fuck out of it and believe - quit trying to bring us down all the time.
September 30, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
TenaX, sometimes you are just silly. McCain and Paulson are co leaders of the Repubican party. They have hidden Cheney so well he can't find his way back out and Shrub's mama told him he doesn't have to act like he cares any more - just start packing and come home. Your confusion may be caused by Newt repowering back up but McCain is going to send his pitbull around to straighten Newt out.
September 30, 2008 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm silly - Well I guess Keith Olbermann and especially Rachel Maddow are silly cause that's where I got this.
September 30, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
What makes you so sure you're right?
September 30, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read too fast sometimes.
Your comment is very funny.
;)
[sorry]
September 30, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
No worries, TenaX. Most times I read too slow and I find things that aren't there too.
October 1, 2008 6:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena: It's not that we're trying to bring dems and/or the country down, it's that we're wary of tempting fate and worried about getting our hearts broken again.
For the pessimists among us, the higher Obama goes in the polls, the more states come on board, the more the narrative moves in his favor, the more terrified we get.
Every minute, we're reliving the overconfidence of 2004, when we were so sure that a majority were as eager to get rid of Smirky/Darth as we were.
To us, assumptions of victory ring as harbingers of doom.
I want the polls as close to dead even - or even McCain ahead by one or two - right up until Election Day. On November 4, I'm fine with a landslide.
Until then, as far as I'm concerned, we're way behind and have a huge job ahead of us.
October 1, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hilo Harrington Poll
Obama 91
McCain 7.777
September 30, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, but the way this election has unfolded is in a sense like a horror movie, and you gotta understand that is chilling people's spine...
(And see Josh's most recent post. It's going to be sicker and more disgusting).
September 30, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope they do get down and really dirty because that is not doing them any good.
It hasn't done them any good so far. It's hurt them.
September 30, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it was Cooper who covered this idea on CNN tonight as well. The developing narrative seems to be that the GOP is fractured, in disarray, and running without any real leadership.
September 30, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Among other developing narratives, like: Sarah Palin needs to go, Is McLame too old?
Like that there. How can anyone complain? Where is the bad press about Obama?
September 30, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well that's a good point. There really isn't any unless you count McCain surrogates attempts to drool on the mic about how unfashionably cool Obama is about the Economic Crisis(TM). But so far, within the current frame, the punditocracy itself seems to be slapping a lot of this stuff down, unless there's a Carville or someone there to do it. Very interesting times, I would say. And I mean that in a good way.
October 1, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, head knows that. But heart pukes.
:P
September 30, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey I donate every time I puke, so that's not a bad thing :)
September 30, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol... hang in there. One more month, and then we can.... sigh... start fighting new battles.
:)
October 1, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Swing state polls are the only polls that matter from today till Nov. 4.
September 30, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting poll but life moves on. I am telling you we are going to turn that map blue like the ocean fell on it. 350 electoral votes with an added GOTV,Cell phones not being counted adequately AND an electorate that literally CAN'T WAIT to throw this party out of office.
September 30, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but this means all of us--and I do mean ALL OF US--have to work on GOTV efforts. Volunteer for election day! Register to call voters in swing states.
I know some of this can really be demoralizing, but almost every person I talk to recognizes that turnout is what will swing it for Obama. So we have got to turn those folks out!
September 30, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
So... How many polls is that now putting Obama at or above 50%? Hmm... And.. has McCain EVER broken 50%? Seriously, now.
September 30, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The last time he did it was 22 years ago.
September 30, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry didn't see the %. Oh well. So?
September 30, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
It still works. He was 50% of 100 years old then.
September 30, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
For some comic relief folks, take a look at the blog that is asking for the definition of what a troll is.
It is absolutely hilarious. It is working like a roach motel, but this time a troll motel.
All the renowned habitual trolls have rushed into to it, to engage in some heavy duty trolling, in order to try and convince everyone that they really have never been trolls.
You will love it. Just look for the ones who jumped in, and immediately start explaining why they are not trolls. That makes it easy to compile the list of self confirming trolls.
Well, I am out of here. Will the last one remaining please put out the cat, and turn off the blog.
Good night and joy be with ye all.
September 30, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just some food for thought for all us peeps...
Do you think any of the trolls would come back if nobody responded to the substance of their comments?
They really have no interest in convincing anybody of anything. They measure their success by the number of replies (and replies to replies) they get.
I don't think there's much harm in ridiculing their parentage or asking who farted, but referencing anything they say in their comments is counter-productive.
G'night, Liam.
I know it takes restraint, but it does pay off.
October 1, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
It does - it works.
But you will never ever be able to get everyone in line with this.'
