Palin To Suggest Her Dem Opponents "Look Down" On Small Town America
Some advance excerpts of Sarah Palin's big speech are now available, and they offer a glimpse of how she'll parry criticism of her lack of experience.
Palin plans to suggest that critics who have said her mayoralty of Wasilla hasn't prepared her for the presidency are snobby about small-town America. Here's the key excerpt:
I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town. I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids' public education better. When I ran for city council, I didn't need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too.Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities.
Dems "look down" on Palin's small-town experience -- that's a good one. At least we know where this is headed. Suppose it's hardly surprising, really.
Palin will also keep up the McCain campaign's assault on the media with this crowd-pleaser:
But here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion -- I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country.
More excerpts after the jump.
I'm not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I've learned quickly, these past few days, that if you're not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country. * * *Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America's energy problems -- as if we all didn't know that already. But the fact that drilling won't solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all. Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we're going to lay more pipelines...build more nuclear plants...create jobs with clean coal...and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources. We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers.
* * *Here's how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change.















Just a little ironic
Republicans saying Democrats are humiliating a seventeen year old girl for political purposes - rather then looking at the larger point which is abstinence vs. sex education and birth control.
Yet those very same Republicans are more then willing to send seventeen year olds to Iraq to die based on lies for the political purpose of making McCain's surge appear successful when all we have done is enable Iraqi Shiites to eventually align themselves with Iranian Shiites against Americas best interests.
September 3, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only that, but how much funding has Palin provided for teen pregnancy programs like Planned Parenthood? Her pregnant, unwed, teen daughter becomes legitimate criticism when her mother's policies and positions directly contradict her own reality. To publically rail against contraception and teen pregnancy all the while having a pregnant, unwed, teen daughter becomes the ultimate in hypocrisy
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that's a fair assessment. None of us would be talking about her daughter's pregnancy if the McCain campaign didn't trot the whole family onto stage for political purposes.
September 3, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain also trotted out the unfortunate teenage boy who is the father of the Palin's new grandchild, and embarrassed him in front of the whole world, just for McCain's personal political benefit. This is not a nice man.
September 3, 2008 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
READ THIS!
The next time someone asks "Would they ask those questions of a man?" The answer is "yes!"
Because the media did question if John Edwards should run for President when he has small children!
Look: http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/bookman/
September 3, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bookmarked
September 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bookmarked. Thanks.
September 3, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can someone - ANYONE - in the MSM call fucking Fournier out?! His lapdogging has gone beyond ridiculousness and needs to be singled out as shilling.
September 3, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's a little late to try and jump on the "change" bandwagon.
Also, what does she think about McCain's anti-ANWR stance?
September 3, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steve Schmidt will straighten him out on that.
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
your kind of right, I dont think her attacks are going to work. And change is definitely owned by obama
Video: Hot Mic, Republicans Bashing Sarah Palin
September 3, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Guess that means she "looks down" on the poor people, mostly black, for whom Barack was responsible as a community organizer. But they are city folk of color, so the hell with them, right?
September 3, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody but the republican base likes Palin. Noonan and Murphy aren't fond of her---what does that say about Palin.
September 3, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
It says McCain is screwed. To nail down the base he had to disenfranchise moderates. But such is the state of the Republican Party today. A civil war is coming.
And the idea that this lightweight could be a heartbeat away from the presidency is nauseating. But at least they've latched onto the Democratic case for presidency. There's an old adage: In an election between a Democrat and a Republican pretending to be a Democrat, bet on the Democrat.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
September 3, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not fond is putting it mildly.
I heard the disgust in Nooners' voice.
September 3, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who really looked down on small town America?
Who let the corporations take the jobs to China?
Who let the health care and education system go into the gutter?
Who started an unjustified war that took innocent lives and unlimited amounts of money?
Who insists in keeping an oil addiction and destroy the planet in the process?
September 3, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
And this is how the Obama-Biden campaign should handle this.
September 3, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have you heard anything out of the Republican convention that isn't a bald faced lie or the complete inverse from the truth? It's been so bad I fully expect it to be revealed that Palin really spent the first 30 years of her life living in Los Angeles after she makes this speech tonight or something. They are just incapable of anything but spin and dishonesty.
September 3, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
wow, she just offended everyone whos a community organizer and just defended everyone who lost their jobs due plants closing, because Obama and community organizers are the type of people who actually help hard working Americans.
Video: Hot Mic, Republicans Bashing Sarah Palin
September 3, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I meant,
just OFFENDED everyone who lost their jobs due plants closing
September 3, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does Palin look down on urban poor?
September 3, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I grew up in small town Iowa and one thing people of a small town know is just how little work it requires to be mayor.
September 3, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heh, I was just thinking the same thing.
It's like she's trying to appeal not so much to small-town America, but rather to country-club Republicans' assumptions about what small-town America must be like.
September 3, 2008 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of being a small town mayor, they hired a town manager to run things in her town because she had too many problems doing it on her own. In my experience, most smaller towns don't have powerful mayor type of governments. What they have is a board of selectmen, and a mayor, who is sometimes elected by the people, and sometimes chose by the board to be first selectman, acting as mayor. In these towns, most of them now have a Town Manager who acts as the CEO of the town, handling the nuts and bolts of running the town & making plans, and answering to his 'board of directors, the Town Board of Selectmen. How did she ever get elected Governor?
September 3, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
shhhhh ... we want her to leave that in there and drive home how they really feel. don't post commentary that could lead them to pull that line.
September 3, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry...do they actually READ the comments here?Their eyes are probably burning if they do...
September 3, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've actually heard that "elite/liberals looking down on small town America" crap elsewhere.
A nice comeback to the swipe at Obama's community organizing would be to do a spot w/ some of the people he actually helped? Although, I think it is a mean-spirited, bitchy line that will actually backfire...
