« NYT: Palin Personally Sought To Ban Book From Library | Home | Election Central Sunday Roundup »

Obama Raised More Than $66 Million In August

An Obama aide this morning sent over his fundraising number for August: More than $66 million, topping his previous best month of $55 million by $11 million or more.

The astonishing haul means Obama is more than on track to raise the $300 million or more that the campaign had intended to raise for the general election -- a total that required him to raise over $50 million a month, which he's succeeded in doing.

The total suggests that McCain's gains, and the choice of Sarah Palin, helped galvanize and expand Obama's donor base: The campaign reports adding half a million new donors this month. The haul could also help put to rest lagging questions about the strain that opting out of public financing had put on his fundraising operation.


211 Comments

| Leave a comment

And as each day passes with more info about Sarah and the thought of this person as President sinks in I wouldn't be surprised to see Obama get 80 million in September.

lets not get ahead of ourselves here...$80million?

Racially Biased Alert: Whitlock and DeMoss

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

Seeing as how old donors can donate again in September, I don't think 80 million in September alone is out of the question.

There are all those Hillraisers out there that Palin is probably pushing to Obama as we write.

user-pic

It won't make a damn bit of difference how much money Obama raises if he won't use any of it to attack McCain/Palin and the Republicans. They are commanding the field solely because Obama refuses to stand up like a man and fight for himself.

This is great news as long as the money is used to DESTROY the McCain campaign. When are the Democrats going to learn that they are not going to win a Presidential election by taking the moral highroad? I am starting to have second thoughts for supporting Obama over Hillary as she would be giving them a hell of a fight right now and not these nuanced discussions that we are seeing now. The Obama campaign must take control of the narrative of the campaign news cycle and destroy the McCain campaign. God knows there's plenty of stuff that can be used to destroy McCain's circus act. The question i does Obama and the Democrats have the guts to do it.

After what has been done in the last 8 years, we HAVE to WIN this election. I will continue to raise funds for Obama but the recent turn in polls is very ominous. I want to see the trends reversed and I want to see the McCain campaign mercilessly and incessantly attacked for being the lying, unpatriotic, hypocritical opportunists that they are.

Hillary said that "Obama can't win" because she felt that Obama will not be able to stand up to and defend against the Republican attack machine. It's time to prove her wrong.

Attack!

First! (I think)

Not... Second!

This is just a proof that the polls' relevance on elections coverage will be wiped out this November, thanks to the biggest fundraising and GOTV operation ever assembled.

We'll call it a tie.

And it says that the poll numbers we're seeing right now are probably giving a few percentage points too much to McCain.

"Advice" given by "anonymous Democrats", the guys who botched up Gore's, Kerry's and most recently Clinton's campaign? I'd ignore it too.

Sunday Morning, diseased troll jizz.

This would be probably true if we had 98% voter turnout.

user-pic

Oh, give up. Your boy McCain is not going to be president, OK? It just ain't going to happen.

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

user-pic

The Telegraphy is a right-wing rag. You might as well quoted Fox News.

user-pic

Let's try again:

The Telegraph is a right-wing rag. You might as well have quoted Fox News.

I think the Telegraph article makes a good point, we can't just assume the Bradley Effect will be offset by other things. Republicans realize this and that is why they are still playing the race card in subtle ways. They are doing it to remind a certain population of people "you don't want to vote for a black person". I don't put much stock in the fact that Palin has energized the evangelical base, its not like those people weren't going to vote GOP anyway, regardless of what they thought of McCain the Christian fundamentalists will not vote progressive. It is scary that she has pulled some of Obama's support from women however, especially given her background it just goes to show her background is not well known. Because there is no way any woman who was leaning towards Obama would vote for McCain because of Palin on the ticket given her fringe radical views, involvement in numerous scandals, secrecy and petty fights, how uninformed she is, etc.

The Obama camp has to start fighting dirty the way the Republicans are. They have to set out to destroy the Republicans, not just beat them.

user-pic

The Obama campaign is not even playing the same game. They're winning this election completely under the radar. Watch and be amazed. This will go down in history as one of the greatest political end runs of all time.

user-pic

From your keypad to God's ear! (And it's good to see your avatar again -- always brings a smile.)

Hey, the avatars are back!

So very NOT glad to see your sick one still littering these boards, you righty shill.

And just so you know some of what your disastrous righty shilling has gotten us into, check out the trailers for these docs.

http://www.iousathemovie.com/
http://www.flowthefilm.com/

user-pic

Hilarious!

Last week, the Telegraph told us Sarah Palin was going to be the energy czar...

She is. Didn't you know?

She already controls the US oil supply up there in Alaska and she can see all the Russian pipelines from her house.

Didn't you hear McCain saying "Sarah Palin knows more about energy than anyone in the United States" on The View Friday? Amazing statement considering the question was, "Senator McCain, why are you lying about every single subject that comes out of your mouth?"

I think this shows that Obama's base is HUGE and solid. I have no doubt his base will turn out to the polls.

Just the activity of his base: His volunteers, his voter registrations drives, his donations, they all dwarf McCain.

That's why I'm ignoring the polls. I believe they're being "fixed" to show a race closer than it is.

I don't doubt that his base will turn out. The big question is how many will show up to vote only to find out that they have been disenfranchised by the GOP, either through voter roll purges, through "broken" voting machines only in minority districts, through 5 hour voting lines, through fake absentee ballots, through Diebold trickery, etc....? The GOP is already starting their voting games in battleground states.

That's my fear. I really feel comfortable that Obama has awakened many, many people who previously haven't voted, but experience shows us that the evildoers among us can and will derail an election by creative restriction of voting rights.

user-pic

People are rising up and generating a lot of heat for any underhanded tactics, like vote caging and propaganda DVD's.

I've gotten one of each. And contacted the newspaper about the DVD bigotry. And our state is fielding irate calls and emails from voters who've received mcShame mailings with incorrect data.

This will not stand! Battleground folks, watch your mail closely! Stand up and complain! Spread the word.

Thera:
What newspaper? I used to work for a Hearst paper in Texas. I am sure they are probably doing it as well.

Joe

Sorry, but does the total really suggest "that McCain's gains, and the choice of Sarah Palin, helped galvanize and expand Obama's donor base"?

She was chosen on the 29th of August; the reporting covers only 3 days of her selection as VP. These were also when everyone was just really confused by the choice, most people weren't paying that much attention (on the weekend, although it was the weekend sandwiched by the DNC and RNC), and she hadn't started lying out of her ass, scaring Democrats and independents, and attacking community service yet.

If I'm reading this right, this total is the baseline before any Palin galvanization, including the haul Obama got from the DNC.

We weren't all confused. It was pegged immediately as a cynical ploy to grab PUMAs.

It would be of interest to see the proportion of donations that came in the last week of August.

Personally, I held my donation until that time.

Well, I wasn't confused either, it was just my read from everyone else ;)

I also donated the night of Obama's speech (and to Senator Clinton the night of hers).

The point remains, however, that I doubt very much that she initially generated a surge of donors for Obama. People just didn't know enough about her to get scared.

Good point, and ditto. My donations were in the 48 hours after Palin opened her yapper in such a partisan way at the RNC.