Ever.
I've seen at least 100 tries at this, vicious fights over it, feuds over it on boards - on feeding vs. not feeding the trolls.
It does make em go away - but there's just no way to enforce it.
;)
at least that's my experience.
October 1, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know, but every little bit helps.
I hope :-)
October 1, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
You might get some temporary relief.
I'll tell when it works: when you've got a really persistent obnoxious troll you can make that work.
Those of you whose experience is mainly here haven't got a clue what real troll infestation is like - believe me. I mean, they get psycho; they start stealing identities (which is harder to do with avatars, thank god) and posting as a regular and saying really outrageous shit. They'll post things like: my cat died; I have cancer - and you wake up with 75 emails from terribly concerned friends.
My dearest peeps - this board is extremely clean and civil for an open board.
October 1, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone else noticed that WaPo, the paper that regaled us with thrilling narratives about a crucial swing groups composed of white mothers with a clever name in 2000 and 2004 that turned out to be complete statistical hallucinations is the only one picking up wild swings in in the white mother vote in its polls this year?
September 30, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
How come democrats are taking polls at face value. The Bradley effect is an extremely well documented thing. We ought to be very afraid of a poll that says that Obama is 4-5 points ahead. That probably means that he probably a little bit behind.
Do we have our heads in the sand? Do we hope that believing or hoping that the Bradley effect will go away will, in fact, make it go away?
September 30, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Read this entry
http://election.princeton.edu/2008/09/27/the-disappearing-bradley-effect/#more-1277
and read this paper discussed there
http://people.iq.harvard.edu/~dhopkins/wilder13.pdf
and tell us what you think.
September 30, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the links. Good stuff.
October 1, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Bradley Effect is a bunch of shit.
It's a model from when? 1992? Or the 80s? I can't remember.
The primaries demonstrated absolutely not so-called Bradley Effect.
That is a completely unprovable proposition and nothing more. It's next door to a myth. One fucking election a million years ago.
Please.
October 1, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thinkingman, go read fivethirtyeight for a thorough debunking of the so-called Bradley effect.
You'll have to go back a week or so, but it's a convincing argument.
The racists are already proudly and loudly backing McCain.
October 1, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Either ABC/WaPo are seriously incapable of selecting a nationally representative sample or this country is producing dumbfucks in alarming proportions. Take your pick.
Seriously.
McCain campaign has been a national joke- suspension, Palin terror, failed bailout bill, and an average debate performance.
Obama from all other indicators seems to be in a better position to win easily. Just look at the events in the past two weeks.
October 1, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm convinced that both, unfortunately, are probably correct.
October 1, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I think while Bradley Effect may be becoming less and less evident, the insensitivity toward tour democracy, otherwise called "numbness effect" (I made it up totally!!) is increasing at an epic rate.
I do take some comfort in Obama's success in energizing the new pool of eligible voters and I hope these polls don't reflect what I believe will be an unprecedented voter turnout come Nov 4.
October 1, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nate Silver has discussed the polls in this context - specifically that the pollsters aren't, and probably can't, properly weight their polls to reflect what are believed to be massive changes in the electorate.
I'm with you on the high hopes though. Everything that we know about elections tells us that Obama is in a very strong position to win, even without this x factor.
October 1, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
How does float within the MOE "vindicate" the McCain campaign that last's poll was an outlier?
Do you even attempt at actual thought or analysis or do you just just buy every nonsensical assertion by the McCain campaign spin hacks and repeat it here?
October 1, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the linked poll itself:
(emphasis mine)
Yet that vindicates the McCain campaigns assertion last weeks numbers were an outlier. Steno Eric strikes again.
October 1, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTkqosRiyYo
I'm laughing so hard I'm in tears, heee.
October 1, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
That was beautiful. Laughing my ass off.
October 1, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
O Jebus - that's so funny - I think the whole place is laughing at the guy at the end.
O damn that's funny!!!! thanks
October 1, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
O Dave! He just said that the stock market dropped 777 points - he's so glad McCain blew him off to save the economy.
Zing!
October 1, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's been cracking 50% in national and battleground state polls for at least a week now. It's starting to harden and we're not that far from the finish line. McCain's big game-changers haven't changed the game. Everything he does at this point is a desperation move.
I'm not being cocky. I just know what it looks like from McCain's side of this thing and people inside his campaign have got to be thinking they're just about out of chances to turn it around.
October 1, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
the thread focuses on polling numbers, but paying attention to polling content is important, too. mccain still has beyond MOE lead in stuff like "protecting the country," "combating terrorism," even still somehow leads in "foreign policy."
can you say, "October surprise?"