But, what do I know?
September 3, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess they figured out finally that no one bought the sexism smear, so might as well go back to the tried and true elitism.
Those bitters, clinging to their guns and religion.
September 3, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps I'm a worry-wart, but these excerpts seem like the kind of down-home "wisdom" that might actually move a lot of people who are on the fence about Palin squarely behind her. Am I just being paranoid?
September 3, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh goodness gracious...this speech is clearly going to be very weak on substance. Most of her assertions in these short excerpts are demonstrably false. She is opening up McCain for so many lines of attacks its not even funny.
I can see the ads now...touting Obama's experience as a community organizer helping put people back into jobs after their jobs have been shipped overseas. That will resonate a lot more with voters in Ohio and other states that have been badly hit by John McCain's trade policies than Palin's experience as mayor trying to ban books and build a hockey rink.
I welcome her making her Mayoral experience an issue in this campagin, considering that her records SUCKS.
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right about substance.
Boo Hoo. Who is the whiner now?
September 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
but will the media call her on her bullshit after being shamed by the mccain campaign? i doubt it, they'll probably all just give it rave reviews.
September 3, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
*yawn*
still laughably/frighteningly/insultingly unqualified for the job.
September 3, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, you're right. Palin can do fake populism with brio, and this speech will tug at the heartstrings of a lot of people.
But they're still not going to want her one heartbeat away from the top job.
September 3, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
the media didn't start this fight with her. if she were vetted properly, she wouldn't be in this mess.
September 3, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain tells CBS that he may sue The National Enquirer for reporting that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband's business partner.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/mccain-threatens-to-sue-nation-1.php
Go to the link, and click it on up. Keep the pot boiling. McCain is the one who has drawn attention to the report, so let us help him and Sarah draw more attention to it.
Do your duty. Onward Christen Soldiers.
Click it on up. YUP! YUP!
September 3, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, I bet the tabloids are just getting started, too. They probably love having someone like Palin to write about.
September 3, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
O lord - please love me enough to make McLame sue; think of what would come out in depositions!!!
September 3, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
A question for the lawyers here:
I note that it says the McCain campaign threatened legal action, not the Palin Family.
First - does the McCain campaign have standing to sue?
And second - it sure looks like a non-denial by the Moose Dresser and the First Dude.
September 3, 2008 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, he doesn't - it wasn't him that is was said about.
He might be able to join as a party because it also affected his campaign. But I don't think he can sue alone - but that's just off the cuff for me -
September 3, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I thought - so this is all just bluster, hoping to scare off the National Enquirer.
It still leaves screaming silence from the Palins...
And did you see the Enquirer's reponse? They rock.
I love that response.
September 3, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where can I find this? I must read it immediately.
September 3, 2008 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain can't sue; not unless the story has him involved in some substantive capacity (in other words, if it alleged that he was personally acting as a chaperone during Gov. Palin's assignations with this guy).
September 3, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
The National Enquirer, that bastion of liberal elite media!
September 3, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The National Enquirer, that bastion of liberal elite media!
September 3, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is exactly what America needs: More wedge politics, more divisiveness, more hate. Because the last 8 years of Rove/Bush/Cheney haven't given us enough.
September 3, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't worry, we're well on the way to tossing out the 'divide and conquer" people.
(wanted to say "divide and conquerors" but would that make sense?)
September 3, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign needs to come back and say so my opponents is looking down on community organizers.
September 3, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ms. Palin will give an acceptable speech tonight. In fact, with her TV experience, she will shine. The speech will be the best work of some of the best conservative speech writers in the country. She will hit all the right wing high spots and we will have great โapplauseโ lines. To the folks in the hall, she will lift their spirits and their hearts. But she, unlike Obama, will not have authored the speech nor will it some how infuse her with what she lacks in the worldly experience.
It is easy for the right to criticize Obama for his oratory skills. It was easy for the left to criticize Reagan for his exceptional skills. But unless there is substance behind the words and after you have left the podium, then you can simply be seen as an actor. Look at Fred Thompson. Good speaker. Good actor. But, when pressed for specifics on an issue, he is looking for the cue cards.
And McCainโs speech on Thursday night will be such a let down, the maybe Stephen Colbert is right. It should be the Palin/McCain ticket.
Obama has substance and it truly scares the McCain camp and the Republican Party.
Earlier this week, I thought McCain would have no choice but to dump Palin before tonight. That is not going to happen. So, they will press on and finally Palin will come out of her bubble and have to answer questions. She will successfully field the softballs but it will take some real work by some good reporters to try to drill down to the point where it becomes evident there is no substance.
After this week of being so far off message, the McCain campaign will have no choice but to come out swinging and the big republican dollar 527โs will throw their best punches. It will be shameless and shameful.
September 3, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was interested in my elderly mother's reaction to Thompson's speech because it creeped me out. She reacted the same way. That war story stuff is no winner with women and probably not with a lot of men either.
We'll see on Palin. My hope is that the majority of women are going to see if for what it is, a cheap attempt to con them and treat them like they are stupid.
September 3, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, my mom would have loathed this woman - my mother hated phonies and hypocrites = that's where I get this - so I can't gage older ladies but I know women and this woman is a phony and not a nice woman and it sticks out all over her.
That's what I'm getting both from her and from the reactions to her.
September 3, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
They fired a lot of their guns already, to little effect. What else to their oppos have on Obama that hasn't already been aired? I suspect, not much, so they'll lather and repeat.
On the other hand, the drip drip drip is turning into whitewater rapids for Ms Palin and it has nothing to do with Bristol & redneck Levi's incipient bundle of joy.
In the end, Rove and his disciples will have caused McCain to lose again.
September 3, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
as a returned peace corps volunteer who served this country for 27 months putting foward a good face towards to developing world as to what it means to be an eager and helpful young america, i am offended by that community organizer line.