Original mavericks, my ass. My wife, who could give a sh*t less about the ads, was laughing yesterday at the "original mavericks" thing last night. It was nice to see ;-)

Oh, and speaking of ads, I haven't Obama's new one given any pub on this site in the last two days about McCain's ties to lobbyists. Probably his strongest ad yet. Love it! More of those, please!

user-pic

Yes, Palin made a difference. The Obama campaigned announced on Sep 4 they had received more than $10 million after Palin's speech. I think it's safe to say in that the remaining 2 days of August after her speech they took in enough to push them well over their previous record of $55 million.

In any event, Sarah will continue to motivate people like me to keep donating. Just read today's NY Times article on her. I'm not ready for Armegedon.

I see I was incorrect. For some reason I always associated the big 10 million dollar haul with her convention speech, not her introductory one.

You are right.

It was following her nasty convention speech, which was in SEPTEMBER, not August, that Obama received at least $10 million in 24 hours.

The September numbers will be huge, I bet. It is after the Dem base consolidated and got pissed off at McCain and Palin - the lying twins.

It is also when Dems started getting worried. I've heard of a lot of people who gave to Obama for the FIRST time after Palin's speech.

It WAS the convention speech that garnered the 10 mill haul. I think bvd is just saying she might have gotten O some more money after she was selected. The specific 10 million in one day will be reported in THIS month's haul though.

Sept 4th isn't in August my friend. That money won't be reported until the end of THIS MONTH. That 10 mill isn't even counted in the money the O camp raised. I think....

You weren't mistaken. The $10M haul was from the acceptance speech for Palin, not the initial one.

We do know that her choice brought in 10 million in the first day and a half after her selection. How many of the new donors made up this amount. And if the second day and a half he pulled in say another 4 or 5 million, Palin could be said to be have turned a 50 million month to a record breaking month.

I'm not sure the Palin galvinization (is that a word?) would be seen in the August numbers. The Obama campaign said that it received $10M in the 24 hours following her speech, but that was Sept 3.

The question now is whether the campaign finds the right spending balance between ads and GOTV.

Yeah the 10 million will be reflected in the September totals.

I was just about to comment with the same info. These are August fundraising numbers. This is the Unity/DNC bounce. The Palin bounce comes in next month numbers.

Clearly a sign of desperation from a flagging Obama campaign!

I would hope the Obama campaign will take that $66 million and destroy McCain before October 31.

user-pic

I'm sure we can do some very funny Halloween ads about The Corpse and Lady MacDeath.

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

Not a bad number at all. Not exactly the $100 million I was hoping for, but then, with people so nervous about the economy, it's all the more incredible. I just hope this means he has enough to keep up the advertising in some red areas, like Indiana and North Carolina, for a few more weeks even if it doesn't look good right now.

My guess is that they waiting until after the first debate (topic: foreign policy) to saturate the airwaves on issues of housing and health care. That's when most of the undecideds will begin engaging the election.

The campaign reports adding half a million new donors this month.

I didn't even catch this part. If that's true, and then are up to 2.5 million donors overall, that's simply incredible. Did Bush and Cheney get that high in 2004? I'd take it two ways. The first is that, for purely fund raising purposes, it means he has even more of a cushion. The election is about six weeks away, but if really found 500,000 new donors, an average contribution of $25 from each every two weeks is $12.5 million, or $25 million. That's just awesome, and if they really hold people up by the ankles in the next few weeks, I don't see how McCain can avoid being outspent. The second way I'd take it is, perhaps he's got a lot more underlying support than the polls suggest. Did McCain add anywhere near that number of donors in recent weeks? It's a 25 percent increase from where he was when he last announced. I don't know if the campaigns usually see a surge around this time, but even if they, is it usually that high? Either way, hearing this is a nice change of mind from where I was yesterday, when I thought we were going to lose.

Well, good for him, he needs that money in those red states for the 50 state strategy.

Your point being?

And again the "clumsy" media department of Obama and the strategists Plouffe and Axelrod, called out of their water with a national campaign several times in the last two weeks, show how it is done to lower expections only to shatter even the highest ones. Supplying the NYT with that "lagging fundraising" stuff while having raised more than anyone ever before was really, really cleverly done.

The campaign reports adding half a million new donors this month.

I didn't even catch this part. If that's true, and then are up to 2.5 million donors overall, that's simply incredible. Did Bush and Cheney get that high in 2004? I'd take it two ways. The first is that, for purely fund raising purposes, it means he has even more of a cushion. The election is about six weeks away, but if really found 500,000 new donors, an average contribution of $25 from each every two weeks is $12.5 million, or $25 million. That's just awesome, and if they really hold people up by the ankles in the next few weeks, I don't see how McCain can avoid being outspent. The second way I'd take it is, perhaps he's got a lot more underlying support than the polls suggest. Did McCain add anywhere near that number of donors in recent weeks? It's a 25 percent increase from where he was when he last announced. I don't know if the campaigns usually see a surge around this time, but even if they, is it usually that high? Either way, hearing this is a nice change of mind from where I was yesterday, when I thought we were going to lose.

user-pic

I see from Josh's post on the homepage that Palin is continuing to tell the lie about the bridge (and also, from the link, the campaign is continuing to lie about crowd size).

As pleased as I am that Josh pointed out that the earmark was killed in 2005, while Palin was a private citizen and before she even ran for governor, I repeat again: Josh, please post to the homepage the question that needs to be asked to shut down this horseshit once and for all. Influential media types - the types who might actually get to talk directly to Palin or the campaign - read the homepage. Obviously they need some pointers on the best way to pose a question about this serial lie. That question, once again is (and I've included your information from your update last night):

How, exactly, did you communicate to Congress your opposition to the bridge? Did you write a memo? A letter? Make phone calls? Hold press conferences? How, exactly, did you in 2005 - the year the earmark was killed - before you were even running for governor, as a private citizen hockey mom from Wasilla Alaska, let Congress know that you didn't want that bridge? And what evidence do you have that Congress heard you over the thousands of communications they get from private citizens each month?

I'm so sick of this shit. Make this bitch put up or shut up. She's a lying sack of shit, and she's only getting away with it because no one will ask the very simple question that will allow no outs.

And if you said "Thanks, but no thanks...if our state wanted to build that bridge, we would build it ourselves," why didn't you return the $200-plus million to Washington?

And why do you still have $73 million of that federal money salted away for the bridge project when you're saying if Alaskans want it they'll build it themselves?

user-pic

And just as much, or perhaps more, to the point: Palin campaigned on building the bridge; obviously she wanted it. Alaska got the entire amount of the original earmark except it was no longer specifically directed at the bridge...she killed it specifically because Alaska was going to have to pick up half of the tab. So Palin (Alaska) wanted the bridge, but in fact Palin (Alaska) had no intention of using Alaska's money to "build it ourselves". It's a lie on top of a lie on top of a lie.

Not to mention that you can't "kill" an earmark on money that isn't earmarked. "Earmark" has a specific meaning - which is, "you can only spend this money for this particular project". When Alaska got the money, there was no earmark on it. So make that a lie on top of a lie on top of a lie on top of a lie....

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

user-pic

As scary as the NYTimes (and WaPo) profile of Palin is, this one is scarier.

Not only does Palin exhibit the worst traits of George Bush; she's also in training to be the next Cheney.

Nice catch Jenn

Rudy 9/11 is parroting the line that the negative ads is Obama's fault because he didn't do the ten townhall meetings. Jerkwad.