October 1, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes , but those issues poll in the high teens and low twenties as to priority in most polls I have seen on the subject. It's the economy...
October 1, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
And how is McLame going to pull off any fucking October surprise?
LMAO! He doesn't have much money left to start with. More importantly, he has almost no clout -the Senate doesn't like him, Bush hate his guts - who is going to help McLame with some hokey October surprise?
Can y'all ever stop that stuff? That happened exactly once and Cheney was involved. Cheney doesn't have time for McLame.
That was years ago - please quit saying that phrase: October surprise. I've heard it now for election after election and it hasn't happened.
October 1, 2008 1:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure what to think about this poll. It's good news for Obama that he's still ahead, but some of the internals are strange. First, the swing of independents from O +14 to O -3 is quite dramatic. That's an incredible shift in a week. The DOW drop may have precipitated a shift to McCain, since he's perceived in their poll to be better at handling a crisis. But, in the same poll, voters say Obama's better equipped (O +10) to handle the economy. So, I don't see independents rushing to McCain so swiftly; a 17 point change in a week seems unlikely.
Also, I know that winning a debate doesn't automatically impact topline numbers, but RVs think that Obama did better in the debate (O +14). Those RVs also came away with a better impression of Obama (O +12 vs. M +3). Those same RVs also think that McCain is a riskier choice for President; they now think Obama is the safer choice. They also think that Obama is the stronger leader. They think that McCain doesn't have the temperament to be President.. And for all the CIC talk; those numbers haven't changed since their last poll. Yet, McCain gained in the poll? McCain's small gains in the internals were on foreign policy/international issues and on the economy. But, how does one gain ground when other key leadership aspects of the poll show you losing ground? I know that there's not a causal link between the two, but I would assume that there is a correlation, and I'm guessing that it's not a weak one.
Anyway, after all that, ABC News is reporting this poll this way: "Preference among likely voters overall is 50-46 percent, Obama-McCain, a bit closer (albeit within sampling error) than the 52-43 percent last week." The "albeit within sampling error" is key. I'm wondering, too, how they can put a poll from the 27-29th out on the afternoon/evening of the 29th. I can't recall seeing something like that this year. It brings up the question of who they were polling during the day of the 29th. It seems like they would've missed anyone at work, and would've likely picked up more older voters, who favor McCain.
Basically, I think the "McCain gains" may actually be sampling error. But, we'll have to see what the polls say tomorrow to know if there is legitimate movement towards McCain. The results were mixed today, but most showed Obama slightly widening his lead.
October 1, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Posted this below, but here is a nice summary of what's wrong with this poll's internals:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/1/5176/24902/961/616352
October 1, 2008 8:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jeez, peeps - there's nothing cocky about being realistic about these numbers. There's nothing cocky in feeling like we're in a good position - we are.
I know it's nail-biter time - I remember in 92 about this time in the campaign asking my husband what he thought - and he told me to quit worrying about it - barring some incredible disaster, Clinton had it.
I couldn't believe it. I can't believe it now - I really can't believe it. But it's really happening.
October 1, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love Huffo ledes-
October 1, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I suppose "cul-de-sac" would have been more gentile!
;)
October 1, 2008 5:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
All this stuff about Palin being a train wreck is good for Yuks, but who is going to be laughing on November 5? Memories are very very short. One reasonable performance will erase nearly all that has come before. On Friday we'll see polls saying that Sarah Palin stood up in front of a national audience and showed that she could be president. Even if she just repeats talking points. Its not just that the bar has been lowered, is that the bar is pretty low to begin with.
Read the most recent Couric interview with Palin and McCain. Yes, its like when my Dad made me come down to the drug store with him so I could explain to the store owner how sorry I was I had tried to steal a pack of football cards. But it works. They come across as completely reasonable, even though held to any reasonable standard they are perpetrating a farce. I'll wait until November 5 to laugh.
I predict that at the debate she will come across as very reasonable, moderate and crisp. She'll deny radical beliefs, exclaim the greatness of John McCain, and attack Obama along well established lines. I have a lot of faith that Biden will do very well too. But the story is going to be that she held her own. Ultimately, the only solace we can take in this is that she has absorbed so much time and energy of the McCain campaign up to this point AND that the VP will ultimately have very little impact on the race.
October 1, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
So what happens -is there a certain time of night that you wack concern trolls come out and start littering up the threads with your bullshit?
It's very weak.
None of that will happen - it's a total fantasy and meant to be a big bucket of cold water. Even the fucking rightwing media is on our side this time.
You're out of luck this time. Nobody is paying any attention to you because it's all changed - y'all are still back in 2004 and way behind the curve.