I guess while i was busy organizing my rural community to start a running water project she was busy banning books, being for the bridge to nowhere, making her employes take loyality test, but what do i know, i guess i didn't have any responsibilites
September 3, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
September 3, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL, this makes her line even better
September 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Slightly off topic but if anyone wants a great rundown on Alaskans, their views and the AIP go to Mudflats blog.
As a former Alaskan he nails it better than I ever could.
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/the-alaska-independence-party-we-are-outta-here/
September 3, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the Potemkin candidate. She was created by Rove acolytes to be the "hockey mom" the "reformer" and "small town values" mom. In reality she ran a cnyical campaign in a small town to become mayor and then move up the food chain by taking the right jobs, working for the right people and appearing in the right places. She isnt any of the BS memes the MSM is spinning. She is a plant. A plain and simple fraud. The idea a woman with the right wing ideals of Jerry Falwell can appeal to working class dem women? It is a gigantic fallacy. I sense the MSM will genuflect in an ugly, ugly way tonight and this race will get closer in the "polls". I am getting bad vibes about this.
September 3, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I know - it was Rove and
People - we're DOOOOOOOOoooooooooomed!!!!!!!1
September 3, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
But they just love to find these ignorant people that they can put in office and then control.
See: George W. Bush
September 3, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok. If going to a big medical center when my water has broken, and going there right away, means small town America will feel looked down on... well... I simply have to say... that's what all good medical advice tells us.
These folks are desperate! Small towns. That's what they're after? They're gonna dis the cities? They're gonna dis the people who live in them?
Ok.... Remind me again about how small towns in many places are getting smaller. Remind me how many young people are for Obama - and leaving small towns.
We love small towns! Just can't find work in them!
September 3, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
what a nightmare election cycle for Republicans. people will watch tonight; heck, I'm going to watch tonight. and for a PTA hockey mom small town mayor, Palin will give a decent speech. But as a VP nominee? not so much.
Pundits are hedging their bets by setting low expectations. I'm going out on a limb to say that Palin's speech will underwhelm. the words aren't hers and she isn't that good of an actress.
September 3, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actress is right!
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/unsurprised.html
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Unsurprised
"No Surprises From Palin, McCain Team Says"-Washington Post
Senior McCain officials described themselves as "unsurprised" today as huge storms of locusts flew from Wasilla, Alaska and descended upon McCain campaign headquarters. "Locusts were vetted. Locusts were vetted in the vet" said one campaign official, who spoke without attribution out of concern that he would be devoured by a verminous flying cloud. The campaign also described as "expected" reports that the rivers were running black with ashes, that family pets were begin to speak in human voices, declaiming "Release Sarah!", and that a huge spreading stain was beginning to blot out the Northern sun. "Vetted" said the campaign.
"There are exciting new studies that show that locusts can be used as a source of biodegradable fuel" said Newt Gingrich, as he hunkered down to avoid the black marble obelisks falling from the sky around him. "Palin, if she can be said to have played a role in bringing about these new biofuel resources, should be praised for her innovative role in the solution to our future energy demands".
"These events firmly demonstrate Palin's deep connection to traditional modes of traditional expression, in traditional forms, traditionally." said William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard. "Experience, in the face of these more traditional events, is overrated..." continued Kristol, before ending the interview to wrap himself head-to-toe in mosquito netting and swallowing a bitter tasting anti-malarial drug, the taste of which, as his lips contorted, he noted to be "surprisingly refreshing."
Palin's schedule in the upcoming days of the Republican National Convention has been cut short due to, as one McCain communications aide reported, a desire not to "let the magic out of the bottle too quickly." "Sarah is a precious resource, who each moment brings a new vitality and energy to every worker on the campaign" said the aide, while fighting to remove the nest of serpents which had suddenly materialized on the floor beneath him, and were now slowly ascending his legs. "Do these bite, or just slink?" asked the aide, who spoke on conditions of anonymity so as not to provoke or otherwise alienate the reptiles.
Meanwhile, as the heavens darkened, the seas began to boil, and a voice tore through the clouds shouting, in deep, stentorian tones to one and all: "It was a Mistake!", campaign offices described themselves as "unperturbed". "Serpents materializing, house pets suddenly called to vocal advocacy, celestial callings to revise and repent...Vetted" said the spokesman, speaking on condition of anonymity as he was turning into a pillar of salt. "Everything that was vetted was vetted in the vet."
Cite:
Head of State:
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/unsurprised.html
September 3, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus, could you stop spamming every thread here with that stuff?
Here's a hint: I've seen it 20 times already and I still haven't read it. nor do I intend to.
September 3, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seconded.
September 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
My grandmother used to tell me something like, "If you don't have anything nice to say about yourself, then..."
Or maybe I'm getting that wrong.
September 3, 2008 7:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought for sure that there was no way that she could do poorly tonight given the low expectations and supportive crowd, but having her go on the attack as is very risky. If she comes across as likable, people on the fence might give her the benefit of the doubt, but if she comes across as too angry, then they haven't done themselves any favors.
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gawd, I wish the menfolk would shut up telling me how women think.
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is the over and under on the number of times we will hear tonight that "Sarah Palin hit a home run"? I am betting on triple digits.
September 3, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I grew up in a small town in Iowa. I'm the product of a small town. I don't look down on her experience-- I'm just smart enough to know her experience has nothing to do with running for President of the United States.
Besides, adherence to small town values will naturally lead you to vote for Obama.
Sarah Palin should stop pretending she's better than all the other women in this country. Ms. Palin you totally disrespect the worthy American women before you.
September 3, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
More Palin corruption & cronyism:
http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/3/9330/95523/364/584429
September 3, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read it and 99% of links are from the guy who lost the race to her? Is that a big deal or no matter?
September 3, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bluebell
Gawd, I wish the menfolk would shut up telling me how women think.
If that ever happened, half of my gender would have very little to say!
Of course, that would be a good thing and the rest of us might learn something!
September 3, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wasn't clear that I didn't mean people here. I was watching Tom Brokaw tell us how waitresses out in Kansas think. Apparently, they all think they'd like to be VP in their spare time.
September 3, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, they have better health care...
September 3, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and left the town of 7,000 $20 million in debt.
Way to fulfill "actual responsibilities."
September 3, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
You snobs! I'm proud that Sarah Palin shares the small-town values I learned, growing up in my home town of Peyton Place.
September 3, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thoughts while reading the post: "Is this a troll? Is this a troll? Is this troll? LOL."
September 3, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, we used to get up every morning at 5 am in order to assert executive privilege.
Then we'd fire a police chief, intimidate a librarian, shoot a moose, and field-dress it for breakfast.
September 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
And still have time to ban some books from the library and get some sweeeeeet earmarks from the feds. And if it's a good day we'll make the separate from the union meeting at 8pm.
September 3, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Left unspoken: Like me, for instance.
Why didn't she say like "John and I"?
September 3, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that "promote change" line is really, really weak. The "small town" line is a good one, though shouldn't be too tough to refute. I'm hoping Obama will be quick to hit back.
September 3, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
With Americans losing their jobs and their homes and unable afford healthcare all we hear from Palin is about her make believe drama with the media
Yes Obama was a proud community organizer giving back to the community. That job prepared him well to understand the needs to people everywhere. It prepared him well for life in politics.
Palinโs job before she got into politics was a local sportscaster. That prepared her how?
September 3, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
8 yrs ago, the GOP gave us a governor from a large oil producing state who was a Christian conservative and a crusader. He had no national or foreign policy experience and had barely traveled abroad. Later he wanted to finish Gods plan in Iraq to civilize those heathens by military force. He is a creationist who does not believe global warming is man-made. He is strongly anti-choice and a darling of the evangelicals for he shared their values. Nothing else mattered, and thats the experience they are touting.
Sounds familiar?
September 3, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ann Richards get the last laugh...
September 3, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can somebody pleeeeease explain to me what a "HOCKEY MOM" is?? Is that something like a "soccer mom"? What, is she running for prime minister of Canada?? HUH, Soccer Mom? Are you kidding me? Is that supposed to be endearing in some way?
September 3, 2008 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, we just look down on you Sarah.
September 3, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's going to say all of this with THAT voice???
September 3, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Touche.
September 3, 2008 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like a great speech...if you're running for president of your senior class. I wonder if she'll make air quotes when she says "news flash."
September 3, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder if she will clap for herself again like she did during her only (and identical) speeches last week.
September 3, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
ANCHORAGE โ Tuesday I picked up a stack of cds that hold all of the meeting minutes, agendas, resolutions and legislation from Gov. Sarah Palinโs time as mayor of her hometown, Wasilla. Apparently, Sen. John McCainโs campaign hadnโt thought to do the same before tapping Palin.
Mike Lillis and Matt DeLong are pitching in to help me comb through everything. One of the interesting documents weโve come across so far is the memorandum from 2000 (available here) outlining why the town should hire a federal lobbyist. According to the document and accompanying contract, it looks like the lobbyist started about four and a half months sooner than previously disclosed. The city council approved a $15,000 initial budget for the plan without much fanfare. The item passed unanimously and without public discussion, along with a list of other more mundane city politics business, according to meeting minutes from Feb. 14, 2000.
The resolution explains that the firm, Robertson, Monagle & Eastbaugh, had been successful in getting money federal money for a neighboring city. As The Washington Post reported this week, the lobbyist from the firm eventually assigned to Wasilla, Steven Silver, had worked on Sen. Ted Stevensโ staff. I just spoke with the cityโs current mayor, Dianne M. Keller, who confirmed that Silver is still the townโs federal lobbyist.
In 2000, the city wanted money for a variety of public works and safety projects, plus โweaponsโ for its small police force:
The city could use the assistance of a lobbyist to receive appropriations with a number of projects including: $6.6 million for Wasilla Water Utility Improvements, two 12-inch wells, well pump houses, 3-million-gallon reservoir and transmission mains; $3.2 million Urban Storm Retention and Lake Water Quality Improvements, three lift stations, oversizing for pipes (Parks Hwy), side road connections; and $90K for various Wasilla Police Department safety equipment, communication needs and weapons.
The hire was a smart move. Between 2000 and 2003, Wasilla received $11.9 million in federal money, plus another $15.9 million in money specifically for transportation improvements. During that time, Sen. John McCain, a strong opponent of the earmarking system, complained three times about specific earmark projects heading for Wasilla, The Los Angeles Times reports today.
Palin has positioned herself as a reformer, announcing how she killed the infamous โbridget nowhere earmarkโ โ without mentioning her initial support for the project. Sheโs got some serious repositioning to do to pull off the fiscal-reformer image.
http://www.washingtonindependent.com/4114/wasilla-lets-hire-a-lobbyist-to-get-weapons-etc
September 3, 2008 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone pointed out that she would still be horrendously inexperienced even if she were mayor of a major city, let alone a small town?
Hell, remember, Biden destroyed Guiliani by pointing out that he's the least qualified person in the world to be President. And he was mayor of New York City!
Let's look at Alaska; NYC; and Wasilla.
Population
683,478; 8,274,527; 5,469. NYC has a population over a thousand times larger than Wasilla.
Gross product
$39.9 billion; $952.6 billion; untabulated.
Government budget
$11.2 billion; $43.3 billion; ~$6 million. Wasilla's budget isn't even a rounding error of NYC's budget; it's the error of the estimation of the error.
Government employees
~15,000; ~250,000; 52.
And Guiliani, I remind you, was bashed all around for being ridiculously inexperienced! (Though, looking back he made similar arguments to Palin. With more veracity, because the NYC police do have overseas agents.)
September 3, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's becoming clearer now how McCain plans to use Palin. I read some blurb about her visiting Florida and then off to rural areas (add small town to that, I think) in battleground states.
This is where her appeal will be strongest. It is very common to find a rural/small town versus metro areas in a lot of states--Missouri is just one example. The votes split with the GOP getting the outlying areas with the metro areas going to the Dems; suburbs have been the swing vote.
Palin will be used to shore up turnout in these areas. Going against this strategy will be the very high number of Dem campaign offices that have been opened in these areas--in Missouri most of these areas haven't seen a Dem campaign office in decades and opening an office draws a big crowd and good relations.
My two cents....
September 3, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
VERY interesting. Thanks for the tip...
September 3, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
You strike upon a core problem with Sarah Palin: she cannot magically erase Obama's ground organization, nor his money machine. Her extremism assures this org will be fortifying itself. As you point out, because they have been there for so long, they have become part of the community.
I see real conflict on MSNBC's set on what to do. Matthews and Keith CLEARLY want to get to the readiness questions. Not the goo. The real problem with someone ignert of federal governance and world affairs.
Meanwhile, Uncle Tom thinks he's in charge now that Tim has left us. And he told Chuck Todd to mind his Ps and Qs until....well, until Uncle Tom says so, that's when.
She will be shredded, and she won't even be aware of it.
'This is over.' - Peggy Noonan, a speechwriter for Reagan who did not need to see another speech to understand the Truth.
September 3, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the same Hillary strategy during the primary. Bill would visit the rural towns railing against elitism.
September 3, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, it was what the GOP did in 2004 to mobilize and solidify the base. I was in OH then and saw their ground game to get the rural votes out unfolding (which was a clear indication Kerry was in trouble in OH).
Of course, the difference is Kerry didn't even try in rural OH, while Obama has his ground organization going.
September 3, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Actual responsibilities".....I guess, under Palin's definition, those include trying to get books banned at the local library and hiring lobbyists to scrounge for federal earmarks, all the while claiming to be for "small government."
September 3, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
By belittling community organizers, Palin has lost the argument she raised.
September 3, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh heeeeeeere we go....
Tom Brokow must have had an off-camera chat w/Chuck Todd.
Now the meme is, "Unless there is a whole lot more than Troopergate, there's no problem with Sarah Palin."
September 3, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
So "unexperienced" is positive for Palin (who must be able to function as President) but negative for Obama? Very strange.
September 3, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I grew up in small town America. We all moved away to get away from popularity starved, un-enlightened A-holes like Sarah Palin. It's not that we look down on small town America, it's that small town America looks down on themselves and takes it out on the rest of us.
With $1.65 in federal money received for every $1.00 paid, Alaska is a small town - but for such a small town it sure sucks hard on the government tit - especially since she raised local sales taxes and taxed the oil companies, too. I question how someone who uses other peoples' money to solve her budget problems going to help with the kind of fiscal reform we need, especially given that McCain admits to not understanding the economy.
Oh... the yearly term for Alaskan Governor is only 90 work days. So she has about 140 working days as governor under her belt - I've worked more days in the past 6 months. How about you? How much did you learn in 6 months on your fist real job? Enough to be CEO?
September 3, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
We don't look down on small towns. But we sure as hell look down on people who saddle small towns with burdensome debts, or fire small town department heads without cause, or get small towns into frivolous lawsuits that they're assured of losing, or who attempt to run small town governments in a dictatorial way that freezes out peoples' input.
Because we move to small towns looking for an escape from big city financial shenanigans, looking for department heads who are actually empowered to serve the public, looking for government that avoids drama, and looking for elected officials who actually listen to their citizens.
I know. I moved to a small town myself. I only moved back to the city out of necessity (graduate school).
September 3, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am so damn sick of these smug Republicans. They are patronizing women with this ridiculous VP choice (Palin -- "I can't answer anything until someone tells me exactly what it is that a VP does) (are you effing kidding me???!!!), now they are patronizing Obama's community organizing, but wait, aren't they encouraging community service especially in the wake of Gustav, at the same time (hypocrites) and they don't have an ounce of substance running through this convention. It's not gonna work!!!
The one word that came to my mind last night after all of these less than exciting speeches is: UNDERWHELMING
After Obama's speech my feeling in one word, or two was: ELATED or INSPIRED
And will someone please explain to me why McCain's camp keeps driving this POW trash? It happened 40 years ago, and guess what? McCain lived and survived it. I say get over it! Consider yourself lucky and move on. Bad things happen to ordinary Americans every single day and they don't survive. I think it's a disgrace how he's patting himself on his own back when men and women are overseas everyday from serving this "country they put first" and are actually DYING!!!! The nerve of this party makes me sick to my stomach.
It's ok though, regardless of what happens in November (please God let it be Obama!!) I know I'm on the side that respects and carries on with dignity.
What party smears their own candidates??
It's beyond me and I just don't see how so many people fall for it again and again.
September 3, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The term Mayberry Machiavelli just popped in my head for some odd reason. Double snark....
September 3, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The best description of the Bush administration ever. The fact it was coined by the person they brought into to head the faith based initiatives was icing on the cake.
September 3, 2008 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I look up and respect the position of Vice President. I've gotta believe that even the lowest low-info republican can see she is indisputably unqualified for the VP role. Someone needs to tell her, girlfriend you are way, way out of your league.
Her arrogance is astonishing. I'm stunned. How can someone who didn't even bother to apply for a passport until 2007 expect to represent this country on the world stage? Mix with world leaders, converse intelligently regarding the complex cultural and political upheavels we have in the world? She doesn't even believe in science, denies global warming.
This woman is totally off her trolley. Oh well.
September 3, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
office of VP... should have corrected before posting.
September 3, 2008 8:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, Guiliani said it was a "job interview"...
September 3, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
My mother had five children...it didn't qualify her to be Vice President of the United States...IT QUALIFIED HER TO BE THE MOTHER OF 5 CHILDREN....
September 3, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know that comment was random as hell...but it's really true!
September 3, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
It made me laugh outloud - honest! I loved it.
September 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It made me laugh outloud - honest. I loved it~
September 3, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great minds laugh ALIKE! :)
September 3, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's camp hasn't officially blasted Palin yet. I think they're waiting to counterpunch so they can't be accused of sexism.
I expect the gloves to come off after she takes the first swing tonight.
September 3, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been saying all week that they'll hold their fire until she makes it official - when the words 'I accept the nomination' issue from her lips.
Then, no backsies. She'll find out damn quick what a position for the #2 office in the land is about.
They'll de-bark this small-town political hustler in record time, and I'll enjoy every second of it.
September 3, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dammit. What a campaign for the #2 office is all about.
Stupid fingers...
September 3, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy Shit - 140 working days as governor of a state which has an entire population significantly lower than the City of Dallas.
Can this really be happening?
September 3, 2008 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The sad part about it is she's gonna be the "Commander in Chief" when McAARP isn't able to be.
September 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have more people under my staff at work.
September 3, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
omg, pure red meat for the base -
she's not even gonna attempt to 'tell her story'
this is the speech of someone still trying out for her own party
September 3, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The real agents of change."
Do they really think they can takeover "change" this late in the game? Did they not watch the Dem primaries?!
September 3, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Listening to Meg, they speak to people who are are making enough to make it and are not threatened with a future loss of this ability. During times of prosperity, tapping into this basic selfish streak is effective, but when your argument is that what we offer is a govt that lets you keep the money you have, and you have no money to speak of to pay your mortgage, prescriptions, etc. it falls flat.
September 3, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
In a very ironical sense, they certainly are agents for change.
We've not seen a Vice Presidential candidate like this in almost 30 years and Eagleton wasn't like this, really - she's one hell of a change alright.
Jesus wept!
September 3, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
People getting health insurance gets from the delegates a...murmur. Yeah they give a shit about you.
September 3, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
why McCain's camp keeps driving this POW trash
I'm waiting for the MSM to wise up to war heroes, like McShame.
There once was a guy named MacArthur. He was a big hero during WWII in the South Pacific (Medal of Honor no less) and rose to be General of the Army. While serving under Truman during the Korean conflict, he publicly disagreed with the President. Truman cut his nuts off in public. Seems that being a war hero from WWII didn't carry any weight back then. So I wonder what changed during the Vietnam conflict that entitles McShame to special treatment? After all MacArthur was a 5-star General and McCain was only a Lt.
September 3, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
AAAAAAARRRRGHHHHH!!!
is anyone else watching MSNBC?? [paraphrasing] brokaw and todd: "troopergate isn't a big deal ... it's just a little petty sideshow, and if there isn't more than has been turned up, it's nothing."
AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGHHH!!
September 3, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
IT's alright - don't let them get to you.
They are paid agents of the powers that be - the Repugs. Americans don't pay that much attention to them - the trust level for the press is lower than it is for all of our government.
September 3, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's shameful, but there is real conflict there. Maybe Chuck Todd will knuckle under, but Keith won't (Brokow keeps admonishing him on-air; it's getting old). Chris wants a piece, too.
To dismiss an ethical investigation that goes to the core of her skills as an executive so blithly assures the delivery, fresh from the stable floor, the EXACT same MSM steaming pile that gave us W and Iraq.
Tom Brokow, shut up. I knew Tim Russert. Tim Russert was a friend of mine. You are no Tim Russert.
September 3, 2008 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brokaw is an ass and he's always been an ass, but he's become a much bigger ass the older he's gotten.
September 3, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
why McCain's camp keeps driving this POW trash
I'm waiting for the MSM to wise up to war heroes, like McShame.
There once was a guy named MacArthur. He was a big hero during WWII in the South Pacific (Medal of Honor no less) and rose to be General of the Army. While serving under Truman during the Korean conflict, he publicly disagreed with the President. Truman cut his nuts off in public. Seems that being a war hero from WWII didn't carry any weight back then. So I wonder what changed during the Vietnam conflict that entitles McShame to special treatment? After all MacArthur was a 5-star General and McCain was only a Lt.
September 3, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Despite the way he uses the POW, the suffering he experienced while a POW resonates with a huge part of their viewing public. It's all about the ratings.
September 3, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like MSNBC sent a memo to stop beating up on Palin.
Keith and Rachel - time to ride to the rescue!
September 3, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The legacy of the Hillary Clinton blowback.
September 3, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well as Senator, Obama represents small towns in Illinois. So I don't know what she is talking about. There are a lot of underlying assumptions that are being in these excerpts. If you want to generate undestanding you don't go dissing urban areas.
September 3, 2008 8:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should have proofread the comment
It should be read:
Obama is the Senator of Illinois that not only includes Chicago bit small towns as well. So Palin's criticism is rather stupid. Palin is making a lot assumptions about Obama and it is up to him and his surrogates to counteract them.
September 3, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Dems hate small towns! And then she follows it up w/ an equally meanspirited line implying that anyone who's ever done community service is a sap. I bet there are a LOT of Rs who've done community organizing/service that should be offended.
September 3, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama campaign ought to come back with some homey, entertaining, endorsements from mayors of small towns. Somebody track down the Mayor of Lake Woebegone.
September 3, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
They just played "Everyday People" by Sly and the Family Stone at the convention. Never thought about it, but diversity really is what the GOP is all about.
September 3, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!
September 3, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
oops, all-American image not showing up... anyway,
this seemed apropos.
September 3, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or has McSame completely surrounded himself around big business and CEO's. The lady who spoke first was a CEO of something, can't remember what. And this Fiorina was CEO of Hewlett Packard. Hmmmmm? Just though I'd ask...anyone have any insight?
September 3, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or has McSame completely surrounded himself around big business and CEO's. The lady who spoke first was a CEO of something, can't remember what. And this Fiorina was CEO of Hewlett Packard. Hmmmmm? Just though I'd ask...anyone have any insight?
September 3, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a huge blunder this speech is. This is her first big speech in public. Instead of trying to appear likable or a regular person people can relate to, she's already going negative???
As someone mentioned, it's all redmeat for the base. Why does she still need to preach to the converted? Gosh, the McCain camp is all gut, not brains.
My prediction: The wingnuts eat it up, say it was a big hit. But Joe and Jane Sixpack will think she's a bit of a jerk and a weirdo.
September 3, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
We've seen three snippets of a 20 minutes (or so) speech. Palin is going to be good, possibly really good.
September 3, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The race starts Friday. Palin will nail her speech tonight, and McCain will have folks in tears on Thursday as he recounts his POW days.
Schmidt's temper tantrum worked as the "news" media has been told to stop reporting the news on Palin.
Obama/Biden better try and frame Palin, because she's going to get a head start tonight. And as Davis has said, it's not about issues, it's about personalities and War Hero McCain and Super Mom will have folks eating out the palm of their hand.
the GOP ain't no dummies. As Obama has said, they know how to win elections.
September 3, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't buy the facet regarding the press. Maybe a few are cowed, but as a whole they are pissed off that they can't get access. And the longer they hold her away from them the more intense they will be to create a story to make her talk to them.
September 3, 2008 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. A successful speech will grant her a reprieve. Ok. But if the McCain camp continues to stonewall the press, it might ugly for her again. I've seen her interviewed - she comes across quite well. Of course, she's talking only about Alaska.
September 3, 2008 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with camus here. They're doubling down on the culture war and the war against the press.
Does that strategy remind you of anyone?
Stonewalling investigations, fake folksiness, railing against the liberal media . . . we've had that crap out the kazoo for eight years. And the press has had that crap for eight years, more to the point. If they go down that road, they're going to throw McCain's "maverick" cred in the crapper.
September 3, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's the Commander CooCoo Bananas parallel universe, starring Gramps 'n Gidget.
September 3, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
She should also add, "When I became mayor I didn't know what to do so I hired a city manager to perform my duties as I ordered".
According to the city council members she did not know what to do, even her mother-in-law noted this, so she had someone else do it.
September 3, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
If she delegates all her responsibilities if she becomes president, I will be pleased.
If she tries to influence policy in any way, we're doomed.
September 3, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
As you listen to Palin tonight, you will be hearing the words of Mathew Scully.
From Scully's website:
http://www.matthewscully.com/matthew.htm
Matthew Scully served until August 2004 as special assistant to the president and deputy director of presidential speechwriting. He worked for President George W. Bush a total of five years, including 18 months in the 2000 campaign, and was part of the team that drafted the Presidentโs post-September 11th addresses and every major speech of the first term.
Scully has also written for vice presidents Dick Cheney and Dan Quayle, presidential candidate Robert Dole, Arizona Governor Fife Symington, and the late Pennsylvania Gov. Robert P. Casey.
A former literary editor of National Review, his work has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The National Post of Canada, among other newspapers and magazines.
He is the author of Dominion: The Power of Man, The Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy (St. Martin's Press), named by The Atlantic Monthly as one of the ten best non-fiction works of 2002, and still available in paperback. He lives with his wife Emmanuelle in Los Angeles.
September 3, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's sounding a bit defensive, isn't she?
I'm not sure when community organizer became a bad thing but leave it to Republicans to make helping your community something to look down upon.
September 3, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fiaroni: "...they are concerned..." crowd is falling asleep. "She's asking us to care about other people for god's sake."
September 3, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, gregory is bar none the worst right-wing hack that I think that I have ever heard. No wonder he took it up the a** on the invasion of iraq and as did the american people. Chief white house correspondent???? Pathetic. He is not worthy of the label journalist. He should be fired by nbc. He would have a home at fox. What a pig.
September 3, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeeze, will these people learn how to read from a prompter without looking like a bunch of dopes - rehearsals are done for a reason - and Carly - don't smile on the applause lines . .
She knows John McCain and he didn't pick Carly
September 3, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bottom line so far: when they actually do get around to mentioning helping those in need, (close to) utter silence from crowd. What gets response: McCain is maverick and we'll fight the bad guys and won't tax you.
September 3, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotta love what Ron Reagan said about Obama and Palin. He really gave Palin a verbal clobbering.
Seems like Nancy Reagan is now an Obama fan too.
September 3, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reagans hated McCain for what he did to his first wife.
September 3, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yet apparently, Nancy is 'very, very good friends' with John McCain and endorsed him? According to her son, anyway... Of course, in politics, I guess the word 'friends' is debatable.
September 3, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to oonnect with Ron and get him out there on the television screen.
September 3, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed 100%.
I was watching Ron's interview and thinking how good this dude is for Obama. The Nancy-as-Obama-fan angle is worth exploring too. I think there's a small but significant undecided demographic to whom one Reagan or another's opinion would actually matter.
September 3, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the clips I've seen of her, looks like she can hold her own.
Barring a teleprompter malfunction - a la "Go fuck yourself, San Diego!" - she should be fine.
September 3, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anchorman reference. Loving it.
September 3, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm getting really tired of this "Liberals look down on the common folk" rhetoric, which really is code for "hate the antiamerican effete traitors in the cities".
Talk about stirring up class resentment. Isn't this what Republicans always "claim" Democrats are doing? Class warfare?
September 3, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's what I was thinking. It's really a nasty, thoughtless line and insulting to the people who have been helped by community organizers, not to mention the selfless work of the organizers. That one should backfire.
OTHO, a good response would be to say "you're right, I don't have any experience as a village mayor who hired a lobbyist to secure millions of federal taxpayer dollars, raised taxes, and left the village millions of dollars in debt."
Goddamn, if Obama doesn't jump on that, I'm going to be pissed. Because the fucking media is asleep at the wheel. Mathews looked like he was medicated today, just sat there and said "yeah" while some gooper repeated the lie that Palin said no to the bridge to nowhere.
People--CONGRESS KILLED THE BRIDGE EARMARK BEFORE PALIN EVEN TOOK OFFICE AS GOVERNOR, BUT SHE STILL TOOK THE MONEY! That's the real story--she didn't just support the bridge before she was elected and then said no--there wasn't a fucking bridge earmark to refuse by the time she was governor. Everyone needs to read the Daily Howler every fucking day, because Somerby points out inaccuracies and ineptitude even at decent sites like TPM. We're even stronger when we get the facts straight, and demand that the MSM get them straight as well.
September 3, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look at Josh's new post. McCain is grasping...the GOP is officially dead. Although, Mark Twain might disagree...
September 3, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, my inner liberal, which is just like my outer liberal, has special powers of discernment and I believe this is an ex-Party.
September 3, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did everyone see that Peggy Noonan..and Chuck Todd on HuffPo?:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/03/peggy-noonan-mike-murphy_n_123647.html
September 3, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah. we saw it. i don't remember where.
September 3, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What'd you think about it?
September 3, 2008 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
"political bullshit"--it's the only true thing I've ever heard Noonan say. Of course, she didn't think anyone was listening.
September 3, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
My God what a Party! I thought the Repubs were the tough guys (and gals)! They just can't handle any scrutiny at all without hiding behind charges of sexism and elitism. Oh, we just think Palin is a hick now and that's why she is getting investigated. Maybe we're not so gullible to believe all their talk of being reformers and mavericks and want the proof. If they can't handle the heat ... well, get lost! Just like a bully, once the Repubs get as good as they give they whine, "It's not fair!," and run behind the skirts of the referees.
September 3, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's another issue that Obama should be all over--they falsely attacked him for playing the "race card", while they've been playing the "sex card" every fucking day since she was chosen.
I am so fucking sick of no one calling them on this shit.
September 3, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
They've been playing the sexism card from 200 decks of nothing but sexism cards.
I've never heard such whining.
September 3, 2008 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
every fucking time they say that Obama doesn't have Palin's "experience", his campaign needs to reply that he doesn't have that "experience" by listing all of her scandals, lies, and contradictions.
September 3, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am on tape delay, but fire gregory now!!!!! What an ass. He should be tried for war crimes in any event. I really can't believe the garbage out of his mouth. He should totally be fired. Pathetic.
September 3, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Romney: We don't need a liberal Washington. We need a conservative Washington. WTF did we have for the last freaking 8 years? Cheese and rice.
September 3, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Romney: No promscruity in the Palin home? He's really pissing me off.
September 3, 2008 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did he just go over fed unions? Stupid.
September 3, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like a Nazi rally to me!
September 3, 2008 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Mitt, you sent all those jobs oversees and didn't grow up poor, or black .
September 3, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, Obama way up in Iowa and Minnesota in those polls, up by a couple in Ohio as well. Sorry if I appear pissed, I still assume Obama knows what he's doing--I just get sick of GOP bullshit not being refuted with basic facts.
Campbell Brown is my hero now--stay strong baby!
September 3, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
MSM could use a dozen more Campbell Browns.
September 3, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
The last time I checked one of the most elite institutions of higher education in the East is the US Naval Academy. It believe it is harder to win entrance than Harvard. Of course his buddy GW Bush went to Harvard Business School, as did Mitt Romney. Hmmm. Why then is McCain attacking the schools of his opponents and friends?
September 3, 2008 9:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The last time I checked one of the most elite institutions of higher education in the East is the US Naval Academy. It believe it is harder to win entrance than Harvard. Of course his buddy GW Bush went to Yale and thenHarvard Business School, as did Mitt Romney. Hmmm. Why then is McCain attacking the schools of his opponents and friends? Of course Sen. Obama got into Columbia and Harvard on his own not as a legacy.
September 3, 2008 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
The more things change the more they stay the same
In 1992 Marilyn Quayles convention speech criticized career women; that spring her husband criticized Murphy Brown. The blatant pandering that was the "culture war" of 1992 did little to change the minds of the millions who were enduring a recession.
Fast forward to 2008 career women are okay now. The "culture war" this time is being fought with the old weapon of abortion and little else. Middle America this time is looking at the price of gas, and groceries, and not fighting a "culture war" just fighting to survive.
Like Bush 41, who was no crusading evangelical, McCain is reading a script written by others; hoping no one remembers that he is not one of them.
This routine whipping up of the evangelical base is gamble, like Bush 41's 1992 strategy.
September 3, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to the speech excerpts, Palin says you're an elitist if you question her experience as a small town mayor in Alaska. However, in the same speech she demeans Obama's experience as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. By her logic, then, she's also an elitist.
I can't wait for the Obama campaign to jump all over that hypocrisy.
September 3, 2008 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Palin became mayor she cut her own salary by $4000, it was a lovely symbolic gesture. But at the same time she hired a city administrator. So she added that salary to the city rolls and basically farmed out the job of running the city to the administrator. I heard an interesting interview on air america today with an alternate for his wife who is an AK Ron Paul delegate. He is from Wasilla. He said that Sara Palin was really irresponsible. That she raised taxes and spends but hasn't really had to make any hard decisions. I honestly think that she is way out of her league. BUT he says the same thing they all have been saying in AK. Don't underestimate her. He ability to make people like her is uncanny.
September 3, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
God, I really hate the f*cking media. It is so pathetic and I am watching msnbc, the most "liberal" outlet. It totally sucks. I am going to freaking barf. Retch!
September 3, 2008 11:11 PM | Reply | Permalink