If Meet the Press wants to book Rudy, fine, I have a remote control and know how to use it (I watched a guy skin a sheep to use it as a sleeping bag instead). But I have to say I find him an incredibly self-discrediting guest and the GOP doesn't really do itself any favors when they let him loose. I play a lot of poker. A lot. And I would love to sit at a table with Rudy because the man has the most transparent tells I have ever seen. His face is an actual caricature. He has absolutely no discipline over his composure. I know the partisan thugs at the GOP love Rudy's condescending act, but among the undecided it's not effective.

I'm encouraged that Obama will have the resources to remain competitive, because he'll need all he can get. I urge everyone who's not already doing so to budget whatever you can a week to keep the donations flowing.

The neocons who're now running McCain-Palin (it's really Palin-and-that-figurehead), are ginning up the culture wars like always. The "God, guns and gays" demographic is large and utterly impervious to any counter messages of hope and change, because they've been conditioned to see those as code for "liberal perverts want to ruin the America I love".

My main concern remains the influence of Obama's race in this whole thing, and it's a factor it too many minds, still. If you listen to the pollsters who probe the undecideds' reasons for still being undecided, it's not hard to hear a considerable amount of white fear. Fear of angry blacks being given power to exact revenge for a long history of injustice (which is ridiculous on its face, but I've heard older relatives and acquaintances say it nonetheless.) Fear of the demographic changes coming that will mean that this country won't be a white majority country in a few decades. These are the sources of much angst and fear and anger that Rove and his henchmen (and Nixon before them) have tapped into so effectively for decades.

This is why we can't be distracted and bamboozled into fighting the culture wars again, because that's fighting on the enemy's chosen ground.

Besides, that is phony ground, and the old tactics and arguments seem ever more extreme and obvious. People who try to survive, to thrive and raise healthy and educated children have more in common than that gives them credit for. But fear is in everyone, and Palin's choice was incredibly shrewd for how well her hard-Right, retro world view engergizes those who, like her, believe that the world can be divided into those right-thinking, Bible-believing, "traditional" American white people, and everyone else.

But like Frank Rich says this morning, she and Rove are not really new. They are merely exhuming a reactionary strain in American life that was so thoroughly discredited by a combination of the Great Depression and Joe McCarthy.

Today's practicioners of small-minded bigotry and rabid authoritarianism are smoother, more steeped in modern marketing and PR tactics, perhaps, but if anything, are more ruthless and lit with the fires of zealotry than those old boys were.

She's scary. Palin. But I'm seeing her as the leading edge of the wedge. McCain is nothing but a figure-head, a tool of the Old Order, meant to lend his war-hero image to the Restoration of a coalition of people and corporations who oppose most of the basic tenets of democracy, and who, if give power one more time, will surely seek to cement their power in ways that will be difficult to dislodge without violence and much suffering.

While it is obvious that neo-conservatives want to ride Palin back to the White House using the resentments of "small town Americans" against "elites" it would be wrong to assume that the rural vote is monolithic.

I grew up in a small town and it would not surprise me if there is a small but significant portion of rural voters who would tell pollsters that they will vote for McCain but in the privacy of the booth they vote for Obama. It would be the rural version of the bradley effect.

I grew up on a farm outside a town of 700, and live in a small town now, where there are more Obama yard signs than McCain/Palin signs. So, I'm not saying that small-town automatically means small-minded.

But I'm also intimately aware that there is plenty of "hockey mom", conservative Christian evangelical thinking around here, and the culture war attacks resonate.

What I find amusing is the attempt to romanticize rural and small-town values and pretend that they're all about good things. For all the good-hearted and generous nature of rural people that I know, there are always enough paranoid and jingoistic ones to balance out the equation.

We're not monolithic either way, but all I was trying to say is that, from the vibe and comments I get from people around me, it would be a mistake to assume that Obama is going to have an easy time getting some of my neighbors to put aside old attitudes. It can happen, but it will take work and a focus on common ground.

user-pic

Devilstower had a great post this morning at dKos.

What McCain and Palin offer is a chance to indulge in the ugliest aspects of small town culture. It's a heady opportunity to sneer at the achievements of those who have excelled. It's an open offer to stand at the political podium and throw trash at those leftist extremists who actually think that everyone is just as American and just as patriotic as Jane and Jimmy Middleamerica. It's an exciting enticement to wallow in public hate flavored with the forbidden spice of racism.
user-pic

Where I live, in addition to the usual suspects there are a lot of the large town/small city little league Moms and Dads that carry the latent bias that keeps them from voting Obama. Some of the farmers actually have too much sense to vote Republican. I too have seen Obama several signs where most would assume you wouldn't see them.

I cannot deny the numbers in WV that are letting their prejudice get in the way of their gbetter judgment, but it is not as clear cut and across the board as it appears on the surface. That is why we stand a chance ar changing some minds.

I think it depends on the area of the country. In the south, rural voters are pretty much a monolith. They think he's a socialist Muslim, and that he going to try to take away their guns.

I don't disagree, but I wouldn't count on it as a matter of winning the election. People need to donate, volunteer, and keep moving toward the election as if the current polls mean something dire for Obama.

user-pic
The neocons who're now running...

I've gotta think that apostrophe is spurious.

user-pic

Well, Alan Greenspan is scaring the hell out of me this morning! Is the country going to trust the economy to a doddering old man who does know anything or care anything about the economy and a wingnut hockey mom?

People keep going on about the religious right wingnuts as the Repub base. But the fiscal-conservative / social-moderates are also part of this base. As the election nears, I predict many of these people will start to edge over to Obama and Biden (one of the reasons Biden works for Obama). We are talking about swing states that will go down to a percentage point or two difference.

And I would argue that what voters Palin could bring to McCain has gone to him. Any gains from here on out has to come from McCain and so far he's shown that he is not capable of that.

I think that the key to getting the social moderates is to bluntly hit home what Palin stands for: no abortion even in cases of rape or incest, charging rape victims for their own rape kit likely because it contains emergency contraception, no sex education, climate change denial, aerial wolf killing. When I tell undecideds this, they are appalled - AND HAD NO IDEA. Obama needs to get the word out in a loud and blunt way.

Fiscal conservatives will vote for the candidate who they perceive will keep taxes low - and keep the markets stable. To get these folks, demonstrate that a McCain/Palin win would so destabilize the markets that their fortunes would be at risk.

What destablizes the markets: war. This is what McCain/Palin will bring us.

I agree, but only to a point. War HERE would destabilize our markets. War in China or any of the larger markets, as well in terms of global markets. War in Iraq is simply a means to make money, because they have no markets and oil is still flowing from elsewhere.

Farrell over at Marketwatch had an interesting opinion piece on the fact that our economy thrives on war. It's a bit nutty, but it also says a lot about how a large contingent of the voting public secretly loves war. How many of those jackasses were chanting USA! USA! when McCain was talking about the Iraq war at his RNC speech?

user-pic

I agree he needs to target some of the old country club Republicans. They're often more culturally liberal and I can't see how they can be confident with the wingnuts and neocons in control of this country.

Fuck Alan Greenspan. If he wants to resurrect his shredded reputation he needs to enthusiastically endorse Obama, NOW. Same goes for Powell, Hagel, and all the other insiders who know goddamn well what a disaster the PALIN / mccain administration would be. Speak up NOW or we will forever know that you put party before country when it really mattered.

user-pic

well put...

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

Well, Alan Greenspan is scaring the hell out of me this morning! Is the country going to trust the economy to a doddering old man who does [sic] know anything or care anything about the economy and a wingnut hockey mom?

I couldn't agree more-- Greenspan and Andrea Mitchell frighten me. Now what are your views on Palin and McCain?

user-pic

Here's a message for you, Obama, even Thomas Friedman has decided saving the US is a more urgent requirement that saving the middle east:


"Sorry, but there is no sustainable political/military power without economic power, and talking about one without the other is nonsense. Unless we make America the country most able to innovate, compete and win in the age of globalization, our leverage in the world will continue to slowly erode. Those are the issues this election needs to be about, because that is what the next four years need to be about."

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

To do this takes a little while. It doesn't fit into a soundbite that resonates with the public very easily. But I believe that Obama is aiming to do this. The focus on education last week was the beginning (which unfortunately got lost with the pig and lipstick coverage - which only shows the difficulty in taking issues like this on.)

user-pic

Perhaps this $66 million haul (which includes some of my dough) will enable Obama to ditch the ad agency Axelrod hired and get a firm with talent. With just a few exceptions, the ads I've seen stink. Unimaginative, slow-paced, lame music, uncompelling voiceovers.

In particular, the ad my family and I watched last night with Obama speaking into the camera was embarrassing, because he's very obviously reading cue cards... you can easily see his eyes scanning back and forth to something just off-camera. It was the first time my wife, daughter, and I had seen the ad, and we all noticed it at the same time and laughed in cringing, "what the hell were they thinking?" embarrassment. We're all going to vote for Obama, but his advertising is of no help whatsoever to him.

Seconded.

I would respectfully disagree with you on the ad. I think it works well with the undecided voters who are struggling with their choice, rather than just being disengaged.

user-pic

I agree that Obama's advertising is no help to him at all. It's lame and forgettable. I just don't get how such a brilliant campaign is so pitiful at ad making. A few are good but they seem to be afraid to say anything.

Watch the ad Planned Parenthood did in response to McCain's lying "sex ed" ad. Now, that's how you take the fight to Repugs!

But that's what SURROGATES do! This is exactly what the campaign wants: those surrogates, be it people or organizations, to bloody McCain's nose in a way that helps Obama but isn't Obama doing it.

Obama should continue taking the high road, and strike when necessary at those hateful, lying ads. Going negative all the time is no way to get independents to swing, either.

user-pic

Agreed! Yes, the campaign must remain above the fray. While we call out all the lies and the smears and the dirty, underhanded, attempts to lower the vote or deny a person's vote.

When you've got nothing else, blame the music in the ads.

user-pic

The Obama camp needs new ads hitting McCain on the economy.

It should be economy, economy, economy in all the ads.

Well there new Lobbyist ad has ties to the economy.

Yes, I agree. As part (a BIG part) of their message about helping Americans in this economy, the Obama camp needs to pound on the competing tax cut proposals...again and again and again. If they want to catch up some with that bothersome white male demo, the myth that BO will raise your taxes has to be knocked down.

Its the economy, stupid!---the Obama team needs new hard hitting, tough ads attacking McCain.

user-pic

Woooo Hoooooooooooooo!!!

I've been waiting to hear this.

We're rocking and rolling - quit worrying!

Sorry, I'm still worried (not panicky, worried) They have the resources to do what needs to be done- strip the bark off McCain, mercilessly. But do they have the guts? Not so far. Let's hope.

Let's be honest here. If this election remains close, then between racism and Rethug cheating, we're screwed. McCain must be DESTROYED. His reputation must be so completely trashed that it will never recover even if he lives for another 50 years. (And let's not have any compunctions about it- he's a complete slimeball and it'll be richly deserved.) If Obama won't go there, the 527's must. The stakes are too high for anything less.

The racism issue seems to be brought up a lot more these days to explain the undecideds. Chuck Todd just talked about in the context of Wisconsin and Michagan.

At this point I still think it has no greater impact than say McCain's age. All the plus and minus qualities will balance out and the election will decided on who best makes the case for change.

"Best case for change?" I heard the same kind of crap about why Gore would win. And why Kerry would win. Face it- we live in a stupid, ignorant country, in which close elections are decided by the MOST ignorant.

We'll win if those morons get an image stuck in their heads of McGigolo as a shameless liar of low character who can't be trusted with the reins. That's how politics works in the United States of Rove. Do I want that to change? Of course. But it can't start to change until AFTER we take their power away. I'm not up for another high-minded campaign leading to another close defeat. And Obama, a true patriot, shouldn't be up for it either. He knows what's at stake.

Remember what happened when Clark went after McCain. It is only in the last few days that the MSM would be open that it's okay for Obama to attack the character of McCain, and not make the attack itself the news item of the day.

Making the case for change is not necessarily saying it is about the issues. The case in this election probably will be based on "who can you trust." Hence, the attacks on the McCain's ties to lobbyists by Obama.

What I remember is that Obama immediately threw Clark under the bus. If he had backed Clark (a decorated war hero as well as a retired general) up, Clark's utterly truthful and reasonable statement, which he would then have continued to make, would have gained traction. The process of taking the varnish off McCain would have begun much sooner.

Shit, Biden is STILL going around saying what a great guy McCain is. Next time he does that he should be shot- and replaced with Clark.

P.S. The Rovians running McGigolo's campaign openly boast that they don't give a fuck what the MSM thinks. That in a nutshell is why these sickos win elections. I could give a shit about Bob Fucking Schieffer.

user-pic

I get the picture -

There is not one thing Obama could do that would please you. He could start raising the dead and it wouldn't be enough.

It will never be enough for you.


You must be confusing me with one of the trolls. I think he's run a smart campaign in a lot of ways, but his messaging is still not where it needs to be, by a considerable distance. It's fixable, but time's a-wasting.

user-pic

Alright, let's cut this down to the bone: what makes you so damned certain that you know what Obama needs to do?

What is it about you that makes you more special than either Barack or David Plouffe?

The fact that I've seen this goddamn movie too many times before, that's what. High-minded Dem overestimation of Americans' intelligence, and refusal to really bloody their opponent, leads to "moral victory" (i.e. narrow loss and the country keeps going to hell.) See Bill Clinton on "strong and wrong vs. weak and right". And even Clinton would never have been President if Ross Perot had never been born.

user-pic

YOu aren't seeing the same movie I am

Which just proves my point. From your standpoint, nothing would please you except possibly if all the Repugs were locked in a room and someone sent in the AKs.

I mean - you're twisting in the wind here. It's going great - so what the fuck is your problem? You're stuck in '04, that's your problem - and that's a loser's game.

At this point I will only say that I hope to hell you're right. Otherwise we are truly screwed.

We should be worried though... but not to the point of fretting.

We need to do everything possible to win. Donate. Contact our friends and encourage them to do so. Put information and/or links on Barack Obama's policies in the hands of individuals that need to know about how they would effect them and make their lives better. Using the campaign website to place calls into battleground states. Encourage others to donate and get involved.

If there's anything worse than fretting, it's feeling overcocky. We need to put serious some serious time and effort into winning this race!

user-pic
But do they have the guts? Not so far. Let's hope.

Fine - worry yourself into a lot of wrinkles and an early grave. I think you're wack, frankly.

Money speaks for itself,
I ain't gotta say shit.


Bun B.

I think fund raising is the best indicator of where we are. I think polls are bullshit. Money is real - this is real. This is support.

500,000 new donors. These are people who are now invested in Obama. These are people who go out and vote. The key is registration and turnout in the swing states.

user-pic

Those are the keys alright.

Turnout means we win. Always has but this time it really does. With all the newly registered Democratic voters - wow.

And I've seen nothing to indicate that the enthusiasm for the McCain/Palin ticket is coming from anywhere else besides those who were already going to vote for McCain.

As the campaign trudges on McCain's inability to inspire or articulate a vision will suck the air out of any enthusiasm generated by the convention and the Palin decision.

user-pic

I agree. Palin may just be bringing the racists out of the closet and giving us a clearer indication of what the real vote is likely to be though that can't give Obama any room for comfort either. They were saying on NBC that she hasn't moved numbers in the West. That tells me it's the religious nuts and racists where she's pulling and as you say they were never going for Obama regardless.

But they may have just stayed home if it were not for Palin. THAT'S what's changed. And it's enough to win a close election

Yes, Obama has a better ground game than any previous Dem candidate. But the Christian Fascist churches haven't forgotten how to turn out their acolytes, and now they have a reason to be enthusiastic about doing it.

user-pic

Thank you for using the "fascist" word. It is greatly underused. I'm not so sure it is most appropriate for the fundie nuts but it fits the Cheney crowd precisely and it's the Cheney crowd who will be the ones pulling the strings of the McCain/Palin puppets.

user-pic

Nip fascism in the bud:

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

user-pic

I have been singing that song since she showed up.

Anyone who thinks independents are going to stick with that ticket is a little crazy. Most American voters don't self-identify as anything - not as liberal, not as conservative.

This woman has hardened positions that are very extreme and she is the best walking ad for what is wrong with McLame we could have asked for.

She's scary - and not just to us.

user-pic

I still like the "TWO JOHNNIES" ad idea, with a slied-show of split-screen images of McCain's many duplicitous statements laid side-by-side.

It reminds the sincerely patriotic Republicans (the REAL "Country First Gopers)they really don't have a choice for change in their own party...they are relegated to "The Maverick" on the bus or "The Machine" and his psuedo-Christian pit-bull in lipstick?

Follow the split-screen slide-show with a series of scrolling comments from McCain's Republican detractors who think he's insane and dangerous, and it really helps the undecided voters choose Obama.

That's a great idea. Anything out there on YouTube? Sounds like something that has already been or could easily be done.

user-pic

Robert Greenwald's done both angles, but never in the same vid... my point is that showing McCain's own conflicting words sets up the independents and undecideds so the anti-McCain Republicans can push them off the fence.

Both angles work, (McCain's fliup-flops AND Republican detractors) but together, they really drive home the fact that many Republicans want rid of the neocon partymasters who have destroyed their party along with our international respect and authority.

user-pic

I've never given a dime to any political campaign. But I've donated bags of money to Obama. To me, this is the most important election of my lifetime, and I am determined to do whatever I can to help get Barack Obama elected. Obama's financial advantage will be an enormous factor in this race, and I plan to give much more money to the campaign in the coming weeks.

I'm constantly reminding everyone I know how important this is. My parents told me recently that they'd decided they had given as much as they were going to give this election season. I told them, "Come ON! We're in the home stretch. Now is exactly the wrong time to back off. We can BUY this election! We can beat the Republicans by swamping them financially. Cut back on Don Pablo's one night a month and give the money to Obama or the DNC." So they're donating again. It's worth it. Whatever we spend now is an investment in our futures. A few hundred bucks (or more) now could literally save you thousands of dollars over the coming years. Think about it. Donating to Obama is money well spent.

Most of the people who read this blog don't need the pep rally, obviously. But for anyone who does, please--donate. Five bucks if that's all you can afford. But donate. Let's buy ourselves an election.

user-pic

I think Palin gave the wingnuts and excuse, not a reason, to support the ticket.

They will never forgive the Maverick Johnny for openly criticizing their neoconisms, but they would die beofre they would support a Democrat (so much for "country first"...) so they were just looking for an excuse to support McCain and Palin gave them that excuse.

Again, how typically hypocritical of them all; trash Obama for "celebrity" popularity and call him a messianic wannabe, but the moment Palin slithered onto the scene, they held her up like some female messiah, come down from the north country to save their wingnut delusions from the obscurity that The Truth tends to eventually impose on all deluded ideologues.

Great. Where's it going? We need lots more hard-hitting ads, running in lots of battleground states. Otherwise, what the hell good is this massive warchest?

Good for things like Florida, wasting 13 million dollars there and being up to 5 points behind. And McCain only started spending there about a week ago.

Given that the demographics favor McCain in Florida, that he only has +5 at this point isn't that big of deal in the middle of september.

blabbity bla bla bloo blah

btw, can we fire tom brokaw? what a fucking puppet.

user-pic

Bup bup bup bup sputter spit bup sputter spit. You remind me of an old car I just donated to charity, Lalo.

Really, every time you jot words in this forum, your flame of ignorance fans higher and higher. You'll thank us later for saving you from your pitbull, Lalo.

We don't expect gratitude, though. Just your complete and utter silence will be enough. Or crazed weeping.

Whichever you prefer.

user-pic

You know what I need?

I need to watch Obama's campaign and enjoy how very well they handle everything.


All the armchair campaign runners here have 5000 different ideas about what Obama is doing wrong.

Excuse me? Could you, Doofus, possibly raise $66 million in one month for any reason?


Jeez, people -

Ads are important but so is the ground game which requires field offices. Bush won Ohio in large part because of the ground game. Yes Palin has brought the wingnuts with their ground game, but Obama has the resources to ensure coordination around registration and GOTV.

user-pic

Man would I love to be a fly on the wall at McLame Campaign HQ when they got this news.


BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahaha!

Given that what the race is basically tied and McCain and Palin can't split up and campaign separately but have to be joined at the hip.

And as one talking head pointed out this morning, Biden may not be getting national news coverage but he is getting plenty of local news coverage in the places he's going. In spite of blogs and 24/7 news outlets, much of the general election is still local coverage (which is what Bill Clinton was so good at).

user-pic

Actually, you have to wonder if joined-at-the-hipness also saves them money! They have only so much and no more coming their way now.

You probably would just have heard them call up Sheldon Adelson and tell him he'll need to pony up a little more money. Not a problem for him.

user-pic

Meanwhile, the McCain campaign has been reduced to LYING about crowd sizes at their rallies. They say 23000. The reporters who were there say 8000. This is so NOT a horserace.

user-pic

I said this a few days ago but I'll say it again:

Stepping back from my periodic hysteria over how the campaign's going, it's looking more and more to me like Obama is playing it like a master. Now, I know a lot of us are bemoaning that Obama hasn't been hitting McCain harder with negative ads. But look at it this way: last week the Obama campaign signalled to the 527s that they are welcome to open fire. Up until this point, thanks to Obama telling them to step off back in June, the liberal 527s have been quiet. This has had two effects: 1) because there hasn't been any activity from the liberal 527s, the conservative 527s have remained relatively quiet. 2) because the conservative 527s have remained relatively quiet, it has fallen on John McCain to sling the shit himself. Essentially, what this means is that McCain has been burning through his media budget destroying his own biggest positives - his alleged integrity and honor - with sleazy, dishonest attack ads. He's not put any time into defining what a president John McCain thinks is important, what he would actually do as president, etc etc. And it's too late for him to do it now - that ship sailed for good during the Republican convention, which was dedicated to more of the same. At the same time, McCain's transparent dishonesty is starting to turn his "base" - the media - against him. He's no longer the "straight talker" open to talking to the media - that got cut off a month ago, right about when he really started to wallow in the shit.

So here we are, 6 or 7 weeks out from the election, and it's too late for McCain to pivot back to the themes of "honor and integrity", because his base no longer has his back. He's stuck with having to play the game the way he's been playing it for the past several months. Except now, he'll be throwing his shit against the veritable shit tsunami that's about to crash all over him from the liberal 527s. It's not going to be pretty. But I fully expect to see it, because the lib 527s have been sitting on the sidelines and keeping their powder dry for the past 3 months, and during that time, McCain has been creating numerous points of attack. Last week was Obama's Mr. Burns moment, when he turned to the liberal 527s and said, "Smithers, release the hounds." And now, the ripping of flesh is about to commence.

I don't expect for the Obama campaign itself to run ads that are bitingly negative. Then again, they won't have to. The 527s will take care of that. Obama has managed to remain above the sleaze thus far; he's just stood back and watched as McCain shit down his own leg. Has it cost him a few points in the polls? Yes, but that's reversible with the 527s doing the pushback. By the time election day rolls around, we'll have two candidates who have been smeared, but only one of them who has shit all over his own hands, while the other one will be the only one of the two who has offered up any idea to voters about what he will actually do if elected.

Next week will tell all. Already we've seen a couple of hard-hitting 527 ads surface - one from Planned Parenthood and one from a wildlife gorup on aerial hunting of wolves. I expect that these are just the tip of a very large iceberg.

Fear not, children, this game is not played out yet.

Given these fundraising totals, how in the HELL can you account for the article in the Times a week or so ago that said there was anxiety among Dems and people in the Obama camp that he was way behind his projected totals, and that he might have erred by opting out of public financing? Where do stories like this come from?

Those come out every month. They're bullshit.

user-pic

It's horserace garbage. There's nothing exciting to write about, so they're making stuff up. Everyone understands what's going on. They all see the advantage Obama has, and they also know he's going to win this election. But what else have they got?

This is where I give Plouffe et al. a lot of credit- they're very good at playing the expectations game.

user-pic

This I agree with. That has been really fun to watch.

I just keep putting it this way: Obama is a hustler and the best I've ever seen.

I'd be very careful shooting pool or hoops with Barack Obama.

Either because Axelrod and Plouffe purposely did this, which I doubt, or because nobody knows anything about Obama fundraising except for like 5 people plus Obama and they're jus tshooting their mouth off.

Notice Plouffe used the word handwringers and bedwetters the other day. This was aimed at these idiot high dollar donors.

This is during the celebrity attacks as well as Obama's convention.

The Republican Party and McCain have lost the Mandate of Heaven (Confucian image)in terms of any governance for the foreseeable future. It's just gone.

The Democrats and Senator Obama know that, and are responding accordingly, and when the general public gets that 'Aha' moment the walls will come tumbling down. The intuition is out there, it just needs nurturing to fully express itself.

user-pic

I completely, utterly agree. Cycles and change are vastly underappreciated in Western culture. The tide carries the waves. The waves do not carry the tide.

I wish the electorate were as evolved as you seem to suggest they are. I'm not so confident.

I don't think it has as much to being more evolved, but that the average voter, fearing their own and their community's economic condition, will vote who they think can save them.

user-pic

What hootowl was referring to has nothing to do with the electorate. It has to do with the natural cycles of Heaven. When the universe moves, everything within the universe is swept along. Call it fate or call it hooey. Doesn't matter. Our only real choice in life is the choice of how we react to forces completely outside of our control. That's "free will". Our recent hurricanes have reminded us all how powerless we are in the face of those universal, uncontrollable forces. Obama is riding a spiritual, political, social hurricane. Nothing man-made can stop what's coming. Nothing.

I have the same general intuition about things -- and ultimately believe Obama will pull through because of it.

But, right at this very moment, from a rational perspective (polls), it doesn't look great for Obama.

I lost a lot of faith in the wisdom of the American electorate in 2004. A lot of faith.

Remember, sometimes these larger cycles included nations going down very horrible and dangerous paths for an unbearably long while. Where was the mandate of heaven when fascism spread across Europe, when Hitler came to power?
In my more cynical moods, President Palin looks almost as likely as President Obama.

user-pic

I said this the other night, I'll say it again - that damn "voters are stupid so it doesn't matter anyway" argument is just a boilerplate argument that can be used to shoot down any positive comment whatsoever.

It's meaningless. Show me proof that voters are overwhelmingly stupid in the majority. I'll show you proof that you're wrong, starting with the election in '06, and moving right along to Bush's approvals, which haven't cracked 46% in over 4 years.

And the Iraq War is as popular as syphillis.

Where's your proof that we are so fucking stupid?

Tena:

Spend a weekend in Texas and you'll feel that way. I saw more McCain bumper stickers on massive SUVs driven by single people using cell phones swilling big gulps with gun racks in two days than I see in 14 years in California. Every restaurant had Fox News on and the word "uppity" was more than any word except "y'all" or the phrase "Hook 'em Horns." My parents used to be Democrats but are both supporting McCain. Ugh.

Joe

I would add that the Unions have a month and half to work with their people in the swing states. I doubt that McCain can expect to pick any new labor democrats, but can expect to have those in his camp now to be whittled away.

user-pic

OT - but what a shock - my god, David Foster Wallace killed himself.

That gives me cold chills - I envied his talent and I hate envy, it's ugly, but Infinite Jest was the kind of book that makes me think - O god, this is literature - this is writing.

And it wasn't enough to overcome whatever his demons were.

What a loss.

user-pic

hmm, this strikes me as a rather non-literary bunch.

;)

user-pic

If blogs, newspapers and pdf whitepapers count as literature, then most of us are very literary. Otherwise, maybe not so much... :)

This two-year-long campaign has really cut into my novel consumption.

user-pic

Sheeeeeeeeeeeit - the computer - period - has cut into my reading.

I'm with you, Tena!

I'm just not as "uppity" as you are ;-)

user-pic

God, I am, aren't I?

I never had the right word for it before.

A horrific loss. We are so fortunate that his books live on, footnotes and all.

user-pic

Why hasn't he been spending it? I keep reading about record fundraising, but I keep seeing McCain and RNC commercials. Obama is being outspent 3 to 1 in my neck of the woods.

In eastern Indiana Obama has the edge.

Here in WI, it's equal ... and that's smart. In my neck of the woods (Northeast WI), it's a highly conservative, paper mill area. But in Madison and Milwaukee it's a large population of Dems. Obama is going to carry WI like Gore and Kerry before him.

user-pic

I live in a swing state (Minnesota). Believe me, he's spending it. The Obama campaign is targeting 18 states. If you don't live in one of those states, it's likely you're not seeing much. Also, as Plouffe has stated, the strategy is to build slowly and overwhelm them right before the election. By election day, Americans are gonna think they only dreamed McCain.

Those up for grabs won't make thier decision until the last two weeks. What is out there right now will have faded from their memory. Only a mild impression will remain.

user-pic

He's spending it in New Mexico, too. Believe me - there are Obama ads all over the local networks.

I have a question (anyone?) about the assertion that Obama is on track to raise $300 for the GE, namely, how is that possible?

I assume, to start with, that by GE we really mean the post-convention period and not the period beginning, say, in early June when Obama became the presumptive nominee.

On this assumption (and assuming also that the $66m haul in August is money now on hand) Obama must raise $244m in a little over two months. That's about $122m a month. That doesn't sound on track to me.

But is the $66m raised in Aug. actually money on hand, or was most of it already spent before the convention? If the latter, then we're talking more like $150m a month that Obama has to raise to achieve the $300m goal. Again, that doesn't sound on track.

But let's assume that when we talk about $300m for the GE, we're really talking about money raised since June 1, a total of about $120m. That still leaves $180 to go or $90m a month over the next two months. Again, not on track?

What am I missing in all this? Somebody HELP!

user-pic

Candidates are not prohibited from raising GE funds before the primary season is ended. For donors who have "maxed out" on what they can give for the primaries, if they give more that money is salted away into the GE fund. FWIW, I seem to remember some kind of "cash on hand" of $150 mill figure being tossed around just before the convention. This would have come from donors already maxed out for the primary cycle.

Hum. I haven't heard that from anyone else. I'd have thought that when McC got his $82m in public financing, people would have been saying, Ah, but Obama has $150m from the primary season. etc. But I heard no such thing.

Can anyone come up with some definite answers on this. Greg, you're the one who posted this story. Can you help? How much money does Obama have on hand? What period is the $300m supposed to be covering? How much must Obama raise in the next two months to meet that figure?

Why aren't there straightforward answers to these questions?

No the GE started the moment the primaries ended. That is about 5 months. If you raise 50mill a month (ALONG with the DNC money don't forget that). That will be about 70 mill a month, which ends up equaling 350 million. Obama is actually SURPASSING that, this month alone he raised over 80 mil(along with the DNC). So he is a bit ahead of schedule.

That makes a little more sense, although when the McCain campaign talks about the GE, I'm pretty sure they mean the post-convention period. My guess is that if we compare the amount of money Obama has on hand today with the amount McCain has on hand today, we're talking a huge discrepancy in McCain's favor.

Who cares if Obama raised $150m in the three months before September 1, when that money has already been spent and the net result is that he now trails in the polls? If he is to surmount McCain's $82m on hand plus the RNC's $50 or $60 on hand plus all those 527s, he's going to have to raise a hell of a lot more than $66m a month over the next two months.

The key here is how much money Obama had on hand as of September 1, and my guess is that it was probably not more than $15m. And let's not forget that Palin is going to bring in a huge haul for the RNC to supplement McCain's public financing.

My sense is that Obama and the DNC are going to fall woefully short in the money competition. I wish someone would reassure me to the contrary.

And forget the comedy, Oilbama. You are not naturally funny and you do not speak โ€œstreet.โ€ You speak like a egomaniacal professor. And you do not know how to set up a joke. That โ€œlipstick on a pigโ€ line clearly either backfired, or you are as big a Sexist Jerk as everyone thinks you are. If you had said, โ€œAs John McCain said about Hillary Clintonโ€™s health care โ€ฆ lipstick on a pig is still a pig,โ€ at least you would have had a frame of reference to fall back on. You didnโ€™t, you left yourself left wide open and you got nailed. Now everything you say will be double-examined for sexism., as it should be after the dispicable Racist and Sexist campaign you ran against the Clintons. Oilbama voted for the Bush Cheney Energy Bill which contained 6 Billion in givaways top Big Oil proving Oilbama who loves Big Oil as much as Bush and Cheney who represents more of the same. Thank God people are seeing this scumbag Oilbama and his scumbag Oilbamabots for what they truly are.

Vapid, vacuous

Troll Jizz

Uhhh .... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Two McCain points for you! Great post ...

Sincerely,
The old curmudgeon affectionately referred to as POW Johnny

user-pic
And forget the comedy, Oilbama. You are not naturally funny and you do not speak โ€œstreet.โ€

I suppose you do speak" street" and count Jay Z and Ludacris among your friends and admirers -


You're just an envy-hiding snake. Guess what? I just spoke "street." Straight from Nas.

Do you who that is? Nas? Tell me, Dimwit.

user-pic

He's not doing a good job of hiding the envy, Tena. It just drips from every post.

Feinstein rocks as a surrogate.

For people who are in a constant state of criticism over those ads, you have to come to grips with the reality that you are hyper-informed about these issues and nuances. You know all the gritty details that most people simply don't know. What you assume will be some sort of knockout ad would probably be met with a big shrug by people who aren't following these things like we do. They don't know about Wasilla, or PUMAs, or John McCain's old stances, or Obama's biography. These things need to be introduced in a precise way.

The Obama campaign is focus-grouping these ads to death, and people just have to stop assuming they know what "works" just because they want to see the Obama campaign hit them like they personally would if they could just scream at them for an hour in a locked room.

Yep! You got it!

My question is does anyone have actual data where these 500,000 new donors reside? This type of data may provide some extremely useful insights!

It should be remembered that there were only three days after the end of the DNC for people to donate for Obama because of Sarah Palin.

So, when you heard about Sarah Palin's speech bringing in over $10M for Obama... what that means is that the great majority of the Sarah backlash in Dem. fundraising has yet to be tallied. Likewise, we haven't seen what kind of bounce Obama might've gotten after the NYTimes article called his fundraising "anemic".

That doesn't mean that Democrats can be complacent for one second... indeed, please donate again, because Big Money Republicans are very effectively using 527's and the party's coffers to fund Obama, to the point that their actual spending will be nearly $300M... Obama's goal for fundraising by the end of the campaign.

If we want to outdo McCain on total ad expenditures in states like Ohio, Virginia, and Florida, our goal shouldn't be to meet the current goals. It should be to greatly exceed them.

So donate... again, even! And after you donate, use the tool on the website to let all your email contacts know why you donated, and encourage them to do so as well! It might be a bit embarrassing, perhaps... but it's far better than war with Iran, Bush taxcuts for the rich, or the estimated $30,000 per family of national debt that Bush's mismanagement has cost America.

http://www.barackobama.com

Donate now. You can't afford not to help win this one.

The Obama Camp released this news on a Sunday for a reason - they don't want this being big news as they fear it might dissuade folks from donating more in the future if they think other folks are going to keep giving at their current pace. If he's pulling $66M, then he won't miss my $100 a month that I could use myself.

If each of his 2.5M donors could just give another $100 in the GE season, that would give him a whopping $250M.

He's going to need it too, because the swiftboaters are gearing up again.

With cash on hand this means $320M; at the current pace this means about $210M+. If related 527 folks kick in this may mean $500M in total, money will not be an issue; the significant issue appears to be that Obama & Co. has a structure in place to well use and target this money.

I bet that the Media will report this toda or in the next few days:

Obama does poorly in terms of fund raising. He is way under the 100 Millions per month...

It is now obvious that the democratic is not unified, and that the Clintons hillraisers have not joined the Obama bandwagon...

We now belivieve that Obama is privately regretting not to have used the same strategy as McWar....

After not selecting Clinton has his VP, it is now obvious that Senator Obama has shown poor judgement.


-------------------------------------------------

I will give another $200 this month to the Obama campaing

Obama 08/12

Big mistake when Hillary is not in the picture. Obama, you have any idea how many people that I know refuse to vote for you because Hillary was not chosen to be VP?

Shame on you Obama, to save humiliation, we all think you should drop out the race as soon as posible.

Donation for your race? No way, just give it up.
Wake up America, please open your eyes and read the POLLS

user-pic

One Stop Shop for Vetting Lady mcLiar:

http://dailysource.org/palin#toc

Amazing list of all topics and issues with videos and links related to each.

Bookmark it! Use it!

user-pic
Donation for your race? No way, just give it up. Wake up America, please open your eyes and read the POLLS

ROFLMAO!

Things couldn't be going better for Obama, based on the number of concern trolls here today.

to quote Lil Wayne - "B'lieve that"

Oh, common, WAKE UP AMERICA, why keep talk about how much money Obama got from fund rasing? Just read the Polls.
The Polls implies that the more money he recieves, the less votes he gets.
Ha ha, I bet people are giving him money because they feel sorry for him.

I am guessing you just started paying attention to what is going on...

I am guessing you just started paying attention to what is going on...

user-pic

eh, another fracking troll.

Actually asiancutie, I feel sorry for you...

You must be a really sad person to come up with such crap and stupidity...

I have a sense you get your talking points from the McWar campaign...

It seems to me that people are looking beyond the distractions and focusing on the nominee who has laid out a real plan for getting us out of the figurative mud in which we are stuck. The reality is we all have our own idea of change. We all have our own hopes and dreams. This election is about choosing the candidate that best identifies with where we want to be. Obama does that for me. If you want to share your thoughts about change, your hopes and dreams, come on over to changehopedream.com and tell your story.

user-pic

My aunt and uncle have an anniversary this week. They just got a shiny new donation to the Obama campaign to celebrate.

The maid of honor from my wedding has a birthday Tuesday. She just got a beautiful donation to the Obama campaign for her happy day.

Another close friend celebrates her birthday next week. Any guess what she's getting?

This is fun!

Sure as hell beats shopping at WalMart :)

i think you're right. if you haven't already, read mendell's biography of obama. he treats a decent length axelrod's and gibbs's theory -- wait, wait, wait, flood them.

i don't think they can wait much longer -- this is much different than the dem primary for the US senate seat, but so far, everything seems to be in line with the axelrod/gibbs strategy.

i'm no expert (and certainly, i've been given over to panic lately), but i would think that the first debate will be the trigger. you'll see the airwaves -- TV and radio -- absolutely FLOODED, surrogates will start going full-bore, and obama and biden will up their rhetoric exponentially.

that's just my guess based on reading mendell's book, though. i'm FOR SURE no expert, and barely even a political novice. so i guess i should take myself with a whole shaker-full of grains of salt.

dammit (login killed the "reply to" function). this was in response to hrebendorf at 12:01 pm.

user-pic

I agree with you - it's still early. I know it doesn't feel like it, but it is. Now is not the time to pull out the stops to win. That comes down to the wire and we're not there yet.

That's another reason the polls are bullshit.

I so hope you're right on this. Another thing I've been waiting for, aside from a really effective ad, is making use of the many surrogates at his disposal. We've got Democratic governors in most of the swing states--PA, OH, MI, VA, NM, CO, etc., and then women such as Pelosi, Sebelius, Napolitano, and Clinton--even if Clinton won't speak out, why on earth aren't the other female surrogates more visible?

Oh, and the woman from MO--McCaskill? Saw her on a talking head show with a Repub rep, and she was awesome, totally dominated the Repub--I'd have her out there as much as possible. Obama should be making appearances with these people as well--every time he's in one of their states. And they should all be hitting McCain and Palin.

Here's another place where I'll come to the campaign's defense. Hillary Clinton was campaigning her ass off here in Ohio today, and McCaskill and Wasserman Schultz kicked butt and took names on the Sunday talk shows.

user-pic

Thunderclap Newman - Something In The Air
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pGht71KFkY

All you Obama supporters should go to the following site to see who his and your friends are. Check out his sypporters are. !!!www.theobamafile.com !!!!I would like to know who vetted Obama ????? You really need to check this out to see your fine prospect. He will destroy the USA from within... Clinton was the one that could've beaten McCain. Now it will be McCain/Palin in 08

that's the plan. we want to bring america to its knees before the alter of islamic jihadism. i didn't click on your link, but i hope it refers to our plan to force every kindergartner in america to fornicate under a PLO flag. 'cause really, that's the crux of the movement.

lol

Take nothing for granted. Give what you can as often as you can. Make phone calls. Knock on doors. Make sure every kid you know is registered properly!

20 days to register!

i'm signed up on the dotted line for "counsel for change," and have committed to provide my legal services in the days leading up to the election.

i've also given way more than i can afford. and will be giving more, until i hit that magic 2300 number.

user-pic

Just to shed a little light on the fundraising picture and what it all means:

Obama's Fundraising Machine Still Rolling as Campaign Stays Coy

"Barack Obama may be playing possum."

And for the silly trolls who want so desperately for us to let them frame the race for us, answer me this: Why can't McCain and Palin put this thing away? Why, after such a clever and calculated move as putting Palin on the ticket, and after a heavy barrage of lies and smears for more than a week, has the tiny post-convention bounce not turned into anything bigger for them?

Your team is stuck. The steamroller ran out of gas before it even got to the road.

Money talks, bullshit walks, but dumbshits fall flat on their face.

He's going to need this money. The MSM isn't doing much of a job of calling McCain and Palin on their lies.

http://palincounter.blogspot.com/

By not talking about the issues affecting working Americans, McCain/Palin are not putting Country First. By lying about Palin's record 9 times, they are not putting Country First. By refusing to allow meaningful interviews with the VP candidate and forcing us to play dice with America's future, McCain/Palin are not putting Country First. By favoring the rich and threatening to tax the healthcare of every day Americans, McCain/Palin are not putting Country First.

The team that puts Country First is Obama/Biden. McCain/Palin are more about Campaign First.

Please help spread the liar meme. Digg this new Obama ad

http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-ad-deception-is-all-mccain.html

Pointless. People expect candidates to accuse the opposition of lying. It will convert no one to the other side.

Let's buy ourselves an election.
Gotta love the cynicism of this post. While money matters up to a point, history repeatedly show that elections cannot be bought.

Notice how with less money McCain/Palin continues to dominate the narrative.

This race will still be decided based on:

Race
Trust
Experience

We also are serial, but erratic, contibutors to Obama... depending on news, frustrations, e-mail cajoling, position of the stars...
BUT, every time I send in another chunk of money I wish that campaigns were not so expensive. That buying ad time from
networks that use the PUBLIC airwaves is so costly and shouldn't be!

I'm glad for Obama's campaign to have gotten $66 Million, but just think what all
that money could do to help hurricane victims, or earthquake relief or OXFAM or... instead of going into fat main stream media coffers!!

This is my second post, though I have been reading and taking solace from TPM for awhile.
Thank you TPM and all, for, well, being there!

Obama must be overjoyed. He finally hit his perfect fundraising number 66.6 million.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address