Silly concern trolls - y'all are just so adorable. Really you are - kinda Palin-esque.
October 1, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good night little concern trolls and determinedly miserable liberals everywhere. Y'all will find something to bitch about the night Obama wins.
Swear to god.
October 1, 2008 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Believe me. I hope you're right.
October 1, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
If McCain's 1 trillion dollar proposal for bailout without Congressional approval is not equivalent to conference call, then what is it?
The Maverick shows his ugliest head ever.
October 1, 2008 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm seeing mcCain as more and more like Cheney. Take another look at that video of mcCain on the front page where Josh mentions his behavior when challenged.
He looks positively Cheneyesque. The guy has no honor, but he bristles and simply acts as if everyone HAS to believe him because HE takes himself so seriously. What a total horse's hind end!
I'm looking forward to him being grilled a lot by many newspapers as he seeks their endorsement. And since more and more papers record these interviews, we should get to see a lot more of this bristly pompous liar.
October 1, 2008 2:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I'm seeing mcCain as more and more like Cheney...He looks positively Cheneyesque. The guy has no honor, but he bristles and simply acts as if everyone HAS to believe him because HE takes himself so seriously. What a total horse's hind end!"
How very true!
October 1, 2008 5:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
This pathetic old man is not just a Liar - but a Pompous Liar!
mcPompousLiar.... shameful laughingstock of our country and the world!
October 1, 2008 8:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
you know what I think about polls?
don't answer that. Of course you don't know who lives there. I'll tell you who lives there, a ....
whoa, wrong movie.
I think that every poll, no matter what the issue or question, should have to ask, "do you think Elvis is still alive?"
That way when we see 30% approve of Bush and in the same polling sample we come up with 20% who think Elvis is alive, we would have some real prespective on the results.
October 1, 2008 6:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who will provide McCain with an October surprise? Bin Laden -- that's who. It may not be much -- probably just a new web video rather than an actual attack, but it may be enough. Remember how he gave Bush a last minute assist in 2004 with a web video?
Bin Laden wants continued Republican rule. It's a classic strategy of guerilla campaigns and covert operations. Pick off your opponents best minds -- prop up their weakest leaders, or else the leaders whose policies would be most destructive to your opponent. Bin Laden knows that for him to embrace Obama is potentially the kiss of death to the American public, so that is probably what he will do.
October 1, 2008 6:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with that, though, is that Obama is th eone who has been slamming the Bush Administration for not goin gafter Bin Laden aggressively enough. On top of that, McCain just made a point of criticizing Obama's pledge to go after al Qaida leaders wherever we may find them. A last minute OBL tape might be enough to seal the deal for the Democrat this time around.
October 1, 2008 7:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama at his best, explains Rescue plan in common language,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM79CxHGhlY
October 1, 2008 7:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
This dkos diary does a swell job of laying out the changes in the ABC/WaPo poll's internals from last time to this one:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/1/5176/24902/961/616352
October 1, 2008 7:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good morning!
Quinnipiac University polls:
FLORIDA: Obama 51, McCain 43
OHIO: Obama 50, McCain 42
PENNSYLVANIA: Obama 54, McCain 39
October 1, 2008 7:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yowza.
October 1, 2008 8:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boo-yaa!!!! And Obama was up in all three pre-debate. The debate just solidified his lead. McCain is going to absolutely lose it over the next week or so. This thing isn't over yet....
October 1, 2008 8:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow!
These are far and away the best polling numbers we have seen. I will be anxiously awaiting the analysis over at 538.
October 1, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow... that's a big shift. Expect McCain to announce another suspension today, everyone.
I'm looking forward to seeing the internals.
October 1, 2008 8:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I figure that Obama 375 McCain 163 is the limit as to how high Obama can go and how low McCain can go in the electoral college. This is giving McCain only the red, red states.
At this rate Obama might get close!!
October 1, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not to put on the tinfoil, but remember how the mcShame *lower life forms* cried bloody murder after the previous WaPo results. I just can't help but wonder if they simply went back and "redid" things - as a way of throwing a bone to a dog.
So, is this latest poll simply lipstick as a sop to repubs?
October 1, 2008 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
The national polling average at Pollster has Obama up by 5, so 4 is not all that surprising. It's only surprising compared to the results last week, which everyone seemed to think overstated Obama's advantage.
Who cares anyway? Just look at those Quinnipiac numbers!
October 1, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
BREAKING NEWS: Senator McCain, after his discussions with House Republicans, announced that if you eliminate Mark to Market Accounting, his poll deficit disappears and junk derivatives will get you a happy meal at McDonalds.
October 1, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink